Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- When You're Cutting Social Security, 'Wealthy' Begins at $25K
- In Blind Poll, Republicans Choose Progressive Budget Solutions Over Their Own Party's
- Not Guilty By Virtue of Videotape, Which, Unlike the Police, Doesn't Lie
- The 'Land of 10,000 Lakes' Is Running Dry
- Manning: Before Wikileaks, Leaked Docs Offered to NYT, WaPo
- Yoga Wlll Turn Kids Into Godless Sun-Worshipping Pagans, Lawsuit Charges
- The 'Land of 10,000 Lakes' Is Running Dry
- Big Winner in Italian Election? The Five Star Movement
- A Better Plan Than 'Endless Growth': Enough Is Enough
- In Blind Poll, Republicans Choose Progressive Budget Solutions Over Their Own Party's
Popular content
Today's Top News
Why the Elites Are in Trouble
Ketchup, a petite 22-year-old from Chicago with wavy red hair and glasses with bright red frames, arrived in Zuccotti Park in New York on Sept. 17. She had a tent, a rolling suitcase, 40 dollars’ worth of food, the graphic version of Howard Zinn’s “A People’s History of the United States” and a sleeping bag. She had no return ticket, no idea what she was undertaking, and no acquaintances among the stragglers who joined her that afternoon to begin the Wall Street occupation. She decided to go to New York after reading the Canadian magazine Adbusters, which called for the occupation, although she noted that when she got to the park Adbusters had no discernable presence.
The lords of finance in the looming towers surrounding the park, who toy with money and lives, who make the political class, the press and the judiciary jump at their demands, who destroy the ecosystem for profit and drain the U.S. Treasury to gamble and speculate, took little notice of Ketchup or any of the other scruffy activists on the street below them. The elites consider everyone outside their sphere marginal or invisible. And what significance could an artist who paid her bills by working as a waitress have for the powerful? What could she and the others in Zuccotti Park do to them? What threat can the weak pose to the strong? Those who worship money believe their buckets of cash, like the $4.6 million JPMorgan Chase gave a few days ago to the New York City Police Foundation, can buy them perpetual power and security. Masters all, kneeling before the idols of the marketplace, blinded by their self-importance, impervious to human suffering, bloated from unchecked greed and privilege, they were about to be taught a lesson in the folly of hubris.
Even now, three weeks later, elites, and their mouthpieces in the press, continue to puzzle over what people like Ketchup want. Where is the list of demands? Why don’t they present us with specific goals? Why can’t they articulate an agenda?
The goal to people like Ketchup is very, very clear. It can be articulated in one word—REBELLION. These protesters have not come to work within the system. They are not pleading with Congress for electoral reform. They know electoral politics is a farce and have found another way to be heard and exercise power. They have no faith, nor should they, in the political system or the two major political parties. They know the press will not amplify their voices, and so they created a press of their own. They know the economy serves the oligarchs, so they formed their own communal system. This movement is an effort to take our country back.
This is a goal the power elite cannot comprehend. They cannot envision a day when they will not be in charge of our lives. The elites believe, and seek to make us believe, that globalization and unfettered capitalism are natural law, some kind of permanent and eternal dynamic that can never be altered. What the elites fail to realize is that rebellion will not stop until the corporate state is extinguished. It will not stop until there is an end to the corporate abuse of the poor, the working class, the elderly, the sick, children, those being slaughtered in our imperial wars and tortured in our black sites. It will not stop until foreclosures and bank repossessions stop. It will not stop until students no longer have to go into debt to be educated, and families no longer have to plunge into bankruptcy to pay medical bills. It will not stop until the corporate destruction of the ecosystem stops, and our relationships with each other and the planet are radically reconfigured. And that is why the elites, and the rotted and degenerate system of corporate power they sustain, are in trouble. That is why they keep asking what the demands are. They don’t understand what is happening. They are deaf, dumb and blind.
(photo: hunter.gatherer)
“The world can’t continue on its current path and survive,” Ketchup told me. “That idea is selfish and blind. It’s not sustainable. People all over the globe are suffering needlessly at our hands.”
The occupation of Wall Street has formed an alternative community that defies the profit-driven hierarchical structures of corporate capitalism. If the police shut down the encampment in New York tonight, the power elite will still lose, for this vision and structure have been imprinted into the thousands of people who have passed through park, renamed Liberty Plaza by the protesters. The greatest gift the occupation has given us is a blueprint for how to fight back. And this blueprint is being transferred to cities and parks across the country.
“We get to the park,” Ketchup says of the first day. “There’s madness for a little while. There were a lot of people. They were using megaphones at first. Nobody could hear. Then someone says we should get into circles and talk about what needed to happen, what we thought we could accomplish. And so that’s what we did. There was a note-taker in each circle. I don’t know what happened with those notes, probably nothing, but it was a good start. One person at a time, airing your ideas. There was one person saying that he wasn’t very hopeful about what we could accomplish here, that he wasn’t very optimistic. And then my response was that, well, we have to be optimistic, because if anybody’s going to get anything done, it’s going be us here. People said different things about what our priorities should be. People were talking about the one-demand idea. Someone called for AIG executives to be prosecuted. There was someone who had come from Spain to be there, saying that she was here to help us avoid the mistakes that were made in Spain. It was a wide spectrum. Some had come because of their own personal suffering or what they saw in the world.”
