Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Ending Rape in War
After curving through miles of Quebec’s countryside, the road to Montebello arrives at an enormous log cabin along the Ottawa River. Busloads of women pull up, from Rwanda, Colombia, the Congo, Mexico, Bosnia, Burma—women who think they can change the world.
The plan isn’t to change the whole world. Just the most violent and despicable parts, parts that many of them—too many—have experienced firsthand. They carry with them experiences they seek to erase forever, if not from history, at least from any possible future.
On the grounds of this turn-of-the century resort that usually hosts heads of state and leaders of industry, more than 100 women from all over the world gathered in late May to make a joint commitment to end sexual violence in war. A safe place, with food and fellowship, allowed many to share tragic accounts of their own rape. These women did not come as victims, but as leaders in an international movement to bring the criminals to justice, repair damaged lives and societies and, most of all, prevent the use of women’s bodies as battlegrounds in conflicts.
Although estimates vary, the statistics are overwhelming: half a million women raped in Rwanda, 64,000 in Sierra Leone, some 40,000 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, nearly two million in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), untold thousands in other parts of the world.
“Numbers are numbing,” warns Jody Williams, one of the women Nobel Peace Prize Laureates who organized the meeting. “There are women in here who have experienced sexual violence in conflict.” Many nod. Throughout the four-day event, participants, including Jody, will tell their stories. Because of their strength and commitment, the women’s testimonies do not end with the horror of their suffering. Instead, they serve as the prelude to detailed descriptions of how each one is organizing against sexual violence in their countries and in international forums to create a world in which no woman suffers what they and their countrywomen have suffered.
Calculated Strategy
The use of sexual violence against women to submit, terrorize, and dominate entire populations is, in the 21st century, common in many parts of the world. International law has only begun to recognize and codify the fact that sexual violence is not a byproduct of war or an uncontrolled act by rogue soldiers, but a war crime committed against women, against races and sectors of society, and against humanity. It is also a calculated strategy of war.
Three Nobel Prize winners open the meeting to define terms and describe the task at hand. Jody Williams won the prize after organizing a successful international campaign to ban landmines, Shirin Ebadi was recognized for her work as a defender of human rights and particularly women’s rights in Iran, and Mairead Maguire formed an organization to bring peace in Northern Ireland. Wangari Maathai of Kenya and Aung San Suu Kyi of Burma sent taped messages of support. Their organization, the Nobel Women’s Initiative, aims to use the prestige of the prize to bring attention to, and fortify, women’s rights movements throughout the world. They convened the May meeting to share experiences and strategies and begin to design internationally coordinated actions to end rape in war, punish perpetrators, and heal survivors and their communities.
War is by definition violence—violence against women, men, children, the environment. Genocidal campaigns and militarism are universally reprehensible. Why the gender-based focus?
Williams put the effort in context. “This is not an attempt to make war safe for women.”
Maguire also emphasized that fighting sexual violence in war goes beyond the focus on rape and requires a commitment to say, “No to war, no to militarism, no to killing. Yes to peace, yes to conflict resolution, yes to non-violent peacekeepers, yes to human dignity, human rights and justice.”
Using International Mechanisms
The goal of ending sexual violence in conflicts first focuses on making the problem visible and then on building societies that quickly condemn and stop what have been referred to as “epidemics” of rape in conflicts. It also relies on creating and implementing international law such as Security Council Resolutions 1820, 1888, and 1690 that “demand for the complete cessation with immediate effect by all parties to armed conflict of all acts of sexual violence,” among other mandates.
Joanne Sandler, deputy director of UN Women, the UN entity charged with gender equality, noted that the UN system has advanced in recognizing rape in war as a specific international crime. She noted four reasons for a women-led civil society effort: to identify where sexual violence in conflict exists but has not yet surfaced, to go beyond legal mechanisms that exclusively address rape in specific situations, to increase monitoring and press for justice, and to build survivor-centered responses that place women’s rights in the center of peace talks.
The conference brought together a wide range of women activists, including survivors, service providers, representatives of security sectors, legal experts, and movement builders. Participants found common ground in their solidarity, empathy, and commitment to do something. Beyond that, the differences posed challenges and enriched discussions. For example, some conflicts involving widespread sexual violence have been formally recognized and perpetrators are being tried in international court, such as the genocidal campaigns in Africa and in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Others, including Latin American drug wars and post-coup Honduras, have not been recognized and the use of sexual violence to undermine opposition remains beneath the radar of the international community. Others involve specific outbursts, such as the post-electoral violence in Kenya in 2008. Some involve state actors, others non-state actors, and most a combination of the two.
