Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Six Wars and Counting
Washington Reaches for the Record Book
President Obama recently reshuffled his top Washington warriors, sending CIA Director Leon Panetta, a man who knows Congress well, on to the Pentagon to replace retiring Secretary of Defense Robert Gates. In turn, the president is bringing in General David Petraeus, present Afghan War Commander, former Centcom commander, and former Iraq War commander (as well as “Bush’s general”), to run the Agency.
Whatever the local politics involved, and the Petraeus appointment ensures that the potentially popular general will be on the political sidelines for campaign year 2012, these moves catch the zeitgeist of our Washington moment. Since the bin Laden assassination, in which U.S. military special operations forces “commanded” by Panetta took out the al-Qaeda leader, a new face of American war, “where sovereignty is irrelevant, armies tangential, and decisions are secret,” has been emerging according to Foreign Policy in Focus analyst Conn Hallinan.
With the latest news (revealed last week by the New York Times) that the U.S. has launched a significant “intensification” of its secret air campaign against Yemeni tribesmen believed to be connected with al-Qaeda, the U.S. is now involved in no less than six wars. Count ‘em, if you don’t believe me: Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Libya, and what used to be called the Global War on Terror.
In anyone’s book, that certainly qualifies as a working definition of “endless” war, but that doesn’t mean endlessly the same kind of war. Let’s look at this, war by war:
Iraq: Now largely the dregs of a counterinsurgency operation, this war will not end in 2011. At his confirmation hearings, for instance, Panetta cited the existence of al-Qaeda in Iraq as a reason for U.S. troops to remain beyond an agreed-upon year-end withdrawal date. Should those troops actually leave, however, the war will still go on, even if in quite a different form. A gargantuan, increasingly militarized State Department “mission” in that country, complete with its own “army” and “air force” of perhaps 5,100 mercenaries, will evidently keep the faith.
Afghanistan: This remains a full-scale U.S. Army-run counterinsurgency war, backed by a major special operations/CIA counterterror war.
Pakistan: A full-scale CIA-run drone war in the Pakistani borderlands is actually expanding. In the post-9/11 era, this has been the first of Washington’s “covert” or "shadow" wars (which no longer means “secret” -- it’s all over the news almost daily -- but something closer to “off the books,” as in beyond the reach of any form of significant popular or congressional oversight or accountability). Panetta is calling for more emphasis on such off-the-books wars in which U.S. military operatives might, as in the bin Laden operation, temporarily find themselves under the command of the CIA.
Libya: Officially a NATO air war, this one is nonetheless partially run by the Pentagon with targeting assistance from various U.S. intelligence agencies. It involves both direct U.S. air strikes and support for strikes by various NATO and Arab allies fronting the operation. It is also, for Americans, a “war” in name only since, except in the case of engine malfunction, there is essentially no way the Libyans can harm a U.S. pilot. It is also an example of another air war that, while destructive, has proven itself incapable of fulfilling its stated aims. Months later, Gaddafi remains alive and more or less in power, while NATO flags.
Yemen: Another of those “covert” air wars, being run, according to the Times, by the Pentagon’s Joint Special Operations Command, closely coordinated with the CIA out of a secret office in the Yemeni capital.
The Global War on Terror: While the Obama administration officially discarded the Bush-era name, it expanded the war and the forces meant to fight it in places like Somalia. U.S. special operations forces now pursue war-on-terror tasks in at least 75 countries and who knows how many CIA and other intelligence agents are involved as well.
Think of all this as a kind of mix-and-match version of war that increasingly integrates civilian branches of the government like the State Department, an ever more warlike CIA (once known as “the president’s private army”), the regular Army, Marines, and Air Force, ever-growing drone air power (split between an officially civilian intelligence agency and the military), and a secret combined military force of perhaps 20,000 special operatives.
