EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
- 'We Are Movement, Not a Moment': North Carolina Peaceful Uprising Continues
- President Obama Uses a Sledgehammer Against Dissent
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- Is Enbridge Building a Secret Keystone Pipeline?
- President Obama Uses a Sledgehammer Against Dissent
- Victory: Connecticut Becomes First State to Require GMO Labeling
Popular content
Today's Top News
Occupy Wall Street Ends Capitalism's Alibi
This protest pinpoints how dysfunctional our economic system is: we must refashion it for human needs, not corporate aims
Occupy Wall Street has already weathered the usual early storms. The kept media ignored the protest, but that failed to end it. The partisans of inequality mocked it, but that failed to end it. The police servants of the status quo over-reacted and that failed to end it – indeed, it fueled the fire. And millions looking on said, "Wow!" And now, ever more people are organizing local, parallel demonstrations – from Boston to San Francisco and many places between.
Let me urge the occupiers to ignore the usual carping that besets powerful social movements in their earliest phases. Yes, you could be better organized, your demands more focused, your priorities clearer. All true, but in this moment, mostly irrelevant. Here is the key: if we want a mass and deep-rooted social movement of the left to re-emerge and transform the United States, we must welcome the many different streams, needs, desires, goals, energies and enthusiasms that inspire and sustain social movements. Now is the time to invite, welcome and gather them, in all their profusion and confusion.
It is long overdue in the US for us to have a genuine conversation and struggle over our current economic system. Capitalism has gotten a free pass for far too long. (photo: pfarnac1)
The next step – and we are not there yet – will be to fashion the program and the organization to realize it. It's fine to talk about that now, to propose, debate and argue. But it is foolish and self-defeating to compromise achieving inclusive growth – now within our reach – for the sake of program and organization. The history of the US left is littered with such programs and organizations without a mass movement behind them or at their core.
So permit me, in the spirit of honoring and contributing something to this historic movement, to propose yet another dimension, another item to add to your agenda for social change. To achieve the goals of this renewed movement, we must finally change the organization of production that sustains and reproduces inequality and injustice. We need to replace the failed structure of our corporate enterprises that now deliver profits to so few, pollute the environment we all depend on, and corrupt our political system.
We need to end stock markets and boards of directors. The capacity to produce the goods and services we need should belong to everyone – just like the air, water, healthcare, education and security on which we likewise depend. We need to bring democracy to our enterprises. The workers within and the communities around enterprises can and should collectively shape how work is organized, what gets produced, and how we make use of the fruits of our collective efforts.
If we believe democracy is the best way to govern our residential communities, then it likewise deserves to govern our workplaces. Democracy at work is a goal that can help build this movement.
We all know that moving in this direction will elicit the screams of "socialism" from the usual predictable corners. The tired rhetoric lives on long after the cold war that orchestrated it fades out of memory. The audience for that rhetoric is fast fading, too. It is long overdue in the US for us to have a genuine conversation and struggle over our current economic system. Capitalism has gotten a free pass for far too long.
We take pride in questioning, challenging, criticizing and debating our health, education, military, transportation and other basic social institutions. We argue whether their current structures and functioning serve our needs. We work our way to changing them so they perform better. And so it should be.
Yet, for decades now, we have failed to similarly question, challenge, criticize and debate our economic system: capitalism. Because a taboo protected capitalism, cheerleading and celebrating it became obligatory. Criticism and questions got banished as heresy, disloyalty or worse. Behind the protective taboo, capitalism degenerated into the ineffective, unequal, crisis-ridden social disaster we all now bear.
Capitalism is the problem – and the joblessness, homelessness, insecurity, and austerity it now imposes everywhere are the costs we bear. We have the people, the skills and the tools to produce the goods and services needed for a just society to prosper. We just need to reorganize our producing units differently, to go beyond a capitalist economic system that no longer serves our needs.
Humanity learned to do without kings and emperors and slave masters. We found our way to a democratic alternative, however partial and unfinished the democratic project remains. We can now take the next step to realize that democratic project. We can bring democracy to our enterprises – by transforming them into cooperatives owned, operated and governed by democratic assemblies composed of all who work in them and all the residents of the communities who are interdependent with them.
Let me conclude by offering a slogan: "The US can do better than corporate capitalism." Let that be an idea and a debate that this renewed movement can engage. Doing so would give an immense gift to the US and the world. It would break through the taboo, finally subjecting capitalism to the critiques and debates it has evaded for far too long – and at far too great a cost to all of us.
• Richard Wolff is participating in a day-long teach-in at the Occupy Wall Street protest in Zuccotti Park, New York on Tuesday 4 October. This article is based on remarks he will be addressing there at 6pm local time
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


165 Comments so far
Show AllYou sound pretty sure of that. Do you have any evidence?
Is there any aspect of US society that is NOT evidence?
Most aspects of so-called civilization are evidence that SOMETHING is wrong with it. But correlation does not equal causation. You offer no evidence to show that capitalism causes fear, greed and self-centeredness (or any other problems) rather than the other way around, a third thing causing both, it is a two-way street, or that their correlation is a coincidence. I get that many people here believe capitalism is the root of our problems, but there has been nothing offered here but circular arguments and assumed causality (AKA circular arguments).
I believe our psychological problems are the cause of those and other things and those collectively have resulted in our constructing various dysfunctional cultural, social, political, economic and other belief systems, one of which is capitalism. Treating the symptom/s will not cure the disease, therefore, and while that treatment would be a relatively good thing (this and other symptoms are really pretty bad and cause other symptoms which are also bad) it will not solve our problem. It MAY just cause us to spend so much time and energy in opposition to the wrong thing that we don’t realize our mistake until the ecological time bomb ticks down to zero. Oops.
