Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- 37 Percent of People Completely Lost
- An Open Challenge to Michelle Rhee and the Corporate Education Zombies
- If Corporations Don’t Pay Taxes, Why Should You?
- Introduced Constitutional Amendment says: 'Democracy for People, Not Corporations'
- Which Members of Congress Are Standing Up for Economic Decency – And Which “Progressives” Aren’t
Popular content
Today's Top News
If We Can Stop the Keystone Pipeline, We Can Stop Mountaintop Removal. Right?
One of the most heartening moments of solidarity in the Tar Sands Action movement took place last summer: A contingent of Appalachian coalfield residents, whose homes are literally under siege from daily blasting and stripmining fallout, took their place at a White House sit-in and went to jail in an appeal to President Obama to deny the TransCanada Keystone pipeline permit.
For the Appalachian residents, like many citizens on the dirty energy frontlines, the pipeline decision served as a litmus test for the Obama administration's commitment to dealing with climate change and a clean energy future.
Eastern Kentucky activist Teri Blanton, who lost her brother to a coal mining accident and has witnessed the destruction of her native Harlan County from stripmining over the past decades, invoked the words of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.:
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds.
We need that same sense of urgency and solidarity in the central Appalachian coalfields now -- from non-coalfield residents, Big Green environmental organizations, citizens and civil rights groups, students and senior citizens.
We need to call on President Obama to commit to an immediate moratorium on all mountaintop removal mining operations until the federal government can effectively mitigate a spiraling humanitarian crisis.
To be sure, central Appalachia has not cornered the market on dirty energy destruction. Coal-fired plants and coal ash piles take their daily toll on millions of American lives across the nation; natural gas fracking has spiraled out of control; uranium mining has left behind a deadly legacy. Devastating stripmining and longwall mining operations for coal take place in 24 states -- including my own homeland in the heartland, where a new coal rush threatens our forests and farms and communities again.
In fact, mountaintop removal has received far more attention and media coverage -- and generated major foundation support and large donations to numerous nonprofit groups outside of the coalfields -- than many other forms of dirty energy mayhem.
But the unfathomable level of destruction of our historic central Appalachian mountain communities and forests -- the carbon sink of the nation -- the mounting death toll, the unconscionable forced removals of American citizens, and the reams of studies on the indisputable health care and humanitarian crises from mountaintop removal coal mining should place it at the forefront of any litmus on President Obama's commitment to health care, clean energy and dealing with climate change.
Last summer, Dr. Michael Hendryx of West Virginia University released a study that should have headlined every newspaper in the country -- and launched an all-out national campaign on the level of the anti-tobacco campaigns of the past. Hendryx concluded: "Living in a mountaintop mining area was a bigger risk for birth defects than smoking."
This is truth: If we don't have the will to place a moratorium on mountaintop removal mining operations in four central Appalachian states, which provide less than five to seven percent of all coal production in the United States, it's game over for any effective mitigation of climate destabilization or the pursuit of a clean energy transition.
As a presidential candidate in 2008, President Obama told the nation that we needed to find a way to generate energy without "blowing off the tops of mountains."
Four years later, we are still blowing off the tops of mountains -- and needlessly so, as a clear environmental and human rights violations, following a 40-year policy of "regulating" mountaintop removal violations, not abolishing them. In truth, mountaintop removal operations have been plundering central Appalachian since 1970 -- more than four decades of regulated criminal violations, civil rights abuse, and death.
In 1971, Rep. Ken Hechler testified in front of Congress:
Representing the largest coal-producing state in the nation, I can testify that strip-mining has ripped the guts out of our mountains, polluted our streams with acid and silt, uprooted trees and forests, devastated the land, seriously destroyed wildlife habitat, left miles of ugly highwalls, ruined the water supply in many areas, and left a trail of utter despair for many honest and hard-working people.
Four decades after Hechler introduced a bill to abolish mountaintop removal and reckless strip mining, the U.S. Congress has completely abandoned central Appalachia to the whims of Big Coal lobbyists and their sycophant Big Coal-bankrolled supporters in the House, who have effectively derailed any legislation.
