When U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visited Greece, she praised the Greek government’s austerity measures to reduce deficits and cut spending. The U.S. and Greece face a common challenge of dealing with soaring deficits, but they also face something else in common: a refusal to deal with out-of-control military spending. And given that the United States is a major arms seller to Greece, Hillary Clinton will encourage the Greeks to slash workers’ wages and pensions, but not its enormous military appetite.
With a population of just 11 million, Greece is the largest importer of conventional weapons in Europe—and ranks fifth in the world behind China, India, the United Arab Emirates and South Korea. Greece spends a whooping 3 percent of its gross domestic product on military hardware, compared to an average 1.7% in the other European NATO countries, including nations involved in international conflicts such as Britain, France and Germany.
The justification has been the ongoing disputes with Turkey over
Cyprus and disagreement over the
sovereignty of certain islets of the
Aegean. But for years now there has been no military conflict over these decades-old disputes, and relations with Turkey have been steadily improving.
I recently spent time with Greek activists who have been camping out in Athens’ Syntagma Square to protest the austerity program. They are not happy with Clinton’s visit, or her thumbs up for a financial package that slashes wages, reduces pensions, increases joblessness and privatizes government services. And they noted that the very nations in the European Union and the United States that have been pushing the Greek government to squeeze Greek workers are the same ones that have been, for the last decade, pushing Greece to purchase massive amounts of worthless weapons.
Nikos Milonas, a member of the Greek Green Party, said that Germany, France and the United States have been the biggest purveyors of weapons, weapons that have only benefitted foreign corporations. “If we had slashed our military spending years ago, we wouldn’t be in this crisis,” he said. Military spending over the past 30 years accounts for over 1/3 of Greece’s current debt.
Much of the equipment comes from Germany, the country most responsible for bailing out Greece and the loudest in condemning Greeks for living beyond their means. When German Chancellor Angela Merkel scolded the Greek government "to do its homework" on debt reduction, she wasn’t talking about revisiting the over one billion dollars that Greece had spent on two submarines from Germany or the more than two dozen F16 fighter jets it bought from the United States at a cost of more than 2 billion dollars.
Greek Alternate Defense Minister Panos Beglitis, who is in charge of military procurement, said Greece would postpone military purchases as the nation struggled to pull itself out of a financial crisis that has pushed it close to bankruptcy. But it remains in talks with France over the purchase of six frigates, while Germany, France, Israel and the United States are eager to sell the country more fighter jets.
According to Sissy Vovou, a member of the Anti-Militarist, Anti-Nationalist Initiative, Greece’s recent cuts in military spending have been ridiculously small. “Our government has cut the military budget by a few percentage points when it should be dramatically slashed,” she said. “But the government is afraid to go against the military, as well as the foreign governments where the weapons manufacturers are based. They are telling Greece that if it wants a bail-out, it must keep buying weapons we don’t need or want.”
When Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan visited Greece in May 2010, Greek Deputy Prime Minister Theodore Pangalos was
quoted as saying that he felt "forced to buy weapons we do not need," and that the deals made him feel "national shame."
The people of Greece are fed up with this wasteful military spending. “Our government cares more about the demands of a few powerful nations than the needs of its own citizens,” said 22-year-old Achima Tzavaras, who has been camping out in Athens’ main square for weeks. “That’s why there has always been plenty of money for new tanks, missiles, submarines and fighter planes but not for schools, hospitals and public transportation.” Tzavaras, who has been unemployed for a year and helps organize other unemployed young people, said the government should focus on creating jobs not buying weapons.
The same could be said for the United States, which is undergoing its own financial crisis while maintaining massive military expenditures. But don’t count on Hillary Clinton advocating an austerity plan for Greece or the United States that would alienate her friends in the weapons business.
