Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- In Blind Poll, Republicans Choose Progressive Budget Solutions Over Their Own Party's
- Not Guilty By Virtue of Videotape, Which, Unlike the Police, Doesn't Lie
- The 'Land of 10,000 Lakes' Is Running Dry
- Manning: Before Wikileaks, Leaked Docs Offered to NYT, WaPo
- Bob Woodward Embodies US Political Culture in a Single Outburst
Popular content
Today's Top News
Corporations Have No Use for Borders
What happened to Canada? It used to be the country we would flee to if life in the United States became unpalatable. No nuclear weapons. No huge military-industrial complex. Universal health care. Funding for the arts. A good record on the environment.
But that was the old Canada. I was in Montreal on Friday and Saturday and saw the familiar and disturbing tentacles of the security and surveillance state. Canada has withdrawn from the Kyoto Accords so it can dig up the Alberta tar sands in an orgy of environmental degradation. It carried out the largest mass arrests of demonstrators in Canadian history at 2010’s G-8 and G-20 meetings, rounding up more than 1,000 people. It sends undercover police into indigenous communities and activist groups and is handing out stiff prison terms to dissenters. And Canada’s Prime Minister Stephen Harper is a diminished version of George W. Bush. He champions the rabid right wing in Israel, bows to the whims of global financiers and is a Christian fundamentalist.
"Our solidarity should be with activists who march on Tahrir Square in Cairo or set up encampamentos in Madrid. These are our true compatriots." (photo: Pascal Marchand)
The voices of dissent sound like our own. And the forms of persecution are familiar. This is not an accident. We are fighting the same corporate leviathan.
“I want to tell you that I was arrested because I am seen as a threat,” Canadian activist Leah Henderson wrote to fellow dissidents before being sent to Vanier prison in Milton, Ontario, to serve a 10-month sentence. “I want to tell you that you might be too. I want to tell you that this is something we need to prepare for. I want to tell you that the risk of incarceration alone should not determine our organizing.”
“My skills and experience—as a facilitator, as a trainer, as a legal professional and as someone linking different communities and movements—were all targeted in this case, with the state trying to depict me as a ‘brainwasher’ and as a mastermind of mayhem, violence and destruction,” she went on. “During the week of the G8 & G20 summits, the police targeted legal observers, street medics and independent media. It is clear that the skills that make us strong, the alternatives that reduce our reliance on their systems and prefigure a new world, are the very things that they are most afraid of.”
The decay of Canada illustrates two things. Corporate power is global, and resistance to it cannot be restricted by national boundaries. Corporations have no regard for nation-states. They assert their power to exploit the land and the people everywhere. They play worker off of worker and nation off of nation. They control the political elites in Ottawa as they do in London, Paris and Washington. This, I suspect, is why the tactics to crush the Occupy movement around the globe have an eerie similarity—infiltrations, surveillance, the denial of public assembly, physical attempts to eradicate encampments, the use of propaganda and the press to demonize the movement, new draconian laws stripping citizens of basic rights, and increasingly harsh terms of incarceration.
Our solidarity should be with activists who march on Tahrir Square in Cairo or set up encampamentos in Madrid. These are our true compatriots. The more we shed ourselves of national identity in this fight, the more we grasp that our true allies may not speak our language or embrace our religious and cultural traditions, the more powerful we will become.
Those who seek to discredit this movement employ the language of nationalism and attempt to make us fearful of the other. Wave the flag. Sing the national anthem. Swell with national hubris. Be vigilant of the hidden terrorist. Canada’s Minister of Natural Resources Joe Oliver, responding to the growing opposition to the Keystone XL and the Northern Gateway pipelines, wrote in an open letter that “environmental and other radical groups” were trying to “hijack our regulatory system to achieve their radical ideological agenda.” He accused pipeline opponents of receiving funding from foreign special interest groups and said that “if all other avenues have failed, they will take a quintessential American approach: sue everyone and anyone to delay the project even further.”
