EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Survival of the ... Nicest?
Popular content
Today's Top News
Six Demands to Make of Wall Street
The Occupy Wall Street protests are shining a national spotlight on the most powerful, dangerous, and secretive economic and political force in America.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)
If this country is to break out of the horrendous recession and create the millions of jobs we desperately need, if we are going to create a modicum of financial stability for the future, there is no question but that the American people are going to have to take a very hard look at Wall Street and demand fundamental reforms. I hope these protests are the beginning of that process.
Let us never forget that as a result of the greed, recklessness, and illegal behavior on Wall Street, this country was plunged into the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. Millions of Americans lost their jobs, homes, and life savings as the middle class underwent an unprecedented collapse. Sadly, despite all the suffering caused by Wall Street, there is no reason to believe that the major financial institutions have changed their ways, or that future financial disasters and bailouts will not happen again.
More than three years ago, Congress rewarded Wall Street with the biggest taxpayer bailout in the history of the world. Simultaneously but unknown to the American people at the time, the Federal Reserve provided an even larger bailout. The details of what the Fed did were kept secret until a provision in the Dodd-Frank Act that I sponsored required the Government Accountability Office to audit the Fed’s lending programs during the financial crisis.
As a result of this audit, the American people have learned that the Federal Reserve provided more than $16 trillion in low-interest loans to every major financial institution in this country, huge foreign banks, multi-national corporations, and some of the wealthiest people in the world.
In other words, when Wall Street was on the verge of collapse, the federal government acted boldly, aggressively, and with a fierce sense of urgency to save our financial system from collapse with no strings attached.
Now that the middle class is collapsing and a record-breaking 46 million Americans are living in poverty, the Federal Reserve has failed to act with the same sense of urgency to make sure that small businesses receive the affordable loans needed to put millions of Americans back to work and prevent millions of Americans from losing their homes.
As a result, Wall Street is back to making record-breaking profits, handing out record-breaking compensation packages, and taking the same risks that caused the financial crisis in the first place. Meanwhile, 25 million Americans are unemployed or under-employed; middle class families are making $3,600 less than they did ten years ago; the foreclosure rate is still breaking new records; and the American people are still paying over $3.40 for a gallon of gas.
The financial crisis and the jobs crisis have demonstrated to the American people that we now have a government that is of the 1 percent, by the 1 percent and for the 1 percent, as Nobel Prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz eloquently articulated. The rest of the 99 percent are, more or less, on their own. We now have the most unequal distribution of wealth and income of any major, advanced country on earth. The top one percent earn more income than the bottom 50 percent and the richest 400 Americans own more wealth than the bottom 150 million Americans.
Now that Occupy Wall Street is shining a spot light against Wall Street greed and the enormous inequalities that exist in America, the question then becomes, how do we change the political, economic and financial system to work for all Americans, not just the top 1 percent?
Here are several proposals that I am working on:
1) If a financial institution is too big to fail, it is too big to exist. Today, the six largest financial institutions have assets equal to more than 60 percent of GDP. The four largest banks in this country issue two-thirds of all credit cards, half of all mortgages, and hold nearly 40 percent of all bank deposits. Incredibly, after we bailed out these big banks because they were "too big to fail," three out of the four largest are now even bigger than they were before the financial crisis began. It is time to take a page from Teddy Roosevelt and break up these behemoths so that their failure will no longer lead to economic catastrophe and to create competition in our financial system.
2) Put a cap on credit card interest rates to end usury. Today, more than a quarter of all credit card holders in this country are paying interest rates above 20 percent and as high as 59 percent. When credit card companies charge 25 or 30 percent interest rates they are not engaged in the business of “making credit available” to their customers. They are involved in extortion and loan-sharking. Citigroup, Bank of America, and JP Morgan Chase should not be permitted to charge consumers 25-30 percent interest on their credit cards, especially while these banks received over $4 trillion in loans from the Federal Reserve.
