Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Ending War Means Ending Violence Against Women
Rosemary Gonzalez was murdered in 2009, the victim of a war that ended in 1996. One day, 17-year-old Rosemary said good-bye to her mother Betty, walked out of their small house on the outskirts of Guatemala City and was never seen alive again.
Rosemary and Betty lived together in the poor neighborhood of Barcenas, under the constant shadow of violence. Across Guatemala, nearly 5,000 women have been killed in the past decade, attacked for the simple fact of being women. The women of Barcenas know well this fear—they live at the epicenter of this crisis.
In Guatemala, generations of women have faced murderous violence, but at its core is war. Now, the same dynamic is emerging in Iraq.
Guatemalan Women Under Siege
Why was Rosemary Gonzalez killed? Why are Guatemalan women the targets of a ten- year rape and killing spree? The answers go beyond the motives of any one culprit.
For 36 years, Guatemala was roiled by a brutal civil war that the United Nations characterized as genocide, mainly against Mayan Indigenous People. Through the years of the conflict, tens of thousands of Guatemalan women and girls were raped, tortured and murdered. These were not attacks carried out randomly; violence against women was deliberately calculated by U.S.-backed fighters to traumatize families and destroy the capacity of communities to resist and organize.
Mayan women were targeted because they are the lynchpins of their families and communities. In many instances, women were gang-raped in front of their families. Pregnant women faced specific atrocities, tortured and murdered in order to cut off the next generation of the community.
Multiple human rights investigations have found evidence that this violence against women was part of a systematic counterinsurgency strategy by the government. Over one million members of the Guatemalan army, paramilitary forces and police were trained to attack women with rape, mutilation and torture. Today's attacks reproduce the gruesome tactics of these wartime atrocities.
Many Guatemalan feminists say that is because the perpetrators were never brought to justice once the peace accords were signed in 1996. They were simply re-absorbed into society, taking on new roles as police or in powerful criminal gangs that infiltrated many government agencies.
Meanwhile, violence against women continues to be tolerated. Women are blamed for their own attacks, for having walked alone at night or for the style of their dress.
The Latin American women's movement has given this crisis a name: femicide. It is defined by various forms of gender-based violence against women, including murder, and characterized by impunity for perpetrators and a lack of justice processes for victims. It occurs in conditions of social upheaval, armed conflict, violence between powerful rival gangs and militias, rapid economic transformation and the demise of traditional forms of state law enforcement.
For Guatemalan women, particularly those who are young, poor or Indigenous, the war against them continues -- and Rosemary is one of its victims.
Young women in Rosemary's community of Barcenas have few options other than backbreaking work in the maquilas (sweatshops) for meager pay. After long shifts, they walk home at night, looking over their shoulders for the attack they know could come at any moment.
Rosemary wanted something different. She had studied hard in school and had dreams of university. Rosemary was looking for a job outside of the maquilas, hoping to build a better life for herself and for her mother. Instead, her life was cut short. Now, her mother Betty has devoted her own life to bringing justice for Rosemary, demanding answers from judges and police and rallying her community to her support.
To Iraq and Beyond
In Guatemala, the wartime tactic of violence against women became embedded in communities and cultures. In fact, violence in general became so prevalent that the murder rate in Guatemala today is higher than it was for much of the civil war, and the widespread rape and killing is a direct legacy of the war.
In Iraq, the U.S. invasion in 2003 also triggered a surge in violence against women. The overthrow of the Ba'ath regime ended decades of nominally secular rule, in which women consolidated certain human rights gains. The U.S. occupation brought to power Islamists whose vision of the world hinged on a fundamentalist policing of social roles for women.
Women soon found themselves the targets of deadly violence by sectarian militias, often for committing the "offense" of daring to challenge the killers' vision of society. Those who were killed were journalists, doctors, intellectuals or women who otherwise held a job outside of the home. Few numbers were gathered of those who were attacked for exercising their basic human rights as women. In fact, the U.S. occupation authorities actively discouraged the gathering of mortality data.
When figures were released, Iraqi women's organizations cautioned that the actual number of women being harassed, assaulted, abducted, raped and killed by Islamist militias was much higher than statistics show. As in Guatemala and elsewhere, most crimes against women were not reported because of stigma, fear of retaliation or lack of confidence in the police.
As in Guatemala, Iraqi women's organizations emphasized the complicity of state authorities in violence against women. They reported clear links between the Islamist militias who controlled and worked in the police force and criminal gangs involved in forced prostitution and trafficking of women. These concerns place violence against Iraqi women squarely within the paradigm of femicide in Guatemala.
Grassroots Responses
In Guatemala, a grassroots organization called the Women Workers' Committee has created an oasis of safety for women and girls. They organize workshops and community watch groups to help women know their rights to life, health and decent work and to enhance their safety. They provide crucial counseling for traumatized women and girls and legal services for families of murdered women.
