EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
- Victory in Seattle as Teachers Win Battle in Standardized Test Boycott
Popular content
Today's Top News
Seize the Chance to End the Craziness in North Korea
NEW YORK - You’ve got to hand it to the North Koreans, they certainly know how to throw a funeral.
I stayed up until two am watching the mammoth funeral of the “Dear Leader,” Kim Jong-il, live on TV from North Korea’s eerie, snowy capitol, Pyongyang. Giant floats and goose-stepping soldiers made this old Cold Warrior nostalgic for the 1970’s
Kim Jong-un, the youngest and previously least-known son of Kim Jong-il, was declared to be the next leader of North Korea following the death of his father on Dec. 17, 2011.What next for the Hermit Kingdom? Kim 3 – Kim Jong-un - has successfully made the transition. The 1.1-million armed forces, the Party, and security organs remain the power behind his leadership.
So far, a power struggle between these groups that could have led to the collapse of the North Korean state has not happened, avoiding South Korea’s greatest fear, “unexpected reunification” - a human tsunami of millions of starving northerners flooding south.
North Korea is branded a dangerous rogue state that threatens the entire world. This is certainly the common view in the United States.
However, the advent to power of “Supreme Leader” Kim Jong-un presents North Korea’s uneasy neighbors and the United States with an opportunity to defuse many of the peninsula’s dangerous tensions and even begin a process of opening the isolated Stalinist state to the outside world.
North Korea’s eccentric, occasionally violent behavior is driven by paranoia, fear of invasion, and hunger caused by crop failures. The north follows the credo of “Juche,” or total self-reliance and independence. Pyongyang routinely brands prosperous South Korea an American vassal state, and its leaders “traitors.”
North Korea is in a state of war with South Korea and the United States six decades after the Korean War. Having just revisited the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) separating them, I felt the crackling tensions there that could erupt any time into full-scale war.
North Korea’s heavy guns dug into the DMZ have half of Seoul in their range. Kim Jong-il and father Kim Il -sung threatened to turn Seoul “into a sea of fire.”
The US has hinted it will consider using tactical nuclear weapons against North Korea in the event of war. Nearly 30,000 US troops garrison South Korea; 70,000 more could swiftly intervene there along with powerful US naval and air units.
North Korea keeps asking the US to sign a non-aggression pact in which Washington pledges not to attack the North. The North’s modest nuclear program is mainly to deter a US attack by threatening a counter-strike on South Korea, Japan and Okinawa.
Washington has long refused such a pact. Instead, it has ringed North Korea with military forces and imposing a punishing trade embargo that has played a major role in keeping the North in dire poverty. The US says North Korea’s regime is brutal, illegitimate despotism with which it will only deal with the greatest reluctance and disgust.
Yet the US supports many nasty dictatorships around the globe, such as Uzbekistan and Ethiopia. If the US really wants to end North Korea’s nuclear program, the solution is to sign a non-aggression pact and end US trade sanctions.
Both the US and South Korea should end their provocative military war games on North Korea’s borders. Such posturing led to last year’s military clashes.
North Korea will have to end its nuclear program, agree to cease threats against neighbors that are a form of financial blackmail, reduce the size of its huge armed forces, move them away from the DMZ, and divert resources to feeding its people.
The hard right in the US will try to block such steps to peace. America’s neocons worry that North Korea will supply nuclear and other weapons to Israel’s enemies and wants it crushed. South Korea’s Christian Evangelical hard right won’t end its hostility to Communism.
Even so, Kim Jong-un has a major opportunity to begin defusing 60-years of severe tensions and to also begin building up a modern nation with help from China. He will have to battle entrenched military and party lobbies, and also assure Beijing that North Korea will not fall into the US sphere of influence.
South Korea toiled its way out of dire poverty four decades ago, creating an economic miracle. Equally industrious, determined North Koreans could do the same today, if given half a chance.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


45 Comments so far
Show AllAlright, so what is their behavior driven by?
Stalin never started a war against any foreign country. He waged war on his own people, killing millions of them.
Ho Chi Minh never attacked any foreign country. He fought to liberate his country from colonial domination, and then to unite it. It was the paranoid Americans who saw Viet Nam as a "domino", which, if it "fell", would cause all of South East Asia to fall. Because of this illusion, the US attacked Viet Nam, killing millions of its people. The US was defeated, and forced to get out. Now the US has excellent relations with the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam. Hillary Clinton just had a lovely meeting with the Prime Minister there, Nguyen Tan Dung, a few months ago. I was in Viet Nam at the time, and I saw her on TV, chatting with him under a large bust of Ho Chi Minh.
