EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- 'Tip of the Iceberg': Senators Warn Far More Data May Not Be Safe
- Playing the Obama Bumper Sticker Game
- Intentional and Evil: Court Marshall Sexually Assaults Woman, Then Arrests Her When She Protests
- David Brooks, Tom Friedman, Bill Keller Wish Snowden Had Just Followed Orders
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
- The Terror Con
- Pentagon Bracing for Public Dissent Over Climate and Energy Shocks
- Bank of America Lied to Homeowners and Rewarded Foreclosures, Former Employees Say
Popular content
Today's Top News
My Fellow Republicans Have Trampled Our Principles
Make no mistake this is not about “liberals vs. conservatives,” or Republicans vs. Democrats, It’s about what is right, and what is wrong. The legislation and policies of Gov. Rick Scott and legislative leadership are wrong.
It’s about shouting a warning to Floridians that their elected leaders are selling them down the river, saying one thing, but doing another.
In 16 years in the Florida House, Senate and Public Service Commission, I have tried to inform people about what was going on in their government and provided the inside scoop that political leaders did not want you to know about. I have been warning for years and providing examples of our representative government/democracy being sold to the highest contributors, the slush funds and the corruption. That it really is about money.
I have been a Republican and believe in the Republican principles of long ago: Less government in my private life; not taxing us to death; protecting personal freedom; personal responsibility; the right to protect myself and family; and for allowing business to do what it does best — do business without excessive or unnecessary regulations. But, and contrary to the current crop of Republican leaders, I do not want Halliburton in charge of the Pentagon, BP heading up the Department of Environmental Protection or Enron making energy policy.
In recent years I have seen exactly the opposite of that philosophy and I have seen much corruption, so much so that a grand jury ranked Florida No. 1 in corruption.
I have a problem with those who have hijacked the Republican Party to use it for their own selfish gain, who wouldn’t have a clue what an Republican platform is and who have mutated the “R” philosophy beyond recognition. I take offense that they use the hard-working grassroots level Republicans to help promote a philosophy that they do not practice. Many good Republicans who worked hard for this party have written books telling us what was happening, apparently to no avail. It cannot be that all that matters is that our side wins at any cost. I refuse to believe anyone could not see the harm in doing that.
Seems that anytime an elected Republican official would not go along with the crooks who stole the party, they were labeled as “Republicans In Name Only (RINOs), and that tactic worked for awhile. This has brought the R party to the sad place where I see it is now, fractured.
As a Republican I cannot be proud of the state party chairman being carted off in handcuffs and accused of stealing contributions. I cannot be proud of or defend R leaders abusing the party credit cards for things like lingerie for girlfriends, home repairs, trips to Las Vegas and more.
I will not defend the Republican Senate President who stridently squawks for smaller government yet has taken three government salaries, tax paid, ostensibly as a professor, not to teach, but to take three years to write a book on politics, achieving a kindergarten level of literacy of which the college only had one single copy of. I have sat next to this legislator in committees when serious discussion was taking place only to watch him write greeting and birthday cards to his constituents for political purposes, totally oblivious of the discussions going on. For years legislative leaders obtained for certain legislators these extra “jobs” in return for a “do everything you’re told” legislator. Pretty hard for those legislators to object when they have gotten used to the trough, even when it hurts the very people who have voted for them.
I cannot be proud of legislation proposed and passed this session that strips away minimum protections for our elderly in taxpayer subsidized for-profit nursing homes, legislation that turns them into fodder for overpaid executives and coupon-clipping shareholders. One of my biggest battles in the Legislature as chair of the House Elder Affairs and Long-Term Care Committee was to bring nursing-home quality of care standards merely up to the federal minimum safety levels. I recall an influential owner of a large nursing-home chain telling me he could not provide those minimum standards and also provide the money his shareholders and executives demanded.
