Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
America's New Radicals Attack a System That Ignores Them
"Enraged young people," The New York Times worries aloud, are kicking off the dust of phony democracy, in which "the job of a citizen was limited to occasional trips to the polling places to vote" while decision-making remains in the claws of a rarified elite of overpaid corporate executives and their corrupt pet politicians.
"From South Asia to the heartland of Europe and now even to Wall Street," the paper continues, "these protesters share something else: wariness, even contempt, toward traditional politicians and the democratic political process they preside over. They are taking to the streets, in part, because they have little faith in the ballot box."
As Crane Brinton pointed out in his seminal book "The Anatomy of Revolution," an important predictor of revolution is downward mobility among strivers, young adults whose education and ambition would traditionally have led to a brighter future. (photo: watchingfrogsboil)
The rage of the young is real. It is justified. It is just beginning to play out.
The political class thinks it can ignore the people it purports to represent. They're right--but not forever. A reckoning is at hand. Forty years of elections without politics will cost them.
Americans' pent-up demand for a forum to express their disgust is so vast that they are embracing slapdash movements like Occupy Wall Street, which reverses the traditional tactic of organizing for a demonstration. People are protesting first, then organizing, then coming up with demands. They have no other choice. With no organized Left in the U.S., disaffected people are being forced to build resistance from the ground up.
Who can blame young adults for rejecting the system? The political issue people care most about--jobs and the economy--prompts no real action from the political elite. Even their lip service is half-assed. Liberals know "green jobs" can't replace 14 million lost jobs; conservatives aren't stupid enough to think tax cuts for the rich will help them pay this month's bills.
The politicians' only real action is counterproductive; austerity and bank bailouts that hurt the economy. Is the government evil or incompetent? Does it matter?
Here in the United States, no one should be surprised that young adults are among the nation's angriest and most alienated citizens. No other group has been as systematically ignored by the mainstream political class as the young. What's shocking is that it took so long for them to take to the streets.
Every other age groups get government benefits. The elderly get a prescription drug plan. Even Republicans who want to slash Medicaid and Medicare take pains to promise seniors that their benefits will be grandfathered in. Kids get taken care of too. They get free public education. ObamaCare's first step was to facilitate coverage for children under 18.
Young adults get debt.
The troubles of young adults get no play in Washington. Pundits don't bother to debate issues that concerns people in their 20s and 30s. Recent college graduates, staggering under soaring student loan debt, are getting crushed by 80 percent unemployment--and no one even pretends to care. Young Americans tell pollsters that their top concerns are divorce, which leaves kids impoverished, and global warming. Like jobs, these issues aren't on anyone's agenda.
This pot has been boiling for decades.
In 1996 I published "Revenge of the Latchkey Kids," a manifesto decrying the political system's neglect and exploitation of Generation X, my age cohort, which followed the Baby Boomers.
We were in our 20s and low 30s at the time.
Un- and underemployment, the insanity of a job market that requires kids to take out mortgage-sized loans to attend college just to be considered for a low-paid entry-level gig in a cube farm, the financial and emotional toll of disintegrating families, and our fear that the natural world was being destroyed left many of my peers feeling resentful and left out--like arriving at a party after the last beer was gone.
Today the oldest Gen Xers are turning 50. Life will always be harder for us than it was for the Boomers. If I had to write "Latchkey Kids" for today's recent college grads, it would be bleaker still. Today's kids--demographers call them Gen Y--have it significantly worse than we did.
Like us, today's young adults get no play from the politicians.
The debts of today's Gen Yers are bigger ($26,000 in average student loans, up from $10,000 in 1985). Their incomes are smaller. Their sense of betrayal, having gone all in for Obama, is deeper.
Young adults turned out big for Obama in 2008, but he didn't deliver for them. They noticed: The One's approval rating has plunged from 75 percent among voters ages 18-29 when he took office in January 2009 to 45 percent in September.
Politicians like Obama ignore young adults, especially those with college degrees, at their--and the system's--peril. Now, however, more is at stake than Obama and the Democrats' 2012 election prospects. The entire economic, social and political order faces collapse; young people may choose revolution rather than accept a life of poverty in a state dedicated only to feeding the bank accounts of the superrich.
