EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Tycoons Laughing All the Way to the Bank
There are likely few characters less loved in America these days than hedge fund managers — widely regarded as among the archvillains of the 2008 Wall Street meltdown.
So, months ago, when Washington embarked on a frenzied search for ways to reduce the massive U.S. deficit, a tax loophole that allowed hedge fund managers to pay tax at the exceptionally low rate of 15 per cent certainly seemed like low-hanging fruit.
Cancelling the loophole would save the treasury $20 billion over 10 years, and the public would surely be unmoved by the pain inflicted on hedge fund managers — the top 25 of whom took home an average pay last year of $880 million each.
But as the stakes rose in the bizarre negotiations over the country’s debt ceiling, the Republicans managed to push reluctant Democrats into taking all tax increases off the table. All deficit reduction was to come exclusively from government spending cuts, hitting the middle and lower classes hard.
Perhaps this seems like evidence of how resistant Americans are to tax increases. In fact, it shows no such thing. Rather, it shows how a band of far-right Republican Tea Party extremists — financed initially by the billionaire Koch brothers — have managed to effectively take control of the U.S. political system and block the will of the American people.
For the past two years, Americans have repeatedly told pollsters that they support higher taxes on the rich as a way to reduce the deficit. A Washington Post poll last month, for instance, found 72 per cent supported raising taxes on those earning more than $250,000.
The battle over whether to cut spending or raise taxes predates the birth of Elvis. But for decades, compromise was found between the Democrats’ support for social spending and the Republican desire to lower taxes, particularly on the rich.
That changed in the mid-1990s, with the rise of a more radical, aggressive Republican flank. Led by Newt Gingrich and backed by big corporate money, these radicals adopted a no-compromise approach, obstructing all Democratic efforts to enhance social spending, while relentlessly pushing for ever lower taxes, regardless of the impact on the deficit.
Since then, the Republicans have grown ever more extreme, intransigent — and flagrantly indifferent to the public good.
Once the party of Eisenhower-style moderation and fiscal restraint, the Republicans have become the party of big deficits — mostly due to tax giveaways for the rich.
Inheriting a surplus, George W. Bush added $5.07 trillion to the debt, primarily due to his tax cuts and secondarily to his wars, while Obama has added just $1.44 trillion, mostly fighting the recession, according to data from the Washington-based Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
All this set the stage for the hair-raising drama played out in recent weeks over raising the debt ceiling.
With the power to push the country into a Latin-American-style default, the Republican extremists had a loaded gun. And in their sights was not just holding the line on social spending, but their ultimate fantasy of dismantling popular New Deal social legislation — particularly social security — that has seemed untouchable since the 1930s.
In fact, the “debt ceiling” is an artificial creation. The U.S. Constitution doesn’t call for one. Except for Denmark, no other advanced democratic nation has a debt limit. Overseeing government spending is what the political process is all about.
But a radical rump of Republicans, threatening to pull the trigger, succeeded in forcing Democrats to abandon tax increases on the wealthy — at a time when America’s wealthy are as rich as the tycoons of the Gilded Age. Feeling the gun at their temples, the Democrats joined the Republicans in the quest for deeper spending cuts — which will only make the disastrous U.S. unemployment situation worse.
So while programs helping students, the elderly and the poor have been picked over with surgical precision, hedge fund managers can get back to work destabilizing financial markets with full peace of mind, knowing they’ll continue to enjoy a tax rate lower than the mechanics who service their private jets.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

50 Comments so far
Show AllSo Linda would you vote for the Obomber again..?
Seems to us that the people of the good old usa need a champion that will
just say no to the banks, the military industrial complex, and the wealthy of this country. Mr. Obomber has shown who he responds to and it is those fat cats.
I was reading some of FDR's speeches the other night and it is almost enough to make a grown man cry to see what passes for a Democrat these days.
Seeing as how she is Canadian, I don't think she voted for him in the first place.
And you can safely bet your last nickle that Obomber will never include any references to or quotes from FDR in any speech even though Obama frequently refers to and quotes Ronny Raygun.