Milosevic was a ruthless Serbian nationalist. Why call him "paranoid"?
Saddam Hussein was a ruthless dictator who attacked Iran, not out of "paranoia", but in order to gain territory. He was supported in this war by the US, because the US was paranoid about what the new regime in Iran might do. Iran has never attacked another country.
Qaddafi was a ruthless dictator who may have been a bit paranoid about the US because the US bombed his dwelling and killed some of his relatives. In the end, his probelm appears to have been, not paranoid worry about conspirators behind the curtains, but a misplaced faith in the support of the Libyan people. And a misplaced hope that making nice with the US would save him from further bombing raids.
Pinochet was not paranoid, but an agent of US policy, itself based on the paranoid fantasy that Salvador Allende was going to make Chile Communist. Pinochet, like Stalin, never attacked another country, but saved his cruelty for his fellow citizens.
Frankly, there's a lot more paranoia loose in the US than there is in many other places, and it often leads to violence.
"Stalin never started a war against any foreign country." I rather suspect the Finns would disagree with you on that one. Let's see: after Finland, we have the Baltic States, taken over in their entirety by the Red Army rolling in: Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia. The Kaliningrad Oblask? After shelling the resisters, it was taken - by force. Poland? Forgot about that one. Then there is the whole saga of the "creation" of the USSR: "invasion" in my book. I suspect the Ukrainians, the Georgians, the Chechens, the Azerbaijanians, and hey, let us not forget the people of Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Slovaks, the Slovenes, the Sudetens, ... - Oops, starting to be a long list. All taken at gunpoint. Tanks in the streets sure looks like "invasion" to me.
From what I see, North Korea is run by a small ruling class made up of military and family members that have no interest in making peace. They live extravagant lives due to what is basically a crime racket that is run at the expense of the common North Korean.
Im sure duplicating this situation in the US is the wet dream of the Koch Brothers and their ilk. A militarist state, with a poor peasant base, and a small group of elite, mega rich families that inherit their power from the previous generation, are the sugar plums that dance in THEIR heads, when they crawl under their rocks at night.
It will be interesting to see if the USAns will put up with it. I used to think no way, but it seems to have worked quite well in North Korea for generations now. Even with people dying by the millions from starvation, the rulers stay in power.
So who knows, what will happen here when TPTB figure they have things in place for the final crack down here, but whatever does happen, I think we are going to find out what, real soon.
Shhhhh...did you fall for all that imperialist propaganda about North Korea being bad? Dude, read the other comments, they'll enlighten you quite a bit. North Korea is the cat's meow...well, at least after Cuba, Venezuela, Qadaffi's Libya, present-day Iran and Syria. And they all will tell you that from personal experience too since they're all born and bred in North Korea.
It's always interesting to read good old American paranoia.
Too many Americans adopt the same personality cult that they mock in other countries. They pick a "crazy" leader and turn him into a kind of malevolent god, just as the leader's flunkies turn him into a benevolent one. These Americans are determined not to give up their Bad Gods, or Boogeymen. They need them to make themselves feel superior, and therefore entitled to rule. These feelings are as illusory as the ridiculous praise showered on Kim Jong-Un.
It's even more interesting to see Americans (particularly those on the Left), go bat for said dictators because their ideology is based on "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." Seeing them condone, justify and ignore what they do is truly appalling. Having said that, the majority of these "crazy" leaders make it awfully easy for the US to turn them into "malevolent gods."
PS: The paranoia you read is YOURS! Mine was sarcasm but y'all are too close minded to even realize when someone is mocking you.
You may not have to wait long to find out. Over a half of the US population is either "low-income or poor", according to the Census Bureau.
Yet, apart from small groups of protesters quickly dispersed by the police, there doesn't seem to be a big wave of revolt.
I propose a massive bombing campaign of North Korea.
But instead of explosives I propose we bomb them with food, clothes, and other products that would improve the living of the people. Of course these would need to be properly packaged and have parachutes to insure they were in good condition as they fill up the country side.