We can no longer wish for any congressional intervention. And while individual state efforts -- in Tennessee, for example -- are important, the buck on mountaintop removal stops with President Obama.
This is where the urgency and solidarity and audacious determination of national organizations -- and residents across the country -- are desperately needed, on a par with the tar sands movement. If we can stop the proposed Keystone pipeline, we can stop mountaintop removal.
If President Obama -- and Lisa Jackson's EPA, Eric Holder's DOJ, along with national civil rights and environmental groups in Washington, D.C., and elsewhere -- truly believed in a clean energy future and environmental justice, they would invite 97-year-old Ken Hechler to a special meeting at the White House this spring and announce a moratorium on mountaintop removal operations until the federal government can effectively mitigate a spiraling humanitarian crisis.
As one of our nation's greatest heroes of democracy, Ken Hechler deserves a Medal of Freedom.
As one of our greatest resources and historic natural landmarks, Appalachia deserves its freedom, too.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



50 Comments so far
Show AllSOLAR POWER TO THE PEOPLE
(TAKE STRESS OFF THE GRID AND ME)
A TWO YEAR SUCCESS PLAN.
RENEWABLE ENERGY ECONOMY.
transition to a low-carbon economy
Domestic Sustainability
Climate Emergency!
Check it out!
What's the alternative to Fracking? Dr. Gay Canough, ETM Solar Works explains...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSuRoa9Duco
Jeremy Rifkin - The Empathic Civilisation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-7BjeHepbA
Terry Gross Juliet Eilerpin Thursday, February 02, 2012
Clean-Tech Industry Facing Lean Times After Solyndra
http://www.npr.org/2012/02/02/146280685/clean-tech-industry-facing-lean-times-after-solyndra
http://www.npr.org/programs/fresh-air/
Solar Renewable Credit Program
http://open.nysenate.gov/legislation/bill/A5713-2011
New York Solar Industry Development & Jobs Act of 2011 S.5713/S.4178
http://votesolar.org/new-york-solar-jobs-act-of-2011/
Solar energy relies on a host of resources that take large amounts of petrochemicals to extract, process and transport. Many of the by-products of solar panel production are quite toxic. Most of the solar panel producers are owned by the worst offenders of the oil and chemical Corporations.
Solar power isn't as 'green' as you think.
Not true! Military going green to save lives, money
By Phyllis Cuttino, Special to CNN
http://www.cnn.com/2011/09/22/opinion/cuttino-military-green/index.html
You are sorry. And your crocodile tears and false declarations are sorry as well. Just because you refuse to acknowledge reality and try to shape the choices people make for your paycheck does not change the facts- all power on earth is solar power. You are simple and plain. A LIAR.
Clearly you are an expert on wishful thinking- whenever someone uses time to provide info to you it is a waste of time. Your claims of safe nuclear, and there is no alternative except coal, have no basis in fact, reality, or even in wishful thinking- just what is your motivation for promoting lies? Is it the money? By the way- I did not make any claim, and have no obligation to educate you- you are educated, but have allied yourself with your enemies.
As evidenced by your comments, you utterly lack imagination...the sign of a weak and/or lazy mind.
Not true! Just NOT true. Try viewing the links I posted. Be more specific about oil and chemical corporations that produce solar panels.
You are sadly misinformed. Please check out Natcore Technologies. They have current technology to reduce energy use and pollution by toxic chemicals, for the manufacturing process. Furthermore they have more technology yet to be funded that can halve the cost of solar, and double the efficiency.
GALEN - Is it as green as nuclear power? How about coal fired generation? Maybe it is your "think" that isn't as green as you think.
I'm pretty sure almost every 'alt.energy' option from solar to wind to biomass has a dark cloud of petrochemicals hanging around in the background. Nuclear is the nightmare option (as Fukushima has most recently proved. Again.), and the long cherished dream of fusion is constantly 'sixty years in the future'.
The ONLY viable option for human survival, and the continued existence of a habitable biosphere is to wean ourselves off the hydrocarbon tit, abandon the ingrained mental illness of 'Civilization', and allow nature to cull the human species to a survivable population.
