Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Warning Occupy Wall Street Has for President Obama
On Wednesday afternoon, we marched out of Zuccotti Park, where the Occupy Wall Street demonstrators have bedded down for the duration. Drums were pounding and shouts of “Whose streets? Our streets!” “All day, all week, occupy Wall Street,” and “This is what democracy looks like, that is what hypocrisy looks like!” rang out as we headed directly into New York City’s version of a police state. The helicopters with the high-tech sensors and high-resolution cameras hovered in the distant sky, the security cams peered down from walls, the barriers the police had set up hemmed us in -- no street, just sidewalk for these demonstrators -- and the cops, scores of flexi-cuffs looped at their belts, were lined up all along the way, while empty buses wheeled past ready for future arrestees.
(photo: Ianqui Doodle)
This was not exactly a shining Big Apple example of the “freedom” to demonstrate. It was demonstration as imprisonment and at certain moments, at least for this 67-year-old, it was claustrophobic. This is the way the state treats 15,000 terrorist suspects, not its own citizens.
Still, the energy and high spirits were staggering. The unions were out -- nurses, teachers, construction workers -- the bands were lively (“… down by the riverside, ain’t gonna study war no more…”), and hand-made signs were everywhere and about everything under the sun: “Crime does pay in the USA -- on Wall Street,” “When did the common good become a bad idea,” “4 years in college, $100,000 in debt, for a hostess job,” “Eat the rich,” “Arab Spring to Wall Street Fall” (with the final “L” in “Fall” slipping off the sign), “We are the 99%,” “Legalize online poker, occupy Wall St.”
Amid the kaleidoscopic range of topics on those signs and in those chants and cries, one thing, one name, was largely missing: the president's. In those hours marching and at Foley Square amid the din of so many thousands of massed people, I saw one sign that said “Obama = Bush” and another that went something like “The Barack Obama we elected would be out here with us.” That was it. Sayonara.
It’s as if the spreading movement, made up of kids who might once have turned out for presidential candidate Obama, had left him and his administration in the dust. Like big labor, the left, and the media, the administration that loved its bankers to death (and got little enough in return for that embrace) is now playing catch-up with a ragtag bunch of protesters it wouldn’t have thought twice about if they hadn't somehow caught the zeitgeist of this moment. (Don’t forget that the Obama administration was similarly left scrambling and desperately behind events when it came to the demonstrators in Tahrir Square in Cairo last January.)
The best Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner could say a few days ago, when asked about his sympathies for the Occupy Wall Street movement, was: "I feel a lot of sympathy for what you might describe as a general sense among Americans that we've lost a sense of possibility." Really? White House Chief of Staff Bill Daley didn’t know if the movement was exactly “helpful” for the White House agenda. Truly? And White House press spokesman Jay Carney commented blandly, “I would simply say that, to the extent that people are frustrated with the economic situation, we understand.” Do you?
Suddenly, last Thursday, with news about the anti-Wall Street movement whipping up a storm, the Obama administration found itself out of breath and running hard to reposition itself. Vice President Joe Biden said, “The core is the bargain has been breached with the American people,” while at his news conference addressing questions about the movement the president added, “I think it expresses the frustrations that the American people feel... [T]he protesters are giving voice to a more broad-based frustration about how our financial system works.”
Still, those signs with everything but Barack Obama on them should be considered a warning. Recently, Ariel Dorfman, the Chilean writer and activist, penned a message from a man who died in the attacks of September 11th. His name was Salvador Allende, he was the elected president of Chile, and the “terrorists” on that day in 1973 were the Chilean military backed by the CIA. (Strangely enough, afterwards no one declared a global war on anyone.)
Dorfman, author most recently of Feeding on Dreams: Confessions of an Unrepentant Exile, channels warning words from “the dead” to Barack Obama. But mark my words, Allende’s isn’t the only warning to the president at this moment. Those kids in downtown Manhattan (and increasingly across the country and the world) are offering their own warning, and theirs, after a fashion, comes from the future, one in which Obama’s presidency could someday be seen as little but an irrelevancy.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



70 Comments so far
Show AllYes ! Yes ! Yes ! We, the Occupy Wallstreeters are fighting for a "CLIMATIC" change to our economic, political and social environments We need an entirely new philosopical underpinning to our nation and the world. We do not ask Obama or anyone from the power elite to send a plane up into the clouds (congress? government?) to seed it so as to bring us a few inches of rainfall. We want to STOP the "climatic change" and "desertification" that has already been wrought by the capitalist system before it worsen further. Before it destroys all life on Earth.
"the future, one in which Obama’s presidency could someday be seen as little but an irrelevancy".
