Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- In Blind Poll, Republicans Choose Progressive Budget Solutions Over Their Own Party's
- Not Guilty By Virtue of Videotape, Which, Unlike the Police, Doesn't Lie
- The 'Land of 10,000 Lakes' Is Running Dry
- Manning: Before Wikileaks, Leaked Docs Offered to NYT, WaPo
- Bob Woodward Embodies US Political Culture in a Single Outburst
Popular content
Today's Top News
If the Sea Is in Trouble, We Are All in Trouble
The report that the ocean is in trouble is no surprise. What is shocking is that it has taken so long for us to make the connection between the state of the ocean and everything we care about – the economy, health, security – and the existence of life itself.
If the ocean is in trouble – and it is – we are in trouble. Charles Clover pointed this out in The End of the Line, and Callum Roberts provided detailed documentation of the collapse of ocean wildlife – and the consequences – in The Unnatural History of the Sea.
Since the middle of the 20th century, more has been learned about the ocean than during all preceding human history; at the same time, more has been lost. Some 90 per cent of many fish, large and small, have been extracted. Some face extinction owing to the ocean's most voracious predator – us.
We are now appearing to wage war on life in the sea with sonars, spotter aircraft, advanced communications, factory trawlers, thousands of miles of long lines, and global marketing of creatures no one had heard of until recent years. Nothing has prepared sharks, squid, krill and other sea creatures for industrial-scale extraction that destroys entire ecosystems while targeting a few species.
The concept of "peak oil" has penetrated the hearts and minds of people concerned about energy for the future. "Peak fish" occurred around the end of the 1980s. As near-shore areas have been depleted of easy catches, fishing operations have gone deeper, further offshore, using increasingly sophisticated – and environmentally costly – methods of capture.
The concern is not loss of fish for people to eat. Rather, the greatest concern about destructive fishing activities of the past century, especially the past several decades, is the dismemberment of the fine-tuned ocean ecosystems that are, in effect, our life-support system.
Photosynthetic organisms in the sea yield most of the oxygen in the atmosphere, take up and store vast amounts of carbon dioxide, shape planetary chemistry, and hold the planet steady.
The ocean is a living system that makes our lives possible. Even if you never see the ocean, your life depends on its existence. With every breath you take, every drop of water you drink, you are connected to the sea.
I support this report and its calls to stop exploitative fishing – especially in the high seas – map and reduce pollution and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. But I would add three other actions.
First, only 5 per cent of the ocean has been seen, let alone mapped or explored. We know how to exploit the sea. Should we not first go see what is there?
Second, it is critically important to protect large areas of the ocean that remain in good condition – and guard them as if our lives depend on them, because they do. Large marine-protected areas would provide an insurance policy – and data bank – against the large-scale changes now under way, and provide hope for a world that will continue to be hospitable for humankind.
Third, take this report seriously. It should lift people from complacency to positive action – itself cause for hope.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



27 Comments so far
Show AllWelcome to Common Dreams Sylvia!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I have your most excellent book at home "The World is Blue", and I am very glad to see you on this site. I discovered Common Dreams while looking into Fukushima.
Are you marching on Washington DC with James Hansen, Wendell Berry, Maude Barlow, David Suzuki, Bill McKibben etc - or, what do you think of this idea?
Manysummits
======
Read up on the history of Cholera, you'll lose the idea that humans will do anything about the problem until it's nearly too late in nearly every case; especially if it costs the rich more money. I'm becoming more pessimistic as time passes, I think our only hope lies in a massive economic collapse that precedes, and hopefully prevents, the environmental one. But I'm not going to bank on that after the last set of bailouts the economy saw...
Eat, Drink and be filled with merry thoughts, we're fucked.
The economy, being the most fragile of structures, if it can even be called that, is already in the process of collapse. The next stages involve large numbers of human deaths. I don't see any way out of this. Pessimism cannot be deep enough for this situation. I don't think there is any place to hide or any action to take to mitigate this. I am so glad that I don't have any children to worry about.
I am reading "Moby Duck" by Donovan Hohn. It is a must read.
The biggest question that continually arises in my mind is how do we make the connection between ourselves and those others who are unaware or complacent? What words or actions will make those who could care and act get up and finally take a stand? Our world is filled with many problems, and many who are so encumbered with other issues cannot necessarily drop whatever else they are committed to and join this cause.
But what about those who can act but just don't care and don't want to? They could make the difference in how our planet looks in 30,40, 50 years. So what do we do? I often wish there was a pill to cure apathy. But then, would the apathetic make the effort to take it?! Dear Lord...
I guess I'll just keep doing whatever I can.
And thank you Sylvia for a passionate and timely piece. Hope you will contribute often.
Yes, haleatus11, that's an important question. Or maybe, THE question. I think we should keep asking ourselves even as we keep doing whatever we can.
I agree with both of you that it is THE question. We have to figure out how to communicate in a compelling and clear way and to provide various channels of action that allow for different levels of committment. Welcome even the small step if it goes in the right direction.