With the face of American war changing in striking ways and at least six wars, none going particularly well, on or off the books, no one should be surprised if, as retired Air Force lieutenant colonel and historian William Astore makes clear in his latest piece, Washington as a war capital increasingly looks like a new kind of town. In the meantime, when it comes to how many wars Americans can fight at once, Washington is reaching for the record books.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



82 Comments so far
Show AllThey haven't won yet. I still want our president to explain what the hell is going on in Libya. This has nothing to do with the Libyan people and everything to do with the financial world. I want this president to tell me who exactly those armed Libyan rebels are and who armed them. I want him to explain to me why the people of Libya want out, when their government provides them healthcare and housing subsidies, etc::
"Gaddafi's Unreported Agenda
As despots go, he's not all bad. Under his 1999 Decision No. 111, all Libyans get free healthcare, education, training, rehabilitation, housing assistance, disability and old-age benefits, interest-free state loans, subsidies to study abroad and for couples when they marry, and practically free gasoline. Moreover, Libya's hospitals and private clinics are some of the region's best.
Overall, though affected by poverty and unemployment like elsewhere, Libyans achieved the highest African standard of living because Gaddafi used oil revenues for economic development. According to "Qaddafi and the Libyan Revolution:"
"The young people are well dressed, well fed and well educated....Every Libyan gets free, and often excellent, education, medical and health services. New colleges and hospitals are impressive by any international standard. All Libyans have a house or a flat, a car, and most have televisions" and other conveniences. "Compared with most citizens of Third World countries, and with many (others), Libyans have it very good indeed," including decent housing or a rent-free apartment.
Gaddafi's Green Book, in fact, states, "The house is a basic need of both the individual and the family, therefore it should not be owned by others." It also covers other socially beneficial policies and says:
-- "Women, like men, are human beings.
-- ....(A)ll individuals have a natural right to self-expression by any means....;
-- In a socialist society no person may own a private means of transportation for the purpose of renting to others, because this represents controlling the needs of others.
-- The democratic system is a cohesive structure whose foundation stones are firmly laid above the other (through People's Conferences and Committees). There is absolutely no conception of democratic society other than this.
-- No representation of the people - representation is a falsehood. The existence of parliaments underlies the absence of the people, for democracy can only exist with the presence of the people and not in the presence of representatives of the people."
http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2011/04/19/what-next-in-libya
Wish we had it that good here in the States.
GARDEN: Thank you for providing this background information. I was not apprised (previously) of this data. It is quite reminiscent of why US elites hate Chavez. Useful stuff to know...
"As despots go, he's not all bad. Under his 1999 Decision No. 111, all Libyans get free healthcare, education, training, rehabilitation, housing assistance, disability and old-age benefits, interest-free state loans, subsidies to study abroad and for couples when they marry, and practically free gasoline. Moreover, Libya's hospitals and private clinics are some of the region's best."
You can bet Obama will do away with that socialism for the masses when he kills Kadafhi and then will institute American style socialism for the rich, as Jesus H. Christ intended.
Damn! I want to move to Libya!
Well...not now. Guess the U.S. screwed that country up also.
Petition to The United States House of Representatives, The United States Senate and President Barack Obama:
"America does not have a government "by the people"
The United States of America is not, in fact, a true democracy. In a democracy, the people are the government. Today, we elect people to run the government for us. The people we elect do not, for the most part, run the country in the interest of the people; they run it in the interest of themselves. We are led to believe that we must put our trust in these people. We, the People, do not have the power to create laws in our interest. This causes an imbalance of power in the government.
The powerful elites who control our government will self-servingly argue that the People are not qualified or do not know enough to be trusted to make laws. To counter those opposed to empowering the People, one needs only look to the record of the last 100 years in the 24 states where the People make laws by initiative. In those states, the People have legislated responsibly, and many times more so than their elected represen tatives. Civil service, campaign finance reform, and women's right to vote are but a few examples of the progressive legislation initiated by the People.
The experience of Switzerland is even more instructive. Switzerland, a poor, multi-ethnic, multi-lingual, hardscrabble country without natural resources decided, 140 years ago, to adopt a constitution that brought the People into the operation of government as lawmakers. Even Alexis de Tocqueville had serious doubts that this Swiss experiment in direct democracy would work. The result is without precedent in human history; Switzerland has evolved into the most successfully governed nation in the world."
