Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
What Does the Occupation of Wall Street Have to Do With Agriculture?
Now two weeks in, the occupation of Wall Street originated from a July call to action by Adbusters to draw a line in the sand on the growing corporate control of our democracy and government—and in particular, Wall Street’s influence.
Agriculture markets have been especially hard hit by Wall Street’s political prowess. Wall Street deregulation has not only made the stock market extremely volatile, it has increased prices and price volatility in agricultural markets. The cost of protecting against price volatility are considerable for the future of agriculture not only in the U.S., but around the world.
The occupation of Wall Street protests originated from a July call to action by Adbusters to oppose growing corporate control over democracy and government. (photo: marniejoyce.)
In 2008, we reported on the role a new wave of financial speculators, operating through commodity index funds controlled by Wall Street firms like Goldman Sachs, played in creating extreme volatility in agriculture commodity markets—and ultimately contributing to rising global rates of hunger. Wall Street speculators were able to enter commodity futures markets after a successful and systematic decade-long lobbying effort to dismantle strong market safeguards. According to Wall Street Watch, from 1998–2008, Wall Street invested over $5 billion in lobbying and campaign contributions in support of their deregulatory agenda.
In the last two years, IATP and many others have worked to overcome a huge lobbying surge by Wall Street (President Obama had to actually beg Wall Street to call off the dogs) opposing efforts to effectively regulate commodity futures exchanges within the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Bill. That fight continues as Wall Street is expending enormous amounts of money to influence the rule-making process at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Security Exchange Commission (Goldman Sachs alone spent $1.08 million in lobbying agencies last quarter). And unfortunately, according to Reuters, Wall Street is making headway by watering down proposals for new position limits set by the CFTC, which regulate the amount of futures contracts any one entity can hold at any one time.
Wall Street aside, it’s nearly impossible to find a legislative or regulatory issue related to food and agriculture that hasn’t been deeply shaped (if not outright written) by corporate lobbyists. Adbusters called for a Presidential Commission to end the influence of corporate money in Washington. That would be step in the right direction for those who care about agriculture and our food system. If Washington won’t step up to the plate, the stakes will only get higher.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

10 Comments so far
Show AllI think maybe all of the folks who write these articles about the 'markets' and 'legislation' and 'regulation' should drop the terms "lobbying" & "lobbyists' and just use Bribing and Bribers instead. Then maybe more people would come to understand just how corrupted every part of our financial/government system has become.
The banksters' manipulation of agricultural commodity prices and energy prices continues to fuel the flames of inflation. That is why Obama's super catfood commission is revising the way the government calculates the rate of inflation.
I think it's much worse than that. I think that corruption is so entrenched in the DNA of our current political structures, that no "bribing" in the traditional sense is necessary anymore. We have allowed the crooks to gain so much power, that now they can continue robbing us while not doing anything ostensibly devious. This far behind we have fallen.
Wall Street.
The M.I.C.
'Conventional' (complete misnomer) Agriculture, and MONSATANO.
For Life, for Prosperity, for true Liberty and Justice to ever survive,
These each must fall before the POWER OF THE PEOPLE.
This world, and this nation, all its people (the 99%) must get their priorities right, or we are ALL screwed.
The Wall Street speculation on life sustaining commodities is simply amoral. Monsanto is amoral. Conventional agriculture, due to the strain put on ecosystems, our bodies and the competition it imposes on more natural methods of agriculture, is also amoral.
Privatization is Theft.
Deregulation is Corruption
Corporate Personhood is a weapon against We The People.
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
—John F. Kennedy
SAL-SEC: Well said!
"Adbusters called for a Presidential Commission to end the influence of corporate money in Washington."
I read that just before the occupation began and I was rather dismayed at Kalle Lasn's naivete. Now this author is parroting the same bankrupt goal. Thankfully this movement is now out of Mr. Lasn's control. Anyone who thinks that this Plutocratic obscenity can be solved, or even dealt with, by a presidential commission, is either engaging in disingenuous obfuscation, or is completely ignorant of the scope of the problem. We are embroiled in system collapse; the system is beyond repair; the solution will not come from within the system.
I assume that the term "Presidential Commission" is a replacement term for the putatively politically incorrect "Chinese Fire Drill".
Whether it's a result of sheer myopic ignorance or arrant folly, anyone who seriously calls for a "Presidential", "blue-ribbon", or any comparable high-level government body or institution to investigate or solve crises is delusional at best.
The global economy has become a kind of sick-o parody of a planetary ecosystem where everything that happens affects everything else.
DOWN with the CORPOCRACY!! DOWN WITH THE PLUTOCRATS !!
To Dennis Kucinich, Bernie Sanders and other progressive politicians:
It is time that you introduce a law to ban lobbying. You will have public support for this one.