EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
- Victory in Seattle as Teachers Win Battle in Standardized Test Boycott
Popular content
Today's Top News
European Authorities Risking Financial Contagion in Greek Showdown; Where Is the U.S. Government?
The US had better be ready for the economic shock
The European authorities are playing a dangerous game of "chicken" with Greece right now. It is overdue for US members of Congress to exercise some oversight as to what our government's role is in this process, and how we might be preparing for a Greek debt default. Depending on how it happens, this default could have serious repercussions for the international financial system, the US economy and, indeed, the world economy.
The US government has a direct and significant role in the Greek crisis because the US treasury department has the predominant voice in the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF, together with the European Commission and the European Central Bank (ECB) – the three are commonly referred to as "the Troika" – are negotiating a new austerity package with the Greek government, in return for a new bailout deal. This package promises more suffering for the Greek people – that is acknowledged by all sides. But the Troika thinks it can ram the programme through the Greek parliament on Tuesday, with the threat that the IMF will not disburse the next $17bn instalment of Greece's current loan package – thus putting Greece in a situation of sudden default.
The Troika won the first round of its battle against the Greek citizenry, with a parliamentary vote of confidence last Tuesday; and if the ruling party's slim majority holds up this coming Tuesday, they will have a slim majority again in favour of the austerity package. But it is a high stakes gamble, and this week's vote won't end the instability.
It has been largely forgotten, but there was a Greek debt crisis just over a year ago, in May 2010, that rattled world financial markets. It was exacerbated by the extremism of the European Central Bank, which was also playing a game of brinksmanship back then. On 6 May 2010, the ECB refused to commit to buying European government bonds in the midst of the crisis. The idea was that this would be a form of "monetising" the debt of the weaker eurozone countries, just as the US federal reserve has monetised some $2tn of US government debt (through quantitative easing) in the last few years. This was anathema to the ECB, which is considerably to the right of the Fed. But after a harsh negative reaction in world markets, including a plunging US stock market, the ECB reversed its position four days later and began buying European government and private debt.
Perhaps the European authorities believe they have the tools to stem any panic that may occur this time in response to a Greek default. And as happened last year, they can count on the federal reserve to open a swap line of dollars as necessary. But it is worth noting how much the European debt situation has deteriorated since over the last year.
At the peak of last year's crisis, interest rates on the 10-year government bonds of Greece, Portugal, and Ireland were 12.4%, 6.3% and 5.9% respectively. They are currently at 16.8%, 11.4% and 11.9%. Credit default swaps for these three countries – a measure of the risk of default – peaked respectively at 891, 460 and 273 basis points in the May 2010 crisis; they are currently at 1,977, 827 and 799 points.
Clearly, the risk of contagion from the Greek crisis has risen significantly since last year. At the time, a number of economists (including myself) noted that the pro-cyclical policies imposed by the Troika would only worsen the Greek economy and its debt situation. This has evidently come to pass, as the economy shrank by 4.5% last year, unemployment continued soaring to more than 16%, and public opinion in Greece turned sharply against the austerity measures.
A "voluntary" rollover by some of the bondholders, as currently proposed, will not resolve the problem. And there is only so much punishment that the Greek population (or the Spanish population, which has recently seen hundreds of thousands of protesters in the streets in the face of 21% unemployment) will take. The Greek government has already laid off 10% of its government workers, and the plan that they will vote on this Tuesday calls for layoffs of another 20%. It also provides for a total of 12% of GDP of fiscal tightening for 2011-2015 – a recipe for never-ending recession, for the purpose of trying to pay off an unpayable debt to bankers and bondholders.
A Greek debt default appears inevitable, and the potential for financial contagion is significant. What is the US government doing to avoid a financial crisis, and to prepare for the various contingencies that may be anticipated? One would think that, after living through the events that followed the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008, some responsible government officials in the United States would be asking these questions.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


41 Comments so far
Show Allwe need to put a real sharp end to the whole bankster terrorist cult of death that has been running the world through a fiat money system for hundreds of years
over the last couple of years they have stepped up their ponzy scheme to a galactical level and they truly are aiming to enslave the entire planet in their toxic debt scam
the bailout so far has cost american taxpayers in excess of 23 trillion dollars
the credit default swaps, unregulated and kept in secret by the banks has been estimated to be several quadrillion dollars
led by goldman sachs who have the revolving door from their boardroom to the whitehouse
matt taibbi has done some great work in this area - read these if you haven't already
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-people-vs-goldman-sachs-20110511
http://www.businessinsider.com/goldman-sachs-lied-2011-5
now that greece has signed off on the latest bailout they have sold their water rights, their highway system, their train system, pensions, lotteries, electrical grid - in short - their entire country has been given away at a penny on the dollar
here are some talks about this by max keiser
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSwWy4E6I04
from his website
http://maxkeiser.com/
wake up folks - the same shit is happening here
Who are the "responsible US govenrmnet officials" that Weisbrot refers to in the final paragraph ?