Your comments are only coherent if you believe in zero consumption. Every product requires energy and material to produce it. Think farming, think clothing. The point is to make the best choices possible, and between fossils and solar,wind,tide there is only one rational option. Yes some solar panels are made by oil companies, my Arcos are thirty years old, is it bad to use them? A rose is a rose. Yes least amount of harm is the path, least destruction least waste and poisons again nothing out does solar wind etc.Do you propose to not implement computers because they require material and energy to produce, should we stick with only TV's or should we progress from TV's to computers and recycle TV's?
So you've given up on our survival as a species, Galen?
What the hell is the matter with so many environmentalists?
Here again, we have a prominent environmentalist ASSUMING that they have stopped the Keystone pipeline when, IN FACT,
Obama decided NOT to make a decision to stop the pipeline and that lack of decision is now allowing the corrupt congress to make his decision for him.
We do not need desperate delusions.
As pointed out in this article, Obama is NOT a friend of environmentalists. He merely manipulates people because he (and this is true of his party, just like their republican allies) is a corporate tool of Wall Street.
Wake up!
No one has put a "Stop" to the Keystone pipeline.
You beat me to this exact point.
Ditto!
Manysummits
====
Me as well...
NOT ME. The protests have had an effect, we must continue to fight, not give up and badger those brave enough to make stand. So the gist of your criticism is: it hasn't worked so roll over and give up the ass. Or are you really calling on people to join in the struggle, and make every effort to stop the industrial capitalist machine? Maybe I missed it in the cogent set of action items you all have presented?
"PostScarcityAna..."
No one said anything against protesting.
The problem I addressed is the common tendency to assume that the pipeline has been stopped.
The actions in the congress right now show that the pipeline is still very likely to be built.
Nowhere did the Obama administration say anything against the pipeline. To believe otherwise is to delude yourself and THAT is a very dangerous thing to pat yourself on the back for doing.
Giving Obama and Company credit for doing something they did not do seems very desperate and must not be supported if you are serious about this (or any other) issue.
Without accuracy, we make ourselves into drones.
I am giving credit to the activists. No where have I supported Obama, here in "cyberspace" or on the planet earth at any time. I am highlighting that these actions build community, and solidarity between communities. I am not patting myself on the back, or Jeff Biggers for that matter, I am saying these are people self identifying as activists and leaders. The gov't and the oligarchy is using this info, we should to, and SUPPORT coordinated action- not DISPARAGE. We have not stopped the pipeline, MTR, or nuclear power- but we will. It is only up to us to find community, share knowledge, and fight for what we want: Ending Industrial Capitalist Class Society.
We have a voice in our government. Stand up for a green economy. Stand up to the 1% corporate lobbiest. Stop whining and get active.
Actually, i have been 'active' on many fronts for quite a few years. And i still 'whine'. They are not mutually exclusive responses........And,
The delusion of having stopped the pipeline is a credible point. Obamabots can't seem to get it through their messianic minds that he isn't the 'change you can believe in'. And, while i am here and on the subject. I would appreciate it if anyone who was a big obama supporter in 2008 could please (and i am quite sincere about this), explain to me what that slogan actually means/meant. I found it to be rather disturbingly Orwellian at the time. But i am interested in hearing how it was interpreted by those whom it actually moved. And i know there are quite a few here at CD who indeed were so moved.
I was never an Obamabot of course, but I simply assumed that it meant "change that you can enthusiastically support instead of dread". And there certainly was a lot of dreadful change during the Bush years.
I always expected to be underwhelmed by Obama - but not like this. Along with just a few other political memories in my lifetime, I will never forget how socially isolated I felt because I had aboslutely no feeling of any need to joyfully cry and hug everyone like they were doing in Grant Park and even parts of Pittsburgh on that November night in '08.
Don't I wish Obama had stopped the Keystone pipeline. He didn't. Don't I hope that Obama will regulate the banks, stop funding endless wars, honor the Constitution, support Medicare for all, protect Social Security benefits, get us off oil, restore CCC and WPA and put Americans to work, repeal NAFTA and get our manufacturing jobs back, repeal the Patriot Act, repeal the NDAA of 2012 that does away with our rights under the Magna Carta, Habeus corpus, Posse Comitatus and the sixth amendment to the Constitution. Don't I want him to stop being such a willing servant of the banking 'industry' (as if they make anything but debt). Don't I wish he had any compassion for the families thrown out of work, thrown out of their homes, and having a hard time living on the streets with no health care or adequate food for their families?
