Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
More Intellectual Dishonesty at the New York Times
In an article in Sunday’s New York Times co-signed by Isabel Kershner and Ethan Bronner, the readers of the “Paper of Record” were informed that, “…Israelis are turning inward and discovering that an issue they had neglected -- the place of the ultra-Orthodox Jews -- has erupted into a crisis”.
So, the Israelis have suddenly become aware of the social problems provoked by the rise of state-coddled authoritarian fundamentalists in their midst?
Funny, my friends and contacts from Israel have been talking obsessively about the problem for over 15 years, with many of them predicting quite openly during all of this period that, if left unchecked, the rise of the haredim will eventually lead to the destruction of any remaining semblance of democracy within their society.
But if Kershner--an Israeli citizen--and Bronner--whose son has served in an Israeli Army which has been in daily contact with the gratuitously violent behaviors of the fundamentalist settlers on the West Bank--are to believed, this sense of alarm surrounding the issue of the religious right is a brand new phenomenon.
Their pose of being “shocked, just shocked” about the rise anti-democratic fundamentalists in the society they have inhabited for years, is nothing short of mendacious.
If the two reporters had a modicum of intellectual honesty they would have said something like this.
“For years, we, the reporters who inform the American people about the goings-on in Israel and occupied Palestine, a group that—as Allison Weir and Jonathan Cook have shown—is overwhelmingly comprised of Jews with deep emotional, and quite often familial, attachments to Israeli society, have systematically downplayed the scale and impact of religious fundamentalism within the Zionist state.
Since its founding, and with ever-increasing intensity since the rise of the Likud Party under Begin in the late 1970s, the discourse of Israeli identity has been predicated on the idea that Israel is a bastion of Modernity, Rationality and Democracy surrounded by a sea of essentially medieval people, savage beings beholden to the dark superstitions and violent dictates of the Koran.
After having consumed an Israeli media diet rooted in this master trope for decades, and after having watched many of our friends and family members go off to war on the basis of this premise, we have become deeply imbued with this way of looking at the world.
Moreover, as people who are acutely aware of how crucially important the implantation of this Manichaean narrative of a plucky and democratic Israel besieged by religiously-fueled fanatics has been to securing massive US military and diplomatic support for the country to which we are deeply attached, we have a strong disincentive for reporting on the existence of similar tendencies in Israel.
Insofar as the Americans find out that important elements of Israeli society are just as, if not more, chauvinistic, authoritarian, and anti-modern as our own, endlessly repeated, caricatured version of “the Arabs”, we are bound to lose support from the States.
As our mothers used to say, some things are best left unsaid outside the confines of the family.
In other words, when we said in the article that “the Israelis” had neglected the issue of the place of the ultra-orthodox in their society we were, in fact, really referring to what we ourselves had done in our roles as reporters before the US reading public.”
Indeed, even when Bronner and Kershner finally do get down to telling us about the “sudden” sense of crisis about the roles of religious zealots in Israeli society, they do so in a way that is largely sympathetic.
No one-size-fits-all negative portrayals of the religious haredim here. That treatment is strictly reserved for religious people who derive large parts of their worldview from the Koran.
No, unlike the world’s millions of Islamists who are regularly presented, per se and en masse, by the same guild of Israeli-based reporters as urgent threats to civilized society, the fundamentalists within the Jewish homeland are portrayed here as a diverse and generally reasonable group whose image has, unfortunately, been marred by the existence of “a few bad apples” among them.
Bottom line: though “our” pre-moderns may have some rough edges and bad habits, they, of course, really have nothing to do with the nihilist fanatics on the other side.
One of the most important, if least discussed, factors in the advent of industrial-scale blood-letting during the 20th and 21st centuries has been the development of discourses of historical knowledge (the flagship elements of these institutionalized practices being Soviet Studies, Holocaust Studies and now Security/Terrorist Studies) that effectively place the problem of "massively destructive evil" in places that are remote from the knowledge consumer in both geographical and historical time.
Why are these practices so dangerous?
Because they effectively encourage the citizenry to suspend their critical faculties regarding urgent moral and civic threats in the heart of their own societies, thus making them much more willing to sign on to crusades designed to extirpate the pure malignancy that allegedly exists in other places.
While academics and think-tank types are the ones that generally develop these “scientific” tropes of the depraved “other”, it is ultimately the reporters at powerful media outlets that, with their daily reporting rooted in the same simplistic premises, cement these “realities” (and their implied solutions) into the minds of the general populace.
