EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Local Money Creates Wealth Outside the Bubble
Ever since the crash several years ago, Americans have felt precarious about the nation's economy and the value of its currency. Money seems to take inconceivable, abstract, and even magical forms, traveling around the world at lightening speed with little oversight and obvious mismanagement.
(Image by opensourceway)
We have little control over it — the value of our currency is tied to conditions well beyond our control. It moves in directions that most of us are vehemently opposed to. We trusted that the banks, Congress, the Federal Reserve, corporations and Wall Street are managing money responsibly on our behalf, particularly with retirement funds and mortgages, but lately that trust has been broken. In response, local currencies have drawn interest from Occupy and other economic resistance groups to create an alternative to state-controlled money.
Since the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 there has been a relative monopoly on money issuance by private banks through the Federal Reserve, which has drawn criticism from groups like the Monetary Reform Institute. For most of America's history, citizens used local currencies to meet their needs through local business, which often produced their own money. Before the Civil War, there were thousands of local currencies, and during the Great Depression they made a comeback, with hundreds of currencies used by the unemployed in particular.
Local currencies generally develop for one of two reasons — the desire for local economic control (for a variety of reasons, from democracy to sustainability to social justice,) and a scarcity of national currency. In the current situation, both reasons weigh heavy.
When designed well and appropriately for the specific context, local currencies can boost a local economy and reward important work that needs to be done. Where national currency is not available because of overall scarcity or there is not enough market value for the work, local currencies can create real, tangible wealth we can see and control. Investing in community currency means investing in your community's health for the long haul, and therefore your own security and happiness.
When money is spent in chain stores, national currency leaks out of the local economy electronically to their headquarters elsewhere. Community currencies prevent this leakage of resources and energy to entities beyond our control and recirculate local wealth through the multiplier effect an average of three times more wealth (45 cents on the dollar for local currencies compared to 15 cents on the dollar for federal currency recirculating). They support local business by providing more loyal customers, increasing local employment and buffering them from the shock of a boom-bust economy. While currency experts are working on interchangeable currency platforms on an international scale, alternative currencies function as complements to support the local economy, not competitors with the national currency, which is currently more ubiquitously useful.
While the economy remains in recession, poverty rises, and local businesses shut down, social innovators and social service organizations are inventing new kinds of currencies all over the world. Here are some of the most exciting examples:
In the tiny country of Switzerland, the WIR Bank is a nationally circulated complementary currency by a cooperative of Swiss small- and medium-sized businesses that issue credit to each other based on rating and collateral. With over 60,000 member businesses, WIR currency circulates the equivalent of 1.65 billion Francs annually, helping small business get off the ground or expand, and allowing them to compete with international businesses and make it through tough times. It provides loans when national currency has dried up. GETS is a similar mutual credit B2B currency, with much more versatility, coming out of the UK and spreading to business networks in the US, like Green America and Vermont Businesses for Social Responsibility.
Across Europe and Africa, thousands of LETS (Local Employment Trading Systems) like Community Exchange Systems and Community Forge provide local businesses, the self-employed, the underemployed, the creatively employed, and many radical idealists with a digital currency to organize and lubricate the informal economy. LETS are similar to commercial bartering systems, but use complementary currencies in an almost immeasurable variance of forms and structures, designed and controlled by the local community to meet its needs without money. LETS often consist of an online directory of goods and services offered by individual members and businesses and an accounting system. LETS credits are more abundant form or currency as a member can earn as many credits as they have time to work for, rather than waiting for scarce dollars to be available from bank accounts. Greeks in the midst of economic crisis have adopted a LETS currency called TEM, which has a Craigslist like directory and a digital and check-like currency form.
One specific and popular variance of LETS in the US and UK is called a Timebank. Timebanks have special qualities that make them particularly useful to the poor and underprivileged. They value everyone's hours equally, intentionally fund community service and development work that it often unfundable, and they operate more like a relationship-driven gift economy than a currency, with generosity the rule. Some have a reputation system built in to encourage good behavior. Timebanks tend to share core values that everyone's life and work are valuable, that everyone should be cared for equally, and that reciprocity and caring are key to a healthy economy. Timebanks have proven superior to money in applications such as senior care, disabled peer support and childcare and nonprofit service provision.
