EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Running Through Riotous London
Monday night in Hackney, where young people who bear the brunt of an austerity crisis took over the streets.
Yesterday, the streets of London were full of the rage of youth.
When I went out to photograph events, the situation was scary and volatile - but I met children who looked out for me, covering my back when I was using my camera, telling me when gangs and thieves were stalking me.
In the Hackney district of the city, the youth were intent on fighting the police. One boy told me that he was sick of being stopped and searched and that this was a settling of scores with the "Feds", as he called the police.
In 2009, Lord Carlile, reviewing police stop-and-search powers, found that Black and Asian youth in Britain were seven times more likely to be stopped and searched than whites.
Amid the volatile chaos on Monday night, criminal gangs took advantage of the situation. What self-respecting criminal gang would not? I saw a couple of 40-year-old white men heading into the middle of a stand-off between youngsters and police lines, carrying power tools and hammers. A bunch of boys were following, asking each other: "Are they are really going to do so-and-so's shop?"
Lack of awareness
On Twitter late last night, following the main bulk of the riots, I was astonished at the incomprehension generally expressed as to why they had occurred. There seemed to be an extraordinary lack of awareness that working class youth in Britain are being punished for the financial excesses of the banking collapse.
The public spending cuts this year meant many of the youth summer schemes in London did not run. These riots suggest boredom - and inarticulate rage. The youth are smashing and grabbing the things society tells them to want.
The coalition government's austerity measures have hit this generation hard. There will be no higher education for those who cannot take on burdensome debt. The chance of ever being able to afford to buy a home in London seems remote - except for those whose wealthier parents can provide the deposit for a home loan.
A generation of young people have been left behind by this coalition's policies and the policies of previous governments. How can these young people see that they have anything invested in British society that will enable them to become fulfilled and successful adults?
The comments on Twitter and Facebook, following Monday's riots in London, starkly reflect the class divides within Britain today.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



29 Comments so far
Show AllOver the last several days I have come to appreciate the many responses to the British riots on various sites condemning the rioters as irresponsible dolts. Now let's analyze the responses. Thousands of Brits are designated irresponsible dolts. How could so many members of a society be such? Certainly it could be pure genetic chance, but if so, why do other societies not produce such a high percentage of irresponsible dolts? Indeed, if the percentage of irresponsible dolts is so high, how do those identifying the irresponsible dolts as such not know they are irresponsible dolts simply getting judgment wrong because they are irresponsible dolts? Putting this aside and assuming rioters are irresponsible dolts, perhaps it is something in the physical environment which renders so many so incompetent. If so, then humanity ought to abandon the British Isles as dangerous. Alternatively, it might be speculated it is something in the social environment, not physical environment, which renders so many so irresponsibly doltish. Assuming this, then the riots should be a clarion call for Brits to evaluate themselves. . . . Naw, that's too uncomfortable. It's a lot easier to simply label the rioters irresponsible dolts.
Oh, by the way, is it true David Cameron has begun secret communication with Bashir Assad and the Emir of Bahrain, seeking advice on how to respond to the rioting in Britain?
Thousands out of 60+ million is not a "high percentage". Maybe you should consider that before you engage in "analysis". Even if 600k were rioting, that would only be 1% of the population. Not exactly what most people would consider a "high" percentage. Regardless of whether you agree with the riots, or not, or have a person somewhere in between, beginning with an incorrect statistica proposition just makes you look stupid.
Oh, thank you, now I see the light! All rioters are rioting because they are irresponsible louts! Got it! And, how does one detect an irresponsible lout in Britain? Why, they riot! All those not rioting are responsible non-louts! And, how does one detect a responsible non-lout in Britain? Why, they do not riot! Thus, rioters in Egypt and Bahrain and wherever, are all irresponsible louts because they are rioters. Or is it only rioters in Britain are irresponsible louts because they are rioters. Well, never mind, all I want to do is thank you, rfloh, now the scales have fallen from my eyes. Ummm, wait a minute, there seems one problem. Why are not a similar percentage of the population rioting in every country in the world? After all, the percentage of irresponsible loutishness should seem constant, unless there is something in the British environment which causes this irresponsible loutishness, which is missing everywhere else in the world. Darn, I'm confused again.
Ah back to the simplistic reductionist. manichean logic again, eh? Are you only capable of thinking in terms of yes or no, white or black?
When you look at a piece of pizza, and decide you do not want to eat pizza for dinner, do you then decide not eat dinner at all? If you look at that same piece of pizza the next morning, and decide that you do not want to eat it for breakfast, do you then also not eat breakfast at all?