I am not proud of the firing of the state’s long-term-care ombudsman, who was doing a great job and was supported by nursing-home residents’ family members. I am not proud of the reduced funding for Medicaid supported poor elderly while reducing the minimum required staffing levels I fought so hard to get into law — all this while further curbs on civil litigation to redress nursing-home horrors passed.
The attempt to privatize everything government does is alive and well, under the premise of “efficiency” and while some privatization works well, not all does. After all, the mission of government, contrary to the booming proclamations of self-absorbed politicians, is, among other notable goals, to promote the general welfare and secure the blessings of liberty, not to grease the avenues of profit for significant campaign contributors. Privatization makes for more, and larger, sources of contributions.
As chair of the Senate Governmental Operations Committee, I saw firsthand how taxpayers got ripped off by some of the major privatized contracts. My committee had to fix the huge errors in contracts and found that they came at a very high cost to the taxpayer. Although a company bid low and won the contract, embedded in many contracts were automatic increases that, most times, had us paying a much higher price for the service than when provided by the state, and the most elementary protections one would expect to find in contracts were removed.
I am yet more ashamed of the massive deregulation bills that passed this session. Attacks on water laws, the environment and the all-out “build it wherever and however you want it” approach to growth.
For the last 16 years, the Republican majority deregulated where it was called for, removing unnecessary, duplicative measures. The recent bills are simply giveaways and will cause great harm.
I cannot be proud of the attacks on our teachers and state workers, firefighters, police the environment and even election laws. I had in my Senate district a state firefighter whose salary was such that he qualified for food stamps when his wife was expecting a second child. To legislators who fashioned bills for drug testing state workers, here’s an idea: Eliminate the exceptions for executive and legislative staff, and members of the House and Senate.
I am ashamed of the relentless intrusion into personal decisions in people’s personal lives, despite Republican leadership’s mantra that government be minimal. I’m not proud that millions were hidden in the 2006 budget to get an airport hangar that a big contributor and friend of the Republican House speaker wanted. I am incensed that a Jeb Bush appointee, who managed to squander tax dollars in outfitting the Taj Mahal courthouse with the mahogany furniture, flat screen TVs and expensive artwork, while we are laying off people and cutting essential services, has managed to be charged with abusing his authority as a judge by the Judicial Qualifications Commission.
There are attacks on citizen’s ballot initiatives, only to find that the biggest abusers of the constitutional amendment process are the legislators themselves, and for political purposes.
They are even fighting the majority of citizens (63 percent) who voted for a ballot initiative for fair districts with our own tax. I cannot be proud to find that the Florida Speaker has hired his own law firm to litigate the Fair Districts amendment challenges.
For a party ostensibly consumed by economic efficiency, the CSX sweetheart deal, which costs us millions and puts operational liability on tax payers, is inexplicable, except to the extent that its been reported a key legislator has property that will benefit from the deal..
You all know what the legislative leaders did to PSC commissioners who said no to unjustified electric-rate increases. The PSC is a legislative agency that does what the Legislature wants it to do. Legislative leaders don’t want a fair PSC, they want a kept whore. Legislative leaders take millions from those the PSC regulates.
Do you really think you are getting a fair shake? This agency will continue to be a waste of tax dollars until it is removed from the Legislature’s control.
The usurpation of PSC responsibilities by the Legislature is reflected by the amendment sneaked into the energy bill that passed in 2006 by the soon to be senate president. When the bill came to the floor it was never mentioned — as used to be the custom — that substantial and major policy changes had been introduced, and we all voted for it. Republican leadership put one over on us at the behest of the utility lobby. Now with nuclear under the gun, the ratepayers will pick up every dollar of the estimated half-billion-dollar cost already incurred after various nuclear projects are abandoned.
Today’s Republican leaders demand a beehive mentality even as they stray further from real Republican principles. There are “boys” with little life experience running the four-largest state. While I have no doubt that the Democratic Party has its problems, I speak as a Republican who has been on the inside for a long time.
