Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Jarring Disconnect: If Joblessness and Hopelessness Undermine Democracy in the Middle East, What About Here at Home?
In his latest speeches on the Middle East, President Obama, both at the State Department and at the G8 meeting in France, has pledged billions of dollars in economic aid to Middle Eastern countries, drawing a direct connection between the unrest and demonstrations that brought down the dictators in Tunisia and Egypt, and the joblessness and hopelessness felt by the young people in those two countries.
His adviser on international economics, David Lipton, has been more specific, saying that, “We believe that these two pillars go hand in hand. Without economic modernization, it will be hard for governments trying to democratize to show people that democracy delivers.”
Unemployment in Egypt among young men and women is about 30%. In Tunisia, it is over 40%. The White House claims that with figures like that, the future for democracy in those countries is tenuous.
But wait a minute. What about the US? Unemployment and underemployment here is still up around 20% overall, and it is much higher among young people. Black youth unemployment fell so far in 2011 to an official rate of 44% from 50% last year (because so many young workers just gave up trying to find work)! Among Latino youth, the official unemployment rate is stuck at around 30%. Overall, youth unemployment, according to the official Labor Department figures, is 20%, but remember, the official rate does not count those who are working part time who want full-time work, and does not count those who have given up looking for work. Among young people, it may be that many who work part-time (those who live at home or who are in school or college) actually are not looking for full-time work, so that upward adjustment may not be as great as for older workers, but at the same time, there are certainly more young people who give up looking for jobs than is the case with older workers who have families to support. In any event, it is clear that all these youth unemployment figures are actually too low by a significant amount.
If the official rate of unemployment for all Americans of 9% is actually less than half of the actual rate of 20%, then even if we took a conservative estimate, simply eliminating the adjustment of those working part-time who want full-time work from the youth unemployment figure, and just keeping the adjustment for those who have dropped out of the labor force (stopped looking for work) because it is fruitless, we would still see actual unemployment figures for young people in the US at staggering Egypt-like levels: 30% for all young people, 45% for young Latinos, and as high as 66% for black youth!
So why is the president so concerned about providing economic support to boost jobs in countries like Tunisia and Egypt, in order to “support democracy,” while in here in the US, he has basically thrown in the towel on job creation efforts, and is just talking about cutting the deficit--a Republican theme?
Cutting the deficit, even as economists are increasingly warning that the so-called “recovery” is sputtering, is a recipe for even worse unemployment.
The answer can be found by looking at the way the young have reacted to joblessness in Egypt and Tunisia on the one hand, and in the US on the other.
In Egypt and Tunisia, they took to the streets and stood down police and soldiers, ultimately bringing down their governments.
Here in the US, young people, like their parents, are largely quiescent. Their reaction to the frustrations of joblessness tend to be either self-destructive (drugs and alcohol) or anti-social (gang activity or crime).
If they were to band together and take over city squares to demand action by government to give them jobs, to provide them with access to college funding, etc., they would get the same kind of attention and help from local and state governments and from the White House and Congress that Egyptian and Tunisian youth are getting from the G8 countries.
Sure, they’d have to face down police armed with tear gas and batons, just like their compatriots in Tunisia and Egypt had to do, but once aroused, motivated and organized, young people have the stamina and courage to do that.
What is lacking is any real effort to organize these frustrated and angry young people, and to get them out into the street. The traditional groups that would have done this in the past--the labor movement, civil rights organizations, and political groups on the left--have been somehow neutered. Their focus, such as it is, is on now on elections, on recall campaigns, and on the coming 2012 presidential contest. It is not on organizing unemployed young people.
Expecting the White House to act on this crisis of long-term joblessness and diminished expectations for the future among young workers is foolish. The Obama administration knows what the problem is. It just doesn’t care.
As an “unnamed White House official” put it at a press briefing recently,
“I think it’s important to note that the political movements of nonviolent protests that we’ve seen are rooted in part in a lack of opportunity in the region. You have very large populations of young people, many of whom -- too many of whom cannot find a job. You have a history not just of political rights being restricted but of economic corruption that has also frustrated opportunity.
