EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Rise Up or Die
- Rallying Cry: Citizens Worldwide to Unite in 'March Against Monsanto'
- A 'Nonviolent Army of Love' Rises in North Carolina to Face Down Rightwing's Assault on Progress
- The Latest Lie: IRS Targeted Conservatives
- Genetically Modified Democracy: Monsanto and Congress Move to Stomp on Your Rights
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Big Lie: Wall Street has Destroyed the Wonder That Was America
Imagine a vast field on which a terrible battle has recently been fought, the bare ground cratered by fusillade after fusillade of heavy artillery, trees reduced to blackened stumps, wisps of toxic gas hanging in the gray, and corpses everywhere.
A terrible scene, made worse by the sound of distant laughter, because somehow, on the heights commanding the dead zone, the officers’ club has made it through intact. From its balconies flutter bunting, and across the blasted landscape there comes a chorus of hearty male voices in counterpoint to the wheedling of cadres of wheel-greasers, the click of betting chips, the orotund declamations of a visiting congressional delegation: in sum, the celebratory hullabaloo of a class of people that has sent entire nations off to perish but whose only concern right now is whether the ’11 is ready to drink and who’ll see to tipping the servants. The notion that there might be someone or some force out there getting ready to slouch toward the buttonwood tree to exact retribution scarcely ruffles the celebrants’ joy.
Occupy Wall StreetAh, Wall Street. As it was in the beginning, is now, and hopes to God it ever will be, world without end. Amen.
Or so it seems to me. It was in May 1961 that a series of circumstances took me from the hushed precincts of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, where I was working as a curatorial assistant in the European Paintings Department, to Lehman Brothers, to begin what for the next 30 years would be an involvement—I hesitate to call it “a career”—in investment banking. I would promote and execute deals, sit on boards, kiss ass, and lie through my teeth: the whole megillah. In consequence of which, I would wear Savile Row and carry a Hermès briefcase. I had Mme. Claude’s home number in Paris and I frequented the best clubs in a half-dozen cities. But I had a problem: I was unable to develop the anticommunitarian moral opacity that is the key to real success on Wall Street.
I had my doubts from the beginning. A few months after I started to work downtown, I ran into an old friend from college and before, a man later to become one of New York’s most esteemed writers and editors.
“So,” he asked, “how do you like what you’re doing now?”
“I like it quite a lot,” I said. And this was true: these were new frontiers for me, the pace was lively, the money was good enough ($6,500 a year), and there was so much to learn. But there was one aspect of Wall Street that I found morally confusing if not distasteful: “There’s one thing that bothers me, though. It’s this: on the one hand the New York Stock Exchange has sent its president, the estimable G. Keith Funston, out into the countryside, supported by an expensive, extensive advertising campaign, to exhort the proletariat to Own your share of America! As if buying 50 shares of IBM or GM in 1961 is as much of a civic duty as buying a $100 war bond in 1943.”
I then added, “But here’s the thing. At the same time as Funston’s out there doing his thing, if you ask any veteran Wall Street pro how the Street works, the first thing he’ll tell you is: The public is always wrong. Always.” I paused to let that sink in, then confessed, “I have to tell you, I have trouble squaring that circle.”
And that was back when Wall Street was basically honest, brought into line thanks in part to Ferdinand Pecora’s 1933 humiliation of the great bankers of the Jazz Age and even more so because of the communitarian exigencies forced on the nation by war. From Pearl Harbor to V-J Day, greed was definitely not good, and that proscriptive spirit lingered on right up to 1970, when everything started to change, and the traders began their long march through our great houses of finance, with the inevitable consequence that the Street’s moral bookkeeping grew more and more contorted, its corruptions more elaborate, its self-interest less and less governable. What someone has called the “Greed Wars” began.
But now, I think, the game is at long last over.
As 2011 slithers to its end, none of the major problems that led to the crisis point three years ago have really been solved. Bank balance sheets still reek. Europe day by day becomes a financial black hole, with matter from the periphery being sucked toward the center until the vortex itself collapses. The Street and its ministries of propaganda have fallen back on a Big Lie as old as capitalism itself: that all that has gone wrong has been government’s fault. This time, however, I don’t think the argument that “Washington ate my homework” is going to work. This time, a firestorm is going to explode about the Street’s head—and about time, too.