Click here to add your name:
http://signon.org/sign/let-the-people-decide?source=c.fwd&r_by=72355
I had to stop halfway through this, as my mind conjured a pretty good concept for Saturday Night Live.
Obama has heads of various departments enter the Oval Office.
"Report from the front lines on The War on Drugs?" Obama asks
Response: "We believe there are a number of Al Queda insurgents involved, and..."
"No need to say more. Keep up the good work, and report back to me in one month's time."
"Report from The Class War?" Obama asks
Response: "According to The Gini co-efficient, everything is advancing quite nicely."
Obama: "Fine work. Get back to me with an update in six months. Next up, what's the prognosis on the War on Women?"
Response: "Well, the Right Judges are mostly in place. We've got druggists opting out of providing contraceptives thanks to the ruling that allows them to act on their consciences; and of course, abortion is practically a by-gone issue."
Obama: "Good work! Any news on The Class War?"
Response: "Incarceration rates are way up! Although we suspect it ties in with suspects from the War on Drugs!"
Obama: "Statistics on drug use?"
Response: "Pretty high there; you could say it's still a problem."
Obama: "No worries mate, it's only been several decades, and this monster is tough to tame. Almost as tough as taming, or should I say vanquishing terrorism."
Anonymous voice: "Don't you want an update on the War on Civil Liberties?"
Obama: "Did I endorse that one, too?"
I offer this parody to suggest that there are well over 5-6 wars underway...
There's also the biggest one of all: the corporate capitalism without conscience's war on NATURE... in a show of ecocide so grand, that ecosystems of every sort are simultaneously collapsing. We are its unwitting enablers.
So support our Troops... that'll save us. Sure.
Siouxrose, it's funny because it's true. :(
Good article and comments, especially amplifying Englehardt's analysis to include the "War on Drugs" and the unspoken class war of attritition on ordinary unprivileged citizens prosecuted vigorously by the present maladministration and the two-headed partisan snake of the Amerikan political duopoly.
FWIW, my 2:46pm comment to yesterday's "Siamese Twins Sharing the Same Brain: How the Military and the Civilian Are Blurring in Washington" by William Astore* is relevant to the present article and discussion.
* http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/06/14-6
"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist."
President Dwight D. Eisenhower
Truman dropped the atom bomb on Japan, Kennedy was ready to start a nuclear war over Cuba, Lyndon Johnson sent millions to their deaths in Vietnam for a war he didn't even believe could be won and Obama now has America engaged in 6 wars so I think it is obvious that when democrats say the republicans are the war party they are only telling a half-truth because both parties are true believers in mass slaughters for no good reason. It is an important part of American culture to hate and kill non-christian foreigners.
Thalidimide: Before making that false allegation about Kennedy, you should read the Douglass book: JFK & The Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters. Popular conjecture does not always align with the truth.
Thanks: O.S. You should hear my "Jesus is my co-pilot" skit.
If only the USA would declare war on 'intelligence'. Given their 'success' at fighting terrorism, poverty and drugs, it would be a very good thing for the US and the rest of the world should the USA actually declare war on 'smarts'.
They already did, an undeclared war almost won. Check out statistics on how American high school and college students rate when it comes to finding Iraq on a map or - even sadder - trying to find the U.S. on a map. Or just walk up to any American on the street and ask him what the Bill of Rights is. Or ask him what habeas corpus is (was). Or ask him which country the 9/11 hijackers predominantly came from. Or the best question of all, ask him if he is going to vote Democrat in 2012, and why.
I could go on and on.Intelligence? Pfft. That war has been lost.
“where sovereignty is irrelevant, armies tangential, and decisions are secret,”
Sounds like the Mother of all Gestapo operations to me. The Hydra affflicting the planet has so many heads it's hard to determine which one to lop off first.
I agree that we must count the "war on drugs," but let's make it clear that it is a real war in foreign countries. We have bases in Colombia and our fight against the guerillas in Colombia could turn into a war with Venezuela anytime.
