Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Protest Wave: Why the Political Class Can’t Understand Our Demands
The protests that began in Wisconsin this year, and which now also fill the streets of Manhattan, Boston, Chicago, and this week, Washington D.C., have gotten the attention of the American political class. And how could they not? 2011 is becoming a remake of the 1999 Battle of Seattle, except this time the protests are ongoing, national and global, and the target is not just the World Trade Organization, but the entire edifice of corporate capitalism.
So the political class, rather than ignore this wave of protests, pulls a card from the past. They know we are angry, they say. They just don’t understand what we want. We speak in too many voices. According to the American Pravda, The New York Times (which tells the professional classes their truth), we are a “hodgepodge” and “confused” movement with “unclear goals” and “nowhere to go.” Why can’t we settle on a couple key demands?
What some can’t accept, they pretend not to understand. And the political class can’t accept that the common demand of the current protest wave is for democratic revolution. We want them gone. We want power.
We haven’t been secretive about our goals. The Wisconsin Wave was launched in February as a “democracy movement.” Occupy Wall Street calls for an “American Revolution.” The October2011.org occupation of Freedom Plaza in D.C. intends to “Create a New World.” Perhaps, as Thomas Paine once penned, “The birthday of a new world is at hand.”
Democracy is a simple idea. It means “the people rule.” The promise of the United States is democracy. The reality is that corporate elites rule. The contradiction between the promise and reality of America has produced a movement to make the promise the new reality.
We believe it our birthright to directly participate in power. Elections were always a poor substitute for participatory democracy. And elections delegate power from the people to a tiny elite easily browbeaten or bought off by major corporations. Most Americans intuitively know this.
And we have an alternative. A new democratic economy is growing amidst the collapse of the old one. The cooperative sector --made up of coops, credit unions, and community supported and community owned enterprises-- now includes over one third of the American people. Having tasted real democracy, after having been force fed the fake formula, millions are demanding more of the real thing.
We also understand that freedom to govern requires freedom from want. The rights to housing, to an education, to health care, to child care, to a livable income, are all democratic rights. People who don’t have these necessities of life are not free to participate in power. The impoverishment of Americans is the impoverishment of America.
Students of social change learn that mass movements are most likely to emerge at times when economic conditions become intolerable. For tens of millions of Americans, those times are now. This is especially true for young people, among them the many veterans of the unending wars.
The present form of government fails to provide for the pursuit of their happiness. They see that the time has come to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new one. The political class cannot accept this, and so fails to understand it. People in the streets, from Wisconsin to Wall Street to Washington D.C. are proving that we understand it perfectly well.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


80 Comments so far
Show AllThe political class is "incentivized" not to understand what's going on because their ongoing job security would be jeopardized if they didn't buy into the Powers That Be's story, views, and positions. Some of them are putting stuff they know to be untrue out there, some of them are true believers, and it's impossible to figure out who is who. It almost doesn't matter since the liars are going along with the destructive program that the believers so fervently believe in.
Most politicians have told so many lies over the years that they are no longer capable of distinguishing between truth and fiction.
the sophism 'go along to get along' - willful ignorance, in other words - that "politics is the art of compromise"- absolutely does not mean that between normative reality and the common good passes the almighty dollar.. The assertion is actually very recent, utterly corrupt and immoral, unsustainable and (dare I say) a deck missing a few cards; not a full bag of marbles; not the brightest bulb; or.... maybe just dumb as a sack of hammers.
Good insight there -
"Some of them are putting stuff they know to be untrue out there, some of them are true believers, and it's impossible to figure out who is who. It almost doesn't matter since the liars are going along with the destructive program that the believers so fervently believe in."
so many things we want!
we don't, however, want to do without the cell phone we're using to text our friends while we drive, or stop to pick up the empty Coca-Cola cup we just threw out the car window...
look out world! I'm a wanter...no, even better...I"m a Demander!
there is a war coming...
this planet was not created to be a supply of parts, and will not survive being used as one...
there is a war coming...
it sounds ominous when this guy calls out "We want power"
you all about ready to rock and roll?
