Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Migrants in Limbo as Libyan Revolution Reaches Endgame
As the Libyan uprising reaches its climax, gun battles flare, bodies pile up in hospitals, and the capital is paralyzed in fear. And somewhere in the revolutionary endgame, outsiders who have no part in either side of the upheaval find their lives hanging in the balance. Masses of migrant workers, part of a stream of cheap labor that poured in from Asia and Africa during Libya's boom years, helped build Gaddafi's oil empire, witnessed its rapid demise and could end up helping rebuild the country from ruins.
Following the rebels' entry into the capital, the International Organization for Migration has been working to ferry out migrants stranded in Tripoli, though it reported being stalled for a few days due to security concerns. The IOM reported Friday it had picked up a group that included “Egyptians, Filipinos, Canadians, Algerians, Moroccans and an Italian.” But many more migrants remain besieged, and the IOM has sent another boat to retrieve more workers, including possibly those living on the outskirts of Tripoli, where many of the workers from sub-Saharan Africa are concentrated.
Since the fighting broke out in March, Voice of America reports, many West Africa migrants have escaped in tatters to northern Niger, some going without food for days. At an aid camp, impoverished refugees still faced insecurity at every turn: virtually no decent job prospects in their home countries, Niger and Chad withered by a food crisis, and desperately needed remittances cut off by poltiical chaos:
Sogni Zacharia, a migrant worker from Burkina Faso and now in Niger, says the situation is not good in Libya. He says there is war and they beat up people. He says they do not pay you when you work. He says they tell you to leave and they will not pay you because you are an African.
The past several months have seen a desperate exodus of hundreds of thousands of foreign workers, out of a huge initial population of about 2.5 million. Back in March, thousands were thronging to Benghazi and to the Libya-Egyptian border to escape the violence. But aid workers observed that a steep drop in the flow of refugees was as troubling as the initial influx, according to the AP:
There has been a marked drop in the number of migrant workers coming across the border, from a peak of 20,000 several days ago to between 1,400 and 1,800, the U.N. said. On Saturday, only 500 had crossed into Tunisia by midday, said a U.N. official at the border.
People fleeing for Tunisia said they had to pass through dozens of checkpoints on the way from Tripoli to the border. All said they had been robbed by Gadhafi's security forces....
Those who crossed into Tunisia in the last two days have reported seeing thousands of fellow migrant workers on the Libyan side, but it was unclear why they were not approaching the border. The U.N. refugee agency said it worries that thousands of people trying to cross over are being held back by Libyan authorities.
At one refugee camp in Tunisia earlier this year, the desperate, cramped conditions showed that Libya's economic hierarchy—fueled by imported workers in construction, domestic help and other sectors—remained somewhat intact even in times of upheaval:
Many of the Bangladeshis and Africans, in particular, remain far down the pecking order of nations that have the resources to evacuate their citizens, and some were too scared to venture out.
U.N. refugee agency spokeswoman Melissa Fleming said Saturday the agency's team in Benghazi reported that most foreigners who sought help had been evacuated. Her agency had set up a camp at Benghazi for some 8,000 foreigners awaiting evacuation, most of them Bangladeshi, Indian and Sudanese migrants.
Many of the Africans who have fled say they are terrified of being mistaken for mercenaries who the opposition says were hired by Gadhafi's regime.
Though Libya has history of exploiting and abusing African migrants, the civil war amplified the racism; there were reports of blacks being targeted by those who suspected they were hired guns for the regime.
So far, the plight of migrants has understandably not been the focus of the world's attention—not when the media sought to glorify the messy, fractious uprising as a narrative extension the Arab Spring, and not when NATO and the corporate interests are busy eyeing the oil profits that await them in the aftermath of the “humanitarian” bombing campaign. And migrants' rights probably haven't been high on the list of priorities for the Transitional National Council as it tries to map out a new political system. But as we're reported before, migrants have always been the hidden lifeblood of Libya's economy, and will be crucial to the rebuilding effort once the conflict ends.
UN official Sybella Wilkes gave NPR an eerily optimistic outlook for the post-Gaddafi economy:
Those that have stayed have really stayed through the bitterest, most difficult period. And of course they probably have the most to lose by leaving because I think they see that there's potentially a lot of opportunity when the conflict's over.
But the old regime offered these migrants “opportunity” as well. In the new Libya, will workers who formed the underclass of a dictatorship finally achieve dignity in the emergent democracy? Will Libya's new leaders construct a more just economy or just lay out a fresh platform for neoliberal exploitation? In the democratic transition, if Libya is to remake itself as a nation, it will have to redefine economic citizenship.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



14 Comments so far
Show AllOn other posts writers are saying how bad America is. And yet on ABC they are talking about what America should do in context with Libya. Give me a break... damned if you do and...