It's not just those that don't care, it's those that believe that this is part of God's plan. How do you talk to people who say that God will turn a polluted, dying earth into a paradise? For them, it is a matter of believing. If you try reasonable argument, you are faced with stubbornness and treated like a low-life atheist. I try to argue that God gave us a conscience and intelligence. Presumably, with the idea that we should use them. This also gets nowhere.
I recently watched a program on the Mayans. It appears that when they were faced with severe drought, they started sacrificing their people (including children) to the gods in order to regain their favor. We are already hearing that the problems we face are the result of what evangelicals consider immoral behavior. How much further will this go?
What does it take to get reality through to people?
Sylvia Earle is the greatest! I love this woman!!
Check out her Wish at the TED Awards:
http://www.ted.com/talks/view/lang/eng//id/467
Amazing stuff; we need more like her!
On a more somber, less gushing note: it is imperative, as Dr. Earle points out, that we establish baseline datasets - or at least what is going to have to pass for baseline datasets. We simply cannot know to where we are heading if we do not know from where we came.
Secondly, and perhaps equally as important: why is it that we pay more attention to the background of the individual vis-a-vis employment; college educations; and, government assistance, for example, but do not apply the same principle of precaution to the impacts of capitalism on our collective environment?
Bless and Protect the Oceans. Bless their crystalline structures.
I stopped hunting and spearfishing a long time ago, feeling that I was contributing to the extinction of many species whose downfall I witnessed firsthand, starting when the world was still whole. Now I even feel guilty about ordering many kinds of seafood that I occasionally eat. I hate to think of the world my children are likely inherit, thanks to our stupid science denying, superstitious, overpopulating, greedy, bestial conservative side.
I understand and agree with the evidence that shows the oceans are in trouble. But please help me understand something that doesn't make sense to me.
Sylvia says... "Some 90 per cent of many fish, large and small, have been extracted. Some face extinction owing to the ocean's most voracious predator – us."
I agree that the current mass fishing practices to get the food to the markets is predatory and unsustainable.
But then she says this... "First, only 5 per cent of the ocean has been seen, let alone mapped or explored. We know how to exploit the sea."
Isn't it contradictory to say that 90% of the fish have been extracted, but then say that we have only seen 5% of the ocean. If we haven't explored 95% of the ocean how do we know that 90% of the fish have been extracted from the ocean?
I am being earnest here when asking this question. I am not a marine biologist or any type of expert in regards to the oceans, and just want to clear up what seems to be a contradiction, in my mind. I'm assuming the reason I see this as a contradiction is because I am lacking the correct information to understand the claim Sylvia is making.
Can anybody help clear this up for me?
Thanks in advance.
Most commercial fish are caught in coastal areas or near-surface waters.
5% of the world ocean volume (average 4 km deep) would be the top 200 meters, which could be what Sylvia is claiming is the part that has been "seen," since this is also the depth of the euphotic ("sunlight") zone of the ocean.
Good question and good answer.
Brad,
Thank you for this information. I kind of figured I was missing some pertinent information to understanding Sylvia's claim :-)
Eric
I like Sylvia Earle and National Geographic. Years ago, it is there that I first got a vivid picture of the people's situation in Congo in an article about the river transport. More recently there was a good article about the auguries of sea level rise. You can learn a lot.
Two things:
1. Where there is no insight, the people perish!
2. Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad!
Yesss... the oceans are dying because there is much madness in the land. But the planet is now fighting back. Indeed! The host organism (Earth) has decided to kill us! Old Coyote Knose! Old Coyote Knose!
Ironically... Earth sends water to create radio active fire and plutonium clouds to poison the baboonies and give them cancer. Fukushima tells the tale. The flooding of the Souris river this week also tells a story of Earth pissed off! Mother Earth, now awakened to her fury, esparks massive fires and droughts... and she sends great storms to wipe out nests that the parasites have built. Massive earthquakes are also coming.
Praying to Jeeesass! and/or saluting the U.$. flag will not make things better. Quite the opposite in fact! The United $tates of Perpetual War Profiteering (and blind profligate consumption) will NOT! exist by 2050. The Amerikan dream is too toxic for life. And most other humans on this angry planet will be dead before 2100. Enough is enough! You dead! You dead! It is the legacy of creative and imaginative baboonies (humans) infected with faulty DNA... meaning they lack prescience and common sense!
Yesss... YOU DEAD!
What does anyone expect when the human race replicates as much as it does and all humans take priority; all other life's priority is rescinded.
And I bet there are those who still think the human population can go right on up to 12,000,000,000 people with no serious consequences.
The human animal's footprint and lifestyles are the problem and I don't doubt at all that earth is striking back. Now if we can only get the Long Caldera in California and the Yellowstone Caldera in Wyoming to erupt at the same time, I think Nemesis' work will do just fine for all these arrogant foolish and greedy humans.
