EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Only 'Success' in Iraq is that US Troops are Leaving
The U.S. occupation of Iraq is reportedly set to come to an end, with most of the roughly 40,000 soldiers currently stationed there set to be removed by year's end. But let's make no mistake: contrary to what you're likely to hear from the political and media establishment, the only thing worth celebrating is this war's end, not what it accomplished.
On October 21, President Obama announced that, “After nearly nine years, America's war in Iraq will be over.” By the end of 2011, he said, “The last American soldier will cross the border out of Iraq with their head held high, proud over their success, and knowing that the American people stand united in our support for our troops.”
While the words may be intended to soothe – no one likes to know they have fought for an ignoble cause – the truth of the matter is that there is no “success” for any American to be gloating over. And though the president and his surrogates are selling the announcement as the fulfillment of an oft-repeated promise made on the campaign trail, the fact is it's a promise the Obama administration made every effort to break.
While Obama pledged just this past August that he would have “all our folks . . . out of there by the end of the year,” Wired reports that a private army of 5,500 U.S. mercenaries will be staying on in Iraq to guard the 10,000 State Department employees – yes, 10,000 – who aren't leaving Iraq anytime soon. And CNN reports 150 troops are set to remain though 2012 “to assist in arms sales.”
If Obama had his way, it's fair to say the U.S. presence in Iraq would be even larger.
Over the summer, for instance, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta declared he had “every confidence” Iraq would request – “request” – an extended U.S. presence beyond 2012. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, traveled to Iraq to urge leaders there to “make the decision absolutely as soon as possible,” with the Washington Post reporting that Mullen insisted any extension “include guarantees of legal immunity for American forces.”
In the end, President Obama did not decide the bulk of U.S. forces would leave Iraq, however much his partisan supporters – and partisan detractors like Mitt Romney and John McCain – might like to argue that to be the case. Rather, Iraqi leaders rejected his administration's generous offer to extend the military occupation of their country, forcing him to abide by the agreement to withdrawal most U.S. forces by the end of this year to which his predecessor, George W. Bush, had already agreed.
Considering what American forces did to their country, it's not hard to see why.
Sold variously as a preemptive war of self-defense and an altruistic, humanitarian war of liberation, the 2003 invasion of Iraq tore apart a society that had already been wrecked by a decade of brutal U.S. sanctions that denied Iraqis everything from clean water to basic medical supplies, an embargo that left roughly a half-million children under the age of five dead – a catastrophic human toll that President Clinton's Secretary of State Madeleine Albright told the world was “worth it.”
The U.S. invasion of Iraq itself resulted in the violent deaths of no less than 100,000 Iraqi civilians, according to the most conservative estimate. A 2006 study by the British medical journal Lancet found that up to that point there had been more than 650,000 “excess Iraqi deaths as a consequence of the war,” factoring in the lack of medical supplies and the civil war the invasion set off. Polling firm Opinion Research Business estimated in 2008 “that over 1,000,000 Iraqi citizens” died as a result of the conflict.
More than 4.7 million Iraqis were forced to flee their homes, according to the United Nations Refugee Agency, with 2 million forced to leave the country entirely. Many Iraqi women, three million of whom are now widows according to their government, were forced into lives of prostitution, with one refugee telling The New York Times that if “they go back to Iraq they'll be slaughtered, and this is the only work available.”
More than 4,400 U.S. soldiers also needlessly died in a war based on lies, from bogus tales of Iraq's ties to al-Qaeda to claims about non-existent weapons of mass destruction that were easily debunkable at the time – had anyone in a position of power been interested in doing so.
Today, Iraq is ruled by a new strong man who has used his security forces to ethnically cleanse Baghdad, gun down non-violent protesters and torture dissidents. According to Transparency International, only three other countries in the world are more corrupt than Iraq – Afghanistan, Myanmar and Somalia – and unemployment is rampant, with nearly one in three men between 15 and 29 out of work.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



19 Comments so far
Show AllConverting all back to that primal well
From which it was derived, 'tis sooth to tell.
And against this, for every thing alive,
Of any state, avails it not to strive.
"Then is it wisdom, as it seems to me,
To make a virtue of necessity, ...
-- Chaucer, "The Canterbury Tales - the Knight's Tale"
____________________
The Obama maladministration tried its best to extend the Amerikan Imperium's military presence in Iraq, but was apparently foiled by the Iraqi's petulant refusal to issue permanent, irrevocable "Out of Jail Free Cards" to the friendly Amerikan Occupiers on hand to bring the blessings of Western-style Freedom and Democracy to the Iraqis sitting in darkness. Go figure!