I believe that the millions of dollars from the mega-corporations that the Republican Party hijackers get in their sweet-sounding slush funds, with names something like the “Committee to Create a Beautiful World,” are given with the purpose of pushing the corporate hegemony, which is advancing rapidly throughout the country. While I am not anti-corporation, I certainly do not want my country run by them. I see the same legislation in many states. My son and many of your sons and daughters are not serving this country in our military to hand our democracy over to mega-corporations. Veterans should be outraged.
No one, no matter the party affiliation, can want an elected official who just follows. Why have separate districts? Not many of us get to vote for the leaders of any party, just for those who run from our own districts. We should expect that they remember where they came from and vote for the interests of their districts as well as the Constitution they swore to uphold.
I have been asked by many people to run for elected office again, to stay involved. I have a fire in my gut more than ever to stop the selling of our representative government; to stop the corruption and the hypocrisy; to work toward fixing the real problems we are all facing. I cannot and will not sit and do nothing.
If belonging to a political party means having to follow blindly, count me out. We need more citizen legislators with the courage to fly alone if the team goes in the wrong direction. Both political parties need a reawakening. In these dire times, partisan politics is the last thing we need.
I put a lot on the line to advise you that the proposals by young inexperienced legislative power mongers and Gov. Scott were going to do harm to the very people I worked hard to protect.
Those agendas have become policy of the state. We have to fight hard to get our democracy back. Our rights and our government are worth that fight. The time is now.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...




57 Comments so far
Show Allyou reap what you sow, nancy. good luck stuffing that genie back into the bottle.
This is a wonderful article by someone who has been resistant to the takeover of her party by the Rs. Now she has courageously spoken truth to the power of the Rs who have taken over the Republican Party.
With this article "nancy (sic)" will reap the displeasure of the Rs.
It's 2011. She's just now noticing? I think someone named Nancy is dabbling in polling numbers for this position, because everything she's griping about has been a thirty year GOP project.
Absolutely. Why is CommonDreams posting this poseur garbage?
"You cannot return to the past..."
Good advice for the Rs who want to return to feudalism. To stop the return to feudalism we need to speak truth to power. Thank you, Miami Herald and Common Dreams, for publishing this article.
"I have been a Republican and believe in the Republican principles of long ago..."
That short list she ennumerates is a myth. Since the 1880s, Big Business has always run the federal government through the Republican Party, and made its goals synchronous. The evidence proving so is quite impressive: Smedley Butler's "War is a Racket," and Gabriel Kolko's "Triumph of Conservatism" are just the starting points for learning that history--a history the author seemingly has never read or heard of given her statements. What is different today isn't the level of corruption within the federal government; it's the fact that both major parties now compete to see who can best serve the Money Power and its subsidiary Big Business. Perhaps you ought to call the GOP the Gangster Operated Party to drive your point home--especially in Florida where the biggest, baddest Gangsters have always resided and/or vacationed.
I like the Ron Paul Republicans, not the other kind.
"KeLeMi"
Ron Paul and the "libertarians" would remove ALL social safeguards. Their dream world is one of total irresponsibility and indifference to injustice. What we are witnessing today in corruption and indifference would only increase faster if Ron Paul had his way.
To libertarians, slavery would be okay because money, guns, and no regulations are their sacred trinity.
You are confusing anarcho-capitalist ( corporate) style libertarians with more non statist, non hierarchical, libertarians. There is a large spectrum of libertarian thinking and the word has been hijacked by Chicago style economic thinking. Ron Paul has said he would focus primarily on ending the wars, drastically cut military spending, close all foreign bases, and end corporate welfare. If he could pull that off,( he probably can't because the powers are too entrenched), it would be huge, would it not?
It doesn't take that long to remove regulations, does it? It's not like such a thing would take that long or even require debate. All one has to do is to not fund it, not enforce it, and it's moot. Look up the Sherman act for a prime example. Still on the books, but hasn't been enforced since Reagan.
