Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Could Ecuador Be the Most Radical and Exciting Place on Earth?
A decade ago, Ecuador was a banana republic, an economic basket case. Today, it has much to teach the rest of the world
Ecuador must be one of the most exciting places on Earth right now, in terms of working towards a new development paradigm. It shows how much can be achieved with political will, even in uncertain economic times.
Just 10 years ago, Ecuador was more or less a basket case, a quintessential "banana republic" (it happens to be the world's largest exporter of bananas), characterized by political instability, inequality, a poorly-performing economy, and the ever-looming impact of the US on its domestic politics.
In 2000, in response to hyperinflation and balance of payments problems, the government dollarized the economy, replacing the sucre with the US currency as legal tender. This subdued inflation, but it did nothing to address the core economic problems, and further constrained the domestic policy space.
A major turning point came with the election of the economist Rafael Correa as president. After taking over in January 2007, his government ushered in a series of changes, based on a new constitution (the country's 20th, approved in 2008) that was itself mandated by a popular referendum. A hallmark of the changes that have occurred since then is that major policies have first been put through the referendum process. This has given the government the political ability to take on major vested interests and powerful lobbies.
The government is now the most stable in recent times and will soon become the longest serving in Ecuador's tumultuous history. The president's approval ratings are well over 70%. All this is due to the reorientation of the government's approach, made possible by a constitution remarkable for its recognition of human rights and the rights of nature, and its acceptance of plurality and cultural diversity.
Consider just some economic changes brought about in the past four years, beginning with the renegotiation of oil contracts with multinational companies. Ecuador is an oil exporter, but had benefited relatively little from this because of the high shares of oil sales that went to foreign oil companies. A new law in July 2010 dramatically changed the terms, increasing the government's share from 13% to 87% of gross oil revenues.
Seven of the 16 foreign oil companies decided to pull out, and their fields were taken over by state-run companies. But the others stayed on and, as a result, state revenues increased by $870m (£563m) in 2011.
Second, and possibly even more impressively, the government managed a dramatic increase in direct tax receipts. In fact, this has been even more important in revenue terms than oil receipts. Direct taxes (mainly corporation taxes) increased from around 35% of total taxes in 2006 to more than 40% in 2011. This was largely because of better enforcement, since the nexus between big business and the public tax administration was broken.
Third, these increased government revenues were put to good use in infrastructure investment and social spending. Ecuador now has the highest proportion of public investment to GDP (10%) in Latin America and the Caribbean. In addition, social spending has doubled since 2006. This has enabled real progress towards the constitutional goals of free education at all levels, and access to free healthcare for all citizens. Significant increases in public housing have followed the constitution's affirmation of the right of all citizens to dignified housing with proper amenities.
There are numerous other measures: expanding direct public employment; increasing minimum wages and legally enforcing social security provision for all workers; diversifying the economy to reduce dependence on oil exports, and diversifying trading partners to reduce dependence on the US; enlarging public banking operations to reach more small and medium entrepreneurs; auditing external debt to reduce debt service payments; and abandoning unfair bilateral investment agreements. Other efforts include reform of the justice system.
One exciting recent initiative is the Yasuní-ITT biosphere reserve, perhaps the world's first attempt to avoid greenhouse emissions by leaving oil underground. This not only protects the extraordinary biodiversity of the area but also the habitats of its indigenous peoples. The scheme proposes to use ecotourism to make human activity compatible with nature.
All this may sound too good to be true, and certainly the process of transformation has only just begun. There are bound to be conflicts with those whose profits and power are threatened, as well as other hurdles along the way. But for those who believe that we are not condemned to the gloomy status quo, and that societies can do things differently, what is happening in Ecuador provides inspiration and even guidance. The rest of the world has much to learn from this ongoing radical experiment.




51 Comments so far
Show AllSome words:
radical=root. Ecuador continues to nurture the legitimate root of life free from the intensified 500 year old colonization - now neo-colonization OF predatory extraction by the fractional reserve banking model.
The alternative to Rio+20 in June provides alternative visions and terminologies that are worth savoring and considering.
http://rio20.net/en/propuestas/the-american-peoples-new-economic-charter
Global Alliance for the Rights of Nature - SIGN A PETITION
http://therightsofnature.org/
This is the first piece of good I have heard in while, please do not spoil it. If that country survives in its current state and keeps progressing it will indeed be cause for elation.
Whenever I get depressed about what's going on here in the U.S., I look south. No society's perfect, but it seems like a lot of South American countries are doing a lot of things right:
Not only are the governments generally progressive and a few left-wing, like Venezuela, but women are gaining influence, with Argentina, Brazil and Chile choosing women to lead the country. As a Green Party member, I was delighted to see the Green former mayor of Bogota have a shot at becoming president of Columbia, and another Green, Marina Silva, coming in a respectable 3rd in the race for president in Brazil.
I spent 10 days in Quito, Ecuador recently and left with a positive impression. Not only did they have curbside recycling, but also curbside compost pickup. They had dedicated bus lanes and loading platforms -- still only a dream here in supposedly left-coast San Francisco. On the other hand, you take your life in your hands when you step off the curb.