Did not mean to double post.
Here is my waste of time.
Do you know your Jalil from your Jebril?
If you try to find out about the National Transition Council (sometimes called the Transitional National Council) NTC of Libya you can end up looking at three websites. Two begin ntclibya, but then you can choose either the .org or the .com.
The other begins ntclibyaus, then .org.
Choosing the ntclibya with .com is, to me, the most revealing because of its flashy pictures of Jalil, Cameron, and Obama and because it is where you can find Mr. Jebril. He is listed under the executive committee. He is the chairman and he is described as a lover of privatization, as is his vice chairman.
Mr. Mahmoud Jebril is all about business strategies and has been referred to as the Prime Minister, while Mr. Mustafa Abdul-Jalil is a lawyer and is described as the chairman of the NTC.
I'm getting the feeling that we are meant to focus on Mr. Jalil and we are not meant to be as aware of the chair of the executive committee, Mr. Jebril.
So, let's try to keep from getting confused as the re-structuring happens.
I say this because there may be many more internal migrants within Libya as Mr. Jebril tries to implement his privatizing corporate takeover with NATO's assistance.
Not to worry, I'm sure Imperial NATO cares for black Africans as much as King Léopold II of Belgium did.
Many migrant workers are not fleeing the country now becaue they will have their jobs again as soon as the fighting stops and they fear the Gadaffi troops who still man many of the border crosssing areas. Many were killed by Gadaffi troops a few days ago and Gadaffi troops also murdered many being detained in a Gadaffi maintained jail in Tripoli...
The UN and NATO are sending in ships with medical supplies, baby food, bottled water and other necessities. There are now police back to work directing traffic in Tripoli and they say things are now beginning to get a lot better. The rebel leaders are having the thousands of tons of foul smelling garbage picked up again.
I expect to see a government form in Libya fairly soon and not a Gadaffi style government... I do not expect to see any of the NATO countries taking control or taking the oil as many falsely believe will happen.
Meanwhile; what happens to the $90+ billions the Gadaffi family has looted from the Libyian treasury and has stashed in England and other countries?
The main amount of loot for the Gadhafi's wealth is the $70 billion Libyan Investment Authority (LIA), a (sovereign wealth fund), established in London to spend the country's oil money... Gadaffi's sons know how to spend it..It's party time, with a million buck$ a pop for famous singers to sing at their birthday parties, etc, etc. The party is over Gadaffi, turn out the lights, surface and face the music... You might get off easy and not have to hang around like Saddam did.
'Meanwhile; what happens to the $90+ billions the Gadaffi family has looted from the Libyian treasury and has stashed in England and other countries?'
Gee I don't know, Wayne. But we do know what happened to the $110+ billions that the US and NATO countries 'froze' (read stole) from the Gaddafi headed Libyan government. They used this money to help overthrow him out of power did they not, Wayne?
And speaking of parties, when is Wayne going to speak out against the imperialists who party day and night after looting trillions out of countries like Libya?
Wrong ~~pinchyway~~,,, apparently you don't understand the word FROZEN.
The 110 billion in funds NATO countries froze are still frozen,, they will go to the new government of Libya once it has been established.
I wll not disagree that our government is corrupt... That has zip to do with the Civil War Gadaffi started in Libya, or the thousands of his own people and migrant workers he intended to kill so that he could maintain his power and his stolen loot.
If you read all of the comments I have posted at CD you would know that I have often spoken out against our corrrupt government looting our treasury. Those are totally seperate issues than the Civil War in Libya... I see you still support Gadaffi... I don't. ..
OK, go ahead and use the word NATO/ Pentagon 'frozen' instead of STOLEN, Wayne. Your choice of vocabulary gives you away, Guy.
And BTW, I never have supported the dictator, Gaddafi. It's just that I don't support his overthrow ordered from D.C. while you do. After all, your glibberal Democratic Party president who you voted for and still support ordered up this war, didn't he? Just like he has kept US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.
You think that our US government is corrupt while you believe that Obama is trying to 'clean' all that up, I believe that you have posted that delusionary belief before here at CD, have you not? Strange????%%% ...the things that some liberals believe. Incredible even! Just like your thoughts that Libya is being 'liberated' without outside regime change being responsible for it and being in place all the time.
~~pinchyway~~.... The manner in which your thought process works is extremely interesting, fascinating actually.... For one thing it was you who brought up the word FROZEN and you berate me for replying to you using that word... LOL.
