Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Struggling New York School Workers Get Knocked Hard in Budget War
When kids across New York City shuffle into their classrooms next week, they'll discover that a few members of their school community won't be attending, and their absence will be sorely felt.
Fresh casualties of the city's budget wars, more than 700 city school aides and other support personnel have been expelled. As of October 7, many schools will have to adjust to fewer hall monitors, parent coordinators, and other assistants who help administrators and teachers cope with stuffed classrooms, dwindling supply cabinets, and endless standardized tests.
At an Occupy Wall Street solidarity rally on Wednesday, Lillian Roberts, executive director of the prominent municipal union District Council 37, called the school workers' plight a textbook example of New York's economic injustices, from an anti-worker tax structure to the unabashed greed of the city's financial sector:
Just this week, more than 700 low-paid DC 37 members, mainly workers of color at the NYC Dept. of Education, will lose their jobs while wealthy private contractors will continue receiving millions of dollars in payments from New York City and the [Department of Education (DOE)]. The ‘Occupy Wall Street’ protestors have said enough is enough, stop the destructive corporate greed. We couldn’t agree more.
The New York Times profiles one of the many workers of color who may go from the school grounds to the unemployment line:
When Marileysi Garcia received a letter from the Department of Education on Sept. 20 that said her job as a parent coordinator would be eliminated, the first people she picked up the phone to call were the families of Bronx Leadership Academy High School.
“They identify with me because I’m Hispanic myself and come from a low-income background,” she said, referring to the parents that she works with, many of whom she said are also minority residents. “They knew that I was not just there to collect a check, but to really help them answer their questions.”
According to a Times analysis, the cuts will fall on about 350 schools, many in the city's most troubled neighborhoods, where students tend to lag academically and struggle with poverty and other educational obstacles. They include P.S. 153 in Harlem, where 85 percent of students are poor enough to qualify for free school lunch. The math is tragically simple:
At Intermediate School 195, also in Harlem, where 53 percent of students performed well below average in last year’s state standardized tests, six school aides would be let go. … Of the 44 low-performing middle and high schools receiving federal money, 19 would experience cuts of one to four workers, the list of layoffs shows.
With positions that are often part time and typically pay far less than teaching jobs, school aides and other support workers have long been easy targets in budget battles. In 2009, 500 of them lost jobs due to layoffs. Then last year, they may have barely escaped more cuts due mainly to Washington's emergency bailout of state education budgets. Now federal support is fast evaporating, which leaves districts to compensate by making the cutbacks they had been putting off.
It's not just that struggling schools will lose many critical support positions; the layoffs could also strike a blow to hundreds of low-income families supported by these jobs. On the one hand, this reflects a trend of disinvestment and segregation throughout the school system. Yet, advocates say the cuts were largely unnecessary—just a byproduct of Mayor Michael Bloomberg's drive to teach labor a lesson. Union leaders charge that the city is simultaneously posting employment ads advertising "vacancies for the same jobs performed by these unionized public employees." So why get rid of jobs and advertise vacancies at the same time?
The back story is the perennial gridlock surrounding the Department of Education contract talks. While the teachers' union was spared after taking a series of concessions, the school aides' union DC37 pushed back hard against a proposal to raid union healthcare funds. And the union fears the Mayor may now be seeking payback by gutting jobs.
As DC37 seeks a City Council hearing on whether Bloomberg's layoffs could somehow be stopped, Associate Director Henry Garrido told In These Times, “He's not targeting any other union. To score some political points he's putting kids in jeopardy.”
To Garrido, a Dominican-born son of an activist with the garment workers' union UNITE, the cuts follow the contours of inequality in New York City. Many of these workers have struggled to find a foothold in the public workforce after living on public assistance. With the job cuts, he said, “You're sending them back to the same place. They don't have a lot to give.”
Neither do the schools. Many schools may have to rely on teachers to do the logistical jobs aides once did, heaping more work on top of burden of overcrowding. According to a survey United Federation of Teachers, which has supported DC37's fight against the layoffs, “about 256,000 students, roughly a quarter of total enrollment, spend at least part of the school day in an overcrowded class,” reports the Times.
Noah Asher Golden, an educator who helps teachers develop literacy-coaching programs, recently got the abrupt news that he would lose the assistance of two classroom aides. That means the loss of day-to-day support with tasks like computer maintenance and taking attendance. He told ITT that while these jobs may be seen as falling outside the core of instruction and test preparation, “The things that you don't see... the invisible work of a school, is done by teachers aides.” He added, “It's disgusting and morally abhorrent that the Mayor is playing power politics with some of the most vulnerable workers in the DOE.”
Even if the layoffs can't be avoided, the "invisible" workers are making their presence known on the streets of the financial district. DC 37 was just one of many unions who've joined the Occupied Wall Street protests to show that their labor must not be taken for granted. Because for the kids trying to get the most out of their neglected schools, their absence is inexcusable.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



13 Comments so far
Show AllThank you Michelle. These low paid community workers support their own families and the daily work of teachers. Without the support of aides, teachers will have to interrupt their lessons more frequently to deal with minor issues that do not require a masters degree. This is another example of how the most vulnerable are paying for Wall Street's fraudulent derivatives and other excesses, excesses that left traders, bankers and speculators with huge salaries and bonuses, and the rest of us to pay very close to the bone.