If you want to read another generally upbeat article, you might try the one on Brazil in a recent New Yorker (unfortunately not free). Find a summary here:http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/12/05/111205fa_fact_lemann
The U.S. distraction with Afghanistan and the middle east has been good for South and Central America.
So, overall, the core of Ecuador's success is being what the US-right calls a "tree hugging tax-and-spend liberal".
Would appear to be.
How tight is their border security? Do they shoot at southbound illegals aliens?
Bundecutchie -- Ecuador has become a very hot retirement location for Amerikans and Yuropeans. Cuenca is often the city of choice.
http://www.retire-in-ecuador.com/index.html
http://www.escapefromamerica.com/2011/03/overseas-retirement-in-costa-rica-or-ecuador/
Funny, but, as a warning, don't try coming in directly from the north. That border is Columbia's, and Correa recently sent an additional 10 thousand troops there.
And work on your Spanish; it's not a country where you'll have much need or use of English.
what's important for amerikans to realize is that this nightmare of corporations and endless war in which we live is not the way of the world
it is our way and we are in most parts of the world but that is another thing
we live in spiritual darkness - despite the plethora of life hating christians all around - thanks to bankster terrorists like b of a and goldman sachs and greedy corporations runs by psychopaths
in south amerika they have leaders like correa and chavez who actually improve life for all of its citizens
that's why we hate them so much and that is why the pentagon is planning to attack them all
kill those fuckers!
like chomsky says - amerika is more ruthless than the mafia and they will not tolerate freedom anywhere in this world
this hatred of life in amerika is now focused inward with pipa, sopa, gmo's vaccines and the war on terror
all led by the nwo puppet barak romney or mitt obummer
the gop primary has been hilarious - can't vote for the mormon - can't vote for the totally evil gingrich and santorum well forget him totally
ron paul is so excluded that if someone shot him in the head during one of the endless debates fox and cnn wouldn't cover it
a lot of governments are trying to free their people and a lot of governments are
choking the life out of their citizens
hmmmmmmmmm
Is your "shift" key broken or do you think Capital Letters are elitist?
You forgot to mention the greatest revolutionary leader of the last century, and the man the US most loves to hate: Fidel Castro. He did more to improve the quality of life in his little isolated nation than any leader in modern times. And, for his troubles, he's survived more CIA assassination attempts than anyone on earth.
Luckily there are some in the world (and even some elites) who recognize that what is good for all is actually good for all. Yeah, I know, who would a thunk it? Also, it truly helps to have the right person come along at the right time to focus frustration in a meaningful way. It's likely lucky that Ecuador did not have to overcome a quite sophisticated right-wing echo machine such as in the US. I would point out too that leaving some $100/barrel oil in the ground is smart economics. In not too many years they can sell it for $ 500/barrel or even much higher.
"It's likely lucky that Ecuador did not have to overcome a quite sophisticated right-wing echo machine such as in the US."
-- Nope, they had to overcome a right-wing echo machine too... Overcoming this had more to do with the fact that Ecuadorians are so much more politically aware than USAns. I guess that is the one good result of living in a society that has been dealing with colonialism for 500 plus years - at some point you just get fed up and learn how to organize and resist domination.
I have zero expertise on this, but I did use the qualifier "sophisticated" and assumed that the Ecuadoran right-wing did not have the same access to corporate bought ad men with multi-million dollar budgets and readily available English language psychological studies, etc., and funneled to its population with quite the degree of both non-stop subtlety and overbearing fear-mongering of being an out of step fool, loser, or worse.
I was down there about 4 years ago and it's true about political awareness. There was always one group or another in the presidential plaza advocating one progressive cause or another. It convinced me that one of the most important factors keeping US citizens from engaging in civic activity is an absence of physical public squares in which populist political messaging is not only tolerated but expected.
Then along came Occupy!
Maybe not this time around, but Reagan killed the last Ecuadoran president, Jaime Roldós, in 1981 for trying very similar reforms as Rafael Correa is making today. He also assassinated the president of Panama for trying to retain the canal zone. John Perkins dedicated his book, Confessions of an Economic Hitman, to those two presidents, both of whom were his clients, and the only two he couldn't bribe.
I was in Ecuador in 2007, and it was an amazing place to be at that time...To witness Correa say "NO" to imperialists. Yet despite the positive changes, the Ecuadorian Amazon is in danger of being despoiled by oil interests. The Achuar people are willing to risk their lives to protect the rainforest... Here is a short (60 second) video on the subject, made by The Pachamama Alliance:
http://vimeo.com/33753861
Five million acres of Ecuadorian rainforest are currenlty being negotiated for oil exploration. Thank you esabi for opening my eyes and ruining my day.
"A hallmark of the changes that have occurred since then is that major policies have first been put through the referendum process. This has given the government the political ability to take on major vested interests and powerful lobbies."
Enough said.
Direct democracy
Exactly. I was in Ecuador in late December and early January. I head read the constitution, was up on what was happening in Ecuador, thought I had it all nailed down. While I was there (Global Exchange reality tour), we got lots of history and saw more. We met with key people in social movements,and, I have to admit, I was puzzled by their calm conviction. But their particular referendum process was so foreign to me that it didn't sink in until two days before I was to return home. When I finally understood how that process both limits and empowers a president and fully empowers the people, I couldn't believe what I had missed.
