Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
"By Imbeciles Who Really Mean It": Lost Verities and Dirty Hippies
Regardless of the dissembling of corporate state propagandists, free market capitalism has always been a government subsidized, bubble-inflating, swindlers' game, in which, psychopathic personalities (not “job creators” but con job perpetrators) thrive. By the exploitation of the many, a ruthless few have amassed large amounts of capital by which they dominate mainstream narratives and compromise elected and governmental officials, thereby gaming the system for their benefit.
Historically, the system has proven so demeaning to the majority of the population that the elite, from time to time, have, as a last resort, due to fear of a popular uprising, introduced a bit of socialism into the system, allowing a modicum of swag to funnel downward, and, as a result, the ranks of the middle class have been expanded. For a time, the bourgeoisie are bamboozled by the sales pitch that one day they will be affluent enough to be freed from the taxing obligations of a dismal, debt-beholden existence, when, in fact, they sowed their fate (like those swindled by opening their bank accounts after receiving email from parties claiming to be momentarily cash-strapped Nigerian royalty) by their own greed i.e. by their self-imprisonment within their own narrow, self-serving view of existence.
These stultifying circumstances will level an atmosphere of restiveness and nebulous rage. In general, the middle class can be counted on to detest the poor…blaming those born devoid of societal advantage and political influence for the impoverished circumstances that were in place long before the happenstance of their birth. Moreover, in a bit of noxious casuistry, as despicable as it is delusional, all too many members of the middle class have been induced by grift artists, employed by the ruling elite, to blame their own declining social status and attendant beleaguered existence on the poor.
photo: Gary Denham
"Be thine own palace, or the world's thy jail." --John Donne
This has proven to be an effective, time-tested grift: Because as long as the animus of the middle class remains fixated on the poor, the criminal cartels known as the economic elite can continue to ply their trade. Of course, in reality, by their greed and complicity, what the middle class has gained is this: trustee status in the capitalist workhouse.
Although, there is no need to fret: The run of neoliberal capitalism is about over. Don't mourn: This late stage, rapacious, mutant economic strain has leveled destruction on community and the planet itself as well as the hearts and souls of too many of those imprisoned within its paradigm.
At this point, the situation comes down to this: paradigm shift or perish.
The hour is amenable to reevaluate, reorganize and re-occupy. Doing so will prove helpful in withstanding false narratives.
Apropos: As of late, in my hours spent at Liberty Park, I've been witness to increasing numbers of tourists wandering in and repeating derisive, rightwing distortions regarding the OWS movement and its participants. For example, they are a collection of whiny college students who want taxpayers to be responsible for picking up the tab for their student loans because they are too lazy and spoiled to work off their debt. These tales are variations of the old canards involving welfare queens, mouths gleaming with taxpayer financed gold teeth, arriving at grocery stores lounging behind the steering wheels of late model Cadillacs, and proceeding to purchase steaks and fifths of gin with food stamps.
Ronald Reagan spoke of this mythical figure often, affording her near supernatural powers: She, through indolence, guile and a welfare state-bestowed sense of limitless entitlement, was the near singular cause of the nation's economic woes; her very existence, not only depleted the U.S. Treasury of dollars, but drained the U.S. free enterprise system of vitality and the very will to compete. She was a succubus who arrived in the socialist haunted night to feed on and zap the very virility of capitalism.
Because of the wealth inequities inherent to capitalism, in order to prevent social unrest, the system is reliant on creating false narratives that foster misplaced and displaced class resentment. These tales are very potent, because they serve as palliatives for the enervating states of shame inflicted on the population at large by their enslavement to the free market. Accordingly, because the vast majority of the populace are deemed "losers", due to how the system is rigged, techniques must be created and maintained to displace the rage, borne of a sense of powerlessness, that grips the system's exploited underlings.
OWS is beginning to change the narrative…align it with reality--and that is an alarming development for the 1%; hence, the retooled, amped up propaganda campaign we're seeing signs of at present.
This is the reality the 1% endeavor to obscure: Capitalism is a pyramid scheme; by its very structure, only a few will ever receive its bounty…that is wrung out of the exhausted hides of the vast majority. Fact is, capitalism, the neoliberal variety or otherwise, has never worked as promised; its innate structure ensures exploitation and inequity. Therefore, time and time again, adding aspects of socialism (e.g., New Deal era programs and reforms) have saved capitalism from itself. But, after a time, the plutocrats regroup and begin anew to launch a big money-financed, slow motion coup d’état of government (e.g., the Reagan Revolution).
