EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Punching a Hole in Bubbles of Denial and Addiction: Late Capitalism and Its Discontents of the American Autumn
The global designs of the neo-liberal agenda have met the living architecture of a larger order -- a portion of which has taken the form of a still coalescing, yet potent, countervailing consciousness, a global-wide Liberty Plaza of the mind -- an order that is not informed by corporate era public relations legerdemain, hyper-adrenaline media sound bites, rightwing emotional displacements, or "sensible" centrist platitudes -- but the type of order that begins to jell when the structures of an existing system lose touch with the realities of daily life.
A ground-level, global-wide movement is afoot and has announced to the economic, media and political elite that they are on to their schemes. Accordingly, the plundering class and their protectors will no longer be afforded the luxury of insulating themselves (almost absent confrontation) within bubbles of privilege, bubbles of denial, bubbles of insularity.
Late capitalism has proven to be wholly reliant upon, in fact, addicted to, the creation of bubbles: market and media bubbles, respectively, serving to create inflated wealth and the manufacturing of closed narratives that shield the privileged players within from being held accountable for the consequences of their schemes.
The system is analogous to a rigged game in a tawdry, traveling carnival. The carnival barker's success hinges on whether or not his audience is seduced by his unctuous pitch, in this case being the dubious claim that, under late capitalism, illusionary economic success is attainable by pluck and perseverance. ("Step right up, folks, all can play"-- but the house will win.) Of course, the game has been rigged from the get-go, has been designed to fleece credulous rubes who have never glimpsed the larger world, and, when any prize at all is won, it is a piece of cheap, disposable consumer junk.
As Autumn stands before us, it will be helpful to allow illusions to fall away like dying leaves. Summer is kind to fools, but winter insists on clarity. Let the old delusions blaze out in Autumnal splendor, and then be mindful of winter's stark perfection…its demarcations…rendering bare branches against a bleak sky.
Know this: The illusions of the corporate empire can no longer provide shelter; the elite and operatives of economic imperium can no longer raid and plunder the easy pickings of summer…hoard and squander its bounty. Therefore, to quote the poet, at present, "One must have a mind of winter" to navigate the white-out winds of new realities.
One must have a mind of winter
To regard the frost and the boughs
Of the pine-trees crusted with snow;
And have been cold a long time
To behold the junipers shagged with ice,
The spruces rough in the distant glitter
Of the January sun; and not to think
Of any misery in the sound of the wind […]
-- Wallace Stevens, excerpt from The Snow Man
Yet, with the rise of that wing of the privileged class known as the corporate media, we receive the opposite; instead, we are enveloped within a hothouse bloom of hype, surface-level, adrenaline-activating content bearing misleadingly narrowed context.
On January 17 1991, at the start of the U.S.'s formal military hostilities against Iraq in the first Gulf War, the "folk rapper"/performance poet Chris Chandler and I were in Lafayette Park across the street from the White House. Chris pounded and thrashed at his battered guitar and recited talking blues protest ditties that we composed on the spot.
We were among a crowd of well over a couple of thousand demonstrators, plus scores of homeless people shared the surroundings as well. Shortly after the bombing of Iraq began, many in the park joined in an impromptu march around the metro D.C. area where thousands more protesters joined our ranks.
As we wended our way back to Pennsylvania Avenue, we were met, a block from the White House, by a phalanx of police i.e., full riot gear-clad storm troopers and mounted sons-of-bitches on horseback who charged the crowd.
The following is a close approximation of the account of the events as reported in the next day's Washington Post:
"A few dozen ragged protesters hobbled up Pennsylvania Ave. throwing rocks and taunting the police…"
Bearing that in mind, here is the opening graph of the account of the events on the Brooklyn Bridge, where on Sunday, Oct 2, 2011, demonstrators were herded, kettled and arrested by police:
"NEW YORK (AP) — More than 700 protesters demonstrating against corporate greed, global warming and social inequality, among other grievances, were arrested Saturday after they swarmed the Brooklyn Bridge and shut down a lane of traffic for several hours in a tense confrontation with police."