The backdrop for the violence in all cases is impunity, the lack of justice, and a patriarchal system that enables the treatment of women as tools of conquest and rape as a weapon of war.
Tears and Songs
At this gathering, hope and horror walk hand in hand.
In working groups, at meals and on long walks in the Quebec forests, women from 30 countries talked about their own experiences and their efforts to treat and prevent sexual violence. Many rape survivors have become international leaders through their efforts to help others. Although they’ve told their stories many times before, that doesn’t prevent the tears from flowing as they recall, yet again, the attacks that changed their lives.
Rose Mapendo is a survivor of the massacre in the DRC in 1998. A member of the Tutsi ethnic group, she was forced into hiding with her seven children, but police discovered the group. Her husband was killed and soldiers took her and her children to a death camp where she gave birth to twins. A U.S. team rescued her family from the camp, and Rose now lives with her children in Phoenix. Today she works to support resettlement and refugees. The rape crisis in her country continues. When she speaks to us about her work and experience, she combines tears and song.
Godelieve Mukasarasi works in Rwanda with women survivors of the 1994 genocide. Her organization SEVOTA helps women rape victims with HIV-AIDS and carries out courses in reconciling women with their children born of rape. Many women reject these children. As we speak, she begins to tap my face, my arms and shoulders lightly. The translator for our conversation explains that she is demonstrating part of the therapy she uses to break down the pain and resentment in these women. Armed groups killed Godelieve’s husband and daughter in the violence that left nearly a million ethnic Tutsis dead.
The last story I heard before heading home came from Bakira Hasecic. A Bosniak (Bosnian Muslim) from Visegrad, she and her daughter were repeatedly raped by Serbian forces; her sister was raped and killed and her house converted into a rape center.
Hasecic is, in a word, implacable. She says she will not rest until every person responsible is brought to justice. Many of them are neighbors who have returned to the town.
On the top of her list is accused war criminal Ratko Mladic. Mladic, a general of the Bosnian Serb army, had been in hiding for 16 years, thought to be protected in Serbia. Hasecic’s steely blue eyes show her determination to see him and the others punished for their crimes. Her erect posture reflects her military training — she and her daughter joined the Visegrad Forces of Territorial Defense following the rapes.
In the Montreal airport that same day, a television screen flashes the news that Serbian police had finally apprehended Mladic. I imagine Bakira’s reaction. She will not smile. She will sternly cross him off her list and continue to seek punishment for him and the rest.
From Reaction to Action
The survivors’ stories bring the issue into the heart; the strategy discussions bring it to the table. Most of us have more questions than answers: A reporter asks what do you do when your local audience tires of interviews with rape survivors and the problem just keeps getting worse? How do you simultaneously confront the need for reconciliation and the desire for justice for offenders in communities? How do we overcome the obstacles and limitations of legal processes?
All the participants had experiences and knowledge to share and the brainstorming resulted in a wide range of proposals. Implementation will depend on the alliances forged and the follow-up by each of the participants. Every woman at the conference struggles for peace, within themselves, their communities and their nations.
It’s the combination of these efforts and daily acts of courage that will form the foundation for “women forging a new security,” in the words of the organizers. Although the gathering didn't come up with a definitive solution to the huge challenge of ending rape in war, we left with the strength of collective effort and deep commitment. Each woman made personal commitments to continue toward the common goal—difficult but not impossible—of ending sexual violence in armed conflicts throughout the world.

25 Comments so far
Show AllConsider this. If War could be generally ended (that is what the UN was supposed to be about, wasn't it) there would be no rape in war. I'm not trying to be a smart ass here, I am just overwhelmed by trying to comprehend how so interconnected the "fleurs du mal" on this our Earth really are.
War is rape.
War is the ultimate obscenity and rape will always be a part of it. War is always about greed, always. I'm 61 years old and this country has always, in my lifetime, been at war. I'm so sick of it. I am so sick of our fascist "leaders". God damn it all.
You took my comment. Your brevity speaks louder than an essay.. Well said.
"Maguire also emphasized that fighting sexual violence in war goes beyond the focus on rape and requires a commitment to say, “No to war, no to militarism, no to killing. Yes to peace, yes to conflict resolution, yes to non-violent peacekeepers, yes to human dignity, human rights and justice.”
I'm with the other comments here. This rape is a symptom of war and the thinking that generates wars. Get rid of that thinking/wars and rape as a weapon on a mass level goes away. That would leave us free to focus on the individual and social systemic causes of violence against the weak.
Like others here, and while having empathy for those victims of rape in wars, the two can not be separated.