“After the circles broke I felt disheartened because it was sort of chaotic,” she said. “I didn’t have anybody there, so it was a little depressing. I didn’t know what was going to happen.”
“Over the past few months, people had been meeting in New York City general assembly,” she said. “One of them is named Brooke. She’s a professor of social ecology. She did my facilitation training. There’s her and a lot of other people, students, school teachers, different people who were involved with that … so they organized a general assembly.”
“It’s funny that the cops won’t let us use megaphones, because it’s to make our lives harder, but we actually end up making a much louder sound [with the “people’s mic”] and I imagine it’s much more annoying to the people around us,” she said. “I had been in the back, unable to hear. I walked to different parts of the circle. I saw this man talking in short phrases and people were repeating them. I don’t know whose idea it was, but that started on the first night. The first general assembly was a little chaotic because people had no idea … a general assembly, what is this for? At first it was kind of grandstanding about what were our demands. Ending corporate personhood is one that has come up again and again as a favorite and. … What ended up happening was, they said, OK, we’re going to break into work groups.
“People were worried we were going to get kicked out of the park at 10 p.m. This was a major concern. There were tons of cops. I’ve heard that it’s costing the city a ton of money to have constant surveillance on a bunch of peaceful protesters who aren’t hurting anyone. With the people’s mic, everything we do is completely transparent. We know there are undercover cops in the crowd. I think I was talking to one last night, but it’s like, what are you trying to accomplish? We don’t have any secrets.”
“The undercover cops are the only ones who ask, ‘Who’s the leader?’ ” she said. “Presumably, if they know who our leaders are they can take them out. The fact is we have no leader. There’s no leader, so there’s nothing they can do.
“There was a woman [in the medics unit]. This guy was pretending to be a reporter. The first question he asks is, ‘Who’s the leader?’ She goes, ‘I’m the leader.’ And he says, ‘Oh yeah, what are you in charge of?’ She says, ‘I’m in a charge of everything.’ He says, ‘Oh yeah? What’s your title?’ She says ‘God.’ ”
“So it’s 9:30 p.m. and people are worried that they’re going to try and rush us out of the camp,” she said, referring back to the first day. “At 9:30 they break into work groups. I joined the group on contingency plans. The job of the bedding group was to find cardboard for people to sleep on. The contingency group had to decide what to do if they kick us out. The big decision we made was to announce to the group that if we were dispersed we were going to meet back at 10 a.m. the next day in the park. Another group was arts and culture. What was really cool was that we assumed we were going to be there more than one night. There was a food group. They were going dumpster diving. The direct action committee plans for direct, visible action like marches. There was a security team. It’s security against the cops. The cops are the only people we think that might hurt us. The security team keeps people awake in shifts. They always have people awake.”
The work groups make logistical decisions, and the general assembly makes large policy decisions.
“Work groups make their own decisions,” Ketchup said. “For example, someone donated a laptop. And because I’ve been taking minutes I keep running around and asking, ‘Does someone have a laptop I could borrow?’ The media team, upon receiving that laptop, designated it to me for my use on behalf of the Internet committee. The computer isn’t mine. When I go back to Chicago, I’m not going to take it. Right now I don’t even know where it is. Someone else is using it. But so, after hearing this, people thought it had been gifted to me personally. People were upset by that. So a member of the Internet work group went in front of the group and said, ‘This is a need of the committee. It’s been put into Ketchup’s care.’ They explained that to the group, but didn’t ask for consensus on it, because the committees are empowered. Some people might still think that choice was inappropriate. In the future, it might be handled differently.”
Working groups blossomed in the following days. The media working group was joined by a welcome working group for new arrivals, a sanitation working group (some members of which go around the park on skateboards as they carry brooms), a legal working group with lawyers, an events working group, an education working group, medics, a facilitation working group (which trains new facilitators for the general assembly meetings), a public relations working group, and an outreach working group for like-minded communities as well as the general public. There is an Internet working group and an open source technology working group. The nearby McDonald’s is the principal bathroom for the park after Burger King banned protesters from its facilities.
Caucuses also grew up in the encampment, including a “Speak Easy caucus.” “That’s a caucus I started,” Ketchup said. “It is for a broad spectrum of individuals from female-bodied people who identify as women to male-bodied people who are not traditionally masculine. That’s called the ‘Speak Easy’ caucus. I was just talking to a woman named Sharon who’s interested in starting a caucus for people of color.
“A caucus gives people a safe space to talk to each other without people from the culture of their oppressors present. It gives them greater power together, so that if the larger group is taking an action that the caucus felt was specifically against their interests, then the caucus can block that action. Consensus can potentially still be reached after a caucus blocks something, but a block, or a ‘paramount objection,’ is really serious. You’re saying that you are willing to walk out.”
“We’ve done a couple of things so far,” she said. “So, you know the live stream? The comments are moderated on the live stream. There are moderators who remove racist comments, comments that say ‘I hate cops’ or ‘Kill cops.’ They remove irrelevant comments that have nothing to do with the movement. There is this woman who is incredibly hardworking and intelligent. She has been the driving force of the finance committee. Her hair is half-blond and half-black. People were referring to her as “blond-black hottie.” These comments weren’t moderated, and at one point whoever was running the camera took the camera off her face and did a body scan. So, that was one of the first things the caucus talked about. We decided as a caucus that I would go to the moderators and tell them this is a serious problem. If you’re moderating other offensive comments then you need to moderate these kinds of offensive comments.”