Obama had the golden opportunity to call the Republicans' (including tea partiers) bluff in December 2010 when the Bush tax cuts expired. Had Obama done nothing to extend the cuts, there was nothing anybody (Republican, Democrat, or otherwise) could have done. With a Republican controlled Congress on the Jnauary 2011 horizon, Obama knew that he would not have another oppprtunity to end the cuts.
Instead, Obama extended the cuts and threw in the "payroll tax holiday" that defunds Social Security. Republicans have tried and failed for decades to defund Social Security and Obama initaited defunding wothout the Republicans even asking and with little opposition from his Party.
Repetition is a crucial communication technique, but these articles are getting tiresome. They're all saying the same thing about this faux battle between the democrats (pretending to be reasonable while playing to Wall Street's hand) and the republicans (pretending to be wacko while playing to Wall Street's hand). And the people lose. Bernie Sanders and Dennis Kucinich speak for us, but really, how much power does that yield? That's all part of the show too: you see here, kiddos, you have a voice in Washington! Right.
apparently they are not tiresome enough because the repetition is not being listened to.
The people already lost - and we know that. It is the point that a new game must start or we will only hear the tiresome rats... rats... rats....
My own state reps don't hesitate to say i am NOT considered an american. Despite their wins by only 10% they use REPITITION of saying they are speaking for america.
I live across the country from Mr. Sanders but he is the only representation available to me and i am taking advantage of that by hitting his site as many times as possible.
So what is the answer? If we have no voice in washington or in our own states we have to find an alternative. I find these articles a validation that I am not alone with my views and i applaud these sites for saying it over and over again - to counter the
repetition is SEE on my "news".
I do agree about your characterization of the two parties. When i was a kid; my dad took my mom aside and told her that ONE of them had to be the good guy and one the bad - for her to chose .... so they could obtain their mutual goal.
help me out here with some numbers...
the top 25 hedge fund managers make an average of 880 million per year EACH.
Do they make this every year?
How much tax do these HFM pay on 880 million?
How many of them are there?
what do the poorest make?
BTW I am a PhD and make 45,000 /year. After taxes and health insurances I take home $29,000
To make 880 million I would have to work for 19,555 years............
Because it's investment money I believe the Hedge Fund managers are taxed at 15%. Pretty sweet huh? If you actually work for a living you get taxed at 25% or more. Sit around do nothing and just examine you bellybutton and your stock portfolio and you get taxed less.
How do they make this every year? The game is rigged, that's how.
"What the news media missed is that hedge-fund managers don’t even pay 15 percent. At least, not currently. So long as they leave their money, known as “carried interest,” in the hedge fund, their taxes are deferred. They only pay taxes when they cash out, which could be decades from now for younger managers. How do these hedge-fund managers get money in the meantime? By borrowing against the carried interest, often at absurdly low rates—currently about 2 percent." -- David Cay Johnston, April 13, 2011
To read the entire story, you can go to the following link:
http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-17350-9_things_the_rich_do.html
Amy Goodman/Democracy Now! has interviewed Mr. Johnston several times. If you are interested, you can go to www.democracynow.org and search for those programs. Just enter David Cay Johnston into the search box.
Speaking of Democracy Now- Folks might want to read Amy's interview of Economist Michael Hudson and Author William Hartung, that was just broadcast today..
If only "Democracy Now" was available to all American's as A "News" option, as opposed to the "bullshit as usual" Corporate owned, operated, sponsored spin pandemic we are all exposed to on A constant basis. Orwell still "Rolls in His Grave"....