Perhaps he does not know. Perhaps he is hoping that some government officials are responsible enough to do something appropriate.
there are none - that's his point
The bailouts in large part are paying off the derivitives based on defaulting real estate mortgages - derivitives that are Leveraged 50 and 100 to $1 in mortgages. Obviously, instead of paying off the 100 to 1 derivitive why not pay off the 1 in mortgages instead of the $100 leveraged cdo's?
The entire residential mortgage market in the usa is around 12 trillion - we've already bailed out the banksters for over 20 trillion and it's barely made a dent in the foreclosure debacle.
We could have issued a JUBILEE for the entire mortgage market tor less than we've already given the vampire banksters-
If we would have done that the economy would be booming, the banks derivitives would be profitable and the real estate market would equalize.
The usa did None of that because the foreclosures and bailouts Are the PLAN.
Don't kid yourself - none of these Austerity measures are about fiscal responsibility - they are simply the obviously ongoing efforts to continue the greatest Heist in the history of the world.
GIABO! And bring back the gullitine are the only real answers - and will not hsppen until the next crash - and w the dem obomber at the helm i think we'll end up electing a rightwingnut -
God help us.
Fiat money has been around for hundreds of years? Not exactly, though it was tried for a time in the American colonies, during the Civil War, and by communities in the Great Depression. Bankers preferred the gold standard for a good part of the nineteenth century, something that wasn't that great for ordinary people--remember Bryan's Cross of Gold speech?
The world runs by credit/debt and that is not such a bad thing. It is what money is borrowed FOR that is important and the interest demanded. Credit at near zero interest rates is not offered for public projects, student tuition, or any other enterprise that benefits the people. That is the problem--not the use of credit in general.
23 trillion? Where did that come from? Are you referring to loans that were backed up by the Fed?
Who estimated the cdo's at quadrillions of dollars? What was the basis of that prediction? I wouldn't take this stuff seriously unless I knew more.
Both the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times of London last week
in articles about the banksters successfully putting off even the flimsy regulation of
the Dodd-Frank Bill for 6 months said there was $600 Trillion still sloshing around in
the still existing derivatives market!
The trillions of dollars are the true cost of the QE money printing operations by the
Fed and cutting interest rates to banksters to practically 0%
The TARP bailout was nothing compared to banksters ponying up to the Fed to
get money for nothing while simultaneously unloading their underwater mortgage loans
to Freddie Mac ...
And remember that as the banks got those almost zero interest loans from the Fed, they then just loaned those funds to the federal government. They've received interest payments on the government securities that were up to 12 times greater than the Fed's rates, per the CRS analysis reported for Bernie Sanders.
I suspect nobody really knows how much cdo's are worth. The Fed bought a lot of them, most of them not worth the paper they are printed on (if they are printed on paper at all). I don't know what you mean by the "true cost" of QE being in the trillions of dollars. I thought 600 billion was the amount Bernanke set upon. Some of it was used to buy "toxic assets" of banks. Those assets are not worth nothing, though certainly they are worth a fraction of their original value.
I'm not defending what the six big banks of the Fed are doing. I am only questioning estimates in the "trillions" and "quadrillions"--whenever you get those sorts of numbers with all those zeros, you suspect that somebody just pulled them out of the air.
QE was around 600 Billion.
The outstanding values of the derivitives that are out there floating around is well over 600 trillion. And the entire World GDP is less than 60 trillion a year - so the banksters Already Stole over 10 years of World Economic Activity!
Prepare NOW for another crash.
In the Old Testament Israel realized the untenable nation over the long term of compound interest and therefore every 40 years had a Jubilee where all debts of Israelis to Israelis were forgiven. Gentiles were left out of this deal. That said we need a Jubilee for all debtors and get back to business. If not this will drag on and on and may even result in war if we continue on this path. You can't starve a nation and people into prosperity and debts will not ever be paid back from a starving and destitute people. They will fight back before they allow themselves to starve while their nation is stripped of its' wealth.