In this sense, Kershner and Bronner have been “doing their part” for years.
I wonder how many of their readers have any clue regarding just how much--to put it in academic terms--their “positionality” vis-à-vis the subject of their inquiry” affects their particular rendering of events?


43 Comments so far
Show AllSaying the NYT is intellectually dishonest is like saying serial killers are sick -- kinda pointless.
Exactly. What a news flash that is. Film at 11.
I can recall taking part in more than one discussion about whether the NYT corresponded more closely to Pravda or to Izvestiya. I usually came down on the side of Pravda (the party's/Capitalism's sock puppet), with WaPo being the analog of Izvestiya (the regime's ditto).
Well, intellectual dishonesty comes in many forms, and it's important to understand the nuances, I think. And unfortunately the Times still has a devoted coterie of readers with nearly blind faith in its greatness and Truth.
The thing all fundamentalists have in common is intolerance of other. They are so uniformly adhered to an over-riding religious thesis, that they see all others as infidels, or dangerous outsiders. Fear is purposely stoked by and through these systems of exclusion, and it fuels enmity. Let's be honest, it is largely the fundamentalists (in each region) who constitute the real plague to honest, freedom-loving people. They use their insistent views on righteousness to bully others, while granting themselves ownership of the moral high ground.
Any make-war state can count on this sect to bang the drums for aggression. Fundamentalists all believe in a patriarchal, punishing god, and this gives rise to the reciprocal belief in vengeance. It's clear that fundamentalist Jews (Orthodox), Christians, and Muslims are the forces that make war inevitable.
Of course what also figures into the martial calculus are battles over resources, along with how societies negotiate the wishes of their most affluent members against the viable needs of workers. Still, without due respect for how religious fundamentalist teachings operate, no political (or economic) analysis will prove sufficient to explain the redundant HIS-tory of wars.
Robert: Get a job! Your need to tag ridiculous comments on every thread reminds me of a big dog that has to pee on every hydrant to leave his mark.
But I`m a fundamentalist atheist amused by your intolerance.
Telling the truth about fundamentalism is not the same thing as intolerance.
To someone as dishonest as you, who shows up here on C.D. to suddenly dominate EVERY thread with comments that are basically worthless, now uses the screen name "Robert Callaghan" after how many prior ones? Does Martian bachelor or Shawn Berry ring a bell? Naturally to such a con honesty is hardly a valid issue. And what pray tell, apart from the role of informer, would bring you to these threads during working hours?
P.S You're just a word jockey who's never won a race.
Except for your vapid attacks, I really like and respect your opinion. I am only Robert Callaghan and I rather like your accusations because of their ridiculous nature. I don`t mind if you disagree with me, I even like your hilariously imaginative put-downs, and just for that reason alone, you are tempting me to poke the bear with the stick. But seriously, it is striking how your lofty and well thought out ideas are undermined by your vituperative attacks. I kinda pity you.
Excellent additional input on your part, Siouxrose, and excellent insight by Thomas Harrington (which is not 'old news', despite Robert's predictable panning).
Best,
Alan
The NYT has been dishonest for a long time, Alan. A _long_ time.
The NYT is a polished up propaganda rag. Empire lies are still...empire lies!
Yet there still are many who don't believe or are unaware of that. Unfortunately the drums do stil have to be beaten. And it's important to understand the forms the dishonesty come in. Also, on some issues the Times has not been dishonest - for example they have done an invaluable service with their coverage of the hydrofracking issue in the teeth of Gov. Cuomo's intransigence.
Yes, NYT is a propaganda source, and this article by Thomas Harrington further shows how this is done by the Times and Times reporters continually.
Where's the problem with Harrington continuing to focus on the old gray lady being a corrupted media site for the Empire?
Best,
Alan
Sioux, while your reasoning is on point Robert .like many of us, need to call a spade.
being judicious is fine but exasperation boils over when confronted with decades of
zionist propaganda.
nyt - the toilet paper of record
as for israel - i am getting pretty bored with that postage stamp of a country
just because they own the media - don't take my word for it, here is joel stein, jewish, writing in the la times
"I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. Only 22% of Americans now believe "the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews," down from nearly 50% in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League, which released the poll results last month, sees in these numbers a victory against stereotyping. Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood."
he goes on: "But I don't care if Americans think we're running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them."
