Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Will the 1% Steal Ohio's Labor Rights Referendum?
Tuesday’s most important vote is the repeal of Ohio’s vicious anti-labor Issue 2.
Polls show the repeal winning by 20% or more. But will it---like the 2004 presidential election---be stolen by a 1% intent on crushing working people and stealing huge sums of money?
Like Wisconsin’s millionaire assault on the bargaining rights of public unions, the thoroughly bought Ohio legislature has passed a draconian law aimed at crippling the organizing ability of working people.
The attack has the loud, persistent support of Wall Street’s hand-picked Governor John Kasich, who made millions as a Foxist commentator and Lehman bond dealer. Among other things, Kasich helped pawn $400 million in Lehman’s junk bonds onto the Ohio teacher’s pension fund, making him a multi-millionaire. Control of that money would be directly affected by the outcome of this referendum.
The legislature’s original passage of the anti-labor bill drew thousands of demonstrators to the statehouse lawn and key locations throughout the Buckeye State. The pre-occupy rallies got ardent support from progressive, union and working people across Ohio’s political spectrum.
But the vast, apparently virtually limitless resources of corporate America have been polluting the Ohio media, distorting the nature of the vote, aiming to thoroughly confuse the voters, who must vote no on this issue to defeat the bill. Since corporations are now considered “people,” with no real limits on what can be spent, the corporate anti-labor deluge has been horrific.
But that’s only the beginning. In 2004, the Ohio’s GOP control of the governorship and Secretary of State’s office made possible the theft of the presidency for George W. Bush. Though highly sophisticated exit polls showed John Kerry winning the state by more than 4%, the “official” outcome had him losing Ohio’s 20 electoral votes---and thus the White House---by more than 2%.
By all credible estimates such a shift of more than 6% was a statistical impossibility. It was primarily engineered by Bush consigliere Karl Rove and Republican Secretary of J. Kenneth Blackwell.
Rove and Blackwell helped knock a half-million or more primarily Democratic voters were off Ohio's registration rolls prior to election day. Despite the obvious irregularities that defined the registration process, voting procedures, ballot tabulations and final electronic manipulations, John Kerry conceded Ohio---and the election---with more than 200,000 votes left uncounted.
In July of this year, www.freepress.org posted the architectural maps used in Blackwell’s 2004 voting operation in Ohio. His electronic reporting operation was designed by a partisan Republican firm, GovTech and linked directly to servers at the premier Republican and right-wing tech company SmarTech in Chattanooga, Tennessee.
In the 2005 election, a corporate coalition parallel to the one fighting to crush worker rights this year worked on a comparable Issue 2. In reaction to the theft of the vote in 2004, a popular uprising had designed that Issue 2 to make it easier for Ohioans to vote early by mail or in person.
Two days before the 2005 vote, the Republican-leaning Columbus Dispatch poll showed that Issue 2 passing by 26 points, 59% to 33%.
But, on that November 8 (the same day as this year’s vote), Blackwell oversaw the defeat of Issue 2 with the utterly implausible support of 63.5%. Once again, the shift from pre-election polling to final “official” vote count was a virtual statistical impossibility.
For Blackwell’s official vote tally to square with the pre-election Dispatch poll, there would have to have been an unprecedented 22% shift in the last days of the election cycle. Given the ability of the Ohio Secretary of State to easily manipulate voter registration and ballot counting, American democracy was severely crippled in that 2005 outcome, a defeat that may again come into play this Tuesday. (See http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2005/1559 )
This time around, the Republican-dominated Ohio legislature has already attempted to disenfranchise 900,000 Ohio voters---nearly 20% of the overall electorate. The vast majority of these newly disenfranchised citizens come from demographics indicating they are progressive voters who would vote to defeat Issue 2. Republican efforts came through HB 194, designed to make it difficult for the elderly, disabled, poor, and students to vote. Thankfully, a separate petition drive has temporarily blocked this latest reincarnaton of Jim Crow in the north.
But the GOP did kill early voting on the weekend before the election. This hugely successful expansion of the effective franchise had allowed tens of thousands of Ohioans to vote at public locations the Saturday and Sunday prior to the 2008 presidential election. This “excess of democracy” proved too much for the 1%, which got rid of it this year on the back of one of the legislature’s many anti-voter rights bills.