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/8/2/after_months_of_partisan_wrangling_wall
so the tea party is the villain once again undoing the hapless dems and their moribund exec obum von obummer
dash my spirit to hell i cry hands around my own neck in the much feared strangelovian death grip
dash my spirit to hell
the punch and judy show called politics has got to have these apologists to create the illusion that "our guys" would have done so much better if they could have shaken them damn tea party nuts....
blah blah blah
moose shite in large piles is what that is
meanwhile back at the congress - these men and women who can't seem to be able to take a leak without staining their suits and dresses - these same fools have done alright in the stock market
"The median personal wealth for members of Congress grew to $911,510 in 2009, up from $785,515 in 2008, according to the Center for Responsive Politics... Overall, members of Congress saw their personal wealth grow by more than 16 percent during the worst economic downturn in the United States since the Great Depression."
http://iplextra.indiatimes.com/quote/0csngHK7Yh1mW?q=Top+News
'A new study titled "Abnormal Returns From the Common Stock Investments of Members of the U.S. House of Representatives," in the journal Business and Politics, finds that "a portfolio that mimics the purchases of House Members beats the market by 55 basis points per month (approximately 6% annually)."
The abstract explains:
A previous study suggests that U.S. Senators trade common stock with a substantial informational advantage compared to ordinary investors and even corporate insiders. We apply precisely the same methods to test for abnormal returns from the common stock investments of Members of the U.S. House of Representatives. We measure abnormal returns for more than 16,000 common stock transactions made by approximately 300 House delegates from 1985 to 2001. Consistent with the study of Senatorial trading activity, we find stocks purchased by Representatives also earn significant positive abnormal returns
The Center for Responsive Politics says this "indicates that members of Congress have a significant information advantage in making financial investments when compared to average, and even corporate, investors"
http://www.minyanville.com/dailyfeed/2011/05/25/shocker-legislators-investments-generating-abnormal/
they can't save the country or order a ham sandwich but they have made fortunes for themselves
we need an arab spring to deal with wall street, mic, corporations, politicians and hedge funds
they all need a clip job
"A previous study suggests that U.S. Senators trade common stock with a substantial informational advantage compared to ordinary investors and even corporate insiders. We apply precisely the same methods to test for abnormal returns from the common stock investments of Members of the U.S. House of Representatives. We measure abnormal returns for more than 16,000 common stock transactions made by approximately 300 House delegates from 1985 to 2001. Consistent with the study of Senatorial trading activity, we find stocks purchased by Representatives also earn significant positive abnormal returns."
medmedude, I read the very same report. Thanks for posting!
Isn't insider trading supposed to be against the law? Oh, that's right -- laws don't apply to all people equally, do they? Some are MORE EQUAL than others.
Yes, we here in the U.S.A. also need an Arab Spring -- but where are the people? I live in NYC, and for the most part, I can report from here that most protests and rallies I attend are very small, especially when you consider that more than 8 million people live within the 5 boroughs. If I was still living in Lincoln, NE, a rally of 150-200 people would be something to celebrate. But, here in NYC, it all adds up to pathetic. In fact, signs at many rallies continue to follow the status quo -- Republicans/Kochs bad, Democrats good.
"When will they ever learn, when will they ever learn?" -- from Pete Seeger, "Where Have All the Flowers Gone?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1y2SIIeqy34
Everyday, I talk to people, as many as possible, but many people, even friends of mine, would prefer to NOT know, over being informed.
kay: its been a long hard ride over the last 30 years to this point and many folks are demoralized and/or beat down
many folks consume corporate media for 6 hours a day and many simply do not understand what is going on
many are medicated
many are afraid
we have no leaders
we have turned our backs on each other so many times that there is nothing to look back to
"The Sheep Look Up is a science fiction novel by British author John Brunner, first published in 1972. The novel's setting is decidedly dystopian; the book deals with the deterioration of the environment in the United States. It was nominated for the Nebula Award for Best Novel in 1972.
The title of the novel is a quotation from the poem Lycidas by John Milton:
The hungry sheep look up, and are not fed,
But swoln with wind and the rank mist they draw,
Rot inwardly, and foul contagion spread .."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sheep_Look_Up
"TURNING and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
The darkness drops again; but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born? "
wb yeats
as we await the arrival of the rough beast we hear the relentless ticking of the clock in a train station
MED: Good post.
KAY J: Nice to see you back!
In a time when checks and balances still existed, when Supreme Court justices might recuse themselves when faced with a fiduciary conflict of interest, when the head of a government department might not seamlessly move through the revolving door to win status at the very corporation s/he was expected to regulate, we might also note the conflict of interest reflected by these not exactly stock "averages," in the way of performance.
