EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Presidential Hypocrisy on School Reform
Black Agenda Radio commentary
During his recent State of the Union address, President Obama made a particularly cynical reference to teachers and public education when he called for an end to the demonization of teachers, and teaching to standardized tests. The reference was cynical because these are the very hallmarks of the Obama administration's policies on public education. But since billionaire owners of corporate media are wholly on board, the contradiction between a few paragraphs in a speech and three years of actual policy went unmentioned in all the analyses of the the speech.
For three years Barack Obama and his Secretary of Education Arne Duncan have been “demonizers in chief” toward the nation's public school teachers. Their so-called “Race To The Top” for public education awards funding to states and school districts on the basis of how many teachers' salaries are directly tied to test scores, how many qualified and experienced teachers are fired, how many public schools and whole districts are “turned around” to be run like businesses by business people rather than by educators, parents, and communities, like the best schools always have been run.
As CEO of Chicago's Public Schools Arne Duncan, now Secretary of Education fired hundreds of qualified, experienced, mostly black teachers rooted in the communities they served, so they could be replaced by younger, cheaper, less qualified and mostly white recruits who could be expected to teach for a little while and move on. A US federal court found Duncan guilty of racial discrimination and ordered Chicago to come up with a plan to rehire the fired teachers.
When in December news of a new wave of 2012 school closings and attendant mass firings leaked out, hundreds of Chicago public school parents staged a two-day occupation of City Hall and the mayor's office, something not seen in 25 years, but virtually whited out by local and national media. Chicago police eventually cleared City Hall, the Chicago Sun-Times reported, by closing down the washrooms and refusing to re-admit anyone who left. But the paper did not disclose why parents were encamped outside the mayor's office.
Also in December stories surfaced confirming longstanding rumors that Mayor Rahm Emanuel habitually used public and/or campaign funds to hire local black preachers and rented protesters by the busload to pack public meetings and exclude the real public, and to picket in favor of whatever City Hall and the Board of Education favored on a particular day.
Since then, and for the entire month of January, Chicago mayor and former White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel has dodged reporters and limited his press availability to avoid answering questions about the wave proposed school closings, and the use of rented preachers and protesters to thwart and make less visible the rising tide of opposition to corporate school reform. But despite the mayor's silence, the media's cooperation and the president's duplicity, the tide of opposition to corporate school reform continues to rise.
For more information on the national movement against corporate school reform, visit Substance News on the web at substancenews.net.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


19 Comments so far
Show AllA good article, BUT
Has Black Agenda Report come out and said that NO ONE should vote for any corporate candidates, be they republican, democrat, or libertarian?
Are they putting their support clearly behind a Green (or other) party candidate?
They could make a big difference if they did.
Especially since Team Obama, in addition to demonizing teachers, has demonized nearly everything progressive while serially promoting regressive legislation on all fronts.
As "Team Obama" said in 2008 when he voted for FISA "The Left (actually, I think it was something like 'ACLU types' or perhaps both) has no where else to go"
No, of course not. Nor should they.
You are assuming that commentary, criticism and analysis are subordinate to electoral politics. The reverse is true.
The notion that political criticism, analysis, and action are only valuable when and if they are harnessed to partisan electoral politics is the same logic as "studying for the test" as an educational approach, as though the test were the point of education. Insisting that all things political be tightly held within the context of partisan electoral politics corrupts all movements for social and political change in the same way that studying for the test corrupts education.
Elections are an effect of social and political change and never a cause of social and political change. Political criticism, analysis, and action are, on the other hand, causes of social and political change.
We have seen desperate attempts recently to co-opt various forces into partisan electoral politics. The Madison protesters were told to go home and work on a problematic, weak and short-sighted recall campaign. OWS is constantly badgered in a similar manner. The purpose of harnessing anything and everything to partisan electoral politics is to thwart any possibility for change, to nip any resistance movements in the bud and channel them safely back into the fold of politics as usual.
There is no possible way to "make a big difference" within the confines of partisan electoral politics. The Abolitionists knew this, the Suffragettes knew this, organized Labor knew this, the Civil Rights movement knew this.
"You are assuming that commentary, criticism and analysis are subordinate to electoral politics. The reverse is true."
I completely agree. I would add "organizing" to "commentary, criticism and analysis", as you have in your last paragraph. I am not saying that electoral politics should be ignored, as voting is a right I would like to preserve. But electoral results are more like an assessment of what has been done, learned and accomplished than an accomplishment in themselves.