Universal Jubilee is called for now, yes! The "small" creditors -- like pension funds for everyday workers -- will also need help when this happens, or at least their "little guy" beneficiaries will need it.
The Israeli Jubilee of old was every 50 years, and was supposed to be for everyone, no exclusions. It appears to have rarely been carried out, at least according to the writings around the time Jerusalem was sacked. The more limited debt forgiveness for Israelis only was more frequent, every 7 years. It also appears to have been frequently ignored. The creditors didn't want debt forgiveness then, just as they resist it now. In the end, their nation fell. Resistance to debt forgiveness played a major role ...
Wouldn't massive inflation accomplish debt forgiveness. If I have a pocket full of million dollar bills couldn't I pay off my mortage and all of my credit cards?
Hyperinflation can produce debt elimination. So can bankruptcy. Not all debt forgiveness is hyperinflation. Hyperinflation is just one technique that has been used deliberately to reduce debt. The way things are going, massive bankruptcy or debt writedown is more likely now.
Would massive bankruptcy or writedown be followed by inflation? Not necessarily ...
No because your debt would inflate at the same rate. It's a win/win game for the bankers.
which is exactly why germany ended up in the hands of the nazis after WW1 and then went to war..because there was no way they could make reparations without starving their people to death...we got smarter after WW2 and didn't pull that kind of stuff..i guess because somebody had a better idea that in the long run they could make more money by stealing from all the taxpayers in the world by creating phony debt instruments and selling them on and on and on + the casino which is wall street was allowed to bambozzle regulatory authorities in such a way that taxpayers were bound to be left holding the bag rather than the people who made the bad bets knowing they were bad, but also knowing that they owned the government which would enforce their extortion
The world needs a consensus that at some point, the world's poor are not responsible for the debts that their owners rack up, and that in no case are the world's poor are going to pay the creditors off. This would mean that no one would give massive loans to the crooks.
In many countries, this means that the crooks couldn't afford the massive security apparatus required to oppress the poor. If Wall Street can't expect a consistent profit they won't lend to tinhorns.
The austerity measures being demanded by the IMF leading to layoffs which lead to less spending which leads to greater deficits is a down hill spiral that will catapault the world towards war. We've seen this movie before and we know how it ends.
Odious debt - from Wikipedia:
"The lenders have committed a hostile act against the people, they cannot expect a nation which has freed itself of a despotic regime to assume these odious debts, which are the personal debts of the ruler.[1]"
==========
This suggests that the Greek electorate must first cast off their elected government, and replace it with a government both willing and capable of challenging The Western Way, i.e., Naomi Klein's "Disaster Capitalism."
In what very much resembles a fractal geo-political world, if the Greek people could pull this off, might that not be a model for the rest of us?
Or are we in a Catch-22 here?
Representative democracies turn out to be no such thing. They 'appear to be', but are not.
Again I am reminded of the US constitutional lawyer and individual anarchist Lysander Spooner:
1) The 'Trial by Jury" was meant to be the major check on a representative democracy, but does not exist as envisaged, and is all but powerless to fulfill this function, i.e., a check on the power of the government.
2) The US Constitution is not a valid contract - never was; isn't now.
3) Natural Justice is the way forward; direct democracy/inclusive democracy...
=========
I have only the hope that the manifest and increasing trials and tribulations of the current era will generate sufficient energy to transform our world.
Manysummits
====
So how is it possible the entire world is in debt for eons and all of this is owed to the top 1% that run and own everything. Seems a whole bunch like slavery. They even slap an IOU on every newborn, so they'll never get out of debt.
Don't know enough about Europe, but in the USA it started with Alexander Hamilton, first Sec of the Treasury. He represented the bankers who thought it would be good if the new country had debt so that bankers could lend the money and thus have a steady, reliable income stream.
PS--Hamilton is the hero of those in the Federalist Society--people like Roberts, Alito, Scalia, Thomas.
Now more than ever:
https://votep2.us/login.php
Direct democracy
"The European authorities are playing a dangerous game of "chicken" with Greece right now. It is overdue for US members of Congress to exercise some oversight as to what our government's role is in this process, and how we might be preparing for a Greek debt default. Depending on how it happens, this default could have serious repercussions for the international financial system, the US economy and, indeed, the world economy."