And your assumptions about me supporting Obama and voting for him are 100% incorrect... On the contrary I have always said Obama is the modern Peid Piper. I'm an independant and wrote in Kieth Olberman for president. I would not vote for any of the candidates, nor will I this nexxt time. ... I do support the UN Mandate to support the rebels in Libya.
You are also wrong about DC and the Pentagon initiating the no fly zone and supporting the rebels in Libya... It was a UN mandate which gave NATO the authority to do that... Of course you knon that but won't acknowledge it. And you don't support Gadaffi? Is that so? __ You don't support the NATO forces or the rebels... Whom do you support in the Libya affair and Civil War? __ LMAO.
A shrink could write a book on you and make millions.
Is "Revolution" really the appropriate descriptor here?
Is "uprising"?
Is "democratic transition"?
It is just super-peachy that Ms. Chen is anti-Friedmanite economics.
It is even super-peachier that she has discovered a PC group to express concern for in this situation.
But that does not excuse using the Imperialist's B.S. code words as givens.
Yes, it's a good example of the "history is written by the winners" syndrome.
Now that the imperialist-backed "rebel" faction has closed in for the kill, even the so-called alternative mass media readily buys into the phony, manufactured "Arab Spring revolution" and "mass uprising against an oppressive dictator" memes to rationalize events in Libya.
The liberal interventionists who've been hiding under a rock since the original "humanitarian intervention" scam was exposed as a heinous fraud have come scrambling out to the head of the procession to cheer on this "victory".
It isn't Orwell's fault, but one unfortunate side effect of books like "1984" is that it gives shallow and unreflective liberal progressives the incorrect impression that "rewriting history" is something only right-wing totalitarians do.
Nice post.
This is no "revolution", this is recolonization.
A question - who printed and distributed tens of thousands of replicas of old timey Libyan royalist flags? How much did that cost and who paid for it? Where were they made and who placed the order? What's the turn-around time for that kind of job and what would that minor detail alone tell us about how long ago this was all planned from outside Libya?
It's stunning to me that not one journalist has yet posed thess simple questions. It's amazing what a corporate paycheck can make a person not be curious about.
The "Revolution" might be reaching an "Endgame" (though I'm with matti on the terminology), but the corporate acquisition is just getting started. Congratulations to future migrants on the 'opportunity' of being exploited by the 'good guys' instead of the 'bad guys'.
Though I must say I'm intrigued by the "Canadians" "and an Italian" picked up by the IOM. You would have thought they'd have done a runner a lot sooner. Cheaper than using CIA/MI6/DGSE logistics, perhaps?
I think someone needs to research the French / UK /NATO lead war game of Nov 2010 called Op Southland / Southern Storm - which was essentially a prelude to this FUK-US NATO assault on Libya [it even 'predicted' that R2P fig-leaf UN Res 1973 - which basically was FUK-US OKing themselves to attack Libya], & the fact that France, UK, the US & NATO [IE: FUK-US NATO] had covert operatives on the ground in Libya WEEKS BEFORE UN Res 1973- is a clear indicator that this most likely was NEVER a NON-VIOLENT UP-RISING that Khadaffi turned into a civil war, but a FUK-US NATO controlled operation from the GIT-GO!
And do you really believe that These Al-CIAeda / King Idris inspired rebels- who, largely falsely, accused Black Libyans & Africans [& even some darker skinned Asians] of being Khadaffi African Mercs- LYNCHING MANY IN THE PROCESS [as Ms Chen has noted here]- who also blatantly dis-respected AU leaders & diplomats trying to negotiate a cease-fire - are going make a safe environment for Africans migrant workers & treat them fairly & w dignity?! Do you really think its going to be safer & fairer for African migrant workers w these jokers in control than it was under Khadaffi [pre-civil-war]?! I DON'T THINK SO!
Hell expect things to get WORSE for Libya period - just do some homework & see how bad it was for the average Libyan when King Idris was in power [the Al-CIAeda /King Idris Rebel Flag is King Idris' old Monarchy Flag]- & how much things improved for Libya under Khadaffi! And see how bad it was for Libya & all Africa [& the whole 3rd World in general] under French, British, EU, US colonial rule IE- Half of Libya population was killed under the Mussolini Italians; 1 million Algerians were killed by the French, & a recent settlement revealed how the Brits slaughtered 10s of thousands in Kenya's so-called 'Mau Mau' revolt! And now these same CRIMINALS are champions of Libyan & African liberation & freedom?!- GIVE ME A BREAK - THATS BS!!!
PS: Ms Chen shouldn't have dignified this FUK-US NATO spearheaded assault on Libyan Sovereignty as a 'Revolution' - It was a Neo-Colonial lead Rebellion & COUNTER-Revolution!