You can tell americans have not participated in democracy for a long time. All they can talk about is what they have read about in books. We all have power, we just need to learn how to use it better. They are also grouchy when they wake up. Coca-cola is really bad for you, do people still drink that stuff.
The question of what to take from the environment, and how, is separate from the struggle against exploitation and inequality, Conflating the two serve the powerful at our expense.
Suggesting that individual bad habits or attitudes on the part of the general public are causing those in power to act as they do is unsupportable.
If the two were not related then one would not have an impact on the other, exploitation does not exist in a vacuum. You either live by a creative or destructive way. It is up to each person to decide where they are in that process.
"Why the Political Class Can’t Understand Our Demands", because they made their money the old-fashioned way, They either stole it or inherited it.
Most of them have done a little bit of both.
... or a lot.
We must replace Free Market Capitalism, with a Democratic Socialist system which understands that no man is an island.Humans have an Oblogation to make sure eveyone has access to the basic requirements to live. Banks Should be Creating wealth to pay for Labor not debt.The World must revoke all Corporate Licenses. We would be better off with Private,and Publicly owned businesses.. No Corporations. .
We don't need to convey demands to the elites. We only need to inspire the people. But the elite media has to carry the message to the people, so it should appear useful, benign, puzzling or distracting to elites. Elites are very much in tune with the plight of the people, but in a very contemptuous/condescending way. They think the people are lazy, wanting handouts. Which message inspires the people while leaving the elites puzzled, or distracted? We need to inspire the people to shift their exchange/association away from the elites and toward their local communities. Probably the first objective should be to help the people break their destructive infatuation with the elite lifestyle, both the material aspect (petro-opiates) and the social aspect (elite personalities). Ridicule of the elite lifestyle seems to be the prescription. And trumpeting the alternative, localism, has to be in the mix. So a prototype message might be: In our neighborhood we leave our doors unlocked, confident that the TeeVee won't find a way in. (you think of a better one, please)
VIVA LA REVOLUTION!!
I can't understand how the people of Wisconsin voted to keep the republicans in the majority after the way they are being treated. Can anyone give me a rational answer why they voted that way?
Electronic voting? Computers cannot count votes, they can only provide programmed results. He who writes the program determines the election. Who owns the voting machines? Republican donors. Electronic voting should have been laughed into oblivion, and the first "questionable" result--like more votes than voters--should have caused an immediate halt on their use. The fact that they are still in use--even though it has repeatedly been proven that they can be hacked--proves that the voting is rigged from the get-go as far as I am concerned.
Internet voting is never to be confused with voting machines. If we can make online purchases safely, bank online, pay our taxes online, and if corporations, the government and everyone else uses the Internet to conduct business with proper safeguards, we the people can make our own laws often and vote on them safely online without the corrupting influence of Big Money bribes to politicians.
http://ni4d.us/
I am very grateful for all your answers. Getting money out of our politics and getting rid of our bought government should be fought for by the 99 percent of us, I hope we can make a difference. This is real, and won't be bought like the tea party was!
Thank you. I just wrote Bernie Sanders and Dennis Kucinich, suggesting that they introduce a bill to ban lobbying. I think ending legal bribery is something we can all support that would make all the difference.
Heh.
Of course, writing your congresscritter is itself lobbying. What you really want is the removal of corporate influence upon Congress, so that the people, whom they are supposed to represent, will actually be represented.
Because of the Citizens United decision, any ban on lobbying would be quickly invalidated.
What we need is a ban on corporate personhood, which means amending the constitution.
Yet, such an amendment is virtually impossible--given Citizens United. Corporations would spend essentially infinite cash to block the amendment at all levels, and they may now legally do so.
In other words, the legal bribery bit appears to be locked in and unassailable--
So people are taking to the streets.
Like the article says, eh?
