Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- Bolivia's Morales Calls for New Era of 'Peace and Unity' to Break Greed of Capitalism
- What If All the World’s Debt Just Went Away
- Sen. Bernie Sanders: 'Mr. President, I am Disappointed'
- 8 Deficit Reducers That Are More Ethical—And More Effective—Than the 'Chained CPI'
- Obama Will Ride to the Rescue... for Republicans
Popular content
Today's Top News
Who Is Demonizing the Rich?
Obama and Occupy Wall Street
Last weekend, at the dedication of the Martin Luther King, Jr. National Memorial on the Washington Mall, two of King’s children gave shout-outs to Occupy Wall Street, now spreading around the country and the world. His daughter Bernice spoke of it as “a freedom explosion” and his son Martin eloquently hailed “the young people of the Occupy movement all over this country and throughout the world [who] are seeking justice... for working class people barely making it, justice for middle class folk unable to pay their mortgages... justice for the young people who graduate from college and are unemployed and burdened by student loans they cannot repay, justice for everyone who is simply asking the wealthy and corporations to pay their fair share.”
photo: OccupyAmsterdam
When President Obama gave his speech on King, he referred to the Occupy movement only once and obliquely. “If [King] were alive today,” he said, “I believe he would remind us that the unemployed worker can rightly challenge the excesses of Wall Street without demonizing all who work there...” Amid the list of King's accomplishments, he conspicuously did not mention that his last act before being assassinated was to organize the Poor People’s Campaign, including “Resurrection City,” a shantytown of “plywood, teepee-looking A-frames, houses,” all built on that same Mall to reveal the look, and so the existence, of the poor to the eyes of the rich -- and to the nation.
Daniel Levine, a 20-year-old college student manning the Occupy Wall Street information table at Zuccotti Park, responded to President Obama’s “demonizing” remark this way: “He’s trying to make excuses for the rich people who donate to his campaign. The rich demonized themselves the second they decided they were going to make fraudulent derivative swaps, the minute they decided to evict people from homes they didn’t even own.” It was a sentiment that might be widely seconded throughout the Occupy movement (from which, in word or image, the president remains missing in action).
Give Obama credit, though. He practices what he preaches. While he did once refer to the denizens of Wall Street as “fat cats,” the Washington Post recently reported that his 2012 election campaign has done anything but demonize them. In fact, so far early in this election season, according to new fundraising data, the campaign has “managed to raise far more money... from the financial and banking sector than Mitt Romney or any other Republican presidential candidate.” (Not that Romney has been suffering when it comes to Wall Street, where he’s raising money hand over fist from all the firms you love to hate.)
Meanwhile, in New York City, Mayor Bloomberg is making no less subtle distinctions than the president. Having tried and failed to demonize and evict the occupiers of Zuccotti Park on the grounds of uncleanliness, he is now coming out in favor of the rights of human beings -- but not of tents. At a recent news conference, he announced that “the Constitution doesn’t protect tents, it protects speech and assembly.” Except for medical tents, few Zuccotti Park occupiers have them, but in his urge to oust the protesters the mayor is obviously confusing the tent cities of the homeless with the encampment in his jurisdiction. As Barbara Ehrenreich, author of Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America, makes clear in a new piece, “Throw Them Out With the Trash, Why Homelessness Is Becoming an Occupy Wall Street Issue,” for the 1%, the fate of the homeless and of the demonstrators in lower Manhattan is merging.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...




45 Comments so far
Show AllEvery nerve revolted by what I hear, read, and see.
Murderers play games of force and extortion, the planet the prize, while the middle class idle the days away; at work or home watching wide screens, on vacations, financing Death with Their Taxes. They can vote or not, it matters not. It’s only business, nothing personal; They buy into it, especially, if there’s a sale, vote your wallet.
The sooner They fall into the lower ranks, experience hunger, the sooner the scales tip, the sooner it all ends. It’s not if, it’s when, inevitable. We must rally and help the middle class jerks out or they’ll starve, grow food.
I have just heard Michael Moore speaking on Amy Goodman's Democracy Now. I am not going to buy diapers. I am going to buy a tent! And I am going to bring my $10.00 port-a- potty! So be it.