As Crane Brinton pointed out in his seminal book "The Anatomy of Revolution," an important predictor of revolution is downward mobility among strivers, young adults whose education and ambition would traditionally have led to a brighter future.
In February Martin Wolf theorized in The Financial Timesthat the Arab Spring rebellions in Egypt and Tunisia owed their success to demographics; those countries have more young people than old ones. On the other hand "middle-aged and elderly rig political and economic life for their benefit in the U.K. [he could also have said the U.S.]: hence the way in which policies on housing or education finance are weighted against the young."
Right here and right now, though, the young and the old are on the same side. Though the young are getting screwed the hardest, almost everyone else is getting screwed too. And with 80 percent unemployment, the young have a lot of free time to rise up.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


59 Comments so far
Show AllThe US ruling class has always been able to safely ignore and/or crush progressive protests by those whom the colluding MSM of the day have sustainedly labelled as 'radicals' -- especially if labelled 'youthful radicals.'.
Progressive gains in the US have typically been made against our society's many unjust/entrenched legal and social norms [whether the fight was against Chattel Slavery,or for Women's Rights, or against Structural Poverty, or for racial Civil Rights and Environmental protections, or against imperialist Wars -- when the so-called radicals who were spearheading demands for humane policy changes in these areas, finally managed to enlist wider support from seemingly non-radical, and up to that point, passive fellow citizens.
These youthful Wall Street protesters now seem to be trying to spread their energy and apparently progressive message across both US spatial and age-defined boundaries --something essential if their protest and vision isn't to meet the same fate as the best of the recently pluto-co-opted Tea Partiers.
I've sent their now-identified organizers some money, wish them well, and will support them further -- but my support for them is only reliable if they continue to fight for a government Of, By, and For the People.
If they or their leaders prove to be nothing but a collection of I Want Mine No Mater What brats, who can not or will not integrate their protest values into a truly radical sum of wholly-progressive change for all Here and Abroad-- young, middle and ol,, then I'll have made a wrong investment, and it will be back-to-the-drawing-board for me, at least, as to Who and What to support anymore Whatsoever...
.
,
.
.
.
Serfs up!
heh heh. That's funny every time.
"they are embracing slapdash movements like Occupy Wall Street, which reverses the traditional tactic of organizing for a demonstration."
That is only Ted Rall's perception of a truly grass-roots movement. Notice that Rall is still clinging to the elites' false narrative of the 'necessity' of class, hierarchy, top-down dominance/submission. Rall is reluctant to wholeheartedly embrace the spirit, the thrust, of the movement. With such reluctance now, imagine the damage he has done in months/years past with his assumptions.
"With no organized Left in the U.S., disaffected people are being forced to build resistance from the ground up."
Yes, Ted, but let's frame it in a way that truly acknowledges the people, and preserves their dignity: By rejecting the fallacy of 'organization', the people are recognizing that individual actions driven from internal imperatives will synergize with the same imperatives/actions of their peers, resulting in leaderless, united, incorruptible organic movements that preserve the power and dignity of all.
The Financial Aristocracy has taken out jobs, homes and life's savings.
We want it all back. They can keep their defunct politicians.
The other systems have already failed, over and over so lets try them again, lol. No sense of history will insure similar results
Systems other than Capitalism have succeeded. Were that not true, the human race would not have survived.
It is wishful thinking to say that challenges to Capitalism have failed, and so therefore all challenges must also always fail.
Am I the only one who remembers S.W.I.N.E.?
Al Capp was the cartoonist who drew the nationally syndicated cartoon strip =Li'l Abner=. Capp got fed up with protest demonstrations against the nuclear arms race, the Vietnam War, oppression of Women, and a dozen other causes. So he populated the cartoon strip Li'l Abner with S.W.I.N.E. - - - which he defined to stand for Students Wildly Indignant about Nearly Everything.
Trylon
Use the system we have, to fix the system we have... and demand one simple law: make it a misdemeanor NOT to vote in federal elections.