So why do you resort to this kind of lazy childish thinking when posting on CD? You might think that your "logic" makes me look stupid, on the contrary, it only reveals your very childish command of logic. Only the very young, or those with a very poor grasp of logic, resort to the kind of extreme reductionist manichean logic that you appear to love to resort to.
And while you might not like the truth being pointed out to you, it doesn't change that thousands of out of population of 60+ million is not a "high" percentage. They might be oppressed heroes of justice sticking it to the feds, they are still not a "high" percentage.
But that % increases dramtically if you view it as rioting youth as a % of youth in the low income neighborhoods involved.
The numbers of rioters are very significant, and are a response from Youth who have shitty lives and no hope for betterment.
Sure you could make that argument. And I would agree with you. But then you would have to phrase it this way:
a somewhat high(ish) percentage of poor youth from poor urban areas....
That doesn't sound as impressive as saying a high percentage of the British population.
"These riots suggest boredom - and inarticulate rage. The youth are smashing and grabbing the things society tells them to want."
The only sensible thing which I read in the whole piece.
The youth involved in these riots are criminals, gang members, young males (largely black), who have no interest in education. They have been given everything in life - education, free health care, housing, youth projects and sports centres, yet they still want more.
They did not want to study, because that was not cool, they wanted to "chill wid da bruddas", deal drugs, get guns, show "dat dey de man".
These rioters are dressed in designer clothes, and they are stealing high value material goods, and more designer c,lothes, and then they are burning the houses and workplaces of hard working business people.
I for one cannot wait until the police start to use water cannon and plastic baton rounds, because these scum are ruining the lives of many innocent people.
Oh spare me the shit. THey haven't been given everything in life, at least not compared to the bankers, politicians, top police, top media etc.
If they are behaving selfishly, they are only following the examples of their "betters".
"These rioters are dressed in designer clothes, and they are stealing high value material goods, and more designer c,lothes"
Actually they aren't. Not unless you consider sneakers, track suits, and hoodies from JD Sports as "designer clothes".
What is very notable, and very suspicious about these riots, if that the rioters have avoided targetting the high value stores, the designer stores, the posh areas.
Although desiring to spare you "the shit," again rfloh, although you continue to edify my, still I am left with confusion. You deny, "If they are behaving selfishly, they are only following the examples of their 'betters,'" when we have, first,
“Different sciences have various explanations for why people do what they do. . . . Economists . . . argue that if we want an analysis that’s simple enough to apply to policy problems, . . . heavy psychological explanations are likely to get us mixed up. At least to start with, we need an easier underlying psychological foundation. And economists have one—self-interest. People do what they do because it’s in their self-interest.” [David Colander, Microeconomics, sixth edition (Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2006), 188.]
Secondly, we have,
"Published on Wednesday, August 10, 2011 by MSNBC
The Empathy Ceiling: The Rich Are Different — And Not In a Good Way, Studies Suggest
The 'Haves' show less empathy than 'Have-nots'
by Brian Alexander
Psychologist and social scientist Dacher Keltner says the rich really are different, and not in a good way: Their life experience makes them less empathetic, less altruistic, and generally more selfish." @ http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/08/10-7
Considering this information, please, please, please, rfloh, explain to me how it is rioters in Britain are NOT "behaving selfishly, [and not] only following the examples of their 'betters'." Following your commentaries on CommonDreams.org I have come to believe in your insights.
Expectantly,
philandrel
Go take some reading lessons.
I did not say they are not behaving selfishly.
I said that they are behaving no more selfishly than the bankers etc.
If you cannot understand that difference, you reallly really do need to go back to school. But then, I'm not surprised that you cannot understand that difference. People like you, can only see issues in 1 or zero terms.
Oh spare me your bovine scatology rfloh. I did not note that any of the rioters and looters were naked or without shoes. Most of them also seemed to be pretty well nourished. They were not stealing sneakers, track suits, hoodies and electronic appliances to eat them.
It was also notable that in one community in London the only store that the rioters did not loot was a bookstore. The bookstore was untouched while surrounding businesses were devastated. The rioters were interested in sneakers, track suits, electronic appliances and hoodies but damn sure were not interested in stealing books that had an educational value.
Why have these thugs not marched upon Parliament, 10 Downing Street, Fleet Street, the City financial district, or Scotland Yard and committed the same type of property crime that they have committed against the honest business people and homeowners that are members of their own communities?