When someone inside a social movement says that if Correa does such and such or doesn't do such and such, there will be "political consequences," they really mean it. Amazing!
From this article, you can link to another that explains the nature of the process. It's worth a read. It's hard to believe what is happening if you take Ecuador's history into account (I can appreciate cynicism about any good news from Ecuador); this sort of transformation takes a rare blend of courage and intelligence.
The downside is that I feel more powerless than ever back at home. Ecuador is indeed an exciting place to be right now; I'm suffering from reverse homesickness.
Sadly, " the government's approach, made possible by a constitution remarkable for its recognition of human rights and the rights of nature, and its acceptance of plurality and cultural diversity" will only " halt plans to mine the oilfield if it could raise 50% of the $7.6bn revenue being lost by not mining the oil" from "An alliance of European local authorities, national governments, US film stars, Japanese shops, soft drink companies and Russian foundations" who "raised $116m (£75m)," which is only "enough to temporarily halt the exploitation of the 722 square miles of "core" Amazonian rainforest known as Yasuní national park" http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/dec/30/ecuador-paid-rainforest-oil-alliance?intcmp=239
Geez, what is wrong with this picture?
I went to Ecuador in 2009 and volunteered at a conservation reserve and an organic farm. It was a wonderful experience learning about Ecuadorian history from the Ecuadorian's themselves, rather than from the slanted lens of some US authored book.
The one aspect of this article that is missing is how this whole change happened - massive populist pressure from below. While in Ecuador, I learned about the CONAIE (The Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities). The indigenous of Ecuador consist of about 12 nationality groups and are 2 million plus strong now that they organized themselves into one movement. Even with their differences of culture they were able to resist the urge to stay divided. I have since continued to learn more about them from a research project I wrote in my anthropology class. If you have the time... read more about their movement, and how they organized to affect real change in Ecuador. Check out how they single-handedly stopped the Agrarian Reform Law of 1994 through mass protests, occupations and sit-ins. This group is so unbelievably inspiring because they represent mainly the rural and poorest of the country. And by organizing they gave these people a voice in the national discourse. They are a force that can no longer be ignored. The whole reason pluri-nationalism and the rights of nature are in the new Ecuadorian Constitution is a direct result of their voice finally being heard.
Read about them here:
http://www.conaie.org/ (if you are bi-lingual google will translate it for you)
http://conaie.nativeweb.org/
Jayati Ghosh wrote... "There are bound to be conflicts with those whose profits and power are threatened, as well as other hurdles along the way."
- Yes, there is a guy named Alvaro Noboa who still has an immense amount of wealth and power in this country. Noboa is a billionaire banana magnate, and still owns the majority of the banana plantations in Ecuador. In fact, the reason USAns get a cheap year-round banana supply is directly related to him (he owns the shipping company that ships them up here... and which then takes US exports of grains, corn and rice back to them) He still has an immense amount of pull in this country. When Noboa ran for the 2006 presidency against Correa he literally was handing out $20 bills to the poorer communities to try and win over votes.
The other major issue that Ecuador faces is how to develop in a world where the extractive economy is the only way to fund modernization projects. Even with all of the good changes in Ecuador the development model is the same - extract natural resources and sell them in the world market. Because of this the "rights of nature" is being ignored by the Correa gov't.
Read this interview of Alberto Acosta (former Minister of Energy and Mines, and the ex-President of the Constitutional Assembly) to get an idea of why this is a huge problem.
http://upsidedownworld.org/main/ecuador-archives-49/2586-ecuadors-economy-under-rafael-correa-twenty-first-century-socialism-or-the-new-extractivism--an-inteview-with-alberto-acosta
CommonDreams is fair at self-policing the articles that come over its transom. Many mainstream media outlets aren't good at all, and the mostly made-up news outlets are way below that.
However, Common Dreams occasionally grabs a rip-and-read lunker. That's why we need second and third opinions about new topics. Ecuador is pretty new to me. Thanks Eric.
Eric, what do you use as a media source to keep up with what is going on in Ecuador now that you're back in the states? I haven't found anything reliable yet. Scratch the reliable ----- I find almost nothing, reliable or otherwise. My Spanish isn't good enough to rely on South American sources.
upsidedownworld --- already on my desktop --- but what else?
I'd especially appreciate a translation of Correa's weekly speeches.
I am friends on facebook with the reserve I volunteered for. They do updates here and there about current events, but mainly stick to news about them. I couldn't find many English sources for news updates on Ecuador (besides upsidedownworld) The first CONAIE website I linked to has pretty recent updates of what is going on (from their perspective) and google has a translation option you can use.
If you ever decide to learn the Spanish language... I found this link for online newspapers that are in Ecuador.
http://www.onlinenewspapers.com/ecuador.htm
I'm studying Spanish in college... while I am not completely fluent (yet) in Spanish, I do know enough to be able to understand the gist of what the article is about. It takes me a lot longer to read, but it is also helping me quite a bit to become a better Spanish speaker.
thanks for all the links and info, Eric A. Blair. And keep going, you're on the right track!