“So we think it’s important to note that some of the protests in the region are deeply rooted in a lack of individual opportunity and economic growth, as well as a suppression of political rights.
“We also know from our study of the past that successful transitions to democracy depend in part on strong foundations for prosperity, and that reinforcing economic growth is an important way of reinforcing a democratic transition.”
That analysis clearly applies equally to the impoverished inner cities of the US, and indeed increasingly to the entire population of young Americans, who are seeing national policies, state policies and corporate lobbying -- all focused on cutting taxes and boosting corporate profits -- rob them of their futures.
And so it will be, unless and until the youth of America do what Bob Marley long ago advised: “Get up, stand up, stand up for their rights.”
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



50 Comments so far
Show AllBefore General Marshall left for Europe to implement his excellent plan for recovery after World War II, he warned the U.S. that unless the plan included a strong and generous safety net -- food, housing, education, employment -- European governments could expect rioting in the streets.
Democratic Socialism was thus born and helped create prosperous, peaceful and even happy populations. We seem to have lost our memory of how government can really work well for everyone instead of a favored few.
We haven't lost our memory. The facts about government-run safety net programs have been systematically denied to United Staters. What the rich faction of the right wing believes and has brainwashed the Tea Partiers to also believe, is that these programs will lead to regular folks confiscating the wealthy's wealth, so they foment the myth that government programs providing direct services of any kind are by definition inefficient and corrupt. When they get elected, they govern in a way that is inefficient and corrupt in order to prove their point, then blame the whole idea of government.
Actually, this suggests an idea. What if we called for rallies of all unemployed and underemployed people in a central location, in each metropolitan region. After all, it's not like the unemployed don't have the time. Unlike the culture war or antiwar rallies, the unemployment rallies would actually garner widespread public sympathy, since practically everybody has a friend or family member who is un or under employed. Further, the politicians of both parties would glom onto this, looking for any conceivable political advantage.
If we want to carry this conspiracy theory further, they then tighten up the border, discouraging European tourists and potential college students from bothering to try to come to the US, either to study or to visit, so there's nobody here to tell people in the US how much better life is in the welfare states of Europe.
Dave Lindorff
www.thiscantbehappening.net
The welfare states that so many Europeans are familiar with, and which is quite superior in so many ways to America's broken-down system, is described quite cogently in Steven Hill's extremely well written book Europe's Promise: Why the European Way Is the Best Hope In an Insecure Age.
It'll be interesting, Greece has stalled on Austerity talks and is under the gun from IMF to speed up privatizing their Civil services including their major ports and a state owned bank.
The new Conservative government states if they do as IMF demands they will never be able to recover their economy. Go Figure.
>^^<
Very smooth. One wonders if you are just as crude in person as you are on the Internet. Despite your less than lucid remarks, I have come to believe after reading Hill's book that the United States could benefit greatly from the social democratic forms of government [which, especially in a country like Germany, could hardly be described as corporate fascism] that are practiced in so many countries in Europe.
How many people do we allow to die for lack of medical treatment?? The daily traumatizing effect of selective, for-profit, American health care can not be minimized. I truly respect many of the European countries for not dealing death and destruction as pablum for their countrymen. Imagine the peace-of-mind. And time from slave working conditions to be able to adequately rest and expand interests? Why is our current lifestyle acceptable when other realities exist??
Today we allow hundreds everyday to suffer and die from lack of Medical treatment. The fatcats just want to increase that a bit to Tens of Thousands. as long as their bonuses continue to increase why should they care!?
>^^<
Conspiracy theory? What the heck are you talking about?
You are living in a fantasy land. I've lived in Europe (England and Darmstadt, Germany), and trust me, there is no war coming in Europe. You are clearly one of these people who think currency is destiny. No.
Europeans have had enough experience with war that they are not going to do that again for a looooong time.
Europeans have a much more civilized view of the role of the state as an equalizer, and an agency to alleviate the hardships of the less fortunate. Our country is content to allow forty million to live at near starvation levels of income, keeping them alive with Food Stamps. That is simply a sick society.
Europe also doesn't spend half its tax revenues on the military.
That's why they can have health care coverage for all, modern public transit, and vacations.