These riots are not peasant revolts analogous to the peasant revolts of the Middle Ages. Much of this rioting is plain hooliganism. How is it any different than the hooliganism we sometimes see associated with European soccer matches?
Stop drawing a moral equivalency between what these rioters and looters are doing largely to people within their community who have caused them no harm and the harm that bankers, politicians, top police, and top media etc cause.
Banditry and thuggery are despicable whether they are committed by the citizenry or committed by those within power.
"Oh spare me your bovine scatology rfloh. I did not note that any of the rioters and looters were naked or without shoes. Most of them also seemed to be pretty well nourished. They were not stealing sneakers, track suits, hoodies and electronic appliances to eat them.
"
Oh spare me your lack of reading comprehension. I did not say that the looters were destitute, shoeless, and starving.
"Stop drawing a moral equivalency between what these rioters and looters are doing largely to people within their community who have caused them no harm and the harm that bankers, politicians, top police, and top media etc cause.
"
Why not? Both the rioters / looters and the bankers, politicians fiddling their expenses, police in the pockets of the corporations, media constructing lies, have demonstrated the same attitutes of me first consumerist capitalism: "me, me me, I want, I want, I want, you can't stop me, I take, I take, I take". The mentality is EXACTLY the same. They do it because they can. They grab what they want. Because they want to. And because they can.
"Banditry and thuggery are despicable whether they are committed by the citizenry or committed by those within power.
..
Well yes. Which is why I am pointing out the similiarities.
Yes, or yes, "Photius," it is despicable as to the proportion of Brits who engage in "Banditry and thuggery," as opposed to almost every other country in the world. However, I must disagree with you on one matter. Certainly these rioting miscreants are "different than the hooliganism we sometimes see associated with European soccer matches," because those engaging in "hooliganism . . . associated with European soccer matches" tends to be exhibited by non-minority Brits, and non-minority Brits do not seem to be currently rioting. Thus it is as rfloh has noted, only those who are currently rioting, "are behaving selfishly."
You are just throwing shit against the wall:
1. Rioting at British soccer matches is a thing of the past, it hasn't been an issue for close to 20 years. That you choose to bring it up just shows how out of touch you are. And if you think that soccer hooligans are tolerated in the UK, you again reveal yourself to be way out of touch. One reason why rioting at soccer matches is a thing of the past, is because the authorities, football and legal, have taken exremely harsh positions towards rioters: suspensions of season tickets without refunds, life bans, confiscation of passports. These harsh bans are used widely, not even for rioting, ie outright physical violence, but also, for racist taunts. Combined with the ever increasing ticket prices, no one (whether "non-minority" or "minority") riots at soccer matches nowadays, simply because no one can afford to do so.
2. The vast majority of those rioting in Manchester, were white, ie "non-minority", so there goes another of your "theories"
Hint, if you know little, or worse nothing, about the context in which some event is occuring, don't blather. The more you blather, the more ignorant you reveal yourself to be
philandrel,
Please don't misrepresent what I wrote. I said nothing about the race, nationality, or ethnicity of the rioters or looters. I also did not say nor infer that Brits have a greater propensity to engage in acts of banditry or thuggery than people in almost every other country of the world.
In the film footage that I have seen broadcast of the riots in Great Britain, the rioters have been both Anglo and non-Anglo. A significant amount of the property crime that has been committed has been committed against non-Anglo Brits.
Have you seen any data that has reported on the demographics of the rioters and looters? Is the racial composition of the rioters and looters reflective of the racial composition of Great Britain?
deleted
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/10/birmingham-riots-anger-deaths
"Groups of residents in Winson Green, the inner-city area where the men were killed as they tried to protect local businesses in the early hours of Wednesday, openly warned of inter-communal violence if the murder inquiry fails to produce rapid results.
Their anger was passed on by the local Labour MP for Ladywood, Shabana Mahmood, and the Bishop of Aston, Rt Rev Anthony Watson, who joined a meeting at Dudley Road mosque, which locals claimed was on looters' hitlist of targets where money might be found. The victims, brothers Shazad Ali and Abdul Mussavir, 32 and 30, and Haroon Jahan, 21, were among some 80 young men who turned out after a gang tried to ransack the nearby Jet petrol station on Monday night."
Still think that this is just a case of white vs non-white? Still think that these riots are such a good idea?
You're a nasty brutish racist pig. I cannot wait for you get caught by some rioters who smash your bigoted head!
No one listens to the poor, except when they do something dramatic like rioting. During the riots, reporters will speak to the disenfranchised poor. But as soon as the riots end, reporters will talk only to the rich, who will condemn the poor as violent enemies of civilization. Then the rich will go forward and cut more and more social programs and jobs, because they can.