"When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah."
ed note:
mikvah: a ritual bath to which Orthodox Jews are traditionally required to go on certain occasions, as before the sabbath and after each menstrual period, to cleanse and purify themselves.
minyan: (Non-Christian Religions / Judaism) the number of persons required by Jewish law to be present for a religious service, namely, at least ten males over thirteen years of age
[literally: number]
here's the article: http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,4676183.column
as for the congress: ""The Israelis control the policy in the congress and the senate."
-- Senator Fullbright, Chair of Senate Foreign Relations Committee: 10/07/1973 on CBS' "Face the Nation".
as for the banks - need i even post a link
maybe that accounts for our psychotic hatred of the arabs and our "special relationship" with zion
ps. don't tell anyone or you'll get in trouble...
MED: While Jews ARE influential in Hollywood, is all this "blame the Jews" crap really necessary, given other unfortunate parallels (NDAA, for one, growing global $/Depression, for another) with Nazi Germany circa l933?
Where is your outrage for the Christian domination of the U.S MIC?
Where is it for the Koch Brothers, or the corporations that OWN the media.
This growing UGLY trend found mostly in Ron Paul supporters (not really a surprise, given his prior affiliation with the John Birch Society) to put all the blame for the state of the U.S. on Jews and/or Israel is both sickening and scary.
There's an interesting Biblical adage about removing the board from your own eyes before you go after all those you allege to be blameworthy.
The U.S. has a HISTORY of aggression that goes back way before Israel was a glimmer in the minds of the post WW II restitution teams.
It IS fair to speak about Israeli aggression and Israeil apartheid, and the dangers of its Orthodox/fundamentalist leaders. However, unless you paint a fair assessment of other contributing, politically & economically powerful interests, your posts are narrowed by a very old and distorted prejudice.
Siouxrose:
You seem to going after medmedude since you also took issue with another post of his on CD today. Aren't you being a bit euphemistic in saying Jews "are [merely] influential" in Hollywood? Shit, they practically own Hollywood and the porn industry too. As for the parallel with Nazi Germany which you brought up--do some research and you'll find Jews just before Germany was Nazified had hugely disproportionate ownership in banking and media industries.
And PLEASE don't label me anti-Semite, because I am not in the least. But when a small minority has that much influence in important sectors of the economy, that is something worth noting. Your example of Christian control of the MIC does not make any sense as an argument to medmedude because "Christians" make up a huge part of our population so it would not be surprising if they have substantial influence/control of the MIC.
Allow me to ask you a simple question: If 25 or 50 percent of Obama's cabinet and top advisers were black (or half-black like Obomber) and somebody pointed that out, would you accuse that person of being racist? I'm sure you're aware that Jews make up only about 2 percent of our population and African Americans about 12 percent.
LINGUM: I figure if the FBI, CIA, and Homeland Security privilege themselves to lists that theoretically detail what citizens believe in, I might as well keep a few of my own. And you're on one. So it's no surprise to me, that you grant the NOD to every post that grants Israel and/or Jews a disproportionate share of the blame for the state of the world, and the USA, today.
IF you could read, you'd note that I acknowledged the Hollywood element. After centuries of personal tragedy, some Jews got pretty good at comedy; but meanwhile, you shy away from the fact that TV itself is owned by corporations like GE that make their profits FROM war. And there is a decided CAMPAIGN in place to Christianize the Military down to having Chaplains coach young Air Force cadets on the moral righteousness of dropping bombs (or other deadly drone weaponry) on citizens. The military has been infiltrated by these phony Christians who do unto Christ's name, what the average over-fed dog does to a tree.
When you give as FAIR an analysis to the many factors that shape the make-war state, instead of demonstrating a child's level of understanding in the form of a good versus evil narrative (as taken from a comic strip), then your opinions will count for something.
ALAN: Thank you for the kind words.