Dave Lindorff
www.thiscantbehappening.net
"Here in the US, young people, like their parents, are largely quiescent. Their reaction to the frustrations of joblessness tend to be either self-destructive (drugs and alcohol) or anti-social (gang activity or crime)."
... or media- induced fantasies and blaming others; or apathy and inaction.
But it appears to me that the youth of Egypt and Yemen weren't so much organized from without as successful in organizing themselves from within once they got together in the public squares.
Today's kids are so interconnected, they could pull this kind of thing off in a flash (good term--actually they've done it, with "flash mob" actions, but these are just anti-social blow-ups, instead of directed protests). If they had a little help and direction, they could really shake things up, given their connectivity skills.
Dave Lindorff
www.thiscantbehappening.net
Dave, I like your point here about what American youth have (connectivity skills) and what they don't have (a little help and direction). Seems to me that oldsters like you and me have failed to provide that help and direction, perhaps because so many of us have imbibed the kool-aid of Obama adoration and have come to see "kids" as but another "resource" to be mobilized for the perpetuation of the Democratic Party side of that corporate duopoly that keeps youngsters and others in deplorable economic conditions. What passes for "movement" activity in the U.S.A. today is largely an affair for old white men, and we've yet to find the means of establishing "connectivity"of youngsters not just with one another but with the problems of the society in which they live.
I'd say that acceptance of the Democrats (which I've seen as strongly correlated with age) is a significant portion of the problem.
I'd also say that another major portion of the problem is that a lot of older people who otherwise might provide some help, have been sucked into/diverted into a series of assumptions and movements that basically slam the door on everyone who came after them. I'm referring to the assumptions of generalized stupidity against younger people (as another poster demonstrated), or various politics of withdrawl-whether Christianized, like that of Parson Hedges, or just wishfully hoping that inner power will somehow solve people's problems, or just plain getting out and leaving people younger, browner, and poorer to face the problems that they couldn't deal with.
This connectivity and cable television kids are brain dead zombies. I know because I was a high school government teacher.
P.S. Read the book the dumbest generation ever for more insight on today's youth.
If gang-affected youth in the U.S.can risk their lives each day in the streets warring against each other, they can risk their well being (tear gas, tasers, rubber bullets, even police guns) enough to initiate a massive protest movement.
Perhaps with brave and radical direct actions informed by strategic non-violence (civil disobedience) they could even lead their less-than-brave elders into new territory?
If you are already willing to go to jail and willing to take a bullet for your "homies" how can you not be bold enough to lead a revolution?
IMAGINE the possibilities!!
>>If gang-affected youth in the U.S.can risk their lives each day in the streets warring against each other, they can risk their well being (tear gas, tasers, rubber bullets, even police guns) enough to initiate a massive protest movement.
Those gang members are aware of the risk/reward issue which shows how bad it has become.
What is risked versus what is gained in confronting the authorities on Jobs and a decent income is not seen as worth it/
Crime in fact pays much better. See wall street.
Too true. A young kid, friend of my younger son, whom we took in for a while when his own parents basically booted him out, visited here last week. Very intelligent, to the point of understanding the rigged game that we all face. He's been working two jobs, can't even repair his old junker of a car. Made the remark that making the honest buck is a lot harder than what he could do in the illegal trade.
We toked to that.
PENELOPE, you deserve that name.
IT IS USUALLY THEY WHO DO THE TORTURE, THE KILLING , THE THIEVING, THE HORROR, THE INHUMANITY & THE LIES.
MAKE NO MISTAKE, ❮THE NEW LAWS, ARE THE INVISIBLE ✠SIEGE✠ CORPORATIONS/GOVERNMENTS ARE PREPARING AGAINST THEIR OWN CITIZENS ❯
I LIKE YOUR IDEA ALL WE GOT TO DO IS SHOW UP AGAIN , AGAIN & AGAIN ,EXERCISE OUR RIGHTS WHATEVER LEFT OF THEM, A BUNCH OF QUESTIONS?????WE HAVE & IDEAS THAT DO NOT REQUIRE BLOOD SHED & EXPLOITATION.