Well said,
But let us not forget Kelo v. City of New London, The supreme court decision that allows municipal entities to take private land through eminent domain (paying fair market value, that is determined by aforementioned municipality) and sell it to a corporate entity to develop in the name of public use and improvement. I just can't see how a Walmart is an improvement over a family homestead, but I can see how this is a potential union of political greed and corporate greed. The decisions of the Supreme court are definitely skewed to corporate rights over individual human rights
Yes, this makes a lot of sense. The Democrats are not really any better, they are just somewhat better...so we vote for the worse guys anyway?
More likely too many people stay home.
Australia has the right answer to stop Republican corruption of the voter roles. Voting is required by law there. As such, there is then a legal imparitive that all people must have the means to vote. This wipes out underhanded attempts to alienate classes of voters.
It does not stop voter stupidity though, and we see a lot of that from that generation who still believe everything that appears on Television.
Must watch new video;
Zeitgeist Moving Forward:
http://www.zeitgeistmovingforward.com/
One demand:
DIRECT DEMOCRACY!
I just watched it. Very inspiring. The aim of the Zeitgeist Movement is to create a Resource-based Economy that eliminates money and markets using a Planetary Resource Management System.
I'm all for it as long as it is a technologically decentralized, direct democratic system, with no oligarchs, commissars, politicians and theocrats calling the shots
Good point about decentralized. Watching it now, the first hour about the distorting effects on the human psyche of competitive markets seems well thought out IMO.
US regime is like the Egyptian. Nothing will happen unless the street movements produces program and candidates, using same channels tea party has done.
I have no interest in swimming the same polluted channels as the Tea Party.
and NEW is needed there for the tea party will not disinfect the system
This is funny. The Tea Party has nothing to do with grass roots. It was bought and paid for by the Coke brothers (intentional spelling).
Another couple who inherited the means and are a couple very adept theives.
I would submit that we consider advocating a new form of democracy that has yet to be tried, and that would be a social democracy with a 70% socialism and 30% capitalism mix - to both protect the commons, give citizens a meaningful voice, and provide adequate profitable incentive to commercial interests. I say one of the first acts to implement in this new social democracy is to restrict advertizing to channels of media where you go to browse products - not in your face everywhere you turn! Un-bridled commercialism is destroying this planet. And, all natural resources (air protection, water and environmental protection; and energy supplies - coal, oil, etc) really should be under the control of a democratically controlled government with long-term planning. If we elect and support wise leaders we would see a new country and world emerge. We have seen very few in decades - in this country or others.
I'm not sure these exact percentages would be an attainable goal, but the idea has merit. I have long thought there -- I hate to use this word -- should be a some sort of worker owned system where employees when hired are given a certain percentage of the company stock with longevity being rewarded with an increasing percentage and dividends paid out from company earnings. Then they would elect the Boards of Directors and would profitably benefit from increases in productivity. The direct democracy advocated often on this site by ezeflyer and others could easily be incorporated into such a system.
There are plenty of ways such a system could be corrupted especially with the financial scamming expertise that the current owners and operators have accumulated. And there are probably half a zillion other reasons why it wouldn't work. Everyone would probably have to be decorrupted before such a system could be put in place, and that's probably impossible.
there are several really good systems available and as soon as we produce different sets of humans the systems will work.
Yes, but ALL politicians understand one thing quite well: They don't want to share their power with the people.
Consequently they will play dumb about the FACT that the people have figured out that the government does not represent the people any longer.
The politiicans get it. You won't find a more territorial, violent group of cutthroats on this earth than those smiling politiicians. They'll fight to keep the people from legitimate representation because the politicians are part of and work for the 1%.
"The rights to housing, to an education, to health care, to child care, to a livable income, are all democratic rights."