And GI Joe boy, "Robert C," no one takes you seriously. If you spent less time attempting to turn the site into your ego's echo chamber, and more on listening and learning before commenting, you would be treated with more respect. I notice you're often the first one to post... which leads me to believe it's your JOB to be situated here. All day.
sioux - you're bitterness is really clouding up your comments - in this one post above you are viciously attacking three people
you respond to a lot of my posts - maybe you find them interesting or maybe you find them lacking
but you always pull crap in from the weirdest places as if i said them when i did not
stick to the subject at hand at least
your ad hominem attacks should be at least, let us say, reflective of my comments to be fair
btw. you don't work for a rockefeller ngo do you?
let me say this about the jews: deep deep culture, deep intellect, deep music and wonderful sense of humor, as you noted
i live in a very jewish neighborhood and i have a jewish landlord and i am very happy to do so
it is safe, clean with lots of great restaurants
you could say i am one happy mofo in fact
my landlord michael is very anti-zion and anti-war machine just like me
as for the christian pricks like the koch bros - i agree with what you said about them
i am talking though about your hateful comments
no getting around that
Oh, Please. You can let loose a contagion of "blame the Jews,"and other anti-semitic commentary, but my calling it to the mat makes me guilty of ad hominems? No! And the persons I challenged were part of your little pack, each of you a devout Ron Paul apologist. He has no problem with racism, sexism, or anti-semitism, either... for all his claims to being against war. Sure, if everyone is on HIS team... you "one size fits all" closet racists talk a good game about peace and/or freedom, but you only recognize it when others abide by YOUR rules. And woe, to those who stand outside your ranks. Nope. I am not going to let you get away with these lies. Telling the TRUTH is hardly the same thing as being hateful. You are trying to do to me, precisely what is being done to whistle blowers... conflate the content of what they expose with alleged guilt for letting the crap out of the bag.
Tell it to the marines, pal.
Unlike you libertarian authoritarians, my mind is independent. That means if I agree with one of your posts, I will say so. It does not mean that because I think you've got it right in one area, that I necessarily will SALUTE you in all others. That type of loyalty may work for you boys in blue, but we women (thank the Goddess), have never given our vows to the deity that subsumes our conscience into the body of its own fierce martial machinery. And do not DARE tell me what subject to stick to. The days of you boys lording power over women are over... even if in your nostalgia for that glorious abuse of power has you seeing in Ron Paul, another reason to raise him to stardom.
Sorry Sioux, but in this particular thread it's you who is coming across as an over-zealous, over-reacting and vicious femi-Nazi. The comments you attacked - yes, attacked, not simply critiqued - were far more reasonable than yours.
P.S. I am stridently opposed to Ron Paul's ideology, was raised in a Zionist Jewish family (though always opposed Israeli policies and US support for same), have been protesting and resisting US imperialism for 43 years (burnt my draft card and don't pay war taxes), and was an active supporter of the better parts of the feminist movement though a vocal critic of its ideological fundamentalists (which is precisely how you are sounding here).
I strongly disagree with you. What Rose wrote sounds fine and certainly not as though written by a "vicious femi-Nazi" --- which is a dog-whistle term that should have been beneath you.
" And do not DARE tell me what subject to stick to. The days of you boys lording power over women are over..."
Read her comments again. This is the kind of arrogant, self-righteous and over-bearing comment that has undermined the wonderfully egalitarian origins of the feminist movement.
"arrogant, self-righteous, and over-bearing", huh? What do you reckon she should have done? Wrote more passively? More quietly? Apologised for her opinions? Apologised for writing anything at all? Asked for permission and instruction? Just kept quiet? Something else?
This article is about the dangers of fundamentalism and the pretense that it doesn't exist. A fundamentalist, whether religious or secular, is one who filters the world through a single ideological lens and tends to react with single-minded vehemence against any challenge.
Any ideology has its fundamentalist acolytes, including feminism, and all fundamentalisms share the same qualities and dangers. SiouxRose was exhibiting classic fundamentalist behavior, in contradiction to her claims of intellectual independence.
We must be as vigilant in guarding against fundamentalism in ourselves and in our ideological colleagues as we are in others.
I still completely disagree with you; your assertions are not probative.
"attempting to turn the site into your ego's echo chamber" now there's the pot calling the kettle black!
Untrue. Rose writes infrequently, and makes no pretense of demanding that her opinions be given special weight.
Excellent post, medmedude! Keep on writing!!!
Thank you, Thomas H. for spelling out clearly what needs to be said (and understood!). Siouxrose, your comments are always the most intelligent and apropos! It is people like you who pull me out of depression and negativity! Thank you. Unfortunately, the status quo is what it is.
Thank you for the generous compliment, Cosmaustrian. I know I spend more time than I should here, largely correcting those who advance false narratives in these threads. The truth is, there are so few venues where GENUINE Progressives are given a voice. And it's even worse for the educated mystic! As a person who formerly hosted a television show (on cable, in the Florida Keys) for nearly 8 years, and who's been published in more than 20 venues, it's been maddening to watch opportunities narrow as media became Captured by those Interests interested in retaining the very damning and damaging status quo now in place. I find myself drawn to this site in an attempt to plant ideas virtually cordoned off from mainstream media. So it's always refreshing to hear someone resonate, or say, "I hear you!"