The rich are different and mostly sociopathic. For thousands of years, humans have based their societies on hierarchical structures, modeled on their religious beliefs (or perhaps the other way around, no one knows). People at the top in modern societies have gotten there with ruthless determination. We know that a tremendous amount of change has occurred in the human genome in the last 10,000 years, brought on by the move from hunter gatherer societies to agricultural societies. From adaptation to drinking milk and eating grains, humans have changed. But I believe the genome has changed also because of the great advantage gained by a few by a complete lack of empathy and a cold-blooded willingness to do anything to get to the top.
We see this sort of individual in every society in every era. Obama, W, Clinton, and their counterparts in other countries are merely heartless mass murderers.
We can decry the rioters, but in the end, the harm they cause pales before the harm caused by the elites every single day.
The rioters were interested in sneakers, track suits, electronic appliances and hoodies but damn sure were not interested in stealing books that had an educational value
Well not really...you can bet that almost all that has been looted has now been sold on at least once...very little of what was actually stolen will problably be kept. Books are hard to carry and you won;t be able to sell many copies of 'War and Peace' down the pub. We know that in several places people were seen to be dividing up the spoils very quickly. The 'loot' wll be converted into cash asap, less easy for the police to track. Promising arrest and long prison terms really is a non starter, the prisons are overcrowed as it is and I'm not sure we really want a new generation of criminals graduating from prison with new improved criminal techniques. Further many or these young people would view a prison sentence as a rite of passage, a badge of honour among their peers. We can decry this mind set all we like but prattling on about it won't change it. Peaceful protest is well worth a try but the police don't have a great record of tolerating that as was seen at Fortnam and Masons not so long ago. Marching on Parliament might have some success or not as was the case prior to the various wars so much money and energy have been lavished on. Its very improtant not to equate trying to undersand behaviour with condoning it....the violence we have seen is inexcusable. I lived in South London for some years, just north of Croydon and was heart sick to see Reeves furniture go up in flames. A dreadful waste indeed. This will be a long hot summer I fear. One question does spring to mind already though..CCTV was promised to be a deterrant to crime...what happened....perhaps it will prove usufull in apprehending the culprits but I suspect there are some 'ring leaders' Fagan types whose faces won't be seen. I don't have any easy answers, I'm not even sure of the questions any more but anger, frustration, pure bloody mindedness and a perception that there is nothing left to loose are very bad bedfellows. Oh and please don't prattle on about how education is the key...I know several people with good degrees from excellent UK unis who haven't found work since they graduated 2 years ago and its not for the want of trying.
In America we've had over hundred and fifty years of oppressing blacks, and at any time those black people had the moral right to rise up and kill their oppressors (as all oppressed people do). In an age of endless western wealth - wealth past civilizations could have only dreamed about: machines do the almost all the labor - why do so many, particularly the young feel disenfranchised, and hopeless? Because the international economies have focused on the endless and "mindless" pursuit of wealth for a tiny minority of people and not a broad based prosperity.
But they are calling these riots "mindless" violence. Mindlessness was America's housing crisis. It was the most affluent in society doing something absurdly stupid and then being bailed out. Mindlessness is thinking swapping paper back and forth between the stock market, gold and silver, currencies, and bonds will somehow create real jobs.
Though riots may appear mindless, they often have real benefits to the communities rioting. Riots have real economic gains: large scale theft (a vigorous redistribution of wealth); insurance companies are forced to pay out, so meaningful sums of money can be forced into circulation; rebuilding creates jobs; firefighters, cops, lawyers, judges, and the whole social justice system is ramped up; factories have to make the
replacement cars and other items; essentially riots can accomplish what governments are failing to do, transfer static (fictional paper) wealth from the rich and simulate local real economies. Ya, it's a horrible way to go about reinvigorating an economy, but obviously their government and welfare Royals aren't doing any better, or there wouldn't be riots.
And of course another reason the young are rioting is because capitalism has convinced them their lives are meaningless without all the stuff it dangles before their eyes to beguile them, ironically, into surrendering more and more of the means to get stuff.
One good that will come out of this, which we could use in America, is when it's all over their police will be a lot more reluctant to shoot someone.
When the poor and unfortunate people of Britain are treated like excrement day after day after day....I guess there reaches a point where they decide to act like excrement.Negative reinforcement.
Good Luck to them.
Our materialist and consumerist culture is getting what it deserves: rioters who go for the goods that they have been teased with for years while watching the dumb box.
