Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Poverty in America: The Subject Presidential Candidates Would Prefer to Ignore
This week in Johannesburg, South Africa a mother was trampled to death as thousands of young people surged, desperate to register for university, because there are no jobs and studying seems a way of waiting out the recession.
No work makes people desperate. Just the week before a young friend in Boston who graduated last year with a management degree told me he was going back to college because he could not find work, so the hopes of young people there and here are similar. Indeed this recession is making young people poorer than older folk, and as we age and the burden on economies increases from so many gray hairs, they will never experience the prosperity we, their parents, did.
An hour before I read of the South African tragedy I listened to Tavis Smiley and Cornel West on NPR discussing poverty in America; one in two are now poor, 42 percent of American children don’t get adequate nutrition, 41 percent of African American youth can’t find work. Those figures now parallel poverty measures in South Africa.
A South African friend told me of meeting a trade unionist in Washington D.C. who represented the construction industry and was bemoaning how wages had barely inched up in the last two decades; they were effectively lower than 20 years ago and worker’s rights had been eroded. He talked of how companies working with asbestos regularly flouted safety provisions. He mentioned how at the mega-Homeland Security building site in D.C. African Americans who live in the area, some of them veterans, couldn’t get jobs. “The contractors are getting cheap Latino workers from Virginia and Maryland,” he claimed. Worker rights in America, he sighed, were now “third-world.”
My South African friend was offended, “no they are not,” she said, “Most African countries would not tolerate such a lack of worker rights. In the United States workers can be summarily dismissed, often without reason, they can be made to work 12-hour days, they rarely get overtime pay, they would never get away with that in South Africa. No worker can work for longer than eight hours, and if they do, they get double pay. There is a slow process of warnings and counseling before dismissal. Maternity leave here is scant but in South Africa women get three to six months on full pay and men are entitled to paid paternity leave.”
We, who once led the world in worker rights, and whose management thinkers were considered gurus, now lag the world with many citizen rights.
And yet not a single presidential candidate from the Republicans or the Democrats is talking about poverty. None have presented plans. They say they’ll create jobs; we seem to have heard that song before. They say they’ve run companies (that closed factories and moved jobs to China) and that means they’ll be able to run the economy. Yeah, right.
President Obama has presented a Jobs Plan that when scrutinized has as much depth as a goldfish pond. The GOP candidates spent $12.5 million on television ads in Iowa alone, and Obama is raising a $1 billion war chest to fight the election. It is probably fair to say that people who can throw that sort of cash around don’t have a clue of what it is to be hungry, or to wait in a job line, or to fear foreclosure.
And what about us? Those of us with the education, skills and passion to be reading reports on BAR, what are we doing? I was shocked when someone I consider to have similar political views to mine said she wouldn’t shop in certain supermarkets, “because you’re likely to get in line behind people with food stamps, they slow the process.” She said it without a blush, or a thought of what her words meant.
Smiley and West believe the Occupy Movement will re-emerge in the Spring and present a more potent force. I agree, but Spring is some months away. Many see the Occupy Movement as the actualization of Dr. Martin Luther King’s Resurrection City, a component of the Poor Peoples Campaign. Dr. King, a staunch critic of US foreign policy, called the US “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world”. As we celebrate Dr. King’s birthday, the question that Gandhi posed remains the most essential: are we committed to implementing the change we all want to see?
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

20 Comments so far
Show Allit's the old double-edged sword conundrum: no one wants to be in desperate circumstances, but often, until you are, there's very little willingness to employ adequately desperate measures for redress.
unfortunately, there aren't enough desperate people in this country - that is, fighting in every way we know how to change things. living in or at near poverty can induce an additional layer of lethargy beyond what is already commonly felt among people in the u.s. (who succumb to "don't rock the boat" or "don't bite the hand that feeds you" ways of thinking). it's the weight of feeling isolated, powerless, useless and without hope. just turning around that situation is a major accomplishment.