Maybe even set up cell phone towers and broadcasting stations on the borders to beam into the nation so we could also gift them with cell phones, computers, televisions and radios. We should not use this to do propaganda. We should only give them entertainment that would not threaten the regime.
Another good thing to drop into the nation would be battery powered lights and heaters.
I suspect if we did this, spending the amount of money we would have to spend to go to war, that in a few years North Korea, while still staying a dictatorship, would cease being a rogue state and a threat.
We also might want to secretly negotiate with the leadership that they would be more prosperous if they follow China's model and open up to the world.
But we'll never do anything like this.
Ha ha! I remember my Dad always saying that the Yankees had the wrong approach to Cuba. He used to say that, if instead of all the shenanigans and hostilities they were trying (which have only entrenched the government and given them a Boogie Man), the Gringos flew planes over Cuba really low with hams hanging for ropes, the entire population of Cuba would walk over water running after the hams and they would win the "cold war" without shooting one bullet.
Of course, I await for all of the corrections from the experts telling me that I'm full of of shit and lie, about the embargo, Batista and the Maffia and... ~sigh~
Now that over half the American population (according to the Census Bureau) is either "low-income or poor", maybe your ham-hanging idea should be tried in America.
Cuba is poor because the US government has an embargo on trade with Cuba. Instead of ham-handed ideas like this one, maybe you should write your Congressman and ask him to get the embargo lifted.
The Pope will soon visit Cuba. Like his predecessor, he will urge the US to lift the embargo. Why not join him?
"Cuba is poor because the US government has an embargo on trade with Cuba."
Yeah, sure. That explains why the Castro regime has littered the island with multi-million dollar luxury resorts fully stacked with all the creature comforts and delights fit for a king just waiting for the gates of heavens to be open in the US. These luxury resorts, btw, are off limits to the Cubans, you know the ones that are suffering under the embargo and all jazz. The embargo, the Cuban Al Qaeda. Same Bogey Man, different spelling. But, of course, since you have never lived in Cuba, there's no way for you to know that.
As for writing to "my" Congressman and demanding the end of the embargo, two words: muuuaaaaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaaa. Thanks for the laugh, I needed that today.
And, FYI, the Pope HAS visited Cuba. Time an again. This one, the other one and the ones before those. But apparently, the gods have decided to forget about Cuba, after all, it's in such apt hands, they're not needed there. But thanks for the idea to "join" the Pope. I'm sure that little old me "joining" the Pope to demand the end of the embargo will make all the difference. And the people of Cuba will live in prosperity, wealth, happiness and peace forever after. Of course, not that I'm saying they don't now and if they do, it's all because of the embargo, of course!
BTW, sorry I shared that personal story with you. It was a waste of my time. For a foggy moment there, I almost thought that I had found someone here with mental clarity. I apologize for that faux pas. Don't mind me and, please, carry on cheering Fidel. You may even want to move there while you're at it.
"North Korea will have to end its nuclear program." Really? Says who? Mr. Margolis, a member of the superior species "homo americanus"? Because, of course, only amerikkans are wise enough to continue to develop nuclear weapons, to drop them on some inferior yellow and brown subspecies and to threaten other nations with mass murder and mayhem if they don't comply with homo americanus' barking orders. The horror that has befallen North Korean people has been masterminded by the same life forms that would not hesitate to impose the same horror on American people. As far as I am concerned, I am terrified that Kim Jong-un can keep his fat finger on a nuclear button--but I am equally terrified if another such button is being touched by the likes of Bush or Obama. Margolis is full of ethnocentric shit.
Eric Margolis must be CIA, Mossad, paid for by the MIC, working for NATO and the Pentagon, etc. etc. etc. spreading this imperialist propaganda about such a democracy. Thank Ford we here at CD are pretty smart and know better and can see thru all the paid for MIC propaganda and know (because some guy wrote a book about it that only we read) that North Korea is a beacon of justice, democracy and human rights upon the other nations. Anything to the contrary is nothing but NATO propaganda to instate an invasion of a free and sovereign nation. If that weren't enough, we just saw the people of North Korea weeping and sobbing for their beloved leader in front of the state cameras. Usually, we disregard anything the corporate media has to tell us but not this one. Oh, no, Sirie Bob, not this one. We believe this one...well, because it's true. Sheesh, Margolis. We're not stupid here, you know?
yet again your ameri-centric racism shows
Has it ever occurred to you that foreign people are fully capable of being evil on their own , of their own will and can and do do evil without any help from others.