It’s funny; the Big Lie has a long pedigree. A year or so ago, I was leafing through Ron Chernow’s indispensable history of the Morgan financial interests, and found this interesting exchange between FDR and Russell Leffingwell, a Morgan partner and Washington fixer, a sort of Robert Strauss of his day. It dates from the summer of 1932, with FDR not yet in office:
“You and I know,” wrote Leffingwell, “that we cannot cure the present deflation and depression by punishing the villains, real or imaginary, of the first post war decade, and that when it comes down to the day of reckoning nobody gets very far with all this prohibition and regulation stuff.” To which FDR replied: “I wish we could get from the bankers themselves an admission that in the 1927 to 1929 period there were grave abuses and that the bankers themselves now support wholeheartedly methods to prevent recurrence thereof. Can’t bankers see their own advantage in such a course?” And then Leffingwell again: “The bankers were not in fact responsible for 1927–29 and the politicians were. Why then should the bankers make a false confession?”
This time, I fear, the public anger will not be deflected. Confessions, not false, will be exacted. Occupy Wall Street has set the snowball rolling; you may not think much of OWS—I have my own reservations, although none are philosophical or moral—but it has made America aware of a sinister, usurious process by which wealth has systematically been funneled into fewer and fewer hands. A process in which Washington played a useful supporting role, but no more than that.
Over the next year, I expect the “what” will give way to the “how” in the broad electorate’s comprehension of the financial situation. The 99 percent must learn to differentiate the bloodsuckers and rent-extractors from those in the 1 percent who make the world a better, more just place to live. Once people realize how Wall Street made its pile, understand how financiers get rich, what it is that they actually do, the time will become ripe for someone to gather the spreading ripples of anger and perplexity into a focused tsunami of retribution. To make the bastards pay, properly, for the grief and woe they have caused. Perhaps not to the extent proposed by H. L. Mencken, who wrote that when a bank fails, the first order of business should be to hang its board of directors, but in a manner in which the pain is proportionate to the collateral damage. Possibly an excess-profits tax retroactive to 2007, or some form of “Tobin tax” on transactions, or a wealth tax. The era of money for nothing will be over.
But it won’t just end with taxes. When the great day comes, Wall Street will pray for another Pecora, because compared with the rough beast now beginning to strain at the leash, Pecora will look like Phil Gramm. Humiliation and ridicule, even financial penalties, will be the least of the Street’s tribulations. There will be prosecutions and show trials. There will be violence, mark my words. Houses burnt, property defaced. I just hope that this time the mob targets the right people in Wall Street and in Washington. (How does a right-thinking Christian go about asking Santa for Mitch McConnell’s head under the Christmas tree?) There will be kleptocrats who threaten to take themselves elsewhere if their demands on jurisdictions and tax breaks aren’t met, and I say let ’em go!
At the end of the day, the convulsion to come won’t really be about Wall Street’s derivatives malefactions, or its subprime fun and games, or rogue trading, or the folly of banks. It will be about this society’s final opportunity to rip away the paralyzing shackles of corruption or else dwell forever in a neofeudal social order. You might say that 1384 has replaced 1984 as our worst-case scenario. I have lived what now, at 75, is starting to feel like a long life. If anyone asks me what has been the great American story of my lifetime, I have a ready answer. It is the corruption, money-based, that has settled like some all-enveloping excremental mist on the landscape of our hopes, that has permeated every nook of any institution or being that has real influence on the way we live now. Sixty years ago, if you had asked me, on the basis of all that I had been taught, whether I thought this condition of general rot was possible in this country, I would have told you that you were nuts. And I would have been very wrong. What has happened in this country has made a lie of my boyhood.
There should be more to America, Gore Vidal has written, than who pays tax to whom. It has been in Wall Street’s interest to shrivel our sensibilities as a nation, to shove aside the verities of which General MacArthur spoke at West Point—duty, honor, country—in favor of grubby schemes and scams and “carried interest” calculations. Time, I think, to take the country back.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


118 Comments so far
Show AllWhere did the ammo come from to fight this terrible battle. The FED! Take away the FED, and all the money that's used to bankroll this crime is not available.
The Federal Reserve Bank or any other kind of sovereign central bank, has nothing to do with speculation schemes on Wall Street, aside from the trading being done in US dollars.
Will this weird, conspiracy-theory-with-a-pinch-of-anti-semitism, "The Fed is the casue of all our problems" stuff please stop.
Sure the Fed could use some policy reforms - most notably we have to avoid ever returning to the inflation-scare-mongering, high unemployment, low-wage, family farmer destroying, 20% discount rate policies of the Volker** and Greenspan years - exactly the opposite of the zero-discount rate policies of today. But get rid of our central bank altogether? So, are we all going to start using Canadian dollars or Euros?
--------------------------------------
"If I had to name a Federal Reserve chairman that did a little bit of good, that would be Paul Volcker." - Ron Paul
"But get rid of our central bank altogether?"
the problem is that it is not "your" bank, friend, it is "theirs".
Then that is what has to change. That's the solution, not eliminating it.
ROT -- of course the FED is involved in manipulating the economy -- how could
you possibly say otherwise? Congress should be setting economic policy -
not the FED -- and that includes employment policies!