TO ANSWER BRIEFLY EUROPE IS NOT THE PROMISED LAND, ATLANTIS OR NIRVANA, BUT BY FAR EDUCATION, HEALTH, SOCIAL CULTURAL & COMMUNICATION STRUCTURE ARE FAR BETTER, NOT TO MENTION THEY EAT FAR LESS KENTUCKY FRIED SHIT, JUST BY DOING SO THEY'RE LESS OBSESS.IN BOTH SENSE OF THE WORD.
THEY READ MORE, WATCH BETTER FILMS, THEY PUT NO FLAGS ON THEIR CARS & HOMES, THEY TRAVEL MORE, THE LIST GOES ON. NO, THERE ARE NO GENETIC PREDISPOSITIONS THAT FAVORS ONE OR THE OTHER.HAVING SAID THAT EUROPE TOO MUST SEARCH FOR AN OTHER ALTERNATIVE AND AVOID JUMPING ON THE TITANIC. REMEMBER ITS ONLY FEW HUNDRED YEARS SINCE EUROPE MOVED TO AMERICA, CAUSING UNFATHOMABLE HOLOCAUST TO THE INDIAN NATIONS.THAT'S AN OTHER STORY.
THE EMPIRE IS REPEATING THE SAME PATTERN, SOMEWHERE ELSE.
THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE CORPORATION HAVE A FAR MORE GRIP ON THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF AMERICAN CITIZENS THAN ANY OTHER COUNTRY ON EARTH.
THINGS COULD HAVE TAKEN AN EXTRAORDINARY & POSITIVE DENOUEMENT AFTER THE AWAKENING OF THE SIXTIES, IT WAS NOT MEANT TO BE, THE NEW WORLD ORDER THE NEO CONSERVATIVE, FUNDAMENTALISM,THE M I C & THE CORPORATIONS COMING TOGETHER OVERLAPPED EVERYTHING ELSE. THAT WAS STAGE TWO.SEPTEMBER 11 INITIATED STAGE THREE THE REST IS HISTORY.
HAVING SAID THAT IN AMERICA THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ONE STATE AND AN OTHER IS BEYOND BELIEF, IT IS ALMOST THE CASE OF TWO DIFFERENT NATIONS A WOMAN A MAN IN VERMOUTH, NEW YORK OR LA WOULD BE ABLE TO TALK HUMAN RIGHTS, POETRY, EAT HEALTHY, BUY AN ECO CAR & HAVE A FULFILLING JOB BE ACTIVE POLITICALLY & MAKE LOVE WITHOUT A MAGNUM UNDER THE MATTRESS, BE ASSERTIVE WITH A DEGREE OF HUMANITY & CREATIVITY.
ON THE OTHER HAND U WILL HAVE A GUY OR GIRD WHO WILL BE EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE SOMEWHERE ELSE, IN UTAH, ARIZONA, SOUTH CAROLINA WITH PERHAPS AN EXTRA GUN, A BIBLE & A CROSS & A BEER.
HUMANS HAVE BEEN NUMBED BY CORPORATIONS THE GOOD NEWS THERE ARE MILLIONS OF AMERICANS HIGHLY AWAKENED ITS ABOUT LOOKING INTO THE EYES OF THE OTHER, TOUCHING , CONNECTING. AMERICA CAN ONLY CHANGE FROM WITHIN.
CORPORATIONS CONTROL, KILL & DEHUMANIZE UNLESS PEOPLE DECIDE OTHERWISE.
RAMBO WAS A MADE UP HERO, MANUFUCKTURED BY CORPORATIONS HOWARD ZINN WAS THE REAL THING IN EVERY SENSE OF THE WORD,
IN EGYPT EVERYONE WAS A HERO THEY'RE STILL AT IT, PAINFUL BUT CAN BE DONE,THE EGYPTIANS HAVE SHOWED US, IT IS POSSIBLE TO SEE AN OLD VOLCANO COME ALIVE AGAIN.
NO TERROR NO TORTURE JUST TRUTH
It is incredible that the Americans spend a fortune trying to run the world when they cannot even run their own country properly. They would rather slaughter people overseas than invest in helping their own people have a better life. They need a revolt but oddly enough they are very passive about the inequality and the taking away of their rights.