Your insistence that America is behind everything sounds like paranoia.
Is that what I am, an "Ameri-Centric racist"? How very kind and tolerant of you to notice. But, at last, there is a label for me, now, you can feel free to treat me accordingly. And, btw, you can rest assured that y'all have done nothing whatsoever to make me see you for the fucked up bunch that you are. Out of all of my non-accomplishments, this has got to be by far the best.
And paranoid too, on top of being an "Ameri-Centric racist" -- lucky me! BTW, care to guess who I learned that paranoia from? I'll give you a hint: go thru all the posts on these articles, you'll find the answer right there and see how I've learned everything I know from the best: YOU! Paranoid is a state of mind with you whackjobs, right, left and in between. And the fact that you are the #1 pill-popping nation in the world kinda proves it.
Now, don't you have to go take a pill or something? Perhaps, that extra pill is what you need to recognize when someone is mocking YOU and YOUR self-induced paranoia.
Margolies is not a supporter of the North Korean regime, and it's wrong to imply he is. He is a respected reporter and author who knows a lot more about these issues that the right-wing nuts who post here.
I suppose you think the 58 years of isolation have been a success. Or do you think the US should start a war with North Korea just to show how powerful and righteous it is?
You people are not all that good with sarcasm are ya? Oh, never mind, it's because I'm mocking YOU that YOU don't get it. If I were mocking the right wingers...well, you *may* get it then (emphasis on "may").
And I'm not even going to answer your idiotic question. You answer it yourself with anything you want to hear. Y'all are as lost a cause as the Right Wing. Same shit bu standing on the opposite side of the street...and only because that's the one with the shade.
You must mean that the difference between the US and North Korea is that in the US, it took several weeks for the Security Organs to coordinate a brutal attack on OWS; while in North Korea it would probably take less time.
I'm waiting for the next T-Party open air rally, with all the gun toting, tricorn hat wearing loonies who infest them. Will the police break them up? Or do they recognize that the T-Party is a pro-regime group like the million or so Koreans who were encouraged to show up in Pyongyang for the funeral of Kim Jong-Il.
Do you have any idea what a strawman of an argument you've going, Leesasky? BTW, lemme ask you, what makes you such an expert in North Korea? Have you lived there? Did your parents? Anyone you know? And are you actually admitting that those people in N. Korea were "encouraged" (at the point of a gun) to show up...unlike in...hmmmm...say Cuba? Or Syria? Or Libya? Where do you people draw the line? These are serious questions, I truly want to understand how you rationalize stuff to fit your ideas and position on things.
PS: When I say *you* I don't mean you personally but you people in the left wing.
I have never lived in North Korea, as you surely know. If you know the answer, why ask the question?
I seriously doubt that a million people showed up in the main square in Pyongyang for the funeral of Kim Jong-Il because there was a gun pointed at them. Many of them were soldiers obeying orders (like US soldiers obey orders), others were probably mobilized by neighbourhood committees the government uses to spy on people and keep them in line. Many of those present may also have been government employees who were ordered to show up. And possibly there were some people who actually believed the propaganda about Kim, and sincerely mourned him.
In many parts of the US, there is a "patriotic" view of things which it would be very foolish to oppose in public. In some places it would be foolish to speak out against Christianity. In some places it's smart to join a church, not because you believe what's preached there, but because there's community pressure to be a "churchgoing Christian". In some instances violence is used to pressure people into conformity, but more often it's subtle -- if you want a good job, or a promotion, or to sell your products, or to run for office, it's strongly advisable that you get on board with "the way we do things here". I would guess that in North Korea, these pressures are much more intense, and backed by state violence. But they exist in the US too, and state violence (Occupy Wall Street's removal from parks, etc) is not unheard of either.
I think you have a wildly distorted view of what the Left is all about, derived from propaganda put out by people who want you to fear and hate it, because they are afraid of losing their advantages if society were more democratic and fair.
The Left is not monolithic, any more than the Right is. There are nice lefties and lefties who aren't so nice. Just as the Right goes all the way from John Huntsman to Adolf Hitler, the Left goes all the way from Martin Luther King jr. to Joseph Stalin.