Kudos to you for your learning and doing. Onward.
The last para of the Alberto Acosta (an economist!) interview pretty much covered the bases:
"What we need to do in the medium- to long-term is overcome this model of accumulation. We need another way to organize the economy, which is not so dependent on the exploitation of natural resources. We need to move from an extractive economic model, to one based in the knowledge, and forces, and needs of human beings, individual and collective. We also need another way of inserting ourselves into the world market that is more intelligent than simply providing raw materials. We need to start producing other kinds of products for the international market. But more than anything, fundamentally, we need to strengthen the internal market and to strengthen regional integration in Latin America. Ecuador needs to break with the extreme concentration of assets and income, and change the pattern. We need to achieve equality if there is to be justice and freedom. This is what we need. And this requires a lot of democracy. Always more democracy, and never less."
I'm not holding my breath, but I'm sure willing to go in that direction.
Correa has also had to face a historically fractious political scene especially on the left where indigenous groups have been instrumental in bringing down government after government in the last decade. Like Morales, he's had to navigate the very difficult maze between socio-economic development and resource conservation in an impoverished economy with a malfunctioning state. The fact that they've had any success in such a short time period despite the inevitable contradictions, is a huge step forward.
Hope Ecuador doesn't end up going the route of Chile under Salvadore Allende with the CIA going in to destabilize the place, foment a fake revolution, and put someone like Pinochet in there to undo everything. Given that the U.S. Secret Government has a long history of doing exactly that sort of thing, it is definitely something to keep an eye on.
I worry about this. Castro saw assassination attempts because he got the big foreign cash extraction operations out of Cuba. Chile got a bloodbath for its temerity. Ecuador has done no less. Panama (twice), Haiti, the Dominican Republic, most of Central America,
We know all this, it's part of our culture. Don't forget the Woody Allen country in "Bananas" (the UJA will protect them. "Don't you mean the CIA?" "Uh, oh.")...
The island of Grenada hired a British company to build a jetway so more tourists could land, and was then invaded for plotting to attack the USA. A jetway on a tiny island is a potential threat to our country's air superiority, even if the island doesn't actually own any military jets.
As long as the government remains a direct democracy, the country will be ruled by popular consensus, not leaders that can be decapitated.
Oh and they also got rid of the country's sole US military base in 2009.
Oh, yeah. Ecuador is the most happening place on Earth. That would be the reason why my best's friend's significant other, born and raised in Ecuador, visits and can't wait to get the hell out of there due to the poverty, the power outages, the scarcity. He goes there on a regular basis to visit his immediate family and to help them because they live in abject poverty. But even that is great, of course!
But the grass is always greener on the other side. If you're in Ecuador, the US is the greatest place on Earth. If you're in the US, Ecuador happens to be the greatest place on Earth (second to Cuba, of course). The real moral of the story here is how creative our minds are and how we fabricate bubbles of fantasy in order to cope with the ugly realty that surrounds us, be it in Ecuador or the US. And the worse things get, the more we fantasize and the greener the other side becomes.
Hurrah for the flag of the free!
May it wave as our standard forever,
The gem of the land and the sea,
The banner of the right.
Let despots remember the day
When our fathers with mighty endeavor
Proclaimed as they marched to the fray
That by their might and by their right
It waves forever.
Let eagle shriek from lofty peak
The never-ending watchword of our land;
Let summer breeze waft through the trees
The echo of the chorus grand.
Sing out for liberty and light,
Sing out for freedom and the right.
Sing out for Union and its might,
O patriotic sons.
Hurrah for the flag of the free.
May it wave as our standard forever
The gem of the land and the sea,
The banner of the right.
Let despots remember the day
When our fathers with mighty endeavor
Proclaimed as they marched to the fray,
That by their might and by their right
It waves forever. -Sousa's lyrics
The author never said poverty had been eliminated in Ecuador. It will take decades to fix the damage done by colonialism. What the article did say is they are on the right track of achieving popular self-determination. The US is surging in the exact opposite direction.
Agreed. The best of luck to the Ecuadorian people. They have an inherent right to charter their own destiny without foreign interference. Nothing would make me happy than to see them succeed but oppression, brutality and corruption are so imbedded in our (Latin American) cultures - through no fault of our own - that it takes a super human effort to break from that vicious cycle. So far, there is no country in LA that has truly been able to do that and overcome the past. I know that they they accomplished some great things with the Water Wars and that is commendable and encouraging.
Al perro flaco, todos son pulgas
Por favor explica tu comentario, Eric.
It's a Spanish expression that translates as, "To the skinny dog, all are fleas."
It's meant for the person who thinks everything sucks. So take this article that shows some great aspects of how Ecuador's political scene has drastically improved... But to the skinny dog, Ecuador sucks.
By the end of the U S A's Obama regime this too shall pass.