Excuse me did the US government loan money to Greece? I think the US government has done enough with bailing out wealthy banking interests, that made bets they couldn't cover in the earlier crash. What banking interests need more money...or is it muscle they need to force a sovereign nation to sell off it's resources for pennies to their interests? Greece would be smarter if they pulled an "Iceland" and defaulted.
I think Ireland should follow the same model. It's what the "Donald" would do. bankruptcy and default works for the wealthy few, why not for nations that were suckered the same way?
I think it's about time the international financial system and the US economy went through a huge reform or overhaul, like our lives have. There's a huge systemic cancer eating the rest of us alive. I think it's time for a heavy does of economic/chemo therapy designed to kill it. At the very least a vaccine designed to control it's growth and stem it's long term effects and symptoms on our lives while it thrives on canabalizing the rest of us.
If Greece defaults, no one will loan them money for any purpose. Since they are stuck with the Euro (and do not have their own currency), that will be a disaster. If they default, they should establish their own currency as quickly as possible. Within the country they could use it for exchange, though they could not buy goods from outside with it since it would have little value on international markets. It could pay for goods with dollars or euros it earns from exports, but it exports very little. Tourists will bring in some outside money, too. I think default might be the best choice, but it will take time to transition out of the Common Market. If Ireland, Portugal, and Spain all defaulted, perhaps a tiny segment of the "have-not" countries could continue.
The elected representatives no longer work for us. What's happening in Greece, Spain and Ireland will soon be coming to a town near you. The US started the disaster by bailing out the banks and huge corporations (e.g. GE, Goldman Sachs). CDers are better informed than most others. We need to spread the word to all about the impending (additional) giveaways to the banks and big corporations. To reclaim our democracy we have to work to amend the constitution to clearly define that corporations are not people and money is not free speech. It's going to take a lot of work. Every little bit we do to rally for this cause will show the powers that be that we mean business!.
Economic shock??? Really you think the rest of us haven't been impacted already?
What you think we'll be happy selling used t-shirts like Zambia? You privatize our resources and infrastructure, you sell off our industry and what exactly are you promising in return? That the rich won't have to pay for their mistakes?
Not buying into it. I am not even sure Bernanke could get reconfirmed on threats like that today. You can only cry "wolf" so many times before you need to provide the carcass of the wolf first. We're at a point where we are eating our young in order to perserve the lives of the wealthy. It's about time we saw them partake of the austerity. A gastric bypass on our lives isn't going to impact their fat.
How much do you think we will get for Yosemite and the Grand Canyon?
The writer had memory loss...Wall Street (read Goldman Sachs) orchestrated the Greek crisis
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=asBNXSLtlN9E
Goldman Sachs, Greece Didn’t Disclose Swap Contract
By Elisa Martinuzzi -
Feb. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Goldman Sachs Group Inc. managed $15 billion of bond sales for Greece after arranging a currency swap that allowed the government to hide the extent of its deficit.
No mention was made of the swap in sales documents for the securities in at least six of the 10 sales the bank arranged for Greece since the transaction, according to a review of the prospectuses by Bloomberg. The New York-based firm helped Greece raise $1 billion of off-balance-sheet funding in 2002 through the swap, which European Union regulators said they knew nothing about until recent days.
Failing to disclose the swap may have allowed Goldman, a co-lead manager on many of the sales, other underwriters and Greece to get a better price for the securities, said Bill Blain, co-head of fixed income at Matrix Corporate Capital LLP, a London-based broker and fund manager.
“The price of bonds should reflect the reality of Greece’s finances,” Blain said. “If a bank was selling them to investors on the basis of publicly available information, and they were aware that information was incorrect, then investors have been fooled.”
Michael DuVally, a spokesman at Goldman Sachs in New York, declined to comment.
Legal ‘At the Time’
Goldman Sachs, Wall Street’s most profitable securities firm, is being criticized by European politicians including Germany’s ruling Christian Democrats, who have questioned whether the firm helped Greece hide its deficit to comply with the currency’s membership criteria. Greece is also being faulted by fellow euro-region countries for failing to disclose the swaps to EU regulators.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel said today it’s a “scandal” if banks are found to have helped Greece conceal its budget deficit. The country “falsified statistics for years,” she said in her speech to a party rally.
The swaps used by Greece to manage debt were “at the time legal,” Greek Finance Minister George Papaconstantinou said on Feb. 15. The government doesn’t use the swaps now, he said.