War is the infliction of violence upon the body of another. War is enforcing ones power over another via brute force. So too is rape.
When we have men shooting each other with guns, chopping one another to bits with machetes, dropping napalm on people from aircraft . blowing of the limbs of children and women with cluster munitions then as others have stated War IS rape. They are part of the same thing.
It is like suggesting one removes speed from auto racing.
End war and rapes in war end.
End violence and rapes end.
" End war and rapes in war end. End violence and rapes end."
Very true, but we must take it a step further, connect one more dot. Our lifestyle depends on our ability to rape the planet which requires War. When we fill up our gas tanks, when we buy endless garbage, when eating becomes recreational, we are complicit in war, thus in rape.
From antiquity, rape has been used as an instrument of warfare. As long as mankind wages war, there will be rape and pillage. Nihil sub sole novum,
Like the other posters have commented, war is a package deal, rape is part of the package.
On Killing by LtCol Dave Grossman, 2009, Excerpts
Throughout history women have been the greatest single group of victims of this environment process. Women have been defiled, debased, and dehumanized for the aggrandizement of others. Rape is a very important part of the process of dominating and dehumanizing an enemy; and this process of mutual empowering and bonding at the expense of others is exactly what occurs during gang rapes. In war, empowerment and bonding through such gang rapes often occur on a national level.
Gang rapes and gang or cult killings in times or peace and war are not “senseless violence.” They are instead powerful acts of group bonding and criminal enabling that, quite often, have a hidden purpose of promoting the wealth, power, or vanity of a specific leader or cause at the expense of the innocent.
http://theformofmoney.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2010/3/3/4466522.html
All of the comments above are missing one point. PATRIARCHY! In a male dominated society....which is global...the object of violence is OVER/AGAINST women and children.
In a balanced society...where male/female are equal....the feminine would not be looked at as "lessor," "subordinate," or "object."
A more appropriate title for this article should read: "Ending Patriarchy."
What would the non-patriarchy version of war be like?
Would the men rape other men as well, or would they just shoot and torture the women like they do the men today?
Not far off matti. During the Bosnian war I was listening to a radio report that began something like this...."In the ditch are the bodies of three men who have obviously been sodomized: either before or after they were killed is hard to tell." Rape is war as well. And war is the grandest rape of all. Whether God or Karma or just plain pay-back it will be here. We have raped our way through history and we all have it coming.
I join the surprisingly harmonious chorus in previous comments.
The crime of rape, whether occurring as a spontaneous, individual "retail" act of individual violence or as a premediated tactic by professional fighters in the course of kinetic military actions, is heinous, evil, reprehensible and wrong.
But the headline "Ending Rape In War" founders on the same semantic irony seized upon by social-critic comedians, male and female, when "Women Organized Against Rape" was founded. (Later the "Organized" dropped out, ironically streamlining the organization's acronym to "WAR".)
It wasn't only jeering reactionary bigots who noticed that the title implied that there are women FOR rape. It presented a jarring disconnect, despite the deeper philosophical and psychological inquries into the problematic dynamics and implications of rape.
Neither the preceding commenters nor I seek to discredit, disparage, or criticize "anti-rape" activism. But if rape is truly about violence and control, not sex, it follows logically that war itself is the real problem.
War is the ultimate expression of brute force, barbaric power, and savage control. As long as it's a male-dominated, phallocentric enterprise, rape will remain a horrifically useful arrow in the warrior's quiver.
There's no practical way to appreciably reform or sanitize war by somehow modifying its most onerous, even diabolical, manifestations.
There's no question that we ought to end rape in war. And infanticide in war. And rampant despoiling in war. And starvation in war. And displaced, impoverished refugees in war. And all of the rest of the intolerable and unconscionable "collateral damage" in war.
By all means let us refine, reform, and improve war to such a humane and civilized degree that for all practical purposes, there's nothing left of it.
INANNA: I would say that MAMMON so far qualifies as the only one who "gets it."
I am as anti-war as anyone in this forum, yet to see otherwise intelligent persons like Net, Katrine & Durutix run shortshrift over this topic, by heading right into a generic outrage of war, appears insensitive, to say the least.
I guess unless and until it's YOUR legs pried apart, the sense of what so intimate a form of violation means will not become internalized.
As Mammon pointed out, war brings suffering to women in a disproportionate way. It's generally men who agree to war, invent, design, and sell its weapons, and then head the states that rely on war to do their elites' bidding.