>>esabi wrote: "Yet despite the positive changes, the Ecuadorian Amazon is in danger of being despoiled by oil interests. The Achuar people are willing to risk their lives to protect the rainforest... "<<
It's hard to get such a worrying development (and a few others like it) heard in the middle of a gushing, euphoric chatter. The euphoria is primarily over what looks to be moves towards social justice, due to a few significant victories where the people made it clear that they value environmental preservation over short term profits, but most likely due to a misplaced optimism over Rafael Correa's left credentials.
But what all this gushing, such as that by this author, misses or downplays, is the continuing threat to whatever is left of the rainforests in Ecuador and the continuing fears of the indigenous people in Ecuador about preserving whatever little is left of the place they call home.
From "Whither Ecuador? An Interview with Indigenous Activist and Politician Monica Chuji":
http://upsidedownworld.org/main/ecuador-archives-49/1563-whither-ecuador-an-interview-with-indigenous-activist-and-politician-monica-chuji
>>Another clear example is ITT. The Taegheri and Taromenane peoples [in voluntary isolation] live in the Ishpingo-Tambococha-Tiputini area. This is the Huaorani people's territory. Ecuador's indigenous people, in accord with international agreements and the 1998 constitution, asked for this area to be protected. The President, who is very intelligent, said, "Great. Let's leave the oil underground and see how many countries will supplement the $500 million a year we would lose." He knew that this would be very difficult to accomplish.
Q: Will the new constitution help protect these areas?
The same sort of doublespeak continued into the Assembly. We have an article that states 'Exploitation in protected areas is prohibited. But, in exceptional circumstances, the President of the Republic, with the permission of Congress, can exploit.' He knows that he'll have a political majority and will be allowed to exploit the ITT or whatever protected area. We opposed this, but couldn't muster the votes. The majority of people in Alianza País are people who obey, who have electoral ambitions. They follow what the president and the [party] executive committee say.
Q: What do you think are the most worrying things about Correa?
The people mobilized in Dayuma and were repressed. There was a mobilization in Cuenca against mining projects and the president got on the radio and said, 'If twenty of these crazy ecologists are protesting, I'll call 20,000, or 200,000, residents to confront them.' What is this? What sort of regime is this? This is socialism of the 21st century?<<
From "Danger Ahead: Correa Gives Mining the Green Light in Ecuador":
http://upsidedownworld.org/main/ecuador-archives-49/1575-danger-ahead-correa-gives-mining-the-green-light-in-ecuador
>>"Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa, a left-of-centre economist, has been celebrating a major victory since the new Ecuadorian constitution passed with 64% approval on Sept. 28. It expands access to social services for Ecuadorians and grants them the right to water, as well as highly lauded rights for nature.
There is a "danger," however, to the realization of his political project says Correa, and it is neither the old oligarchy nor transnational corporations that continue to have a strong influence.
Speaking during a recent national radio address he said that the real threat lies among the "infantile" and "fundamentalist" environmental, indigenous and leftist groups who are staunchly opposed to metal mining.
"It's absurd to be seated on hundreds of billions of dollars and for romantic notions, novelty, fixations or whatever, to say no to mining. Yes to mining, but to environmentally, socially and economically responsible mining," said Correa."<<
From"Amazon Oil Expansion in Ecuador's Southern Rainforests"
http://amazonwatch.org/work/challenging-emerging-threats-in-ecuador
In August 2010, while the Ecuadorian government made strides in advancing the historic Yasuni-ITT proposal to keep three major oil reserves permanently underground beneath Yasuni National Park, news began to leak that President Correa harbors no plans of keeping the rest of the country's oil in the ground. According to reports, the administration plans to offer 11 oil blocks up for bid come April 2011, all of which are in Ecuador's southeastern Amazon.
These lands are the ancestral territories of the Kichwa, Achuar, and Shuar, who have fought off previous efforts to sell off their homelands and pledged renewed resistance to any oil projects in their territory.
From "Ecuador Charges Indigenous Activists with Terrorism"
http://amazonwatch.org/news/2011/0919-ecuador-charges-indigenous-activists-with-terrorism
Defending sacred sites and the environment can land you in jail for being a terrorist, according to indigenous activists in Ecuador.
"There are about 200 cases against indigenous activists, campesinos, mextizos and other leaders," Pepe Acacho, Vice President of CONAIE, the Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities in Ecuador, told Deutsche Welle.
Acacho, who is also a Shuar leader, faces 16 years in prison for blockading the street during a demonstration against a proposed water law in 2009. The law would have ended collective management of water in indigenous communities, a centuries-old practice. Acacho said that he was arrested with 40 other protesters and charged with terrorism.
(Continued below)
From "Ecuador President Rafael Correa Loses Indigenous Allies"
>>After an initial honeymoon period, Mr Correa and indigenous groups have clashed over several issues. Indigenous organisations have marched against the government's policies on mining, because they want the right to veto new projects on their ancestral land.
In March, the Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of Ecuador (Conaie) filed a lawsuit against President Correa and his government for alleged genocide of two native populations in the Amazon region - an accusation Mr Correa dismissed as "ridiculous".
Ecuador was hosting a summit on minority rights in Latin America. Delegates were invited from across the region, including Mr Correa's left-wing allies, Hugo Chavez of Venezuela and Evo Morales of Bolivia.