Thanks Thalidomide
They do spend a fortune but that fortune is, & was never theirs, It was the peoples money the sweat & blood of the American people & families.
It was also the lute & war chests accumulations of rape & robbery of planet earth nation after nation in the wars of terror.
All of them WARS immoral, illegal & coward, in the international courts of the people, that is cafes, bars, pubs, homes, streets & so on.
Some ARE fully CONSCIOUS others to some extent they all witnessed IRAQ trashed beyond description. They know they are next. For the empire, the axes of evil is everywhere it keeps on changing, but we all know where it's epicenter is.
I have already asked this question why on earth did the UN give the ETHICAL & LEGAL GO to the US empire allowing an other invasion through an entity that has far worse record than the one we were supposed restraining, knowing pertinently what happened to IRAQ, Libya was a very good test for allowing A NEW approach AND different alternatives & solutions. I can mention @least one different & probably successful from every angle.
By now we should have a million & one question about IRAQ, that's an other story,
WHO ELSE NEEDS A REGIME CHANGE?
THREE CRITERIA APPLY
1 EITHER U HAVE EXTRAORDINAY AMOUNT OF RESOURCES
2 ALTHOUGH IT HAS NOT BEEN DONE YET, U HAPPEN TO WANT YOUR PEOPLE TO SHARE EQUALLY THE EXISTING RESOURCES, NATURALLY THAT'S A BIG NO for the shock doctrine disciples.
3 YOU HAPPEN TO BE UNLUCKY TO HAVE CONDITION ONE & TWO AND HAPPEN TO BE IN A STRATEGIC GEOPOLITICAL POSITION, HAVE SOME INFLUENCE IN THE AREA.
4 YOU FILL CONDITION 123 & YOU'RE NEAR OR POSSIBLY ABOUT TO BE SWALLOWED BY AN OTHER POWER.
I WAS WRONG,THE LIST CONTINUE...
YOU KNOW THAT UNBEARABLE EXPRESSION WHEN THEY INVADE A NATION, DESTROY EVERYTHING ON THEIR PATH, IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN & NOW PAKISTAN.
WE MUST FINISH THE JOB
WE MUST FINISH THE J
WE MUST FIN
WE MUST F
WE
MIRROR MIRROR, You are right,Thalidomide in the words of Leonard Cohen everyone knows.....
The world must unite against these invasions. NO TO GREEN ZONES there are other ways
No terror no torture just truth.
Last I heard, real unemployment including the officially unemployed, long-term unemployed and the chronically under-employed was still around 26 million Americans. Official and long-term unemployment (excluding the chronically underemployed) was at 15%. Peak Great Depression unemployment averaged 25% with an absolute peak of 27%, but we had half the population then that we do now.
There were six million unemployed in Germany between 1929 and 1933 as the Nazis consolidated power. By December of this year, at present rates of "job creation" we will have twice that many unemployed in the U.S. Luckily for our crooked politicians they are spread out across more geography in a much more politically atomized country. But that only means that the misery will get much worse leading to scattered and more easily crushed uprisings.
I wonder why Lindorff ignores the high number of older workers suffering long-term unemployment. He only suggests that they don't give up looking for work as much as younger workers because they have families to support. But he doesn't mention that this country's corporations (and much of popular culture) treats them as pariahs simply for being unemployed so long and being older--both of which are not their fault. I've been unemployed for 3 years and four months and have sold off most all of my possessions to survive. My unemployment benefits ran out over a year ago. All the government does for me is food stamps. The single biggest hurdle I have to overcome to look for work is money for bus & rail transportation, which no one--even the churches--is doing ANYTHING about. We recently had a job fair offering a few hundred jobs and 30,000 people showed up to apply.
I don't ignore the older unemployed. But if you read the article, it's pointing out the hypocrisy of the president's expressed concern about the YOUTH unemployment in the Middle East, and so I'm comparing it to the YOUTH unemployment in the US, which is actually far higher than among any other population cohort.
Just because I do that in an article doesn't mean I'm "ignoring" the older unemployed. I've written about that problem at length many times. I just happen to be focussing on something else in this article.