Greg Moore, head of the NAACP’s voting rights campaign, has said on Bob Fitrakis’s FIGHT BACK radio show (www.talktainmentradio.com) that Ohio’s Issue 2 may be the most important vote in the entire US this year. He also points out that in 2004 the right wing used a vote against gay marriage to attract conservative voters to the polls. This year the Republicans have put a symbolic anti-Obamacare Issue 3 on the ballot to draw out the same reactionary elements.
But the polling indicates that many of those who hate Obamacare also happen to be public employees, or friends and family of public employees – the targets of Issue 2.
Why is passing Issue 2 so important to these Republicans? If it passes, it will destroy the power of the public employee unions in the state. These unions remain the last base of money in Ohio politics for moderate, liberal and progressive candidates. The 1% has already been successful in destroying grassroots organizations that registered lower income voter, like ACORN.
Also, the pension funds the targeted unions protect contain hundreds of billions of dollars in workers assets. Defanged unions would be easy prey for the likes of Kasich, the former Lehman Brothers Uber-Vulture who got rich with the sale of over $400 million of junk assets to the teacher’s pension before becoming governor.
Essentially the weakened unions could lose control of the pension boards and the looting would begin anew.
Thus, even though the forces of democracy and unionization seem to have a substantial lead going into Tuesday’s vote, no electoral tally in Ohio is a safe bet. The theft of the presidency in 2004, and the huge reversal of the pro-democracy margin for Issue 2 in 2005---more than 20%---should remind us all that where billions of dollars and the rights of working people are concerned, the 1% will stop at nothing to steal an election.
It has been done repeatedly in Ohio. It could be done again on Tuesday. Let’s do all in our power to make sure Buckeye history does not repeat itself as both tragedy and farce.
This article was first published at freepress.org.
- Posted in



20 Comments so far
Show AllHow can it be considered stealing, when we all know they pay their agents for it through lobbying and campaign contributions? The Supreme Court put everything up for sale. Didn't it?
For the past 30 years Kasich's financial industry paid politicians to decriminalize (euphemistically called deregulation) financial fraud, hence of the industry's "stealing" mentioned by the authors is legal stealing.
Doesn't the Diabolical (euphemistically called Diebold) voting machine manufacturer rig the machines in Ohio ?
The bastard that the Supreme Court gave birth to will use his Uncle Wall Street to buy his laws and protections from those supposed to represent the we of the we the people. Democracy and Capitalism can't exist together so you know which one will be eliminated. In any way possible.
Hoa binh
Of course they will steal it, or buy it, or a combination of the two. Why do intelligent people like Waserman continue to support this farcical electoral system? Talk about a cognitive disconnect. The article admits the system is rigged. Yet Wasserman and other so-called Progressives can't wait to facilitate it with their participation.
Cast a real vote by refusing to endorse these charades. Support Occupy Wall Street until it grows large enough. Then we will occupy Congress and arrest these rackateers and put them on trial. Voting makes a mockery of justice.
I disagree, jmowrey. Not all elections are stolen, and voting still has the power to sway things, particularly at the statewide and local levels. Not to vote on principle only gives more power to the ignoramuses on the right who always vote.
Voting in the US is only a mockery because the 1% have captured the electoral system.
Voting is essential to democracy. Fight back! Take back the vote counting from the corporations! Fight for public campaign financing.
Just voting is not nearly enough, but not voting, by itself, is no revolutionary proposition. It's merely surrender without a fight.
One of the most interesting aspects of these attacks on collective bargaining, pensions, and other state unions rights is that we are told to focus on the blatant corruption of the republican governors in Wisconsin and Ohio, but we are not told about the attacks by the democrat governor, democrat senate, and democrat general assembly in Illinois.
In Illinois, the democrats aren't bothering to promote laws and referendums in order to attack the state's unions. They just do it in the budget.
In addition to attacking collective bargaining and trying to reduce pension benefits/payment proportions, the governor has cancelled pay raises (2% raises were still too much), reduced medicaid payments to hospitals, and cut funding for school transportation.
Meanwhile, Illinois legislators have the 5th highest base pay of all the legislators in the country.
