EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
Popular content
Today's Top News
How #OccupyWallStreet Is Evolving and Gaining Power
#OccupyWallStreet is evolving. Now in its third week, the protest movement not only continues to grow—it is maturing and becoming stronger in impressive ways.
What started as a few hundred independent activists gathering for a protest on Wall Street, and a few dozen having the resolve to extend their demonstration by camping out in Manhattan’s financial district, has become something much bigger. It has become the embodiment of longstanding progressive hopes that Americans who have been hit hard by the economic crisis—those left jobless, in debt, underemployed, foreclosed, or insecure—would finally get mad enough to publicly vent their outrage at the oligarchs who have for too long perverted our democratic politics and created gross inequality in our country.
The movement is rapidly spreading to cities around the country—to Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, St. Louis, Philadelphia, San Francisco, and Washington, DC., among many others. And it has progressed in some very promising respects. Here are three:
1. The Demand Problem Has Been Solved
Throughout the first couple weeks of the action, the question of whether #OccupyWallStreet had clear enough demands was constantly raised, both by progressive commentators and in the mainstream media coverage the mobilization was receiving. This issue has ceased to be a serious problem because, as the protests have grown, their central focus has become significantly more defined.
During the first week, there was a real problem: When you had just a few dozen people at occupied Liberty Plaza, individual idiosyncrasies stood out. If several of the protesters were Ron Paul libertarians or were obsessed with eliminating the Federal Reserve, another few were 9/11 conspiracy theorists, and several others, when asked by reporters, responded by saying, “We don’t believe in demands,” you ended up with a bona fide messaging crisis.
But that is no longer the situation. The mobilization has now drawn thousands of people who have rallied behind the call of “We Are the 99 Percent.” MoveOn.org summed it up this way: “What do the protesters want? A solution to the jobs crisis, corporate money out of politics, fairer tax rates, and policies that work for 99% of Americans instead of the 1% at the top.”
But you don’t have to take one organization’s word for it. Go to the “We Are the 99 Percent” Tumblr. Read the incredibly moving personal testimonials presented there. Then tell me this protest does not have a message.
For observers who want more specific grievances or detailed policy proposals, declarations now abound, ranging from bold and inclusive statements issued by Wall Street protesters themselves via their general assembly to more modest reform manifestos offered, with only a wee bit of condescension, by figures such as New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof.
Critics who remain preoccupied with the demand issue are missing the point. As Betsy Reed has smartly noted in the Nation, well-formulated lists of proposals do not guarantee that your actions will be taken seriously. (Anyone remember “The May 12 Coalition” or “One Nation Working Together”? Not too many people do, despite strong organization and tight messaging.) Conversely, actions such as #OccupyWallStreet that effectively capture the public imagination and inspire participation despite vague demands can contain great promise—and should be celebrated for the potential they offer.
Ultimately, the movement’s outcry against corporate power is no more diffuse than the Tea Party’s denunciation of “big government.” Protesters do not need to hash out exactly what percentage the capital gains tax rate should be, or precisely how many millions of dollars in student debt should be forgiven, in order for them to have an impact. Like the Tea Party, a broad social movement uprising can do much to alter the climate of public opinion, something that can benefit many different progressive campaigns in the medium to long term. Indeed, many who are running more targeted campaigns (with more narrow and winnable goals) are productively linking up with the mobilization. Which is a second promising development:
2. The Occupation Has Drawn Together an Amazing Coalition
When it started, #OccupyWallStreet was made up of students and independent activists who responded to a call to action that was initially put out by Adbusters but that enjoyed very limited institutional backing. The major organized constituencies of the left—unions, community groups, environmentalists, faith based organizations, and the like—were not part of the mobilization. This was a problem, suggesting that the protests might not have significant reach and would have limited resources at their disposal.
Yet as the actions have gained momentum, the institutional groups have come. Nationally, all sorts have flocked to support #OccupyWallStreet, including but not limited to MoveOn.org and other major organizations associated with the American Dream Movement. In New York City, major unions have declared their support for #OccupyWallStreet, and a veritable who’s who of labor and community organizations are marching to the financial district to show their solidarity.
In just one amazing display of unity among many, the city’s Transit Workers Union (TWU) issued a blistering condemnation of the NYPD this past weekend after police, in the process of arresting some 700 marchers on the Brooklyn Bridge, commandeered three public buses and forced TWU members to transport their captives. “TWU Local 100 supports the protesters on Wall Street and takes great offense that the mayor and NYPD have ordered operators to transport citizens who were exercising their constitutional right to protest—and shouldn’t have been arrested in the first place,” the union president said.
3. The Movement Is Becoming an Umbrella for Economic Justice Causes Nationwide
As the movement spreads nationwide, #OccupyWallStreet is becoming a unifying umbrella under which people outraged about corporate greed can get involved in supporting any number of ongoing efforts to create living-wage jobs, end foreclosures and predatory lending practices, hold banks accountable, get corporate money out of politics, and otherwise promote economic justice and genuine democracy. Much as the Tea Party has served as an overarching brand for conservative discontent, #OccupyWallStreet is giving people the opportunity to identify with a national struggle while advancing causes relevant to their local communities.
