EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Webb's Parting Shots
To get elected to the Senate, you have to meet certain requirements. You have to be at least 30 years old, a U.S. citizen for nine years, and a resident of the state you represent. Based on Jim Webb's recent performance, I would like to propose a fourth requirement: you have to be a novelist. If we had 100 novelists in the Senate, the body might finally be able, like Webb, to distinguish fact from fiction.
Webb, a Virginia Democrat who has published six novels, announced in February that he wouldn't run for a second term in the Senate. Never a reticent fellow, he has spent the last few months being even more outspoken than usual. On Afghanistan, East Asian security policy, and Libya, Webb has challenged the fictions of the Obama administration. It's refreshing to hear a critical voice in a body characterized these days by compliant Democrats and posturing Republicans.
Consider Webb's views on the use of military force. Last week, he teamed up with Republican Bob Corker of Tennessee to introduce a resolution calling on the president to justify its military actions in Libya. The administration, according to the War Powers Act, must report to Congress 60 days after initiating a military conflict. More than 80 days have passed since the initial attacks in Libya.
The president has argued that he has abided by the War Powers Act by consulting with Congress. In a stinging speech last week, Webb firmly disagreed: "The president followed no clear historical standard when he unilaterally decided to use force in Libya. Once this action continued beyond his definition of 'days, not weeks' he did not seek the approval of Congress. And while he has discussed this matter with some members of Congress, he clearly has not formally conferred with the legislative branch."
Webb is not just concerned about Libya. He takes issue with the administration’s overall approach to the use of force. “You can’t have 535 commanders in chief," Webb told Politico. "But at the same time, we have become — over the past 10 or 11 years — very blasé about the use of military force around the world. I never thought we would be so blasé as a nation in terms of where we’re going in and dropping bombs and doing these sorts of things."
Equally contrarian has been Webb's position on U.S. force structure in Asia. In mid-May, he teamed up with Carl Levin (D-MI) and John McCain (R-AZ) to issue a statement offering an alternative to the current U.S. plan to build another military base in Okinawa and expand the existing facilities on Guam. The Obama administration has been so hell-bent on creating another U.S. base on Okinawa, over the objections of the vast majority of the citizens of the Japanese island, that it went so far as to precipitate the resignation of Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama when he had the temerity to balk at the economic and political costs.
At a time when the administration has asked the Pentagon to contribute to overall budget cutting, the price tag for the reorganization of U.S. force structure in the Pacific is both enormous (over $27 billion) and, according to a recent GAO report, consistently underestimated. Webb's alternative – moving capabilities from the aging Futenma Marine air base to the nearby Kadena Air Force base – is not ideal, but it's at least a starting point for discussion. But the Obama administration, which has prided itself on its ability to listen, has closed its ears both to Okinawans and the Webb-Levin-McCain initiative.
Then there's Afghanistan. Webb is no pacifist. He did his tour of duty in Vietnam and subsequently supported U.S. involvement in various conflicts. But he centered his campaign for the Senate on opposition to the war in Iraq and famously butted heads with George W. Bush over his son's deployment in that war. Webb's relatively cautious statements about the war in Afghanistan drew ire from his anti-war supporters as recently as three months ago.
Webb is still cautious, essentially backing the administration's timeline. But in his recent questioning at Ryan Crocker's confirmation hearing to be the new U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, Webb wondered aloud whether the "clear and secure" strategy the United States is using in Afghanistan has any real effect on an adversary that can pick up and move quickly to another part of the country (or cross a border into another country). And he received a good amount of press for pointing out that "if there is any nation in the world that needs nation-building right now, it is the United States."
(If you agree with Webb, send a message to your elected representative by taking this poll on budget priorities sponsored by the New Priorities Network.)
Next month, the administration will announce the size of its initial troop withdrawal from Afghanistan. It's likely to be modest. But congressional opposition to the war is increasing alongside public opposition. Webb, who will be a free agent after this year, can and should take the lead in the Senate in pushing for a faster withdrawal from the country.
As Webb finishes out his term, he is up against another public official who's taking his leave: Robert Gates. The Pentagon chief, who has taken some bold positions in the past in opposing certain expensive weapons systems, is spending his final days in office fighting a rearguard battle. He has dismissed the idea of a substantial withdrawal from Afghanistan. He has chided European allies for cutting their military budgets. And he has warned of the dangers of the United States making its own deep reductions in Pentagon spending.