Buyer beware: If the corporate press reports a breaking story with any degree of accuracy, the act is to be viewed as a fluke and certainly not as an act of honest intention by the reporters, producers and editors involved. On a personal basis, I have yet to be part of an unfolding news story in which the version of events created by these courtesans to power do not seem simply cut out of whole cloth, as they truckled to create an inoffensive narrative for the ruling elite.
"Now, from America, empty indifferent things are pouring across, sham things, dummy life…. A house, in the American sense, an American apple or a grapevine over there, has nothing in common with the house, the fruit, the grape into which went the hopes and reflections of our forefathers … Live things, things that are alive — that are conscious of us — are running out and can no longer be replaced. We are perhaps the last to have known such things."–Rainer Maria Rilke
Living in New York City, as I do, brings into stark relief the fact that the city operates as a defacto banana republic/police state. In the same manner that the mission of the police force is to protect the power and privilege of the moneyed classes, mainstream journalists work within the boundaries of its acceptable narratives for the purpose of job security and a bit of privilege.
The general population, buffeted by economic insecurity, at least, up to this point, has remained docile, and, to mitigate the anxiety and depression caused by feelings of powerlessness, many have become addicted to the small perks and bribes and endless distractions of the corporate/consumer state.
photo: Harrie van Veen
Furthermore, these bubble-enclosed states of being constitute addiction in a literal sense: Ergo, the compulsive mechanisms of addictive behavior are an attempt to ease an individual's abiding sense of powerlessness and the attendant feelings of anxiety and despair experienced in the midst of uncontrollable circumstances and to quell troubling, obsessive thoughts and feelings of acute emotional discomfort by an habitual reliance on mood altering substances such as alcohol, food, gambling, work, hoarding, lust for power, wealth and privilege.
Addictive actions arise from the drive of libido, but its energy is usurped and exploited by the relentless will of a rigid, turned in on itself ego..."Self will run riot," as the Big Book of Alcoholics Anonymous poetically puts it.
Addiction is a pathology of the mechanistic mind; an addict’s disregard for his own body and his exploitative attitude towards the world at large is a microcosmic version of the economic designs of the global economic elite. Apropos, the world is mine to abuse, not to engage...to exploit from within a protective bubble of privilege and entitlement, not to be enjoined with in common communion.
The demands of the addicted mind are analogous to that of a bratty child, a high chair tyrant, "his majesty the baby," who is convinced that his wants are the end all be all of all things. Therefore, a childish addict must grow up and ask himself this question: How do I transform my obsessive wants into the rage of my dharma, my un-reflective compulsions into the steady work of my soul.
In our time, when nearly all the apparatus of the corporate/consumer state exist and are maintained by the demeaning, soul-defying dynamics of addiction, as an act of defiance, one should attempt to get drunk on clarity--which is a different matter than a priggish, "dry drunk's" hyper-moralistic refusal of excess, for the primary option does not constitute a puritanical refusal of the world--but, instead, is an embrace of the sacred quality of life, a respect for the finite quality of our fleeting passage through this life.
The voice of addiction (both internal and extant in the consumer state) will say anything and will go to craven lengths to continue on. Withal, its narrative will insist its path is the only passage possible…that its doomed trajectory must be maintained. And when its flimsy, desperate arrangements do collapse, it will insist that it must be propped back up so it can topple once again (or as this destructive act of enabling was called, a few years back, "The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008").
Let the stock market hit bottom and allow "consumer confidence" to plummet…allow the psyches' of consumers, addicted to distraction, to spiral into the abyss. Because, in so doing, one may be compelled to find and grasp onto one's essential self, as the persona of one's false self, addicted to the present order, disappears into the void.
To truly embrace the possibility of change, it is essential to allow putrefied habits to compost into the rich loam that will nourish reborn understandings. Apropos:
I felt a Funeral in my Brain
And Mourners to and fro
Kept treading--treading-till it
seemed That Sense was breaking through"
--Emily Dickinson, opening stanza from, I Felt A Funeral In My Brain
Yes, this is a grievous event…a time of tears, confusion and lamination. Yet:
Let the young tears come
Let the calm hand of grief come
It is not as evil as you think.
