Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- Senate Votes to Extend Sweeping Bush Era Surveillance Powers
- Six Weeks After Reelection, Obama Sells Out Liberal Democrats
- The Only Way Left to Beat GOP Fanatics: Call Their Bluff and Go Over the Fabricated "Cliff"
- The Financial Elite's War Against the US Economy
- New Year’s Revolution: Connecting the Dots, Coming Together and Fighting Like Hell
- Six Weeks After Reelection, Obama Sells Out Liberal Democrats
- The Financial Elite's War Against the US Economy
- Revealed: How the FBI Coordinated the Crackdown on Occupy
- Senate Votes to Extend Sweeping Bush Era Surveillance Powers
- New Year’s Revolution: Connecting the Dots, Coming Together and Fighting Like Hell
Popular content
Today's Top News
High Schoolers Heart Free Speech
As millions of Facebook and Twitter users know, the Internet, more than any other medium, is dominated by the speech of billions.
This has become a cliché but it’s true: The Internet is the greatest gift to free speech since the printing press.
High schoolers who use social media have a greater appreciation for free speech than those who do not. (Photo via (cc) Flickr user hackNY)
Now, the Knight Foundation’s new study of high schoolers’ social media use confirms the role social media has played in this explosion of expression.
“This is the first generation in history that can text, tweet and blog to the whole world — it’s great news that their support is growing for the freedoms that let them do it,” Eric Newton, senior adviser to the president of the Knight Foundation, writes in the report.
The study says that high school students who actively use social media sites have a greater “appreciation of the First Amendment” than those who don’t. It turns out that people who express themselves freely are far more likely to appreciate the right to free speech. The study notes that “fully 91 percent of students who use social networking daily to get news and information agree that ‘people should be allowed to express unpopular opinions.’ But only 77 percent of those who never use social networks to get news agree that unpopular opinions should be allowed.”
This means that privately run sites like Facebook — which the paper repeatedly refers to, given that it boasts more than 750 million users — have an overwhelming duty to protect the right of expression for their users. And judging from its continuing missteps on privacy and its willingness to arbitrarily shut down the pages of controversial groups, Facebook has left a lot of room for improvement.
That responsibility was made real earlier this year when Egyptian protesters, organized in part on Facebook, overturned the rule of Hosni Mubarak. Now, as the Occupy Wall Street movement builds and spreads to other cities across the country — in part because of its participants’ social-networking savvy — Facebook, Twitter and other social sites will have to come to terms with their central role as platforms of speech, and find a way to balance their business interests with their users’ democratic impulses.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


8 Comments so far
Show AllI hope these kids have read IRON HEEL by Jack london: "You have forgotten the editors. They draw their salaries for the policy that they maintain. Their policy is to print nothing that is a vital menace to the established. The press in the United States? It is a parasitic growth that battens on the capitalist class. Its function is to serve the established by moulding public opinion, and right well it serves it.”
Hoa binh
There was a time in our public education system when Thoreau was required reading.
They have not read London or Thoreau. The time when real education employed the study of literature is long gone. I was astonished to read course titles at our State university at the suggestion of a friend. Liberal Arts education has indeed mostly been eradicated. Secondary educastion is little better.
The more I look, the more I cease to wonder at the pitiful level of education our "graduates" at every level are attaini9ng.
From what I've heard from my students, daughter and her friends, high school students are assigned a few novels, then given worksheets that spell out the theme and such. "This is what this novel means. Take note: you must know this for the test." If they have to write an essay, the students generally Sparknote. I've never heard of a single case of disciplining a high school student in my district for plagiarism.
The university I work at has no requirements for literature classes, unless your major is English. The freshman English department doesn't use literature in their readings.
In other words, students can now get a college degree without ever really reading a decent piece of literature. By the way, have you ever read the textbooks our students are required to buy at ridiculous expense? This might put you in total despair.
Literature departments were fostered in the early twentieth century as a replacement for the ethical reflection of religion (at its best), and again after WWII as a bulwark against fascism. They were being squeezed hard in the seventies, in my youth. Is it any wonder that at this point, most believe that education is all about getting the skills to get a job, certainly not about reflection on the human condition, for which literature is irreplaceable. Instead, we have the largely sterile, numerically driven means of psychology.
I think your posting is right on the money. Social media cannot get things done, they can only assist. They can help organize, but they can't build anything.
I think something that most people, old or young, do not realize how info is used today. Once you establish a Facebook and/or Twitter account, every conversation and picture you post becomes public record that can be seen by whomever(?) wishes. Don't be naive to believe any 'privacy' settings are effective. Google has shown total disregard for user's privacy by saving EVERYTHING you search and websites you visit. We all know Google isn't the only company doing this. Think about that seriously. If that doesn't frighten you, I don't know what will. I'm not saying it's all bad. However, when I see 2 people having dinner and 1 person sits there texting while the other person looks around the room blankly, I wish cell phones didn't exist. By the way, I am not some anti-tech person. Cell phone use has just gotten out of control.
IB
listen... it's easy. forget about your god given christian name - find an alias of sorts
iowa blackbird@facebook.com - then enjoy sharing and listening to divergent political commentary. also, don't use the text application (cell phone) and your whereabouts can remain anonymous.. .everything is relative.
...peace...