Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Why OWS Is the Next Republican Boogeyman
The Boogeyman is dead, and Santa is dying.
The Republicans have been, since the 1930s, the party of the Boogeyman. They led the fear-based crusades against Communists, first with the Blacklist, then Joe McCarthy’s hearings, then the twin fears of Communist Mao and the Communist USSR. With the death of the Soviet Union, and the corporate embrace of still-Communist China, 9/11 let them turn their fears to “radical Islam.”
But when President Obama killed Bin Laden, it took the steam out of their movement. And to make matters worse, Obama had earlier gone to Egypt and said, in essence, “Tear down these dictators!” – helping spark the Arab Spring and totally deflating the Republican fear machine, which now sputters along on the fringes trembling about Bachmann’s gays, Santorum’s fertilized eggs, and Perry’s immigrants. The likelihood of Mormon Romney’s presidential candidacy means they can’t even add “God” to their traditional “Gays, Guns, and God” trinity of GOP fears.
Without something or someone to be afraid of, the Republicans are truly lost, wandering in the wilderness. And no matter how hard they try to gin up fear of the “dreaded deficit bomb,” it just doesn’t make Americans jump the way the USSR’s nukes did two generations ago, or 9/11 did a decade ago. So now they’re trying to whip up fear of the Occupy Wall Street folks, but so far OWS has the sympathy of average Americans; it’s just not working for the Republicans.
But the Democrats aren’t doing much better.
Back in 1976, Republican strategist Jude Wanniski invented the phrase “supply side economics” and then proposed his famous “Two Santa Clauses theory” to sell it.
Democrats, he said, had always been the party of Santa – bearing gifts to the American people like unemployment insurance, Social Security, Medicare, the 40-hour workweek, safe workplaces, clean air and water, and the minimum wage. What the American people needed, they got – and they got it from the Democrats playing the role of Santa.
The Republicans, Wanniski pointed out, had always been the anti-Santa party, saying “No” to virtually every single “Santa gift” Democrats wanted to give to the American people, for over a century.
But, Wanniski reasoned, if the Republicans could become Santas themselves – give the American people an annual gift – and at the same time could force the Democrats to stop being Santas (in Wanniski’s words, “force the Democrats to shoot Santa”), then the Democrats would be neutralized and Republicans could win elections.
His strategy was simple, and picked up virtually from Day One by the Reagan administration in 1981: When Republicans are in the White House, cut taxes dramatically (particularly on the rich, but talk about the tax cuts to working people), while also jacking up spending to bubble-stimulate the economy and make it look like the good times are flowing. And when Democrats are in the White House, block all tax increase and spending measures while screaming hysterically about the “debt bomb,” forcing austerity and economic pain for everyday Americans.
Reagan dutifully ran up more debt in 8 years than every president from George Washington to Jimmy Carter – combined. And he spent those borrowed trillions, which bubble-pumped the economy and made people think he had some wonder-cure economic patent-medicine.
Herbert Walker Bush followed Reagan’s lead, adding trillions more to the debt and throwing in a war for good effort.
When Clinton came in, the “Debt Bomb!” screams began, so Clinton dutifully shot the Santa Claus of “welfare as we know it” and kneecapped “the era of big government.”
George W. Bush put Wanniski’s program on steroids, giving the most massive Republican Santa tax-cut for billionaires in history, while borrowing almost $6 trillion and spending it all so fast, stretching the bubble so hard, that it actually popped in the last year of his presidency.
For three decades, Wanniski’s strategy has worked brilliantly for Republicans and their rich donors, with the added bonus of largely wiping out the once-politically-active and pesky unionized middle class. Three Republican presidents ran the nation’s debt up to such incredibly high levels that President Obama is now talking about shooting Santa Claus – this time, cutting Medicare and other benefits.
But Wanniski hadn’t figured on the collapse of the USSR when he put forth his theory, so now both parties are politically impotent. Republicans can’t convince Americans to be terrified anymore, given that Obama’s pretty handily (and cheaply) chopped the head off Al Queda, the Republican’s most recent boogeyman. And Democrats can’t play Santa Claus any more because the Republicans ran up so much debt, and taxes are so low, there’s no way to get enough money to revive Santa.
It’s going to make for a fascinating electoral season, as Republicans try to gin back up any fear card they can find because, to their chagrin, nobody’s really all that afraid anymore of gays, communists, or Muslims. Democrats, meanwhile, are trying to revive Santa Claus, but Republicans in the House and Senate are successfully blocking their efforts to raise the taxes on rich people and corporations necessary to bring Santa back to life.
So – at least for the moment – it’s dueling straw men.
Republicans are telling their base the next boogeyman is “Occupy Wall Street,” and using GOP TV (aka “Fox News”) and a well-funded punditocracy to push out the message. Democrats are repeatedly – but unsuccessfully – bringing before Congress proposals to revive Santa, with unemployment insurance extensions; jobs for infrastructure, teachers, and cops; and free healthcare for the growing class of the working poor via Medicare. But the American people – at least so far – actually like the OWS movement (even Republicans!), and the last election stripped Obama of the electoral advantage needed to actually pass Santa Claus legislation.