No matter that in both Canada and the United States suing the government to seek redress is the right of every citizen. No matter that the opposition to the Keystone XL and Northern Gateway pipelines has its roots in Canada. No matter that the effort by citizens in the U.S. and in Canada to fight climate change is about self-preservation. The minister, in the pocket of the fossil fuel industry like the energy czars in most of the other industrialized nations, seeks to pit “loyal” Canadians against “disloyal” Canadians. Those with whom we will build this movement of resistance will not in some cases be our own. They may speak Arabic, pray five times a day toward Mecca and be holding off the police thugs in the center of Cairo. Or they may be generously pierced and tattooed and speak Danish or they may be Mandarin-speaking workers battling China’s totalitarian capitalism. These are differences that make no difference.
“My country right or wrong,” G.K. Chesterton once wrote, is on the same level as “My mother, drunk or sober.”
Our most dangerous opponents, in fact, look and speak like us. They hijack familiar and comforting iconography and slogans to paint themselves as true patriots. They claim to love Jesus. But they cynically serve the function a native bureaucracy serves for any foreign colonizer. The British and the French, and earlier the Romans, were masters of this game. They recruited local quislings to carry out policies and repression that were determined in London or Paris or Rome. Popular anger was vented against these personages, and native group vied with native group in battles for scraps of influence. And when one native ruler was overthrown or, more rarely, voted out of power, these imperial machines recruited a new face. The actual centers of power did not change. The pillage continued. Global financiers are the new colonizers. They make the rules. They pull the strings. They offer the illusion of choice in our carnivals of political theater. But corporate power remains constant and unimpeded. Barack Obama serves the same role Herod did in imperial Rome.
This is why the Occupy Wall Street movement is important. It targets the center of power—global financial institutions. It deflects attention from the empty posturing in the legislative and executive offices in Washington or London or Paris. The Occupy movement reminds us that until the corporate superstructure is dismantled it does not matter which member of the native elite is elected or anointed to rule. The Canadian prime minister is as much a servant of corporate power as the American president. And replacing either will not alter corporate domination. As the corporate mechanisms of control become apparent to wider segments of the population, discontent will grow further. So will the force employed by our corporate overlords. It will be a long road for us. But we are not alone. There are struggles and brush fires everywhere. Leah Henderson is not only right. She is my compatriot.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



74 Comments so far
Show AllStep #1 in fighting the capitalist power is silencing the lie machinery, media.
It is media that carries the lies into homes, instills false fear of the others, glorifies violence, makes trivia appear relevant, and sends consciousness into slumber.
Funny you should say that. Iexployer stopped working 4xs trying to view page/comment in re: DC occupy article/video today. Maybe alt will work. Soon will have to rely on word of mouth. How will the facts get out to the people in timely manner?
Eliminating one of the most important freedoms in our republic, the freedom of the press (media) is no solution. And the media, like the politicians, are just servants of the masters.
The only effective solution is to de-legitimize and disempower the masters - the transnational corporations which have twisted the Constitution to protect their "rights" at the expense of We the People.
And the only way to accomplish that is with a Constitutional Amendment, the People's Rights Amendment, which removes corporations from the Constitution and Bill of Rights and subjects them to democratic control.
I didn't say people shouldn't share information.
Media today is brainwash and I didn't hear that on the news.
Do you really think putting corporations under democratic control will cure today's ailments? Make that little change and all will be fine? What if everyone votes for Fox News?
Are you suggesting that the internet doesn't contain lies and propaganda, any less than the main-stream media? The Web is merely a more democratically-available propaganda mill.
It's you who are creating a straw man to cut down. I, of course, did not say that reversing corporate personhood will cure all that ails us. But it will correct much of the power imbalance in today's America.
Jefferson, Madison, and others among the Founders and Framers knew that control of corporations was just as important as control of government. Jefferson insisted on an 11th Amendment to restrain corporate power. It failed then, but we now have the opportunity to finish what he started.