In Boston, community groups doing anti-foreclosure actions at Bank of America were able to merge their efforts with #OccupyBoston demands. Likewise, #OccupyLA joined with the United Teachers of Los Angeles in a bank protest during one of its first days in existence. Organizers who have been working on anti-corporate campaigns for months or years now are starting to benefit from the new energy—and new media attention—afforded by a movement that is now seen as a national phenomenon. #OccupyWallStreet, in turn, benefits whenever greater numbers of local drives identify with their overarching effort, when their coalition is broadened, and their credibility as a national force is reinforced by the local buy-in.
The potential for expanding this type of solidarity is great, and it is likely that more groups will be linking up their campaigns in the days and weeks to come. Fortunately, #OccupyWallStreet, which has already made some remarkable strides, is evolving still.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



64 Comments so far
Show AllThe only citizen who has any protection from the Constitution is that little boy who was born by the Supreme Court. That corporate citizen will replace the we of we the people. This Supreme Court parasite will become the 'good German' of globalization.
Hoa binh and good luck.
Ongoing in the rest of the world... similar but different and mutually supportive - citizens in Brazil fighting for the Amazon and to end the Belo Monte hydroelectric on the Xingu.
I'd love to see the Occupy projects have internet representation - just folks carrying Ipads or something - looking for and showing people all the different places people are taking to the streets, crossing the old false division lines and REALLY BECOMING AWARE OF EACH OTHER.
For starters; heres from Brazil - Viva a gente!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxV9ao8t5bI&NR=1
Indigenous peoples struggling to maintain the forests against corporate oil/mining/logging are uniting to demand recognition of their rights to maintain nature. the case of TIPNIS - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8uonTmYfkk&feature=related
Plea to the Dali Lama to pray for the Xingu peoples - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UovTOyijJDE&feature=related
____________________________________
I'm happy with the movement thus far. They've made progress. And just remember, BIG changes are not gong to happen overnight. It will take years to build a sufficiently populated and strong enough movement to win meaningful change. After all, we have HUGE changes that must be made, and the enemy has enormous power and influence.
___________________________________
That said, more "specific" demands will have to be made at some point, even though there's no real hurry for that right now. What's more important is "building" the movement around a set of core principles, recruiting new members, and devising a leadership process and structure.
___________________________________
The "specific" demands at first should be relevant, while being careful about "overreaching". The first public, "specific" demand must be achievable, and worth achieving. Strategy and tactics should be debated in great detail among the leadership, and then shared with the membership for input and commitment. Success literally depends on smart strategy and tactics, as well the ability of the movement to build solidarity.
One*Demand My*1040 + Control the funding & YOU + The*People Control Development & Corporations MUST LOBBY YOU + The*People One*Demand My*1040 Individual Directed Capitalization + iDC 65% of Your tax contribution directed & spent in the areas of public funding of YOUR CHOICE + Power+2+The*Peaceful + My*1040 + United+WE+Succeed - DIVIDED-WE-FAIL
A Democratic Lever of power for the 99%
Starting a new party for the 99%!!??? If the 99% do not understand the lever of power by which the 1% control the 99% the 1% will run circles around us.
So, where is the hole in our democracy whereby a minority (1%) get to rule the majority AND how we can fix it now already in the next election without having to wait for a change in the law?
Our single-mark ballot system -- often called a first-past-the-post system -- is very vulnerable to vote-splitting. Vote-splits divide the voice of a majority and are easily orchestrated to produce victorious candidates. Consider a clear majority of five out of nine voters dividing their ballots in a three-candidate election between two similar candidates. Candidate A gets 2 votes and B gets 3, while C, not approved by the majority, receives 4 votes and is declared elected.
Electorates have the right and the power to be pro-active in the democratic process, seizing the initiative from the political class and reducing the risk of vote-splitting inherent in FPTP/single mark voting systems, currently run and administrated to the direct advantage of the ruling class. Ideally, we should have no minority supported elected representatives in our respective governments. Specific to Canada's 2008 election resulted in 64% of the electoral districts (198 out of 308) returning an MP with minority support, where the majority went home without their candidate elected. Seven MPs were elected with less than one in five citizens voting for them!
A pre-emptive preferential vote123 ballot, conducted by the electorate itself prior to election day, would show who are the candidates A, B, C... and then permit effective tactical voting in every district on voting day, eliminating the risk of minority supported candidates being returned.
I have started to do such a project. An outline of the secret paper ballot straw-vote poll methodology is available at: http://www.eduardhiebert.com/ereform/v123p.htm Note we in Canada* (as identified in a 2008 comment http://www.commondreams.org/view/2008/11/08-2) we still prefer a paper secret ballot poll over online voting.
For an online method in its infancy of development and currently corrupted thanks to some hackers, where some steady alternative visible steady hands would be appreciated, please see www.vote123.ca
These grass-roots initiated organisational first steps would then open the door to compelling further legitimate democratic reform beneficial to the many.
#ComeTogether to #OccupyShakedownStreet
http://tumblr.com/Z-N5nwAReWdh