Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Trader Joe’s Caves to Coalition of Immokalee Workers, Signs Fair Food Agreement
Months-long pressure campaign pays off
On Thursday, the Coalition of Immokalee Workers announced it had signed a Fair Food Agreement with Trader Joe’s, a significant step forward its efforts to bring fairness and accountability to the food industry. “We are truly happy today to welcome Trader Joe’s aboard the Fair Food Program,” CIW’s Gerardo Reyes said in a joint statement issued by CIW and Trader Joe’s. “Trader Joe’s is cherished by its customers for a number of reasons, but high on that list is the company’s commitment to ethical purchasing practices.”
The dispute has been going strong for some time. Here, a CIW supporter pickets a Trader Joe's in Manhattan on February 28, 2011. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)
The same statement, which the company has posted as a letter to customers on its website, hails Fair Food as "a groundbreaking approach to social responsibility in the U.S. produce industry that combines the Fair Food Code of Conduct...with a small price premium to help improve harvesters' wages." Trader Joe's did not respond to a request for further comment.
But it wasn’t long ago that activists were carrying “Traitor Joe’s” banners, and Trader Joe’s was condemning Fair Food Agreements as “overreaching, ambiguous, and improper.”
Trader Joe’s' reversal follows a months-long campaign. As Michelle Chen has reported for In These Times, it included "Trader Joe’s tours” last summer that picketed stores, educated consumers, and met with allies along the East and West Coasts.
In Boston, a group of fifth graders organized a rally outside a store. In New York, activists held a 1.6 mile run between two stores. The announcement of the settlement came on the eve of two planned days of coordinated protest pegged to the grand opening of Trader Joe’s' first-ever Florida location. That store, the company’s 367th, is located on Immokalee Road in Naples, 35 miles from the fields where the CIW was born.
CIW announced Thursday that Friday's and Saturday’s demonstrations, planned for Naples and 32 other cities, were being cancelled or replaced with actions targeting Fair Food holdout Publix instead.
CIW is a workers’ organization that partners with faith, labor, and consumer groups to push improvements in farm workers’ working conditions and voice on the job. It’s part of a growing trend of labor activism that takes place outside of the protections and restrictions of the National Labor Relations Act. CIW’s Trader Joe’s agreement is the latest in a series of victories achieved through comprehensive campaigns that leverage consumer and media pressure at strategic points in the tomato supply chain.
CIW achieved national prominence during its multi-year boycott of Taco Bell, which successfully forced the fast food giant to absorb the cost—a penny per pound—of modest labor reforms for workers in the fields. The three other largest fast food chains later followed suit.
CIW took the momentum from these victories—and the promise of an extra penny—and turned its focus to the growers who directly employ tomato growers.
As Kari Lyderson has reported for In These Times, agreements with major growers in 2010 mean that 90 percent of U.S. tomatoes come from growers who have signed Fair Food agreements. CIW estimates that more than 10,000 farm workers are now covered by these agreements. They include basic standards on wages and working conditions as well as a complaint procedure, independent auditing, and meetings between workers and management to monitor compliance. CIW is currently training farm workers on their rights under Fair Food Agreements, and how to enforce them.
Following its agreements with fast-food chains and growers, CIW turned its attention to another point the tomato supply chain: supermarkets. For these companies, signing a Fair Food Agreement means a commitment to absorb the penny-per-pound cost, source tomatoes only from growers that are complying with a Fair Food Agreement, and meet with CIW regarding compliance. Absent buy-in from supermarkets, CIW warned, growers that are currently abiding by Fair Food Agreements could violate them in the future, secure in the knowledge that noncompliance would not cost them supermarket business.
Throughout the months that it rebuffed CIW’s call for a Fair Food Agreement, Trader Joe’s insisted that it was already paying the extra penny-per-pound. Given that major growers were already signed on, that may well have been true—which suggests that Trader Joe’s true objection may have been less about spending money than about sacrificing power.
Although CIW never called a boycott of Trader Joe’s, “it was always a possibility if we needed to get there,” says CIW staffer Julia Perkins. In November, CIW sent an e-mail promoting a campaign by the New York Community/ Farmworker Alliance to send “Dear Joe” letters breaking up with the company over its refusal to sign a Fair Food Agreement. “The persistence of fair food activists,” says Perkins, “and of their consumers too, who kept going over and over to them…helped to show them that this was something they wanted to do.”
In August interviews (for Alternet) during their East Coast Trader Joe’s Tour, Immokalee tomato workers Oscar Otzoy and Wilson Perez described how the 2010 agreements had, along with improving their wages, changed their working conditions: managers stopped rampantly stealing wages, denying breaks, and demanding sex in exchange for less strenuous assignments.
Their pay remains well short of a living wage. But for the first time, said Perez, “We have a voice in the camps.”