When I am denied my Constitution right to protest by arresting me and not allowing me my use of public areas for protests…you are just making me more determined and more inventive. My elected officials have been pissing on me for years. It is time I pissed back.
O'bomber sez: “I believe he would remind us that the unemployed worker can rightly challenge the excesses of Wall Street without demonizing all who work there...”
***
Oh, really? You "believe" you have the foggiest notion what Dr. King "would remind us"?
And while he's "reminding us", would he be holding private, closed-door sessions with the banksters to work out how he was going to promote and sign legislation written by, for and of those banksters, at the expense of "the unemployed worker"?
Methinks somebody was so busy studying "constitutional law" he missed out on the study of how King actually challenged oppressive power.
Just as many people use the Holy Bible and teachings of Jesus to rationalize their behavior and actions, many have adopted MLK to do the same.
Unfortunately I have to hold my nose and vote for him considering the toxic lunatics in the other Party. I definitely believe that things would be a lot worse if the Republicans controlled Congress and the White House. I have visited Occupy twice and expressed my views as to settle on voting for the Democrats this time, not that they will do anything to make things better but I believe the Republicans would make things a lot worse. It is probably to late to try to put a new party together, maybe it could be done by 2014.
At least with the Republicans we wouldn't have to pretend they were any better.
And what is worse, a slow, compromised decline, perpetually boiling in the pot over time, or a quick decisive plunge?
Better to be over with it fast with no confusion rather than a resigned acceptance that the Democrats will be the best we can ever get--because we think they should be better--even when they are not.
Not me, I have seen the promise of next time too many times now.
I don't think the Republicans will make things much worse because they've been governing for the past 3 years in the absence of any meaningful Democratic initiatives. Anything the Obama administration has accomplished has been extremely half-assed (health reform, Wall Street reform, etc). When the Republicans are in control the Democrats at least fight back just a little (Bush's privatization of Social Security). What we have is one Capitalist Party with 2 nearly indistinguishable wings. I refuse to vote for Obama the sellout.
Sorry I cannot vote for the candidate who boasts of his support from the nuclear power industry in 2012 after Fukushima any more than I could vote for him in 2008. It is a pity the Republicans are so set on nominating anti-science loons I cannot vote for either.
That there are Democrats worthy of my vote lower on the ballot does not make me vote for Obama.
As long as we frame our elections as a choice for the lesser of two evils we will continue to accept that having a choice of two evils is normal and thus we will always be governed by evil.
Right, voting for either party is voting for continued corruption. Better not to vote and to fly the flag upside down. Vote local and take back our towns and cities instead.
Mike,
Obama HAS made things worse. He's accomplished more regressive policy and war under camouflage as a Trojan horse or wolf in sheep's clothing than Bush could ever have achieved. Often the apparent lesser evil is in fact more dangerous for what it can achieve through stealth and deception. A nominal Republican could never have implemented the heatlh-racket bailout bill (captive market without public option, drugmakers protected from competition, etc.); started new wars; shielded fraudsters, torturers and other war criminals; continued bankster bailouts; appointed all foxes to public henhouses; or served up Social Security to his cronies on Wall Street, which he is in the process of doing while pretending to protect it. Like the father of lies masquerading as an angel of light, Obama IS the greater evil . Wake up!
Yes, Obama is much more dangerous because he hamstrings progressive opposition to Rep/Dem corporatist agendas. It would be much easier to mount opposition to a Perry or Romney.
If all the OWS who tend towards "progressive" registered into the Green Party, they (we) could effectively control it and write its platform. If those who tend more "libertarian" registered Rebublican, they (we) could make Ron Paul its candidate. Then the 2012 election might mean something, as well as be interesting. My guess is Paul would win, but the Green Party would continue to grow, replace the Dems, and win the next election.
This is exactly what I am preaching in my locality. All progressives should support the Greens and I believe we could make a show of what it really means to CHANGE.
That "demonizing" remark is very revealing. It shows how much Obama self identifies with Wall Streeters. He probably has many personal friends among them. For him to suggest King would have the same tender solicitude for banksters as he does is infuriating. Really obscene. Cornell West calls Obama a black mascot of Wall St.