In New York and Montpelier, Vermont, and St. Louis, Timebanks have received large government grants to facilitate mutual assistance care for the sick and elderly in a more economically sustainable than the government can facilitate, as well as creating community amongst socially isolated people. The Visiting Nurses of New York Timebank conducted a study demonstrating remarkable impact in facilitating new friendships across cultures and languages and improving self-reported mental and physical health. Timebanks in their modern form originated in the ‘80s, but only recently took off, now numbering in the hundreds. They were also popular during the Great Depression amongst hundreds of thousands of members of unemployed associations that created a self-sufficient parallel economy, getting most of their needs met and orchestrating manufacturing, education, and more through exchange of hour credits, like the UXA. International Timebank organizations include OS Currency, Timebanks USA, hOur World, and Time for the World.
Whereas Timebanks and LETS have not yet succeeded in capturing a significant portion of the formal economy, community paper scrips have stepped in to fill the need. Berkshares and Ithaca hours are two successful versions of local scrip invented in the U.S. to support local business. Berkshares are a discount community currency backed by $USD that are widely accepted by businesses and banks in the Berkshires region of Massachusetts. The scheme is similar to the German Chiemgauer, which is a regional paper currency with negative interest built in (through required expiration renewal stamps). The Chiemgauer has succeeded in encouraging local import replacement businesses, like apple production, driven by flood of local currency that businesses accumulate from customers and only spend at other local businesses. Ithaca hours are issued by a nonprofit for membership, providing the goods and services based on trust in community, as well as transportation – the hours are accepted by the local transit authority.
Other scrips or paper currencies are popping up across the country from Corvallis Hours, to Detroit Cheers, to the Washington D.C. Potomac and Sand Dollars (New Earth Exchange) in Santa Cruz, CA. Many can’t get off the ground with out financial support, while other struggle along until their currency is worth valuable services or goods. Credit card forms of business-backed currency that function more like local business rewards or discount cards are gaining ground to compete with the modern efficiency of digital money, like Sonoma Go Local, Bernal Bucks and the City government initiative, the Oakland Acorn — all in the progressive nexus of Northern California. Both Bernal Bucks and Sonoma Go Local are planning on using their reward funds to support local business development when conventional loans are unavailable or at too high interest. Many local currencies also make grants to nonprofits.In Brazil, over 50 community banks have drastically reduced poverty by issuing their own paper and credit card currencies based on the Banco Palmas model. Palmas are issued into circulation to fund community and infrastructure development projects and as small business loans and personal loans, dispersed based on community reputation rather than capital or collateral. They are run by community-based organizations. Local businesses and nonprofits directly incubated from Palmas advance the lives of youth, women, the poor, and artists. Palmas type currencies now help many Brazilians meet most of their needs locally, and invigorate the local economy with a charge of currency and employment. Palmas have proven so successful in alleviating poverty that they are now supported by the Brazilian national government. Venezuela has been experimenting with the Palmas model and it is widely promoted by the Chavez government.
Still in use today, Argentina's grassroots currency initiative, called the Red de Trueque, emerged to provide a third of the country with a means of exchange for basic needs during its economic crash in 1999, when large banks frozen resident's accounts and fled the country with currency. Woergl, Austria provides a brief but inspiring example of a municipal issued currency that pulled the city out of an economic crisis during the Great Depression. It functioned by spending into circulation depreciating local currency backed by public works, providing a dramatic 30% unemployment relief rate in in one year. It was crushed for its wild success by the national government as a grassroots threat to the national currency.
Instead of placing faith in the “economic experts,” these currency projects are built on faith in community and the creation of real wealth. When carefully designed, they can be a source of community empowerment, prioritizing caring relationships and community values ahead of profit as well as and generating meaningful employment at local businesses. As shops shut down around us, municipal governments cut services, and the unemployed fall through the widening crevices in our economic system, perhaps its time we take our economy into our own hands. As these projects demonstrate, democratically controlled local money can be a powerful tool in shifting economic power and transforming the economy into a more loving and sustainable one.
For more information about local currencies, see the SF BACE library, Community Currency Magazine, and the Complementary Currency Database.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



8 Comments so far
Show AllState dollars from state banks?