"The Web is merely a more democratically-available propaganda mill."
i agree. all information (whether in MSM or on an obscure website) should be scrutinized and cross referenced before it's accepted as truth (or reasonable truth).
"Jefferson insisted on an 11th Amendment to restrain corporate power."
it's interesting to hypothesize what america would have looked like had the government exercised some control over corps. do you have a reference i could follow regarding jefferson's desire to check corporations ?
...peace...
The headline is incorrect. Corporations do have important uses for borders: to divide us, distract us, control us, and destroy our movements, our organizations, our liberty, our hope.
No borders, just our little planet and one race (human)
Exactly. Borders impede the mobility of labor, but not capital.
Yes, borders are 'rights free' zones for citizens -- border guards can do whatever they want to you when you are attempting to traverse a border - harass you with strip searches (physical and electronic), warrant-less searches of your computer/cell phone/MP3 player etc - so the border guards can feed you to the RIAA's lawyers...
All lot of really nasty corporate written legislation that is very difficult to enforce and has very low compliance among citizens is enforced with a vengeance at border crossings to terrorize citizens. Apparently, they learned this from the Israelis who endlessly screw the Palestinians this way.
Bush didn't deport anyone cause by allowing cheap/crack labor to come over the border they could bust unions and even bring back child labor. Obama has deported about 1.5 million people. Corporations would love no boarders. No borders - no import duty.
Reality doesn't jive with your statement.
Boeders also protect us. Or should protect us. It is our "no border" under the table, policy with Mexico that has caused a crisis with labor in the US. The cheap labor invasion has wiped out workers rights. Cheap labor is eroding bargaining, unions, minimum wage (which is below poverty now), work safety, 40 hour week. They even want to bring back child labor, not to mention the sucking sound on social services, medical care, and education.
Yours are the comments that do not "jive with reality." It is PRECISELY the corporate use and abuse of borders that produces this "cheap labor invasion!" Wake up and remove the scales from your eyes.
And remove the bigotry from your brain. We do not need to be "protected" from workers seeking a living wage, we need universal protection of the right to work and a global minimum wage that provides a decent standard of living so no one has to flee their home for artificial reasons. We need protection from investors and corporate predators who happily manipulate nation-states and markets to "erode bargaining, unions, minimum wage, work safety, 40 hour week," destroy local communities and national economies, and create mass migrations because it suits their inhuman bottom line.
The sucking sound you hear is the corporate hogs feeding at the trough. They LOVE useful idiots like you who repeat their ugly propaganda, and mis-direct blame off of the perpetrators onto the victims of their crimes..
You are the one undermining labor. But I will not sink to calling names. Hey! Borders are good. Some countries see freedom as chaos. They would rather have their mosques and burqas rather than elections and know Victoria's Secret. You want to live like that? But if it's their right as a country to have their own culture there needs to be a border so people know what the rules are where they are standing.
It is simple to think that if there were no borders there would be no differences. I don't ever see the whole world ever living together as long as there are different cultures. You must wipe out the cultures first. That is what the US is best at.
I am not corporate. I lost my job at a concrete company because of day laborers. I don't see how giving them my job helped anyone. Explain that to me. You are so intelligent and I am such an idiot.
And by the way, we were doing really very well with workers rights and unions until NAFTA removed all the labor borders.
Yeah, and the corporations, they were opposed to NAFTA right? Get a clue! You are being played like a fiddle.
YEAH! NAFTA got rid of the borders, disaster - getting rid of borders - disaster are you getting it yet? So it finally sunk in!
OR you are just a corporate wolf in sheep's clothing.
So you want to play stupid. OK. You just go right on shilling for the corporations who so vastly benefit from the current system, and you go right ahead and BLAME THE VICTIMS for the corporate predation that is the rule. i won't be wasting any more time with you. Good day!