So, with the speed of the pseudo-pragmatic striking snake, Team Obama now spins the withdrawal as the long-desired and awaited Glorious, Honorable Victory that rightly and justly concludes the Noble Cause.
Strictly on a local teevee-news level, this flim-flam seems to be working pretty well. "Obama Ends War in Iraq" actually bumped the "Ding, Dong, Qaddafi's Dead!" conga-line last night.
Instead of the Lockerbie victim relative crowing about "just deserts" and blessed "closure", there were a string of vox pop clips showing happy Amerikans thrilled to learn that Obama had "ended the war" in Iraq.
Everybody's hungry for good news these days, so it just doesn't do to pick through the stew too closely to figure out exactly what's in it. The important thing is that it's hot and filling.
Don't break out the champagne just yet, Medea. Like Arnold said in Terminator "they'll be baaaaaaaaaaaaaaack!" Of course, next time, they won't be "troops" but advisers. Same mercenaries, different name.
Why would you direct such a comment at Medea?
U.S. Troops are NOT leaving. If people are soldiers and they are paid by American taxes those persons are U.S. Troops whether they are official military or privatized military. We are leaving a sizable contingent of privatized U.S. Troops in Iraq paid by American taxes and taking orders ultimately from the President via the State Department.
The occupation continues. Obama and his shills, even supposed Progressives, are LYING to us.
we've stopped banging our heads against the wall........and damn if it doesn't feel good!
except that there are many more walls to bloody our heads against. any shortage and we'll just make new ones.
If McCain were elected, we would not be leaving Iraq. If the SCOTUS had not stopped the recount, Iraq would not have been invaded. Some folks just don't have a clue about American politics. Obama has done well to get the troops out. The Obama Bashers should give it a rest.
Did you READ the article? Obama tried to get the troops to stay. And with the huge embassy there, plus all the State Department occupying it, the US has not left. Why do we need a base there? Why do we need to have over 800 bases around the world? Who decided that it is ok for that?
Do you have any idea the amount of money spent on them? While millions starve here at home, cities cutting programs left and right because supposedly the US is broke.
Obama deserves to be bashed! He has broken almost every promise he ever made.
Or are you actually believing him when he promises to close Gitmo if he is re-elected?
Hello joecool9,
The number of bases has been estimated at way over the 1,000 mark. The MISC (Military-Industrial-Security-Complex) will keep growing until it devours the country. That monster MISC TBTK (Too Big To Kill).
Time to get your facts straight. It was Bush's Status of Forces Agreement that forced Obama out of Iraq - trying to just pick another Republican as a demon doesn't work, especially since Obama tried and failed to extend the troop occupation of Iraq. SCOTUS alone did not give Bush the victory. Gore didn't bother putting up a fight even 24 hours despite election irregularities and any one Democratic Senator could have held up the results because of the disenfanchisement of black voters in Florida. As far as the Iraqi invasion, the Democrats were cheerleading for the war (and voted for it) in concert with the Republicans, including Secr of State Clinton. This dispite roughly 12 million people protesting in the streets worldwide and ample evidence discounting the assertion that Saddam had WMDs. Since Obama and the Democrats have moved so far to the right, the Obamabots and Demobots have basically two campaign themes: they use over and over scaremonger voters into believing the Republicans are worse, and blame the voters (and critics).
Oh great, America finally wins a war and our cities can't afford to throw victory parades.
IRAQ - 5,000 troops + 5,000 merc's + 3,000 merc's already there; ( up 2,000 more maybe) = up to 10,000 weaponized merc's more expensive than regular troops; barry's private army paid by us!!! Tony
The strange thing is even these jobs are not held by US citizens. They've been outsourced to Ugandans and Peruvians who don't speak English, but have no compunction when it comes to killing Hajis.
"Triple Canopy has been doing that work since Iraq kicked Blackwater out in 2009 and the State Department (briefly) ended its contract with the firm. It’s more lucrative than guarding a building. If State re-ups with Triple Canopy for the full five-year span of the task order, Triple Canopy will earn $1.53 billion.
The company doesn’t have the same controversial reputation as other private firms. But the State Department’s inspector general raised red flags about Triple Canopy in a March 2010 audit. The firm doesn’t adequately enforce English-language proficiency standards for its crew of 1800 guards, most of whom come from Uganda and Peru. That’s a potential security liability in the event of an attack on the embassy, when the guards will have to corral hundreds of English speakers to safety.
What’s more, the company doesn’t provide decent housing conditions for its non-American guard force. The inspector general found they “live in crowded barracks and shipping containers,” which are over maximum occupancy capacity by as much as 400 percent."