The heart of the protest is the two daily meetings, held in the morning and the evening. The assemblies, which usually last about two hours, start with a review of process, which is open to change and improvement, so people are clear about how the assembly works. Those who would like to speak raise their hand and get on “stack.”
“There’s a stack keeper,” Ketchup said. “The stack keeper writes down your name or some signifier for you. A lot of white men are the people raising their hands. So, anyone who is not apparently a white man gets to jump stack. The stack keeper will make note of the fact that the person who put their hand up was not a white man and will arrange the list so that it’s not dominated by white men. People don’t get called up in the same order as they raise their hand.”
While someone is speaking, their words amplified by the people’s mic, the crowd responds through hand signals.
“Putting your fingers up like this,” she said, holding her hands up and wiggling her fingers, “means you like what you’re hearing, or you’re in agreement. Like this,” she said, holding her hands level and wiggling her fingers, “means you don’t like it so much. Fingers down, you don’t like it at all; you’re not in agreement. Then there’s this triangle you make with your hand that says ‘point of process.’ So, if you think that something is not being respected within the process that we’ve agreed to follow then you can bring that up.”
“You wait till you’re called,” she said. “These rules get abused all the time, but they are important. We start with agenda items, which are proposals or group discussions. Then working group report-backs, so you know what every working group is doing. Then we have general announcements. The agenda items have been brought to the facilitators by the working groups because you need the whole group to pay attention. Like last night, Legal brought up a discussion on bail: ‘Can we agree that the money from the general funds can be allotted if someone needs bail?’ And the group had to come to consensus on that. [It decided yes.] There’s two co-facilitators, a stack keeper, a timekeeper, a vibes-person making sure that people are feeling OK, that people’s voices aren’t getting stomped on, and then if someone’s being really disruptive, the vibes-person deals with them. There’s a note-taker—I end up doing that a lot because I type very, very quickly. We try to keep the facilitation team one man, one woman, or one female-bodied person, one male-bodied person. When you facilitate multiple times it’s rough on your brain. You end up having a lot of criticism thrown your way. You need to keep the facilitators rotating as much as possible. It needs to be a huge, huge priority to have a strong facilitation group.”
“People have been yelled out of the park,” she said. “Someone had a sign the other day that said ‘Kill the Jew Bankers.’ They got screamed out of the park. Someone else had a sign with the N-word on it. That person’s sign was ripped up, but that person is apparently still in the park.
“We’re trying to make this a space that everyone can join. This is something the caucuses are trying to really work on. We are having workshops to get people to understand their privilege.”
But perhaps the most important rule adopted by the protesters is nonviolence and nonaggression against the police, no matter how brutal the police become.
“The cops, I think, maced those women in the face and expected the men and women around them to start a riot,” Ketchup said. “They want a riot. They can deal with a riot. They cannot deal with nonviolent protesters with cameras.”
I tell Ketchup I will bring her my winter sleeping bag. It is getting cold. She will need it. I leave her in a light drizzle and walk down Broadway. I pass the barricades, uniformed officers on motorcycles, the rows of paddy wagons and lines of patrol cars that block the streets into the financial district and surround the park. These bankers, I think, have no idea what they are up against.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



164 Comments so far
Show AllI think it's too soon to call for a general strike. The general public is only just beginning to hear about Occupy Wall Street, and the majority support it in principle. Occupy Together really took off when the video of those 4 young women being pepper sprayed went viral on the internet. What we need is outrage, and the general public isn't there yet. But as things move forward, events may create that outrage. And not necessarily an outcome of the occupation, but perhaps something that turns public attention and energy to it.
In my opinion, Anthony Bologna's action started a revolution, but in the earliest stage, aggregation appears disorganized and. formless. And it is. But it is organic.
They can't use tents: NYC ordinance. But it's not "obedience;" rather, it's practicality: Are tents needed for an occupation? Yes, they'd be nice to have; but no, they aren't needed. I suggest following their actions through their main website, http://nycga.cc/
Indeed: Start with a sit-in of the NYSE then move on to a General Strike.
Rosemarie: I agree! The only way they listen and make the needed changes the public requires and needs is when they lose vast sums of money and more importantly, when the people refuse to work for them. Our labor is our most valuable asset, and once we withhold it, they can't operate. Yep, only medical, fire, and essential services stay working.
I attended a labor workshop at a college in Oakland, Ca in June, and addressed the issue of the 'General Strike', and shutting down commerce in the U.S. (As much as we can) until they meet our demands, most of which the Common Dreams bloggers agree on. Single Payer health care, EFCA, guaranteed and funded defined pensions, bringing the "troops home" and ending the U.S. agenda for imperial empire, and a 75 % reduction in the military budget, enforced environmental regulations, a repeal of all the un-constitutional bills and legislation passed... starting with the Patriot Act, and fund public education adequately from kindergarten through graduate school, and voiding the college loans our kids had to take out for higher education. I can go on, and CDers can add to the list. An uphill battle for sure, but one worth the fight!
The 7 magic words of working-class people, (white-collar as well as blue-collar and non-union as well as union) are:
"TAKE TO THE STREETS, WITHHOLD YOUR LABOR." (peacefully)
Nobody scabs the picket line! We help each other out with food, shelter, clothing, money, whatever. "All for one and one for all!"