It's this kind of thing that really matters in the real world. Laws don't mean a thing if they are ignored, and regulations can be ignored even easier than laws can. It's been the cause of a lot of our problems we are dealing with today.
The Sherman Act wasn't enforced initially either--by both Harrison, the Republican who signed the Act, and Cleveland, the only Democrat to win the presidency between 1865 and 1932, and the only president to serve two terms that weren't consecutive. Indeed, it was first used against Unions!!!!!
Hypothetically, the chief magistrate--the president--ought to be impeached for not enforcing the laws on the books because that's supposedly the president's #1 job. That presidents were able to ignore laws has set infamous precedents that we see today with the notion that the president is above the law. The fault for it all lies with the 1787 constitution and those who illegally wrote it.
I actually think Ron Paul deserves an opportunity. That's why I think registering Republican so I can vote in their primary and reregister back to being Green is 2012's strategic voting plan. It would be almost impossible for Congress to block the rollback of the Empire, and I do seem to remember he advocates the regulation of Wall Street--The Money Power.
Birdbrain Alley, you obviously don;t know much about Ron Paul. He most certainly is against slavery. He is for some regulation, but as little as necessary.
He opposes the "War on Drugs", "the "Patriot Act" and "Warrantless Surveillence".
He opposed our invasion of Iraq. He supports medical marijuana.
By the way, I suggest reading this site to learn what Libertarians actually stand for
http://www.lp.org/issues
Kelami, I once wrote this about the Libertarian Party a long time ago on another site. I think that it's important that you take note of it and try to understand why it's looked at as more of just another rightwing party than independent.
==================================================
The problem with Libertarians is that they're not consistent with what they believe in. The only part of the libertarian platform that could be taken at all seriously is the civil libertarian platform where it's all about civil liberties. But where are the Libertarians when it's needed? I can respect left-leaning libertarians but the right-leaning libertarians are dishonest about the word "freedom". When one looks back at the last 40 years of history, the libertarians have succeeded on laissez faire but allowed civil liberties to fail. Here's a powerful historical example. They would cheer for the repeal of Glass-Stiegel and Fairness Doctrine acts but less frequently call for repealing the "Patriot" Act. Hell, even on spending they concentrate too much smashing funding for social programs but when asked about military spending, they give a weak "yes, that too" response. They're very inconsistent on their own ideas on spending and the hardcore rightists pick up on that weakness to curtail freedom. Even more recently, the Libertarians have been silent on Obamacare as time passes by. Did they just find out that their favorite drug and insurance companies get their "freedom" to rob even more while we lose our freedom to choose not to do business with the insurance goons? You can't call it "freedom" by forcing people to pick among the limited bad choices or punishment for choosing none of the above.
By the way, the libertarians have been silent on the "war on drugs" most of the time and giving less frequent weak responses on supposedly opposing it. But never mind. The libertarians themselves are divided on women's reproductive rights whereas in the past, they would have all been pro-choice. They don't speak up when minorities are given life without parole just for smoking pot nor do they speak out when women are harassed and/or denied their reproductive rights. A couple of times when my wife picked up her birth control pills in the past, she had to tell the "pro-life" pharmacist that her parents came from India even though she's white and then they would let her have the pills. At the same time, libertarians would cry "freedom" if anyone brought up the dangers of viagra. What happened to freedom to control one's own bodies? Adding it all up, no wonder the libertarians get a lot of bad rap and get looked at as racist and misogynist ! They can't keep even simple ideas consistent.
I've gotten carried away at times too by the libertarians and the trick always ended up baiting me on the left-leaning libertarian ideas. Hard as it is to correct that weakness, I'll continue to make notes and bring up questions on consistency and honesty because that matters as much as does freedom itself. To lose freedom is bad enough but to lose the real meaning of freedom through baiting and deception is even worse.