If you ask me why I'm a leftie, I would answer that I think society would be better and happier, fairer and more peaceful, if democracy were extended far beyond its current limits to include the economy. It would be better if there weren't major differences in the amount of wealth people had. It would be better if everyone had easy access (according to their ability and desires) to a full education, to full health care, and to an economically secure old age. It would be better if people could be sure that they wouldn't be treated unfairly at work, and that they had the same chance of promotion as anyone else. It would be better if America stood consistently with people seeking social justice around the world, and worked closely with other countries to build a peaceful world. It would be better if America shared its wealth and skills with less fortunate people, not so as to corral them into being "staunch allies", but because we're all brothers and sisters and we need to help each other. America also has much to learn from people who may not be as wealthy, but have much important knowledge, wisdom, skill and experience to share. It would be better if America let go of its desire to achieve "full spectrum dominance" over others, and instead joined the rest of the human species in solving the problems we all face, like climate change and many others.
I believe that this vision of America is certainly idealistic, but it is a vision America could work towards, while knowing it might never actually achieve it fully. I believe that the most promising means to get Americans to support my program is through peaceful, democratic organizing, through mutual education, and through a willingness to face up to the flaws in American society and resolve to try to overcome them collectively, rather than throw up our hands and say things will always be the same as they are now.
Not everyone on the Left would agree with me on all this. Some might add other goals, some might disagree with my approach. Some might say that violence is needed, others might say that less sweeping reforms are sufficient. That's what lefties argue about in general, and of course there are many differences on specific issues..
I don't support the kind of government that exists in North Korea. I regard it as an abomination.
I am more sympathetic to the way they do things in Cuba, which have been much distorted by propaganda, Canadians can visit Cuba quite easily, and many people I know have been there. It is poor, and free speech and other freedoms are curtailed. But when you compare it with other Caribbean countries, it stands head and shoulders above them in education and health, in freedom from crime and drugs, and in other ways.
Syria is a family dictatorship, not a left wing regime. I detest the Assad regime, and admire the incredible courage of the Syrian people who daily risk their lives to oppose it. I'm also aware the the US and Israel have long valued the "stability" of the Assad regime.
Qaddafi thought he was bringing about a left wing revolution in Libya, but his leftism, if you can call it that, was unique to him and quickly became an excuse for his family dictatorship. He appeared to be unaware of this, and thought his people would defend him and his revolution. I don't regard Qaddafi as a leftist, but as a dictator who used leftist rhetoric to justify his greed and lust for power.
I hope you have had the patience to wade through my verbiage. I have treated your question seriously, and I hope I my answer has been useful.
One final point: Jesus said, don't worry about the splinter in someone else's eye, but about the beam in your own. Americans are are very prone to criticize others. They should reflect that others look at them and see some of those same flaws in American society. Americans may not be able to solve the problems of the Syrians, etc. But they can surely try to solve their own problems.
Way too much dribble for me to read but thanks for answering my question. And, NO! I don't expect you to realize or see what I'm trying to prove: that y'all know nothing and should shut the fuck up and let people chart their own destiny. Good, bad or indifferent, it's their inherent right and they don't need you - right, left or in between - meddling in their affairs. You think you got that much? You Lefties are exactly the same as your empire: little walking, talking, meddling, fucking up machines. The damage you can't do with weapons, you cause it with your mouths.
Sorry, I have to come back to this little gem:
"I seriously doubt that a million people showed up in the main square in Pyongyang for the funeral of Kim Jong-Il because there was a gun pointed at them. Many of them were soldiers obeying orders (like US soldiers obey orders), others were probably mobilized by neighbourhood committees the government uses to spy on people and keep them in line."
Semantics, semantics. And you eagerly hang your hat on the phrase "point of a gun" (which, not that you would notice is representative of "involuntary" and not literal) and go on to describe...~drum roll!~ exactly the point I was hinting at. That it was staged! This is utterly priceless! Still, I have no illusions of y'all EVER seeing your hypocrisy and learning a lesson.
Great post, Leezasky. Well said!
"Why don't we send the Occupy wall st. crowd to pyongyang? let them set up a tent city there? It will last. . .for tens of minutes before they get a taste of real repression."
Ah yes, the typical right wing idiocy. Because North Korea is repressive, thus it justifies repression in America.
DELETED
Dude, don't ever go there. These right here are the people who are going to save the world. And they will nuke it even if they have to, in order to save it. ~hark~
While teaching English in Czechoslovakia just after the fall of the Communist regime, I found that the people believed nothing the Communists had told them about the United States.