I gave up "stuff" decades ago. The shiny or plush new objects are rarely worth the time I'd have to spend laboring for them.
Bling is way over-rated.
But the bling serves again as a distraction and a way to promote racist classist and authoritarian memes about society and politics.
But the youth are RIGHT to rebel. At this point these riots have been England's most powerful reaction to the Great Austerity, and the underlying fascism and misery that it represents,
We have entered the wobble zone of the Long Emergency.
Some examples of wobbling:
the recent behavior of the stock market and of the U.S. Congress, the insurrections in Europe and the Middle East that get stuck in mid-stream, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that go nowhere, the climate catastrophes, the ecological disasters, the corporate media's constant lying and denying about the ambient wobbling, the fate of nuclear power, the oscillating price of oil, the recession - recovery back and forth, the bail outs that yield few or no results, the growth economy that refuses to grow, the oil that withholds itself, et cetera.
OK, lets get a few things straight here.
The original riots on Broadwater farm estate, started following the shooting of a criminal/gang member/drug dealer who carried a gun (listen to his relative's comments if you do not believe that he carried a gun). The family and friends of this man are criminals and gang members, who would rather the police left them alone to commit their criminal acts.
The original riots were composed manily of young (14 - 25) black youths, who are themselves gang members/drug users/criminals. Then the rest of the dregs of society, the people who do not want education, do not want to put any effort into making a good life for themselves, they started to riot.
Certain communities have been taking a stand against these riots - Asian, Turkish, Kurdish, African, poor people who have built small businesses from scratch, only to see them burnt and looted.
These are not protests, they are wanton violence and destruction by the criminal classes, who have been allowed to get away with crime for decades, without being punished.
This is no "Arab Spring", where decent people are fighting against dictators and tyranny, these are people who have been given every chance in life and thrown it away, preferring the life of "Gangstas" (from a very early age) to education and work.
To those who say that these "rio;ters" have nothing in common with Arab Spring, I have to say that isn't at all the case. What about the economic royalists in the City (London's financial district) parasiting off those who actually have always created the while the coalition gang in power acts for them to divide and rule the British people for the benefit of this same over wealthy, over pampered slime just like those on Wall Street in the USA? When are those, as British Labor used to say even on party cards, who create the weatlh going to share in the fruits of their labor," and most especially blacks and others of color though surely many ethnic Britons also suffer under weight of the hierarchal system's oppression? This used to be a basic fact that at least Labor didn't ignore. Today they do so at their and their country's peril.
Now let's start having more light on the subject and less heat and hot air, as "Light goes together liberty" as Thomos Jefferson once said. Oh, we're talking about liberty for all from the parasite in the City and the rest of the real criminal element in London and else in the British state or the UK.
If Jeffeson had only kept his passage in the Declaration of Independence on slavery and advocated what John Locke had already said about govenments being responsible for providing necessities of life for those without whether employed or not, then the USA could have implemented much of British Labor's 1945 manifesto in 1801 at least when Jefferson got elected president with his party taking the congress and been the example for all to follow that would moved all this world toward a better day. We now know this and I have that original draft of that great document which launched a war of national liberation which launched this nation and would later be cited by no less than Ho Chi Mihn.
To those who say that these "rio;ters" have nothing in common with Arab Spring, I have to say that isn't at all the case. What about the economic royalists in the City (London's financial district) parasiting off those who actually have always created the while the coalition gang in power acts for them to divide and rule the British people for the benefit of this same over wealthy, over pampered slime just like those on Wall Street in the USA? When are those, as British Labor used to say even on party cards, who create the weatlh going to share in the fruits of their labor," and most especially blacks and others of color though surely many ethnic Britons also suffer under weight of the hierarchal system's oppression? This used to be a basic fact that at least Labor didn't ignore. Today they do so at their and their country's peril.
Now let's start having more light on the subject and less heat and hot air, as "Light goes together liberty" as Thomos Jefferson once said. Oh, we're talking about liberty for all from the parasite in the City and the rest of the real criminal element in London and else in the British state or the UK.
If Jeffeson had only kept his passage in the Declaration of Independence on slavery and advocated what John Locke had already said about govenments being responsible for providing necessities of life for those without whether employed or not, then the USA could have implemented much of British Labor's 1945 manifesto in 1801 at least when Jefferson got elected president with his party taking the congress and been the example for all to follow that would moved all this world toward a better day. We now know this and I have that original draft of that great document which launched a war of national liberation which launched this nation and would later be cited by no less than Ho Chi Mihn.