"I hear you," too--particularly on Christian Fundamentalism in the Marines and the rest of the MIC.
My cousin recently, finally, got out of the Marines. (He joined, he told my grandfather five years ago, because he wanted to "feel alive," even though he was a sophomore at UC San Diego--shows how much our universities, particularly here the more elite ones, have become lifeless shells for so many. He was also pretty hooked on all-night video games, which he was embarrassed and ashamed about and which certainly would have taken its toll on his sense of feeling alive--hence, he felt he needed the shock and severe discipline of the military to shape himself up into "having a life.")
His number one message to me both before he got out and now has been that anyone in the Marines who is known as not Christian--or even not fundamentalist Christian--suffers very severe discrimination at every turn, is treated as a pariah, and risks personal danger. YES, the US Military is already rapidly becoming a thoroughly Fundamentalist Christian institution, if it isn't already. WHY isn't this fully exposed?
So who are the biggest fundamentalist terrorists around? We must look in the mirror.
One more thing: Rape and sexual abuse within the US military (99.9% by men on women soldiers) is astronomical and is estimated to occur 500 TIMES the rate it is actually even reported--much less dealt with. So the part about the Fundamentalist Patriarchal nature of our military couldn't be clearer. It is a machine for othering every being except the white male US Fundamentalist Christian--but even there the othering process proceeds, burrowing straight to the host's heart until only a human shell remains. The only antidote is massive doses of love, compassion, mutual joy, and appreciation for the wonder of all life and all existence.
Well, thank god for liberal Jews, and thank god for liberal Christians and Muslims. It does not matter who runs the world, or why they are so bad, what matters is wrong and right. It does not matter if Jews and Freemasons run the world, what matters is rich vs. poor. The picadillos of the ruling class is irrelevant.
Yes, Robert, what really matters is 'Empire-thinking' vs. 'democracy-thinking' in people of every nationality, race, religion, vocation, etc. etc.
While there is undoubtedly often some correlation between wealth and 'Empire-thinking', not all with money are 'Empire-thinking' sociopaths.
Best,
Alan
Actually, and unfortunately, it does matter. As an anti-Zionist Jew, I'm deeply concerned that American Jewery exerts an extraordinarily disproportionate influence on US foreign policy and the media which acts as its propaganda arm. Organs like the NYT merely mirror and propagate the powerful bias for a tiny piece of real estate in the Middle East which has become the hub of US policy in the region.
" ...have systematically downplayed the scale and impact of religious fundamentalism within the Zionist state."
As we stick our heads in the sand to the religious fundamentalism within the US state. It's as bad, mean and ugly here as anywhere else in the world.
"Oh, but they're just really REALLY devoted. They do mean well."
A similar article could be written if ever we have mainstream media exposing and expressing shock to the rise of US white-fundmentalist-neoFascism. In Israel as in the US people have noticed but the general public ignores the increasing gap between the national myth and the reality. Whether Kershner and Bronner are expressing real or rhetorical shock and dismay, it's a start we need to make about the US as well.
Getting back to the article (sorry kids, you're all getting a bit boring...) it's a pleasure to read a piece written by someone with such a fine command of the english language.
"English" is capitalized.
I typed it that way on purpose to make a subtle political point.
Instead of worrying about Islamists in foreign lands forcing women into arranged marriages, you only need to go to Borough Park and Williamsburg to see Orthodox and Hassidic women forced into arranged marriages. Liberal Jewish New Yorkers don't have to go all the way to Israel to protest injustice towards Jewish women.
Isn't there some small, deserted island floating around in an ocean where we can
send ALL of the Religious fundamentalists - Jews, Christians, Muslims, Hindus, Jains, or whatever, along with ALL the political nut jobs - like the neo-cons and fascists, etc.??? Good riddance....
And, maybe we could pick an island that would be among the first to be inundated when the ice caps melt and the seas rise!
Once Rapture comes, we'll be rid of at least some. But we could revitalize GW Bush's project to colonize Mars - which would be the mythically-appropriate planet for all such belligerents.
All the comments above just continue to prove to me a preponderance of CD readers who respond to the articles often wield the sharpest and most stimulating verbal razors I know on the Internet.........Thank you,SR