3) The Federal Reserve needs to provide small businesses in America with the same low-interest loans it gave to foreign banks. During the financial crisis, the Federal Reserve provided hundreds of billions of dollars to foreign banks and corporations including the Arab Banking Corporation, Toyota, Mitsubishi, the Korea Development Bank, and the state-owned Bank of Bavaria. At a time when small businesses can't get the lending they need, it is time for the Fed to create millions of American jobs by providing low-interest loans directly to small businesses.
4) Stop Wall Street oil speculators from artificially increasing gasoline and heating oil prices. Right now, the American people are being gouged at the gas pump by speculators on Wall Street who are buying and selling billions of barrels of oil in the energy futures market with no intention of using a drop for any purpose other than to make a quick buck. Delta Airlines, Exxon Mobil, the American Trucking Association, and other energy experts have estimated that excessive oil speculation is driving up oil prices by as much as 40 percent. We have got to end excessive oil speculation and bring needed relief to American consumers.
5) Demand that Wall Street invest in the job-creating productive economy, instead of gambling on worthless derivatives. The American people have got to make it crystal clear to Wall Street that the era of excessive speculation is over. The “heads, bankers win; tails, everyone else loses” financial system must end. Most important, we need to create a new Wall Street that exists not to reward CEOs and investors for the bets they make on exotic financial instruments nobody understands. Rather, we need a Wall Street that provides financial services to small businesses and manufacturers to create decent-paying jobs and grow the economy by productive means. Think of all of the productive short- and long-term investments that could be made in our country right now if Wall Street used the money it has received from the federal government wisely. Instead of casino-style speculation, Wall Street could invest in high-speed trains; fuel-efficient cars; wind turbines and other alternative energy sources; affordable housing; affordable prescription drugs that save people’s lives; and other things that America desperately needs. That is what we have got to demand from Wall Street.
6) Establish a Wall Street speculation fee on credit default swaps, derivatives, stock options and futures. Both the economic crisis and the deficit crisis are a direct result of the greed and recklessness on Wall Street. Establishing a speculation fee would reduce gambling on Wall Street, encourage the financial sector to invest in the productive economy, and significantly reduce the deficit without harming average Americans. There are a number of precedents for this. The U.S had a similar Wall Street speculation fee from 1914 to 1966. The Revenue Act of 1914 levied a 0.2 percent tax on all sales or transfers of stock. In 1932, Congress more than doubled that tax to help finance the government during the Great Depression. And today, England has a financial transaction tax of 0.25 percent, a penny on every $4 invested.
Making these reforms will not be easy. After all, Wall Street is clearly the most powerful lobbying force on Capitol Hill. From 1998 through 2008, the financial sector spent over $5 billion in lobbying and campaign contributions to deregulate Wall Street. More recently, they spent hundreds of millions more to make the Dodd-Frank bill as weak as possible, and after its passage, hundreds of millions more to roll back or diluter the stronger provisions in that legislation.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



158 Comments so far
Show AllFirst things first:
0.1) End Campaign Bribery
0.2) End Corporate Personhood
0.3) End Wars and Militarism
Okay, continue on arranging the deck chairs.
Although I applaud Bernie's efforts, it is apparent that anybody who has been in DC more than 6 months has lost the ability to make structural repairs.
Other than breaking up the too-big-to-fail banks, none of Bernie's recommendations are structural changes. Taking all private money out of political campaigns and making structural changes to the financial industry are essential to solving the problem.
The first step is to go to public financing of campaigns and restructuring the financial industry by restoring all of FDR's New Deal financial industry regulations that were overturned during the past 33 years.
After those structural reforms are complete, it will be beneficial to implement Bernie's recommendations.
As many in the monetary reform movement suggest, nationalize the Federal Reserve so that the government can create debt free money, instead of having the government borrow money at interest, and then letting the private banks create the bulk of the money via the pyramid scheme of fractional reserve lending at interest, which is the real Ponzi scheme because it continues to create debt to infinity.
_________________________________________________
In other words, money is created out of thin air by the banks; the government could do the same thing and cut out the middle-man - the banks - who siphons off wealth in the form of interest on money that they created out of thin air!