A vast disparity of wealth within a nation will all but ensure this societal trajectory. But that isn't going to happen, this time. The planet cannot endure the assaults wrought by a system that requires exponential growth to be maintained. The run of capitalism is nearly over. A more sustainable economic system, based on horizontal rule, is being developed, globally (e.g., the Icelandic model).
The vertical structure inherent to capitalism brings about the self-perpetuating reign of an insular elite who choose to go the route of empire and, by doing so, overreach and bring themselves down, but only after much unnecessary suffering, exploitation and death--the calling card and ground level criteria of imperium.
Yet, often within a declining empire, even as the quality of life grows increasingly degraded for the majority of the populace, questioning sacrosanct beliefs, such as, the myth that capitalism promotes societal progress and personal advancement, by means of the possibility of upward class migration, proves to be a difficult endeavor for many. The reason: Even given the degraded nature of life as lived under late capitalism, the act of taking stock of one's situation--beginning to question how one arrived at one's present station in life--will engender anxiety, anger and regret.
Apropos to the shame based Calvinism of the capitalist state: If I was duped in a rigged game, what does that say about me? The narrative of capitalism insists that if I work hard, applying savvy and diligence, at fulfilling my aspirations then I would, at some point, arrive in the rarified realm of life's winners.
But if success proves elusive, then my flawed character must be the problem--not the dishonest economic setup--and miasmic shame descends upon me. Yet I can count on rightwing media to provide the type of provisional solace proffered by demagogues i.e., imparting the reason that folks like me can't get ahead is because scheming socialists have hijacked my parcel of the American Dream and delivered it to the undeserving thereby transforming my shame into displaced outrage.
And that must be the case; otherwise, it would behoove me to make the painful admission that I have been conned…have co-signed the crimes committed against me. Worse, I would be compelled to question all my verities and beliefs--all the convictions I clutch, regarding, not only the notions that I possess about myself and the methods I’ve adopted in approaching life, but also, the social structure that influenced my character.
Imagine: If you had to re-imagine your life. Imagine, how the act would unnerve your loved ones, threaten friendships, even endanger your livelihood.
What an unnerving task that would prove to be…an ordeal certain to deliver heart-shaking anxiety, devastating regret and nettling dread directly into the besieged sanctuary of what is suppose to be the inviolable precincts of my comfort zone.
“At any street corner the feeling of absurdity can strike any man in the face.” --Albert Camus
Accordingly, I might turn to Fox News and other well-rewarded, professional dissemblers of the political right, imploring them to dissolve my doubts and dread. To escort and ensconce my troubled form back into my comfort zone by telling me the problem is not the iron boot of the corporate state upon my neck; rather, my oppression stems from the barefoot hippie lefties of OWS "who need a bath and a job"; it is their odious presence in our lives that has subdued my happy capitalist destiny by the pernicious act of laying down an effluvia (more demobilizing than pepper spray) of patchouli musk and has caused capitalism itself to weaken into an enervated swoon.
Yes, this has to be the case: The cause of my oppression. Those America-hating Occupy Wall Street hippies are actually the hidden hand that controls the global order and who possess a craven desire to smelt down the gleaming steel of the humming engines of U.S. capitalism into creepy, Burning Man statuary, who want to hold 24/7 Nuremberg-style rallies in the form of annoying drum circles.
In reality, it is those dirty hippies who are actually "The Man." Withal, hippies crashed the global economy and pinned the blame on the selfless souls who ply their benign trade on Wall Street.
Now, you know why conservatives harbor such animus towards hippies. Don't claim that Fox News et al--those selfless souls--who only desire to protect the glories of the present order, and who only have your best interest in mind, didn't try to warn you.
"I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it." --Mark Twain
- Posted in


168 Comments so far
Show AllTell me why I shouldn't write in Bernie Sanders for President?
Sounds like one of the most sane proposals I've heard lately given the official choices we have. I was looking for an alternative to holding my nose and voting for someone I clearly didn't want to vote for.
Because he compromised his morals and voted for Obama's Mandated Junk Health Insurance bill (and hasn't apologized for doing so).