Understand too that we only need to work ten hours per week to maintain the basics, food, clothing, shelter, transport. This is proven by intentional communities. Granted, this does not cover elite-supplied produkts/servicez. So if you find yourself struggling to 'make ends meet' on 40 hrs/week, or for a family, two 40hr/wk jobz, remember that thug-elites or their foot-soldiers have misled you to believe you need the inflated cost of their warez, i.e. the $300k house, the $15k/yr university tuition, the $900/mo health insurance, the $400/mo personal transport, the $200/mo frankenfood. We don't need any of it. Try the abundance of nature for a change. In fact, the sustainability formula leaves over 75% of earth's terrestrial area in wildland, enabling nature to provide far in excess of human needs, even at this state of human over-population. Not to excuse over-population at all. Wildlife needs 75% of the land area for ease of movement.
We can choose to expend/consume only 1/4 of the average energy currently expended/consumed by Merkans, and focus it on our true needs, and we will thrive, and the planet will thrive. But if we choose the status quo, then the mass slavery/plunder and mass extinction will continue relentlessly.
---"Understand too that we only need to work ten hours per week to maintain the basics, food, clothing, shelter, transport. This is proven by intentional communities"---
exactly which international communities have sustained themselves with a population that worked only 10 hours per week?
That's intentional, not international, communities. I won't comment on them, but anthropologists have determined that hunter/gatherer societies only needed to "work" about 30 hours per week to provide for their wellbeing.
The "abundance of nature" - i.e., living like a caveman. Bugs, cold, bad food, shortages, constant danger. We have been rich so long that we have forgotten that poverty (real poverty) sucks. I would like to know where to find this 15K p.a. university education of which you speak, though. Where I come from, that just about pays for a year of high school.
It's not for the likes of you to dictate to the rest of us our "true needs."
"The "abundance of nature" - i.e., living like a caveman. Bugs, cold, bad food, shortages, constant danger."
Why would we go back to that? Ever hear of "appropriate technology"? It says that we can live in harmony with our Mother Nature, the biosphere that gives us life, without destroying it.
The greatest beauty is organic wholeness,
the wholeness of life and things,
the divine beauty of the universe.
Love that, not man apart from that . . .
Robinson Jeffers
Bla, bla, bla.
I heard this same story forty years ago during the "60's" revolution. It was a sham promoted by the opportunistic rich kids then, it is the same thing today.
Kids. Take care of yourselves. Get an education, or job skill, and don't listen to BS from the do "gooders."
Your enemy is ignorance and want. Take care for yourself, only.
You are free. What more do you need?
"Kids. Take care of yourselves. Get an education, or job skill, and don't listen to BS from the do "gooders."
...or "Listen to your oligarchy. They know what's best for you".
"Your enemy is ignorance and want. Take care for yourself, only. "
Your enemy wants you ignorant and wanting. Greed is good.
"You are free. What more do you need?"
You are free to starve, sell drugs or join the military and become a gangster for capitalism.
ezeflyer,
Well said. These corporate tools are starting to sound just like Mubarak in Egypt some time ago. Next thing you know, they'll be telling the protesters to "Just go home to your moms".
They just don't get it. Oh, but they will.
Oh, balony. You are free to read, to study, to adopt prudent and productive habits, to learn a trade or profession, to make something of yourself. But - if you choose to live for pleasure alone, to breed out of wedlock with no prospects, or to indulge yourself in "creativity" (hint- you're not Mozart and you never will be - get a job), then you will end up poor - and you will richly deserve it.
Translated:
"Everything is fine and dandy (for me), so don't try to change things and accept a miserable existence working for some corporation that will enslave you, make you work long hours without overtime pay, move to China were labor is cheaper, then spit you out without any benefits - because that's what the rich believe you deserve."
Mozart died very poor, as do the great majority of artists. Even reading isn't free as somebody had to go through the expense of teaching you how to in the first place. The same goes for studying. Being taught/Becoming educated isn't free. Everything in life has a cost. Somehow you failed to learn that.