Guatemalan women have learned a bitter lesson. The crucible of war allowed violence against women to become entrenched in communities. Femicide has become the "new normal," something women must think about every day.
Leaders of the Iraqi women's movement are fighting to ensure that the violence that escalated as a result of the U.S. war and occupation does not become their "normal" in the years to come. A group called the Organization of Women's Freedom in Iraq is a bulwark in the struggle to defend women's human rights. They have built a network of women's shelters that help women escape violence. They publish a newspaper and run Iraq's first and only women's radio station, broadcasting the message that violence against women must end.
Women in Iraq and Guatemala have saved lives and pulled communities back from the brink. What's more, the global women's movement has created the connections that allow women in one community to learn from the crises and solutions of another. Key to this exchange among women is the understanding that preventing femicide requires ending wartime impunity for violence against women; opposing the normalization of violence in social institutions ranging from law to popular media; and demanding the full range of women's human rights as a centerpiece of democratic society.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


18 Comments so far
Show AllFemicide is the right word and the connection to war is long standing. Warriors of all cultures have bonds in a masculinist culture that now calls all killed in war, who are not military, collateral damage.
Patriarchy has long been a death worshipping culture. Patriarchy wedded to capitalism, with its expanding technology for death, is now killing the earth itself. Men should not be in charge, they have proved incapable of global housekeeping and household account management. Wall Street is a rape culture too they just have enough money to hide their evil deeds. Of course their economic rape of the poor is seen as business as usual. When will American women realize that they cannot have sane healthy children in this corrupt society and that maternal care must include having a real voice in democracy.
Madre is a great women's organization working in some of the toughest spots on the globe to help women. Thanks for your work and you words here.
Thank you, Artemix. A lot of men in this forum don't know how to take this information in. Perhaps it's so repugnant to them, that they shy away from commenting at all.
Reading this, I also think of the women whose lives are a virtual prison sentence in Afghanistan, the women raped in Haiti's post-quake tent camps, the women brutally gang-banged in Congo and Rwanda, and the girls killed along the Mexican border.
Just like the climate changes bursting out here and there, these wounds TO real women represent a tearing of the very weave of The Force of life that holds the paradigm of the living world together. With all this brutality thrust upon so many women, how can the center hold? Indeed, much is coming apart.
The rage against women as seen in these formally orchestrated attacks, on these women, and so many others, hardly suggests that there's been anywhere near enough EVOLUTION in the understanding of gender rights, equal rights, or the key of all keys: the notion of true partnership.
I have been VICIOUSLY attacked in this forum for stating these ideas; ideas that should be MORE than obvious. It's as if to some, slaying the messenger will make the pain of the message (and those who feel responsible for it) go away. It's not unlike the strategy used by those who STILL shill for nuclear power, or STILL say that global warming in a theory, or STILL say that our economy will recover, etc.
In any case, learning of the loss of huge swaths of forest, the dead zones growing at sea, the vanishing species... added to the devastation of these women, makes everything scream out for a new understanding, one that respects life at its source. Mother nature extends to motherhood, which means women, and a related respect for the wombs of life that they biologically carry.
So much unnecessary pain... so many places where Mars, the expressions of anger, violence, self-interest devoid of the realization of its impact on others, the illusion of being #1, the patriarchal premise of male superiority, and war, war, and more war... and look where this approach has gotten our planet?
Evo Morales is one man who gets it. It is time to HONOR the Mother Earth, and from there, we might learn to honor life, and those who bestow it, and why it is important to respect BOTH genders. New forms of power-sharing, along with a new ethos extended to the natural world, should follow.
Inevitable detractors: Take note. I am NOT bashing men, I am advancing the understanding of a need for partnership, a respect for women's bodies, and by extension, a respect for the Body of Gaia/Earth Mother.
"I don't understand why Womankind couldn't bash men in the global sense."
I can't speak for all women but women generally don't consider revenge as the solution and I could see why. Revenge may work at first but in the long run, it will backfire as soon as the war between the genders flares back up. The goal should be for men and women to clear up each of their misunderstandings and respect each other's differences. Women are generally ahead on respect and understanding. Something needs to be done so that men can catch up to women on their level of respect and understanding.
Ok, first off, i wrote about the same thing on another topic and CD never posted it, but anyways.
For years that i can remember(back to Vietnam anyway)the Americans were involved in a lot of rape...pillage and murder. There were so many American/Vietnamese babys born through rape of villages and not all but most failed to help them. In Mexico, there would be just as many women and children die through the American backed criminals, in Iraq...same...Korea...same...Afghanistan...same.
As the writer says...Leaders of the Iraqi women's movement are fighting to ensure that the violence that escalated as a result of the U.S. war and occupation does not become their "normal" in the years to come.