27 Comments so far
Show AllGreece should not pay one penny to any German bank as payback for the Nazi occupation of Greece during WWII. Payback is a bitch.
wall street came, they stole all their money, then they said "you can't pay your bills" so you have to take away more and more stuff from the regular people to give to us to pay what you OWE us, after we rigged everything of course
military industrial complex also must be fed too
Most of the world is being slowly but surely bankrupted because of massive, unnecessary military spending. And no one supports this suicidal course more heartily and fanatically than Barack Obama and his surrogate-in-arms, Hillary Clinton. Of course, Merkel and Sarkozy are on board, as are every other leader of the "developed" world, all suffering from arrested development. They worship at the altar of Mars (see Sioux Rose) and pay homage every day to war profiteers, or corporate masters of war who run the whole fucking world.
This is all we are now, along with morally blind idiots and fools denying the causes of global warming, much of which is also caused by intractable addictions to militarism. The US military uses more fossil fuels than most of the rest of the world. Without profligate and routinely wasteful burning of petroleum, our military couldn't operate for one day.
Militarism is destroying life on the planet and killing the planet into the bargain. And STILL we elect one criminal administration after another, from both wings of the Business Party, to "represent" us. It would appear that what we want represented is our unflinching demand that life on earth come to as early an end as we can possibly devise. H. Clinton and B. Obama are key operatives in realizing that end.
All the leaders that are on board with the austerity measures are members of the Bilderburg group. They got their new marching orders of austerity measures at the last meeting.I agree with you that militarism is destroying this planet, but that is the plan. Wipe out the peasants, the rich have more to play with.
Anyone here a Stargate SG1 fan? Reminds me of 2001 where the Auschen come and rescue Earth, but induce a vaccination that exterminates 90% of lives. Just the 10% left work to feed the Auschen.
Thanks for the reference, Ephraim. There are few articles on C.D. that don't reinforce the premise that uber: militarism (i.e. Mars rules) is dominating (or should I say governing) priorities, at a time when so many nations can ill afford further investments in arms. There is both the obvious waste, as seen in a dearth of funds to finance the programs that matter: solid eduation, investment in necessary (Green!) infrastructure, help for the needy, back to work programs, etc. Yet there is also a less visible karmic account which, as the late Yogananda related, presents a direct relationship between disharmony in the natural world (of the type that gives rise to all the costly droughts, floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, etc.) and human beings' continued reliance on weapons to "solve" their problems.
I had no idea that Greece was such a main-line MIC purchaser. It could well be that it will default on these lame-brain, self-destructive (for all the conceits about "Defense Spending") items, and demonstrate to the world (and whomever still pays attention in the land of the dumbed-down) how morally bankrupt it is to invest in what never improves society, and either wastes away, or invariably consigns another facet of the world to misery.
This August 2 debt ceiling financial drama is really upsetting a lot of people who need more stress like a hole in the head. Maybe a few wing nuts will start shooting at Wall Street?
Humanity is facing a number of cautionary tales in progress. Heavy stuff!
"I had no idea that Greece was such a main-line MIC purchaser."
-----------------
Neither did I Siouxrose!! Just when I think I can no longer be surprised -
Please visit another nasty surprise - I've posted a comment there:
Subhankar Banerjee:
“Another Kind of Fukushima?” asks Whistleblower Robert Gilkeson
--------------
Manysummits
=======
Think of it this way. A great many of us including myself who had to work against our own goodwill did so for survival. Could it be that Greece is in the middle of a Catch-22? The pattern that is emerging is having to choose
A) goodwill at the cost of going economically bankrupt
or
B) survival at the cost of going morally bankrupt
Pick A and get called a "threat to the economy" or B and get called a "baby killer". Sad, isn't it ?