North Dakota proved that even going half way by having a state bank utilizing US currency kept that state from crashing as bad as the other 49 states during the past three years.
.
Excerpt from "Local exchange trading system", Wikipedia:
Local exchange trading systems (LETS), also known as LETSystems, are locally initiated, democratically organised, not-for-profit community enterprises that provide a community information service and record transactions of members exchanging goods and services by using the currency of locally created LETS Credits.[1] In some places, e.g. Toronto, the scheme has been called the Local Employment and Trading System. In New South Wales, Australia, they were known as Local Energy Transfer Systems.
Michael Linton originated the term "local exchange trading system" in 1983 and for a time ran the Comox Valley LETSystems in Courtenay, British Columbia.[2] The system he designed was intended as an adjunct to the national currency, rather than a replacement for it,[3] although there are examples of individuals who have managed to replace their use of national currency through inventive usage of LETS.[citation needed]
- -
Article URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_exchange_trading_system
___________________________________________________________________
.
Excerpt from "LETSystem" Home Page:
Theory and overview
The LETSystem Design Manual
A comprehensive manual detailing all aspects of LETSystem design and development,
by Michael Linton and Angus Soutar.
LETSystems - FAQs
Frequently asked questions answered.
LETSystems - new money
An overview of LETSystems, local currencies and the future of money
by Michael Linton, designer of the LETSystem.
Practice
LETSgo - community way
Current LETSystem development materials.
Materials for downloading
Tools for LETSystem builders - software, administration and user materials.
Discussion and Development
The Explore Directory
A collection of pages on LETSystems development, open for contributions (in and with moderation) from any who want to add to the discussion.
Other Views
Links to associated topics.
- -
Webpage URL: www.gmlets.u-net.com/
___________________________________________________________________
.
Excerpt from "Ithaca Hours", Wikipedia:
The Ithaca HOUR is a local currency used in Ithaca, New York and is the oldest and largest local currency system in the United States that is still operating.[1] It has inspired other similar systems in Madison, Wisconsin; Corvallis, Oregon;[2] and a proposed system in the Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania.[3] One Ithaca HOUR is valued at US$10 and is generally recommended to be used as payment for one hour's work, although the rate is negotiable.
Contents
1 The Currency
2 Origin
3 Management
4 Economic development
5 See also
6 References
7 External links
The Currency
Ithaca HOURS are not backed by national currency and cannot be freely converted to national currency, although some businesses may agree to buy them.[4]
HOURS are printed on high-quality paper and use faint graphics that would be difficult to reproduce, and each bill is stamped with a serial number, in order to discourage counterfeiting.[2][5]
In 2002, a one-tenth hour bill was introduced, partly due to the encouragement and funding from Alternatives Federal Credit Union and feedback from retailers who complained about the awkwardness of only having larger denominations to work with; the bills bear the signatures of both HOURS President Steve Burke and the president of AFCU.[5]
Origin
Ithaca Hours were started by Paul Glover in November 1991.[6] The system has historical roots in scrip and alternative and local currencies that proliferated in America during the great depression.[6]
While doing research into local economics during 1989, Glover had seen an "Hour" note 19th century British industrialist Robert Owen issued to his workers for spending at his company store. After Ithaca Hours began, he discovered that Owen's Hours were based on Josiah Warren's "Time Store" notes of 1827.
- -
Article URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ithaca_Hours
Thanks Mira! Great article and good to see this on CD!
I'd also encourage people to look up author Thomas H. Greco for more on the topic.
.
John Steinsvold's Article "Home of the Brave" Advocating
the Complete Abolition of Money in the United States.
,
Some people seem to imagine that revolution can realistically and non-violently be accomplished without any struggle through the spontaneous appearance of overwhelming agreement within society about what must be done.
Here is yet another example of this sort of idealism.
- -
The following comment and the two posts in reply were previously posted under the article "Citizens United Spends Big In Ohio" by Dave Levinthal, November 3, 2011 by Politico.com
Article URL: http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/11/03-3
,
Posted by John Steinsvold
Nov 5 2011 - 10:01pm.