In May, they tried to get a 14% increase for some committee members and then later, they decided that they would take one work day off unpaid as a way of "reducing" their salaries.
So, yes republicans are nasty and corrupt, but the democrats are deceptive and corrupt.
Voting for either of them is corruption.
Birdbrain, You're absolutely right, D's and R's are both corrupt. What happened here in Ohio was disastrous for the whole nation. And it couldn't have happened without the cowardice and capitulation of the D's as well as the criminal manipulation of the R's.
It's not noted here, but Bob Fitrakis is also the co-chair of the Green Party Ohio, and has run for numerous offices as a Green and worked on lawsuits to help Minor Parties get ballot access.
The Republican legislature here has passed a totally regressive voter's rights bill (which will now be considered by the citizens as a referendum in 2012) in which Minor parties were again subjected to regulations which had been declared unconstitutional in 2006.
Although the legislature seems unable to understand court decisions, lawyers in the Ohio Secretary of State's office apparently can, and that office issued a directive just a few days ago to allow four minor parties continued ballot access (Green, Libertarian, Constitution, Socialist) and to add one more ( the American Elect Party).
For those of us in Ohio who believe as you say, that voting for members of either the D or R's is corrupt, there are now five minor parties that you can support. Moreover, people are needed to run for office or become support staff for candidates. Even if you voted in another party's primary in the past two years, by declaring yourself a candidate as a Green (or other minor party) your party affiliation will change.
It's time for people to take back our government from corrupt politicians. Just one more thing: the Green party does not accept corporate campaign contributions; individual contributions only.
Political support for parties outside of the two-party system is one of the ways forward, and historically has been a vital factor in realizing progressive initiatives. The Dem/Repub good cop/bad cop structure is ingrained and internalized such that it is very difficult to overcome. The oligarchy always wins with the binary partisan system, which structurally limits debate and real options. The Democrats spent more time, money and energy attacking the political rights of third parties in 2004 than they did in exposing the various voter fraud and election manipulations - which were done on a coordinated massive scale (see Greg Palast "Armed Madhouse"). The two major parties seemed to have colluded in the ascension of Bush in 2000 and 2004, against the wishes of the majority of the electorate, and in ten short years the triumph of the corporatocracy - which was a possibility a decade ago but not a certainty - has been cemented into the body politic, with the attendant corruption, militarism, austerity, and general nastiness.
the writers ask: could a few rich guys, having bought the politicians, get what they want to the detriment of the working people
geez.... i don't know
let me ask them a question: does a bear shit in the woods?
Will one per cent steal? Hey, not unless they can get away with it-- being the "devout" cynics and hypocrites they are.
Will the one per cent steal? Hey, not unless they can get away with it-- being the "devout" cynics and hypocrites they are.
Yes they do, I stepped in it before when Hiking in the woods.
this is a true tragedy. of course, elections have been stolen forever. 1800, 1824, 1876, 1888, most importantly 1896, etc etc.
but we have the power to stop it. first we must ackowledge the reality, with the Ds and corp media won't do. then we need to win. and we can!!!
Right on, but we cannot facilitate the denial surrounding voting fraud. Every time voting is discussed, the corruption of the process must be highlighted.
That corruption involves electronic ballot counting fraud, campaign finance that alows the 1% to determine who the candidates are, and the two party duoploy that freezes out real alternatives. If these pints are not made, every time, then the 1% generated illusion of fair elections is strengthened.
Voting is not nearly enough, nor is encouraging people to vote.
i'll have a pint!
Money can only rule in representative government
Direct democracy
It was an interesting article, but it would have been more informative if the authors had given us the wording of the law that the Ohio voters will voting on.
See:
Ohio Senate Bill 5 Veto Referendum, Issue 2 (2011)*
* http://tinyurl.com/cvpvr2x
Ohio State Senate Bill 5, the "Collective Bargaining Bill" (2011)**
** http://tinyurl.com/4p3bqx7
Where have we seen Kasich before? Oh yes it was the far right faux news channel, lies, excuse me, untruths, created by the one percent. If the OWS movement isn't democrat or republican why are the republicans calling it a mob while calling the tea party true patriots? Why is faux news making accusations that OWS is violent? Why are the cops acting like the OWS are sub human? Why are the far right people taking our collective voices away?