In America the people believe everything that the government tells them about North Korea.
Dwell on that.
Thanks for stating an Unpleasant Truth.
North Korea has a horrible regime. But that regime may be rational, and rational interaction with it might pay off. 58 years of isolation sure hasn't.
If you mean the rational and knowing use of tools of repression then you may be correct.
Yes, I mean that in part. They may also have a rational view of their foreign policy. After all, they have never gone so far as to break the truce with S. Korea or provoke a war with the US; they understand the fundamental importance of good relations with China and OK relations with Japan, and they have never actually repudiated the 6-power negotiations over their nuclear project.
Km Jong-Il was not a nice guy, and had some pretty serious personality flaws, but in general he worked fairly effectively within the limits of his small nation's power to get what he wanted.
The problem I have with North Korea is not its foreign policy, but the ruthless determination of its elite to retain all power, and to inflict misery on the people so as to keep all the paltry wealth of the country for themselves.
But in this they resemble no group so much as the criminals at places like Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan, who do exactly the same thing, though in a wealthier country. In the past 30-40 years they have reorganized the US so as to push over half its people into the "low income or poor" category, while distracting those people with the Hollywood equivalent of the personality cult used to the same effect in North Korea.
Russian joke:
Everything that the communists told us about communism was a lie. Unfortunately, everything they told us about capitalism was the truth.
I can attest to that. I'm living proof of it. Unfortunately, the overwhelming majority of posters here will fight you to the death on that notion. Also unfortunately is the fact that they don't move to those wonderful beacons of truth nations they so much defend.
Michael Rogers: I've been trying to drive that point thru in here for years and...nothing! You understand. I read an obscure little peace on propaganda that put all that into prospective: "Propaganda: Nobody Does It Better Than America" by Paul Weber
http://www.purewatergazette.net/propagandainamerica.htm. In the article, the author says "...Even though communists had total control of the press, the people just tuned it out (except for those who were the most mentally defective). Most people, they assured me, just went about their lives as best they could, paid lip service to the state, and just tried to keep out of the way of the secret police. But hardly anyone really believed the stuff. "
This is fodder for a groundbreaking study in brainwashing and the human condition but these so-called Leftists are the "most mentally defective" referred to in the article. These whackjobs think they're so smart that they've actually convinced themselves that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" and everything the dictators in those totalitarian regimes spew is the absolute truth. While, at the same time, viciously attacking and fighting those who have lived that which they've only read about. I know because I come from one such society and screwed myself just as they did with that reverse psychology crap while thinking that I was so smart. There's no way to drive the point into them that, yes, there are people who are that evil and provide the fodder to their own government for their ill-fated crusades (i.e. Cuba, North Korea, Syria, Libya, Iran). The tragedy of all this is that you can't take this bunch and send them to those countries (stripped of all their American/capitalist perks like money, technology, etc.) and leave them there for a couple of years to experience that which they condone and defend.
Now, you gotta admit that self-brainwashing is a phenomenon worth of study. What a great subject of study for a Ph.D thesis this site would be!
This is a good article by Eric Margolis, and I'm glad that I don't have anything in it to disagree on (I usually find one or other points in any Margolis column unacceptable and biased) - except his insistence that "North Korea will have to end its nuclear program" in the absence of worldwide nuclear disarmament. But I suppose if other countries are going to give some form of financial, food and technological assistance, they may have some "right" to demand that this aid be spent in a way that does not threaten them.
Margolis also makes this interesting point: "South Korea’s Christian Evangelical hard right won’t end its hostility to Communism". Although I never thought of it before, now that I think about it, it makes sense. It is unfortunate that the hard-working South Koreans have got themselves trapped in this belief system that definitely seems to cloud individual judgement on some important matters of world affairs (just based on my personal experience and encounters). While many ordinary Koreans resent American presence and dominance, they do not seem to have the courage to be totally rid of this "relationship". South Korea also supplies the world's second largest number of Christian missionaries. So any attempts at reconciliation and an eventual reunification with the North would be an interesting challenge - but something that can definitely be handled if there are statesmen on both sides. But the empire would have to get out of the Korean peninsula first.
Duplicate for some reason
I don't believe that the USA and S Korea want Peace and good relations with N Korea.
S Korea did not send an official diplomat or delegation to the State funeral which is a diplomatic slap in the face to N Korea.