The FED is about profit for their members -- not the general welfare of our
nation --
But noting the Ron Paul reference, I see the immense blind spot which
dictates your post.
Like a broken clock, Ron Paul is right about the FED -- it should be eliminated.
I'd also add that -- perhaps I read the article too quickly -- but didn't notice
anything about ending MONOPOLIES.
Until we do that we have about as much chance of succeeding as we do
at winning a game of MONOPOLY, INC.
"We’ve seen this play many times before, the script never changes. The central bank chiefs claim that they are just offering liquidity assistance for “temporarily” impaired assets, but, of course, that’s not true. Two years after the Fed began its purchases of toxic MBS from US banks, all of those same assets are still on the Fed’s balance sheet. The Fed’s has become a “bad bank” where the stinkpile of unmarketable dreck the banks created via financial alchemy is housed. Eventually, the losses will be passed on to the taxpayers."
Mike Whitney at today's counterpunch.org
You are a shill for the banksters pjd. The Fed has been at the center of the momumental financial fraud that nearly tanked the economy, and continues to reek havoc.
The Fed has to go, and you Ron Paul hating, Fed loving bankster bastards ought to go to hell too.
The dollar won't go away if we abolish the Fed. That's just another of your many bankster lies.
Your patronizing but total obliviousness (or outright mendacity) about the FED is all anyone needs to understand which side of the 99 v 1 that you support.
Alluding to central bankster collusion with Wall St, as being "weird, conspiracy-theory-with-a-pinch-of-anti-semitism," is nonsense and worse, an insidious ad hominem attack on serious and knowledgeable folks -- and supporting an open discussion.
You ought to be ashamed of yourself, for being so absolutely certain and insistent of the correctness of provable nonsense and deceitful hate-mongering as well.
FACT: the fed is owned by banksters, as it's private corporatist entity, and is as FEDERAL as FEDEX is.
The current central bankers blaming the government is like a dictator blaming his chauffeur.
Where do you Fed bugs come from? What is your weird obsession really about? Every sovereign country has a central bank, by whatever name they choose to call it.
Robert Hall: Weird obsession?
.......Here's a little history that might help you understand more: http://publiccentralbank.com/. It's worth the time if you're serious about knowing how this private entity is a danger to the 99%.
The Big Lies are:
1. Rich people create jobs
2. The rich deserve their wealth
3. The rich are patriotic
4. The rich are already overtaxed
5. The rich are actually really nice people and just like us
6. They got rich by being smarter
7. Outsourcing and globalization helped us all
8. No laws were broken
9. No one saw the crash coming and it couldn't have been helped
10. The rich already pay their fair share
And on and on and on....
We need to tax WEALTH - I'd start with a 10% yearly tax on any wealth over 10 million.
Thomas sez: "The Street and its ministries of propaganda have fallen back on a Big Lie as old as capitalism itself: that all that has gone wrong has been government’s fault."
***
Ah, yes. The old 'ventriloquist blaming the dummy for a botched line' routine.
G Sez: Great closing line!
And this is a great article. I love reading the insider's take on things, and how they came to reflect such utter corruption. Basically, this article's content is akin to a 21st century version of similar admissions offered by Smedley Butler and Jack Perkins.
I like the image of the mist of excrement that has come to surround all things, business-related.
Same here. It means a lot that he's an insider, with 30 years in investment banking.
it means he's probably got a wad of someone else's money stashed away somewhere.
(computer duplicated the message)
The 1% are owed a great debt of gratitude.
What will it take for you all to realize that aggressive wealth accumulation and greed is REAL charity!?!?
At what point will you finally see that the 1% has YOUR BEST INTERESTS at heart?!?
When will you people look in your own hearts and have FAITH that the 1% are chosen by GOD and are here to serve YOU!?!?!
The only thing Americans care about is MONEY!!!! Can't you see that the 1% is trying to HELP YOU and teach you how to live without it?!?!
Why, my fellow Americans, must you be so blind to the goodwill, intelligence, foresight, and compassion of your rightful masters?
WHY?!?!
Mark my words, the 1% won't tolerate your insolence forever. Woe be to them that do not run and hide when the master returns.
When the master returns? What are you bloviating about?
Don't you recognize satire??
Satire probably doesn't make the best comment.
The "wonder that was America" began as colonization for income.
The Revolution was concerned with cash - a concern by those who had some wealth at the loss of wealth to regulation by a distant government which did not return sufficient political voice or autonomy, and attempted to crush that dissent.
At no time were environmental or civil rights for all an issue.
During the 1800s, unlimited expansion for profit was encouraged.