Which is why the electorate seems largely asleep, and political discussions seem vapid.
Barring another attack on America before November 2012, or the OWS movement turning violent, Republicans have lost their boogeyman. And so long as Tea Party control of the House of Representatives remains unbroken, Democrats have lost access to their Santa Claus.
Wanniski and Reagan are dead, but their legacy – and strategy – lives on…
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


72 Comments so far
Show AllThom Hartmann was once one of my heroes. I used to listen to his show almost daily up until January of this year. I stopped listening because he refuses to see Obama is as much a part of the problem as the Democrats. They're all prostitutes for Wall Street. In fact, it is almost impossible to differentiate between a Republican and Democrat anymore yet Mr. Hartmann refuses to acknowledge that. Frankly, neither party works.
I don't want to be cruel because two of the qualities about him I most appreciate(d) are his compassion and heart. That said, I also believe he's sold out. I noticed he really started to change once he moved to Washington DC and got inside the cloud of ego maniac privilege, losing touch with the rest of us.
I'm sorry he's sold out. He's an incredibly bright and gentle man who had many of us on his side. But he's lost my support, as it appears he's lost a lot of us based on these posts.
Sorry Thom, but you need to come back to our world view and see they're all sycophants kissing each others butts competing for more and more power while the rest of us sink.
Thanks for posting this. Unlike many here, I've had direct contact with Thom several years ago as a fellow Jefferson scholar and found him to be a wonderful person; bright, generous of time and spirit, and largely what I would consider the best of liberalism. He went out of his way to send me some specialized material and his thoughts on a particular research question and always kept his inbox open for converstions with people who shared his interests.
That was the Thom in Vermont before 2005.
As you point out, something happened as he moved up the food chain. It wasn't about money; he had plenty long before he took up radio again. I suspect it was pride of place in a new liberal (democrat) media.
I wasn't going to post, but your message here reminded me that this was a guy who once was very different in his message and his contributions to politicl conversation. I can't even recognize him in this essay which is absolute fantasy--especially that second paragraph.
Anyhoo, thanks for sharing similar thoughts Elizabeth.
Hartmann forgot to acknowledge the depth of corruption in the ranks of Merkan elites such as Wanniski. When Wanniski created the "Two Santas" meme it was actually intended as a distraction to camouflage from the people the boot of reality on their necks: The REAL Santa Claus was, and is, Wanniski's very own "supply-side" ekonomiks, intravenous injection/pumping huge tanks of petro-opiates, petro-konveniences, into the arms of Merkans, to hook them on comfortably-numb dependence on Das Kapital. Obviously for the people to reach their emancipation from konsumption-slavery/plunder they should create a DEMAND-SIDE economy, by breaking their addictions to Das Kapital's destructive opiates and instead demanding from markets what's in their better interests, what serves REAL human needs.
As has become his norm... Thom continues to believe that the only mechanism for change is to infiltrate the Democratic party thereby making it more progressive and balancing out the sociopathic GOP. If one believed that working within the corrupt two party oligarchy was the only way... he would be correct.
Unfortunately... Thom has become as intellectually incurious as a Bill Maher and refuses to call a spade a spade. Simply put... if it was wrong when Bush did it... it is wrong if not more so when Obama does it. The system is broken... long past time for a do over.
Thom has a good heart, a sharp mind... and I believe that he means well. He's just mistaken.
Wow... what I got from the article was some history about how the party of capital (R) scammed their way into getting enough power to set fascism in motion... and an admonition to OWS to stay peaceful... never thought he ever let Clinton or Obama off easy... here or in the past.
"JK"
Hartmann's line, near the end of this article, saying that the Tea Party republicans are keeping the democrats from playing Santa is typical of his manipulating.
The democrats deliver their gifts to the same people as the republicans and Hartmann wants us to believe otherwise.
The way things are now is not the way they have always been. The Democrats used to be the party of the people... or at least organized labor, and so their main "special interest pork projects" benefited the middle class, and the Republicans were the party of wealth and capital. But after many years of tepid showing at the polls, and then suffering public dishonor of the Nixon story, somehow the R's pulled a major comeback, pretending to be Christian to rope some well-meaning but gullible new voters into the party... and the second they got power they began eliminating campaign regulations (amongst other things), opening the door to the fascism that we are not on the doorstep of, but up to our eyebrows in. The Democrats basically had no choice but to embrace corporate campaign money, or become completely unrepresented... and as a result became Republican lite, around the time of Clinton and the DLC.
So, to my read, Thom's final argument in this article is: the Democrats make the Republicans (w/ theocracy & environmental destruction) the boogeyman, and the Republicans make the Democrats (w/ communism & hippie OWS) the boogeyman, and they cancel each other out... as long as OWS doesn't turn violent.
...and the Republicans, Tea-party or otherwise, *are* obstructing all current attempts at stimulus, not because they think it won't work, but because they know it will: it has worked for them for 30 years.