Former Salt Lake City mayor and civil rights attorney Rocky Anderson is the more viable choice. He's going to run as an independent and look at the people with whom he been meeting:
"Others involved in the discussions include Margaret Flowers, a doctor and leading proponent of a single-payer health plan; Kevin Zeese, an organizer of the Occupy D.C. movement; and former U.S. Rep. John Anderson, who ran for president as an independent in 1980."
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/mobile/53014248-90/anderson-ballot-former-hall.html.csp
I've mostly taken the line that the Obamacare plan, largely written by the insurance and pharmaceutical industries, does little more than mandate that we buy lame private insurance. I recently came across this different view: http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2011/12/02/the-bomb-buried-in-obamacare-explodes-today-halleluja/. I'd be interested in hearing people's thoughts.
Interesting link, Dreamer.
If "this is the day seismic shifts in our health care system finally get under way", and we all find out that Obama's deeper thinking has put us "now on an inescapable path to a single-payer system for most Americans", I would certainly be pleasantly surprised.
But unless were talking months, rather than years, to get to a single payer system, Obama's cleverness will only keep the corporate welfare tap flowing to the 1%.
They've already taken way more than their fair share.
Medicare spends 98% on care and 2% on maintenance. Single payer is the best way to provide health care. Obama care isn't a path to single payer at all. The health insurance industry will get millions of brand new customers with the Obama/corporate plan and that in itself will offset any losses the ratio inflicts, plus, they can simply increase premiums. Why would the health insurance industry write a bill that would cause their eventual obsolescence? duh.
""I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it." --Mark Twain" (thanks gardennorcarl)
Insurance companies make their money on investing what they collect in premiums.
It looks as if the private health insurers will either have to raise premiums or become even more vigorous about denying claims. I believe that either course is open to them in the new law.
The reason I think they can do these things is that the writing of the law in a Senate committee was supervised by by a woman who formerly worked for Wellpoint. It is hard to believe that she would leave that "bomb" in there without a way to avoid its consequences.
Thanks for the article, Dreamer55.
No wonder the repubs want to repeal it first chance they get for more reasons than they just hate everything about Obama.
Corporations screw up often and usually it is the short term profit that does it but then they just switch to some other thing to screw up in their short term interest.
Go to this response to the article from another Forbes writer -
What Bomb Buried in Obamacare?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2011/12/03/what-bomb-buried-in-obamacare/
Rick Ungar's argument is utterly demolished. It is so off base, that the only logical explanation for it is that the author is writing a propaganda piece promoting Obama.
As Tim Worstall points out, it is not unusual for insurance companies to pay out 100% or more of the customers' premiums, let alone only 80%. That is not where they make their money. They make their money by investing all of those dollars they collect on premiums between the time they receive the premiums and have to make a pay out.
It is going to be an insane campaign season, and we have 11 months of this to go yet. I have never seen such blatant and pervasive lying. Can we call it "lying" yet, or do we still have to use euphemisms?
With the billions of dollars flying around the campaigns, and with no limits on what can be spent or by whom, I think it would be the height of naivete were we to doubt that a lot of that moolah is probably being spread around among journalists, opinion piece writers, and bloggers.
Sounds promising!
ltown.......i've got an idea, why don't you just shoot yourself in the foot!?.......................so, who would YOU vote in?
Thanks for the link.
I hope Rocky Anderson gets heard a lot and It would be great if he was included in debates coming up.
Rockstroh, the people's voice. Thank you, Phil.
I'm writing in Phil Rockstroh's name.
Phil, more disciplined writing and brevity, puleeeeese! Other than that, it's all good.
______________________________________________
Looking to Washington for solutions is like looking to Fox for news.
"This is the reality the 1% endeavor to obscure: Capitalism is a pyramid scheme; by its very structure, only a few will ever receive its bounty…that is wrung out of the exhausted hides of the vast majority."
It's important to understand, though, that "the 1%" forged new "class" alliances during the era of "Neoliberal Capitalism" which replaced the previous "class" alliances of "Keynesian-Warfare-Welfare Capitalism." In no case has "the 1%" ruled in the complete absence of "class" alliances.
During the neoliberal era, the top 20-25% (approximately) of wealth accumulators--the managerial, high-tech, professional and associated "classes"--have done quite well, and thus have lent neo-liberalism and the rule of "the 1%" their support.