--Rolf Jacobsen, excerpt from Sunflower
Within the present societal structure of the corporate state, "learned helplessness" is encouraged (as opposed to embracing reflective sorrow and deploying focused rage). Because it sustains itself by exploiting an individual's instinctual drives and human longings, the present order of late capitalism is depended upon allowing an individual to possess just enough libido to vampirize--but not to retain enough élan vital to be roused to rebellion against the corporate state's relentless practices of economic coercion.
"In a consumer society there are inevitably two kinds of slaves: the prisoners of addiction and the prisoners of envy" --Ivan Illich
I have noticed that often what is (unconsciously) beneath paranoia is envy. Envy…that others are taking up one's space in the world and are plotting to maintain the arrangement. Solution: Punch a hole in bubbles of denial and addiction and take a look for yourself. Insist on your portion of life -- your portion of fate.
Many situations in this life are rigged e.g., the gamed system of the corporate state. But life itself is too vast, too intricate to be rigged; it is truly too big to fail. Now: To the streets, glistening with renewing rain…to the flaming barricades…its flames caress the future. Come out of self-exile; you are the change you can believe in.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



50 Comments so far
Show AllI'm there, having tossed my addiction into the wind, a slave never again.
Philosopher bard indeed.
Until enough Americans punch a hole in supply side (also called trickle-down)economics and stomp it to death everytime it attempts to re-emerge, no progressive change will occur.
Obama's 2008 campaign speeches were chock full of supply-side ideas, just as his presidential speeches are. Unfortunately, too many Obama supporters ignored or denied his core values and continue to do so.
Hey ray, are you replying to my comment or just like seeing your name at the top of the thread? Is it ego or vanity?
There are two choices;
reply and comment.
A Day In A Dying Empire
by Phil Rockstroh
http://philrockstroh.com/2010/07/02/a-day-in-a-dying-empire-an-intimate-fable-on-current-events
...I began to mutter, “awful.”
“Awful. Awful. Awful.”
Then I chanted it aloud, “Awful. Awful. Awful.”
Then and there, I decided I would make “awful” my morning and evening prayer.
“He’s awful, She’s awful — This food is awful — The news is awful — Our leaders are awful. You awful people have created such an awful mess by living out the awful implications of your awful lives that all mirrors should be renamed awful frames..."
He's awful good, isn't he?
I just wanted to post it at the top of the page...
I hope that the Occupy Wall St. movement swells into something that permanently changes our national debate. But I have doubts. Just as the MSM reports are crafted to be acceptable to the people who own American, the movement risks becoming just another Tea Party that wallows in self pity. Stop whining about the police. They are not part of the 1%. Stop denigrating the Tea Party. They are not part of the 1%. Instead, reach out to ALL of the 99%, especially the people who sympathize with the Tea Party. That movement was born from the same discontent that gave rise to Occupy Wall St. You don't need to agree about everything. But I think there are many issues where agreement exists or can be fostered. Both groups question the bailouts and too big to fail. Both groups question our interventionist foreign policy. Both groups want to see more jobs. I understand that a coalition of left and right wing populists might be contentious, but that is better than the usual assortment of DINOs and RINOs who cater to the 1%. So tone down the revolutionary rhetoric and talk about the really basic things people want like a reasonable level of security, enough freedom to choose their own way and meaningful jobs.
You can't reach out to the police that is in service of the 1%; you can't reach out to the Tea Party that is bought and paid by the 1%. Of course there aren't a part of it, not even their real allies, just servants - but they themselves have to come to that realisation first. You can help and teach individuals, but the police, the tea party, much of business etc are structural tools of the 1% and individuals have to distance themselves from these first, come to the realisation that they are indeed part of the overwhelming majority, and not the superior minority, the elite.
It is not possible to reach out to police as it is, or to the TP, or to the Democratic Party fwiw etc etc. You can reach out to ex-policement, ex-tea partiers, ex-corporate shills - not while they still serve power, but after they realised they don't want to serve it any more. You can't play for both sides.