_________________________________________________
On a state level, a state bank could issue low interest loans to businesses and use the interest to run the state, eliminating taxes. Yes, you are right, much of "Wall Street" is nothing but a parasite sucking the life out of our democracy. And yet these global bankers are freakin demanding - demanding! - the continuation of the fraudulent little game that makes them super-rich.
____________________________________________
We, the people need to create our own money. Debt-based money is slavery. The whole thing is morally indefensible. Hell, maybe we should just nationalize the entire banking system. Some might say that is outrageous. I say, it's time to be outrageous
With regards to "fractional reserve lending at interest," this is an important practice because savers want the ability to withdraw their money on demand, and borrowers need the assurance that their loans will not be called simply because the savers want their money immediately. Of course if no interest were charged, then everyone would want a large loan. The main problem with the state taking over the issuance of loans is that it would open the door for a greater amount of pay-offs and graft. "Loan officers" would likely have less oversight than in a traditional private bank where the bank owner would want to see his business thrive rather than go under.
There could be two kinds of deposits: one always available for withdrawal, but without interest received (the interest on checking accounts is miniscule, anyway...) -- mere storage, although digitally storing an integer isn't something that would require a banking institution nowadays; the other not withdrawable for a preset duration, but with interest received -- essentially a loan, but one based on existing money, and merely managed by the banking institution. In this scenario, interest would become morally defensible, as it would be a service charge on real instead of thin-air credit.
This model would allow for a full-reserve system, with no inherent inflation (as long as economic performance remains constant) and no inherent drive for exponential growth.
If no interest is received, most money would likely move elsewhere except for abnormal times such as we currently have. Thus, in most cases, liquidity would be hindered. If one had sudden need for a large sum of money, he would be at the mercy of a money lender. That would be far less than ideal. There are trade-offs to every imaginable banking system. Personally, I think the present system is reasonable except that we have allowed the creation of too-big-to-fail institutions. If the Occupy movement could put an end to these behemoths, then this alone would make this effort massively worthwhile.
I, for one, feel no urge to have my money multiply on its own, well knowing that it CAN'T. Some unfortunate soul would have to pick up the tab instead, as is happening the world over, and sparking huge protests at that. Thanks, but no thanks.
To me, money is an instrument to facilitate trade, as barter is simply too inconvenient in this era of specialization. And I do not think its current incarnation is reasonable. So I guess we will have to agree to disagree.
.
bruce1337 in part wrote:
There could be two kinds of deposits: one always available for withdrawal, but without interest received (the interest on checking accounts is miniscule, anyway...) -- mere storage, although digitally storing an integer isn't something that would require a banking institution nowadays; . . .
* * * * *
My Reply:
bruce1337,
Mere storage does require a banking system, including a least one banking institution, at least indirectly. This is true of alternative money systems, such as LetSystems and Ithaca Hours, as well.
There must be some "institution" with the authority to verify that stored information, whether in the form of binary 1s and 0s or currency script, actually represents money of some particular type; and who "owns" that money, an account holder or the bearer respectively, for instance. That way even if some other kind of organization gives a person some kind of POS (Point of Sale) debit card with "money" stored on the card just like a gift card, when the card is debited a corresponding debit is made to the debit card issuing organization's money account and a credit to the retailer's money account.
Otherwise, you are back to creating money out of thin air, except without any limiting controls whatsoever on the creation of that money.
- -
LetSystems:
Wikipedia URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_Exchange_Trading_Systems
Ithaca Hours:
Wikipedia URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ithaca_Hours
.
"Of course if no interest were charged, then everyone would want a large loan."
Borrowers would still have to pay the loan off on terms they can afford. And right now, no interest is charged... TO THE BANKSTERS ONLY. So why not everyone else? And if no interest works for the Banksters, isn't it fair it works for everyone? And that it actually would work, as it currently is working... as it is for the Banksters?
"The main problem with the state taking over the issuance of loans is that it would open the door for A Greater Amount of Pay-offs and Graft (!?!). Loan officers would likely have less oversight than in a traditional private bank where the bank owner would want to see his business thrive rather than go under." HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Surely you jest... "a greater amount of payoffs and graft" THAN WALL STREET, BERNIE MADOFF, ANGELO MOZILO, and on and on and on? And you say less graft and corruption in the current bankster system, than in, say, a Park Ranger-style system? Ah, but of course, those Park Rangers are notorious for ther payoffs and graft; certainly nothing like those stirling-ethical-standard banksters employing those high-pressure, sell-or-die, commission-only saleswiseguys. Right?