During this time, species were exterminated because wealthy influences felt that the free grazing land (some interests were those of the original colonizing nation. England became a nation of beefeaters due to the cheap domestic cattle. The cowboys who served them were illiterate killers of anything that seemed to interfere with the profits.), the free minerals (gold is useful for tooth fillings, being near hardness to enamel, and now is useful for electronics. It has NO other intrinsic utilitarian value. The 7th cavalry was posted to protect Lakota and other treaty rights - instead they protected illegal miners in the Black Hills. General military staff were quoted as stating the indigenous peoples should be exterminated)
At no time were the rights of any indigenous species of life, or of environmental health considered as important.
When Constitutional Amendments intended to protect newly freed slaves were enshrined, the Supreme Court puppets of the wealthy and proto-corporate (early corporations were chartered for a limited time and had legal restrictions placed on their activities) decided that business entities had the same rights as "persons." At no time since has any elected or appointed official seriously challenged that corrupt determination.
The regulation that occurred in the late 19th and early 20th century was due to the predatory actions of some wealthy individuals and corporations affecting other wealthy competitors, who had enough financial political power to press for change. Due also to alarm at the rise of Marxist economic ideology, some regulation arose or was continued in the first 1/2 of the 20th c.
Satire and farce is status quo in the very governing of this nation:
With a president promising peace (twice in a row now) and pressing war.
With rage so ridiculous over very real environmental health concerns.
With the prating of "freedom" as an attribute of this nation while it engages in torture, aggression as violent as that of Nazi Germany, and the mixing of corporate and government as complete as fascist Italy.
With two presidents now operating in clear violation of executive Constitutional powers.
With national to local governments turning blind eyes at fraud across the entire history of the nation, refusing to prosecute relevant laws,
With Supreme Court Justices and Presidents clearly in violation of law, misdemeanor (in the sense of acting unethically as it was meant when written in Constitution), good behavior (such as ruling in favor of entities from which the Justice has and has had profitable business dealings).
We do not have to speak ironically or satirically. Those whom you idealize and revere (whether the entire slate of ridiculous candidates, holding or acting as if they hold power - which they do. they may arrest and kill legally through ordering it done.
This is the only power of government - now being farmed out to private security corporations here and in nations the US controls have been acting in these darkly comical fashions for the history of the nation.
You, yourselves believing in improbables as some kind of reality "freedom" when freedom lead always and only to accumulating as much as possible, "duty" to those who feel you exist only for this slavish "duty." Many Afghan and other tribes kill their own children out of "honor."
Integrity is individual, never given up, as any formal giveaway ALWAYS disappears into farce.
In internet comment, satire and irony are often pursued too briefly to be clear. We laugh most at favored familiar comedians. Anonymous amateurs often merely confuse readers when butted up against the pros.
"There will be prosecutions and show trials."
with the emphasis on "show".
Mr. Thomas seems to be channeling a bit of "Das Kapital" here.
Is it possible that the capitalist system itself might be questioned?
Das Kapital? I'd say it reads more like Der Stürmer. "Bloodsuckers"? Check it out: tinyurl.com/dieAusgesaugten. Inevitable, justified violence? Sure: tinyurl.com/dieRache These financiers really have wronged us! We aren't responsible, even if we do elect and reelect representatives who confuse their influence with our welfare -- career politicians with a vested interest in cultivating wealthy friends using the most effective tool at their disposal, legislation. No, Wall Street is the cause of our distress. tinyurl.com/dieUrsache. Time, I think, to take the country back. Let's make the bastards pay.
Exceptional article, CD. Thomas nails it. I so look forward to I look forward to what he calls “the focused tsunami of retribution . . . To make the bastards pay, properly, for the grief and woe they have caused . . . in a manner in which the pain is proportionate to the collateral damage.” (bearing in mind there has been considerable loss of life in illegal wars, as well as jobs, hearth and home for millions.)
Some plead for a “truth and reconciliation” commission, but in South Africa such undeserved amnesty only kept the neolibs firmly entrenched. No, what’s sorely needed is a “truth and retribution” commission, which leaves the perps dead or otherwise unable to ever . . . ever inflict themselves once more on humanity.
Thomas again:
“When the great day comes, Wall Street will pray for another Pecora, because compared with the rough beast now beginning to strain at the leash, Pecora will look like Phil Gramm. Humiliation and ridicule, even financial penalties, will be the least of the Street’s tribulations. There will be prosecutions and show trials. There will be violence, mark my words. Houses burnt, property defaced. I just hope that this time the mob targets the right people in Wall Street and in Washington. (How does a right-thinking Christian go about asking Santa for Mitch McConnell’s head under the Christmas tree?)”
But really, which is worse, the rough beast of vengeance or Phil Gramm?
This is a good piece. Such fine images, and wonderful expressions. Quotable, indeed.