While the writer's magical incantation invoked the power of King and Gandhi and cast a spell over my heart, her magic sadly did not affect my mind.
It's okay. We don't discriminate against the mentally challenged and you are welcome to continue your recovery here.
For our shining, all Amerikkkan candidates, there is no poverty in America: there is only a bad patch of time before the growth economy picks up again.
"Cornel West is a prominent and provocative democratic intellectual. He is the Class of 1943 University Professor at Princeton University. He graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard in three years and obtained his M.A. and Ph.D. in Philosophy at Princeton.
He has taught at Union Theological Seminary, Yale, Harvard and the University of Paris. He has written 19 books and edited 13 books. He is best known for his classic Race Matters, Democracy Matters, and his new memoir, Brother West: Living and Loving Out Loud.
He appears frequently on the Bill Maher Show, Colbert Report, CNN and C-Span as well as on his dear Brother, Tavis Smiley’s PBS TV Show. He can be heard weekly on Tavis Smiley’s NPI radio program. The Smiley and West radio show is a highly acclaimed progressive program. He made his film debut in the Matrix – and was the commentator (with Ken Wilbur) on the official trilogy released in 2004. He also has appeared in over 25 documentaries and films including Examined Life, Call & Response, Sidewalk and Stand. Last, he has made three spoken word albums including Never Forget, collaborating with Prince, Jill Scott, Andre 3000, Talib Kweli, KRS-One and the late Gerald Levert. His recent spoken word interludes were featured on Terence Blanchard’s Choices (which won the Grand Prix in France for the best Jazz Album of the year of 2009), The Cornel West Theory’s Second Rome and the Raheem DeVaughn’s Love & War: Masterpeace.
In short, Cornel West has a passion to communicate to a vast variety of publics in order to keep alive the legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr. – a legacy of telling the truth and bearing witness to love and justice."
http://www.cornelwest.com/
cornel west is an american treasure - period end of story
this brother is enlightened and streetwise at the same moment and he has the great gift of love for all
he is a beacon of justice and he is a defender of the working man
it is a pleasure to listen to him speak - his words are deep and wide
as his profile suggests he is also one smart dude, book smart and life smart and we should listen to what he says
check him out
other honorable americans:
let's start with the most revered intellectual in the world noam chomsky
"Noam Chomsky is a US political theorist and activist, and institute professor of linguistics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Besides his work in linguistics, Chomsky is internationally recognized as one of the most critically engaged public intellectuals alive today. Chomsky continues to be an unapologetic critic of both American foreign policy and its ambitions for geopolitical hegemony and the neoliberal turn of global capitalism, which he identifies in terms of class warfare waged from above against the needs and interests of the great majority.
Chomsky is also an incisive critic of the ideological role of the mainstream corporate mass media, which, he maintains, "manufactures consent" toward the desirability of capitalism and the political powers supportive of it.
Over the past five decades, Chomsky has offered a searing critical indictment of US foreign policy and its many military interventions across the globe, pointing out that the US's continued support for undemocratic regimes, and hostility to popular or democratic movements, is at odds with its professed claim to be spreading democracy and freedom and support for tendencies aiming toward that end. Indeed, as Chomsky argues, the current concern from Washington with so-called "Rogue States," as much as the stated goal of aiding democratic movements in other countries, is not supported by successive administrations' support (either direct or indirect) for political and military dictatorships across Latin America, the Middle East, and Asia. As Chomsky stated: "As the most powerful state, the US makes its own laws, using force and conducting economic warfare at will." It also threatens sanctions against countries that do not abide by its conveniently flexible notions of "free trade." "
http://www.chomsky.info/
norman finkelstein: Norman G. Finkelstein received his doctorate in 1988 from the Department of Politics at Princeton University.For many years he taught political theory and the Israel-Palestine conflict. He currently writes and lectures.