But Ecuador's main indigenous organisations were not invited to take part in the summit in Otavalo - an important indigenous town.
"Repressive Attitude"
Angry at its exclusion, Conaie organised an alternative summit.
Hundreds of indigenous people, many of them from the Amazon lowlands, marched on the main convention centre holding traditional spears and even a snake.
After a clash with the police, some 30 leaders were charged with sabotage and terrorism.
Indigenous leader Monica Chuji, who took part in the march and who once acted as Mr Correa's secretary of communications, says using anti-terror legislation against protesters was an over-reaction.
"The president has intensified his repressive attitude towards the indigenous movement," she said.
From "Ecuador's Yasuni-ITT Proposal":
http://amazonwatch.org/news/2011/0819-ecuadors-yasuni-itt-proposal-precedent-and-practicality
>>Time is ticking for Yasuni in Ecuador, one of the most bio-diverse forests on the planet. Ecuador's historic proposal to keep its largest crude oil reserve beneath the iconic Yasuni National Park permanently in the ground in exchange for half of its forgone revenues ...
Correa has set December 2011 as the final deadline to meet the financial goal before enacting a "Plan B" to begin drilling, and major funds are lacking.<<
From "Wayward Allies: President Rafael Correa and the Ecuadorian Left":
http://upsidedownworld.org/main/ecuador-archives-49/1396-wayward-allies-president-rafael-correa-and-theecuadorian-left
>>Outside of Ecuador, most progressives consider President Rafael Correa to be a Leftist champion of social and economic justice. Inside the country, however, conflicts between Correa and the social movement Left—the indigenous movement, environmentalists and unions, among others—have become increasingly heated. On June 23, Constituent Assembly President and long-time social movement ally Alberto Acosta resigned his post after high-profile disagreements with Correa over issues of procedural democracy and indigenous, economic and environmental justice. Acosta headed the legislative body charged with writing a new constitution.
... The media often contrast Correa internationally with right-wing leaders like Colombian President Alvaro Uribe and nationally with characters like Jaimie Nebot, mayor of the Ecuadorian coastal metropolis of Guayaquil. In Ecuador and abroad, this leads to an inaccurate, black and white, Right versus Left framework.
... Correa, long known for lashing out against opponents on the Right, has increasingly made verbal attacks against social movement activists and Leftist politicians. On June 7, Correa made some particularly harsh comments on his weekly radio program, stating that enemies of oil and mining are not part of the Alianza País led process of "revolution."
"I hope that the Leftist radicals who do not believe in the oil companies, the mining companies, the market or the transnationals go away," said Correa.
... To the degree that it exists, popular perception in the U.S. and Europe has been colored by Correa's stance against U.S. hegemony in the region, along with his forceful rejection of Colombia's March 1 attack on a FARC camp on Ecuadorian soil. The mainstream media has simplistically lumped him in with the Spanish-speaking "axis of evil" stretching from Bolivia and Venezuela to Cuba. The Left media has, on the other hand, under the assumption that the enemy of my enemy is my friend, championed him as a man of the people. Greg Palast, a well-known progressive journalist, wrote an article in terms so emphatically glowing that it is clear he spoke to no one except the President and his spokespeople when he parachuted into the country. A five-minute conversation with any social movement leader would have significantly complicated his analysis.<<
From "Delusions scale - Correa in the labyrinths of megaminería" by Alberto Acosta, translated from "Rebelión":
http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=142708
>>"We have lost too much time for development, we have only one second to lose, (...) that make us lose time are also those demagogues, no mining, no oil, we spent discussing nonsense. ... " President Rafael Correa, Macas, 10.12.2011
"In Ecuador, from what I remember, there has been no one who has promoted with as much enthusiasm and vehemence large-scale mining or megaminería, as does President Rafael Correa. Even the dictator Guillermo Rodriguez Lara, the ineffable Bombita general, whose administration, (for) nearly 40 years, (after) it began exporting oil (from) Amazon (was not) as stubborn a champion of extraction, as is Correa."<<
So, back to this question by Jayati Ghosh: "Could Ecuador Be the Most Radical and Exciting Place on Earth?"
Answer: Yes, it could be. But it's not time to celebrate yet, unless you are willing to overlook the persisting threat to the remaining rainforest (in a country that has had the highest rate of deforestation in South America, although mostly due to actions and policies of criminal rulers and oligarchs) and if you are willing to overlook the lack of any sincere attempt at justice and respect for the indigenous people. And that should not be too hard for some ideologues. So go ahead, celebrate, by all means!
Thanks for this necessary corrective to the original post, Alcyon. Correa, as your post reveals. is increasingly opposed by the very indigenous movements that were responsible in part for his rise. As an economist, he tends to fall on the side of resource extraction, and as the leader of the state, he is determined to preserve its interests over those of minorities.
Obviously, the struggle continues...
Yes, Hymenaea courbaril. Despite a new constitution, a rare achievement these days, there seems to be a tendency on the part of the state, to weaken democracy, already! Yes, the struggle continues. So outsiders should be careful in heaping praise, which will suit the government just fine, while the reality on the ground may be different. And that would be unfair to those still waging the struggle to be heard.