"Wall street has destroyed the wonder that was America." What we call America was certainly a land of wonder and diversity. Then Columbus landed.
There are some delicious ironies in WallStreet's behavior. They think they make their money by taking calculated risks. But they hedge their investments with so much unaccountable insurance (credit default swaps) that the risk ends up being 'owned' by EVERYONE, especially MainStreet. The REWARD, well, that still goes to WallStreet (no 'pooling' allowed there). The pooled risk, which once was the risk of an individual investment defaulting, is now the risk of the entire edifice of financial capitalism collapsing, which as we've seen is a 'credit freeze' gun pointed at MainStreets head, demanding real wealth to prop up WallStreet's fake 'profits'.
The second delicious irony in WallStreet is its idea of 'collective bargaining'. I'm sure none of the captains of WallStreet would call himself 'pro-labor-union'. They find unions 'socialist' and prefer the open air of 'free market' individualist decisionmaking. And, in this guise, they encouraged governments to take off the Pecora shackles so that they could invest the world into success. But, what did WallStreet BUILD out of a deregulated finance sector? Primarily, the worlds most powerful UNION: the Bankers union. So powerful is this union that if just a few banks, somewhere in the world (like Greece), threaten to fall (aka go on strike), the ENTIRE bankers union threatens to go on strike as well, collapsing the credit markets, making business impossible. And so fearful are central bankers of this union that they will write checks on any amount to prevent that union from going on strike. Checks that, essentially, transfer value from Mainstreet to Wallstreet. That's a delicious irony about Wallstreet 'capitalism'. Thomas is right: if we don't fight this now, their power will only grow, and Mainstreet will fall to a neofeudal future.
Very interesting article.
What Wall Street has created, with the aid of their apparatchiks in Washington, is a magical casino.
When the slick gamblers win big they keep the winnings. {Privatized profits}
When the big gamblers lose their shirts, EVERYONE, including the hapless suckers in line at the Greyhound bus station have to chip in and cover the losses.
{Socialized losses}
The "house" -- essentially the public -- never wins.
With a casino like that, who wouldn't want to make the wildest, craziest bets imaginable?
However, the casino is only open to the BIG players with connections -- investment bankers, hedge fund managers, etc. Not the riffraff among the 99.9%.
As Mr. Thomas warns, for Wall Street "the public is always wrong. Always."
Yes. I was actually describing the method by which WallStreet privatized gains and socialized losses. WallStreet gets to purchase insurance against personal loss of investment, but who sells it that insurance? Ultimately, Mainstreet does (through the systematizing of risk, and later, the bailouts of the central banks and governments). You didn't know you were covering WallStreet's losses? Shucks, I guess you didn't get the memo...
"who wouldn't want to make the wildest, craziest bets imaginable" Exactly: we fix this or they WILL do it again. Who doesn't like a free lunch?
Much to my current misery I missed that memo. Because I missed that memo I've gone from six figure income and secured retirement with, what I thought were secured investments in real estate, to bankruptcy. At 60, the prospects of recouping and recovering are bleak. I think someone should be making reparations but there is no Pecora Commission on the horizon. For missing the memo, I've had to pay a disproportionately high price.
I hope Thomas is right: . . .the time will become ripe for someone to gather the spreading ripples of anger and perplexity into a focused tsunami of retribution. To make the bastards pay, properly, for the grief and woe they have caused.
I don't want their heads. I just want justice for the 99%. Justice calls for reparation in direct proportion to that which was taken.
"Once people realize how Wall Street made its pile, understand how financiers get rich, what it is that they actually do, the time will become ripe for someone to gather the spreading ripples of anger and perplexity into a focused tsunami of retribution. To make the bastards pay, properly, for the grief and woe they have caused."
Beware the fascist demagogue that will attempt to rise instead, and direct the rage toward scapegoats ...
"The 99 percent must learn to differentiate the bloodsuckers and rent-extractors from those in the 1 percent who make the world a better, more just place to live." - Michael Thomas
Bloody dinosaur excrement apologism. Corporations, especially "too big" and multinational corporate holding companies who've gradually consolidated the legal fiction of "corporate personhood" since 1886 are THE PROBLEM. Too many First World Baby Boomers, their surviving elders and Gen X brats addicted to Big Corporate "free trade" dividend wealth generated by foreign labor in US & EU owned and leased, offshored manufacturing plants in the Third World have become national and global PARASITES. They are whiningly dependent on a combination of rentier income from exploited domestic lower classes and the sweat of foreigners working with little or no labor or environmental protections. That is where they derive far too much of their wealth while they actually earn far too little (or nothing) from their own labor (and no, online day trading isn't labor).