Geez. If you have to cover everything in every article, then every article would be a book.
Cut a writer some slack, man!
Dave Lindorff
www.thiscantbehappening.net
Please be gentle. Your defensive retort might suggest an inability to feel empathy for this commenter and others.
Hey. I'm 62 and am writing a book right now on how the corporate elite are pushing hard to kill Social Security and Medicare before my generation wakes up and realizes that they're stealing both programs for us after we paid for them. It's my contention that the Baby Boomer generation, which stood up to the vapid consumerist social system in the '60s and '70s, and threw a major wrench in the war machine, risking clubs, tear gas, arrest and even guns, will, when it wakes up, become a renewed force for a new progressive politics when push comes to shove over these programs.
Time to start organizing that awakening now.
Dave Lindorff
www.thiscantbehappening.net
No offense, purrsun, but I find Dave's response eminently courteous and reasonable.
Obviously YMMV, but I don't perceive hostility or a lack of empathy; I'd characterize it as responsive, not defensive in the pejorative sense.
Good point about the nature of the promised "aid", but please, I'm not "credulous."
The point of this article was not to analyze what the president is offering to Egypt or Tunisia. Actually, if that were the topic of my article, I would have looked at how the US actually gives more in military aid than it does in economic aid to these countries, and that's actually a negative in terms of helping their economies or their people.
But as I mentioned in reference to the prior writer's letter, the point of this article was specifically to call attention to the hypocrisy of the president in decrying the high youth unemployment in Egypt and Tunisia, while completely ignoring the plight of equally unemployed and desperate young people here in the US.
You're not getting an analysis of the uses and abuses of US foreign "aid" here. That's another article for another time. When you don't get everything addressed in an article, don't automatically assume that what the article doesn't address implies a "credulous" author. It's called "focus".
Dave Lindorff
www.thiscantbehappening.net
.....When you don't get everything addressed in an article, don't automatically assume that what the article doesn't address implies a "credulous" author. It's called "focus".....
Hang in there, Dave.
*sigh*
The problem is that modern day democracy is a farce, Of course Oilybomber want's to help with the continued corruption of the will of the people with "leaders" and "political party's".
The Zeitgeist of today has completely corrupted the ideas of democracy to be anything but. What we are told is a democracy is actually a plutocracy, always has been. since it's inception in Britain of the "Westminster system" in the 17th century.
Consider the battle for suffrage through out the years. First only land owners had the right to vote, then only men, and finally the rights of women we recognized in to the polls.
Every one should know that Politicians, and political party's are all PARASITES. Merely proxys for the rich, powerful, and privileged, to help them skim off of the fruits of the labour of the commoners. Capitalism is all about that. Today you hear about "Intellectual property" never about "Intellectual labour", as if any property of any value suddenly appears without the effort labour. Capitalism was at it zenith long ago when the slave trade was encouraged and people were property.
Instead of "elections" we should have "rejections". Sortition was always the sign of a true democracy, before the Westminster system was invented". The problem has been how to convince the public that this is the best way to manage national policy. Politicians will fight tooth and nail against a real democracy. Why are tax cuts so popular with the political class?. Aren't political contributions already tax deductible? It means more "partays" for the political class.
On voting day we should be given a ballot that names the incumbents. An X on any one line means you think that person should be sent packing. There should be 3 representatives for each riding.
If a representative gets a majority in these "rejections" he/she is removed from the assembly/parliament/congress and a new person is selected randomly from eligible voters.
Who are eligible voters? Any one who goes to the pols and wishes to represent their constituency gets a second ballot with their name on it. This is put into the "selection" box
Electronic voting is not allowed except for the printing of "selection" ballots at the polling station
After a minimal introduction and vetting of the candidate he/she will join the assembly with term limits of say 5 years, but every year must face "rejections"
If you want an upper chamber people who have survived in the lower chamber may be selected in the same manner for the upper chamber.
LOVE IT!!
LOVE IT again!! Current politicians would oops in their pants!
The ruling class of no country wants democracy for their own country. The USA demonstrates its love for democracy by promoting right wing dictators in other countries and calling that democracy. Remember Reagan's support of the Contras in Central America and comparing them to the founding fathers of this country?