fuck hillary clinton
here's some advice we should be giving her - hit the road jackie before we string you up as a nwo war criminal with your hubby bubby
papandreau is a nwo shill - third generation - after the amerikan backed general's coup of the 70's greece has been a vassal state of amerika
after the last bailout (sic) he set his friends up to cash 27 billion of credit swaps, bought 3 billion dollars of arms from germany (actually it was part of the "loan") and hundreds of millions of dollars of french fighter jets
who in the fuck is about to attack greece - answer no one
the austerity measures have killed 10% of the greek economy and will translate into deaths among the old and the newborn
nwo say the greeks are lazy and have lived opulently above their means
having been to greece many times i can tell you that is utter bullshit - most greeks are dirt poor
what killed that country was the amerikan takeover and the fascist government that has been stealing the few crumbs the amerikans have left behind
they need a revolution to get rid of this cancer, we need one, spain needs one, hey - the whole world need one
we need to shake off the rothschilds banking/debt prison - the sooner the better
You're spot on about military hardware expenditures Saudi an other example, TENS OF BILLIONS of dollars on the latest jet fighters, on regular basis, their enemy a handful of nomads citizens, with camels & goats asking for basic human rights & freedom of speech OR WOMAN asking for the same.
The merchants of death work hand in hand with the merchants of illusion BANKERS.
it is IMPORTANT to remember that canibal capitalism with cheney, halliburon, blackwater flavour all wrapped in the war of terror, CREATES, MANUFACTURES the fundamentalist, man who sells fruits & vegetables in the local market, sees his country invaded, assaulted, or controlled with military basis, or imposed economic shackles , or the establishment of a puppet regime by foreign powers in the absence of progressive structure or culture often suppressed & decimated by the very regime the US establishes, the man in question has no other choice than join the new preacher in town. The same happens in Utah or some other state its just dormant for NOW. As a (taliban) bush was infinitely more devastating to humanity than the worst of the taliban. Interesting that the current leadership prefers ot look at the future, refuse to look at the past, yet manage to see images of the past with the tilaban in them in the same picture cheney & bush are not present.
From the west & in the east (from bin ladin to the Taliban all the way to the saudi house of cards) it is the powers to be that creates, decide when to use the forces & when to dispose of them when no longer needed, the only way they can control the masses.
By a proxy of a dictatorship a fundamentalist one is preferable, if Iran was pro US none of the hostility would exist, but SOUDI ARABIA IS, notice the difference, its as clear as water.
Religious fundamentalism (((CROSS THE BOARD))) does NOT talk about class struggle & alienation & injustice visa-vis of the worker, freedom of speech, equality & opportunity for both genders, the need for balanced media, education without dogma, art & a creative society & vision, the opportunity to choose ones spirituality if need be, the ability to kiss a woman or a man in the middle of the street without having to look above your respective shoulders & very importantly the ability to say (((NO))) when tyranny knocks on your door, when adversity is unbearable.
Fundamentalism as a recipe for capitalism
is so successful they are even trying to establish a version of it inside the very headquarters of the failing & falling empire, against the American people by introducing A WOMAN WITH A conservative & religious PROFILE for the (republicans) A WORD DEVOID OF MEANING
They've tried with sara palin but she was not good enough, slope, immature, without much education, she could dance a little but has no lyrics to go with, she was their first, failed experiment with WOMAN by the corporate republican party.
They choose an other one a little education, a tiny more refined with a , cleaner cut, slightly more composed, less volatile do not indulge in hunting grizzlies, (not good for environmental image), nevertheless just a little more sophisticated but nevertheless still a zombie from the same school that gave us g w bush.
Many may have not read, Naomi Wolf, Naomi Klein, Chomsky, Howard Zinn, Arandati Roy or Sartre, they will still SEA through the new deceit of the republican corporate reps & the military industrial complex.
No doubt we must sea the human in here, under no circumstance can we hate, torture or kill, but ,we must also remain vigilante, ultimately they become our cheney, bliar & bush our executioners.
We cannot allow more criminals the power to deny the people the right to speak, the vision to build a better society, the power to make it happen & the tools to resist & fight back oppression & repression in any shape or form.
