EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Obama Did It For the Money
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Renowned Scientist Stephen Hawking Joins Academic Boycott of Israel
Popular content
Today's Top News
False Flag Operation in Wisconsin's Open Primary
When Robert “Fighting Bob” LaFollette pushed for the creation of an open-primary system in Wisconsin, his intent was to weaken the power of political party bosses beholden to special interests, like the railroad barrons. A central tenet of the progressive movement, opening up the primaries allowed independent, progressive activists to advance their political causes.
In its purest form, an open-primary system means that anyone can vote in any primary, and anyone can run in any primary.
Wisconsin has arguably the most open primaries in the United States, of the 17 states that currently follow that system. Open primaries aren’t just part of a political system in the Badger State; they’re part of a Wisconsin tradition. It’s the kind of tradition that allowed marijuana rights activist Ben Masel to bring attention to his cause through campaigns for governor and for the U.S. Senate seat held by Herb Kohl.
That tradition is about to face its greatest challenge.
Top Wisconsin Republicans -- the head of the state party and Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald -- have publicly announced their plans to run spoiler candidates in Democratic primaries.
Stephan Thompson, executive director of the Republican Party of Wisconsin, said in a statement that the party advocates the practice to push back the recall election schedule “to ensure that Republican legislators have ample time to communicate with voters throughout their districts after the state budget is approved.”
Fitzgerald has echoed those reasons in his support, despite some apparent objection from candidates such as Rep. Dan Kapanke and Rep. Randy Hopper who denied any involvement in the spoiler efforts even though Fitzgerald claimed to have briefed all Republican candidates on the strategy.
False Flag Operation?During the Wisconsin protests against Walker's collective bargaining bill, Walker received an email from a Republican activist and Indiana prosecutor urging him to employ a "false flag operation" -- to pretend that he was injured or attacked by a "union thug" -- to discredit the unions. The prosecutor lost his job for recommending such a partisan stunt, but the Wisconsin GOP has apparently not learned its lesson.
“To run a sort of fake candidate, a puppet candidate, just to cause a primary to delay an election by a month. I’ve never seen that done,” said Barry Burden, a campaigns and elections expert and political science professor at University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Burden explained that open primaries not only allow flexibility for candidates, but also for voters, who can vote in primaries regardless of party affiliation.
“I think politics in Wisconsin is salient enough right now and there’s enough energy around these recall elections and the law is permissive … I would not be surprised to see a fair amount of this crossover voting going on,” Burden said.
Taking the High RoadWhile Wisconsin voters may cross over and vote in another party's primary, Wisconsin Democrats have decided to take the high road and run real candidates for real offices. Wisconsin Democrats announced they will not run fake candidates in Republican primaries, despite encouragement from the We Are Wisconsin PAC to do just that.
"We cannot and will not stoop to the Republicans' level by encouraging candidates to lie about their party affiliation, or recommending that people try to deceive voters. We never have done that, and won’t start now. This is something that every single one of our six challengers has said they adamantly oppose,” said Democratic Party of Wisconsin Chairman Mike Tate in a statement.
Tate explained that the party will force primaries in the six recalls of Republican senators by running two Democratic candidates, one of whom will be a “placeholder.” This would not only bring consistency and predictability to the election schedule, but it would give the Democrats greater control of their ballot line.
Government Accountability Board (GAB) spokesman Reid Magney said there is nothing illegal that the GAB is aware of regarding protest candidates.
While legality may not be an issue, this Republican-driven strategy is completely at odds with the Wisconsin tradition that supports it. Open primaries were established as a progressive effort to weaken the power of political parties. Never before has a party attempted to manipulate that system in such an organized fashion.
Weapons of Mass Deception?“We’ve always had exceptionally open politics, and now that’s being taken advantage of,” said John Nichols, associate editor of the Capital Times and Washington correspondent for The Nation.
Nichols compared the strategy to the development of a new weapon. Once one side develops a weapon, the other will use it. This could lead to a political environment in which “nuisance candidates” are a common occurrence.
This kind of political climate is nothing but confusing for voters, who are already subjected to the confusing process of recall elections.
For that confusion to come directly from an organized political party is completely inappropriate, Nichols said, adding that it leads to a “heightened level of confusion that’s bad for democracy.”
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


9 Comments so far
Show AllIf anyone thinks this is the first time primaries have been poisoned, they need to get out more. In every state with open primaries, except apparently Wisconsin, people have turned out to poison the well for those they dislike.
Usually it seems to be the GOP who have an unopposed candidate and are therefore free to 'cross over' and vote for a no-hoper to be the Dem candidate.
If the quest is for social equality and civil unity in the service and promotion of a fair, just and responsible government intended to advance all humanity, better society and evolve civilization, then political parties are abominations.
Political parties, like institutionalized religions, become purveyors and promoters of separatist ideologies whereby one specific group of humans presume some ordained superiority over others considered lessor. Often (always in the case of political parties) these groups then seek to impose their will and assume authority over the natural rights, will and reason of all others.
It may be cliche and so worn out as to seem meaningless when said, but this is the divide and conquer stratagem plain and simple.
The core idea in separating religion and state is to not permit government to foist upon the individual a particular opinion or doctrine or conquest of conscious. So how are political parties different then religion in this effect?
What amazes is how such political dirty tricks and self-serving agendas as discussed in this article aren't obvious as evidence of our devolution as a nation.
voting is a con...
When Democrats had a weak candidate not expected to win the general election, they would sometimes vote in the Republican primary in favor of the more liberal candidate which tended to upset the more right leaning party leadership. The win by that more liberal Republican in the general election meant the election of a person who was more representative of the majority of all voters rather than a right wing minority.
Just what is "confusing" about the "process of recall elections"? You go to your local polling place and vote, correct?
Has anybody actually followed the financing of these organizations and if so do they lead outside of the United States? How is election reform possible without further power to the State? Is there any declaration being asked by competitors to state for the record that they are not involved in these kinds of tactics by association or leadership?
Unfortunately, the voter fraud / count fraud issue was never adequately addressed and this leaves us with no real leadership. Wisconsin can secede and establish its own voting republic rules with its own printed money and laws which the Federal imposition must respect.
But the budget conscious republicans never bring up the cost of what these needless primary elections will cost the Wisconsin taxpayers.
I think the process is very confusing, and I've been following politics for 50 years. This article is a good first step; there needs to be a lot of voter information distributed and plenty of media advertising with the straight talk about who's being recalled and why (that's where most of the information has come out so far) , and who's running to replace them and why (very murky and unclear so far, Democratic party has a lot of work to do) to make it clear to voters).
Obama was the spoiler candidate.
http://whatinthefuckhasobamadonesofar.com/
So were Bill & Hillary and Edwards and most other front running candidates.
The only real change could have come from Kucinich or Ron Paul.
Democratic voters have been duped over and over again.