YES! I want these things but the sad fact is OBAMA DOESN'T! Now, I admit the crop of Republicans going against him are awful---but, we don't have to vote for only a D or an R. There are other political parties and there are other candidates standing up. Please consider Rocky Anderson. Never heard of him? Go google him and see what you think.
Every 40 minutes enough solar power strikes the earth to power "civilisation" on that day. Yes there is draw backs to producing products but unlike many products once a panel is built it produces power for decades with no material input. Please investigate the ways other than batteries to store power and of course most power demand is during the daytime. Also if Suburu can build a car with no waste I would think panels could be also. Wind Turbines are as cost efficient as coal and last many years. Fossil fuels while toxic in every aspect also demand continuous input in transport, drilling,mining, ports, pipelines, wars, environmental and health costs. Fossil Fuels can in no way bare comparison to Wind, Solar and Tidal energies. Opposition to Renewables is due only to Greed and/or ignorance.Oilybomber signed the first license to import Tar Oil into the USA. Biggers is in a fantasy with Mr.350
I am no engineer, so maybe I am way off base, but I don't know why energy can't be stored as simply as having a dual purpose motor/generator using spare energy at peak solar hours turn a screw which lifts a weight increasing the weight's potential energy. Then when the sun goes down, the weight then descends, turning the screw, and drives the generator producing electricity. True there would be loss due to friction, but it would be clean. But I'm no engineer...
There is ongoing design work and prototyping of highly efficient near frictionless high speed flywheels spinning on magnetic floating bearings in a vacuum canister, for use as energy storage devices.
Interesting, thank you.
Yes, the very cryptic description of an Inertial Battery. This device is already in use in millions of cars, and the "ongoing work" has many patents already granted. The problem is not in the application of engineering, it is in the application of human will. Also, I would like to reinsert a contrary position about Obama and the keystone protests: These protests HAVE been effective (we are discussing it right now, rather than the super bowl), and all of the naysayers I ask you this: why didn't you get involved and Make It Successful (especially in light of your prescience)? It is called fighting for what you want, what are you fighting for? Or are you even fighting back yet? Please read: Murray Bookchin- Post Scarcity Anarchism
Simply because it is naive and futile to work within a totalitarian system. Relying on demonstrations has led to a compete imperial fascist federal government, it is just some are in serious denial of the fascist state. What the naysayers are saying is Biggers etc, are deluded if they think as they claim they stopped the pipeline, Before one acts one must shed delusions, Occupy is about replacing not repairing.
Are you seriously positing that the action of mass protest by people "led to a compete (sic) imperial fascist federal government."? Industrial Capitalism created the situation we are in, not activists nor protests. Just what tactics are you endorsing? Do you classify the Occupy movement as a demonstration? What about all of the activism that led to: The 40 hour week. The Weekend. Abolition of Jim Crow Laws. etc . etc . etc . etc.......
You are deluded if you think the Occupy movement is not a demonstration- it is a demonstration of our power, it is a demonstration of rights, it is a demonstration of humanity. That is exactly how we have won all of the crumbs I have mentioned above, and it is how we will win out over the oligarchs. What is your plan again?
Zero and 412, way to go. Add H2 and O2 storage from electrolysis and storage in salts in mines and caves. Can you believe there were people in 2012 who did not wholeheartedly embrace renewables other than oil executives?
What about building community and solidarity between Appalachia and the Keystone Protest movement? Can you believe there were people in 2012 who would deride activists and journalists working to stop the cogs of industrial capitalism? Other than provocateurs, and agitators for oil executives?