Time to quit begging for a few little crumbs. Occupy Wall Street is just the beginning. The movement is spreading across America and throughout the world.
As Victor Hugo once said: "The most powerful thing is an IDEA whose time has come!"
When Chris Hedges starts sounding hopeful you better believe something is up.
I find it ironic that the protesters have turned McDonald's into their personal shithouse. Bad luck for the janitor though.
but but but . . . isn't that what McDonald's is for? Surely nobody would want to eat there!
Ah...., but OWS is resonsible and has tasked people to clean up for the occupiers's using McDonalds's facilities!!
I'd love to see the protesters get some low band pirate radio gear setup - then speakers could be heard on any radio bandwidth not taken by a regular radio Station.
It's easy to set up. A pirate radio station that shoots a signal a few miles or so - obviously less than that in the concrete jungle.
But then any individual could simply tune a portable radio or their cell phones to the station and wa-la - the speakers could easily be heard.
You can run one of those pirate radio stations on a car battery.
Great idea! Contact your local occupy group.
http://www.freeradio.org/
Includes a list with all the plans and materials needed to set up a local rado station.
Radio Free Wall Street!
I really hope this is a turning point for the U.S. I'm still not seeing the linkage of the god-forsaken wars to the current economic situation in very many of the articles I read. It seems like the wars are a hands-off topic. It's good to see something galvanize even a small portion of the U.S. population, since killing hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and Afghanis and causing the deaths of over 6,000 of our own military have not been enough to move people to the streets. True to U.S. values if the issue is about money, or lack of it, people will react.
I hope this movement succeeds. As a vetern of many anti-war demonstrations and actions from 2001 - 2010, I'm not real hopeful that we as Americans can care about very much outside our own backyards. Of course, if those backyards are being re-po'd then I guess there's cause for action. I hate to be negative and cynical, however, I'm pretty ashamed of my fellow Americans and our lack of morality when it comes to war.
This is not a time to be ashamed, but rather heartened. I highly recommend that you go to the nearest occupy meeting, rally, GA. You will discover, many people who share your views. This is a time to heal, to gather, and to build. Don't miss the point, also, that focusing on money, the distribution of such, and the power it yields, is exactly the fight, that needs to be fought, to end corporate dominance that profits from war. That is not lost on this movement, regarding the philosophical underpinnings. This is your movement too. Join it.
............silver spoon in hand....but when the tax man comes to the door.........the house looking like a rummage sale......
keep on rockin in the free world.........
it's alright ma.......i'm only sighin..........
how long can it last?
the physical end - police clamping down, winter, etc. etc. is not the actual end. this is a lifelong commitment and the ripples of ows have the power of a tsunami.
long vision - thanks
"The greatest gift the occupation has given us is a blueprint for how to fight back. And this blueprint is being transferred to cities and parks across the country."
For those looking for an explanation of the blueprint of the architecture of successful change please read:
The fundamental difference between the 20th Century and the 21st Century lies in the architecture of change.
Change in the 20th Century was CENTRALIZED. It is represented by a triangle where power rests in the hands of the few at the top, and was dictated downward to the People.
Change in the 21st Century is DECENTRALIZED. It is represented by an inverted triangle where power rests with the people at the top.
The architecture if the Internet is one of DECENTRALIZATION. Now, each participating Citizen is a publisher. The DECENTRALIZED change process is vitalized by free and open communication. A VISION results from the free and open communication when the majority of the participants adopt an idea or concept ( VISION ) in their minds and hearts. VISIONS are FLUID and will change as the minds and hearts of the majority change.
The speed of change spikes complexity. CENTRALIZED entities lack the numbers of intellectual talent to compete with DECENTRALIZED intellectual talent (people) when making decisions. In hyper-culture CENTRALIZED decision making derails and fails, whereas, DECENTRALIZED decision making brings order out of chaos. The fundamental difference lies in the great numbers of people participating and sharing their ideas and beliefs.
In a World of hyper-change decentralized decision making is essential not only for survival but also to thrive. Essentially more cooperation and less competition are needed in order to establish a new system. To thrive in the 21st Century we need each other in ways not necessary in the 20th Century.
Today’s media is entrenched in centralized organizations and 20th Century thinking; therefore, their reporting has been confused. They don’t get it! The OCCUPY revolution is deeply decentralized and EVERY PARTICIPANT IS A LEADER. This process is highly useful when attempting to change or transcend the status quo. If one leader is isolated or eliminated by the status quo it has little effect because each person is a leader and each person has adopted the vision, so the revolution continues.
Another advantage of a decentralized revolution is that no outside entity can take it over. This is important. Political organizations or infiltrators have little effect on the revolution because the vision is so widely understood and shared by the participants that the vision cannot be corrupted, even by propaganda and dis-information. A vision developed by the majority of people will survive traditional attempts to derail it.
Goals are a centralized decision making process. Visions are more complex and result from decentralized decision making. Many people feel that the current governmental and economic systems are so corrupt as to be unchangeable. Decentralized change can transcend the current system and establish a new system, and new pathways to better lifeways. One good example of this is the concept of sustainable living.
No one yet knows the shape of the future. What is sure is the pathway to that future. It is in the process of being envisioned by cooperating participating Citizens. As visions are developed and implemented, the old will be transcended as the visions take hold. We are on a pathway to inventing the future, a future that will unveil itself as we proceed. Trust the young for the future is theirs.
