EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Pregnant Anti-War Soldier Sent to Prison
- The Sick Madness of Tom Friedman's Culture
Popular content
Today's Top News
A Labor Breakthrough: Occupy Wall Street’s Union Connections and the Role of Solidarity in Staying Power
“Labor is up against the wall, and they are looking for means of fighting back,” says Jackie DiSalvo, a 68-year-old union member and activist in Occupy Wall Street’s labor outreach working group, which organized Wednesday’s march of 20,000 people including members from at least a dozen unions in New York.
According to DiSalvo, “[The march] was a big breakthrough in that the unions were working together and they were supporting a very militant action—an occupation—and they were supporting an action which targeted the top one percent as the enemy, not just their own particular employers.”
Solidifying widespread union support (the AFL-CIO announced its support Wednesday) marks a significant step forward for Occupy Wall Street, not just in the large numbers of people that unions mobilize but also the diversity of people identifying with their struggle.
“Involving labor changes the racial composition of the group, because the workers in New York City tend to be black and Latino,” says DiSalvo, “And there’s also outreach being done by blacks and Latinos inOccupy Wall Street to communities of color, so we expect that as well as the labor alliance—and they overlap—to greatly strengthen the actions.”
Occupy Wall Street’s alliance with unions and other community organizations is not spontaneous. The labor support/outreach working group formed early in the occupation and has grown to more than 60 people. They have garnered support from unions by directly supporting labor struggles throughout the city. The effort began with Occupy Wall Street participants infiltrating and disrupting a Sotheby’s auction to point out that the company is making huge profits and increasing the CEO’s salary while expecting art handlers—Teamsters Local 814 members—to reduce work hours and drop their 401K plans.
Occupy Wall Street demonstrators next showed support for labor at a postal workers’ rally on September 27. Ari Cohen, a 21-year-old violin player who’s been camping out in Zuccotti Park since day one, described his participation:“The police actively tried to stop us—tried to kettle us, did block streets—but we still managed to outmaneuver them, to make turns around them to get to the postal workers’ rally, and when we got there, there was an outpouring of support, and it was such a powerful feeling.”
It was then, according to DiSalvo, that other unions saw how Occupy Wall Street could support them and the connections between struggles really started rolling. “ [The youth participants are] working class or they’re downwardly mobile from the middle class, so they have a natural alliance with the working class that are in unions,” she says. “I don’t think there’s been a youth movement that has so solidly taken up the agenda of labor and identified the enemy as the bosses that employ them.”
The positive energy emerging from such acts of solidarity offers the chance to answer a question most news outlets haven’t been asking about Occupy Wall Street participants—why do they stay? We know who they are—the 99 percent of Americans who don’t control most the country’s wealth—and we know that they’ve surged to Wall Street in the days since September 17 because they are fed up with the economic system we live under. But what makes hundreds of people remain in Liberty Plaza, facing mass arrests and sleeping outside even as the cold sets in and rain falls at night?
Some analysts point out that the participants’—especially youth—have nothing left to lose. While anger and frustration may be enough to bring people to the streets, it’s not the force that keeps them there. Put simply, these economic discontents are occupying Wall Street in order to build. What they’re constructing doesn’t come with blue prints, though. It’s a process that continues to unfold even as their energy sparks other occupations throughout the country.
“This space to me is almost like a brainstorming space,” says Sandra Nurse, a 27-year-old graduate student who has worked for the United Nations. “It’s a space where we can come together and have continuity in our ideas and in our conversations and think about how we can build a better world.”
Ari Cohen considers the participatory democracy happening in the space an active part of the building process. He says,“By attending these General Assemblies, places where everyone has a voice, where everyone is equal, there are no leaders, we are all horizontally organized, we are actually able to hear from people from different backgrounds, learn from each other, and through that process, not just in physical actions, but in intellectual and spiritual ways, learn how to create a new world, because we have so much to unlearn and this process itself, provides a way to begin to re-learn how we can interact with each other and how we can live with each other.”
Malcolm, a self-described cynic from Brooklyn who appreciates the social relationships at Occupy Wall Street, says, “I’m a big fan of example. If things are visibly existing outside of—as opposed to within—current systems of economy or politics, then people can see that and learn about it.”
The learning taking place in Liberty Plaza distinguishes the occupation from other forms of political action. By being there day and night, participants open themselves to questions and involvement from people who might not come out to an individual protest or march. “We’re right on Broadway. People are holding up signs and we have a welcome desk there, and passersby are coming and checking us out,” DiSalvo explains. “They’ll stay and listen to a speaker or come to a General Assembly. We’ll feed anybody who comes into the park.”
Besides being accessible, the taking of the park as a continuous public forum also signifies the resolve to make the education and discussions productive. Nurse says, “It is not a one-off event. This is a very serious effort to stay, and to say that we need to come up with something that’s going to be sustainable.”