Your comments then imply that the Occupy Wall St. movement cannot claim the 99% title they cherish. Only if you are willing to listen and speak to all of the 99% on their own terms can you claim that title and win your objectives. Just try going out to some of the Tea Party Boards and posting some comments that use their own talking points to compare the two groups and by no means should you engage in any of the baiting and name calling that goes on there. Some of those folks are in the Tea Party ranks simply because they became a national force first. At this point fewer than 30% associate themselves with the Tea Party, but I suspect a third or more of them could be drawn into the Occupy movement if we can refrain from casting aspersions at them or using language that triggers a negative reaction. Keep up the divisive language and the Organize movement might match the 30% support of the Tea Party. Then the supporters of the status quo can play them off against each other and keep the spirit of populism from winning.
I actually do not think the 99% claim is correct, 95% or something like that would be more accurate of course. No idea if the concrete number is important or not though, but I don't think it really is.
The point I tried to make, probably not very well, is that reality overrides wishes. There are groups, concentrations of power and interest, that are in fact working for the 1% and that can not truly ally themselves with OWS. It doesn't mean that individuals from these groups can not do so, but as groups the police and the Tea Party, as they exist at this moment, can not be allies of OWS. Thinking otherwise is imo very naive, similar to the Egyptian stuff where protesters (at first) focused too much on the person of Mubarak and not the underlying military power, even thinking the army was an ally. Some (or even a significant number or even a majority) of the soldiers may be friendly to the protesters, but that doesn't matter much unless they consciously recognise this and reorganise their relationship to the army. In other words, if they get the order to shoot, they have to rebel, because the army, as it is, is no friend of the people. Whether they secretly agree with people they're shooting or not is a matter of very minor importance - what matters is whether they shoot. This is of course a more extreme example (at this time at least), but I think a good parallel. Actual real world alignment of interests is not enough - people have to actually work together, and for that, they must recognise and reorganise their relationship to organs of state and capitalist power - for example the police and the Tea Party. It doesn't matter whether a policeman agrees with the protesters, if he's not willing to put down his shield and helmet and stand against his colleagues. It doesn't matter that the real interests of Tea Partiers and OWS people are in alignment - unless TP people realise that they are being fed lies and are just a propaganda tool for the "1%" and are willing to act against it. As groups, they clearly can never be allies with any reasonably democratic popular organisation.
I hear your argument a lot, including at our own general assemblies in my town. Last night, we had a statement put forth for assembly approval from the marginalized commmmunity/diversity working group that used the word "capitalism" in a not-so complimentary way. This brought forward a number of of objectors (all young males who I have never seen before in my years involved in activism) asking that any statement that assigns blame for our conditions on the unqualified word "capitalism" (or any other "socialistic-sounding" wording) be stricken from the statement. They insisted that it would be scare off a lot of would be members to the movement. They proposed a block the proposal, but support for the block got only perhaps five hands raised (out of about 300 attendees). The call for consensus to approve the statement as-is was then made. The statement was approved by an overwhelming majority and loud applause.
Based on my experience, driven home by the events last night, I think this argument (by what ends up being from a small minority) that the Occupy Movement has to tone down what they call our "socialist" or "marxist" and sometimes even "communist" rhetoric has no merit. This call for all-inclusivity of viewpoints into the movement seems to have little merit also.
Firstly, it is exactly the philosophy of the Tea Party, and Ayn Rand "Libertarians" that has put us in this boat. How can one embrace into a movement adherents of the very philosophy that created the conditions we are protesting about? I am confident that many of them are already in the process of re-examining their beliefs, and will join us under a strong-left economic-political message.
Secondly, consider that the US Right did not achieve it's stunning successes by watering down it's message so as to be palatable to their opponents. They put forth uncompromising rhetoric appealing to the worst angels of the US public's nature - backed by a corporate media that allows no other narrative except the highly wishy-washy equivocating one of the liberals and Democrats. But just like our general assembly last night, a great, quiet majority of the dissatisfied US public knows exactly what the hell is going on, and not only do they _not_ mind socialist rhetoric - they find it positively refreshing and galvanizing, becasue it distills what they have come to believe, or more often, always believed, but are afraid to express becasue they never hear their narrative in our corporate media-driven popular discourse.