==================================================
Where have you been? Libertarians have indeed spoken out against the war on drugs, the Patriot Act, Warrantless Surveillence.
In 2004 the Ohio LP fought a developer wanting to sieze houses in a development th build a mall. Some of the home owners joined the LP.
It was the Green and Libertarian parties that challenged the Ohio elections of 2004.
Do you know that the Democrat that Ron Paul most admires is Dennis Kucinich?
The LP platform may look nice on the surface but I've been witnessing more divide from within. I'm glad that some libertarians spoke out against war on drugs and Big Brother but why aren't they lobbying or campaigning against them with anything close to the same fervor as pro-NRA, tax cuts for the wealthy, deregulation, union busting, and privatizing as many public services as they can. Ron Paul may have some good overlapping with progressives but I don't see him capitalizing much on it. As for 2004, that's just throwing a bone. I would vote for Paul over Obama but beyond that, I can't see the point of letting the Libertarian Party run the same government that they're hell bent on getting rid of.
Check this site for the War on drugs
http://www.lp.org/news/press-releases/libertarian-party-40-years-is-enough-end-the-drug-war
Check this site for our platform http://www.lp.org/platform
"KeLeMi"
Libertarians have one common basic goal.
Cowboy economics above all else.
Justice based upon personal whims and social status.
Ron Paul is a good talker, just like Obama is a good talker.
Blah, blah, blah, freedom, liberty, justice for all (who have money).
I believe this nation is already too desperately indifferent and disconnected from equal justice for all people. The libertarians would only make the situation worse.
I cannot get over the fact that you mention the old Republican party and how they were great legislators.
What world was that??? when did I miss this phenomena??
Bottom line is that the Republicans have been attacking our citizenry, and the public monies for as long as I can remember!!!
Now that you have grown these psychotic sociopaths you cry wolf!!!.
Well good luck trying to "reverse the curse" that you created...
Than again I guess you can say the same for the democraps too!!!!
The one part that I agree with is it is time to end party association, and come up with a independent approach to government..
Time for a mass upheaval of these corporate controlled parties, and no more "vote for the lesser of two evils" YUK!!!!!!
Reminds me of that quote from a German economist when he was trying to explain the United States to some of his colleagues, "you have to understand that what is going in in America is a form of looting".
This is an article by a witness to the looting, of corporations kicking in the windows of our homes and walking off with our posessions.
Certainly Nancy came to the realization of corruption in government rather late in the game. Still, it's nice of her to go public with her dismay. I'm always glad to see people of both of the major parties talk reasonably--such a rare treat.
My sentiments exactly, Elizabeth H.
Ms. Argenziano comes across as one of the last of a dying breed: a principled "Rockefeller Republican". It's ironic, to say the least, that her political philosophy is now well to the "left" of mainstream Republicans and Democrats alike.
Anyone who starts to awaken to the "corporate hegemony" (her words) that has taken over the country is okay with me. Just because she has been a republican and duped by the propaganda in the past does not mean she should be summarily dismissed. Understanding the complexity of the corporate welfare state, i.e. the War Party, is not an easy thing. The myths of empire pervade our entire lives and unless one is very actively reading between the lines, reading non conventional history, and listening to the alternatives in the media, it's very easy to be duped. I'm continually amazed at a number of my so called liberal-progressive friends who are essentially clueless sometimes, repeating the myths we all grew up with.
Awakening to reality can be a slow process and I applaud Nancy Argenziano for writing this and Common Dreams for printing it.
I guess my post sounded sort of snarky, but I'm also glad to see someone wake up to the corporate hegemony. It's a real relief to see many Republicans say out loud that their party is batshit. I also wish more of my liberal/progressive friends would get over the whole American exceptionalist thing and start realizing that the hegemony really doesn't care about them a bit. But it's a hard thing for many to realize.
