Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Nurses Call the Question on Obama and Global Financial Transaction Tax – Which Side are You On?
Will President Obama be the main holdout when world leaders, under growing pressure from the occupy Wall Street protests across the world and demand building for a tax on international financial transactions, meet early next month at the G-20 summit in France?
Nurses from at least four continents, including a U.S. delegation from National Nurses United, will deliver that message November 3 at the G-20 summit meeting November 3 in Cannes – urging enactment of a financial transaction tax that could raise hundreds of billions of dollars a year to heal global economies, promote sustainable development and environmental security, and strengthen quality public services.
Nurses will be joined by labor, environmental, non-governmental, and community activists who have made the push for a global FTT an international movement that has sparked the adoption of an FTT by more than a dozen nations, and prompted the European Commission to propose a global FTT which is expected to be a major topic at the G-20 summit.
The call for a FTT, sometimes called a “Robin Hood tax” (a form of such a tax was actually in place in the U.S. for most of the first half of the last century), has become a powerful force in Europe especially.
But a major stumbling block continues to be the opposition of the Obama administration, led by U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, who has personally lobbied European finance ministers to oppose an FTT despite the support for the proposal from ostensibly more conservative governments in Germany and France.
That’s one reason nurses from across the U.S. will hold a concurrent protest on November 3 on Geithner’s doorstep, with a protest outside the Treasury Department in Washington.
As the campaign for an FTT has mushroomed internationally, it remained under the radar in the U.S. until NNU helped rekindle the call for a tax on Wall Street transactions earlier this year.
NNU leaders, seeing the broadening decline in health status and living standards directly linked to the seemingly intractable economic calamity – from ailments linked to poor nutrition to patients rejecting needed medical care because of cost – reasoned that a tax on Wall Street could help raise the desperately needed revenue for such critical social needs as health care for all, jobs at living wages, full funding for quality public education, and a healthy environment.
Some major U.S. economists, and organizations including the AFL-CIO, Oxfam, Institute for Policy Studies, and Public Citizen have long supported implementation of a tax on Wall Street stocks, bonds, currencies, default swaps, and other major financial transactions that are now largely untaxed.
This past spring, NNU, with the support of labor and consumer allies, began a highly visible public campaign for the tax as a major way to make Wall Street begin to pay for reviving an economy that it crashed. They did so through reckless gambling with family mortgages, worker pensions and other misdeeds that were the prime cause of the 2008 crash and resulting crumbling conditions in Main Street communities with devastating consequences for the health and welfare of American families.
In June, NNU brought thousands of nurses and friends to the Washington headquarters of the Chamber of Commerce, Wall Street’s main lobbying arm, and to the New York Stock Exchange to sound the call for an FTT.
From July through mid-September, NNU members held multiple actions from coast to coast, including soup kitchens, health clinics, sit-ins, and street theater, culminating in a national day of action on September 1 with thousands of nurses calling on 60 Congressional offices in 21 states. NNU signs, urging “Tax Wall Street” become a highly visible banner throughout the nation.
It was just a few weeks later that tens of thousands of other Americans began their own form of protest against Wall Street’s excesses that became a prairie fire now forever known as Occupy Wall Street. Not coincidentally, many Occupy Wall Street protesters have also endorsed the call for a tax on Wall Street and the Canadian magazine Adbusters, an initiator of the proposal for the occupy protests, has also publicly urged enactment of an FTT.
Calls for an FTT now ring the airwaves, and can be found not just in obscure blogs, but in the columns of leading writers in all of the major U.S. media, such as in this commentary by Katrina vanden Heuvel in the Washington Post.
That’s one reason that reviews of a significant new book on the Obama White House, “Confidence Men” by Ron Suskind, routinely note that President Obama himself once leaned toward supporting an FTT but was dissuaded by his former top economic adviser, Larry Summers who, like Geithner, has a substantial, long term ties to Wall Street.
With the constellation of the occupy protests and the broad international movement for the FTT, the moment for achieving the tax, and the critical revenue it can provide to help revive struggling economies, has never been greater.
But only if all of us raise our voices demanding that the Obama administration support an FTT.
We need your voice as well. Join us on November 3 in Cannes or Washington D.C. Call the White House, 202-456-1111 and tell them to tax Wall Street financial transactions and get on the side of Main Street not Wall Street. Learn more about our campaign at www.mainstreetcontract.org.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


15 Comments so far
Show AllNice try, but, from the start of his 2008 campaign, Obama, by his massive campaign bribes from Wall Street (he got more than John McCain), his appointment of Wall Street hacks as his economic advisors, and then his continued bailout of Wall Street "banks" while doing too little for Main Street, has already clearly shown which side he is on: the same side as his Republican "opponents": the Wall Street/Corporate/Warmonger side.
The U.S. economic/political system is rigged so that only Wall Street/Corporate/Warmonger-approved Democrats and Republicans are allowed to run for President and Congress.
Since Obama's initial response to OWS was to sign three more NAFTAs why would anybody bother calling the White House ?
Just to make sure I understand this. The OWS protestors are protesting TBTF banks and a corrupt financial system managed by the Federal Reserve. So, the answer is to centralize power even more in a global bank which will lead to global TBTF banks and even more consolidation of wealth and power. The logic of progressives is very hard to understand sometimes. Wouldn't a better way to protest unelected rich powerful elite financial groups be to demand more transparency and democracy instead of less? This tax will punish the smalltime speculator but it will greatly increase the power of the elite or the 1%. The United States will now have part of its economy managed by the same people who are in charge of the WTO and IMF. Is that really what OWS protestors would want? I thought they protested those organizations. Why would they want to give them even more power? It makes no sense.