I can't tell why my heart feels like this is fate, kismet, Karma, the empire disease, whatever. Nero fiddled, the folks went to the "games" while the empire was falling apart, their freedoms curtailed for safety and greed by the few at the expense of the many because they knew the end was near; since they had a great deal to do with the collapse. I pick on the Romans but there have been empires all over the world and all of them have fallen.It is like greed and power is the most important function of an existance here on this planet. How many empires get to destroy the world from one end to the other? That will probobly be the sum-total of the the shitty and depressing legacy of this country. Tony
The powers that be, the billionaire class, will never listen to Sylvia Earle. Shitheads never listen to intelligent people, on any subject. Does Obama care that we're killing the oceans, and thus ourselves? Does Fox News report the truth?
AMONGST my many sins, I consider myself something of an historian. As such, my reading has shown me empire after empire, ruler after ruler, who has set out upon a course of world domination, at least of the world as they have known it. Listening to the posturings of Bush and his minions, I see the same thing being repeated by the United States.
No empire has lasted forever, especially those bathed in blood. We have the ability to utterly destroy the world, but no matter how repressive Bush is against his own people, how aggressive he is against other countries, eventually he and his empire will fail. But at what cost?
---------------------------------------------
Hubris Uber Alles
Astride the known world,
Filled with hubris
They marched in their turn:
Darius, Xerxes, Agamemnon, Alexander,
Caesar, Napoleon, Hitler and more
All their empires rising, conquering,
Their passing marked by mounds of skulls
And vainglorious boasts.
Their places taken in turn by others
as their empires rotted from within.
Now yet another warlord stands,
His nation’s proud banner, once a beacon
Of freedom and hope to all mankind,
Now a symbol to be feared
By friend and foe alike.
This, too, shall pass away
After adding its quota of skulls to the mountain,
While the common man around the world
Holds tight the dream of Brotherhood and Peace
Close to his breaking heart.
Steve Osborn
9 August 2003
---------------------------------------------
The above was written while we were still being Bushwhacked. Now, in the Obamanation, the situation has continued to worsen, more wars, more giveaways, more rape of the land, more death, more poverty, more hunger, and more money to the megawealthy.
Love that piece, Steve. Thanks for sharing!
Should we not first go see what is there? No. If you see what is there the capitalist-pig-fisherman will go and destroy it all. I saw this phenomenon growing up in Africa. If you opened an area with a road the exploiters used that access to destroy everything. If you want some area or ecosystem to survive in this world leave it alone. Scientists are often the first leg of the destruction of nature because they are too stupid to see that their research will be used to exploit resources--not protect them. They need to wake up before it is too late.
Sunday Perspective:
Since Sylvia Earle has given us this article on the sea, and on life - a few thoughts on life:
At Stephen Jay Gould's "left wall of complexity" stand the domains Bacteria and Archaea. To summarize Stephen's classic "The Evolution of Life on Earth" (Scientific American October 1994),
'first there was the modal bacter, and ever after'
The rest, the Eukarya, are symbionts - the icing on the cake.
All plants and animals are powered by ATP (adenosine tri-phosphate) from, respectively, chloroplasts and mitochondria, once free-living members of the "modal bacter," all of whom once made their living in the world ocean - the 'Blue World' of which Sylvia writes.
The 'modal bacter' has always been the dominant lifeform on Earth, and has done nothing over the last four billion years but increase their dominion on this planet. The Eukarya can profitably be thought of as elaborate symbiotic forms for the ubiquitous 'modal bacter', which fill new niches made available by the molecule Oxygen, whose presence in our present atmosphere was initiated and is even now largely maintained by oceanic phyto-plankton.
To put it another way, humans talking about being in charge is similar to the old saw of the fleas on the elephant arguing over whose elephant is whose!
Scientists study the natural world, as did all of us in times past. But scientists today spend lots of time obtaining funding, or getting articles published, or in peer-review, or at conferences all over the world, or furthering their careers, raising their families, and on and on.
Perhaps, in considering why we continue on the road to Armageddon, despite all this talent and knowledge and technology - perhaps we might stop, for even a millisecond, if that is possible in this self-absorbed world, and listen to the words of a man who, like Sylvia Earle, was both a formidable physical explorer and a superb scientist - Fridtjof Nansen:
"Deliverance will not come from the rushing, noisy centers of civilization, it will come from the lonely places."
Sylvia Earle has been to these lonely places innumerable times, and I think this is partly why her voice is so fine -
Manysummits
Calgary, Alberta
====
How about 'peak' life? Because this is where we are headed.
Ya Know, There really doesn't have to be suffering from a collaspe, or at least not that terrible.... Because, if the rich, or anyone who could share, be it money, or food, or tools or housing.... and I just don't mean here in the US... Every one would help each other, sharing what they have and spreading their wealth. That way, we could really "bail ourselves out" and the human race could start over..... stop burning fossil fuels, etc.... communal sharing, which is what really has kept the human race alive.... up until the last few hundred years or so....
Wait, don't say it, I know I'm dreaming.....