Ah..oh! I do believe that Common Dreams has now been OCCUPIED. Oh...well....Now it is the people who are speaking.
The Democrats hide behind closed doors and before election time are heard saying that we the voters have no where else to go or”Where else can they go?”
WE can go to the streets!
We go to the streets “before” the elections and that is where we stay until our demands are met. We stay there until they bring our jobs back to this country. We stay in the streets until the rich pay their fair share, and we have healthcare for ALL. We stay in the streets until Wall Street pays us back.
WE stay in the streets with our brother and sisters until we all receive the dignity and respect that we are all afforded, and to all others who live in this country.....with or without papers.
We stay in the streets until all children are fed, clothed and have decent shelter. We stay in the streets until public education is priority one. We stay in the streets until we remove the troops from every other country in the world. WE stay in the streets until we deploy our troops home to rebuild America.
WE stay in the streets until, school by school and road by road and every neglected neighborhood has been cleaned and repaired. We stay in the streets until all of our crumbling roads, bridges and damns are renewed. We stay in the streets until every farmer has a local market to sell to and who is paid a fair price for his labor. We stay in the streets demanding an energy program that does not require us to go to other counties to kill other people to make some businesses richer. We stay in the streets until we get our country back.
Visual things work. May I suggest an additional way to occupy?
A decent symbol for the 99% is the bare base of the PYRAMID from the Great Seal on the back of the dollar bill. No cap/eye, just the base.
Find square cardboard boxes, cut and tape them into that shape and let them sprout up all over the country... it's OUR pyramid with the plutocracy whooshed off the top. Public property. Might help give the movement a little focus, too.
Who is this man, this Thom Hartmann?
Either this man is stupid or he believes everyone else is. This is one of the stupidest articles yet posted on CD.
I can only presume from the volume of completely inane comments happening here that Thom Hartmann must be pushing some buttons... or speaking some serious truth! Its *from* Thom that I get my understanding that we are in fascism NOW, and the Democratic party is just as beholden to corporate money as the Republicans. Did any of you actually read the article!!!
There's no doubt that some people don't read the pieces of certain mainstream liberals anymore before they unload their ordnance. I *did* read this piece. ANd while some of the essay is reasonably accurate in terms of policy strategy, the core assumption that Democrats really *are* substantively different than Repos is still peddled here, as is the myth of Obama being a good man hamstrung by a nasty GOP. This is a perspective with absolutely zero empirical support and is probably why most of us respond to Hartmnn the way we do. HIs second paragraph alone is pure hagiographic fantasy of the worst order.
"Hagiographic," that's a good one: derogatory phrase used to describe biographers perceived to be uncritical or reverential of their subject.
Unfortunately for your rhetoric, Obama is not the subject of this article, the subject is the demonization of OWS by the Republicans, and the second paragraph describes how, *in the mainstream perception*, the usual Republican boogeymen have been neutralized as campaign issues.
I am fully aware that Democrats have sold out, I haven't considered voting to matter much to actual economic or foreign policy since Reagan, but I do still consider voting to be a referendum on the social issues that the parties claim to espouse, and there are HUGE differences there.
Many of us hope we can fix this without a systemic collapse (ie a lot of death & suffering) or violent revolution (more suffering, death, grudges lasting generations, and possible fast track to totalitarian police state) both of which play right into the hands of the global corporate oligarchy. The only thing that can stand up to GE/Citbank/Monsanto/Pfizer etc is OUR GOVERNMENT, WHICH IS US. The scary future we face is no longer Orwell's "1984," but rather Neal Stephenson's "Snow Crash" where the US is balkanized into corporate franchise mini-republics.
There is no way our government will stand up to GE/Citibank/Monsanto, et al because our government is OWNED by those entities. Come on, you say you are aware the Democrats have sold out and voting doesn't matter. The scary future is here and the sooner we face the hard truth, the sooner we can change its course. The reformist nonsense that Thom Hartmann spews can only postpone the inevitable. And not for much longer.
jK, Why not point out in THIS article where Hartmann asserts that "Democratic party is just as beholden to corporate money as the Republicans." The only "inane" comments I see expressed here is a type of guru fetishism bouncing around from one comment to another to defend your hero. If anyone here is getting their "buttons" pushed, it is you! Hartmann has never spoke truth in his life: but he does speak a lot of half truths. It matters not what the Republican's may frame OWS movement to be: the only one's who listen to Republican's are Wall Street insiders, and Tea Party nut jobs. The fact that the GOP is in fear mode reflects their loosening grip on reality; a quality shared by your guru, Hartmann.
Maybe you can go back over to Huffington and get your hand held by the other faux lip service libs. :)
At least the other trolls take the time and effort to come up with different posts in different threads. They're starting to accuse you of giving them a bad name.
I think he's an intern, just starting his career. A troll-tern, if you will. He'll improve with practice--I hope.
Hartmann is a mainstream democrat. I have listened to enough of his shows. And i can't stomach him. Pure and simple. Also, this article gave me a headache. The Santa Claus metaphor annoyed me. I found it unneccesary and that is my personal opinion. No one else need care.