Yours is an excellent analysis, Two Americas. I hope you don't mind if I quote you to my friends.
Yes, feel free to use anything I write here.
TA,
You are an excellent teacher.
I noticed a poster asked your permission to quote you. Well, I must confess that I have been quoting you for the past several months without your expressed permission. Hope you don't mind TA.
A sincere thank you from this forum's recovering house slave. Still bound but definitely on my way to freedom.
Thomas Gilbert-
You are being very generous. Thank you for the kind words.
You absolutely have my permission to use anything I write here.
I didn't know that TA was a teacher. No matter, he's pretty good even when he disagrees on lots of issues. For a teacher, he does pretty well and he's not mean even when attacked. I feel kind of bad that too many posters have been mean to him but I like the way he handles all kinds of verbal blows. It's as if he took training courses in verbal judo and saw to it that he'd never fall for verbal karate even when under attack. I used to be one of those who'd react and feel good at first only to regret burning one too many bridges. Can't say I'm always successful but I try to improve and learn from guys like him. For this, I also add my thanks to TA for without him, discussions here would be worse. That and we've lost some good people on this forum.
Hi Max,
I said this many times before, we are fortunate to have several excellent thinkers/writers participate here on these CD comment threads. TA is without question one of those thinkers/writers
I tell people here on cd that my purpose for coming here is to learn. (the shut up and listen method) Such a purpose makes everyone who contributes to this site my teacher. That was my meaning when I referred to TA as a teacher. An excellent teacher.
Max, keep on writing. You are also one of my teachers.
Take care
Thomas Gilbert-
Thanks Dante and I think you're also a great teacher. I can't guarantee that I'll always make it but I'll try. A good balance of writing, reading, and vacationing seems to work.
One thing that I think amazes us is that progressive forums cost less but serve as a platform for continuing education which could prove invaluable to our younger generation. It'll never be the same as in person interaction at schools but could improve overtime with the possibility of online holograms.
BA, I think he's for direct democracy
http://blackagendareport.com/content/how-waste-your-vote-2012
Direct democracy could be an answer to one huge problem blocking real democracy: our focus on bought and paid for politicians and their invented personalities.
Let's take the important matter of health care as an example. Many of us who preferred single payer believed the corporate employee - the charismatic, "community organizing" politician - when he said single payer would become a reality if and when Democrats control the WH and Congress. He lied. We ended up with a corporate designed system, not at all what the majority of Americans had in mind. If we had a system where unbiased facts are collected and displayed - via a well monitored, citizen run, wiki system? - and had been able to vote on the issue, we'd have a much better health care bill than the one we got.
Glory is the day when we rid ourselves of having to vote for corporate sales models with their invented personalities and sappy anecdotal histories, crap that often passes for news! Personally, I'm sick of seeing these phonies get so much attention, while the most important issues facing us and the entire planet are either buried or thoroughly misrepresented. I can barely stomach watching these models flash their winning smiles at the cameras and speak their calculated lies and would love to see a more direct and honest system take their place. I know ... dream on.
This may be a start: http://ni4d.us/
Presidential Hypocrisy on just about everything he said during his campaign.
How people can still support this POS is beyond me.
Obama - kick progressives in the teeth for 3 years - then trot out some halfway nice sounding promises -
Then Obama will step back from his promises and when asked why by the teachers unions derisively insult them -
Par for the course for this constitution destroying Bankster buddy in the white house.....
POS indeed - democrats are displaying massive Cognitive Dissonance.
Yet still we have Arne Duncan and race to the top.
"...- kick progressives in the teeth..." How about kick the American people in the teeth?
Good article as usual. It focuses on what political operatives are doing and how ordinary people are not falling for it, and are resisting. These are the key elements that are needed and missing from most reporting, which now focuses on the horse race aspects of elections.
I hope that we can focus on the actions by Obama and other elected officials and their corporate rulers, rather than attacking Obama the individual (corporate tool that he is). It is still good to point out the distance, and difference in direction, between rhetoric and effort.
I say this only because after hundreds of years of slavery and maltreatment, there was such jubilation among African-Americans when Obama was elected. Many, both black and white. will find it difficult to overcome the emotional cost of seeing the Great Hope as so worthless. I will certainly not lift a finger to elect any one of the current crop of presidential candidates, but we need not hurl insults. We cannot ignore emotions of ordinary people in our political discourse.