Gérard Duménil and Dominique Lévy, "Neoliberal Income Trends: Wealth, Class and Ownership in the USA":
"The second major beneficiary of the gradual dissolution of the Keynesian compromise in the us has been the layer of ‘upper-salaried classes’. Although the required information is not all available, one can surmise that this comprises a social group falling roughly within the 85–98 fractile, with an annual income between $75,000 and $200,000, basically composed of wages before the age of 65, and pension income after. The salaries of this layer, as we have seen, have grown comparatively faster than those of less well-off sectors of the population since the 1950s, a trend that neoliberalism has done nothing to interrupt.
Secondly, although the upper-salaried classes have benefited from increased returns on financial investment only to a limited extent—approximately 5 per cent of their total income—while still economically active, the extension of pension funds has been a crucial mechanism in establishing a link between this layer and the capitalist elite, associating them with an interest in the restoration of capital income and the rise of capital gains. In this context, the development of pension funds appears as a key component in forging a broader class alliance in favour of neoliberal restructuring, since these upper-salaried classes do not live from capital income or gains while economically active.
Finally, it is precisely this upper-salaried layer that has played the most central role in the shift towards rising consumption and declining saving trends in the us during the neoliberal era. As Alan Greenspan acknowledged in his January 20, 1999, testimony: ‘We have some evidence from recent years that all or most of the decline in the saving rate is accounted for by the upper-income quintile where the capital gains have disproportionately accrued, which suggests that the wealth effect has been real and significant’.... This rush to consumption has certainly been a major component in the adherence of these classes to the neoliberal social order."
This is European history, actually American history is different. There was something here before feudalism and it was akin to Natural Law.(No, not the law of the jungle as some would have you believe) The process of Americanism was to indenture all things including nature. It is so obvious, it is written throughout history, and basically is why native people were exterminated and their land stolen.(native people now include a larger group)
Because doing that brings nothing but self satisfaction. Vote Green and help build a future.
All this statement of yours does is make clear your lack of knowledge about Socialism.
You're confusing socialism and totalitariansim.
We know what's happenning with the banksters in charge.
Lets see if we can put some People in charge!
And try not to be too afraid of the impending revolution! Universal healthcare, education and affordable housing aren't all bad you know.
""I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it." --Mark Twain"
Definitely the latter. What more proof do we need. None of them saw the 2008 crash coming. And they think Goldman Sachs alumni can solve the problems Goldman Sachs created while declaring the same institutions that created the problem "too big to fail". Can't make this crap up.
I think that we have reached the point where Twain's quote should read:
"The world is being run by imbeciles who are putting us on, along with other imbeciles who really mean it."
Exactly! I had the same thought.
Websters defines imbecile as "a very stupid or foolish person".
As long as you folks continue to delude yourselves into thinking that the 1% are stupid and made mistakes, you will continue to enable the 1% to continue to transfer all of the 99%'s wealth into the hands of the 1%.
The 1% are smart, devious and continue to fool enough of the 99% enough of the time to continue their oppression. Telling us that neither they or anybody else "could see it coming" gives them an excuse to get ever larger bailouts funded by the 99%. It never mattered if they "could see it coming" because they hedged their bets by buying politicians who will continue to use every last taxpayer dollar and then some to bail the 1% out no matter how much they lost.
raydelcamino: I agree with your post! It's like not recognizing the fact that Obama met with CEOs of health insurance companies, hospitals, Big PhRMA, etc., behind the scenes and made quite a number of lucrative backdoor deals for the big moneymen. SIngle-payer was NEVER on the table! A public option was NEVER seriously considered by those in power -- Democrats and Republicans.
"It never mattered if they "could see it coming" because they hedged their bets by buying politicians who will continue to use every last taxpayer dollar and then some to bail the 1% out no matter how much they lost." raydelcamino
I agree with your statement!
And, don't forget -- some of the big moneymen, a number of the hedge fund operators, made out like bandits by betting against "we the people," and they were so pleased to do so! The bottom line is all that matters. People, human beings, be damned!!
They are sociopaths and psychopaths, but they are NOT stupid!
Kay,
I'm not surprised to discover how closely we're resonating on this issue, as the truth will out.