Finally, this is not a political movement to be exploited by media types for profit. This revolution derives from a deeper place, is broad based, and cannot be used to divide us. Mother Nature wired us all differently to achieve a balance. If respect is accorded to all then her natural balance will be achieved. Everyone is welcome to participate in this revolution and the greater the participation the more meaningful and balanced will be the results. Seek to act with peace and harmony as the system is transformed. It is not necessary to respond to negativism because one’s response only strengthens the negative. The power of this decentralized transformation is too strong to waste time responding to negativism. Instead, welcome the negativism for it too is a part of the balance.
One caution, history suggests that a blackshirt or brownshirt movement may emerge in an attempt to seize power and negate the revolution. The difference today is that the speed of communication allows for quick mobilization to counter and defeat such actions. A readiness to do so is important. Peaceful resistance to such efforts are essential.
In conclusion, decentralized action via new communications is key, visions are formed and adopted as the revolution progresses, transcending and not challenging the current corrupt political and economic system through social action is important, each participant is a leader, a reinvention of life in a sustainable environment will be the outcome. The old politics will die in it’s own rot and the new politics will have to run hard to catch up to the transformative outcomes to become meaningful.
I absolutely loved this article. Something big is happening. My favorite bit was:-
"We know there are undercover cops in the crowd. ... The undercover cops are the only ones who ask, ‘Who’s the leader?’. Presumably, if they know who our leaders are they can take them out. The fact is we have no leader. There’s no leader, so there’s nothing they can do.
Yeah, if anyone asks you who is your leader, you know they have ulterior motives!
First: Can we please stop calling rich people "elites"? They're NOT elite. They have a lot of money. If that's the sole measurement of human worth, we're in worse trouble than we thought. Call them rich, over-wealthy, pirates, banksters, entrepreneurs, whatever. But please, STOP CALLING THEM "ELITE".
Second, it's long been my thought that commodification as a framework for viewing the world is one of the key problems we have to undo.
The "Bottom Line" that Milton Friedmann invented for his Rockefeller paycheck back in the 50s is a lie taught to every business degree student since then. But the true "bottom line" is the Life Force. Without it, even the mightiest CEO is nothing but bones in a box. Without it, this planet is just another naked rock hurtling through space.
And if you change that one idea- about "The Bottom Line"- everything else changes with it.
If respecting and valuing Life is your bottom line, you'll act in ways that preserve that treasure, using your resources in that way as well. Things like "welfare programs" and "environmentalism" take their rightful place as central to the holism of social well-being, rather than as an addendum to a "machine" based society.
Greed is a derivative form of fear, and a mental illness. Those suffering from it are under the illusion that they are defending themselves against/pre-emptively attacking the sources of their fear of lack.
However those who succeed within our existing, mostly-broken system via rabidly selfish behaviors cannot understand the perspective of people who do not. They honestly CANNOT SEE that the system is broken for more people than it works for [them] because that makes the terrifying revelation of their illusions too clear, too immanent. Everybody treasures their illusions until they no longer can be ignored, mistaking them for "reality", it's a normal human failure. But changing perspective is terrifying when one's worldview is predicated on fearmongering, and so proposing change is a personal threat to these folks.
The mentally ill greedy people will feel at terrible risk when forced to recognize that their "superiority" is ultimately illusory. No hearses with luggage racks, and etc., no magical chachkas will render them Supermen [Ayn Rand aside]. At the moment when that understanding reaches them, their world will change. They'll either get some enlightenment and perhaps some empathy, or freak out and collapse.
Simultaneously, those who hope will always wind up scaring the bejeebus out of those who fear [are greedy], because Hope refuses to think inside the boxes Fear builds to define- and try to control- the world. Hope is revolution, hope is change, hope is what drives Humanity to better ourselves.
Hope conquers fear, and these kids are hope on legs. They deserve our thanks and love for their courage. As does the author of this article, which was very well done.
I grew up in Frankfort, Michigan. It's not a very famous place, but it is sort of a Cape Cod of the Midwest. Population 1200 in winter, 30,000 in summer. The wealthy of Chicago, Detroit, St. Louis, etc. had summer homes there. As a teenager I was able to join the same clubs as the kids whose families had cottages and in some cases sprawling estates like you might see in Palm Beach, FL. Some of the kids were from billionaire families you have heard of like the Duponts or Dows or families not so known as the Mellons or Laidlaws (publishing). Financially elite, yes. Smarter, wiser, naturally more talented? No. So I was fortunate early on to learn that despite having money to burn and attending Exeter or Andover in the winter these kids put their pants on the same way as me. For what it's worth, I was blessed with good genes and had intrinsic abilities that money could not buy that those rich kids just couldn't get. It was an important lesson.
I think, in part, that gives me the understanding I have that tells me that yes, the Wall Street types have power and money, but the are not necessarily so smart and are certainly capable of making idiotic decisions despite their privileged positions.
I am thinking of one billionaire kid who bragged about being caught selling pot out of his dorm room at Andover. His dad probably had to make a big contribution to the endowment to keep John Hilton in school. Obviously John didn't need the money. He was trying to be cool but was just being stupid. These are the same people who are running Wall Street today. The insiders. Protected by privilege but idiots just the same.
My experience too heavyrunner. I grew up poor, and thought that rich people must be smarter or something, until I started meeting them through my "elite" high school. The kids in my housing project were funnier, brighter, more talented and inventive with words, music and dancing than those I met later whose dads had lots of money. It was kind of shocking how dull the rich can be.