Dear Hilary you can scream all you want, the fundamentalists in Egypt & Tunisia are being taken care of by their own people precisely because you cannot get too involved like you use to be, I've no doubt in the corridors of power the empire is active especially since the invasion of Libya.
If given the chance the Egyptian people CAN , yes they (((CAN))) & they're doing it.
WHO IS TAKING CARE OF YOUR OWN FUNDAMENTALIST? THE Fondamentalists are not in front of you, they are behind you including the tanks & the think-tank, they wear ties, carry brief cases, others have stamp collections on their chests & shoulder they don't deserve, they may not were turbans they are way more lethal.
BY NOW we know It is the empire that supported fundamentalism the taliban the soudi regime for decades.
America has never allowed a nation a chance for true self determination. a country that will choose a true democracy with an egalitarian society with the wealth, resources, limitations, wisdom passion & vision such a nation is either assaulted directly, provoked than assaulted with the delusional self deference doctrine or simply framed & than invaded, undermined within & isolated to self destruct from within, with a little help from outside.
WE NEED TO LOOK IN THE MIRROR. CAPITALISM IN AMERICA, AUSTRALIA, & THE FEW ENLIGHTENED ONES ARE PRIVATISING PUBLIC ASSETS, PUPLIC PROPERTY, LAND, PARKS, ROADS, highways BRIDGES, COMPANIES, FACTORIES, HOSPITALS, SCHOOLS, PUBLIC SERVICES, THE LIST GOES ON.
In the words of Michael Parenti they don't want to privatise SOME things, they want EVERYTHING.
THEY ARE DISMANTLING UNIONS, RECRUITING MORE MAN IN UNIFORMS REINFORCING THE POLICE & MILITARY STATE, BUILDING MORE WALLS, DISMANTLING ALL LEGISLATIONS.
IF BY ANY CHANCE YOU HAPPEN TO BE A WHISTLE BLOWER & HAVE AN ITCH TO SPEAK THE TRUTH, THEY'LL GIVE YOU THE BRADLEY TREATMENT. (MAKE NO MISTAKE HE'S THEIR MESSAGE TO US.
IF YOU HAPPEN TO FORGET EVERYTHING MENTIONED ABOVE, PLEASE REMEMBER IRAQ & THE OTHERS.
I don't know how they can show their faces every morning in that house that is everything but white, I guess I had the privilege to meet some of the most puzzling psychopath in my life & yes they CAN smile in the face of the most horrific crimes.
Some statements can never be forgotten.
“Gentleman Iraq is open for business”
or
Katrina earthquake
“We could not get rid of public housing
god intervened and cleansed it for US “
or
Simply a picture of
Hitler caressing his German Shepard.
I was listening to economist Michael Hudson being interviewed yesterday on Boiling Frogs (link below). Greece, he said, is being held hostage because Wall Street has made multi-billion dollar derivative bets that they won't default. So rather than Wall Street losing even $1 the 11 million people of Greece are pushed into austerity hell.
What percentage of Americans do you think understand the economic death grip the U.S. and it's army of primary bank terrorists have on nations such as Greece? I'd venture less than 1%.
http://archives.kpfa.org/data/20110713-Wed1300.mp3
First to Medea: Your indomitable energy to working for what is right and finding out the truth are an inspiration. Thank you & more power to you.
Cygnus: Thanks for that link. The interview was a lot easier to follow than some of Hudson's articles. Moreover, according to him, the people of the US are or will be as squeezed as the Greeks are being now. Many people across the country are living it, but the MSM is not writing about it, and, unfortunately, it's going to get worse & quite obvious.
We, the people, have to realize that it is no longer isolated incidents & must stand against injustice of any kind wherever it is happening, even to people we might not admire & even if we are not at the level of energy as a Medea B.
For everyone that doesn't believe in "conspiracy" theories, what is happening on a global scale sure is coincidental, huh?
I mean, with all of the major Western economies facing similar "crises", there sure seems to be a "one plan fits all model".