One suspects MLK, along with the protesters, would have approved, much to Obama's chagrin, this slogan put forth by writer Paul Street:
Fight the Rich, Not Their Wars
I wonder what the reaction would be if the Obama campaign said it would not accept any money from Wall Street. I think it would be a boon. I think he would gain much more in voter support than he would lose in dollars. I think it would be a dramatic way to show whose side he is really on.-- But I must be dreaming-- that will never happen. Not for Obama or for the the Democratic party. Look at it inversely-- they do take Wall Street money. In fact they grovel for it. And we already do know what side they are on.
"I wonder what the reaction would be if the Obama campaign said it would not accept any money from Wall Street."
Oh, that's an easy one to answer.
Obama would be O-U-T of the White House so fast it would make your head spin. And the leading Corporate friendly Rethug would be in there disinfecting the place to get the perceived 'funky black person smell' out. And you know it.
You conveniently forget that Obummer is the leading beneficiary of Wall St. largess, have received more in campaign donations from the TBTF banks than the next three Republicans combined! And you have to remember it was under Obombya that 'Citizens United' was passed.
It doesn't matter who you 'vote' for. The Government gets in.
Pardon my tangent, tammons, but one of the most outrageous bits of hype successfully floated by Team Obama's award-winning 2008 marketing campaign was the myth that Obama's campaign was funded solely, or at least principally, by small, sacrificial contributions from ordinary unprivileged citizens.
Well after the election, many Obamabots insisted that Obama was not like the others; he was a Man of the People who disdained financial support from corporations and the wealthy, and did not intend to be beholden to them.
I'm sure the 2012 Team Obama will come up with some sort of equivalent flim-flam to fool the complacent and desperate into believing that Obama is the champion of the humble, bottom-up, grassroots constituency.
*I* was tricked by that propaganda. I didn't find Common Dreams and Firedoglake until after the election, but I don't accept that as any excuse. I've grown since then and have added a healthy dose of Marxist skepticism of the messenger to my political thinking.
Hey-read the last sentence of my comment. I was merely being rhetorical. I was using the conditional mode rhetorically--don't you guys get it?
I'll demonize them. I'd be glad to. Consider them demonized.
It must be remembered that the wealthy live in a state of constant terror that their riches will disappear, that if they start being taxed, it will snowball into something that will take away their every last cent.
I say keep telling the rest of the people that the rich are to blame for everything. It stirs the stew (Edward Abbey reference).
The Edward Abbey quote to which I am referring is: "Society is like a stew. If you don't stir it up every once in a while, then a layer of scum floats to the top."
Our "layer of scum" is quite thick and deep and is holding back all that is boiling beneath it, but it won't be able to do that for too much longer.
the movement without causes begins to have causes...
forgive me...
while I rant frequently about property ownership, and believe it must be negated for us to save the planet, I cannot feel the same sympathy for a college student unable to repay school loans that I feel for a homeowner burdened by a questionable mortgage...
while trends are evident in many areas, one must live somewhere, and pay for such living, so a mortgage, or rent, is, at least, a necessity, at this time...
a loan for college is a gamble...a gamble that one might work less to gain more than one's inferior fellows...
if one gambles at improving one's advantage without adequate knowledge of one's game of choice, one will probably lose...
best to do homework, in advance...it would certainly indicate intelligence to do so, and make appropriate choices based on such...
all industry, and, therefore, all economic activity, begins, and ends, with the living world...
there is no other source...
we can no longer con ourselves that we may continue to cheat nature out of our lifestyles...
we can no longer pretend the current, poisoned world is still the healthy one of distant pasts...
nor can we go on conning each other that one's 'job' doesn't harm another...
your college, and your eventual career, is costing me my planet...costing you yours, too, but you cannot see it, I guess, because you sure aren't commenting...could be that critical thinking problem...
take your college loan, the financial institutions that provided it to you, and your ignorance about inherent responsibilities and negligent impact, and shove it...
no sympathy for you...