Big business wanted NAFTA. Unions were against it because they knew what was going to happen.......and it actually did happen.
the question is, how do people in the 21st century effectively revolt against their leaders? the occupy movement is advocating nonviolent civil disobedience. it is the only civil, semi-legal remedy that can be discussed. it is not kosher to openly advocate overthrowing the government. we can only mass together and hopefully slow down/shut down the machinations of power.
they (the elites) will resist, as they are resisting the demands of the masses as expressed by occupy movements, every step of the way. it's a continuum - consciousness raising, petitioning the powers that be w/ that knowledge - revolution.
as they beat our compatriots down (as they did last night in oakland), people will look for more extreme methods of resistance. the efforts of anonymous attacking inet infrastructure - the desire of occupiers to occupy unused private space - the willingness to fight back. it's inevitable, we've seen it before. if 2000 people cannot secure a building for public space (400 arrested in oakland) in california - how many people would it take (a crowd) to occupy a single building anywhere in america ?
their property and assets are vulnerable - they will pull all of the stops out to prevent demonstrators from occupying/destroying their property.
human life is more precious than a piece of paper. return the commons to the people. let them call us names - so be it.
http://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/images/cocktail.jpg
...peace...
iowablackbird, Good points. Last night as I was listening to KGO radio in the SF Bay Area, and heard yet another 'news update' about the 'violence' of Oakland's Occupy protestors (after hearing a talk show host go on and on about their 'violence') I reflected on how you NEVER hear about the POLICE violence in the corporate media. But as soon as one or two or a handful of protestors breaks a window, or defaces a building, it is front and center, repeated ad nauseum. Broken bones, skull fractures and worse injuries suffered ROUTINELY by people exercising their First Amendment right to peaceably assemble, these are not worthy of mention by our corporate media overlords and their hirelings It shows how fully f*cked up everything is that inanimate objects that are harmed are deemed more important than people who are harmed.
Memory_Hole,
i think we're on the same wavelength.
i tuned to kgo at about 11pm last night on the livestream (after my housemate told me 100's had been arrested). i intermittently listened to the dj (guest host ?) on the radio for about a half hour. i was really freaked out b/c the clown on the radio (inet livestream) was ignoring police brutality EVEN AFTER A KGO REPORTER had been kettled and detained by the oakland police. all he could say was evil demonstrators had provoked the police, occupy is out of hand, this isn't the correct way to convey a message. yaddah, yaddah, yaddah.... all garbage. i had to wonder if the radio station was receiving a direct payment from the city of oakland for spreading the propaganda. even when the machine nabs reporters, the msm media will not stand up and state the obvious. the police were using heavy handed tactics.
and the weapons the police recovered from the 'crime scene'- a pair of scissors, a hammer, a few pocket knives - and shields. and why did the protesters need shields to protect themselves ? maybe b/c the police fire directly into the crowd. even abc's own video showed this is true (the video image behind the talking heads claiming it was the demonstrators provoking the police).
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/video?id=8523666
i admit i listen to kgo to hear the idiocy of characters like bill wattenburg - it's a perverse form of entertainment (chomsky listens to limbaugh, i wish he'd video tape the expression on his face as he listens to rush - i'd love to see that). last night was just over the top, it was far from entertaining. it was exactly as you stated a fucked up reality that demonstrates, in america, objects are more important than people. welcome to america - the heart of darkness.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
dc is supposed to be dispersed by the police today, for those who can watch throughout the day- the dc livestream link is below.
http://www.ustream.tv/occupydc
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
...peace...
Totally agree. We have to lay down our lives for change, they just hire someone.
They have special jails for "White Color Crimes" you know, restricted retreats.
The Canadian prime minister is as much a servant of corporate power as the American president. And replacing either will not alter corporate domination.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The Canadian prime minister is as much a servant of corporate power as the American president. And replacing either will not alter corporate domination.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The Canadian prime minister is as much a servant of corporate power as the American president. And replacing either will not alter corporate domination.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
yep, you cannot overstate that!