I see this as a interesting aspect of humankind's budding synchronicity, and perhaps as a prophetic omen of ever growing connections between each other and our shared collective unconsciousnesses. I feel that this is a very good thing.
Yesterday, on Dean Baker's article -- I said this about so called bankster "incompetency" :
"They may be amoral heinous psychopaths, but they surely are NOT stupid."
In retrospect, I like your version for not pulling any punches about why they're so relentless, as I sometimes wish to avoid conveying the harshest truth to folks -- all at once -- to see the world as starkly as I do at times.
The medicine is so bitter, to better awaken us from our slumber.
Thank you for your perseverance and insights.
Enough of 'American dreaming,' as it's high time for 'American awakening.'
I cannot speak for NC-Tom, but of course I recognize that there are very smart and capable fascist elites involved in the propaganda as well as the grand theft (I suspect that NC-Tom does as well). I have expressed that myself many times in CD comments.
But I do not believe that the smart fascist elites are nearly as smart as they think they are or as smart as they would need to be to achieve what would appear to be their goals. First off, they seem to be engaging in a foolish gamble. They are risking the survival of their own kids and all their other descendants as well the civilization itself (they risk the ill effects of climate chaos as well as those of social instability) on the long-shot that they can monopolize the resources and master propaganda techniques to the point that they can keep 99 percent of the population down long enough for them to either accept their impoverishment and virtual enslavement or die. As they take this gamble, they are giving up the high probability of survival with a high quality of life that they could be virtually assured of through adopting policies leading to a smooth transition to a more egalitarian and harmonious society and healthy environment. Beyond that, they are ensuring that they will live more stressful and thus less healthy lives by taking these aggressive, risky actions. They are focusing on the narrow and the short-term rather than the broad and the long-term and that is both foolish and stupid.
So, even though I will agree that they are smart, I do believe insults regarding their intellectual abilities are appropriate and to some degree accurate. And I might add that a good part of the intellectual deficit could be due to what Upton Sinclair was referring to when he said: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it."
They're not stupid but they are fools (see Websters definition referenced above, "very stupid or foolish people"). Although very clever about gaming the system to their own benefit, the 1% are generally blind to their complicity in destroying the environment, which will ultimately bring them down along with everyone else. Kivals elaborates this more. I believe it is really only a very small elite, closer to .01%, who are the biggest fools.
"The 1% are smart, devious and continue to fool enough of the 99% enough of the time to continue their oppression."
"The 1%" are supported by the top 20% or so below them--who are hardlly "oppressed" given their high incomes and wealth.
The notion that "the 1%" are oppressing "the 99%" no doubt makes for effective political slogans and motivational speeches, but is simply false from an empirical viewpoint and can lead to misguided road maps for change.
See my post above for details.
When you realize how long the ruling classes have kept the masses down by pitting them against each other with false, baseless allegations; and at the same time stealing their wealth and labor--isn't it us who are the fools and imbeciles?
That is the only conclusion to be drawn if we apply deductive logic ?
If the ruling imbeciles did not have the cooperation of the army and law enforcement, their imbecility would be unveiled and recognized for what it is. My dream is that our troops just come home on their own volition. It's always sweet too when the police refuse to do what their masters order. Hopefully the exponential factor will kick in soon.
I would say that systems of propaganda and socialization geared to the "manufacture of consent" play a greater role than the military and law enforcement in keeping the true nature of the ruling elites veiled. Of course, if those consent-producing systems fail, the ruling elite will undoubtedly resort to physical repression and terror to maintain the social order.
Good one! I gotta use this quote a lot. Thx.
Not to mention that Goldman Sachs proposes to solve the problems they created by getting the European Union (of Banksters) to appoint two Goldman Sachs honchos to head the governments of Italy and Greece (Mario "Three-Card" Monti and Lucas Papademos, respectively) without consulting those populations on the matter. Indeed you can't make this stuff up.
Installing banksters on the thrones of Greece, Italy and a few other nations before years end doesn't sound like the behavior of imbeciles. It sounds like one of many milestones in a well orchestrated wealth transfer scheme.
The "two big to fail" must include the illegal drug cartels. It was their depositing of $400 billion in 2007 into Wachovia to stave off the the economic collapse of the banksters until 2008 when the government took over funding the of the criminal banksters and their COUNTERFEIT INTEREST BEARING DEBT funded by the forced contributions, withholding taxes, collected by the government and transferred to the banksters which use the FORCED CONTRIBUTIONS for $billion bonuses.
