Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
How Low Will AT&T Go?
Rev. R. Henry Martin directs the Shreveport-Bossier Rescue Mission, a Louisiana-based ministry that “reaches out to feed, clothe, shelter and provide healing services to homeless men, women and families with children.” The ministry aided 1,200 people in 2010, served over 135,000 meals and is open to those in need 365 days a year.
This is all noble work, but what the heck does it have to do with the AT&T/T-Mobile merger?
The answer, of course, is absolutely nothing. So why did Rev. Martin feel compelled to write a letter to the FCC urging it to approve the takeover?
According to a Center for Public Integrity report released on Monday, at least two dozen charities that received AT&T bucks have plugged the merger, writing letters urging the FCC to seal the deal. The Shreveport-Bossier Rescue Mission, for one, raked in $50,000 from AT&T earlier this year. Perhaps it was that cash infusion that inspired this heartfelt testimonial:
“It is important that we, as Christians, never stop working on behalf of the underserved and forgotten,” Rev. Martin wrote in a June letter to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski. “It might seem like an out-of-place endorsement, but I am writing today in order to convey our support for the AT&T/T-Mobile merger. … People often call on God to help the outcasts and downtrodden that walk among us. Sometimes, however, it is our responsibility to take matters into their own hands. Please support this merger.”
What a merger that would result in 20,000 lost jobs, jacked-up fees and the destruction of competition in the wireless market has to do with God’s work is anyone’s guess.
Other recipients of AT&T money that backed the deal include the American Foundation for the Blind ($10,000 to $15,000 per year), the National Disability Institute ($50,000) and the United Way of Northwest Florida (an average of $22,157 per year since 2007).
While it’s hard to say whether AT&T engaged in a literal quid pro quo with these nonprofits, the CPI report does note that the company at least approached many of these organizations about writing letters to the FCC.
Angela Patton is the sole employee of Camp Diva, a Richmond, Va.-based nonprofit that sends inner-city girls to summer camp and runs afterschool programs. She told CPI that an AT&T official who handles donations to Camp Diva told her “they were interested to see what our opinions were [about the merger] and could we be of support.” Patton told CPI that Camp Diva is “suffering” and needs AT&T’s support.
AT&T has been playing this game of “I’ll scratch your back if you’ll scratch mine” since announcing the merger in March. Key to its efforts has been Jim Cicconi, the company’s chief lobbyist —who also runs AT&T’s charitable foundation. This blurring between church and state, as it were, has allowed AT&T to strategically target its contributions.
“They have curried favor with organizations who, whether through direct or indirect expectations, will go to bat for them,” Ellen Miller, executive director of the Sunlight Foundation, told the Washington Post’s Cecilia Kang in May. “That’s what a sophisticated lobby does, and AT&T is among the top of this in Washington.”
Corporate abuses shock no one at this point. But what makes the CPI report especially disturbing is how dependent many of these charitable groups are on AT&T for their very existence.
Camp Diva isn’t the only AT&T recipient that’s fighting to stay afloat. The Boys & Girls Club in Neshoba County, Miss., is in a district with a 24.2 percent poverty rate and a median household income of $29,835. Volunteer Rae Ellen Gordon wrote to the FCC on behalf of her organization. “If I was asked to write a letter it would have to be something I would believe in,” Gordon told CPI. “We’re still very new, we’re still struggling financially.”
Indeed, it’s striking how many of these AT&T recipients — including the Boys & Girls Club of El Dorado County, Calif., and the Delta Arts Alliance on the Mississippi coast — are based in regions plagued with poverty and high unemployment. These organizations undoubtedly felt they were in no position to bite the hand that feeds them — and AT&T knew that.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



13 Comments so far
Show AllThis should read "How low will American Corporations go." IMHO as far as I can see most large corporations are just crime rackets that at best deliberately mislead, and at worse actually break the law.
As an example of misleading I had a family member turn 65 this year. She was inundated with very legitimate looking applications for insurance that on the surface appeared to be from the government telling here she needed to sign up for her government Medicare benefits. Only after carefully reading them did you realize they were was just some private company trying to trick you into signing up with them.
As far as the criminal aspect goes just look at the financial wide mortgage scandal. Large numbers of big corporations lent money to people they knew couldn't pay it back, and they didn't care because they knew they wouldn't be holding the mortgages. The crap mortgages were securitized then rated AAA by all three credit agencies, then sold to pension funds and countries around the world. FRAUD, FRAUD, FRAUD, FRAUD, FRAUD, FRAUD, on so many different levels, by so many people and almost no one went to jail. Nope we got Obama, the pied piper of financial cronyism saying that there were no laws broken.
To show just how bad things have gotten Democracy Now had a former Reagan regulator on today saying how lax Obama is on regulation and how when he was a regulator his office reported 10,000 acts of fraud to FBI for investigation, while Obama has done NONE. Yup a Republican saying Obama is not going after Wall Street enough, how far we have fallen.
Both because I am now over 55, and because I live in the house formerly occupied by my elderly parents, I often get the "legitimate looking" mail you describe.
It really is a crying shame, and at best a sharp practice that carefully pushes the envelope separating legal conduct from felonious fraud.
Since my brain cells are still more or less in working order, I can spot the bogus mailings and often find them grimly amusing because to me, they're obvious scams.
Whether insurance schemes or requests for donations from "charitable organizations", they're crafted almost as parodies of legitimate correspondence-- except that legitimate companies or charities don't even send out old-fashioned notices like the fake ones any more because they've become so discredited.
The sleaze merchants have perfected the art of Official-Looking formatting and style, from phony embossing and seals to decorative blurbs about Important Deadlines.