Spot on, great post and pretty inspiring story :-)
Furthermore, socialist and especially Marxist analysis is at this moment (despite its shortcomings) the only time-tested way of analysis that has explanations and historical predictions that work, because it is, even if not the complete truth, the only approach that is based on truth and reality. "Class war" is part of reality. Globalisation of finance capital is part of reality. The first book of Capital could be written today - just not in England but in China. Baran's and Sweezy's Monopoly Capital would be the same if written today, everything it said was proven true in the past 50 years.
These words are not a question of ideology but of fact. Any serious historical analysis, which is based on facts, will lead in this direction. "Leftists" have it easy in this regard, simply because truth is on our side, and these expressions are the best way we know to reflect that truth. Tone down "socialist rhetoric" (wtf), and you lose the only known grip on truth we have, and the best weapon against capital.
Whether or not a broader appeal has merit will not be determined by the actions within the current members of the movement, but only in the degree of success the movement achieves. Passing declarations makes people feel good, but if it alienates potential allies, it makes achieving objectives more difficult. As Forrest's mama used to say, you can draw more files with honey than with vinegar.
I would also question just how stunning the success of the Tea Party has been. Their favorable vs. unfavorable ratings are weak. The 2010 election was no more of a turn around than the 2006 election. And now, if public opinion polls are to be believed, the nation views the action of the Republicans in Congress with contempt. We have tried Bush, Obama, Democrats, and Republicans pushed to the right by the Tea Party and found them all wanting. The depth and breadth of our discontent is what I find both stunning and welcome. I really do fear that if the forces of the status quo can keep us divided between Tea Party and Occupy Wall St., we lose.
Michael, You are exactly right. Divide and conquer is always a tactc used to weaken the opposition. The name 99% is accurate. It's just that about 30% of the 99% don't even realize that they are serving the interests of the elite. They need to be educated, not excluded.
Hoa binh
The TP is not a popular organisation. It isn't representing people's views. It doesn't offer a "reality based" approach to solving - or even interpreting - issues and problems. It's a manufactured political tool for a political party. Of course individuals can realise this, but as an organisation, OWS can not ally with the Tea Party. May I be wrong though, but I don't see how that could be in this instance. This isn't exclusionism or whatever, it's just about recognising that you can not just wish away real conflicts (of interests, views, knowledge etc.)
Michaelps
You seem to have ignored my points. An uncompromisingly Marxian, class-based stance already has popular appeal. And, as Atomsk, wrote, is the only one that accords with the real theory of how the political-economic world works (and the majority of USAN's viscerally know it). Why appeal to people with falsehoods?
Hasn't your proposed policy of constantly watering down a politcal program out of constantly fear of '"aleanating potential allies" already been tried? It has been the strategy of the Democratic Party since Carter. It has been a utter failure for the 99%! All it has done is either gotten increasingly savage Republicans elected, or utterly compromised, warmongering, imperialist, capitalist boss-ass kissing politicians like the Clintons, Obama, and the majority of the Democrats in the US Congress.
It is so great a failure that it must have been a deliberate strategy to create the fake managed democracy - inverted totalitarianism - we now have. Which makes me wonder what your own political beliefs and agenda are.
pjd412,
You and Atomsk have done a splendid job of crisply articulating the case against "toning it down." I'll tell you what hasn't been tried. We need an amplifier like that one in Spinal Tap with a dial that goes up to eleven. Crank that sucker up ALL the way!
From Rockstroh's magnificent essay:
"Late capitalism has proven to be wholly reliant upon, in fact, addicted to, the creation of bubbles: market and media bubbles, respectively, serving to create inflated wealth and the manufacturing of closed narratives that shield the privileged players within from being held accountable for the consequences of their schemes."
The reason to tone it down is to avoid bursting anyone's bubble.