http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/
here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?playnext=1&index=0&feature=PlayList&v=KIalnDazjsY&list=PL182ACF2C3294D81F
you can listen to norman completely destroy the zionist liar alan dershowitz on democracy now - for a full hour
dersh is exposed for the lying sack of batguano that he is
wow!
on the other hand listen to norman debate with schlomo ben ami - head negotiator for israel at camp david - again on democracy now
it is the most literate and respectful debate you will ever hear - two intellectual giants, and they cover the real history of israel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-FLIBkTg8g
but back to dr west - he is the modern day martin luther king and he remains, as so much does, unobserved by the people who would most benefit from his incredible knowledge
as leonard cohen said of jesus: he sank beneath our wisdom like a stone...
medmedude:
"other honorable americans": the entire staff at VCNV especially Kathy Kelly; and to everyone referred to in "a patch of ground people"- a Neil Young tribute to the working men/women, when being part of the franchise meant something.
Repeat: A Patch Of Ground People - musical sounding on its own weight alone. Should be applauded along with your comments. Thanks
From the article: "Just the week before a young friend in Boston who graduated last year with a management degree told me he was going back to college because he could not find work, so the hopes of young people there and here are similar."
This, like so many other things that Americans in general do, is what baffles me. This kid borrows thousands upon thousands of dollars from the banks to get a mediocre education in the hopes of getting a mediocre job. He graduates school, saddled with debt for years to come and can't find a job. His solution? Borrow more money and go back to school so that when you come out, now saddled with debt for the rest of his life, he still can't find a job.
And this exemplifies the entire country. People are poor and can't afford stuff? Hell, cut whatever little benefits they've got, that will solve the problem! War is killing the economy? Go to war with even more countries cause that will solve the problem! Wall Street crashed the economy with their reckless and predatory behavior? Give 'em more money and more leeway to do more of the same cause that will take care of the problem. This country - both government and people - are the personification of Einstein's other theory, the one of insanity.
The fact that there are just five comments so far to this article speaks volumes about the comfortable bourgeois status of most CD commenters, and the lack of of a class-based awareness among the poor who don't even know, or care, this website exists.
One thing for sure, the only thing most of the poor where I live care about right now is the death of Joe Paterno. And to the extent that they even know the name of the anti-worker, teacher firing, public transit dismantling, fracking-friendly governor of our "Commonwealth", the only thing they are angry at him is firing Paterno after the pedophile scandal - the only correct thing he has done.
"there are just five comments"
yes - a poor showing.
i'm not sure i would call the cd community bourgeois. take any day of the week and some column or other will elicit comments from all over the political/social map. none of us are immune to various blind spots.
but you don't need to be a clairvoyant to understand that our growth in the awareness of poverty will be guarenteed as more and more of us will find ourselves "walking a mile (or more) in those shoes."
Yes! And it is the dreadful feeling of Impotency. My husband and I are using all our retirement money to keep our children afloat. We kid about using our little sail boat in a Viking burial. Then I slap myself in the face and say, "If I'm going to die, I'm taking some greedy bastard with me." While I'm choosing, I'm going to Occupy somewhere.
Poverty in America: The Subject Presidential Candidates Can Afford to Ignore
Poverty does not count politically, until the poor can vote against wealth backed candidates. All the candidates are wealth backed, there are no candidates with policies that have anything like progressive taxation, or reasonable welfare support, for what is going to be an increasing long term problem.
The global economic engine is struggling with petrol starvation. This means enormous profits for the wealthy owners of fossil fuel corporations, with rising prices, until complete breakdown of the state and society. Profiteers do not want to take on the burden of sharing. Windfall profiteers need to be taxed, to fund an energy transition. No presidential candidates are talking about it, so its off the policy agenda.
There is growing investment in renewable power generation, and it could be very much more, as is desperately required because of still growing global carbon emissions. In such an emergency, all nations, should be utilizing all spare resources to transition to carbon emission free energy, including a massive investment in renewable energy, and energy efficiency oriented jobs program.
