Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Newt’s Tax Plan, and Why His Polls Rise the More Outrageous He Becomes
Newt Gingrich has done it again. With his new tax plan he has raised the bar from irresponsibility to recklessness.
Every dollar estimate I’m about to share with you comes from the independent, non-partisan Tax Policy Center – a group whose estimates are used by almost everyone in Washington regardless of political persuasion.
First off, Newt’s plan increases the federal budget deficit by about $850 billion – in a single year!
To put this in perspective, most forecasts of the budget deficit cover ten years. The elusive goal of the White House and many on both sides of the aisle in Congress is to reduce that ten-year deficit by 3 to 4 trillion dollars.
Newt goes in the other direction, with gusto. Increasing the deficit by $850 billion in a single year is beyond the wildest imaginings of the least responsible budget mavens within a radius of three thousand miles from Washington.
Imagine what Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s or Fitch would do if it became law. We’d go directly from a triple-A credit rating to triple X – the veritable porn star of fiscal mayhem. Interest on our debt would become larger than most of the rest of the budget.
Most of this explosion of debt in Newt’s plan occurs because he slashes taxes. But not just anyone’s taxes. The lion’s share of Newt’s tax cuts benefit the very, very rich.
That’s because he lowers their marginal income tax rate to 15 percent – down from the current 35 percent, which was Bush’s temporary tax cut; down from 39 percent under Bill Clinton; down from at least 70 percent in the first three decades after World War II. Newt also gets rid of taxes on unearned income – the kind of income that the super-rich thrive on – capital-gains, dividends, and interest.
Under Newt’s plan, each of the roughly 130,000 taxpayers in the top .1 percent – the richest one-tenth of one percent – reaps an average tax cut of $1.9 million per year. Add what they’d otherwise have to pay if the Bush tax cut expired on schedule, and each of them saves $2.3 million a year.
To put it another way, under Newt’s plan, the total tax bill of the top one-tenth of one percent drops from around 38 percent of their income to around 10 percent.
What about low-income households? They get an average tax cut of $63 per year.
Oh, I almost forgot: Newt also slashes corporate taxes.
I’m not making this up.
This might be amusing if Newt were just being old Newt – if this were another infamous hot-air bubble emerging from an always provocative, sometimes clever, often bizarre mind.
But it’s the tax plan of the leading candidate for president of one of the two major political parties of the United States.
And it comes at a time when America’s super rich are raking in a larger portion of total income and wealth than at any time over the last eighty years, and when their marginal taxes are lower than they’ve been in three decades; a time when the nation’s long-term budget deficit is causing cuts in education and infrastructure which will impair our future and that of our children, and when safety nets and social services are being slashed.
Can Newt get away with this?
Probably — because his plan also comes at a time when Americans are so cynical about the major institutions of our society that someone who offers huge, outrageous plans holds a special fascination: The whole system is so awful, people tell themselves, why not just jettison everything and start from scratch? Let’s throw caution to the winds and do something really big – even if it’s colossally stupid.
This is why the more outrageous Newt can be, the better his polls. The more irresponsible his bomb-throwing, the more attractive he becomes to a sizable portion of Americans so fed up they feel like throwing bombs.
History is full of strong men with dangerous ideas who gain power when large masses of people are so desperate and disillusioned they’ll follow anyone who offers big, seemingly easy solutions.
At times like this a nation must depend on its wise elders – people who have gained a reputation for good judgment and integrity, and who are broadly respected by all sides regardless of political affiliation or ideology – to call out the demagogues, speak the truth, and restore common sense.
The great tragedy of America today is the paucity of such individuals when we need them the most.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...




61 Comments so far
Show AllMarvbro59,
Oh, Thanks, and I'm on my knees saying this. I agree with you 200%. I really mean this!