I like this new phrase: "The Native Elite", quislings one & all (ie. Norway's "benedict arnold" from WWII).
the idea of working in a supranational vein is key to the nwo
they can get the psychotic politicians like harper, obummer, clinton etc to do whatever they want but it is not enough
when you, as a multinational, want to effect a change in a country that is unsavory for the population you do it like nafta, or the more resent acta - behind the backs of the comatose population and when it is unveiled from out of nowhere it is presented as a done deal between X amount of countries.
this allows the local psychopaths to say - hey its out of my hands
nothing i can do...
once they are in they say they can't be undone or else something awful is going to happen
this is why the un and the rockefellers have spent the last 70 years undermining the nation state
what fool would go along with these psychos any other way...
But the simple truth is all those agreements and treaties can be undone. Most have "opt out" clauses like NAFTA. We should wonder why they are never used, even when it's proven the agreement (experiment) has failed. I remember the NAFTA discussion it was sold to us on the premise that it could be rescinded if it was found to be a failure. Obama and Hillary both used it in their campaigns for president.
http://www.democrats.com/node/15850
"We should wonder why they are never used, even when it's proven the agreement (experiment) has failed."
If I might answer your question: They are never used because the agreement (NAFTA) has only "failed" for We the People the 99% who rely on working for our subsistence. For the 1% it's working great! Stock dividends are up, corporate profits are skyrocketing.
Exactly. Which begs the question: Why are so many in the 99% obvisiously unaware of that fact, and continue to allow the 01% to market blatant lies? But perhaps they are not unaware. Maybe it's like the dynamic that takes place in personal abusive relationships. I know many of us are overworked and/or overwhelmed, but I don't understand why we don't resist further abuse. Why we continue to fall victim to the same abusers and abuses. In this case it can't be "love".
They have you bamboozled into thinking borders are bad. That's what NAFTA did - it eliminated the border.
It's too late to opt out of NAFTA. They killed American Shipping and the Merchant Marines. Doesn't make any difference any more.
Claudia L The Merchant Marine was dieing long before NAFTA was passed. Actually NAFTA had no effect on The US Merchant Marine. I was a Radio Officer in my younger years and saw the decline of the Merchant Marine. For too Many years the US Merchant Marine was protected by trade laws that we have slowly abolished. As well other countries relaxed the "Flags of Convienance" such as Liberian, Panamanian, Cayman Islands Etc. The bottom line was avoiding taxes more than anything else. As well more relaxed regulations, but the bottom line was tax shelters. Many of the foreign flag ships are own by US European, and Asian Corporations. I could go on. NAFTA was enacted in the late 90's. In 1985 I was on a business trip to NYC and saw numerous ships tied up in Brooklyn which had been sailing just a year or two before. It was the beginning of the end of the Traditional Merchant.
Gnken! NAFTA was the death nail. Getting around the Jones Act another nail.
I went with my husband in 92 on his container ship for 1 1/2 months and saw NAFTA up close and uncomfortable. One stipulation of that agreement is that US ships in NAFTA ports had to allow the dockworkers of the host country to board and off load using US cranes. Of course they had no cranes so they practiced on ours. They broke the crane. It costs $60,000 for a new part and we were forced to stay at that dock until the part came and is it cost $5,000 a day to rent dock space. Crowley with about 15 ships sold out.
SO There were al lot of reasons but NAFTA was one of them.
It was like trade sabotage.
The title of this piece should be "Corporations Have No Use For Borders and Neither Should Protesters".
Nationalism has always been a tool of human divisiveness.
The corporate controllers still use the belief in nation states as a way to limit our awareness of global connectedness, even as they themselves have no allegiance to anything beyond money.
All nation borders are false constructs. The corporations know it and it is time we recognize that we are being limited by the belief in separate nations.
Is your allegiance to a section of land or is your allegiance to something greater?
The corporations ignore the false borders as a way of reducing everyone and everything to monetary resources. The cheaper, the better, as far as they are concerned.
If we cling to these false delineations called nations, we are allowing them to keep us reduced to scattered storage units for their devious uses.