" The fact is we have no leader ". There is a scene in the movie Spartacus, where the Roman soldiers ask his followers: " which one of you is Spartacus " ? And they all answer: " I am Spartacus; I am Spartacus; I am Spartacus "! That is the tactic that should be used by the #OWS protesters anytime anyone asks you: Who is your leader? One person get up front of the protesters and says: I am the leader, and the whole crowd repeats: I am the leader; I am the leader; I am the leader!
That is a wonderful idea!!
The weight of the boot on our faces endlessly stomping ( from Orwell's 1984) has become too much bear. Unlike the Vietnam or even the Iraq war protests this REBELLION as Chris calls it is about the future of our society. If the mostly young don't stand and fight now they will be consigned to an increasingly desperate state of serfdom by a few thousand people in the building in Downtown Manhattan and a few other centers of the Capitalist faith world-wide.
The capitalist system is like a giant tentacled monster sucking the life blood of human beings and the planet. Green ($) blood runs through it's veins.
It releases a potent hallucinogen called consumeritol which turns us into helpless drones, working our butts off senselessly to keep it alive.
But it wasn't always a monster. It used to be a great workhorse and we had a symbiotic relationship with it. We fed it and in return it raised our standard of living. But it's no longer our friend. We have created a monster and we must destroy it before it kills us all.
The Occupy US movement is a great step. But to really force the monster to release it's grip we need to hit it where it hurts the most. We need to cut off it's supply of green blood. We need a massive global effort to starve the beast, not the government, as the the tea-partiers are fond of saying, but the shameless greedy capitalists. We've got to remove the tentacles, one by one. Refuse to participate in mindless consumerism, shop locally and at small shops, boycott, transfer your savings to credit unions, shop at co-ops, start co-ops, start worker-owned companies These are our weapons. Do this on a massive scale and the monster will surely start to release it's grip. Eventually it will either wither away or change back into the workhorse it used to be. No need to drive a stake into it's greedy heart in violent revolution, just refuse to feed it as much as you can.
Brilliant! As is every piece ever written by Chris Hedges. The awakening scares the elites which is the reason why they have worked so earnestly & for so long to keep people stupid, brainwashed and compliant. I remember watching Michael Moore's "Capitalism a Love Story" and picking up on their fear in one obscure tidbit in the documentary that most probably missed. It was when MM went to Wall Street with his team and there was a very small protest going on. The camera captured the protesters and it went up to the buildings were the rats were gathered around the windows, looking down on the small protest and the look on their faces spoke volumes: they were worried, they were scared! I remember saying to myself, look at that, they're actually threatened by a few dozen people what would those cowards do if thousands of aggrieved citizens take to the streets? Remember Tahrir Square. The Egyptians were able to come together as one, overcome their believes and feelings and oust a sanguine dictator, we can do the same thing! We are the 99%!
The Elites are in trouble? In what world does this author live? They are doing just fine and getting one hell of a laugh at the rest of the world.
You seem WAY too happy about it, although I don't buy "it".
“The undercover cops are the only ones who ask, ‘Who’s the leader?’ ” she said. “Presumably, if they know who our leaders are they can take them out. The fact is we have no leader. There’s no leader, so there’s nothing they can do."
Direct democracy in action!
Yes, Chris, "The Elites Are in Trouble" today -- because their previously well disguised, camouflaged, hidden, and Two-Party "Vichy" Empire is now becoming visible for the violent and viscous global Empire that it is, and the Empire is being recognized as the cancerous tumor that is the proximate cause of all the issues that Occupy is exposing and protesting against, like; massive economic inequality and oppression of we 99%, global environmental destruction, numerous and growing imperialist wars abroad, a spying lying police-state at home, arrogant authoritarianism instead of democracy, etc. etc.
As Hannah Arendt famously warned from her painful experience with the last wannabe global empire, the Nazi Empire,
"Empire abroad entails tyranny at home".
Now a growing percentage of Americans realize what the tortured masses in the Empire's oil territories have long known:
"Globalization" is just a PR cover-term for violent 'global Empire' --- so the global elite of this deadly global Empire are indeed "in trouble" today, Chris.
Alan MacDonald
Liberty & democracy
over
violent/Vichy
empire
Beautiful.
In This Age
In this age, when freedom is struggling to be
Born before darkness falls,
What sacrifice
Can I make, to lift up
Those who have less than I,
To embolden those whose courage
Is sorely tested (and why does this have to be?)
And reach out from my soul
Through the visible and invisible
Kinship with life that lies,
Forgotten,
Within each and every heart and mind,
Each touch, each spoken word,
Each thought, so violent have they all become.
In this age, when truth is battling to be
Heard before silence falls,
What offering
Can I make, to soothe
Those whose wounds are greater than mine
To ease those whose faith
Is damaged beyond repair (and who will be accountable?)
And sing a song from long ago
That through our common roots
All creatures will know,
Remember,
Resonating in our bones, our breath
Our blood, our sap,
Our children, blessed may they be.
In this age, when the debt of justice
Must be paid,
What declaration
Can I make, to rectify
The dead who cannot speak
To bring salvation to those whose hope
Has turned cold (and how did we become heartless?)
And praise those who are truly worthy
Who in times past were shining lights
That guided others to the distant shore,
Together,
Our brothers, our sisters, our parents
Our husbands, our wives
Angels, all of them.