First, you get neo-liberal shills in place to co-opt every "leftist" party the world over - "socialists" in Greece, Spain, France, "Communists" in Italy, the Democratic Party in the United States - then manufacture a crisis and - voila - use the situation you've created - one in which groups that would normally oppose capitalism's inherent corruptions are now the ones ramming "austerity" packages down the citizens' throats - to bring forth a "new world order" or, in plainspeak, fascist neo-feudalism.
I mean, instead of writing column after column about what our co-opted and fascist leaders should do, why not examine why/how NO government in the western world - bar Iceland - has taken the most logical step and declared the entire situation a theft on a heretofore unimaginable scale, one putting the welfare of their nation's people above the dictates of the oligarchic psychopathic cabal that seeks to dominate the globe.
No more names like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, Sarkozy, etc etc and any other mention of the motives and "should dos" of these criminals.
We are way past the point of needing to collectivize this struggle and since they are treating us like a group of insignificant, faceless serfs then every writer and person on the true left should begin to treat our psychopathic overlords the same way.
They are a cabal of criminals attempting to enslave, steal and kill off the people they supposedly "represent".
At this point we are well aware of their names and motives and only by treating them as we have been treated to this point will we move forward.
As they don't care about our welfare. We will not care about theirs.
As they don't care about our lives. We shouldn't reflect on theirs.
As they don't care about our futures. We should lose any reflections on theirs.
We have been patient for too long. We have been tolerant.
To quote a famous movie, "they drew first blood" and we should never forget this fact.
You nailed it. That is exactly what is happening. One word. Bilderburg, or Bildenberg. Google them.
All the leaders go to these meetings before they are sworn in.
The world should rise up, but there are so many people here in just the US that says the wealthy deserve the tax breaks and it is the poor people that are bankrupting us.
I see this all the time on Conservative state's website. Either that, or it is the illegals.
Oh, you and your tinfoil-hat "conspiracy thinking"! Haven't you heard of Occam's Razor? Besides-- surely someone would have talked!
OK, I couldn't resist rattling off a few items from the Top Ten List of smug, supercilious put-downs of "conspiracy thinking". I've always been especially mordantly amused by the self-styled logicians who wield "Occam's Razor" harum-scarum, like a switchblade in a 1950s gang "rumble".
Not to mention that "someone would have talked" is another canard-- the real problem is the willfully deaf ears. Apparently most people didn't take the song "Beans In My Ears" seriously enough. ;)
Avoid loan sharks like Goldman Sachs.
Medea Benjamin has more depth to her than the entire Administration and the entire Congress put together.
See the movie "Z".
-30-
To oldmanriver
Very good choice.
& great film to sit & debate among friends.
Take good care
Hillary "should," "won't," "will?"
Nothing Hillary actually said is quoted. This is purely a hit piece from Code Pink. It obliquely references a statement of support for Greece's economic plan, and then weaves a web of defamatory speculation from there.
Why doesn't Code Pink say "don't count on Obama to advocate an austerity plan that would alienate [his] friends in the weapons business?"
Our "out-of-control military spending" is Reagan, Bush I, Bush II and Obama's doing.
Borrow and spend, deficit-creating economic policies? That's Reagan, Bush I, Bush II and Obama as well.
The financial system collapse of 2008? Bush II.
Bail outs for too-big-to-fail banks? Bush II and Obama.
Austerity programs in the U.S.? Obama and his Republican pals in Congress.
Yet Code Pink mentions none of these culprits.
They want to hang it all on Hillary Clinton. Why?
Why indeed. Obama didn't get elected president by accident. It took a lot of people manipulating public opinion from numerous vantage points to make that happen. And those same people are still busy doing it.
"They want to hang it all on Hillary Clinton. Why?"
Because Clinton went to Greece and spewed the nonsense.
It is misguided to toss darts at Medea and CodePink.
I'd take a planet full just like them.
Code Pink doesn't even tell us what she said. If it's nonsense, why don't they quote it?