The MTR mining in Ms. Blanton's area is quite stunning as I learned from a recent trip there. Upon topping the crest of Pine Mountain on US 119, one is greeted with a view of the north end Black Mountain (presumably named for long logged-off spruce forests that once grew there) on the Virginia border, being destroyed from top to bottom - an enormous highwall at the top resembling something from the Utah monument valley and the slopes, including every cove and hollow down below, now an expanse of angle-of-repose rock rubble - 2000 vertical feet or more. I could tell that even the conservative Republican I was traveling with was disturbed as well, and perhaps his silence was revealing an effort at rationalizing what he saw. Me, I just kept my mouth shut becasue he is my immediate supervisor.
Then there is the damage you don't see, the dissolved metals that will leach from the rubble and render the surface and ground water unusable for drinking and often even most aquatic life for effectively forever on the human time scale.
Anyone seeing a large MTR operation (I've been to a few) cannot but be emotionally disturbed by it. The only difference is how one reacts to the emotions. A pro- "free enterprise" type will search for rationalizations, others will simply be outraged that something like this, which only accounts for a few percent of US coal consumption, in an area containing the most diverse temperate-zone forests in the world, was ever allowed.
But thankfully, the subject of our trip was an underground mine. This tempered my depression somewhat.
Fortunately, most of Harlan County itself has been spared the scourge of MTR mining - the old underground mines of that historic district have already taken the coal from beneath Black and Little Black Mountains. This area is rich in labor-struggle history and mountain culture which few Harlan Countiers even know nowadays. Nest time I'm there, I'll ask random people under 40 or so if they have ever heard of the song "Whch Side Are You On?" There is probably not a single union mine left in the county. Nobody plays fiddles mandolins or banjos anymore either. But I am digressing...
Your last sentence calls into question you whole comment- many people play fiddles,mandolins, and banjos still; especially in Appalachia. But I am digressing, it is also interesting that you often promote nuclear fired generation as the only alternative to coal fired generation; but this comment you posted suggests you WORK in the coal industry, and you are too afraid of losing your paycheck to quit-or even disturb your Supervisor's reverie. So "which side are you on?", maybe I am wrong but I often hear your voice in the choir. Not at a protest. Which union do you belong to?
Do you live in Appalachia? Where? I've lived in or just outside the Appalachian Region all my life - from Chattanooga to Pittsburgh. Aside from some small enclaves of generational returnees from the north (especially Michigan), mostly well outside the coalfields (Whitesburg and WMMT radio being the lone exception), few people in Appalachia take up the regions traditions anymore. Everyone knows this.
The new traditions are ATV riding, oxy-contin, meth, Jesus, more ATV riding, sugary soft drinks and obesity (sale of alcohol is still illegal in nearly all of E. Kentucky), and what passes for "country music" these days.
I belong the the AFGE Local 644 (soon to be shop-steward). I am just a government ant who has no control over coal mining, only to assure that if it is done, it is done as safely as possible. I have no intention of quitting; I have bills to pay. The federal workplace is in many ways an egalitarian model of a post-capitalist workplace - comparable to the Basque Mondragons. At 55, it would be pretty difficult to get another job in this current economic mileau anyway. But if an opening comes up, I might return to working for the Corps of Engineers.
But unlike some of my co-workers, I have no intention of having anything to do with coal when I retire.
I have been to too many protests - in Pittsburgh, DC, and New York, to keep count.
You wouldn't happen to be a Bloomfield/Pittsburgh anarchist, aren't you? I hate the anonymity of this forum.
My name is Mack Coyle- I live in NC, USA. I am not a Bloomberg/Pittsburgh anarchist. I am an inventor, carpenter, plumber, father, son, friend, antagonist, - I am a human being. What is your name? I have been an activist my entire life, I grew up in Berkeley,CA,USA. The addictions you place in the category of 'new traditions' are manifestations of the oligarch industrial capitalism, they are not from the wellspring of the human joy experience. Can you recommend a good book? I have one for you.....
It's Bloomfield. It's an old Italian neighborhood in Pittsburgh which has seen a goodly number of anarchists settle there becasue of its community-solidarity, amenability to car-free living (or, at least until the massive public transit cuts come later this year) and cheap cost of living. This is what it looks like:
http://i109.photobucket.com/albums/n77/PJD123/BloomfieldSmallJPG.jpg
In recognition of the Italian heritage, the theme song of Pittsburgh anti-war resistance in past years, played by the now disbanded "Breakaway Marching Band" at all the marches was "Bella Ciao" (Chumabawamba's lyrics).