Interesting take. But since the Teabagger part of the 99% can so easily be coopted by the Kochs, it could mean that once they join the OWS, they can also be convinced of the rest.
'Let the young tears come
Let the calm hand of grief come
It is not as evil as you think.'
Go the whole way
Let the USA go away.
It is a failure.
Make the children learn this by heart,
Refreshing to have an essay with nuggets of literary references and allusions. Happy Stone Crab day on October 15.
from the article:
~ But life itself is too vast, too intricate to be rigged; it is truly too big to fail. Now: To the streets, glistening with renewing rain…to the flaming barricades…its flames caress the future. ~
life is too big to fail? yeah, that Venusian chick working on Mars I dated last week was HOT!
interesting that he combines the images of rain and fire in the same sentence...
here in the NW, we now have regular storms of burning raindrops...
actual rain containing actual hot particles...
raining fire, indeed...
I don't know that I would choose the word caress when connecting this reality with the future, though...
I would choose the word cancerous...they sound similar, but mean very different things...
of course, he didn't mean this sentence to be an analogy to Fukushima...
why would he address Fukushima? why would anyone?
that would just be a drag on the pizza party...
no, I made that connection...
or, rather, Tepco is...right now...still...a triple...meltdown...
tip o' the hat to Blue Oyster Cult:
whoa, no...there goes Tokyo, go, go, Godzilla!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/global/2011/oct/13/fukushima-radiation-tokyo-contamination-reading?newsfeed=true
Thank you, Phil, for another excellent article!
The analysis of the nature and role of addiction (of compulsive and coerced behavior) in the reigning globalized pathology is particularly well taken. Addiction (in the form of substance abuse, junk food, endless snacks, cheap thrills, television watching, celebrity gawking, constant music listening, etc), hype, and late capitalism are intimately tied to each other: they form a feed-back loop.
As you say so well, "[a]ddiction is a pathology of the mechanistic mind; an addict’s disregard for his own body and his exploitative attitude towards the world at large is a microcosmic version of the economic designs of the global economic elite. Apropos, the world is mine to abuse, not to engage...to exploit from within a protective bubble of privilege and entitlement, not to be enjoined with in common communion."
"One must have a mind of winter," indeed.
Time for the "askesis" of the ancients to rise again.
This is moving; this is exquisite. Thank you. I always look forward to reading your pieces, feeling the way you weave the poignancy of our great poets into a very often brutal but truthful narrative. This inspires, offering a kind of hope and faith that we'll find our way together; that we cannot do it alone. A hope corporate media is incapable of delivering.
Where oh where is Madame Defarge when we so desperately need her?
Madame Defarge only recorded the names. First one would need someone to make the heads roll.
Curious how in this "democracy", we can not vote to raise taxes on the 1% who plundered the economy.
Gee, did the 1% buy the government and the media?
Republican pols are a combination of WWF, Mussolini, and Madoff with a strong stench of sociopath.
Democratic pols are bought and paid for.
This is indeed the autumn heading into winter of the USA. It's all about peaked oil. The future will only be about fighting (and dying) for ever-diminishing resources. You grandchildren will need a lot more than good luck. Sorry life is going to suck a whole lot more.
Fine creative insights coupled with an ego driven writing style. Read the last paragraph, it is enough.
All poets are egotists, of course. William Carlos Williams was terribly self-centered:
I have eaten
the plums
that were in
the icebox
and which
you were probably
saving
for breakfast
Forgive me
they were delicious
so sweet
and so cold
It takes a lot of ego to presume that a refrigerator note in three stanzas qualifies as poetry.
Excellent points about capitalism being an addiction. I realized that a few months ago, and now so many things, especially on TV, just have a very different feel to them, almost nauseating. What are 99% of reality shows about? Money. Going to college? Money. Even giving to charities...money (i.e. you can write it off on your taxes). Just sickening.