I am sorry to say, it has, it will and will always going to be like that because as far as America is concerned, they are right and the rest of the world can go down with them.
in1954 Guatemala elected a democratic government headed by president Arbenz. because almost all the land was held by a tiny minority of rich people, the need for land reform was urgent
and necessary. Arbenz then did institute a land reform plan.
some of this land was claimed by United Fruit, but was not being used. "land reform" in the 50s was considered a little bit red. more to the point in this case John Foster Dulles was secretary of state, and also on the board of United Fruit. As was his brother Alan, who was also the head of the CIA. when the boys asked Eisenhower oi take out Arbenz, and were asked why, they explained he was a communist. in the 50s,
being a communist was worse than being a Muslim today, so the execution of Arbenz was carried out, and a military dictatorship installed. this led to an asymetric civil war, with the junta being backed by the U.S. . It was called "Operation Success". All the rapes and murders since then are the result.
this back story to the agony of Guatemala must never be forgotten.
Over thousands of years, men have waged war and oppressed women, children, and other men. The US military has institutionalized a culture of rape, even of fellow soldiers. Our US military trained the military in Guatemala and other countries to do exactly what they have done for decades. We glorify soldiers, when in fact they commit acts that in civilian society we would condemn. For all the bad things we said about Saddam, he did grant rights and education to thousands of women. What can we do to change it? I think the first step is for each of us to treat others with kindness and love, especially children. All men who commit rape and murder suffered violence at the hands of their parents. Women must lead, because men have lost moral authority.
Tom: I appreciate your courage and sensitivity in posting this message. You know something, often it's about women JUST being listened to. Remember how Dr. Floweres got no audience on the health care debate? or Sybil Edmonds was quickly hushed up for the rat she smelled (as a translator) around 911. Ann Wright had to leave the military to speak openly about human rights, and on and on.
When women are invited to decision making tables, in the same way that Obama proved his bona fides to the elites (as one who would NOT rock the boat with any meaningful changes to the status quo), they have already shown their allegiance to the same establishment/power structures that oppress minorities; and now the old pattern has morphed into a very obvious class war. (Progress was made to change this pattern from the l940's-l970's, so the pattern is NOT inevitable.)
The first step on the road to establishing hierarchies of power and privilege was the gender disparity, from there, the capacity to see any other human being--generally on the basis of skin tone (or sometimes based on the degree to which they emulated western culture) as lesser, was a natural evolution.
Once a group is demonized and defined as an entity endowed with second class status, the sky's the limit, if prejudice, control, and unbalanced power initiatives are the goal.
I'm sorry to hear about the plight of women in Guatemala thanks to wars and U.S. interference against the will of the Guatemalen people. There's still one piece missing from this article, more about the feminists in Guatelmala. I will assume that poverty and strict male dominance made it difficult for women in general to organize. But it's still a mystery about what went on with the feminist activists in that country. Was there any serious attempt to organize more women and bring on board men in that country who were open minded to feminists? If so, what went wrong and how?
I don't disagree with this article, but I'd like to add another two cents to it.
Barack Obama, the war mongering recipent of the Nobel Dynamite 'Peace Prize', is finished. He's done! The ruling class has now decided to $ellect Michellion Bachmaniac, a Jeeezass crazy woman that's itchin' to get her $well manicured hands on the anti-Muslim bomb.
Okay! Tell me! How can we have peace in the world if violence is done by either gender? Ending war means not only ending violence against women and children... but also against the men. Against ALL human beings! The problem is bigger than gender.
I'm pissed off with Obama for flaunting the Nobel Peace Prize to continue the wars and occupations but there's no way Michele Bachmann will win. I don't expect any Republican to beat Obama next year given the current lineup of doofuses.
I don't think that the author meant to exclude men from picture. In almost every given war, women more than men usually end up bearing the brunt of bad memories and mental wounds. Mental PTSD can be far worse than physical PTSD. I know this all sounds confusing but try to think about it and don't any of this as trying to justify gender bias.
Men will never give up the thrill of violating women and children especially in war because it is very acceptable and easily hidden in the context of the general slaughter. Men are incredibly stupid and love violence as anyone with a brain can see by looking at what they do.
Whoa, hold it sir. That's not true of every single men. True, a lot of men can be the kind of jerks you describe but let's not be too broad with that paint brush.
So as long as the women aren't hurt, war can continue? Are women all innocent victims of male warmaking with none making any pro-war contribution? Don't they sometimes look upon their warrior sons with pride? Couldn't they raise their male children with strong anti-war sentiments?
Lots of mothers and wives/girlfriends are generally known to try their best to stop their sons and hubbies/boyfriends respectively from getting sucked into enlisting. Lack of education in peace, redefining defense to include invading and occupying, and peer pressure to "look strong" has made it difficult to nearly impossible for women's long term efforts to raise their kids away from the war machine to significantly succeed.
Here's my sensitive spiritual post of the day.
Ending war means ending violence.
To the children.
To child soldiers.
To young men caught up in war.
To older men.
To civilians.
To the animals and plants.
To the earth.
To All and Everything.