Nice. Very nice. Thanks for sharing.
From Ketchup's description, the whole process sounds very similar to a Green Party Convention/Conference, which really isn't surprising as the Green 's have always been about bottom->up processes revolving around consensus building that enables a wide spectrum for inclusion. However, I do find it odd that I'm the first to comment on those aspects of the OWSTR project.
Has everyone seen this:
October 6, 2011
CBC
Chris Hedges Interview
http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/News/TV_Shows/Lang_&_O%27Leary_Exchange/1308689786/ID=2149202610
Thanks Chris for letting us know how it works. Thank you Occupiers of Wall Street and of All Cities. Show us by your example how to live sanely and in harmony again. The moneyeds have thrown us all so out of balance and for thousands of years stolen our identities, our cultures only to replace it with their vampiric system. We need to live as closely knit tribal communities again.
Chris Hedges notes that, "The goal to people like Ketchup is very, very clear. It can be articulated in one word—REBELLION."
He continues to articulate that the goal of the "movement is an effort to take our country back."
So with these comments, opinions, journalistic reports, Hedges seems to have at least begun a movement toward a somewhat defined, or as he says "articulated", discussion of how the goals or demands of the Occupy movement might be appreciated and thought about --- even if the whole scope of this organic and self-forming movement should not be constrained or 'framed', but rather are 'inclusive' of everything that the 99% of Occupy include in their own commitment to this movement.
This is fair enough as a starting point for rational thought and discussion, and will perhaps lead to a further "articulation" that does not encumber, but rather frees, the Occupy rebellion to gather strength and avoid being dismissed as being only one thing, one issue, one agenda.
While the tactical benefits of such a holistic view of revolutionary values gains more strength now for open and inclusive recruitment today, the time may come when the Occupy movement/rebellion, as a truly mass movement could benefit from a more refined and more fully 'articulated' strategy.
In this later vain, Hedges initial articulations of the one-word goal "Rebellion" and the four word phrase, "take back our country", may benefit from being clarified with an explanation of "Rebellion" from what?, and "take back our country" from what?
To the extent that such a future advantage and benefit to the actualization of the Occupy movement's goals can best be realized by rational and commonly held articulation of the goals that Hedges has initially suggested, I am hopeful that Hedges himself would complete such goal statements with the whole goal ideas; Rebellion from Empire, and take our country back from Empire.
Alan MacDonald
Liberty & democracy
over
violent/Vichy
empire
Wow.... I really wish I could be there..... I am trying to do my own part....by spreading all the information I can....this weekend I left more articles at the laundry mat.... plus the sheet with the little squares for websites and authors, mostly environmentalists....I need tomake a bigger list.....I'll add you Chris..
Heartwarming indeed. Ketchup is the best representation I've had in my 34 years of being of voting age. I've been getting to know the local occupation here in San Diego, and there too, the process is an offshoot of that organic process that sprouted this movement. We have our movement people, lets move it.
"I found Gandhi to be an extraordinary blend of the appreciation of the inner life and superlative social action.
"He was able to integrate inner spiritual work, sensitivity to the suffering of the poor and disenfranchised, and masterful use of skillful political means to bring about social change."
----- From an exquisite book by Ram Dass and Mirabai Bush -
Compassion in Action
The world needs more Chris Hedges and Ketchups.
Great piece Chris. You are clearly a leading voice of resistance of our time. I am old enough to have been one of the 3,000 protesters at Grant Park in Chicago in the summer of 1968. The huge movement against the Viet Nam war grew out of those protests in part because of the leadership of the Chicago 8 who were prosecuted for leading those demonstrations. There were other important leaders of the movement like the Berrigan brothers and later Daniel Ellsberg. John Lennon and the Beatles helped. Elldridge Cleaver and Huey Newton were important too. Dr. Martin Luther King and the Kennedys were huge.
Chris I have been trying to think of someone in the leadership from those days for whom you represent a parallel today. You are becoming equal to many of those in stature, but are both a combination of the virtues of many of them but also possess a unique character all your own. But I don't think there is a more important voice than yours on the scene today.
I love a young woman named Ketchup now whom I have never met or seen thanks to your beautiful piece illustrating the inner workings of the Occupy movement. I am starting to think that human brilliance and creativeness has finally begun to devise strategies of dissent which are overcoming the Orwellian tactics of the secret government which shattered our movement after the end of the Viet Nam war and the draft.
Thank you Chris for chronicling this important evolution for us.
As a staunch conservative, please allow me to respectfully describe what I see from my point of view.
I see a group of people who, when presented with reality as it is, are upset that reality doesn't meet their own preconceptions of "fairness" and "equality". I see a group of people who become enraged when finding out that someone in a position of economic power has the "audacity" to earn a profit to reinvest in human capital for the company they helm, or perhaps that "evil profit" will be reinvested into a company line that makes a product you enjoy less expensive to produce... Passing that savings on to the consumer.
I see a group of people that would rather they be included in the "taking of what belongs to all of us" than have the "taking" stop at a cultural level. Strange to think that people are upset at the thought of someone "stealing" what "belongs to everyone". Hmmm.... Can one have theft is there is no private property? Perhaps we should remember "Thou shall not steal" and teach it to our children. Even if we think that stealing "back" what was "taking from everyone" is still stealing.