Elizabeth, I was agreeing with you. My criticism was with some on these posts that are dismissing Nancy merely, it seems, because she's a republican. Some seem to have a knee jerk negative reaction because of her affiliations, despite what she said. It makes me wonder if they read the article. And it makes me wonder how in the hell we are ever going to defeat the corporatocracy if we don't find some unity with others from all persuasions.
My dismissal stems from the fact that her opbjections are essentially long-standing GOP policy preferences dating back at least as far as the Contract on America in 1994. Her positions on deregulation are utterly disingenuous, because if you cared about the EPA and those things you would've had a significant objection with the GOP long before 2011 rolled around.
I really think this is a campaign positioning piece more than anything else.But even if you want to believe that someone like Nancy really does answer to a better angel, the reality is that she's not offerring anything to replace the current trajectory with other than nebulous implied promises of a bit more regulation. I don't read anything indicating she's ready to seriously war on corporate power. At all.
Now, I'd be happy to be wrong. It would be nice to know that people on the Right are capable of recognizing when a joke's gone too far. So we'll see what she does in the future. But I think it's wise to be seriously skeptical.
The only purpose a piece like this serves ultimately in a palce like CD is really to bolster Democratic mobilization--it is essentially a "lesser evil" piece in a roundabout way. I tend to frown on those things, but I admit that's just me.
Actions do speak louder than words, so we'll see where she goes from here. Interesting perspective you have (your last paragraph), makes me look at her piece, and CD's motives, a little more. Thanks.
I have to admit that the "corporate hegemony" has been quite effective in acquiring and maintaining control.
Now that more and more of us are finally waking up to the fact that we've been had, there are no longer electoral mechanisms by which we can fix anything. Instant Runoff Voting is not moving fast enough and easy ballot access for third parties is a thing of the past. RIP
Nancy, and many other Republicans like her, those I've been surrounded by my entire adult life (many were my friends), are called the RINOs now. While it's true they've always wanted to do away with the "handouts," "entitlements," "welfare," - all the Democratic programs that help people, they also had a caring and compassionate nature, and worked, as Nancy did, to get better care for the elderly in nursing homes, as as she does, cared about many other things. And while I could never agree with most of their basic agenda, I've admired the work I've seen them do.
These people that have taken over the Republican party don't have a compassionate bone in their bodies, and they won't rest until they have destroyed everything good about this country. I think they'd even destroy all liberals if they could figure out a way to do it. But who knows, if they manage to get control of everything as they plan to do, who's going to stop them then? We probably should start buying up those guns as they have. Not too many have pitchforks these days. These people are nothing more than a pack of rabid animals carrying the cross and wrapped in the flag(I won't give a specific animal name, because there isn't one on the earth that comes close to these).
Nancy says, "I take offense that they use the hard-working grassroots level Republicans to help promote a philosophy that they do not practice."
I'd say it's time for those hard-working grassroots level Republicans to stop supporting these people. It's their hard work and donations getting them elected. They need to think about that, and decide whether they want to support them or become independent.
Rep. Argenziano has my sympathies about a good number of things she mentioned in her piece. I am a Democratic who has voted republican in the past on occasion; but no more. The war on women, instead of job creation is just more than I can stand and refuse to accept. If the republicans want to continue to be a force in our nation's affairs, they need to change their ways and their bad attitudes. I hope many are recalled and that the dems and independents find a way to reclaim this country for its citizens.
I've also been a Democrat who voted Republican. I voted for candidates I felt were best qualified for the job from both parties. I only voted for Democratic Presidents and Governors, but I felt that the two houses of Congress should be balanced. I was surprised when I learned this wasn't the normal way of voting.
Now I'm an Independent, and after 2000, GW and his goons broke me of ever voting Republican again.
The republicans claim to oppose "BIG GOVERNMENT", yet when it came to the "WAR ON DRUGS", the "PATRIOT ACT" and "WARRANTLESS SURVEILLENCE" they let "BIG GOVERNMENT" become a "MONSTER".