Saying a pledge to a flag, a section of land, or a religion, as if that is your main identity, is a way that your humanity is reduced AND it is exactly what those with corporate power want you to do.
A place is not the same as a flag or a religion. Place is something those of us who have worked the land we live on have strong emotional ties with, not just a commodity. Corporate power would love for all of us to cut our ties with the land that nutured us for our lifetimes, shelters our dead, holds our memories and provides for our futures. They'd love to commoditize it for their own purposes. They've brought us the end of family farms, they've bought leases to the natural resources that reside within our public parks and scenic wonderlands. And they have no qualms when it comes to despoiling them for profit.
Would you have us all become nomadic, and voluntarily be moved around by those in power? That's their ultimate aim.
Well said. The great lesson to be learned is allegiance to one's nation (land, community, locality, cultural "tribe", etc...) does NOT HAVE TO automatically imply enemity with neighboring nations. It can mean cooperation with one another on mutually beneficial projects, like neighboring farmers cooperating with each other.
Also, some countries see freedom as chaos. They would rather have their mosques and burqas rather than elections and know Victoria's Secret. But if it's their right as a country to have their own culture there needs to be a border so people know what the rules are where they are standing.
It is simple to think that if there were no borders there would be no differences. I don't ever see the whole world ever living together as long as there are different cultures. You must wipe out the cultures first. That is what the US is best at.
"gardenernorcal"
I am specifically talking about Nationalism as identity.
I am talking about disconnectedness from others based upon pride.
The problem is that too many people see their garden as being separated from all other gardens, when, in fact, we all depend upon the one garden.
Your assessment is totally misrepresenting what I am saying. People are being displaced because of patriotic smugness which separates us from those seen as outsiders.
.
gardenernorcal (in reply to Birdbrain Alley) wrote:
A place is not the same as a flag or a religion. Place is something those of us who have worked the land we live on have strong emotional ties with, not just a commodity. Corporate power would love for all of us to cut our ties with the land that nutured us for our lifetimes, shelters our dead, holds our memories and provides for our futures. They'd love to commoditize it for their own purposes. They've brought us the end of family farms, they've bought leases to the natural resources that reside within our public parks and scenic wonderlands. And they have no qualms when it comes to despoiling them for profit.
Would you have us all become nomadic, and voluntarily be moved around by those in power? That's their ultimate aim.
- - - -
Birdbrain Alley (in reply to gardenernorcal) wrote:
I am specifically talking about Nationalism as identity.
I am talking about disconnectedness from others based upon pride.
The problem is that too many people see their garden as being separated from all other gardens, when, in fact, we all depend upon the one garden.
Your assessment is totally misrepresenting what I am saying. People are being displaced because of patriotic smugness which separates us from those seen as outsiders.
* * * * *
My Reply,
Birdbrain Alley,
I think gardenernorcal's comment is a good complement to your own in that gardenernorcal's comment calls to mind another way in which people have a sense of place and community.
gardenernorcal ends gardenernorcal's post with a question that could be interpreted as a request for a clarification and elaboration of your point of view, rather than as challenge that supposedly follows a misrepresentation of your point of view as you seem to think.
Throughout history nationalism has almost always involved nothing more than cult worship of the nation state inspired and led on behalf of those in power by those who serve power. The pledge of allegiance and the national anthem are just two of the most obvious cult rituals of the nation state and as you have said they serve to separate and divide us.
"If we cling to these false delineations called nations, we are allowing them to keep us reduced to scattered storage units for their devious uses."
well stated...
the international financial elite needs to be revealed, then shamed repeatedly, then detained, then put on public trial for crimes against humanity and finally imprisoned on a remote island that's under 24 hour surveillance.
http://www.forbes.com/wealth/billionaires
"Gallery: The Richest People On The Planet
This year's list broke records in size (1,210 billionaires) and total net worth ($4.5 trillion). China doubled its number of 10-figure fortunes, and Moscow now has more billionaires than any other city. Mexico's Carlos Slim widened his lead at No. 1."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
It’s not a conspiracy! Elite controls global economy
http://rt.com/news/global-elite-economy-conspiracy-427/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
...peace...