Carbon emissions grew in China by 10% in 2010, still growing in the US by 4%. Although growth in renewable energy is high, it is not keeping up because of its small base size. When BP says that Fossil Fuels will still play a "critical role" in 2030, they mean growth prospects of renewable energy cannot possibly catch up with enormous, still growing lead of climate change causing energy production. Say hello to 6 degrees of climate change, coming soon to generation alive today. The profits of the 1% are not going to be used to save anyone.
they are not "ignoring". increase in poverty of the 99% is a primary objective of those who vet, and then buy our prezes to be...
The Fact that No Pres Candidate Has YET Talked About Poverty Shows that both Repugs -&- Obama & the Dims- either don't have a clue what to do about poverty or most likely Don't Really Give A DAMN about Poor People- nor working class people either!
Nor Do they any of them seem to have a real jobs prog in conjunction w an infrastructure up-grade & development plan [what happened to Obama's hi-speed rail & 'green' Econ hype] -nor- even how they'd stop [or at-least slow down] jobs being shipped over-seas at 1/4 - 1/40 the US' wage scale. Nor have they both the Repugs or Obama said what they'd do about the fore-closure crisis [a moratorium on fore-closures from fradulent loans is a good start- but what about prosecuting those who sold fraudulent loans in the first place].
And the fact that Repug front-runner Newt Grinch-witch openly & freely uses the racist & elitist term 'Food-Stamp Pres' when referring to Obama, shows that guys like him [& Hush Limp-balls, etc] don't really believe in the myth that they taught us in school was that- even if you're are poor &/or Black you could one day grow up to be US Pres [I think they called it the 'American Dream' / 'Horatio Alger Story', etc...]! Obama- like him or NOT- happens to embody that myth. 'Food-stamp Pres' is thinly disguised code-speak that No Black, Brown &/or poor person should ever even be considered to be worthy to be US Pres- That's why a racist / elitist hypocrite like Grinch-witch [& Limp-balls] uses it!
They get away with it because everyone wants to ignore poverty (except the poor). We have it in the UK as well, where middle class journalists are busy telling us that the coalition government's war on the poor chimes with the public's sense of what is fair. And seen from one narrow, conservative point of view, they have a point: why should people who feel under pressure see their tax money spent on helping even poorer people to stay afloat in dire circumstances. Much is made of the fact that people with housing benefit can afford to live where people without housing benefit cannot afford to live: nothing is made of the fact that wages are so low and rents so high that this result was inevitable. No - *everyone* must be poor, and the poor must be booted out and made to live in paupers' ghettoes which they can afford. Though probably so far from their jobs that they cannot afford to get to them any more. That way the rich need not look out and see poor people living near them. Not seeing the poor equates with not thinking about them, so the political debate can continue without interruption, and without demands that income be redistributed so that everyone has a high enough wage to be able to afford to live where they want to, in homes where regulation keeps the rent fair.
Yes, very unAmerican. Sorry.
Consider that we bailed out financial institutions that were "too big to fail" without accountbility or stipulations as to how those bailouts were to be used, and we could only extend unemployment benefits by extending tax cuts to the top 01% and it's no wonder no one talks about the poor.
The wealthy are in denial. They don't want to admit that perhaps the day is coming when the rest of us can't afford to prop them up. It's like a newly diagnosed diabetic having to face the fact that they have to cut down on their desserts.
And every single candidate is a member of the 01%.
"...when someone I consider to have similar political views to mine said she wouldn’t shop in certain supermarkets, “because you’re likely to get in line behind people with food stamps, they slow the process.”............................... increasing operational scarcity and unsustainability forces competition, with winners and the losers who are abandoned to poverty and death...
joseph conrad, and now leonard cohen speak of the horror....
Come March, this will all seem like a bad dream and the farcical presidential three ring circus will be deemed irrelevant by the vast majority of American citizens.
The shit is going to hit the fan big time.
First class article Marsha. Thanks for writing and sharing it.