EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Congress: Teaching New Dogs Old Tricks
Remember that scene in "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" when Jimmy Stewart arrives in the capital for the first time? The freshman senator shakes off his handlers in Union Station and jumps onto a sightseeing bus, eager to see all the statues and monuments honoring the greats of American history.
"I don't think I've ever been so thrilled in my life," he says afterwards. "And that Lincoln Memorial -- gee whiz! Mr. Lincoln, there he is. Just looking straight at you as you come up those steps. Just sitting there like he was waiting for somebody to come along."
For all their talk of the Founding Fathers, the Constitution and core principles, you’d have thought that the current freshman class of Congress, the sprouted seed of Tea Partiers and the 2010 midterms, would have made a similar tour their first priority on arrival. And for all I know, many of them did just that. But for some, the siren song of cash and influence has proven stronger, already luring them onto the rocks of privilege and corruption that lurk just inside the Beltway. They’ve made a beeline not for the hallowed shrines of patriots’ pride but the elegant suites of K Street lobbyists, where the closest its residents have been to Lincoln is the bearded face peering from the five-dollar bill -- chump change.
So much for fiercely resisting the wicked, wicked ways of Washington. These new members were seduced faster than Dustin Hoffman in "The Graduate."
In an April 2 editorial, The New York Times reported, "Since last year’s Republican victories, nearly 100 lawmakers have hired former lobbyists as their chiefs of staff or legislative directors, according to data compiled by two watchdog groups, the Center for Responsive Politics and Remapping Debate. That is more than twice as many as in the previous two years.
"In that same period, 40 lobbyists have been hired as staff members of Congressional committees and subcommittees, the boiler rooms where legislation is drafted. That again dwarfs the number from the previous two years. While some of those lobbyist-staffers were hired by Democrats, the vast majority are working for Republicans... In many cases, those hiring lobbyists were Tea Party candidates who vowed to end business as usual in Washington."
The revolving door between government and lobbyists has never spun faster. Then there’s this, from Wednesday’s Washington Post: "Many of the Republican freshmen in the House won election vowing to shake up Washington, so it’s a little surprising that many of them seem to be playing an old Washington game: raising much of their campaign money from corporate political action committees.
"More than 50 members of the class of 87 GOP freshmen took in more than $50,000 from PACs during the first quarter of 2011, according to new campaign disclosure reports filed with the Federal Election Commission. Eighteen of the lawmakers took in more than $100,000."
For example, freshman star Kristi Noem of South Dakota – one of the two newbies anointed as liaison to the Republican House leadership – raised $169,000 in PAC money, including cash from General Electric, Boeing, Raytheon, Wells Fargo, Fedex, AFLAC, Altria (the parent company of Philip Morris and Kraft Foods) and pharmaceutical giants Bayer and GlaxoSmithKline.
According to the nonpartisan Sunlight Foundation, Rep. Noem, who pledged to voters not to make Washington her home, held at least 10 fundraisers in DC during that first quarter, her first months as a member of Congress. They included two dinners at the Capital Grille, at which attendees donated between $1500 and $2000 apiece, and lunch at We, the Pizza on Pennsylvania Avenue.
A CQ MoneyLine study reports that during the first three months of the year the 87 Republican freshmen pulled in a total of $14.7 million from individuals as well as PACs. Leading the crowd was Diane Black of Tennessee with $926,000, but more than two-thirds of it was her own money. In second place was West Virginia’s David B. McKinley, with $540,000.
Rep. McKinley was one of nine new GOP members spotlighted this week by the website Politico as members who have done things "the Washington way, using a legislative process they once railed against to try to assist donors, protect favored industries or settle scores with their political enemies."
Three weeks after his swearing in, McKinley introduced a bill to overturn an Environmental Protection Agency ruling that vetoed an Army Corps of Engineers water permit for mountaintop mining, the practice that blasts the tops off mountains and sends debris raining down on communities, streams and rivers. The bill has ramifications for the entire mining industry, but the specific mine in question is owned by Arch Coal. Its PAC contributed $2500 to McKinley’s 2010 election campaign and another thousand so far this year.
The mining industry was McKinley’s largest corporate campaign contributor -- $51,751. And a month after he took office, Politico reported, he introduced another bill "that would block a proposed EPA regulation against coal-ash bricks and drywall, materials architectural and engineering firms -- such as one founded by McKinley -- routinely recommend in construction project bids."
Others cited by the Politico investigation include freshmen Bill Johnson of Ohio and Morgan Griffith of Virginia. They, too, have been going to bat for mine executives. The mining sector was Johnson’s biggest corporate donor at $25,146; same with Griffith, who received $40,450.
Texas freshman Bill Flores has been going after the Interior Department’s procedures for offshore oil drilling permits, trying get the department to impose tighter deadlines and pay back billions in leasing rights to oil companies whose permits are denied. He’s the former president and CEO of an exploratory oil firm. Its employees were his second largest campaign contributor and the oil and gas industry threw in more than $200,000.
In rebuttal, the office of each congressman has generated the appropriate, high-minded spin. "West Virginia is coal, and coal is West Virginia," said McKinley’s spokeswoman. "He’s doing what he said he would -- fighting tooth and nail to stop the EPA’s war on coal..." Rep. Flores told Politico, "This is an issue that is very important to me as I have been involved in finding solutions to America’s long-term energy independence for the last thirty years."
And so it goes. At this rate, if the Abraham Lincoln so venerated by the idealistic Mr. Smith is still at his memorial hoping for someone to come along, someone with integrity and dedication to the people and not the almighty dollar, he’s going to have a long wait.