I see a group of people that are *expecting* to be provided for free, which the work and effort of others provide. To clothe them, feed them, provide them with means of communication, provide them housing, educate them, care from them when they are ill. Unless these people want a *moneyless* society, where everyone works for what someone else deems "fair" for them to earn, obtaining from others what someone else deems "fair" for them to obtain.
I see a group of people that apparently have the finances to take off of work and protest the types of corporations they work for on other days. Not *everyone* is the entrepreneur/artist marching to their own drum.
I see a group of people that take themselves and their ‘pet causes’ far too seriously. It makes most of us simply do our best to ignore you. Not because your ‘pet cause’ isn’t valid in its own right, but because you simply don’t shut up about it and let us breathe. This effect is multiplied because every ‘pet cause’ of all “progressivism”, which we are to pay our upmost attention to at all times, is akin to listening to every blade of grass growing in the country.
We are oft apathetic because you never bring rest to our ears, but only noise. We are numb to your causes by your own hands and voices.
WhI see a group of people that held signs during TARP reading “Where’s my bailout!” instead of “Don’t bailout the banks! Let them fail!” Instead of demanding everyone keeping our own tax dollars and no bank or auto company receive them on an unmerited basis, you add yourself to the list of unmerited recipients.
I see a group of people that demand what they haven't worked for. Who are covetous enough and jealous of someone else's gains through hard work. A group of people, who don't spend enough time realizing that sometimes THEY are "the other" which they so vehemently denigrate.
I see a group of people who fail to realize the recipients ability to receive assistance ends with the providers ability to render such assistance. If you are hungry, I could feed you only if I have food I choose to give. If I have no food, then neither of us eat.
I see a group of people genuinely upset when someone else doesn't rescue them from their own folly. Failing to get the "dull 9 to 5 job" in their 20's to pay the bills and save for a rainy day when it inevitably hits in their 30's and 40's.
You claim to speak for "the 99%". I would be included in that group were it not for my abhorrence of the values you espouse. I see a culture that decries cheating, but focuses on stamping out cheating (called “economic justice” or “social justice”) to the degree that our common culture no longer rewards one's own hard work.
I see a group of people that would rather see "the 1%" as evil, and a group to "bring down" instead of seeing "the 1%" as a group to be held to "walk the talk". I see a group of people that have no idea what "leading by quiet example" means. I see a group that apparently doesn't know what "quiet" means.
I see a group that would “destroy the corrupt system”, and has forgotten the system they rail against is the system they and their ideological forefathers put in place.
I see a group that would tear down because they have apparently forgotten how to build.
You don't speak for me and the great swath of people in this country (you can think of us as the rubes living in “Jesusland” if you like) that look at you, and shake their head at the loss of culture in this country.
I see a group of people, while meaning well, are so enamored about what reality might just possibly be, they lack the understanding of how reality actually functions. They haven't seriously thought about the ramifications of their actions, and how disastrous those actions would be if they came to fruition.
The Iron Lady said it best "Eventually, you run out of other people's money to spend." We conservatives are trying to bring that to you attention, and you refuse to listen.
I have read what you describe as your point of view.
I see a person who would not recognize reality if it were to descend upon him and sink its bloody talons into his dim witted head. I see a fool.
I agree... a definite fool. The PR hacks are working overtime to try and undermine and discredit the OWS movement.
Yup, can't see through the blood in his own eye. Probably believes that 911 was done by Osama, the wars are justified, and FOX delivers real news.
I say he needs to go out there and talk to those people first before spewing bleh. And maybe read the Declaration re OWS.
He might benefit from reading Donna Beegle and friends about poverty. He would benefit from reading more Hedges, listening to Amy and a round of Zinn.
Blind to reality. A fool, maybe, but then we've all been fooled for long enough by the "politicians" and "wealthy". He probably thinks because he's a conservative that he has a right to ignore his Christian beliefs also...as in what Jesus said about the poor,for starters. I think he also forgot the part about the moneychangers...
Oh ya, and unless he pays no taxes on his own millions...he IS ONE OF US!!! sorry pal
Thank you for displaying your high degree of contemporary ignorance, lack of education, and willingness to be led off a cliff, while providing some unfortunate humor as it's really not polite to laugh at the dunce as he sits on a stool in a corner wearing his conical hat. Your best line was your agreeing that the system being protested against is indeed corrupt while not even realizing your agreement--Too Funny!! And that's been a similar aspect of every troll sent here since OWS became The Thing, like PeterP's line that moral behavior is UnAmerican while immoral behavior is All American. Every Troll is pissing into the wind, which is both humorous and pathetic simultaineously.
You might want to read something other than Ayn Rand. You might want to truly look at reality.... unemployment, starvation, the "value" added by speculators, the reality of the so called free market, who fights our wars, who profits by our wars. You might also want to check out what most wisdom literature says about taking care of the least amongst us....the least referring
to those without enough food and shelter and lacking health care.
You might want to ask yourself what it is that that you conservatives are doing for the environment? Could it be that the worship of Mammon is your true core value?
Private property is a social construct. Modern capitalism is far removed from any morality. Why not lecture the Wall Street titans on "thou shalt not steal?"
Their thefts are monumental and are destroying the world, but you would like to focus on the tiny faults that you find at OWS. Therein lies your hypocrisy.
Chris Hedges and Ketchup. An improbable and beautiful love story. It is the kind of magic that occurs at Occupy Wall Street.