Whole Foods was the first major supermarket to sign a Fair Food Agreement; Trader Joe’s is the second. Perkins says Trader Joe’s “didn’t agree to anything less” than Whole Foods had in its own agreement. CIW’s next major target is Publix, which has been refusing requests to sign an agreement.
CIW and religious allies have announced a six-day protest fast outside Publix headquarters that will begin March 5. Publix, charges Perkins, is “not just turning their back and refusing to meet with us, but really being a blockade in the road to truly changing conditions for farmworkers.” But she expects Publix will eventually follow Trader Joe’s and Publix in signing on to the Fair Food model. “It’s really the future of the industry.”


10 Comments so far
Show AllUsing the phrase "caved in" to CIW demands subtly insinuates weakness on the part of Trader Joe's. It is not so. Dan Bane demonstrates that corporate "personages" do have hearts, at least in his company. Signing the Fair Food Agreement is good for Trader Joe's, its customers, and the fieldworkers.
Agricultural workers in the United States enjoy none of the rights and protections of the rest of the work force. They are historically and carefully excluded from all that Congress has agreed to concerning child labor, wages, health care, social security, and Medicare/ Medicaid. Working by the piece (instead of by the hour) means such experiences as are documented on the CIW website of a man picking 1 fifty-pound bucket of "approved" tomatoes every 2.3 minutes for 10 hours one day and receiving in pay (before deductions) $58.
This intolerable situation has endured for decades. Publix must stop insisting that it "won't interfere in a labor dispute."
Agricultural workers have no union by law. It is disingenuous to call what the CIW is doing a "labor dispute." It is an appeal to the hearts of corporate executives to conscientiously choose growers with whom to do business. If the grower is not one of the 90% of growers who have signed the fair food agreement, the purchaser buys from farmers who abuse and exploit the poorest of the poor.
And their customers eat the poisoned fruit.
Traitor Joe's, eh?
I too noticed the word 'cave' in the headline which implies giving in to something powerful and against your own well-considered position. Interestingly, I didn't find that word in the actual article. The choice of headline implies someone was in a hurry, didn't understand the implications of the term chosen, or is trying to spin this in a negative way. I prefer to think, for Common Dreams, it was one or both of the first two possibilities.
It takes a lot of excess effort to make something big do something small, with attention to detail, repetitively. Nay, it's a lost cause. Better to have mom-n-pop shops, owned/operated locally. Don't waste your time monitoring supply-side lkapitalism, rather, help to drive it out of your local community. Support your local merchants, your local farmers.
“Trader Joe’s is cherished by its customers for a number of reasons, but high on that list is the company’s commitment to ethical purchasing practices."
Bravo, Trader Joe's! This just gave me one of the best reasons to continue doing business at your store.
Trader Joe's has tried to market goods that you will find hard if not impossible to get from your supermarkets soon.
Support Trader Joe's as Genetically modified food will be rampart in your super markets real soon even now.
Keep sanity in shopping and realize you have a Company in Trader Joe's that doesn't want to be like a unethical supermarket chains.
". . . Genetically modified food will be rampart in your super markets real soon even now." -- WILL be rampant? I have news for you: it already is rampant, even where you would least expect it. Most junk food that you can buy at Whole Foods that is labeled as "natural" is full of GMOs, not to mention pesticides and other stuff.
Did you and Gail above miss the part of this article where it says that, even with the extra penny per pound, the workers' pay will still remain well short of a living wage?
It looks to me like it's not that Trader Joe "doesn't want" to be unethical. It's just that it can't remain being unethical without negative publicity. They'll do only what they can get away with, and it turns out that they can't get away with not paying an extra penny for tomatoes any more. I'm not at all impressed by TJ's suddenly discovering ethical principles . . . under a boycott threat.
If you are really into ethical purchasing practices, discover your local Farmers Market, CSA, or perhaps a food co-op that is committed to Fair Trade.
Boycott has never yet been a CIW threat.
From the article: "Although CIW never called a boycott of Trader Joe’s, “it was always a possibility if we needed to get there,” says CIW staffer Julia Perkins."
Both boycotts and protests mean bad publicity, which is kind of the main point here. Luckily, TJ saw the light, or the writing on the wall, which saved everyone some trouble.
And they all lived happily ever after.
We heard a presentation by the CIW workers at our church. Can someone explain WHY Publix won't sign what seems to be such a reasonable request (1c increase in tomato price per pound, and better PR to go with it)? We got into the economics of tomato growing and distribution a little bit, but they didn't really explain the difference between the 50c (?) per pound the grower gets and the $2-3 per pound retail price. I assume it goes to middlemen. Grocery stores do not take 400-600% retail markups on cost. The CIW said their agreement includes the large retailers buying directly from the grower, and giving the savings to the pickers. Is this correct?