They might as well blame Fukushima on the people who put on hazmat suits and ran to the plants after the tidal wave hit.
Too lazy to look it up? Parading ignorance and apathy as someone else's failing?
If it was there, they would have quoted it. That's the point. They don't quote what she actually said (much less report what she actually did) because it doesn't fit with their defamatory hit job.
Naturally, don't take this personally and I know you're a big Hillary fan but for your own good, please stop and accept the fact that had Hillary been elected that she wouldn't have been much different from Obama. Hillary may have looked a bit more "progressive" than Obama when comparing each of their votes as senators but Hillary is a pro on her timing while Obama just so happens to be a loose puppet shill for Corporate America and the Military Industrial Complex. But I'll give you a chance to prove that unlike Obama, Hillary would have actually gone all out to significantly motivate and help the American people lessen their dependence on Corporate America and the Military Industrial Complex so that the average working stiff wouldn't have to end up picking between goodwill and having to work at Mcdonalds, Home Depot, AT&T, Northrup Grummen, Bank of America, etc... just to survive. By the way, describe and prove that Hillary Clinton would have been better at moving this country towards more green jobs.
There's no way to "prove" what a person will do in the future. Your request is nonsensical. The way to judge a person is by the actual record of what they have done in the past.
Here are seven votes taken in the U.S. Senate by Hillary, Obama and McCain on some very critical issues.
With the wisdom of hindsight, these votes revealed what Obama would actually do after becoming president, on issues of "average working stiff" v. "Corporate America," on environmental protection, on energy/green jobs, on preserving our Constitutional rights, and on reigning in the "Military Industrial Complex."
Obama has acted as president in the same ways he voted as a Senator. It's reasonable to believe the same would be true of Hillary, were she to become president.
(1) Tort "reform" (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Vote taken: 2/10/2005
Analysis: Opposed by more than 68 consumer, civil rights, environmental and labor groups, it was described as the "final [Republican] payback to the tobacco, asbestos, oil and chemical industries, at the expense of ordinary families whose health has been compromised."
Clinton: No
Obama: Yes
McCain: Yes
(2) Dayton Amendment (S.Amdt. 31) to the 2005 Bankruptcy Act
Vote taken: 3/3/2005
Analysis: Would cap credit card interest rates at 30%. Senator Dayton provided examples of predatory lenders charging vulnerable people more than 1000%/year interest. Republicans argued that "free-markets" should set interest rates, and government should not interfere.
Clinton: Yes
Obama: No
McCain: No
(3) Energy Policy Act of 2005
Vote taken: 7/29/2005
Analysis: Often referred to as the Dick Cheney Energy Bill (industry lobbyists wrote it in secret in his White House office), this corporate-welfare bill was called "bad policy" by Public Citizen because it gives "billions of dollars in unjustified subsidies to the fossil fuel and nuclear energy industries," rolls back environmental regulations for the oil and gas industry, and "repeals the Public Utility Holding Company Act (PUHCA), an essential consumer protection that ensures that electric utilities exist to serve the people, not the profit interests of large corporations." It also exempted natural gas companies' fracking operations from all EPA regulations. Senator Obama claimed it was a "green energy" bill.
Clinton: No
Obama: Yes
McCain: No
(4) Dorgan Amendment (S.Amdt. 1665) to the 2005 Commerce Appropriations Bill
Vote taken: 9/15/2005
Analysis: Would prevent future NAFTA-like trade deals that allow "dumping" of products into the U.S. at prices below their cost of acquisition (harming U.S. farmers, ranchers, businesses and workers), by prohibiting the Commerce Department from weakening current countervailing duties and anti-dumping laws.
Clinton: Yes
Obama: No
McCain: No
(5) Nomination of Dirk Kempthorne to be Secretary of the Interior
Vote taken: 5/26/2006
Analysis: Hard right-winger who received an overall score of zero from the League of Conservation Voters during his six years in the Senate.