Fuck the US and EU 1% and their entire neo-liberal Wall Street/ECB/European Commission/World Bank/IMF mega-vampire squid apparatus. It is destroying the U.S. and EU and wrecking much of the rest of the planet. It assumes (1) limitless capitalist "growth" exploiting limitless natural resources and (2) infinitely sustainable First World middle-class lifestyles (insanely exported as an economic model to over-populated "developing" nations like China and India) and (3) ignores dangerous Third World human over-population pressures on regional habitats. All those assumptions are viewed by neo-liberal economists as "externalities" that have nothing to do with the political bribery, unprovoked military and police violence, and crushing of global working-classes that they view as their "normal" cost of doing business.
The scorched earth pluto-libertarian system of buying the critical decision making process (conventional politics) using subjective self-serving politicians and economists on the plutocratic hook is ENIVIRONMENTAL AND MORAL SUICIDE FOR HUMANITY.
The only thing that can save humankind right now (in light of global warming acceleration taking place from methane mega-releases from melting permafrost and receding sea ice whose volumes have yet to be fully measured and factored into the existing math on warming rates) is global, environmentally sustainable, democratic, scientifically objective habitat planning & oversight--with enforcement capabilities operated by a globally elected, democratic body of scientists (not corporate funded in any way and precluded from any corporate revolving door jobs after their stint as biosphere planning and oversight representatives) to plan humane economic and human population down-growths and more equitable sharing of resources (renewable and finite) on a global basis with a focus on regional habitat harmonization of species, land, water and other resources use.
The Wall Street "ethos" can never be sufficiently purified. It and everything it has historically stood for, will always devolve into devouring the earth and usurping any attempt at actual democracy--including democratic republics. This is because it cannot resist the temptation to participate with other monied corporate interests in buying politicians, economists and mass media. This is a subjective, greed-controlled decision making process for resource allocation that now threatens all of our lives and those of our progeny.
This intellectually constipated Wall Street brontosaur Michael Thomas can't think outside the capitalist Wall Street box because that is all he as ever known or tried to understand.
Those of us who want ourselves and our progeny to inhabit a decent, environmentally sustainable economy and sufficiently diverse and prolific biosphere can no longer afford to think like egregiously failed capitalist dinosaurs.
Thank you, Metal- and fuck you. You need to transfer your butt-plug to your mouth. You'll accomplish two things: turn off the noise, and relieve some pressure. You'll feel better, and so will we.
Ricardohead -- What exactly is your problem? I only skimmed Metal's comment and didn't get much from his diatribe but so what.
Why the tremendous hostility from you? And why are you speaking for "we"?
If you don't think his comments are worth reading or rebutting then why not skip them?
You'll have to be much more specific than a vague tantrum here if you want a cogent reply.
It's pretty simple really: one hissy fit (your long post) provokes another (my short post). Lay off the cliche-ridden invective, and your highly predictable 'arguments', and I'll go back to sleep.
Pardon me if I don't applaud Doug MacArthur who was even more of a war monger than Harry Truman. Truman who got us into that silly Cold War and Korean War fiasco had to restrain MacArthur. MacArthur was also eager to use the army against the bonus marchers in 1932.
"... operated by a globally elected, democratic body of scientists (not corporate funded in any way and precluded from any corporate revolving door jobs after their stint as biosphere planning and oversight representatives) to plan humane economic and human population down-growths and more equitable sharing of resources (renewable and finite) on a global basis with a focus on regional habitat harmonization of species, land, water and other resources use."
I've worked with scientists off and on my whole life. I'm not inclined to trust them any more than any other group of reasonably educated / cultured individuals. In fact, I wonder if various groups of artists instead might be a superior guiding group, but I don't know ...
I'm an artist and have worked with artists in my life. We're just as deluded and incompetent as everybody else. Artists as a whole have good intent but we all know what road is paved with the stone of good intentions.
That said, while I agree with much of the author's take I don't think throwing capitalism in the trash can is the solution. Capital is certainly a rough beast but instead of shooting it we need to gat it back in harness.
On e thing that needs addressing is the corporate charter. We the people grant corporations the right to exist and we get to say what the rules are. There was a time when corporate charters specified what public good the corporation would serve and if they failed to live up to that obligation the corporation would be disolved. Corporations used to have a limited life after which time the assets would be dispersed. Coporations were limited to one specific activity. And of course there still is a law limiting the size of corporations but nobody since Jimmy Carter has thought to enforce that nicety.
On the banking side we only need to go back to pre-Reagan regulations and the sky starts to clear a whole bunch.
Don't get me wrong, I'm all in favor of replacing the infamous bronze bull with a guillotine but after lopping of a sufficient number of heads to make a good strong point we should send the the sufficiantly repentent to reeducation camps, revamp the rules of the game and vow to never forget. But in eighty years our great grand kids will repeat the same folly again. So it goes unto the end of the world.