"we should just nationalize the entire banking system."
I think that is the best idea.
I concur, as long as it's governed by reason -- more likely those running it are accountable to We the people instead of being private business -- but make no mistake: These are the crown jewels of the empire, they will not be ceded without a fight. Then again, the time for this fight seems to be just about now.
The reason there is no regulation (thanks Nixon), is because all finacial institutions and government agencies are fraud filled. (I saw this first hand and was threatened with prison because I must have been part of the problem to know so much). Sure, I was paid well by the people making the big $. Put all those government lawyers to work and actually have some accountability.
well seen and expressed, BB.
It is imperative that public financing of campaigns is #1.
Corporate personhood must go.
Everything else will then fall in line.
raydelcamino in part wrote:
Other than breaking up the too-big-to-fail banks, none of Bernie's recommendations are structural changes. Taking all private money out of political campaigns and making structural changes to the financial industry are essential to solving the problem.
The first step is to go to public financing of campaigns and restructuring the financial industry by restoring all of FDR's New Deal financial industry regulations that were overturned during the past 33 years.
* * * *
My Reply:
raydelcamino,
Public financing of campaigns by itself will not even bring about substantial regulation of the expenditure of private money in political campaigns. Two U.S. Supreme Court decisions must also be overturned, Buckley v. Valeo and Citizens United v. FEC.
Breaking up the big financial institutions and restoring and updating all of FDR's New Deal financial industry regulations are the least that should be done to stop the ongoing looting of the economy and "they win, we lose" risky speculation by the financial industry.
Your #2 must be enacted before any other changes have a chance of being passed. As long as corporations have the rights of an individual human being, our elections will be manipulated and we haven't a ghost of a chance of making any other changes.
Great suggestions, DT.
Cut the roots first.
Yes to all of the above AND...Stop the Debt Based Monetary System and exterminate it's Evil Overlord...the Federal Reserve.
Ha!
Yes, yes, and yes. I would add: single-payer, nonprofit, universal health care; a minimum wage high enough to actually LIVE on (something like $20/hour!); the end of computerized voting machines (& their hackability!); how about NATIONIALIZING the oil & gas industries, and getting rid of, or nationalizing, the FED as well. Heading off future looting is fine, but does nothing for those who have ALREADY BEEN LOOTED. The Senator probably means well, but he sounds really, really out-of-touch.
"Both the economic crisis and the deficit crisis are a direct result of the greed and recklessness on Wall Street. "
w/ tacit approval from politicians elected w/ wall street's money. marionettes on strings.
..............................
i don't know about "demands", but 6 good ideas that should be implemented. personally, i believe 16 trillion dollars could have been magically transformed into health care for all - single payer US govt health care.
.............................
thanks CD for posting bernie's message. bernie - have you ever considered running for president as an independent ?
...peace...
Um...the wars Bernie, the wars. Stop taking your eye off the g-ddamned ball Bernie. Jesus wept...talk about carts before horses. It's all connected for Christ's sake...
I refuse to put up with another four godd-mned years of all politicians acting like there is NO connection between wasting money on wars and our suffering back home. Of promising us jobs, while they kill, kill, kill. Of throwing us 100 dollar "rebate" checks while Killing and killing and killing...this is INSANE. What are you doing about the wars Bernie?! The wars! THE WARS, BERNIE!
Imagine Bernie doing the six and the populous stepping beyond and the 99% demanding the legislated elimination of the Fed
I agree. End the wars and the imperial overstretch and use the money saved for jobs refurbishing infrastructure here. Hey, and how about "the greatest country in the world" quote unquote finally having a decent national rail system. The US government could expand and improve Amtrak - creating jobs - and then sell it, returning the money to the taxpayers. With Peak Oil here, transporting people and cargo around the country by rail is a hell of a lot more fuel efficient than cars, trucks and planes.