If individual and systemic psychology is our problem we may find that opposing things—at least the way most people do it—in fact only digs us deeper into the stinking pile of problems we have to solve to stop the bomb.
Now before you assume you know what I mean by that and that I am hopelessly naive and new age, let me refer you not to 'The Secret' but to systems science, especially as it impacts on group and family therapy. Of course we have to stop the effects we see now—the burning of coal and oil, nuclear, deforestation, agriculture as war, medicine as war, etc. But in doing so we have to recognize that we and “they” are connected, even to the point of recognizing we are an integral part of the problem. This means not just that we also use coal and oil but that we are part of the psychological problem. We have to recognize that the problem does not reside in them and the solution in us but that we hold their shadow and they hold ours. Only by making conscious our own shadow can we deal with the problem we all cause in different ways.
For example, existence is both separate and one; we are all both separate and one. The fundamental paradox of that is resolved by each of us differently; conservativism errs by mainly or only seeing the separation; liberalism can err by only seeing the connection and denying the separation, (although in our society and maybe in civilization itself the error is way to the conservative side.) We do not see the connectedness (aka sacredness) in the world of what we call ‘things’. Even religion and most conceptions of the sacred are simply complex forms of denial that separate more. But we all have both. We carry conservatives’ shadow and they carry ours. Fighting them only divides the shadow differently. (Look up the evolution of political struggle, issues and parties in the US, for example, in Wikipedia or some other short summary. You’ll see that groups, issues, and divides just shift and realign over different symbols (slavery, rural vs urban populism, abortion, conquest, etc.) without resolving the underlying paradox.
That is the 2 minute version of a maybe 2-year program in Jungian/systems/J4zonian psychology which itself is only understood or believed when backed up by a lifetime of observation and preparation so it will probably not be very credible to most. Our only hope, I think, is to use efficiency, wind, solar, permaculture, reforestation, relocalization, biomimicry, and above all the reconstitution of Nature and our relationship to “it” etc. to buy us enough time for the majority of people to recognize the truth in some system that reminds us we are sacred, we are one.
One more bit to say on the matter:
All systems that continue to exist, including capitalism, must have evolutionary advantages or they wouldn’t continue, that is, they are in some way self-reinforcing or kept alive by something else. This doesn’t mean they’re indefinitely sustainable; only that we haven’t quite gotten to their self-destruction yet. One of capitalism’s evolutionary mechanisms is internally evolutionary as well; it and the culture that surrounds it, perpetuates within itself fear, greed and dissastisfaction (among other things) and thus survives as a system. If it didn’t do that it would be less likely to have survived. That process makes it appear as though it is the cause of those traits rather the other way around, but we can see that that isn’t necessarily the case. Yes, it does cause, even increase those things, but only after existing already. It in turn is caused by those same things, which therefore must have been caused by something else originally.Those traits and capitalism perpetuate each other, but there must be a prior cause to one or both.
If not psychological problems (caused in turn by other stuff too long to go into here except to suggest Nature and Madness by Paul Shepard and Saharasia by James DeMeo, among other works) what do think cause it?
OK.
Capitalism is structured on self-interest, personal gain, and, private ownership.
That might have been acceptable many years ago with a world population of, say, one (1) billion, when resources were plentiful, and, there was room for human energy, human motive, and -- yes -- human greed, to expand. Self-interest is certainly a "motivator". Ants just love sugar.
BUT, TODAY'S WORLD -- OVER TIME -- HAS EXPERIENCED SECULAR CHANGE THAT IS NOT BEING ADDRESSED.
We have seven (7) billion humans on Earth, unregulated, brutal capitalist expansion has polluted Earth, and, food and water are next to luxuries. Am I -- or are you -- "unpatriotic" to suggest, OR, even demand that “self-interest” has become obsolete, and, “group interest” is not only desired but, moreover, required?
With fossil fuels sources in outright decline (Note 1 - German Military Report), if we do not radically adjust of present system of governmental management, we’re all headed downhill to chaos.
---------
Note 1
Germany is moving fast into the Alternative Energy - Solar and Wind generation are taking the considerate proportion in the country's electricity mix. German Military report about Peak Oil was making its rounds from the last year and now we can see more and more news from the technological heart of Europe about its preparation to the Energy Transition and Electrification of its transportation system.
http://www.permaculture.org.au/files/Peak%20Oil_Study%20EN.pdf
One*Demand My*1040 + Control the funding & YOU + The*People Control Development & Corporations MUST LOBBY YOU + The*People One*Demand My*1040 Individual Directed Capitalization + iDC 65% of Your tax contribution directed & spent in the areas of public funding of YOUR CHOICE + Power+2+The*Peaceful + My*1040 + United+WE+Succeed - DIVIDED-WE-FAIL
One*Demand My*1040 + Control the funding & YOU + The*People Control Development & Corporations MUST LOBBY YOU + The*People One*Demand My*1040 Individual Directed Capitalization + iDC 65% of Your tax contribution directed & spent in the areas of public funding of YOUR CHOICE + Power+2+The*Peaceful + My*1040 + United+WE+Succeed - DIVIDED-WE-FAIL
An Alternative to Capitalism (if the people knew about it, they would demand it)
Several decades ago, Margaret Thatcher claimed: "There is no alternative". She was referring to capitalism. Today, this negative attitude still persists.
I would like to offer an alternative to capitalism for the American people to consider. Please click on the following link. It will take you to an essay titled: "Home of the Brave?" which was published by the Athenaeum Library of Philosophy:
http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm
John Steinsvold
Perhaps in time the so-called dark ages will be thought of as including our own.
--Georg C. Lichtenberg