Nurse knows there’s no easy solution. “As it stands I don’t see this as a model for necessarily a better world,” she says, “but it is a springboard for ideas, and I think that pushing, working through the pains of growing and expanding and incorporating the entire spectrum of voices and grievances is definitely something that is worthwhile.”
By securing solidarity from union workers, the spectrum of voices supporting Occupy Wall Street expanded tremendously this week. What’s next is for the participants to find new ways to draw out the rest of the 99 percent.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



20 Comments so far
Show AllOccupy accepts support and aims to coopt all unions, security forces etc. but refuses to support any Democrat or predatory capitalist agenda or operation.
i object to your lumping "unions" in with "security forces." It shows an ignorance of, and disrespect for the unionists who have fought and still fight against security, cops and sometimes military.
Don't be a punk. You should know better. Support from the unions has been essential to OWS survival and growth, and of course it has gone both ways with OWS showing solidarity in action at local union pickets.
If any company unions show up trying to pass themselves off as activists, it will be apparent, I think, and OWS will reject them.
The unions can join the OWS but they will not be held favored except as one person,one vote, one ideal...stop the bleeding of the country by the pigs who think they are in power. There is no room whatsoever for giving anyone organization a leadership role. That's how we got in this mess in the first place.
uh-huh, one union representing oil field workers showed up in d.c. (damned corrupt) to show support for the keystone pipedream.
drilling for dollars--even if we destroy the land, the air, the mountains and the oceans--and our children's furture.
shame on you!
This would be an opportunity to distinguish the genuinely representative unions from those which have been in bed with business for too long. AFL-CIO treachery should be exposed for starters.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=27012
OCCUPY should avoid unions. Occupy is growing just fine without the Union's or their affiliated pac's and political parties. Unions will poison the movement.
Zeofredo zeros in on the right track.......push corrupt unions out into the sunlight!
Very disturbing piece.
There will be a series of "delicate" moments here and, IMO, the success of the movement will depend, not on whether OWS "joins" Labor, or Peace, or Environment, but on whether these "groups" join OWS ...
To the extent that they do, that, e.g.. to the extent Labor stays even when the actions are not "just" about traditional labor concerns, but about the others as well - then and only then will the movement have a chance of effecting real change .....
NO, NO, NO ! The OCCUPY movement is about individual participation not organizational endorsement or participation. If the individuals who belong to an organization want to independently participate fine, but not as organizations or organization goons. The OCCUPY movement must REJECT any organizational endorsement. OCCUPY is a PEOPLE'S movement.
I don't think any one of us has the right to say what the movement is or should be "about." The tactic being used against it is that the demands aren't specific and no one is in charge. To me that is what's good about it.
Some of the goals could be 1) to see that someone at a high enough level to matter is prosecuted for the crimes of the financial institutions. 2) To use some of the money that the financial institutions are holding onto to help people who are unemployed and in a mortgage crisis. 3) Overturn the corporate personhood doctrine and rewrite the laws so that senior management and large stockholders have some liability for the actions of their institution. There are a lot more and if even one of them could be brought into being, the OWS demonstrations will be considered -- by me -- a successful first step.
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
You exhibit a very anti-union POV.
Who are the goons you speak of? Tht's a typical right wing anti-union slur.
Do you think that their are no organizations or unoins that are PEOPLE'S organizations?
I am not against the unions participating. I just don't think the whole thing is about them or should be. A lot of organizations are people's, although my personal experience with SEIU during an early precursor of what later happened in Wisconsin was not a positive one for me. The union leaders hogged the media and never let us the employees affected speak for ourselves, and local media cooperated with the information blockade completely.
As a union organizer, my priority has always been to democratize the union!
I have found that the unions I worked for welcomed democratization, but they were expanding unions, not decaying "multi-tiered" old boys networks.
One of the great weakneses of the 60's protest movement was its alienation from the unions and the working masses. I think that OWS and the new generation of activists, including young unionists, are finishing healing that wound and more power to them.
I agree. If the oligarchs get the 99% fighting and putting up divisions amongst ourselves about who is worthy and who is not - they will win and we will lose. We must not become divided. As long as this movement stays about exposing and removing the oligarchic grip on our govt institutions, our economy, and our democracy, this movement will not be coopted by the enemy, which is the very govt. of the U.S., and the capitalists that own this govt.
You should really put that on a business card and hand it out at Occupy events or post it, twitter it...
But replace "the Oligarchs" with "the 1%" for more mass distribution.
What will be interesting to see is if the initial Occupy Wall Streeter's and the union crowd will work together despite cultural differences. Hopefully, both are mindful that is was cultural differences that right wing media used as a wedge to help alienate two constituencies who have a lot more in common with each other than those who would divide them. Divide and conquer is a time-tested tactic that works.
Nice observation, Nate.
Any exclusion of any organization of the people by the OWS movement is participation in the duopoly's attempt to divide and conquer.
You are clearly not paying attention. Trumka is leading a drive to reduce union support for the Dems and instead focus funds on union building.
If we should beware of anything it's the blanket anti-unionism that you spout. are you a liartarian?