"But in eighty years our great grand kids will repeat the same folly again. So it goes unto the end of the world."
Not if they are raised to consider that man's greatest strength is his humanity and compassion, not the money in the bank or the things he owns.
Actually wasn't that the biggest part of Jesus'. Mohammed's and all the other great prophets teachings. I am not real sure just which religion it is that promotes greed at all costs.
I encourage you to better familiarize yourself with the present state of the biosphere (better than your remarks suggest to me). I think you will find that there may not BE another 80 years for humanity to make another major mistake and start over to solve the thoroughly globalized problems of laissez-faire-to-neo-liberal capitalism.
We've got one take and we've got to get it right and fast. Mother Nature neither saves nor spares: Those species that fail to adapt or who over-consume their critical resources or unsustainably foul their environment cease to exist.
Humanity can't come to the table to discuss a realistic solution to its present problems with one selfish hand behind its back. There has to be a globally predominant willingness to work honestly and equitably together here and a better, more transparent, accessible and accountable decision making process or it won't work.
Plato was afraid of artists, I think, for thinking too much in terms of the celestial and the ideal and having too much influence on his earthly Athens that was only a distant troubled reflection of unattainable ideals as he saw it. He valued cool reason and would sequester charismatic artists and poets to an island where they could enjoy each others' company without constantly stirring up trouble for less imaginative "mainstreamers."
I think artists in America since the late 1980s have increasingly surrendered insightful, compelling, significantly positive influence on America. Since the Reagan era, most American artists' creative courage was beaten out of them by the corporatist high volume, least common denominator markets-uber-alles ethos.
Most Nazis only revered art works of the distant, pre-Expressionist past and regarded modern art that more accurately reflected the present world around them as a threat to their economic, educational and mass media message control and, therefore, something to be designated as inferior and degenerate (except as a commodity to be looted from Europe and Russia and liquidated for cash value when needed).
Artists over longer periods of time (because it takes longer for the range of sensitivities, emotions and thoughts expressed in their often very compressed works to soak into a society by some form of collective osmosis) are important for the same reason authentic journalism is important: Done well, their work holds up a powerful mirror of a society to itself so it can see where it is, where it is presently going, and where it may go depending on various possibilities or probabilities. Where are these functions in corporately manufactured "popular" American culture today? Nowhere.
Most Americans these days know not where they come from, know not where they are collectively going and do not care. Even at this environmentally and economically Pompeiian late date. They have been complicit in reducing themselves to both commodities and markets where everything and everyone is for sale and corporations, plutocrats and Mammon are the only true gods and acceptable arbiters of "right and wrong."
Art is mostly (but not always) a slower mirror, while true journalism is a daily mirror that filters out aesthetics for nuts and bolts facts--with rare exceptions like a gorgeous National Geographic photo-journalist spread combining article and pictures.
I would unite my idea of art with my idea of scientific input into and oversight on environmentally sustainable population/resource allocation & planning with a Japanese concept called "wa." This is unifying physical and functional harmony that works as much as possible with what is natural. A thousand year perfected Japanese Buddhist temple garden is a symbolic representation of this. Historically (prior to the 20th century), nature in such a garden was gradually, gently shaped more toward a human aesthetic in areas of human habitation as a contrast to completely wild areas that were also preserved. But the crucial natural center of these two ideas were inseparable and understood to be both equally deserving of preservation.
My vision is of a world where human population levels, habitations and activities are much more defined and sustainability-limited by natural processes, naturally occurring regional habitats and scientifically and naturally guided species/resources balances within those regional habitats.
I want to see an optimization of human populations, animal and plant populations, human residential and recreational areas, human economic activity areas (with smaller, ecologically friendly-as-possible distributed industries and family & community farms), green buffer zones and vibrant, somatic evolution wilderness areas.
The science exists now to gradually bring all these things into a long-term sustainable balance and preserve biodiversity. We just need to drag such a dream into existence. What a legacy to leave to our children if we could. What a gift to bring to other struggling civilizations we may one day encounter out among the stars.
One big question is: Does humanity exist to serve corporations? Or do ALL economic entities exist to serve humanity?
Another is: If we suddenly discovered an engine to carry us to those recently discovered 68 planets that may be Earth-like in their "habitable zones" around other Sol-like stars, and we then established communications with sentient life on any those worlds, how would we go among them? As conquistadores? Or as peaceful teachers with lessons worth learning?
I may not live to "seek out new life and new civilizations...to boldly go where no one has gone before," but I want some Earthling to someday. But humanity has to learn how to survive in a much better way long enough to get there from here.