While Gates is spreading his soothing fictions, Webb is raising some uncomfortable facts. The Senate will be the poorer for his absence. If Obama manages to eke out a second term, perhaps Webb could return as the head of the Pentagon to preside over the end of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and a true dismantling of the military-industrial complex.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


11 Comments so far
Show AllLet's get a few things straight. Webb was a Reagan Democrat all along and yeah, he still has the knack to play suckup with the GOP. The only reason he chose not to run for another term is he was barely lucky in 2006 and that year was the first of the landslide victory election years for Democrats. Webb could have tried being a working class liberal populist but he was weak at best and only became that when the Republicans suddenly pretended to be on the side of the working class and pro-peace folks. Trust me, Webb won't be missed. Hampton Roads is already out of his reach and even Northern Virginia can't help him much. I don't expect the Democrats to win anything in VA this coming November or November 2012 either.
"Webb is no pacifist."
What's wrong with being a pacifist?
On this point we agree.
The rhetorical use of "pacifist" as a pejorative always sticks in my craw.
It's code for "pathetic and/or contemptible dreamer", or simply "fool".
It's a way of affirming that the writer or speaker buys into the reasonable, sensible, practical majority view that of course, war and mass violence and destruction must be accepted and condoned as necessary and inevitable.
'...a true dismantling of the military-industrial complex.'
Yes, indeedy. We'll see that the VERY SECOND hell freezes over. With all respect, Mr Feffer, it is always quaintly amusing, charming, and alarming in its delusional character when well-intentioned liberal or left-leaning folks talk of such things as accomplishing the dismantling of the MIC as though it would ever happen in the psycho fuck-up of a country that is the U.S. without major bloodshed. I don't really criticise, Mr Feffer - I think your article's quite incisive, and I fully admire and support (pretty much) Webb - one of the extremely few people in that shithole called Washington, D.C. with a spine. And perhaps you were just being facetious about Webb returning as head of the Pentagon and all that - I can see that.
I'm firmly of the mind, though, that the unfortunate, anti-intellectual, anti-democratic, anti-human and fairly universal philistine nature of the 'discourse' and certainly the politician class means that there'll be open warfare in the streets before the politicos, the money-changers, the profiteers, the parasites, the testosterone-poisoned little boys who think all of life and certainly the American identity and meaning of life is all about cock size and 'whuppin' ass' roll over and accept defeat at the hands of the enlightened, the evolved. Or, as Ken Wilber makes no bones about in his 'A Brief History of Everything' - the male imperative: fucking and killing, and not necessarily in that order.
No, this MIC will not be gotten rid of so easily. Doing so will likely entail the destruction of the country. And perhaps it's high bloody time for that.
True, true. And what is also true is that the decent into despond that the US is experiencing seems to be accelerating and will be pushed even more when, in the fashion of the bipolar US voting public, the Virginians send a fresh class of teabagging, psychopath Republicans to Washington in 2011. Obama was our last hope and has become our nightmare. I wonder why Webb is leaving.
Last time I checked there were plenty of female politicos, money-changers, profiteers, and parasites engaged in your testosterone-poisoned sex-death romp. It doesn't take a cock to be a war criminal. "Male imperative," give me a break. Psychos come in both flavors.
I love this site. Great comments max, ez,OS and Tara Stone.
Webb is one of the dozen or so members of congress I regard highly. There sure aren't many in those hollow(not hallow) halls, those others are out looking for the bribe money, quaintly called lobbying dollars.
all wars begin with false flags....911 being the most recent. Until we waterboard the bastards who took us into these wars the MSM will repeat the LIES OF THE MIC
"if there is any nation in the world that needs nation-building right now, it is the United States."
BINGO!
"Until we waterboard the bastards who took us into these wars the MSM will repeat the LIES OF THE MIC" -- Well, perhaps, but for sure until we get beyond the "Let's get a few things straight" response to those who are deemed to be insufficiently in accord with each of our wholly pure and purely absolute "lines" in their opposition to what we oppose, we are going to continue to enable what we all say we oppose.