Respectfully ask for clarification here, as I sure do not see how you got this.
I pay taxes on everything I buy. So...a tax on financial purchases sounds pretty fair to me. I would think that this tax would go to the government of the country in which it is applied, not to a central bank??
No, that would be fair, you're correct. That is not what they are saying. It would be a global bank run by people like the World Bank, IMF and WTO. For instance, people like ex-Goldman Sachs executives who work at these organizations.
Hey, Will ...
Apparently the article you're referring to was edited or otherwise modified before I was able to read it here. Having gone back through it a second time and unable to locate a reference to this "global bank run by people like the World Bank, IMF and WTO", I would respectfully ask you to provide a link or citation to that information.
Because I'm certain you wouldn't want other readers here to erroneously believe you might be obfuscating.
I posted a big comment below. Here is more to make sense of this.
This is one proposal:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let_Wall_Street_Pay_for_the_Restoration_of_Main_Street_Bill
That proposal is for a tax by the US government and collected by the US government. But this Robin Hood Tax is a GLOBAL tax and it isn't clear who would collect the taxes. It seems like the IMF or World Bank or a new global bank of some kind. I think it's important to be clear about the difference between these proposals because they are VERY different. Why do we need a global tax, why not keep all the money right here in the US? Why not support DeFazio's proposal? I'm libertarian but I recognize some big tax schemes are much worse than others and some might even be fair. DeFazio's proposal is much better than this global tax idea.
Will C., do you work for the Obama administration? Are you purposely trying to put out misinformation? National Nurses United "called for a Wall Street financial transaction tax (FTT) to pay the Main Street reforms needed to heal America."
It's the same old issue. I'm being sarcastic. I know the answer to my questions. Progressives think they can reform big centralized institutions like the IMF just like they think they can reform the federal government. So they protest the institution at the same time they support it.
This is also called the Tobin Tax. Progressives have wanted it for a long time. It's a very Keynesian idea. Economists like Krugman love it. I'm more libertarian. In my comment I'm just pointing out the irony that in this case the progressives are proving their hypocrisy because they protest and oppose the IMF and World Bank so much. It isn't as obvious when they support Keynesian policies domestically because they don't protest or oppose the Federal Reserve. With a global scheme like this if they support the Keynesian agenda they have to support the IMF and World Bank and it becomes obvious that they have some big contradictions in their politics.
Here is a quote from Tobin:
"It would be an internationally agreed uniform tax, administered by each government over its own jurisdiction. The tax proceeds could appropriately be paid into the IMF or World Bank."
Just google Tobin Tax or Robin Hood Tax and IMF or World Bank to read some more. This is a global tax collected by a global bank. A lot of the US money would be used for other countries not for the US. People like the World Bank and IMF would be managing the money.
Another important point that isn't being mentioned is that one of the reasons that this has been proposed is not to help the poor but to have funds to bailout banks:
Global bank tax urged by IMF
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2010/04/21/bank-tax-imf-g20-robin-hood.html
"Countries should consider imposing a two-pronged tax on banks and other financial firms to pay for bailouts the next time markets tank, the world's financial body is proposing."
What that means is they are taxing speculators to bailout banks. I guess someone could consider that fair but I think it's important to recognize that this isn't just about taxing the financial industry to bail out Main Street, it is about taxing them to bail out themselves. And of course it's possible this is just the start of the scheme and that eventually Main Street might end up holding the bag like with the bailout of our banks domestically or with the poor countries the IMF claims to be helping.
Will C., at least be honest and just state that YOU don't want any new tax, even (and probably especially) if it is for the common good. There are so many blatantly false comments about "progressives" that it just points out your comments aren't worth reading.
Really, Will, why not just come right out and say what you really believe in: no taxes at ALL, at least for people above a certain income level. Right? No income tax, no sales tax, and no property tax. CERTAINLY no FICA taxes, and no financial transaction taxes.
I wonder how the roads, bridges, police, fire fighters, interstate system, U.S. military, postal service, highway patrol, etc, etc, etc, will be paid for without any taxes at all?? Hmmmm.....sounds to me like you want utter chaos and anarchy and a breakdown of civilization. I call that treason. But then, all Capitalists like yourself are traitors. Just legalized traitors - - - - -for now.
What makes anyone, even nurses, think that o the traitor will cave into their demands. Just the opposite as o has demonstrated will happen. What could help will be quickly quashed. So much and so goes the corporate mulatto.
The Nurses Union and the Occupy Movement are very different. Her Union choose not to strike in Wisconsin and they got hammered. That loss affected the rest of us as well. We welcome them but not as a union but as INDIVIDUALS participating in the OCW movement.
As for the transaction tax it is a very worthy effort.
A tax plan I can support... THE ZERO TO 99% TAX PLAN. No tax on income below $88,000. A progressive tax from $88,000 to $1,000,000. A 99% tax on ALL income above $1,000,000 - including earned and unearned from investment.
KEEP IT SIMPLE. KEEP IT FAIR. NO LOOP HOLES. NO DEDUCTIONS.
It seems pretty clear that the only bills our government (Repubs & Dems) will support are either "bankster, welfare theft programs" or "job outsourcing programs via more destructive trade agreements". ..........Get ready for the big crash that's coming our way; one that will dwarf the Great Depression. You can be sure there will be NO notice given to "we the people" so we can prepare for it. Get your house in order, now.