I disagree on item 4. We need to focus on using less oil, not on making it cheaper.
Oh we will - just as soon as it's gone/unaffordable. And that day is coming soon. Real soon. Sorry to all of you that don't have a bicycle (and the legs to use it (if you're not too fat to stay upright)). Oh! And the lack of public transportation for the longer trips.
Sucks being american. But I'm ahead of the curve.
Dude - there is no "WAR". Darwin said it, "survival of the fittest".
Tell me you've never seen in a grocery store someone that was [enter your preferred term for large] rolling up-and-down the aisles on a motorized cart instead of, what's it called, walking? And I'm not talking about disabled persons; which is who those motorized carts are meant for.
Ignorance - No. Prejudice - No. Just an observation.
I weigh myself each and every morning - so I know if I need to exercise a bit more or eat a bit less.
And, I was also talking about fitness (which you chose to ignore). I've gone without riding for a few months before and then my legs BURN after a few blocks. So I make a short ride to the store every day to keep in shape.
So, in the lyrics of Queen - "get on your bike and ride"!
I didn't mean to offend f@t people - but you have to be ready for the inevitable. Peak oil.
So what are the elderly and the truly disabled supposed to do for transportation? Do you begrudge them access to affordable transportation thru funding public transport or providing an affordable way for them to drive themselves? Not everyone is or will remain young and healthy their whole lives no matter how they care for their bodies. Plus, in my area the winters are way too cold to ride bikes and what are folks in rural areas to do when all the services, businesses and grocery stores may be fifty miles away? Do you propose we go back to the horse and buggy days out in rural America?
Yes. Oh, and most everywhere else to. Survival of the fittest is not about the strongest or most powerful but all about adaptation to change. Basically what evolution is, is a particular species ability to adapt to change. It may mean changing shape, color, going into or out of the water, growing a longer neck or teeth, developing keener senses or any one of thousands of ways a species changes to their environment.
If we are so closed as to not use our intelligence to realize we are destroying ourselves and our precious environment then we will go the way of all the behemoths that came to their end because they couldn't adjust to the most obvious dangers.
We have used our intelligence to manipulate externals in our environment (earth) and in so doing have become plague onto ourselves and all creatures great and small. What is so shocking as there has been no parallel growth in our internal development. That of compassion, empathy, oneness, love and spiritual unfoldment.
You must realize that over 90% of the sick people in the world would achieve suitable health if they just ate pure (organic) whole foods (mostly vegetarian) in their natural state, exercised and lived a simpler less stressful competitive life.
I myself would have died by the time I was thirty if I had not changed my lifestyle radically when I was a hippy in the late 60's. 90% of food in supermarkets is pure crap which shouldn't even be eat by a dog.
"The Times They Are A Chang'n" are we????
No. Your are not ahead of any curve. You may think you are something special. And you are, but not all that special.
3) The Federal Reserve needs to provide small businesses in America with the same low-interest loans it gave to foreign banks.
No!!!!! Bernie Sanders knows very well that the Fed is a private centralized criminal cartel. End the Fed! http://www.dailygrail.com/blogs/fahim-knight/2010/1/Federal-Reserve-Criminal-Cartel-Which-World-Silent-About
The article you link to features videos of Ron Paul. As I have said many times on CD, Paul is to be congratulated for pointing out the problem, but his solution - the gold standard - is, to me, wrong and is derived from a misreading of history.
Agreed. As far as I've been able to figure out there is only three real uses for gold. 1) teeth fillings, 2) electrical connections and 3) jewelry. And none of those tells me that it should be a 'monetary' standard. I've tried to find out, but I just don't get it. Sure, it's 'rare', but it actually has very limited usage.
I just don't get it.
It's not really that complicated. There are thousands of years of human history, and political regimes have always wanted to spend more money than they can collect in taxes without causing rebellion. Solution: degrade the currency. In earlier times they just used cheap metal to mix with the precious metals used for coinage. Now they just print, or even beter, create money electronically. How does an old retired person protect the money he or she earned with years of backbreaking work? Gold or silver. Can't make it out of thin air or debase it if monitored properly.