Yes. War is the great evil, and aggressive war sited by The Geneva Conventions as the Supreme Crime. But let us not, in our haste to condemn war, show such a lack of regard for those whose bodies were violated in a most heinous way. Some of these women were raped with weapons, their pelvises pulverated*. Anyone care to try that on for size, empathetically? (*I take full advantage of poetic license on this one!)
Keep in mind that rape also exists quite apart from war! I notice the article makes no mention of those poor women still living in tents in Haiti. Sexual predators have become their nightly nightmare.
A recent article on C.D. also exposed the fact that women in America routinely know violence at the hands of their male partners.
To turn the topic exclusively to war, shows an absence of empathy for those who are victims of rape both on the battlefield, and beyond it. For those in this forum who are quick to speak about a class war, there's an eerie absence of understanding that for many women, there is also a war in progress against their gender.
Consider the lives of women in Afghanistan and other Arab lands.Life is much like a prison sentence when confined, for the most part to the home. Women are impeded from expressing any adult form of personal autonomy. And do not think that segments of America's "Christian Taliban" do not want similar inroads to ensue, wherein they would deny women all sorts of autonomous rights... while seeking to convince them this cruelty constitutes God's will!
I have seldom seen a thread on the topic of violence to women that did not become a discussion of peripheral subjects. Whether this deflection device is used to turn away from the ugliness revealed by this morally repugnant abyss, or a sinister means to minimize the topic, itself, is difficult to determine.
Recently I pointed out that having done a bit of ad hoc research based on observing responses to articles specifically detailing (or relating to) women's issues/concerns, that there were always less than 11 responses, and many of these were tangential discussion points that had NOTHING to do with the subject under consideration.
The dearth of regard indicated by these responses (or lack of same) says something about the sexism so many in this forum think they have transcended, but in fact have not.
If you think there's no need for consciousness-raising on this topic, look no further.
Siouxrose,
Extremely and beautifully well said.
It seems even women do not comprehend that we live in a woman hating world! The Patriarchy and religion in particular....with the emphasis on a male God...is so entrenched in backlash against any form of female Divinity rising ever again, that they vehemently train children to treat "male" as God, "man" as God and "woman" as subservient. Even in the 21st Century the "Fathers" get all red faced and indignant to even the remotest suggestion that Divinity, the Divine, the Holy is both masculine and feminine. It is Yin/Yang. It is balance. It is both/and not either/or.
I speak the way I do because I have studied root causes of the womens issue. I am looking at the problem globally and all encompassing. Single issues are heinous, but even more heinous is the fact that this is a planet wide change that occurred in ancient history and is documented!!!
Feminism is not just for or about women! Feminism is a world view that includes equal regard for both women AND MEN. Does anyone understand how terrible it is for a little boy to grow up feeling like he is not a "real man?" He gets that idea because the male role models around him think they have to act like Paul Bunyan, GI Joe or John Wayne in order to be considered real men. Any sensitivity or gracefulness on the part of a boy....and his life is hell from then on! He is ridiculed, passed over for male bonding and any number of other things that make him feel inferior. As for a woman....many think they have to act like "real men" too, in order to make it in our world of business and corporate/political games. If we valued the feminine as much as the masculine....there would be NO WAR! No mother wants to send her child off to be cannon fodder! If she is brainwashed into thinking that real patriotism means "soldier" then it is sad indeed.
Siouxrose,
If you ask a man how violated he feels when someone sticks a gun in his face and takes his wallet, you would have thought he got raped. You add to that then opened your body cavity and got inside of your body!!! They actually freak out.
Rape during warfare is perpetrated not only by one combatant against another combatant or civilian population. At the current time within the professional all volunteer armed forces of the United States, rapes are being committed by American service-members against fellow service-members in epidemic proportions. These rapes include the rape of both male and female service members. Rape during war is not limited to the rape of women and children. .All of the service branches and the Department of Veteran Affairs have programs directed at victims of what they call military sexual trauma (MST). If you visit a VA clinic or VA medical center you will find that many of the women, and a substantial number of men, that are receiving psychological or psychiatric services are receiving treatment for military sexual trauma.
I'm afraid that the only consequence of the conference & similar initiatives will be to continue to give the Empire pretexts for invasions under the banner of 'humanitarian intervention' . . .
Walruses. Walruses? Nature's plan for a male walrus is to become what is called a Beach Master over a harem of females. He/it must survive constant violent challenge from other Beach Masters and younger males.
Eventually, a Beach Master walrus has the day it has been dreading. Unable to prevail this time - - it tries fleeing from the mob of younger males. As they conquer and pursue the defeated male - they sodomize it to death.
Sex and violence are wired together in cortical tissue back to time immemorial. Few people ever remember this verity.
Trylon