EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Balanced Budget Amendments Don’t Work: Look at State and Local Gov't Stats
Republicans are barnstorming across the country in support of a balanced budget amendment. This, they say, will force government to “live within its means” and lead to surging economic growth, though I’m not really sure how they get from A to B. But we don’t really have to guess about the impact of a balanced budget amendment, particularly during recessions. Because we’re seeing the effects right now.
Since the technical end of the recession in July 2009, the public sector has 430,000 less jobs.
Government employment is now 1.9 percent lower than it was at the start of the recovery, a drop of 430,000 jobs. In contrast, government employment rose by 1.1 percent (or 232,000 jobs) during the equivalent part of the last recovery.
In a testament to how weak the last recovery was, private sector hiring is actually better in this recovery. But the government employment cutbacks counteract it.
As we know, state and local governments cannot print money and are limited by statute in their ability to run deficits. So instead of borrowing in a recession when faced with a budget shortfall, they raise taxes or cut spending. Increasingly during this recession, they opted for the latter. As a result, we are seeing a catastrophe in public sector jobs. These are teachers, nurses, sanitation engineers, cops, firefighters, all being put on the street because state and local governments have to balance their budgets. And while the federal government provided some aid in the stimulus package to help states and localities manage, that has mostly faded away. So more cuts are in the offing.
We saw this with the latest jobs report. The private sector added 154,000 jobs, a solid if unspectacular number. But the public sector lost 37,000. Put those two numbers together and the numbers look far worse. Some have speculated that most of these were due to the government shutdown in Minnesota, which has since ended. But as the graph above shows, this trend has been happening for some time.
Austere government cutbacks, forced by state-level balanced budget requirements, have created a drag on the economy. As Jared Bernstein writes:
That line going down: this is your job market on a balanced budget amendment, another great Republican idea.
Indeed.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

4 Comments so far
Show AllSo jobs are moving from the public sector which adds no wealth to the economy, to the private sector that does. This is bad?
Police, firefighters, teachers and municipal workers who maintain the infrastructure (roads and bridges) keeps the economy going and does indirectly add to the wealth of a city or state. You know, a good educational system is an investment in the future and it attracts businesses and more affluent residents. Firefighters keep businesses from burning to the ground, that's an indirect wealth advantage. Police prevent crime which helps businesses to flourish.
Whoops, that should have been keep and do in the first sentence of my previous comment instead of keeps and does. The public sector workers maintain a functioning society upon which businesses can safely and reliably flourish. Without the functioning base or foundation which public sector workers maintain, there wouldn't be that benign atmosphere in which businesses can prosper. We depend on our roads being plowed in the winter, on police and firefighters supplying safety, aid and rescue during natural disasters.
JerzyJoe, Being a public servant myself, for many years and in many roles, I do value my fellow-workers and many of our contributions. That being said, we do NOT add wealth to society. We socialize risks and costs, lowering the obstacles to those who produce wealth.
If public employees were limited to public safety, education, and infrastructure, we might come to agreement on the societal impact of this shift in employment patterns. However, I have also been a small business owner, entrepreneur, laborer; a producer of goods and services. Many public employees are engaged in the restriction, constriction, and taxation of those who would or do produce wealth from natural resources, or from the sweat of their labors. These we can quite well do without in most cases.