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/05/two-more-merc-firms-get-big-iraq-contracts/
Well, the US won big time, didn’t it? Hussein’s intention to deal oil for Euros was squashed and we got a great juicy story of finding that evil man in a hole, subjecting him to a kangaroo court trial, and then a public hanging. What fun! Iraq’s infrastructure was destroyed, its highly educated population reduced to beggary, a huge “embassy” built, a kowtowing government installed, a nation reduced to terror and misery and (as a result) the requisite “enemy” of desperate people cooking up IEDs in their kitchens aroused, a blooming extremism giving US consumers reason to believe this nation must be controlled by “us,” mercenaries put in place to keep the boots stomping on the Iraqi people’s necks, huge profits made by “Amerikan” corporations—how did we lose? After all, a lot more of “them” were killed than “us,” and the “us” were convinced that Muslims aren’t really people anyway. This looks to me like a great success.
Oh, maybe by not winning you mean that the “war” cost the 99 percent a great deal financially, that thousands in the US military died, about an equal amount in battle and the other half in suicide, with thousands more permanently damaged physically and/or psychologically. Well, that’s just silly—they were only cannon fodder to begin with, and a pretty small number were destroyed compared to a “war” where the other side actually has an actual military. Verily, most people thought this little escapade was some sort of moral quest—you know, like a holy war—a great win for the neo-lib/con media players. The real win was to prove, once again, that even those few left of the Amerikan public who have any interest in world affairs are stupefied enough to believe that even our more “intellectual” news sources, among them The Economist, the NYTimes, The New Yorker, NPR, etc., have been giving them the straight skinny.
Indeed, the Iraqi invasion was a great victory to all the citizens that matter—those proclaimed such by Citizens United.
Hello Elizabeth H,
The answer to our holy war by the people of the region and other places around the world is "blowback". A "Jihad" in other words. Just like the Crusades from the past the "Christian Invaders" will be forced to leave sometime in the future with their tails between their legs.
iraq is but one bastion of a line stretching from the indian ocean along the frontier w/ russia to the north extending south along the african continent (centcom/afcom). look at the centcom map... (http://www.centcom.mil/), the real geopolitical rationale for the iraq war/occupation was about oil and access to natural resources (oli/natural gas). the usa exerted military power to check the economic development of our global competitors (china/india/russia) by checking their long-term access (both exports and imports) to energy.
this conflict (the ongoing oil wars) continues behind the scenes in libya, afghanastan, palestine, bahrain, syria, yemen and somolia. any potential disruption of the flow of oil - is examined through the lenses of the cia and the us military (strange how david petraeus is now cia and panetta is now sec of def).
it's not a single occupation or war/conflict. it's the ongoing imperial struggle for control of the world's resources. until this corrupt government is replaced and westerners adopt a more environmentally sustainable sane lifestyle, we can expect more of the same in the future...
...peace...
IOWA: I see what you see, too. Plus there's a related analogy to the so-called Recession of 2008, as that, too, is an ongoing fiscal travesty with effects that never stopped reverberating under the surface... in the same way that BP used Cor-exit to hide the poison and oil it could not otherwise make disappear. Governance through toxic forms of smoke and mirrors has never been more apparent.
Hello Medea Benjamin and Charles Davis,
Is anyone suspicious that the withdrawn troops need time to refit and practice for the invasion of Iran. These troops and more will be necessayr if Nobel Peace Prize/War President in Chief "Obomber" can bring peace to another country starting with an "I" in the region. I think that "Obomber" needs another "piece initiative" aka war with Iran if he hopes to win the election in 2012. War seems to be the tonic for failing presidents to get a second term. I both hope and wish that he will not get a second term. His first was a disaster. I think that history will report him as one of the worst, if not the worst, to be in that office. History can be harsh that way.
USA troops not leaving - just changing their clothes and now they will be called 'contractors'.
Got this email from DNC
---------------------------------------
Democrats
Richard --
On Friday, the President announced that, by the end of the year, all servicemen and women in Iraq will be home. The war in Iraq will be over.
Watch the President's announcement -- then share this good news:
President Obama on Iraq
http://my.democrats.org/End-of-the-War-in-Iraq
As we reflect on how we arrived here, it's a time to honor the men and women who served in Iraq during the last eight years -- and be proud of our president, who kept his commitment to bring this war to an end.
Thanks,
Patrick
Patrick Gaspard
Executive Director
Democratic National Committee
--------------------------------
Sent this one back.
---------------------------------
Patrick Gaspard,
I beg your pardon, the US is being kicked out because it would not agree to Iraq's requirement to be able to prosecute US soldiers for crimes committed in Iraq we those soldier to remain there. Will Iraq be able to prosecute the mercenaries being left behind?
Thanks - Rich Smith