An Alternative to Capitalism (if the people knew about it, they would demand it) Several decades ago, Margaret Thatcher claimed: "There is no alternative". She was referring to capitalism. Today, this negative attitude still persists. I would like to offer an alternative to capitalism for the American people to consider. Please click on the following link. It will take you to an essay titled: "Home of the Brave?" which was published by the Athenaeum Library of Philosophy: http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm John Steinsvold Perhaps in time the so-called dark ages will be thought of as including our own. --Georg C. Lichtenberg .
.
(Part 1 of 2)
Reply to John Steinsvold Regarding His Article "Home of the Brave"
Advocating the Complete Abolition of Money in the United States.
.
John Steinsvold wrote:
An Alternative to Capitalism (if the people knew about it, they would demand it) Several decades ago, Margaret Thatcher claimed: "There is no alternative". She was referring to capitalism. Today, this negative attitude still persists. I would like to offer an alternative to capitalism for the American people to consider. Please click on the following link. It will take you to an essay titled: "Home of the Brave?" which was published by the Athenaeum Library of Philosophy: http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm John Steinsvold Perhaps in time the so-called dark ages will be thought of as including our own. --Georg C. Lichtenberg
- - - - -
Excerpt from "Home of the Brave" by John Steinsvold, Athenaeum Library of Philosophy:
We Americans [sic] love our freedom; yet, we have allowed the use of money to completely dominate our way of life. Indeed, we are no longer a free people. We are 7.4 trillion dollars in debt. We live in fear of depression, inflation, inadequate medical coverage and losing our jobs. Our freedom is at stake if not our very survival. Yet, we put our collective heads in the sand.
- - - - -
Excerpt from "Home of the Brave" by John Steinsvold, Athenaeum Library of Philosophy:
Yes, in order to administrate a way of life without money, economic bodies, boards or councils or whatever you wish to call them would be created to absorb economic responsibility from our various governments. They will interact and cooperate with one another to meet the economic needs of our country and of each individual. They will be empowered by Congress to tend to the economic needs of its constituents. Thus, a balance of power will be safely maintained.
Our federal needs, which would be similar to the federal budget we have today, will be resolved by an economic body comprised of representatives of the various branches of government, our industrial & labor resources, research (in medicine, education, science & space), our environment, conservation, importing & exporting, and now, national security and whatever facet of our way of life should be represented. This economic body will arrange for the labor and material resources necessary to meet the economic needs of our nation.
Similarly, the same will occur at the state and local levels. The economic body at the local levels will be responsible for providing services to the people in the neighborhood. If the labor needs cannot be met with volunteer workers, "perks" must be offered. Also, the economic body at the local levels will be responsible for keeping the stores stocked with food, clothing and the common luxuries which will be available free. Thus, the economic needs of the nation right on down to the neighborhood levels would be determined and satisfied by these economic bodies.
How much economic responsibility will these new bodies absorb from our federal, state and local governments? How much will be shared? Can a balance of power be maintained? At any rate, our federal, state and local governments will be relieved of considerable amount of economic responsibility. Thus, our various governments will be free to catch up on all the other domestic and foreign issues that face us.
- -
Article URL: http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm
* * * * *
My Reply:
John Steinsvold,
Well, I do agree with you that "we have allowed the use of money to completely dominate our way of life", and that Margaret Thatcher was wrong when she claimed that "[t]here is no alternative" to capitalism. But I think there are more plausible and reliably routes to abolishing capitalism than the one you propose; a route which depends completely upon both the abolishment of money, and of course the development of an overwhelming consensus within society to abolish money.
Another problem is that the post-money society which you envision, if people in society could actually find a way to get there, would be intensely dependent on representative democracy. Even if money could be eliminated from politics, and money would be eliminated from politics if money could actually be eliminated from society, genuine representative democracy still would not exist in the United States. Among other things Plurality Voting would need to be replaced with a consent / dissent grading scale based voting procedure, such as Yes No 'Maybe So' Voting or Category Scale Power Voting.
By the way Plurality Voting is incapable of even identifying whether or not majority consent, much less unanimous consensus, exists within an electorate. Please consider the following three simple examples, using just three person electorates, that demonstrate this fact, which I will post in immediate reply to this comment.
Regards,
Peter K. Harrell
.
.
(Part 2 of 2)
Reply to John Steinsvold Regarding His Article "Home of the Brave"
Advocating the Complete Abolition of Money in the United States.