In her declining years, my mother had the sense to at least set aside this kind of mail and ask me or my siblings to look at it when we visited to see if it really was important. It never was; it was always one predatory scheme or another.
When we went through mom's papers after her death, we found bundles of this kind of mail neatly set aside because it seemed "important".
There oughta be a law, but it seems that there's either no way-- or, as likely, no political will-- to shield gullible, trusting, and vulnerable seniors with limited or declining critical faculties from such monstrous predation.
excuse me, I maybe slightly off topics...
This reminds me of "missionary" who went into deep Africa to converts the black, to save their souls and later sold as the slaves in the New World. Christopher Columbus discovers the New World and with the Priests they plunder and killed for Spain. China will soon have the largest Christian's population in the world. This is from BBC World Services. Thinking to myself, man there will be even more killing, more than Tienanmen Square, Stalin and Mao Zedong.” The Christians will win as history repeats itself.
gods damn it, Blah!
The corporatization of charities has been going on for a long time. If anyone thinks that the Susan B. Komen walk for the cure is anything other than a corporate charity think again. Same with National Breast Cancer Foundation, United Way and the ubiquitous Red Cross, that takes a healthy chunk of the donations that occur after every disaster (ref Haiti - where did all that money go?). Charity is big business, we should all be looking at where our charitable donations go, what the percentage of donations actually helps those in need.
Speaking of Susan B. Komen, check out a tangential comment I posted in a previous life-- on June 13, 2008, to be exact:
__________________
With all due respect: Last year I pushed aside the Susan G. Komen Memorial pink Campbell's Soup cans in my kitchen cabinet to get honey for my Susan G. Komen Memorial cereal. Since I was still a bit hungry, I then had a Susan G. Komen Memorial Thomas' English Muffin with some Susan G. Komen Memorial Philadelphia Brand Cream Cheese and Susan G. Komen Memorial Smuckers Strawberry jam.
Later on my doorbell rang, and when I got to the door I saw the UPS truck pulling away. But it left behind the digital TV USB gizmo I'd ordered from Tiger Technologies-- packaged in a pink Susan G. Komen Memorial carton.
And I thought to myself: enough. Isn't it time to let poor Susan G. Komen rest in peace?
Because, frankly, she's starting to get on my nerves. And that isn't fair to either of us.
Gifts given with 'strings attached' are called bribes.
I work for AT&T.
Get this - they have stated (on internal news pages) that if the merger goes through, they'll bring back 5000 call center jobs.
Got that? Bring back.
Which means that they offshored them in the first place.
And the implied threat is.... no merger, no bringback.
And that's not to mention the 10,000+ high-end, high-pay tech jobs which they've already offshored to India. That offshoring continues unabated.
How many American families have been permanently ruined by all this? Maybe the nonprofits can help them....
That's some corporate citizen, eh?
Sarcasm on:
Aren't you being awfully hard on our "job creators"?
Sarcasm off.
There is a lot more going on behind the scenes than a paltry $50k. It has more to do with bribing members of a 'hard luck' charity to pretend that att is deserving of their real intentions, crushing the competition and dominating it. Having such obscure people 'supporting' an 'att' is pure conspiracy for want of a worse descriptive.
And I doubt the 'bring back' of 5000 jobs is very paramount considering what those returned jobs will pay, which I say will be less than when they left these shores. Can't help but think of some kind of extortion or flimflamming going on here because a corporation doesn't really do something for small favors in return and att is looking to grow.
It seems obvious that in order to go lower they would have to pay.... us.
This story poses a good question. Another good question is how low Verizon will go?
See the text below and support as desired-- thanks.
Tell Verizon to stop selling our personal data.
Share this action on Facebook
Share this action on Twitter
Big Brother is here, and his name is Verizon. This company is now selling information about you to other companies -- information including your recent online activity, web browsing history, purchases made, gender, age, interests, and physical location via GPS.
Verizon spends millions on corporate propaganda, but they "forgot" to advertise this policy change. Now it's up to us to spread the word.
SIGN OUR PETITION: Tell Verizon to reverse their spying policy and forward this email far and wide.
Verizon says that you can opt out of having this data shared, but opting out is not an acceptable practice when it comes to privacy. The standard until now has been to require that people opt in before their information is shared. If Verizon succeeds, it seems inevitable that other wireless and Internet companies will follow their path to make a buck off you.
Verizon claims that its policy of selling information about you to other companies will not disclose your identity, but anonymity protections are often breached.
Sign on now to demand this policy be reversed.
We will be sharing this petition with our friends in Occupy movements around the country, many of whom are located near Verizon offices.
Sincerely,
Aimee, David, Sarah
and the RootsAction team
P.S. Our small staff is supported by contributions from people like you; your donations are greatly appreciated.
References:
1. Important notice about how Verizon Wireless uses information.
2. Verizon Wireless to Sell Customers' Data to Advertisers.
This is a joint project of RootsAction and Demand Progress. By signing this letter you are joining both organization's email lists.
Hmmm
The old saw about money talks and Bull*hit walking applies. Taken one step further might makes right." Money and might makes everything right". People the working class does the work and hands the money over to the bankers.
Do we do it because we want to? No we do it because we never are given a choice.
Does anyone honestly think that the distribution of income and power is any less skewed now than it was in 12th century England with Robin Hood trying to give back to the farmers the money stolen by the crown? The game is exactly the same. The distribution of income and power is the same. And the outcomes are the same........
Talk about whoring for the cause! I am not sure it's AT&T going low. These "non-profits" must find it worthwhile.