Myth of the self-made man
Day in the Life of Joe Middle-Class Republican
By John Gray Cincinnati, Ohio - July - 2004
Joe gets up at 6:00am to prepare his morning coffee. He fills his pot full of good clean drinking water because some liberal fought for minimum water quality standards. He takes his daily medication with his first swallow of coffee. His medications are safe to take because some liberal fought to insure their safety and work as advertised.
All but $10.00 of his medications are paid for by his employers medical plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for paid medical insurance, now Joe gets it too. He prepares his morning breakfast, bacon and eggs this day. Joe’s bacon is safe to eat because some liberal fought for laws to regulate the meat packing industry.
Joe takes his morning shower reaching for his shampoo; His bottle is properly labeled with every ingredient and the amount of its contents because some liberal fought for his right to know what he was putting on his body and how much it contained. Joe dresses, walks outside and takes a deep breath. The air he breathes is clean because some tree hugging liberal fought for laws to stop industries from polluting our air. He walks to the subway station for his government subsidized ride to work; it saves him considerable money in parking and transportation fees. You see, some liberal fought for affordable public transportation, which gives everyone the opportunity to be a contributor.
Joe begins his work day; he has a good job with excellent pay, medicals benefits, retirement, paid holidays and vacation because some liberal union members fought and died for these working standards. Joe’s employer pays these standards because Joe’s employer doesn’t want his employees to call the union. If Joe is hurt on the job or becomes unemployed he’ll get a worker compensation or unemployment check because some liberal didn’t think he should loose his home because of his temporary misfortune.
Its noon time, Joe needs to make a Bank Deposit so he can pay some bills. Joe’s deposit is federally insured by the FSLIC because some liberal wanted to protect Joe’s money from unscrupulous bankers who ruined the banking system before the depression.
Joe has to pay his Fannie Mae underwritten Mortgage and his below market federal student loan because some stupid liberal decided that Joe and the government would be better off if he was educated and earned more money over his life-time.
Joe is home from work, he plans to visit his father this evening at his farm home in the country. He gets in his car for the drive to dads; his car is among the safest in the world because some liberal fought for car safety standards. He arrives at his boyhood home. He was the third generation to live in the house financed by Farmers Home Administration because bankers didn’t want to make rural loans. The house didn’t have electric until some big government liberal stuck his nose where it didn’t belong and demanded rural electrification. (Those rural Republican’s would still be sitting in the dark)
He is happy to see his dad who is now retired. His dad lives on Social Security and his union pension because some liberal made sure he could take care of himself so Joe wouldn’t have to. After his visit with dad he gets back in his car for the ride home.
He turns on a radio talk show, the host’s keeps saying that liberals are bad and conservatives are good. (He doesn’t tell Joe that his beloved Republicans have fought against every protection and benefit Joe enjoys throughout his day) Joe agrees, “We don’t need those big government liberals ruining our lives; after all, I’m a self made man who believes everyone should take care of themselves, just like I have”.
Great post. Thanks O.G.
@ douglashoyt@hot...,
nah, back then there was an actual and extensive movement and there indeed was endless posturing from not quite "rich" kids then, but there was an actual base of support from other groups because there were specific issues...and there were actions proposed that had support from people who knew their elbows from hot rocks and knew how to get things done.
this time around there is no real support and there isn't going to be any when groups of otherworldly and ignorant assholes post something like this list of "demands".
http://occupywallst.org/forum/proposed-list-of-demands-for-occupy-wall-st-moveme/
this is the kind of shit that indeed shows a profound ignorance of the world and relies on magical thinking.
Yeah, these kids have a load to learn, but advising them to give it all up and instead advance selfishness.....sorta just sucks.
there's no shortage of selfishness and we don't need any more of it.
we can't remake the world overnight but we can do a bit better than doing nothing.
Could it be that these are mostly a bunch of frickin' greedy millionaires who couldn't give a rat's ass about anybody except their bank accounts? Here's a new method to get representatives (if we have to keep with this tired system): no elections. Instead, a lottery and everyone over the age of 18 is entered into it. It's a selection not an election. Now, we'll get the real voice of the people.