I don't know about you, but I don't want to live like the people in China, or Haiti or Mexico. And we can't afford to import them all to America and feed, educate, and see to their medical needs.
Hey! Borders are good. Some countries see freedom as chaos. They would rather have their mosques and burqas rather than elections and know Victoria's Secret. You want to live like that? But if it's their right as a country to have their own culture there needs to be a border so people know what the rules are where they are standing.
What happened to Canada? Simple really. What wasn't given away to "multinational" corporate interests by the NAFTA deal has been purchased outright with their exploitation profits. And, with the partial exception of Quebec, that includes almost all cultural assets that once supported some distinctions between the Canadian and American socio-political environments. Canadian kids and young people today take their societal values and other concepts almost exclusively from "entertainment" and propaganda originating in the US.
That's why the US insists that its "cultural exports" and "intellectual properties" must be included in "free trade" arrangements just like any other commodities. Quebec won some concessions for its "distinct society", but the rest of the Canadian populace is inundated with USA Incorporated psyops incessantly just like Americans themselves.
It's all very well to argue against the divisiveness of "artificial" borders. Just be sure you understand the likely "globalization" alternatives realisitically. The prevalent American "one world" vision is very much like its "freedom and democracy" vision.
"Canadian kids and young people today take their societal values and other concepts almost exclusively from "entertainment" and propaganda originating in the US."
I believe that just as many older folks also take their cues from crap originating in the US and they also gladly pay for it without reservation. Interestingly, Canadians voted in favor of Nafta with the election of conservative Brian Mulroney in the 80's under the mistaken Idea that they would be able to drive to the States and buy TV's real cheap!
Depends on which of Mulroney's free trade position statements Canadians might have believed at any given time. In his original leadership bid, he was strongly opposed to the whole idea. Here's a verbatim Mulroney quote: "Free trade is terrific until the elephant twitches, and if it ever rolls over, you're a dead man. We will have none of it."
Of course, that was before his infamous Irish Eyes Are Smiling stage performance with Ronny Raygun and his Carlyle Group sponsorship arrangements. US politicians have no exclusivity in the corruption game.
Chris Hedges in an interview with Lawrence Lessing.
They had just come back from Occupy The Courts. The discussion is general, not focused on the courts.
Chris is getting clearer on his message. Lessing for the most part comes across as the dead liberal described in Hedges' book "The Death of The Liberal Class", 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLFPN-XFGk0&list=UUvELRNEQucoFRPea8hG3ZGg&index=1&feature=plcp
I hear that Canada is getting ready to do HOV on the highway. It's understandable that the population of that country is sparse and that like Rural US, public transportation can be hard to come by. Still, unlike the US, it's legal to grow hemp for some fuel so there shouldn't be any need to dig up on the tar sands. As for Occupy, keep it going alright but it'll have to follow up with representation or else Obama/Romney/Harper will still prevail.
Wonder why MSM spends so much time on election "Coverage"?
As Hedges astutely observes, "And when one native ruler was overthrown or, more rarely, voted out of power, these imperial machines recruited a new face. The actual centers of power did not change."
For those CDers who fervently believe some tweaking of the US political process will free us all, e.g. Ron Paul or Rocky Anderson instead of obama, please recognize the hypnotically, powerful diversion. Energetically Create a rallying spirit for Individual Rights and Humanity at large.
Workers of the world, unite! You have only your chains to lose. It sounds hokey now, after more than a century of mockery from the capitalist class and its brainswashed cretins, in and out of the punditocracy. But it's true. We need to let go of nationalism. Nationalism is just another way the 1% (the owning class, those who live off investments) has of dividing and conquering us. THEY have no loyalty to nation states, despite their wrapping themselves in the flag(s).
I believe that it was Albert Einstein who said that nationalism was the most dangerous force in the world.