The solutions - tax stock trades and tax the wealthy, get rid of corporate tax loopholes, send a few fraudsters to jail - are not even considered.
I wonder how many in administration were laid off? How many administrators lost their transportation? How many seminars, meetings and retreats were canceled?
How many at City Hall were laid off?
As a former civil servant who has been through a number of these layoff crises, I believe it is very rare that middle and upper level management people get laid off. Administrative people who take it will be clerks, secretaries, administrative assistants -- you know, the people who do the actual work (and the people who, were they ever to get organized and act in concert could really jam up the bureaucracies). Senior management, even in budget crisis situations, earn six figure salaries, get their raises and sometimes bonuses, and decide that the budget requires sacrifice -- just not theirs.
I wonder how many low level people at Bloomberg's eponymous company get fired when business drops a bit. If you fire the girl (usually a girl) who brings you coffee in the morning, you might have to go get it yourself. Or you might have to answer your own telephone.
But a teacher doesn't need any help. After all, they think, teachers are just baby sitters, aren't they?
"and decide that the budget requires sacrifice -- just not theirs."
Thats what must be changed!
In many cases yes--not this one.
School Aide is a job that does..., well, let's just say that the least useful administrator is more valuable....here's a School Aide job description (not the NYC one but similar)
http://www.woodbridge.k12.nj.us/agendas/mar1705_agenda/schoolaidejd.htm
you decide if the NYC schools need 82,000 school aides to go with 80,000 teachers or if maybe 81,500 are enough.
They should just close down all the public schools and turn them into government training centers. Those who can't afford to send their brats to religious indoctrination private schools, can send them back to these centers where they can be trained to use weapons and kill since the tender age of 4. A movie by Kurt Russell called "Soldier" comes to mind here. Our illustrious Nobel Peace Prize Laureate president would not object to it since he's thrown his support behind countries that engage in the practice of child soldiers. By the time they're 15, they can be sent to war for the empire. After all, what can be more noble that killing brown people for their oil? See, problem solved!
"The back story is the perennial gridlock surrounding the Department of Education contract talks. While the teachers' union was spared after taking a series of concessions..."
So the teachers suffer a series of concessions--but "their" union, according to Chen, was "spared."
As if it's a good thing that a union, that doesn't even represent workers, is spared!
Spared for what? The collection of more union dues?
I don't think you understand what she said. The relevant statement is: "While the teachers' union was spared after taking a series of concessions, the school aides' union DC37 pushed back hard against a proposal to raid union healthcare funds. And the union fears the Mayor may now be seeking payback by gutting jobs."
The word "taking" in the first sentence probably should be "making." The point is that the teachers (and their union) were not hit hard after making those concessions. The unions representing the teachers' aides did not make concessions, so the mayor, apparently, decided to lean on them.
The unions do indeed represent their members. The only people who don't think so have been drinking the Kool Aid passed out by the right wing.
"The point is that the teachers (and their union) were not hit hard after making those concessions."
You're combining union officials with union members as if they both have the same interests.
They don't.
And the proof that they don't is in the pudding: union officials were "spared" when it came to their interests and union members took the hit with "concessions."
That's what the teachers' union did to their members in Wisconsin.
With a fake-left like this, who needs a right wing?
School Aides don't work in classrooms, but perform duties in the lunch room, schoolyard, locker room, bathroom and also do clerical work in a school's main office.
It's not good when anybody gets laid off, but the jobs are not central to the mission of the public school system and there are 82,000 people employed in that capacity.
The laying off of approx. 560 amounts to less than 1% and as union employees would be recalled to employment as jobs open up due to resignation or retirement among the more than 81,000 other job slots.
less than six months till everybody has an opportunity to return?
Some School Aides do Work directly w teachers assisting in the classroom. School aids monitor hallways, locker-rooms, bathrooms, schoolyards - for safety & security reasons so the teacher can be more focused on say- Teaching!
Quote from the article: 'Advocates say the cuts were largely unnecessary—just a byproduct of Mayor Michael Bloomberg's drive to teach labor a lesson. Union leaders charge that the city is simultaneously posting employment ads advertising "vacancies for the same jobs performed by these unionized public employees." So why get rid of jobs and advertise vacancies at the same time?... - The school aides' union DC37 pushed back hard against a proposal to raid union healthcare funds. And the union fears the Mayor may now be seeking payback by gutting jobs....' <
Your Quote: >'The laying off of approx. 560 amounts to less than 1%'< -
Thus this does indicate this ain't really about the budget because this amounts to just a drip in the whole deficit bucket! Thus this seems more like political pay-back by that Billionaire Bloomberg, who bought NYC's mayor's seat but could have been beaten in the last election by Democratic & Working Families Party candidate Bill Thompson [who was massively out spent by Bloomberg yet came in very close] if Obama & the Dims [PS: Thompson is also a Black Democrat] had supported him - [the way Obama supported Rahmbo over Black Dem candidate Mosley-Braun in Chicago selection for Mayor this yr]!
With national unemployment at +9% & double that for Black & Brown folk- it makes pretzel-logic sense to lay-off more Black & Brown workers - unless Billionaire Bloomberg & his ilk really don't give a damn about working class & working poor folks especially if they are Black & Brown!
Teachers' aides have already been laid off several times over the last years.