Plurality Voting is Undemocratic and Must Be Replaced
John Steinsvold,
Plurality Voting is essentially a preference based voting procedure that severely limits each voter's freedom of speech and freedom of political association, by requiring that voters vote "Yes" and only "Yes" for one and only one of the alternatives on the ballot; thereby dividing the alternatives into two categories, a preferred category consisting of just one of the alternatives and a non-preferred category consisting of all the other alternatives on the ballot, if any.
Here are the three simple examples I mentioned in my previous comment, using just three person electorates, that demonstrate that Plurality Voting is incapable of even identifying whether or not majority consent exists, much less whether or not unanimous consent (i.e. consensus) exists, within an electorate.
______________________________________________________________
Example 1 (Majority Dissent):
Person 1
Prefers Alternative A to Alternative B
Likes and supports Alternative A, but dislikes and opposes Alternative B.
Person 2
Prefers Alternative A to Alternative B
Dislikes and opposes both Alternative A and Alternative B
Person 3
Prefers Alternative B to Alternative A
Likes and supports Alternative B, but dislikes and opposes Alternative A.
- -
Please note that Alternative A is preferred to Alternative B, and that both Alternative A and Alternative B are disliked and opposed by a majority of the electorate.
Alternative A is preferred to Alternative B by a majority consisting of Person 1 and Person 2 versus Person 3. Alternative A is disliked and opposed by a majority consisting of Person 2 and Person 3 versus Person 1. Alternative B is disliked and opposed by a majority consisting of Person 1 and Person 2 versus Person 3.
If Person 2 votes despite disliking and opposing both alternatives, the electorate will choose Alternative A. Otherwise there is a tie.
Please also note that adding a "None of the Above" (NOTA) option does not result in a NOTA victory. By adding additional people, Example 1 can easy be converted into additional examples where Alternative A wins and NOTA loses despite the fact that both Alternative A and Alternative B are disliked and opposed by a majority of the electorate.
* * * * *
Example 2 (Majority Consent: The Majority Rule Voting Paradox):
The following three person example describes the simplest circumstances under which a Majority Rule Voting Paradox can exist within an electorate.
Person 1
Prefers Alternative A to Alternative B
Likes and supports both Alternative A and Alternative B
Person 2
Prefers Alternative A to Alternative B
Dislikes and opposes both Alternative A and Alternative B
Person 3
Prefers Alternative B to Alternative A
Likes and supports Alternative B, but dislikes and opposes Alternative B.
- -
Please note that Alternative A is preferred to Alternative B; yet Alternative A is disliked and opposed by a majority of the electorate, while Alternative B is liked and supported by a majority of that same electorate.
Alternative A is preferred to Alternative B by a majority consisting of Person 1 and Person 2 versus Person 3. Alternative A is disliked and opposed by a majority consisting of Person 2 and Person 3 versus Person 1. Alternative B is liked an
and supported by a majority consisting of Person 1 and Person 3 versus Person 2.
If Person 2 votes despite disliking and opposing both alternatives, the electorate will choose Alternative A. Otherwise there is a tie.
* * * * *
Example 3 (Unanimous Consensus):
The presumption in Example 3 is that Alternative A and Alternative B have been developed using some sort of consensus decision making process, which is the reason Alternative A and Alternative B have so much support from this three person electorate.
Person 1
Prefers Alternative A to Alternative B
Likes and supports both Alternative A and Alternative B
Person 2
Prefers Alternative A to Alternative B
Likes and supports both Alternative A and Alternative B
Person 3
Prefers Alternative B to Alternative A
Likes and supports Alternative B, but dislikes and opposes Alternative B.
- -
Please note that Alternative A is preferred to Alternative B by a majority consisting of Person 1 and Person 2 versus Person 3; but Alternative A is disliked and opposed by Person 3, while Alternative B is unanimously liked and supported by all three people in the electorate, i.e. by Person 1, Person 2 and Person 3.
If both Person 1 and Person 2 vote, as they surely would; the electorate will choose Alternative A.
______________________________________________________________
The are, of course, many other more complex versions of these three simple examples that involve more voters and that include all of the six different kinds of individual opinion possible when representing individual opinion is this way.
Regards,
Peter K. Harrell