Yes, wall street is responsible for an america where corporate products are now reduced in quantity and quality but not in price. How can that be done in the name of profits when the only criteria for stock price increase is to take over a company and the first measure of business is to make the product as cheap as possible to maximize profit. My america of "quality american made products" has been replaced by Cheap,Cheat and Corrupt american products. And what really gets me is that those goons on wall street think that the people don't realize or are too stupid to know that the one pound size of 16 ounces is reduced to 12 ounces , costs more and may make you sick. Bastards all of them on wall street and those that allow the cheating to continue. How in the hell can they look faces of the young innocent children being raised in this country of their greed. May there be a payback that is commensurate with the crime.
Flunkdaddy's first comment above is vital: First KILL the beast...the FED......Then we must demilitarize the EMPIRE............replace GREED and Stupidity with humaness and a LUST FOR HUMAN SURVIVAL for the good and wondrous gift of simple human existence. 21st Century today is easily the most dangerous and irrational mishmash for the continuation of ANY life on Earth since when the entire BIG BANG first kicked off.!!!....And don't give me any rant that humans can't change......as Eric Fromm..put it: ITS LOVE OR PERISH!
It’s amazing how so many, even on a supposedly progressive site like this, have completely swallowed the Republican propaganda talking point that it’s always – always – government that’s the problem. The Fed. The Fed was created in the second decade of the 20th century to reign in banksters whose greed and fecklessness had led to repeated boom and bust cycles. The Fed was largely a creation of Democrats in Congress while almost all Republicans voted against it. And now a century later the Repugs have managed to twist the truth around that it is the Fed that’s the root of all evil, instead of the malfeasance of Wall St. Greenspan’s hands off policy as Fed chief that led to the recent near market meltdown doesn’t mean the Fed as an institution is faulty. Any institution led by a corrupt chief beholden to those he’s supposed to be regulating will fail.
The Fed did NOTHING "reign (sic) in banksters" and was produced by a cabal of banksters and pols who met on an island luxury resort enclave off the coast of Georgia. The proof is the farming depression of the early 1920s and the Great Depression that commenced in 1929--both of which took place during periods of rampant banking and investment deregulation and wild speculation.
You are a complete ignoramus about the Fed and should read William Greider's Secrets of The Temple and Richard Gross on the subject before you spew anymore bull-caca.
What we need in lieu of a Federal Reserve is a National Infrastructure Bank coupled to a national requirement for State owned banks in all 50 States for State infrastructure/public institution/public service investment. We don't NEED to preserve the US dollar as the key global reserve currency and given bipartisan neo-liberal mismanagement of the national and global economy it will be nearly impossible to keep it as the sole global reserve exchange currency past 2018 (China's currency basket goal) in any case.
METAL: Thank you for your always passionate, well-written, and highly intelligent posts. As for Ms. Mason, she's been apprised about the nature of the Fed on numerous occasions, but like some kind of wind-up toy, reverts back to her favored talking points. One wonders if persons of this nature are hired just to post false memes since they show a robot-like resistance to altering their perspectives even when the facts are placed right before them.
As in the adage, "You are entitled to your own opinion, not your own facts."
BTW: Metal: If you have the time or inclination, I'd be interested in your take on Ron Paul. He seems to have quite a unified chorus of supporters on this site. Some are genuinely sincere about their support for this renegade Republican, with others.... let's just say, the jury is still out.
BTW: Metal: If you have the time or inclination, I'd be interested in your take on Ron Paul. He seems to have quite a unified chorus of supporters on this site. Some are genuinely sincere about their support for this renegade Republican, with others.... let's just say, the jury is still out.
**********
I hope you'll allow me to butt in here, Siouxrose.
I imagine that Ron Paul's charms for what passes for the American left are: a) He's staunchly opposed to American foreign military adventurism, i.e., the entire U. S. imperial project of global domination and b) he's not like all the rest of the politicians---he's different.
Paul sounds popular American themes in his speeches such as self-reliance, individual initiative, and shrinking of government that play well---even in Peoria. In short, he's a right-wing libertarian who stresses the idea of what he calls "liberty" or "freedom" and low taxes. Who wants to argue with that?
The problem is, if his policy prescriptions were ever implemented they would result in the most terrible form of tyranny imaginable: private tyranny. There would be no public recourse, no public control whatsoever over the worst excesses of the huge private tyrannies (corporations) that would rule every aspect of our lives. Under the auspices of right-wing libertarianism, so-called "free market capitalism" would become (as, in fact, it is now) "The Road to Serfdom."
Whyz,
My feelings exactly. What Dr.Paul opposes is one thing. What Dr.Paul supports is another matter.
Good Post. We have to be reminded from time to time what Dr. Paul believes to be an ideal society. Certainly not a vision I could support.
The freedom (or right) to swing one's fist stops at my nose. In a right wing libertarian world I fear my nose would be bloodied many times.
Thomas Gilbert-