It seems if peace was the true goal they wouldn't be antagonizing the North - or starting relations with the new leader by insulting his dead father.
"You’ve got to hand it to the North Koreans, they certainly know how to throw a funeral."
I suppose they've got to be good at something.......If only they knew how to feed themselves.
What is Stalinist in this context? Are we maybe getting into the Orwellian and trying to keep fighting the Cold War ever so subtly? Words should mean something specific not just a label to put on those some don't happen to like. The governments such as the dope pushing, kill crazy regime in Colombia has the worst record of any known but gets a ton of US money. Let's get real.
Occupy foreign policy for the people. End imperialism and insanity. We can simply end the madness which actually the USA and its Western allies began in Korea back in 1950 without any objective evidence of who fired the first shot-- check I F Stone's take on this in his book on the subject-- "Hidden Histoyr of the Korean War."
Since Soviet Archives were opened up we now know that Kim Il-Sung received permission from Joseph Stalin to invade the South with the goal of occupying the enitre peninsula. Thus, the narrative that the North started the war by invading the South is correct.
The people of North Korea know very well how to feed themselves. They are stopped from doing this adequately by a ruthless dictatorship which hogs all the wealth and holds the people in misery.
The US Census Bureau has reported that over half of Americans are "low income or poor". Maybe Americans need to do some thinking about the people who hog the wealth of their country and ruthlessly push millions into poverty.
the 1% there know very well how to feed themselves, look at little/tubby Kim the third !
Almost looks like 'Eric Cartman' from Southpark
pampered well fed fat little fcuker isn't he !
good to see the dynasty alive and thriving in its third generation of royalness in NK.
This is a good article as far as it goes. Where it does not go, is into the unfinished history of the 1994 framework agreement that the US signed with the DPRK. That history is unfinished because as it has been written to date, it only contains the Bush II regime's propaganda version.
The 1994 framework agreement consists of 4 pages of very easy reading for those who are interested:
http://www.kedo.org/pdfs/AgreedFramework.pdf
The US motivation for the agreement was largely based upon fears that DPRK's graphite moderated nuclear reactors were a significant source of plutonium in its spent fuel, which could be fairly easily reprocessed into a weapons grade fuel.
The DPRK motivation appears to have been primarily their desire for a non-aggression treaty with the US.
The gist of the treaty, was that the DPRK would shut down, place under IAEA inspection, and eventually dismantle its Graphite Moderated Nuclear reactors, reprocessing facilities, and spent fuel and byproducts. They would honour their commitments under the NNPT. In return for these actions, the US would facilitate design, financing, and construction of two Light Water Moderated Reactors, which do not result in the large quantities of Plutonium output. The US would assure the provision of Heavy oil as an alternative fuel for heating and power generation until the light water reactors came online.
In addition the US would assure the DPRK of non-aggression, and the two countries would work toward normalization of relations. The dismantlement of the Graphite Moderated plants and removal of spent fuel and Plutonium were to be begun after the first of the Light Water reactors came online.
While DPRK met all of its commitments under the agreement through the turn of the century, the US and its partners made very little progress indeed on the provision of the Light water reactors, which were supposed to have been coming online by 2003. While the Clinton government made some progress towards normalization, the Bush government refused to rule out aggression, either conventional or nuclear, accused DPRK of a clandestine uranium enrichment program, and appended North Korea to the "Axis of Evil" as listed in Bush's State of the Union Address. In October 2002, Bush's envoy to the DPRK claimed that North Korean officials had admitted to uranium enrichment. North Korea denied this, but the excuse was used to cut off heavy oil shipments in the midst of a cold Korean winter and stop progress towards the Light water reactors. US propaganda at the time, suggested that the heavy oil had been a grant in aid that the US was not obliged to continue. It had not been a grant in aid, but a treaty obligation in return for DPRK voluntary compliance with US requests.
DPRK responded by restarting their Graphite reactors, and expelling inspectors.
The North Korean testing of nuclear weapons which followed has been based upon plutonium as a weapons grade fuel. It is noteworthy that the reprocessing of spent fuel to isolate weapons grade plutonium is many times simpler and less costly than the enrichment of uranium. It is this that makes the accusation of uranium enrichment by a country that had voluntarily placed its plutonium facilities under seal and inspection seem ridiculous on the face of it.