When things get this corrupt, you KNOW the center will not hold... The Coming Apart is in progress.
Coming Apart ~ death throes of an age for the dawn of the age of Aquarius
... A train has to leave the station before another one can come in.
As far as the title of the piece -- those who laugh last laugh best!
thanks Siouxrose - i trust you are well
Just more pathetic democract apologetics.
.
Since the mid 90's, according to the author, the radical republicans backed by corporate money have been standing in the way of the (ostensibly(?!?) corporate money free) democrat efforts to "enhance social spending."
.
What on Earth is she talking about? Wasn't it Bill Clinton who said the era of "Big Government" was over? A democrat prez leading the charge to cut social spending ... hmm, sounds familiar. I wonder what Obama means when he talks about "shared sacrifices" ... must mean he plans on enhancing social spending!
.
But apparently in the dialect of blue party apologetics newspeak "enhancing" something really means to decrease or damage it. Sort of like when Barry Obombs says he has a plan to "strengthen" social secuirty.
If your read the byline at the bottom, you would notice she is Canadian. In my conversations with Torontans, I learned that most Canadians really don't understand how bad things are here.
Yes most Canadians see Obama as a "celebrity" much as they see Clinton. They somehow feel that "Democrats" are a lot like folk in Canada and would like to be more like Canada but those evil Republicans stand in the way.
One thing that you will find is how upset so many will get if a US President does not mention the Importance of Canada in one of their speeches.
If an Obama or a GW Bush just adds "Our friends and close allies in Canada..." to virtually any speech they get positively giddy.
I think it part of the old legacy of Empire where once part of the British Empire a Canadian Political leader was not seen as a success until they were acknowledged in Westminster. Now it Washington DC.
John Raulston Saul has touched on this.
I always find it disturbingly strange that We had to fight A Revolutionary War to gain our Independence from Britain, while Canada just had to wait and gained their Independence through years of Diplomacy and of course helping Britain in their Wars of Empire..
1931 was about 160 years later than our Independence, but A 160 year wait theoretically saved one hell of alot of misery and bloodshed....And now, the average Canadian has A better life than one of us...All of the sacrifice of paying taxes, Labor strife, poverty, Human Rights struggle and War throughout the years, and for what???
So did everybody enjoy the show Congress, the Dems and the Pubs put on for us? I wake up this AM and the debt ceiling bill had already easily passed in the House, and there is little doubt it will get 60 votes in the Senate. WTF?
My guess is that this is blatant enough to not to be lost on many Amerikans. Of course seeing both parties are involved in screwing the pooch this time around it's impossible to throw the bastards out. Isn't our party system just wonderful.
Maybe we need to get a discussion going here on where the best places to buy cat food. Oh I heard the Pentagon got an extra $40 Billion more than they expected. Remember support the troops...
No we still need to “throw the bastards out” of both parties- absolutely necessary! It is a free for all- we need to restart our government and send BIG messages to all.
Call it RETRIBUTION by the people.
With what I see going on here in Michigan I totally agree with your sentiments...I hope the Koch Brothers and their ilk ROT IN HELL for eternity...
I just don't see the anger on the streets as in Wisconsin...Maybe Michael Moore is cooking up another Documentary for us all..
And still Wall St. is not happy.
Among the cuts that occurred were those to veterans which apparently were condoned by both major parties. Perhaps the deal that was consummated between the Democrats and the Republicans was that the Democrats would cave on allowing Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid to be carved up while the Republicans placed veterans' benefits on the table so that it, too, could also be sliced up. So much for the Republicans standing up for those people whom they always proclaim are the true heroes of this country by taking away any financial remuneration that was due to those who had served in the military.
In these trying times one would think that a candidate or candidates would emerge who would either challenge Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination or an independent candidate would arrive on the scene who would stir the imagination of the people by fighting for the rights of the American populace. Where are Eugene V. Debs or "Fighting Bob" LaFollette now that this country could really use these two loquacious rebel rousers?