I am awash in the breath and spittle of the Water Dragons of Fukushima...how concerned are you for my plight, which is sure to be your own?
enough to give up electricity?
exactly...
next?
You are one spiteful, nasty piece of work Mr.dubet with your demonizing the poor college students in this pathetic, third world culture that is the fetid and sordid soul of the United States. And what's this babble about "life", and "living somewhere", and "living world"?
I am not always spiteful and nasty...I am often funny and engaging, in a different setting...
the topics discussed on this site do not bring out the funny part...unless in a 'black humor' way...
the current rise of the networked drones at the hands of my criminal government has me particularly 'fidgety', as does my fellow's apparent fascination with a fraudulent political system, and a faulty philosophical one...
you are absolutely correct that I am struggling mightily to continue to tolerate our ongoing willful ignorance about our own roles, or those of our criminal 'leaders', as watching my planet suffer grievous, and increasingly widespread, injury over the past few years is putting a severe damper on my humor regarding human behavior, which, of course, means human thinking...
watching people from all walks of life casually talk on the phone or text while they do virtually everything, up to and including the inherently, potentially fatal act of piloting a motorized multi-ton vehicle, and not even question that all around them are also doing so, makes me question what value a human brain, at all...
have you noticed, lately, that one can be surrounded by a sea of people, and have not one of them aware of one's presence, or actions?
they physically exist, but are utterly elsewhere...
it leaves me to wonder: are they ever truly anywhere, anymore, or is their phone their 'residence'?
where are parents, and what are they counseling their children?
call me spiteful, call me nasty, but I am breathing hot particles again today...why should I not be?
will that be addressed by any of these students? will the fact that many of them are also breathing hot particles?
will our predilection toward electronic devices be questioned by anyone today?
no, we will discuss Wall Street, or 'college', and 'jobs'...
fracking both pays well and poisons well...which do we need more?
we are but naked monkeys utterly dependent upon this planet...
in our hubris, we destroy our fundamental requirement, the 'living world' you question, that we might attain personal 'success', or 'enlightenment', never even acknowledging that this very goal, 'success', is planted within us by our oppressors...
paybacks are a bitch, and the biggest payback imaginable lies ahead, as vital resources disappear...much bigger than a financial loan for advantage...
forgive me for reminding...and not doing so more politely...
sometimes, it seems only the emotional slap across the face may awaken...
the tragedy is not that I appear spiteful or nasty in attempting to awaken...
the tragedy will be that nothing succeeds in awakening...
after all, the ongoing triple nuclear meltdown in Japan isn't waking anyone...
this 'Occupy' movement seems to be going in precisely the opposite direction...
back to widespread energy use, back to trust in government...
back to school, and work, and sleep...
Fukushima doesn't sleep...
rather comforting to be able to consider me spiteful, or nasty, as that at least implies the potential to be friendly, or compassionate...
a radioactive particle, of course, is neither spiteful or nasty, nor friendly or compassionate...
it simply bombards whatever it encounters...no emotions required...
like a drone...
the alarm is clanging...
Fukushima, the Dragon that will not die;
I’ve watched it spit its venom into the sky,
And dump its excrement upon the ground
Where generations will expire without a sound.
Dig it up, bury it, filter the air.
The Dragon will spew more poison without care,
Until the ground, water, air, are filled with its foul scent.
And malformed babies abound, with bodies bent.
Always remember, while bucks, shekels, yen and yuan rule,
War, nukes and biogenetics will just be a tool
For gathering wealth of their choice,
As they keep billions of souls from having a voice.
Perhaps the People are beginning to awaken,
As they gather to Occupy and steps are taken,
To dismantle the Wealthy and their endless greed.
To plant, in their place, a fresh and viable seed.
Steve Osborn
24 Oct. 2011
Here is a good one.
After all of Obama's complicit 'pragmatism', foot-dragging, leading from behind capitulation and incrementalism...His desperate attempts to portray himself as a war president in the Bush mold because he has nothing to run on, his constant carping that "change takes time" or "peace is hard" or he just needs more time--like he was actually addressing something or reversing course...his latest campaign slogan?
"We Can't wait!"
Cain very directly laid out the GOP position on the poor when he said,"If your not rich its your own fault."