I was assuming your (truncated) nick was "PostScarcityAnarchist" Is it PostScarcityAnalyst?
The Blue Ridge of North Carolina and Virginia, or the Virginia -to-Pennsylvania Ridge-and-Valley country is a very different (and somewhat gentrified) place compared to less picturesque "other" Appalachia - the coalfields. And the "Appalayscheeans" of New England are culturally another planet! Pittsburgh is the Paris of the ugly Appalachia of coal, boney-piles, slurry-dams, slag piles, rust, and now fracking.
My name is Paul and it should be clear by now where I live. Based on my nick and the things I write, anyone in my local area who "needs to know" knows who I am.
Hello Paul, it is nice to finally meet you.
How on earth could we curb the wanton waste of energy? The only way I see is to raise the price of energy to a point where we actually care about our consumption. The local businesses all have their front doors wide open in the middle of winter. Over sized pick-up trucks are rarely seen with any load on them at all. A new grocery store in town was built with a ceiling 40 feet tall and yes it is impressive but all that wasted space has to be heated. Why are there 4 street lights on my block which only has 5 houses? All the thermometers in the thermometer section at the hardware store all say 76 degrees. The lady at my local plumbing and heating place told me that she keeps her house at 80 degrees because she is most comfortable in shorts and a t-shirt. A couple in our city built an 8000 square foot "house" and they are the only residents; when my cousin was in town he stopped there because he thought it was a hotel. The program to help make our home more energy efficient has been scrapped. Nobody where I work can figure out how the programmable thermostat is programmed and so the offices stay at a steady 72 degrees at all times and the attic hatch is missing so all the heat just goes up and out of the building. Why is it that there is so little conversation about energy conservation?
>>Thumper wrote: "Why is it that there is so little conversation about energy conservation?"<<
Yes, indeed! Conservation should top the list of items on action on climate change. But real conservation, in my book, is to drastically scale down the demand for energy starting with simply giving up activities and indulgences that are not necessary for a healthy life.
In a country like the US and Canada, the list of things that can be simply given up or boycotted while saving enormous amounts of energy is just too long. Getting large numbers of people to boycott wasteful and non-essential activities that also support the empire in various ways would be an effective means for taking action on multiple fronts. Think Super Bowl, NASCAR, Las Vegas, Disneyland, NHL, etc. Think overheated/overcooled malls, escalators running non-stop, open freezers at supermarkets, patio heaters, etc.
The only way to shut down the coal power plants, that make up about 45% of the electricity generation capacity in the US is by drastic demand reduction. Installing renewable energy systems in such large capacities, besides being expensive, is also no guarantee that the coal power plants will be shut down, unless there is legislation that mandates the shutting down of coal power plants with a timetable. It is time to fight for such legislation, while understanding the utter criticality of and taking action on demand reduction.
Renewable energy systems should NOT become "additional" capacity. They should **replace** coal power plants. And that won't happen in the absence of suitable legislation and massive demand reduction!
Alcyon, your correct in many ways. One point coal plants ARE being replaced by renewables, driven by the cost of coal plants meeting clean air standards, (see San Juan Power Plant New Mexico). Of course the fascist governors installed by Koch etc. are opposing fossils bearing the total cost of fossil fuel. Of course as we see the earth and humans cannot bear the cost of fossils, next to which renewables is miniscule.
No, Coal generation is in decline but it is mostly being replaced by natural gas generators. The Marcellus and other shale gas reserves have driven down the price if natural gas.
There is a goodly amount of wind turbines going in, near where I live, on wind-rich western PA/MD/WV plateau. But this may come to an abrupt end if government incentives are allowed to expire.
So true about energy waste.
USAns have been indoctrinated to deliberately waste energy with incredible gusto. That same woman who keeps her home at 80F in winter will air-condition it down to 68F in summer. They will say that it is for their comfort, but in reality, some really dark, Edward Bernays-ian corporate brainwashing forces are at work.
What about driving price up by Fiat? You are opposing activities you have no hope of curtailing- write that in your report tonight. As for your assurances - thanks.