BTW, Ron Paul understands this, even if he doesn't understand Wall Street.
Seconded.
Who knows how much gold the 'elite' have hoarded by now...
So true........the price is manipulated (much like housing and gas) and as we all know, the rich become richer.
Fiat Currency (worthless, faith based) as a basis of a monetary system will always fail in the end.
Couple that with a Debt Based monetary system as we've had with the Fed since 1913, which is inherently designed to produce the results that we're experiencing now. We're not here because of incompetence or miscalculation, we're here because this is where this plane is supposed to land.
"... this is where this plane is supposed to land."
_______________
Not to quibble, but "land" = "crash & burn". ;)
Kitaj: You are correct. Ron Paul should examine the gold standard thing again. If it is merely to have gold as the basis of currency, it will be just a fractional reserve system with the fraction, fixed or variable, and the banks creating the money as they do now.
Somebody should pass out pamphlets to the street protesters with all the good quotes from B. Franklin and T. Jefferson and A. Lincoln on monetary reform. The problem is getting past the 'censorship by silence' that keeps the people from supporting reform.
This is all well and fine...but first and foremost...end the wars.
Then stop the bleed to Wall Strret/lobbyists/campaign bought politicians...
And did anyone mention closing off NAFTA and bringing back jobs from overseas? helloooo All this crap started gangbusters when companies could ship jobs and money overseas and then NOT pay taxes on their excess profits. They are getting away with the crime of the century. Now they also are offering up more major war machine jobs as if it's ok...NOT Have you seen what GE is doing? OMG and Boeing OMG
And what about prosecutions?
What? Hold people accountable?
How is that going to induce them not to do the same things in the future?
Besides, that's so "looking backward".
We're supposed to "look forward".
Didn't you get the Obama message?
Bernie obviously did.
As you noted, he did not even mention prosecutions - as if no one broke a single law.
S&L investigator William Black begs to differ, of course. But why would anyone care what he thinks? He's just an expert on bank fraud.
Shouldn't the reimplementation of Glass Steagall be on the list? Did I miss it?
And, I agree with the writers who list "END THE WARS!" That price tag is 50% of the U.S. deficit and the death and destruction wielded against a growing number of countries around the world -- more than 700 military bases in about 130 countries -- does NOT win hearts and minds. We need to dismantle the empire!
For the most part, I like Bernie Sanders. However, from what I have noticed, he votes to increase military spending whenever those bills come before the senate.
All of these issues are connected to Wall Street (M$M; environmental, agribusiness and dirty energy; offense contractors and wars; health insurance rather than health care; trade deals and loss of jobs in U.S., etc.) are at the heart of OCCUPY WALL STREET -- and, of course, many more issues are being discussed every day. Is Bernie's list meant as suggestions for OCCUPY WALL STREET, or is he attempting to speak for OCCUPY WALL STREET?
Reforms don't go far enough -- the systems, themselves, need to be challenged. It's too late to just tinker around on the edges. That's what OCCUPY WALL STREET is about, IMO.
Kay: "For the most part, I like Bernie Sanders. However, from what I have noticed, he votes to increase military spending whenever those bills come before the senate."
For the most part, I like your post. However, please tell me what's to like about Bernie Sanders if he votes to increase military spending? Other than the fact that he is just another war monger, what's to like?
Like Kucinich (and former Sen. Feingold) Sanders is trotted out periodically to make progressive yapping noises in an attempt to mollify the hoi polloi. Then, when the heat abates, they dutifully return to their gilded cage of PAC money, excellent healthcare, pensions and perks.
"Shouldn't the reimplementation of Glass Steagall be on the list?
I don't get it. He's hammered on about this on Thom Hartmann's program a number of times that I recall.
Well stated overall, KJ
Thanks, Kay.
I, too, looked fruitlessly for the two simple words "Glass Steagall" in this piece.
C'mon, Bernie ... say it out loud.
"C'mon, Bernie ... say it out loud." -- Goebbels sez
EXACTLY!!
Great comment Kay. Reinstating Glass-Steagall and ending all the wars bring the list up to 8. My nomination for number 9 is "Jump, you bastards, jump".