To recall Simon and Garfunkel:
"Our nation turns its lonely eyes toward you"
How about this ?
http://www.pressaction.com/news/weblog/full_article/jackowski07102011/
Or about this?
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/secs-co-chief-counsel-derivatives-such-abacus-worked-paulson-co-and-signed-abacus
"For the past two years, Americans have repeatedly told pollsters that they support higher taxes on the rich as a way to reduce the deficit. A Washington Post poll last month, for instance, found 72 per cent supported raising taxes on those earning more than $250,000."
Wow, thats REALLY telling. How can you even peddle tripe this ridiculous? If you ask people "Hey would you like people (not you, others) to pay more in taxes so you can have nice stuff", what do you think they will say? Of course people making less than $250k want those who do to pay more in taxes. Welcome to the obvious you shill.
Bring back Eliot Spitzer, please! At least he had the balls to go after those asshole, greedy, parasitic thugs on Wall Street.
We need a good Democratic contender for Obama in 2012? But who?
RFK Jr.
It has become quite clear over the past few years that there are members of both parties that no longer represent the people of the United States. They have become too concerned with being reelected, and they have become too infused with ideology and talking points so instead of doing what they are put in office to do, represent the people of this country, they instead look out for the special interests who funded their campaigns.
This is a huge problem with out current system, and we here at GovTogether want to change that by giving some power back to the people of the United States. We want to allow you to make these decisions.
Let us know what you think of our idea. Come over to www.GovTogether.com and let your voice be heard now.
"Campaign Finance Reform" NOW !!!
"Reword"and "Repost"...
Ending insider trading by members of congress would be a great start:
http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/congress-refuses-to-outlaw-insider-trading-for-lawmakers-478701.html?tickers=%5Edji,%5Egspc,%5Eixic,brk-a,brk-b,gs,xlf
Lets all remember that the POS dems had the House, Senate and White House until Jan and could have raised the debt level And pass a budget BUT Nancy Pelosi - a member of the Progressive Caucus said 'lets make the repubs do something besides just say No.
So here we are falling for the repub-dem shell game.
Never underestimate the harm that bribery does and this just goes to show how lobbying will circumvent any measures to stop it nonviolently in a sense. Lobbying is influence peddling and bribery. The quaint and illusional legal way to keep the rich getting any and everything they want. Since law enforcement and the courts just turn blind eyes to the practice there is little the people can do.
So no matter what the debt charade was theoretically to be for helping the country, it was, and anything else like that debt scam, totally rigged to benefit the rich every time. One day the people will wake up and see shit like this for what it is and if they are not all in jail, they may just decide to do something, we can only hope.
Just like all the other articles we see... long on analysis, but absolutely desolate on alternate solutions.
Years ago I went to a Sun Ra concert shortly before he died, and the band started the show by making a slow procession towards the stage and chanting "Not my world; Not my idea". I now understand the wisdom behind these words.
Let's start living our lives according to what we KNOW is right... not according to what is AUTHORIZED to be right!
How naive you are. I know for a fact college education should be free for anyone willing to work hard. Yet I don't know of a single one who'd let my kids attend, just because it's what I know is right. How about before telling others how to live, you get a real life in the real world THEN provide some alternative solutions.
In a Reuters News article today Obomber "urged tax reform to emerge from" his Super Cat Food Commission with a "balanced approach" in which the rich pay more taxes to achieve more deficit reduction.
"Obama urged Congress to pass stalled trade bills and said he wants tax cuts for the middle class and unemployment benefits extended.
"'I'll be discussing additional ideas in the weeks ahead to help companies hire, invest and expand.'"
[Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/02/usa-debt-obama-idUSN1E77119U20110802]
This Super Catfood Commission has been set up to fail without tax increases on the rich. When it does, spending cuts ONLY will be across the board. Obama is a sociopathic serial LIAR. Every word and bit of punctuation that spews from his Romulan lips is a LIE. A regressive VAT tax and a half-way decent carbon tax MIGHT result from it, but they will do so to protect the super-rich from tax increases. They will be insufficient to offset war spending (with new wars with Iran and Syria looming large) and will continue to claw cuts out of the most economically vulnerable.