All I can do is think of two instances when reading some, not all, but some of the comments. I think of a couple of apartments I lived at, the residents complained about the managers that did a pretty good job. The residents got those managers fired, and the newer managers were worse to the point we had to move. But, before we moved, those same people complaining were then wishing the old managers were still there. Then I look at what happened to Carter, Al Gore and Kerry, they received no support whatsoever, they were politically and publicly destroyed by the GOP, and what we got was worse. Again, this is how the GOP win just about every election. They complain about how bad their opponent is, only to be the worse one. I remember growing up, and guys would tell me that the guy I was dating was so bad (in reality, the guy I was dating wasn't) later, the guys badmouthing the guy I was dating apologized and admitted he'd wanted me for himself! I am a person that believes in treating people right, because if something shall ever happen to them, I will have no regrets by wishing I had treated them better when they were alive.
As far as Paul, I don't think he will ever make it to be pres. His biggest mistakes are not only ending the Fed but to take away the money that we give to Israel. All you have to do is look at what happened with former Ohio Congressman Jim Traficant - there's a youtube video of him on the house floor in 1994 saying the fed was broke and had some pretty disparaging remarks about Israel (this was a youtube video of him from C-Span in his quest to blast the Fed/Israel).
I agree. By the way kivals, I think you just came up with a new term for a coup d' etat and political assassination. To be JFK'd.
" To call out the demagogues, speak the truth and restore common sense ". May I ask you Mr. Reich, if you really mean that why in the hell are you still supporting Obama?
Give'm rope.
Read The Authoritarians by Bob Altemeyer - the book is free, not too long...
It's an excellent piece of work, consider it essential reading if want to make some sense of NG's seemingly irrational behaviour.
http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~altemey/
- "At times like this a nation must depend on its wise elders.." -
I suggest again that we draft for President and support Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), the only person to vote against giving Bush the keys to the kingdom in 2001.
Barbara Lee, the only person to vote against Public Law 107-40 which is the bane of our existence.
Wise elders? Hello? This woman voted against war. This woman could be the only true Peace candidate next year.
- the paucity of such individuals when we need them the most. -
This is just plain wrong. Barbara Lee is here. If you are too blind to see that, well, I blame the media for blinding you.
There are many older people who are walking the streets and sitting over coffee, discussing the terrifying things that are destroying the land in which they grew up. They are often filled with despair because no one will listen to them Why? They are not really political in the modern sense. They are honest and straightforward and they really would like to have their country live up to the ways that are now being dismantled. How about listening to them? Can we stand the honesty they will bring? Will we be able to stop grasping and start empathizing with those who are being left behind.? We have the elders. We could listen.
Could the term "unearned income" be positively more ironic?
When, oh when, will a term like this be purposed for the movement poperly?!
The American People are desperate for a President who will do something, anything....Sorry...Enter the "Citizen" in the manner of #OWS or suffer the fate of cataclysm as defined by Mr. Toynbee,,,The Elders are on the payroll of Corporate America. Everybody else has learned to steal...except for now... #OWS.
Did I just read kivals turn JFK into a verb, to wit:
"I agree, except that, as I stated above, I think the PTB would not need to JFK Paul. He would almost certainly accept the great compromise..."
Fascinating to me, because I've felt for many years that an underlying subliminal aspect of all major US politics is the threat of assassination BY the PTB, which theory would go far to explain the timorous crap that passes for political discourse these days. Interesting, too, that Ron Paul has received more MSM attention this year than probably in all his previous campaigns combined.
....... VERB: To be JFK'd.
........One could play with that acronym. Well done, kivals! Of course one can also be RFK'd or MLK'd. But the point is made: don't make trouble. This really is what Occupy Wall Street is all about. Leadership/change from above has been rendered impossible.
....... Unfortunately, The Revolution Will Not Be Twittered, because the PTB can shut down the repeater towers at will, and the ElectroMagnetic Spectrum that makes distant communication possible is VERY tightly controlled. (There have been a few local spontaneous "swarm" events using cell phones, but they were lessons for the PTB...)
...... Ultimately, it will require mass physical mobilization---people in the streets and barricades and adrenalin---to bring the change we need to this utterly corrupted nation. Mic Check! Mic Check. Can you hear me now?
-30-
"History is full of strong men with dangerous ideas who gain power when large masses of people are so desperate and disillusioned they’ll follow anyone who offers big, seemingly easy solutions."
Hmm?