Since the right is bringing back 40YO insults (Hippy! Commie!), perhaps it's time to look at what an actual Yippie had to say when the RNC started it all...
http://www.semantikon.com/StealThisBookbyAbbieHoffman.pdf
Yippie! Overthrow!
Marx said: "that capitalism will have it's day, but in the end it would fall at the feet of socialism."
May "financial capitalism" end up where it belongs, in dust bin of mens follies..
Well said, thanks for laying it out.
An enjoyable read, from the first word on. When I read "the dissembling of corporate state propagandists" in the first sentence, what immediately came to mind was how those propagandists have convinced the majority of the US population that "freedom" means control of the political system by business elites, while a system, a state, or a population is "unfree" when there is a lack of control by business elites.
When corporations and/or politicians speak of freedom they are referring to the freedom to consume whatever the corporations supply for USAn's to buy. That's their definition of freedom, it has nothing to do with political, religious or Constitutional freedoms.
The sentences in this article which seemed the most important reflection of my experiences, especially since the rise of the Obama show was this,
"Imagine: if you had to re-imagine your life. Imagine how the act would un-nerve your loved ones, threaten friendships, even endanger your livelihood."
The majority of people who I do believe really care about me have expressed (on repeated occasions) intolerance toward my criticisms and even the expression of doubts about Obama and the democrats. They have gone so far as to offer (which I declined) to have gatherings where political discussions are forbidden in order to "socialize" with me. These are people whose openness is usually very progressive, but to challenge their NEED to believe in the democrats is to go Too far.
Living in a "conservative" community, I know these liberal friends are constantly feeling as if they are fighting an uphill battle, but they refuse to see their own complicity in their support of a corporate-owned party.
In my somewhat wild garden (which is also offensive to some of my neighbors), I take solace and let the garden be a messenger to me and from me.
I do not want to be "the man", but if I am, then I will try to speak gardenese.
Interesting comment, bird. I find myself in a very similar situation, being repeatedly "censored" on social occasions for bringing up "unpleasant" subjects and "extreme" views. Still, we must persist, for when the doodoo truly hits the fan, it will be too late, and there will be no satisfaction in having been right.
"clovis"
I am not taking any "satisfaction" from any of this. Quite the opposite.
I have yet to find a way to open other people's eyes without feeling as if I am being abusive in some way. The reason I comment here is largely because of the hopelessness I feel in my daily life.
If anything, the only hope I have is that my sense of hopelessness may somehow be proven wrong.
I didn't mean to say that there was any satisfaction in being "right," quite the opposite. I do wish our sense of ongoing and imminent disaster were wrong. What I meant to say is that these people who feel so upset when we express our perceptions will only be convinced after it's too late. And at that point, there will be no satisfaction at all in having perceived reality correctly.
Most Obama supporters that I know felt like the 2008 election was the last chance of saving the US and most will never admit that Obama is a trojan horse because they would become too depressed knowing there are no more chances. They are too indoctrinated into the two party system to believe that third party candidates are anything more than obstructionists, and they view OWS as a square peg in a round hole.
The closest I ever get to discussing Obama is saying things like "the US healthcare system delayed my retirement by 10 years, and now Obamacare will delay it by 15 years", or "comparing Obama to Nixon, I find Nixon further to the left". With these statements, it quickly becomes apparent that I have already pushed the boundary.
Clovis & Bird Brain: What you describe happens to me, too, and a male friend who writes to me from California. The way I see it is that some people have awakened, sort of unplugged from The Matrix machine world that does their thinking for them. The rest prefer (so far) to remain asleep. Some people argue for their illusions (necessary illusions, so they think) and trying to pry them loose is dangerous. Nonetheless, between both parties serving elite interests by cutting into Social Security and Medicare, this, after reducing home values and reducing bank interest rates to less than 1%, as food prices rise and wages fall... added to the stupendous array of earth changes underway GUARANTEES that many more will soon be forced to wake up. In a sense, those of us who already SEE through the morass have crossed the cogitive Rubicon and will be in positions to help the newcomers onto the emerging cerebral turf that constitutes the Next Promised Land, ecologically compromised though it may be.
PHIL: As always, amazing grace inspires your prose (and the vision behind it).