Clinton: No
Obama: Yes
McCain: Yes
(Hillary and just seven other Democrats voted to block Kempthorne's nomination.)
(6) Feingold-Reid Amendment (S.Amdt. 3164) to the 2008 Department of Defense Appropriations Act
Vote taken: 10/3/2007
Analysis: Requires the President to safely redeploy all U.S. troops from Iraq by June 30, 2008, except for those needed for al Qaeda operations, security and training. Shutting down the Iraq War in June 2008???? That's three years ago!!!!
Clinton: Yes
Obama: NV
McCain: No
(7) Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) amendment (H.R. 6304)
Vote taken: 7/9/2008
Analysis: Legalizes warrant-less wiretapping of, and spying on, Americans by the federal government in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. Covers up and excuses more than 30 felony crimes committed by President Bush when he authorized the illegal wiretaps. Provides retroactive immunity to lawbreaking telecom companies and terminates all pending lawsuits against them.
Clinton: No
Obama: Yes
McCain: NV
When I asked to prove, I didn't mean prove what Hillary would exactly do but what she would likely have done. I apologize for not being clear on that.
Now about those 7 points, #1, #2, #3, and #5 I wouldn't bother questioning her timing. #4 never got a good followup from either Obama or Clinton. I would have appreciated it if Hillary would have chosen to cancel NAFTA. #6 and #7 remind me of a discussion on how Hillary would have voted on those and other issues had she been the nominee. Maybe she would have voted the same or maybe done the same thing as Obama. Hillary's vote on Iraq in 2002 and defending that vote until the end of the close presidential primary when she desperately changed her mind on Iraq and regretted her vote. So many times she has been called neoconservative and she didn't fight that accusation. It's good that she was honest about her intentions as president while Obama turned out to be a slick fraud. Her tone and attitude leaning a bit too conservative all throughout the campaign and the young vs old identifying vote caused her to lose. Sorry but I'm no fan of Hillary or Obama.
Don't know what you mean by "not questioning her timing."
Don't know what you mean by "#4 never got a good followup." Obama voted against it and the measure failed.
On canceling NAFTA, Hillary campaigned on the pledge to renegotiate it and include labor and environmental protections. Obama copied her pledge when the primary was close and he needed Ohio, but got caught simultaneously sending his senior economic adviser Austan Goolsbee to secretly meet with Canadian officials to assure them his NAFTA pledge was empty campaign rhetoric.
Don't know what you mean by "how Hillary would have voted on [#6 and #7] had she been the nominee." She was the presumptive nominee and far ahead of Obama in the polls when the Feingold-Reid vote was taken. As to FISA, there was no reason she would have voted differently had she won the nomination. FISA was very unpopular. Obama voted for it because he's a right-wing ideologue and he knew neither corporate media nor McCain would challenge his vote.
On the Iraq authorization vote in 2002, Obama was not in the Senate then so there was nothing to compare. However, he later said on several occasions that if he had been in the Senate in 2002 he "probably" would have voted for it. Given his pro-war voting record in the Senate (2005-2009) it's clear he definitely would have voted for it.
As to Hillary "changing her mind on Iraq" at "the end of the primary," I think you are laboring under a false impression. See my list here:
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/07/21-2
Young people voted for Obama because they PERCEIVED him to be the anti-war candidate and her to be the pro-war candidate. But, the truth was the opposite. Young people were manipulated and played for fools by Obama, corporate media and shills posing as progressives.
If I'm a "fan" of any political candidate it's Ralph Nader. But, I'm also a fan of the truth. And the truth is there were and are very significant differences between Hillary and Obama. Of course corporate media backed the corporate candidate. More galling are the shills who smeared Hillary and pimped Obama. Most notoriously,The Nation magazine, CODE PINK and CommonDreams. They are now making hay by criticizing Obama, but they continue smearing Hillary, and former President Bill Clinton. Know your true enemies.