Actually, the opposition to "big government" is a spin promulgated by the overclass in two flavors: the Classic Republican variety, exemplified by Ronald Reagan and the odious Grover Norquist et al; the New Democratic variety, exemplified by DLC Democrats from Bill Clinton to Obama, and the infamous Congressional Blue Dogs.
The Democratic spin is less direct than the Norquist approach of "shrinking government until it's small enough to drown in a bathtub". The Dems spin it as "smart", "streamlined" government; they don't use the heavy "libertarian" seasoning that's in the Republican recipe, or express the intense antipathy to regulation embedded in Republican "small government" advocacy.
But the popular, demagogic opposition to "big government" is bogus insofar as both parties serve the Hollow State-- a model of government based on the premise that government only exists to guarantee economic sovereignty and security.
The Hollow State philosophy utterly rejects the notion that government exists to directly serve the ordinary unprivileged citizen. Instead, the Hollow State government protects and serves capital and property.
That's why not only the Republicans, but both parties enthusiastically support a bloated "defense" and "state security" apparatus. The "big government" they pretend to hate comprises only the social-service, social justice, civil-liberties, and citizen-protecting regulatory aspects of government.
Pejorative terms like "entitlements" or the "welfare state" are popularized to denigrate and disparage the manifestations of government that are truly "of the people, by the people, and for the people".
To the Hollow-State hive-mind, a humane Compassionate State is an overstuffed obscenity or mutant.
But it has no objection at all to a grotesquely inflated and swollen government that protects, nurtures, secures, and serves wealth and privilege. The Hollow State government is a vast fortress of walls, ramparts, and gates surrounding the ultimate gated community: a "shining city on the hill" with residency restricted to the overclass and its ruling-class vassals and servants.
We are the hollow men
We are the stuffed men
Leaning together
Headpiece filled with straw, Alas!
Our dried voices, when
We whisper together
Are quiet and meaningless
As wind in dry grass
Or rats' feet over broken glass
In our dry cellar
Shape without form, shade without colour,
Paralysed force, gesture without motion:
Those who have crossed
With direct eyes, to death's other Kingdom
Remember us-if at all-not as lost
Violent souls, but only
As the hollow men
The stuffed men.
from T.S. Eliot's "The Hollow Men"
Very well said.
del
I don't suppose there an an election coming up? OK it sounds good, but the most common characteristic of politicians from both parties, but maybe especially the Republicans, is to lie and sound good, and then turn around and do terrible things to people. It's the prime qualification to be a politician now. Obama sounded good too. Don't believe the lies!
Fool 'em once, fool 'em twice, fool 'em a dozen times -- shame on them all. An honest politician would not, could not, be part of either wing, D or R, of the fascist party.
She says "I have been asked by many people to run for elected office again, to stay involved." Right -- this is the core of the article -- it's a campaign pitch. 'Vote for me!'
"If belonging to a political party means having to follow blindly, count me out."
Yeah -- OK -- so count her her out, vote socialist, green, independent, or whatever -- but don't vote fascist. Many people are wising up to this -- I hope enough of them are, and also realizing that voting is just part of the game and the machine and much more is required to stop the fascists and destruction of the country. The machine and the lying propaganda must be broken.
A little too late to apologize and make any regrets as a Florida Republican. Where was she when Willie Logan, a populist progressive, was getting marginalized by both Republicans and white "conservative" Democrats such as Buzz Ritchie? What about Alan Grayson when the Florida Republicans were politically lynching him all the way to defeat last year? And why did she wait this long to apologize when she knew better that Republicans who weren't "conservative" enough were getting purged en masse starting in the 1980s? I don't know if her regrets are for real or not but if she follows up her regrets with populist progressive action, then I might take her seriously.
I'm okay with it if it's sincere, but something about this piece and this person screamed "campaign!" to me. Florida conservatives are a varied bunch, and I know the Tea Party kin don't poll all that well in some of those older strongholds (ie: Miami), so much would depend on her district.