We should be so lucky - I fear it will be far from "an irrelevancy", but rather one of the essential moments leading to full realization of totalitarianism (No -- I don't mean that Obama is a Kenyan anti-coloniaIist socialist -- I say this "from the left", from the haunted horror I felt as I walked by the slanted granite slabs outside the Bundestag in Berlin, memorializing all those in the Bundestag who had opposed Hitler and been executed in the streets or elsewhere as a result).
I am a Jewess. I am a Liberal. I am a Feminist.
I may soon leave this coming REICH behind.
Where are YOU, Barack???
If you were standing WITH OW, I would not consider jumping ship.
But my ancestors and members of my family died during a very similar period in human history, when leaders became more interested in pleasing the elite than in protecting their people from tyranny.
Where in the hell ARE you, Mr Barack Obama???
SAME OLD...SAME OLD !!!
Has anyone realized (if only for a second, or less than that) how similar the
Ocuppy Wall Street is to the Obama organization's organization of "youth" in
2008?
The occupiers and their liberal/progressive support troops plan on meaningless
efforts by the occupiers who will then beg Obama for "populist" salvation.
To above-named "Jewess": I hope that your opposition to Obama includes his
(and Congress') support of Israeli war crimes.
I oppose the Israeli(US) occupation and support a sovereign and independent
Government of Palestine. With its own judicial system, its own administrative
system, its own control of building zones and permits, its right to control
its own territories, its own resources (such as water). I oppose ethnic cleansing
and US-Israeli approved opporession and slaughter.
It's too bad if the so-called "settlers" may have to move. They were never legally
there. Like the Puritan "saints" in the early 17th century, the North American
continent was already "settled."
On Native Americans see FACING WEST... by Richard Drinnon.
On political/economic history, see Noam Chomsky's WORLD ORDERS:
OLD AND NEW.
MY EMAIL: peterloeb@yahoo.com
You can't be very liberal or feminist if you're waiting on Barack Obama for your salvation. Or not a very informed one, anyway.
You really should read better. You didn't 'get her' at all.
re: since 1492 -
Traditionally, one out of every ten killed or rendered ineffective is what decimated a group. The working class has been much more than decimated.
What the working class must do is disseminate the facts of this decline and be comprehended on it as widely as possible.
Most of the posts on this article are quite well understood and represented in a video doc called Lifting the Veil. Watch it fully ASAP here: http://player.vimeo.com/video/20355767
For the #Occupiers everywhere --- as well as the rest of us who "get it" and are there in Spirit... Thank you.
--- {Gandhi on Non-Violence } ---
> The first principle of non-violence is the non-compliance with
everything that is humiliating.
> Belief in non-violence is based on the assumption that
human nature in its essence is one and therefore unfailingly
responds to the advances of love.
> Mankind has to get out of violence only through non-violence.
Hatred can be overcome only by love. Counter-hatred only increases
the surface as well as the depth of hatred.
> Human dignity is best preserved not by developing the capacity to
deal destruction but by refusing to retaliate. If it is possible to
train millions in the black art of violence, which is the law of the
Beast, it is more possible to train them in the white art of
non-violence, which is the law of regenerate man.
Obummer Obetrayer Obullshit Oblahblah...who cares. He lied, he's done.
Move on to someone who can hear us.
Does your Rights of the Unborn include the right to not be poisoned in the womb or after birth, to have an oppotunity to live a carcinogen free life?
Do they get to vote?
Do The Rights of the Unborn include the rights of the unwanted unborn to remain unborn? Living life as an unwanted born child is hell.
Also from "The Mahatma:"
There is no half way between truth and non-violence on the one hand and
untruth and violence on the other. We may never be strong enough to be
entirely non-violent in thought, word and deed. But we must keep
non-violence as our goal and make steady progress towards it.
The attainment of freedom, whether for a man, a nation or the world,
must be in exact proportion to the attainment of non-violence by each.
The virtues of mercy, non-violence, love and truth in any man can be
truly tested only when they are pitted against ruthlessness, violence,
hate and untruth.
The sword of the satyagrahi is love, and the unshakable firmness
that comes from it.
M.K. Gandhi
"... and the “terrorists” on that day in 1973 were the Chilean military backed by the CIA"
I am not the first to point out that our intelligence agencies represent the greatest threat to our national security.
''OWS has not yet formed a group consciousness to create Democratic Social Organizations to serve the Nation But Vermont and Montana are creating citizen operated Health Insuranc. And North Dakota has had its own State Bank for over 90 years, which bypasses Wall Street and The Fed. Ithaca New York has a Democratic Social Town Bank. And the nation media is showing their shameful censorship for the whole country to recoil from. United Steel is planning Worker Owned Factories. It's a long journey back to Liberty and justice. We will struggle to end lobbying and to end the Federal Reserve (Which is owned and run by private banks and has no reserves.). Its a lot of work.''-J C Skues --A good Facebook Friend of mine.