From "Ecuador’s Economy Under Rafael Correa: Twenty-First Century Socialism or the New-Extractivism? – An Inteview with Alberto Acosta":
http://upsidedownworld.org/main/ecuador-archives-49/2586-ecuadors-economy-under-rafael-correa-twenty-first-century-socialism-or-the-new-extractivism--an-inteview-with-alberto-acosta
>>"Ecuador has been a country based in the production of bananas, flowers, shrimp, and oil, and there are people who now believe that it can be a country based in mining production.
In reality, we’ve been living off the rent of nature. In the last few decades, since the 1970s, Ecuador has had as its principal source of revenue the exploitation of oil – the extraction of crude oil and the export of oil into the international market. This is a fundamental characteristic of the Ecuadorean economy. And this has not changed substantively under the government of Correa.
It’s true that he’s sought greater participation of the state in generating the oil rent. There’s been a certain increase of state control over oil activities. There’s been an attempt to increase the efficiency and to strengthen the state oil company. And the state’s greater take of the oil rent has allowed for improvements in education, health, and social welfare.
But at the root of things, the fact that Ecuador has an economy dependent on natural resources has not been altered, and we remain highly dependent on our insertion into the world market.
What we need to do in the medium- to long-term is overcome this model of accumulation. We need another way to organize the economy, which is not so dependent on the exploitation of natural resources. We need to move from an extractive economic model, to one based in the knowledge, and forces, and needs of human beings, individual and collective. We also need another way of inserting ourselves into the world market that is more intelligent than simply providing raw materials. ... Ecuador needs to break with the extreme concentration of assets and income, and change the pattern. We need to achieve equality if there is to be justice and freedom. This is what we need. And this requires a lot of democracy. Always more democracy, and never less. "<<
Alberto Acosta, btw, is ex-Minister of Energy and Mines, and ex-President of the Constituent Assembly. And there is already concern about the criminalization of protest, and we're talking of the protest by the left, environmentalists and indigenous people! That's what is missing from this article's coverage.
It is NEVER easy to take on the oligarchs, well entrenched over the centuries, fight the transnational corporations AND stand up to the empire, all at the same time! But the question is, has the government gone after the oligarchs with the same kind of resolve with which it went after the protesters, some of whom are facing serious charges, including of terrorism?! Has the government been true to the spirit of the constitution, even in its early years?
Well informed corrective to the hagiography of Correa. I wonder about your background and experience. You use good sources and seem to have lived in the country. I have read that in the collapse of the rotten partidocracia, Correa represents a sort of "hyperpresidencialismo" that trumped his alliance with the forces that helped bring him to power. Ecuador has such a hard time lurching forward. It has had so many revolutions that were shadow plays. Remember the "payasado" of Abdula Bucaram? There is a fictionalized account in a novel The Mother Earth Inn (writen by me). By the way, do you know if the petrochemical plant (built in alliance with Chavez) in el Aramo is moving forward?
Hi halrivers, I'm sorry, I didn't mean to give the impression that I was "knowledgeable" about Ecuador. :) My point in making these posts was just to throw in a bit of caution and to remind people that it's still early to hold this up as a "success story". That is especially so if one considers the indigenous people's POV and the persisting threat to the remaining rainforest area.
In the past, I was mostly following the Chevron law suit and learning more about Chevron's despicable record in the country. Then there were all these hopeful news (from a left perspective) out of the country, and I think we all look for a bit of good news. But then I heard these other accounts from groups fighting to save the remaining rainforests - not just in Ecuador, but everywhere, but Ecuador was mentioned as one of the 'hotspots' where the rainforests were still under threat. I also noticed that despite all the positive news, there was no news or even no talk (I could be wrong) about land redistribution. I had read about resettlement of landless people in the forest area in the 1970s and so I was curious to know about the large landholders under the new constitution.
I also wondered if the new government was taking the easy way out on the economic front, by relying on oil revenues, while leaving the oligarchs untouched. I wish I had firsthand knowledge, but we all try to make sense of the situation with the means we have. This is also my impression about Venezuela -- that there has not been any real move towards sustainability. But I know it's not easy, what with centuries' old inequalities and entrenched interests, and so things can move only so fast, especially while the empire is trying to undermine any little progress. As long as things don't regress, from an ecological point of view, I guess it should be taken as good news. After all, there are other, far bigger criminal countries from an environmental and climate point of view.
I have heard about the petrochemical plant. If Ecuador's existing refining capacity is not enough, I guess it might make sense to build more. I don't know the numbers involved, but if the capacity is far more than what Ecuador needs at present, and aimed at exports, these things will take on a life of their own and expanded drilling will be inevitable.
Speaking of sustainability, ecological footprint and quality of life (my main interest, really!), a few years ago (maybe 2007), Cuba was cited as the only country meeting the sustainability criteria, by the Global Footprint Network and also by WWF, by having a low enough ecological footprint per capita and a high enough human development index (HDI). Cuba was probably forced into this situation starting in the 1990s, but still, it was a working model, even if I don't know what the people there feel about their "ranking". It seemed like Ecuador could be next to move into this category, but then it became clear (to me) that it won't happen unless the talk matches the actions on the ground, and without reducing the inequalities within.