Eurostat, the EU’s statistics office, this week ordered Greece to hand over information on the swaps transactions by the end of this week in an investigation that may extend to other EU countries.
Goldman Sachs earned about $24 million underwriting Greek government bonds since 2002, data compiled by Bloomberg show. Goldman Sachs underwrote 10 bond sales. Prospectuses for six of them, obtained by Bloomberg, contain no mention of the swaps. The other four couldn’t be obtained.
‘Fear the Worst’
Freshfields was the legal adviser to the managers of the six bond sales. Spokesman Christian Marroni didn’t have an immediate comment.
The yield on Greek 10-year government bonds jumped to as much as 7.2 percent on Jan. 28 amid the worst crisis in the euro’s 11-year history. The premium, or spread, investors demand to hold Greek 10-year notes instead of German bunds, Europe’s benchmark government securities, widened yesterday by 18 basis points to 323 basis points.
The spread reached 396 basis points last month, the most since the year before the euro’s debut in 1999, compared with an average of 57 basis points in the past decade. A basis point is 0.01 percentage point.
“When people start to fear that the numbers aren’t accurate, they fear the worst,” said Simon Johnson, a former International Monetary Fund chief economist who is now a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Sloan School of Management in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
No ‘Smoking Gun’
Goldman could face legal liability “if it could be established that they were knowingly hiding risk, and therefore knew or had reason to know that the bond disclosure documents were misleading,” said Thomas Hazen, a law professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. “But that would be a tough hill to climb, in terms of burden of proof. There’d have to be some sort of smoking-gun memo.”
The swap enabled Greece to improve its budget and deficit and meet a target needed to remain within the region’s single currency. Knowledge of their existence may have changed investors’ perception of the risk associated with Greece, and the price they may have been willing to pay for the country’s securities.
“From what we know, this is an egregious example of a conflict of interest” for Goldman Sachs, MIT’s Johnson said. “Even if the deal had been authorized, it doesn’t let them off the hook.”
‘Long-Term Damage’
A Greek government inquiry this month identified a series of swaps agreements with securities firms that allowed the country to hide its mounting deficit. Greece used the swaps to defer interest payments, causing “long-term damage” to the Greek state, according to the Feb. 1 document, commissioned by the Finance Ministry.
European Union officials said this week they only recently became aware of the transaction with Goldman. The swaps don’t necessarily break EU rules, European Commission spokesman Amadeu Altafaj told reporters in Brussels on Feb. 15.
The transaction with Goldman consisted of a cross-currency swap of about $10 billion of debt issued by Greece in dollars and yen, according to Christoforos Sardelis, head of Greece’s Public Debt Management Agency at the time.
That was swapped into euros using a historical exchange rate, a mechanism that implied a reduction in debt and generated about $1 billion in an up-front payment from Goldman to Greece, Sardelis said. He declined to give specifics on how the swap affected the country’s deficit or debt.
‘Wider Collusion’
European politicians such as Luxembourg Treasury Minister Jean-Claude Juncker this week criticized Goldman Sachs for arranging the Greek swap and are pressing the firm and Greece for more disclosure. Merkel’s Christian Democrats aim to push for new rules that will force euro-region nations and banks to disclose bond swaps that have an impact on public finances, financial affairs spokesman Michael Meister said.
“Investment banks are guilty of being part of a wider collusion that fudged the numbers to make the euro look like a working currency union,” said Matrix’s Blain. “The bottom line is foreign exchange and bond investors bought something sellers knew not to be the case.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Elisa Martinuzzi in Milan at emartinuzzi@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Edward Evans at eevans3@bloomberg.net
GS did orchestrate this crisis through off-b/s acccounting. And they are STILL orchestrating this crisis as continued underwriters of the credit ratings agencies that rate Greek debt, whereby assessing the "risk" in the world markets.
Remember: GS made $ on the way up & on the way down, across world markets, during '08 crisis. They planned it. They are planning the same scenario now in Greece, Ireland, Spain, Portugal, and eventually the rest of us...once again. There is a massive collusion of theft of sovereign wealth going on. Any underrepresentation in the media of this fact is profoundly disturbing.
Yes, and guess who has been appointed the next president of the ECB to replace Trichet, and Ex Goldman Sachs executive, Mario Draghi. We are thick in thieves and shysters one washing the others hands.