We also need to count the occupation of Palestine, since Israel is our client state.
Finally we are in a cold war with Iran.
Article and comments lack solutions. I'm drowning in analysis. Sick to death of it.
no more wars
http://tinyurl.com/68j3tsy
Tzar Nicholas lost his country with only one failed war.
Everyone would like an honest government. Now picture in your mind that we awake tomorrow morning and every criminal in the government has been removed. What would be the result for America. We could not survive and we can't take them out a few at a time because their replacements would be trained to be as crooked as they are today. America as we once knew it is gone and will not return. From the president of the United States to the dog catcher who allows animals to starve thereby saving some money that he can steal for himself we have become a corrupt nation. The US was always a lost soul country but there was a time when it held great promise for the future but sadly that time has long passed beyond the point of no return. Even as our future becomes even more bleak we still fall for the terrorists are coming lies used to destroy our freedom. The empire country is crumbling and that fact will never ever change no matter how many foreign wars keep on piling up.
Today I read an aphorism by George Orwell: "the quickest way to end a war is by losing it". Obviously neither Bush nor Obama have read this.
*How much longer will it continue to abide provocations in Xinjiang and other Chinese interests from Central Asia, to Pakistan, to Africa? *
http://tinyurl.com/mumupz
War, as the USA now wages it, does not have traditional victory as a goal. The goal appears to be to merely cripple one's enemy, and then place a sufficient number of occupying troops in occupation so as to let insurgency and counterinsurgency rage upon the wounded body of the victim nation like gangrene. The USA does not make war with any intent that the war should ever end. This is new and distinct period in the History of War. So the goal is make of one's enemies permenent failed states, and to make of the USA not so much as a traditional empire, but rather a gangster state. I have no idea where this is heading.
Nope, more like false hope and chump change. Sad, ain't it?
Do we really believe any of this will change until the US of A is simply unable to do these things?
The fall may be long in coming, but when it comes, it will be a long fall.
six wars ?
u aint seen nuthin yet
http://tinyurl.com/2bsctn8
June 18, 2911
http://www.alternet.org/world/151291/the_militarization_of_america%3A_how_the_military_mindset_is_permeating_our_political_culture_and_society/comments/
College graduates are choosing the military as an alternative career choice to unemployment or stark debt ridden and bargain basement exploitation in the new "ownership" economy. The future is privatized. The new professional military (not counting private corporate mercenaries building up market violence and protection as a corporatist enforcement domain) has been growing an entire generation of Americans under the banner of unquestioned "patriotism" as equivalent to a Hollywood version of righteous Rambo fanaticism. At this time any discussion of violence as "politics by other means" (to play on the earlier phrase of politics as "war by other means") is tantamount to virtual anti-patriotism by default. The idea that we must support our military has blended with the acceptance of "collateral damages," "civilian casualties," and the normalization of National Interests as a virtual license to kill, maim, and even torture in the name of freedom (and often now simply in the name of American interests alone). Corporate America trumps democracy and conscience in this regard, while the political agenda has emerged as a shadow world of the intelligence networks that fabricate the Domestic narrative and insidiously bring foreign suppression into our own borders as National Security forces and measures.
Duty to country has been confused with public service and romanticized as a nationalistic heroism. We are compelled to reinforce the military conditioning of our own children to serve, even as we protest against extended wars that are poorly justified (at best) and have become the convenient measure of capturing foreign policy hegemony. We are trapped. Michelle Obama called the elite teams of Seals who finally ended the false drama of Bin Laden the "finest example of public service." Not "duty to country" as tradition would have it..., but "public service" as one might refer to the fireman or police officer in domestic society. But let's keep this in perspective and rational proportion. just a year ago there was concern over the revelations that Cheney and Rumsfeld had been organizing our elite soldiers into virtual death squads (aka: Central and South American kill squads come to mind?). The idea of assassination squads by Cheney and Rumsfeld was a contingent for concurrent policies under Obama to assassinate citizens without benefit of trial when deemed a threat by "authoritative" opinion. When will they bring this action home to our borders and act within our boundaries, one might ask? So what was considered death squads and assassination teams under Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld...has now emerged in a few short years to become "...the highest level of public service...".