Just last night, I witnessed that dynamics at work at the local general assembly meeting in my OWS protest. Someone went on a tangent with ideas to raise money with t-shirts, this that and the other thing. One of the young lads in the crowd objected by pointing out the hypocrisy (although he didn't use the word) of protesting against greed and capitalism and, yet, doing the same. Some of us older folk in the crowd had a chuckle. The kid was right! Sadly, without money even the best of intentioned of efforts will fail. What a world we have created for ourselves where pieces of paper rule our lives!
You can say that again.
Just last night, I witnessed that dynamics at work at the local general assembly meeting in my OWS protest. Someone went on a tangent with ideas to raise money with t-shirts, this that and the other thing. One of the young lads in the crowd objected by pointing out the hypocrisy (although he didn't use the word) of protesting against greed and capitalism and, yet, doing the same. Some of us older folk in the crowd had a chuckle. The kid was right! Sadly, without money even the best of intentioned of efforts will fail. What a world we have created for ourselves where pieces of paper rule our lives!
Our father which art on Wall Street,
Honored be thy butt.
Thy kingdom came,
This be thy year,
From sea to shining sea.
Thou givest me false pride,
Funk down by the riverside.
From every head and ass,
May dollars flow.
Give us this day,
Our daily bread.
Forgive us our goofs,
As we war from each other.
Thou makest me to sell dope to small children,
For thou art KING and we adore thee.
Thy destruction and thy power,
They comfort me.
My Cadillac and my Pickway,
They restoreth me in thee.
Yea though I walk through the valley of the shadow of poverty,
I must FEEL their envy.
For I love pie and all those other goodies,
That go along with the Good God,
Big Butt.
- Excerp from "Eulogy and Light" written by Eugene Harris, recorded by Funkadelic, 1970
If you liked Phil Rockstroh's poetic post, you might also like this poetry video:
http://vimeo.com/3303340
Two wonderful extended analogies, with some nicely-selected literary offerings interspersed: the traveling carnival barker imagery, plus the capitalism-as-addiction metaphor, the "dry drunk" aside duly noted.
Very well done, Mr. Rochstroh.
Bill from Saginaw
I would move directly from American Autumn to a revision of the WINTER OF OUR DISCONTENT
Henry III ... By William Shakespeare ... Monologue by Glouster - REVISED:
Now is the winter of our discontent
Made glorious summer by these folk of Newest York;
And all the clouds that lour'd upon our house
In the deep bosom of the ocean buried.
Now are our brows bound with victorious wreaths;
Our bruised arms raised up for monuments;
Our stern alarums changed to solidarity meetings,
Our dreadful marches to delightful measures.
Grim-visaged war hath smooth'd his wrinkled front;
And now, instead of mounting barded steeds
To fright the souls of fearful adversaries,
They caper nimbly in a lady's chamber
To the lascivious pleasing of a lute.
But I, that am not shaped for sportive tricks,
Nor made to court an amorous looking-glass;
I, that am plainly stamp'd, and want love's majesty
To stand before wanton ambling sycophants;
I, that am imbued of this fair proportion,
Cheated of feature by their dissembling nature,
Reformed, unfinish'd, sent at just my time
Into this breathing world, scarce half made up,
And that so firm and unfashionable
That dogs stand by me as I halt by them;
Why, I, in this gathering piping time of peace,
Have no delight to pass away the time,
Unless to spy my shadow in the sun
And descant on mine own worthiness:
And therefore, since I will always prove a lover,
To entertain these fair well-spoken days,
I am determined to prove a voice
And reveal the idle debauchers of these days.
Vision have I laid, inductions indignant…
Dr. Margaret Flowers -- Wall Street Comes to D.C. Healthcare Conference:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sChGo9OP-WA&feature=player_embedded
Dr. Flowers is a fierce warrior -- standing up to the PTB!
Oh, Kay, thank you for bringing this to our attention. Margaret Flowers will join the parade of heroes and heroines who are fighting for all of us. Fucking WOW!!!
Dr. Flowers--Amazing courage... RISE UP!
Thanks for sharing this link, Kay. Dr. Flowers is a real hero, speaking for the 50 million Americans who are without health insurance in this criminal system that rewards corporate greed over human need.