Ron Paul. The guy who would abolish the programs that keep old people from dying in our streets. I mean, isn't the crumbling infrastructure enough? The Democrats' betrayal of Americans in favor of greedy bastards would multiply exponentially under the Ron Paul brand of libertarianism. Sure, he would fight to bring the troops home, under his "Unitary" authority, as you put it. But if he succeeded, you think for one second that he will direct the Congress to allocate those monies to job creation? That is completely against what he believes as I understand libertarianism. But I'm open to be educated on the subject.
Hypocrisy is the definition of government and the US is the prime example. Maybe the youth in the US will "rise up" if they run out of Mountain Dew and Kit Kats. Till then it's all about entitlement.
Children's literature is to the dawn of Aquarius as music was to the sixties. From Voldemort to Dr. Smog inhaling burning books, to get the ideas, the youth of today are clear on many different games that evil plays. It's just as tough for them to really believe that war monger reality is worse than rule the world fiction as it is for grownups. Also, strong expert propaganda works unceasingly to lull normally alert minds.
I have long thought (20 years or so) that the gradual loss of our liberties and the increasing surveillance was for one reason and one reason only. To keep track of ordinary citizens as we increasingly reject the domestic and foreign policies of the minute minority that occupies this democracy. We are not spied upon to keep track of terrorists. That should be rather easy to do as most of them live inside the DC beltway.
What a sickening bunch, those bastards that call themselves Americans yet pass laws that assist the tyrants.
And what do we call the average American that keeps electing them? Red Coats?
Absolutely correct. And in that same vein, the fact that whistleblowers have stated the Bush Administration started domestic wiretaps in mass just a few months after entering office, should in itself, cause everyone to question the events of 9/11.
Forget about Demos. Time for the young to rise up and destroy the ancient regime. No more voting and pacifism. It wont work. Time to move past such silly notions as pacifism and the MLK syndrome. Obsolete and useless strategies. Time for ACTION!
Revolution must be real and DEEP!
Actually, this suggests an idea. What if we called for rallies of all unemployed and underemployed people in a central location, in each metropolitan region. After all, it's not like the unemployed don't have the time. Unlike the culture war or antiwar rallies, the unemployment rallies would actually garner widespread public sympathy, since practically everybody has a friend or family member who is un or under employed. Further, the politicians of both parties would glom onto this, looking for any conceivable political advantage.
"Their focus, such as it is, is on now on elections, on recall campaigns, and on the coming 2012 presidential contest."
i.e. on "democracy"®
the "one man, one vote" system.
problem: that one man is The Decider.
"The traditional groups that would have done this in the past--the labor movement, civil rights organizations, and political groups on the left--have been somehow neutered." They have been gutted by cheap labor and defunding. Used to be, construction workers working on houses were making a wage that would allow them to build their own houses. They have all lost their jobs to cheap $7.00 hr labor. Loss of jobs and lowered wages are what has caused most of the loan defaults. I lost my job at a concrete company due to day laborers and had to take early retirement cause I couldn't find another job. The only good jobs are union jobs. And they are trying to outlaw unions.
Why are we still issuing work VISAs? Don't tell me that workers in this country are not as intelligent or don't work as hard as imported workers. The real reason is employer doesn't have to pay in to medical, retirement and can offer a depressed wage and has no fear of them unionising cause he'll just send them back. I guess you could call them scabs. That's why so many undocumented workers are hired - employers don't have to pay taxes, workmen's comp, unemployment, medical or retirement. Now they can't find anyone to buy the products their making.
We will have a slave state soon. When you can only afford to pay for your food and housing, you're a slave.
Banks should be forced to sell housing stock at market rates. There is no wish nor plan for democracy in the USA. If there were, then the biggest engine of economic recovery would be used... housing. The home is the biggest investment, and is the largest expense. The plan should be to "mark to market". Let housing prices across the country drop to the level that they sell. Low income people would by them at a price that they could afford. This would create massive amounts of employment as people need to make improvements and have maintenance done, buy furniture, insurance, and live. It would probably wipe out a lot of bad banks.. a win-win situation.