Mario Draghi appointed European Central Bank president
EU leaders appointed Italy's Mario Draghi as the next president of the European Central Bank on Friday and another Italian on the ECB's executive board agreed to step down to smooth the process, EU sources said.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/8596645/Mario-Draghi-appointed-European-Central-Bank-president.html
...there were concerns earlier in the process that his nationality and past employment with Goldman Sachs could hinder his pathway to Europe's top central banking job.
In appearances before the European Parliament's finance committee, Draghi has made clear that his role at Goldman Sachs between 2002 and 2005 did not involve selling financial instruments but was largely an advisory position. .....
Er, that would be expecting the original criminals to fix the situation? Wha???
The Greek government will cave and Civil War will ensue, ensuring default anyway. Unlike Weisbrot, Hudson is on top of the story, http://michael-hudson.com/2011/06/whither-greece/
"...Where is the US government?"
Why they're right in the thick of it, manipulating things so as to (they hope) work out just the way they want it to. You see, they just can not tolerate the euro- or any other "currency"- replacing their dollar as the reserve currency. And so, no matter how many innocent lives are destroyed or malaffected, that is where the US government is.
I hope the Greeks do default on their loans. It's the only way that those in the EU who assisted this calamity will ever suffer the justice that they so emphatically deserve.
Then I hope it spreads to the U.S. where a financial collapse will be suffered by those that caused this calamity in the first place.
Then and only then will people finally realize what they always suspected; that Capitalism serves only the wealthy and the rest of humanity must suffer (and face extinction) because of a minority of psychopaths that have instant access to money and ready made laws. Fascism by definition.
Greece needs to do as Iceland did, and tell the banksters to shove it.
The fight for Europe’s future is being waged in Athens and other Greek cities to resist financial demands that are the 21st century’s version of an outright military attack.
This is class war! Make no mistake! And it is coming to the US in exactly the same way.
The elites have had it with democracy, and are out to put an end to it once and for all.
Their weapon of choice is: "financial austerity."
"At the time, a number of economists (including myself) noted that the pro-cyclical policies imposed by the Troika would only worsen the Greek economy and its debt situation."
It seems to me our analysts overthink the issue. Why not just say:
"This is bullsh*t. No one owes you one red cent. In fact, it's time to look into how you came to possess so much wealth."
The absurdity of anyone owing anything to these ridiculously wealthy vultures who have stolen, through bribes and blackmail, so much already. The absurdity of pontificating:
"A Greek debt default appears inevitable, and the potential for financial contagion is significant.."
Financial contagion?! There would be no "financial contagion" if the people in power would wield their power and investigate, prosecute, and imprison, because if these guys are sent to prison, they cannot profit from their crimes, and so the world could recoup its stolen losses.
Phrases like "financial contagion" and "serious repercussions" only work for so long, as the picture becomes more and more clear: somehow the politicians--through cowardice, hubris, and greed--have arranged it so that we owe the 1% even more. Time's coming--and soon--when such words and phrases will elicit anger rather than fear.
++lefttown++
i really hope you're correct about "time's coming and soon"....i don't have much time left and would dearly love to see all of this blow up in the b*******s faces
There will come a time when people can't take anymore. I don't believe the left will lead it; they seem focus on every small celebrity politician and unimportant event the corporate press wishes to throw out there. They discuss it to death and end up where they started. The majority of left is unable to break out of their left/right mindset and are unwilling to accept the flaws in other groups. I think a right/Libertarian coalition will start the revolution, and then the left, with its considerable skills, will join. There are many "respectable" Democratic gatekeeper blogs who will try to keep the people who are loyal to them at bay, but at some point all of us will have to fight (hopefully, with civil disobedience) for ourselves and our loved ones. We won't have a choice, because our corporate government intends to take everything we need to live away from us. So time's coming, because there will be no other option.Just my opinion, but I think it will shake out that way.
'bribes and blackmail'
Don't forget Outright Fraud!
How conveniently Mr. Weisbrot is forgetting (does he?) that it was Goldman Sachs who, since 2001, had been 'advising' the Greek government to go into debt more and more. Greece: 0 - GS: 1. And have we already forgotten that it was Wall Street who, in 2007/08, almost took the entire world down the financial toilet. And now this same bunch of shysters is worried about the 'financial well-being of the US" should Greece default? Or is it rather being worried about their own 'well-being'? One leads by example, not by threats and blackmail. It would be totally refreshing if the US would mind it's own gd business.