Thanks Phil for your incisive insight. it is food for thought and food for the spirit. you are a brother.
To all those who have a local version of the OWS movement in their backyard, please get out and join them on Sat. the 15th. It will be a big day as worldwide demonstrations will be raging on United for Global Change Day.
http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/october_15_is_the_big_day_20111012/
Atomsk:
The 1% is not a number pulled out of the air. It is the proportion of people who declared an income of greater than $1 million on the last census. For those of you who are opining about who we should and should not reach out to, my counsel is to reach out to everyone. Do not be presumptous that you know what is going on in their brains. Moreover, our conscious brain accounts for only 3% of our total neuronal activity; 97% is subconscious. Also, we are all on a jourrney, and tomorrow we will not be where we are today. The same applies to that cop. In fact, he may be coming toward you!
I have been speaking with some of the young and not so young people standing out there. They are smart enough to know that the system is not working, but not old enough or experienced enough to have an opinion as to what needs to be done. For instance, one was holding a sign saying "take the money out of politics". When I asked him how, he did not have a clue. The only way that I know is to publicly fund elections. That way, our elected officials are accountable to US. "He who pays the piper calls the tune".
Beautiful essay.
"Addiction is a pathology of the mechanistic mind; an addict’s disregard for his own body and his exploitative attitude towards the world at large is a microcosmic version of the economic designs of the global economic elite. Apropos, the world is mine to abuse, not to engage...to exploit from within a protective bubble of privilege and entitlement, not to be enjoined with in common communion."
Indeed, a Buddhist scholar, Roger Corliss, has written [in The Vision of Buddhism] that "addiction" is the best translation for Buddha's term in Pali, "samsara"--which conveys a state of perpetual restlessness and unsatisfactoriness. Indeed, our whole capitalist society is based on samsara/addiction, which is the essence of egocentrism. Rather than see this as inherently tending toward suffering and dis-ease, the machinery of corporate consumerism encourage us to valorize and fetishize one false panacea for what ails us after another.
This is truly a wisdom renouncing society
Many very thoughtful comments. There really is a substantial change in awareness happening. At least on the Internet and it sounds like all over the U$A and beyond. Will it be enough? God of all together now, I certainly hope so. 25,000,000 people sitting down across Amerika will shut it down. 250,000,000 people will be a grand party of Liberation.
It's time to say "No compromise with Satan (today Wall Street, London's financial district, the various war machines of the West, and other assorted gangsters) is possible" as Henry Wallace said in 1942, as well as his "We shall not rest until all the victims of (substitute here these gangster names) yoke are freed." Continuing with "The people's revolution is on the march. . ."
"insist on your portion of fate. . ." is another way of saying we need more "vigilant shariing" so completely pracitced by the IKung in sub Saharan Africa, that birthplace of all humanity and all civilization and with the observation by two north of the border (Scoland) UK evoltionary psychologists, Andrew Whiten and David Erdal, and sometime businessman advocate of all employee owned companies now flourishing in the UK where tried with this kind of vigilant sharing-- showing Europeans can learn from their black African fore fathers and fore mothers of the greatest civlization in all history.
"insist on your portion of fate. . ." is another way of saying we need more "vigilant shariing" so completely pracitced by the IKung in sub Saharan Africa, that birthplace of all humanity and all civilization and with the observation by two north of the border (Scoland) UK evoltionary psychologists, Andrew Whiten and David Erdal, and sometime businessman advocate of all employee owned companies now flourishing in the UK where tried with this kind of vigilant sharing-- showing Europeans can learn from their black African fore fathers and fore mothers of the greatest civlization in all history.
"insist on your portion of fate. . ." is another way of saying we need more "vigilant shariing" so completely pracitced by the IKung in sub Saharan Africa, that birthplace of all humanity and all civilization and with the observation by two north of the border (Scoland) UK evoltionary psychologists, Andrew Whiten and David Erdal, and sometime businessman advocate of all employee owned companies now flourishing in the UK where tried with this kind of vigilant sharing-- showing Europeans can learn from their black African fore fathers and fore mothers of the greatest civlization in all history.