More "free trade" bills signals even MORE accelerated offshoring of jobs.
More unemployment benefit extensions will not help or employ the rising number of long-term unemployed (who've exhausted their maximum 99 weeks in the States that even allow that maximum--a limit that Obama will not go beyond) and are not offset by revenue increases by raising taxes on the rich.
More middle-class tax cuts will likely translate to another extension of that portion of the Bush wartime tax cuts that are still in effect for the middle-class. These are also not offset by revenue increases from raising taxes on the rich.
"...additional ideas in the weeks ahead to help companies hire, invest and expand" will translate into more corporate welfare tax cuts, kick-backs and similar incentives at the federal and State level that will also continue to claw at revenues with no new revenue enhancement from taxing the rich or corporations.
Companies typically use such incentives to move their operations from a more unionized region of the country to a non-unionized "right to work" State and then OFFSHORE when they deem it cost effective.
Obama is a prescription for a full blown Second Great Depression for those with pre-2008 incomes below $39,000 a year, and he will hurt many with incomes above that.
Democrats give away to the Republicans what they hope they can promise to voters in the next elections.
Demopublicans and Republicrats are flunkies for the Ruling Party.
USers, Americans, there you go again! The first two comments in line here are not about the article itself, but about the nationality of the author, Canadian this time, or English another time. I am getting the feeling that CommonDreams is doing very well in educating us by means of foreign voices; we'll get used to it, but we need time, sort of like the Tea Partyers. I am also getting the feeling that some of the readers do not like blondes or women or neither.
Oh yes, Common Dreams is just a nest of xenophobes, and misogynists, not to mention those freaked out by blondes.
So each of these tax pambered individuals take in more every year than the rest of the combined American population earns in a lifetime?
You can add the GFC bailout for racketeers and the economic stimulus packages to Bush's deficit splurge. They were racked up because Bush took his eye off the ball while pursuing the imperial elite's crusades.
How do the Tinpot Party and Republicans expect to their fund foreign misadventures when all the wealth aggregates with incorrigible tax dodgers and grifters? There will be no crusades, super profits and super wealth when society ceases to function because government lacks revenue. It appears that the psychopathy of the rich is that they are prepared to lose everything rather than give a little so that the wheels of civil society are oiled.
Arc up the bbq, 'long pork' is on the menu.
Ah Linda also believes in the awesome powers of the Tea Party, and the poor powerless Democrats. I'm too exhausted with the delusional meme to set her straight.
Oh yes, Common Dreams is just a nest of xenophobes, and misogynists, not to mention those freaked out by blondes.
شات الحب - شات مصري - دردشة مصرية - شات
Wow; I'm still dumbfounded that charges have not been levied against the thieves and liars in congress. The 14th Amendment specifically states:
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.
Is this not clear enough?
Yes, it is. But with a dysfunctional law enforcement and judiciary that won't work as intended, who's going to step in and do the job? Just like the way congress looks at the constitution as that 'goddamn piece of paper' as the bow legged dwarf so eloquently called it in his criminal terms as president, congress gladly does also, like 'monkey see, monkey do'.
There is a shit storm of past debt and abuse about to rain down upon humanity and those who survive SHALL NOT command vast wealth nor great armies... For these will be useless in the hour of need...
Bill Maher suggests a new party of left-leaning nut jobs called the 'Donner Party' to offset the loony tea-bag party. See it at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/07/bill-maher-liberal-tea-party_n_920268.html
I suggest the first act we choose to do is not pay anymore taxes. I work my tail off and bring home next to nothing, while the rich are having a real yuck on us.
Why is anyone surprised????? The President and over half of Gongress as well as the membeers of the Supreme Court are MILLIONAIRES!!!!!
They're simply looking after "their own!"
Of course our "Democracy" has turned into a Plutocracy in the process, but that was bound to happen given who we have put into power! And it'll be "HELL" trying to right it!!!