The new dogs have learned the old tricks of Capitol Hill with remarkable speed, and their big business masters, armed with their Supreme Court-sanctioned ability to throw bottomless bags of money around, have more control of the leash than ever.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...




9 Comments so far
Show AllWonderful how U.S. politics works -- the president does on line question and answer meetings for young people and liberals while at the same time getting hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions: Town Haul Meetings.
The establishment, the Powers That Be, the ruling class -- whatever one believes they should be called -- has evidently come to the conclusion that the Obama presidency is working for them. So they have sent him out to make up with the liberals and progressives. For me it's too late despite the fact that he's smoother and smarter than was President Junior and can handle questions without making a "gaff." He can ad lib and still stay "on message." But he jilted us and now they want him to sweet talk us into giving him another chance. They're all alike: promise you the moon and leave you with nothing.
I don't know who'll go up against him. Will the Republicans run one of their colorful trash talking wack jobs like Donald Trump, Sarah Palin, or Michelle Malkin? Will they run a boring middle aged white man like Mitt Romney? Will they split the difference and run Newt Gingrich who fits both categories? Will there be a third party candidate or a breakaway Democrat?
It would all be great fun, U.S. political theater at its goofiest, but for the fact that everything is going bad and getting worse and the problems need to be dealt with soon or it will be too late. Maybe the powers behind the throne have decided to set up Barack Obama as a perfect fall guy, good enough to be left holding the bag while they abscond with their ill gotten gains just as the land of liberty collapses into a failed state. Even extremely smart people can harbor delusions and be in denial. I wonder if he has any clue how disposable he is.
"I'm shocked! Shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!"
_______________________
Why, these politicians are behaving as if they are nothing more than mere venal, money-grubbing technocrats-- newly-hired middle-managers in a para-corporate service delivery system!
They seem utterly oblivious to the Sacred Trust involved in becoming an Elected Misrepresentative in the finest, most distinguished political institution in the history of the world! And right in front of those statues of Lincoln and Jefferson and all!
And it must be because they're all odious Republicans-- clearly, the problem is principally with the sordid Party of Cain. The article is very careful to note that only "some of those lobbyist-staffers were hired by Democrats".
Well! This profound, insightful review has certainly taught ME which Big Lever to pull, come November!
____________________
Afterthought: It's impossible to tell whether all of the writers who habitually make pointed references to the partisan aspects of the phenomena about which they're writing are purposely attempting to reinforce partisan, duopolistic, lesser-evil memes.
In other words, I don't really know if Winship and so many others regularly published at CommonDreams consciously and deliberately devoted to encouraging readers to recognize the utter depravity and evil of the Republican Party (The Party of Cain), in order to encourage support for the less-evil Democratic Party (The Party of Judas).
I appreciate that from the perspective of liberal/"progressive" pundits, political insiders all, that most likely is simply the way things really are-- the Republicans truly ARE consistently reprehensible, corrupt, and self-serving, whereas the Democrats are RELATIVELY decent, principled, etc.
I'm sure they would object that they're not certainly not imagining this difference, or making it up, or going out of their way to rub their readers' noses in it. They're writing from honest experience.
So it may be unfair to ascribe this perception to overt partisan propagandistic tendencies.
That said, I find that in recent months-- years, by now-- I've become more keenly aware of this rhetorical subtext. Even if these writers don't mean to always harp on and promulgate the persuasive "evil Republicans vs. the better Democrats" theme to advance the Democrats' interests, that remains an egregious and unavoidable implication in their writing.
And this needs to be called out and criticized because it's a fallacy-- albeit a fallacy fervently subscribed to and advocated by many pundits and a few die-hard regular commenters at CD.
As long as these pundits-- Winship, Reich, Kuttner, Hightower, Parry, Nichols et al-- keep the analysis on that circular, two-dimensional level, they will never confront the systemic meta-issues, e.g. class, economics, deep politics, etc. that drive the circular, linear merry-go-round, swings, and seesaws of the Amerikan political playground.
They keep us all stuck in the political sandbox while they build the same sand castles over and over.
NYT sez: "... nearly 100 lawmakers have hired former lobbyists as their chiefs of staff or legislative directors ..."
***
Memo to Times: There's no such thing as a "former" lobbyist.
This Supreme Court (some of whose members gave the presidency to Bush, followed by the assault on The People by endorsing the power of $ to trump all other deciding factors) is to democracy what a lynch mob is to justice.
Amerika has been placed on its knees, forced to worship Mammon (and Mars-based rules where war trumps all other priorities, even as more and more citizens join the ranks of the poor, jobless, homeless, and those denied medical care access).
Siouxrose
When there is no systemic justice, a lynch mob is all you got left.
LIKE: I noticed your consciousness is evolving with respect to universal access to health care. Bravo for that! Your soul is apparently alive!
As for THIS "Supreme Court," several are retreads from an earlier period, I'd say The Inquisition. The only difference: the century AND style of the robes worn.
"In that same period, 40 lobbyists have been hired as staff members of Congressional committees and subcommittees, the boiler rooms where legislation is drafted."
In the jargon of investment fraud, the locus of a telemarketing scam is called a "boiler room". In former times the work was often done literally in boiler rooms, but nowadays the scammers prefer slightly more upscale surroundings. Nevertheless, if someone calls you out of the blue to offer you a hot deal on certified-genuine gemstones, or penny stocks in undervalued companies, your tempter is calling from a "boiler room".
Somehow I couldn't help thinking of that ...
Representative government, designed to fail.
Direct democracy