From the 3-line description I could find on Amazon, your novel seems somewhat prescient?
thanks for the ,many good links, alcyon. It will take some time to peruse them, but they've been saved to a file and hopefully I'll get through some or most of them, if not all.
It's so thrilling to read about positive developments around the world. Many have come recently out of Latin America. Latin Americans surely deserve some successes. They have lived under the oppression first of Spanish imperialism, then Merkan imperialism. They have kept alive their socialist souls through it. Great for them. This article provides us sort of a lesson in human nature. Only from the perspective such articles provide can we see through Merkan imperial propaganda. We see first that we can have an ongoing media narrative based on questions like this: "Ok, who's standing up next, after Bolivia, Venezuela, and now Ecuador?" I want to know, don't you? Another question - "Ok, isn't it obvious that India and China being so large, like the USA, are moving toward the same kind of econo-imperialist funk that plagues the USA? Doesn't this suggest that too big to fail is actually too big to trust?" Naturally, our far-left prescription of LOCALISM addresses this "too large" dysfunction, ehh? We need LOTS more information like this article conveys. This is exactly why Merkan elites suppress it. The future belongs to those who find a way to beat the elites back into their cages. Watch Latin America.
My impressions from living in Ecuador for the last six months and seeing first hand the depredations of the oil and mining industries here it is my opinion that alcyon's comments are accurate. Correa is a clever politician who is determined to spend just enough of the money earned from these ecologically devastating extractive industries on social programs to continue receiving support from his base, primarily composed of the urban poor and much of the educated liberal class. Meanwhile, despite his silvery environmental rhetoric, it is the open door for oil and mining industries (largely Canadian and Chinese) in the Amazon, guaranteeing wholesale, virtually irreversible environmental destruction and further evisceration of indigenous rights and culture. At least Correa is not turning his back on the poor (except for the indigenous community, an old story here) and is part of the welcome trend seeing South American distance itself from el monstruo del norte. But in the end Ecuador is making the same Faustian bargain the developed world has embraced with such catastrophic results. They will enjoy the riches torn and bled from the earth for a short while but in the end bemoan the true treasures they have lost. Ecuador a developing utopia? Ask the Amazon. Ask an indigenous person. You'll get a different perspective.
moses, could you comment on whether there has been any serious attempt to reduce the inequality in land holding? It seems to me that it had a direct bearing on past resettlement policies and deforestation, AND encroaching on the rights and land of the indigenous people. I know it is NEVER easy to redistribute land held by the oligarchs, but has there been a talk, or a demand along these lines?
I had posted this on a different article recently:
From "What are underlying causes of deforestation?" - World Rainforest Movement
http://www.wrm.org.uy/deforestation/indirect.html
>>Land tenure policies and inequalities
Ecuador offers an example which applies not only to most other Amazonian countries but also to many other Southern countries with deep forests. Since the 1970s there has been a great influx of farmers into the Ecuadorian Amazon, one of the most precious forest areas in the world. Most of these farmers came from the Andes and coastal regions of the country, where they were faced with landlessness, unemployment, and land degradation. Migration was strongly encouraged by the Ecuadorian Government, with a provision for land titles for plots of 45-50 hectares for the migrants. As farmers ran the risk of losing their land title if they did not turn it into agricultural or other "useful" land, deforestation was more or less obligatory.
In most cases, only a combination of a desperate situation at home and strong legal, economic or other incentives will make people migrate to the forest. In Ecuador, the migration was mainly government-driven, caused by the lack of land reform and sustainable agriculture in the Andes and coastal regions (push-factors) and a deliberate policy to entice people to move to the forest (pull-factors), through a public information campaign using false perspectives and land titles which often encroached upon the land rights of indigenous peoples. While the construction of roads by oil companies helped the farmers, it is also important to note that in countries which do not have such push- and pull-factors, the construction of roads through the forest does not automatically lead to migration. In Cameroon, for example, most farmers do not feel tempted at all to move from their semi-arid homelands in the North of the country to the tropical forest in the South, despite the fact that this forest is being increasingly opened up by logging roads.<<
This is how I see the effect of inequality on the environment: those who hold on to too much land and control the resources make it inevitable for the rest to go out and cut more forests, dig up more resources, etc., simply to survive. In fact, I would say that this was one of the major factors that even forced so many people to leave Europe to go and colonize the "New World" because the aristocrats were holding on to a hugely disproportionate share of land.
Ecuador must keep a weather eye to el norte. The US will try and destabilize
the government the same way they did in Venezuela and Bolivia over the last few years. They need to partner with the other progressive countries in South America and develop a joint state security service whose single charter is to liquidate US intelligence assets before they can get any traction to institute a coup. Honduras, Haiti, Panama are all victims of CIA Coups. Gadaffi didn't react fast enough either. Luckily Assad is reacting and has Russian help. Ecuador must prepare and keep breaking up US efforts before they can do much damage. Exposing them publicly
will keep Washington on the defensive. The United States cannot be allowed to wreck yet another flourishing democracy.