"Who is Demonizing the Rich?" You ever seen what's moored out at the end of Straight Wharf, Nantucket Town? The modest housing on Shelter Island? I don't think the rich need any help in the demonizing department.
The 1% are demons. One can not demonize someone who is already a demon. O knows it and so does OWS. It is not as O tries to imply, just one or two bad apples. The 1% are demons. For the President to publicly acknowledging the fact would almost certainly, mean his literal death. These demons do not play nice with others and they will not be exposed by one who is in the fold.
If a mugger is willing to kill an old woman for her Social Security check, just imagine what a banker is willing to do in order to steal millions.
Hmmm...has Anonymous struck an overdue blow for freedom of the press?
Huffington Post ran a story this morning about the ongoing efforts by Mastercard, PayPal and Western Union to starve Wikileaks of funds, but the comment section of the article was subject to the most extreme moderation I've seen on the site to date.
A few of the regular posters did manage to circumvent the onerous HP filter, however, and lodged complaints about the undue censorship.
HP's entire comment system is now "Down for routine maintenance". LMAO
WE are the 99%!!!
Being rich for the sake of richness isn't what is being demonized. John Lennon was rich, but he cared about the health and safety of the 99%.
There are thousands of Americans who got cancer or diabetes and were subsequently illegally cut off from their health insurance. My sister was one of them. She died quite a few years ago. At an occupy, a guy told me his father was another, and his father died last month. Many of them died for lack of health insurance money, or died of grief. The wealthy people who did it aren't so much demonized as they are not yet prosecuted for manslaughter. There are laws on the books against killing human beings for money, but they need to be enforced.
The same goes for the people who sold us cigarettes, bad coal mining jobs, carcinogens in our food, heart attack food, lots and lots of stuff. The same goes for the war profiteers. The same goes for the financiers and jackals who overthrow someone else's democracy in order to mostly enslave a few million people.
Too many rich people are in league with the rich man of whom Lazarus begged for the crumbs from his table, and was denied. In the Bible story, the rich man eventually died and went to a terrible, lonely place. Jesus of Nazareth demonized such uncaring behavior, but didn't demonize all rich people. It's not just being rich, but the cutting off of the world's 99% from their own lives that is the mortal sin.
You can't "demonize" a DEMON, nor an entire class of demons...
I think we not only want corporations to their fair share of taxes, but also to have a social and environmental conscience. I think we have monopolies proliferating in every area: the press, publishing, retail, manufacture, you name it. Paying their fair share of taxes is not the limit of what is wanted and needed. Didn't we use to have anti-trust laws? It seems that they aren't working anymore.
"Without money, we'd all be rich".
A direct democratic proposition: Abolish all taxation. A yearly referendum will determine how much money/power any person would be able to have, including assets. The excess would have to be given away only to persons by the bearer, or be deleted and destroyed.
Sign this petition for the survival of humanity.- - -Free Energy Now, the Ultimate Human Right”.- - -clean energy for life is humanity’s gift to her people--johnpnts
i like that you say, "Remember that you are one with humanity." we need to step away from self-worship. like carl sagan said, "if you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, first you need create the cosmos!" we arrived upon an orb filled to the brim with "free and abundant energy." energy IS all. ask einstein. the only gift humanity can truly offer is unabashed appreciation for all that we see. why the tiniest bee gives greater gifts than we!
Visual things work. May I suggest an additional way to occupy?
A decent symbol for the 99% is the bare base of the PYRAMID from the Great Seal on the back of the dollar bill. No cap/eye, just the base.
Find square cardboard boxes, cut and tape them into that shape and let them sprout up all over the country... it's OUR pyramid with the plutocracy whooshed off the top. Public property. Might help give the movement a little focus, too.
you can tell what God thinks about money by the people he gives it all to
Of course, in America it’s bad form to demonize the rich, since to paraphrase John D Rockerfeller, “god gives them their money.”
If i were to select a visual for "occupy wall street", I would just raise my right hand, and raise it to the sky. Middle finger extended, The best civil disobedience ever invented AND IT SAYS IT ALL. ........SHORT AND SWEET..........Q