I agree with your last sentence. it's not a conversion unless you walk the walk.
I guess Nancy stood by Ronald Reagan when he opened his campaign in Biloxi, Mississippi and souped up Nixon's southern strategy to the max. Or when GHWB pulled out his Willie Horton ads. Not all republicans are racist hate mongers, but all republicans are allied with racist hate mongers.
Actually, it was Philadelphia Mississippi, the home of the murderers of the 3 civil rights workers in the Mississippi burning case. He also made a huge deal about "states rights" during that speech, which is definitely a code for racists to hear and kick up their ears over.
"I intensely despise all Republican politicians,....Not that Democrats are much better." Democrats are not better, so why don't you despise them as well?
Here I go again.
A republican once told us that we had/have a
"government of the people,
by the people,
for the people."
Where?
I'm at the point where I now see the "greatness" of Lincoln as somewhat delusional public relations. I do not want this assessment to be true, but Lincoln's words did not reflect reality then and they do not now.
I do not mean to imply that either of the inherently corrupt major parties are worth supporting. Neither of the parties are working for a better world for anyone who isn't filthy rich.
Big patriotic sculpture (like big dreamy words) in the U.S.A. seems to mostly be about deception and brainwashing.
Even the profoundly creative "Vietnam War Memorial" only represents a small percentage of the war's victims. We are taught to dismiss the "others." We are not supposed to see the true costs of our desperation, arrogance, and greed.
As Ani DiFranco said, "Here's a toast to all the people living under the stone-cold gaze of Mt. Rushmore."
It is a global capitalist gaze and the people, their laws, and the environment, are merely resources to be manipulated at will by the overseers.
Thanks for speaking up, Nancy. Both parties have been taken over by Big Business, so don't feel bad. It's just the 'job' of the 'bad cop' to push for privatization, while the 'good cop' sorrowfully and with 'much regret' cedes ground. I no longer know which of these cops I hold in more contempt.
The Patriots who broke away from the British so long ago are rolling over in their graves at the very ugly politics of today. Those great folks who wrote the Declaration of Independence and Constitution have been smeared. Our truly great society is nothing but a total sham run by politicians with no backbone and one Party that could care less about any of us including those who voted these scoundrels into office.
Now after many years of sunshine the clouds of a decaying Democracy throws it's ugly shade on us.
It's not to late to stop this decay but we all better wake up now before what was the Great Society will resemble what is happening in the Middle East and will pale their ugliness.
We need now a new Revolution of ideas that make us a great Country or a we will decay into Anarchy. Senator McCain is right in blasting the GOP and their Isolationism and I add their truly ugly ideas. "WE THE PEOPLE" will fade into oblivion if we do not tell those in Washington that we have had enough.
No matter where you stand Right/Left or Middle it will not matter if The United States becomes just a footnote in history.
The 1787 constitution is the result of a coup--the unlawful overturning of the Articles of Confederation--its plotters are thus criminals of the highest order, not individuals to be revered as we are indoctrinated.
I disagree. It seems to me the framers were trying to invent republican democracy amidst very turbulant political circumstances. Of course without those circumstances they wouldn't have needed to invent the thing.
In any event, perhaps their biggest mistake was in the details of the electoral process. Then they needed to get a pretty unrully mob of parties to agree to sign on and the compromises were not pretty.
It is wrong to comdemn them for not being all seeing gods. They were men of great intellect with the highest of intentions and their experiment has survived to give us the longest standing government on the planet.
In the end the Bill of Rights was the saving grace but if we ignore it we have no one to blame but ourselves or as the man said, "A republic if you can keep it."
Confusing. She professes to being a true old school Republican who favors deregulation, yet complains that her minimum standard legislation for nursing homes was attacked. Sorry, but deregulation means exposing old folks, children, vulnerable groups, average people, the environment, etc to the profit motives of shareholders.