This normalization has numbed the older generations but it has become an "enculturation" process for those born since then. it is beyond normal; seemingly almost "natural" in the strides of experiences they have been born into and conceive as cultural reality.Watch television shows, movies and commercials and you get a hint of the military consciousness pervading our media. Check out the new vehicles...tanks on wheels; sub-urbans show up in War movies and Cadillac has taken on the angles of a Stealth anti-radar military profile. It is all around us and in the language as well. The next generation will be economic hybreds of military boot camps. Already there are special privileges for military inducements that go beyond mere compensation for services to our veterans. In fact, even while the two tier system of military citiZen over the "unserving" (and therefore undeserving) citizen appearing in college opportunities and financial assistance awards and other niches of social value, but many of the actual Vets who have served the country are complaining that their benefits are actually being cut back and their needs ignored. It seems reasonable to assume the militarization incentives are aiming at recruitment and not at actual recognition. The questions are serious for those concerned about the insidious capture of our domestic democracy and the unscrupulous abuse of power in our increasingly secret power structure. Teach your children well ! Carlyle and Halliburton would like them to serve a new master. Don't let them get away with it now, or forever hold (give up) your peace !
CNBC recently took note of the economics-related war-games planned by the Pentagon, including the recent Unified Quest 2011, which will actually be looking at what happens domestically when the financial systems breakdown and how to handle the subsequent civil unrest.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232/?video=1653093678&play=1
If you look at Obama’s entire erratic policy grid of doublespeak compromises, it is not erratic at all. His message is based upon cognitive dissonance. His actions are entirely ONE PACKAGE. Everything actually delivered is not democratic at all, in fact it is hard right…even the gains are being turned back. Obama is succeeding where Bush failed. Social Security, first amendment rights for Corporations (unchallenged), Supreme Court dissent against the constitution; pension funds under attack; federal employees now being downsized with State Civil Service next; and the little discussed fact that small town America is bankrupt and struggling with the new “austerity” cuts without even the support that Wall Street receives with the big banks. Just as the big banks kept the monetary bailout at the top for themselves claiming “liquidity” as cure all, the corporate wealth is all being concentrated among the class structured elites. Apparently the “liquidity” cure is translated into a politically polluted “redistribution of wealth” when it comes to the lower 90% of the economy. We can only surmise that the top 10% is preparing a new Noah’s ark against a poverty flood that will wipe out all true liberty among Americans and have a domino impact on the rest of the world. The new “ownership” economy appears to be designing the new Imperial Empire of Ruler’s economy. The path we are on is to crash the economy and anyone who doesn’t see that at this point is simply living in a false consciousness. Political suppression is initiated outside the country in foreign contexts where constitutional factors don’t intercede; and then they are brought insidiously into the domestic dynamics under pretexts of national security. Count the infractions! Do the math!
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/pentagon-has-been-war-gaming-for-economic-disaster-since-early-09/ ; (Quote:
“Army officials met outside Washington last week for a thought experiment about the implications of a large-scale economic breakdown that would force the Army to absorb significant funding cuts and prepare the service for an increased role in keeping domestic order amid civil unrest,” InsideDefense.com reported on the recent games.
The article says officials chose the global financial collapse scenario because “it was deemed a plausible course of events given the current global security environment.”
“In such a future,” it reports, “the United States would be broke, causing a domino effect that would push economies across the globe into chaos.”
The latest game included a grim outlook: cuts in defense and international relations, fragmentation of power, and consolidation of “common functions, like logistics, training, medical services and information systems.”
But there was one “sliver lining” according to the article: “The Army would have an influx of qualified recruits as the result of an unemployment rate between 25 percent and 30 percent.” (end quote)
…And those “recruits” will be your new enforcer …cold to Freedom, Liberty and Democracy as we understand it.