Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Duck and Cover
“Within 10 seconds the fire that wiped out the city came after us at full speed. Everyone was naked. Bodies were swelling up. Some people were so deformed I couldn’t tell if they were male or female. People died screaming, ‘Please give me water!’
“There was nothing to eat, not even garbage, in the burned down city.”
What if schoolchildren stood facing not the American flag every morning before class started but a photograph of a devastated Hiroshima, shortly after it was obliterated by our atomic bomb, and pledged their allegiance to the idea that such a thing will never happen again?
Do you think we’d start growing up as a country? Do you think we’d still have several thousand nuclear missiles on hair-trigger alert, pointed at Russia (with Russia having about as many pointed at us)? Do you think — as I begin reaching wildly for the impossible — we’d start facing our fears instead of living in fear?
Do you think we might start questioning the nuclear weapons industry and stop worshipping our own weapons of mass destruction — or at least stop selling Fat Man and Little Boy earrings at the gift shop of the Atomic Testing Museum in Las Vegas?
The inspiration for these questions is an extraordinary new documentary called Atomic Mom, which I saw this week at the Talking Pictures Film Festival in Evanston, Ill. The movie, produced and directed by M.T. Silvia, tells the story of Silvia’s mother, Pauline — the “Atomic Mom” — who as a young naval officer in the early 1950s participated in top-secret radiation research, and some four decades later had a crisis of conscience and embarked on her own journey of peace. Atomic Mom cuts to the deepest issues of American life with excruciating moral clarity.
The documentary also tells the story of several Japanese survivors of the Hiroshima blast, focusing primarily on Emiko Okada, who is quoted above. She was a little girl whose family was living on the outskirts of Hiroshima on Aug. 6, 1945. Her older sister, Mieko, had just left for school when the bomb hit, and, “She still has not come back since she left that morning.”
Later that day, when the fire subsided, Emiko’s mother went walking barefoot through the ruined city looking for her daughter, but never found her.
The film’s power comes not just from the stories, of the victims of the nuclear age and some of its deeply self-questioning participants, but from the juxtaposition of the Japanese and American experiences of the bomb, including a comparison of Hiroshima’s Peace Memorial Museum and the Atomic Testing Museum, which M.T. Silvia and her mother visit at one point in the film.
The Hiroshima museum is moving and horrifying, radiating humanity in the shards of atomic wreckage — a sandal, a child’s tricycle — on display. It is a museum committed to disarmament and world peace.
In contrast, the Atomic Testing Museum, in the heart of Las Vegas, America’s fun capital, is an adolescent theme park of raw power, with sensurround simulations of nuclear detonation and endless videos of our prowess at blowing big holes in the ground, but no acknowledgement of the human cost of the technology being celebrated. And, oh yeah, those earrings in the images of the bombs we dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, where people died screaming for water, are available at the gift shop.
“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the avoidance for which it stands . . .”
A family dives under a picnic blanket while the voiceover intones with dramatic urgency: “If you’re caught in the open, take cover immediately!” A cute blonde at a beauty parlor has her tresses done up in an atomic hairdo. . . .
The film deftly and often with stunning shock value splices such images — inane civil defense clips, comic book scenes of Cold War-era Armageddon, bland images of ’50s conformity — between the stories of the bomb survivors or Pauline Silvia’s anguished account of the work she did at the Naval Radiological Test Laboratory in San Francisco.
“We literally burned these dogs right down to the skin,” Pauline says at one point, describing the radiation testing she and her colleagues carried out on mongrel dogs from the local pound. “(They had) burns and ulcerations all over their legs, ears, face.”
Some years later, when she took her cats to the vet, she heard their toenails scraping on the exam table in the next room, and suddenly, “It took me back to the dogs,” she said, breaking into tears, “how they scratched in such agony. I couldn’t bear to hear the cats scratch at the vet’s. It was too much for me.”
Pauline Silvia’s breakthrough of conscience felt, in Atomic Mom, like the emergence of a national conscience, which of course has no official presence yet, at the Atomic Testing Museum or anywhere else in the corridors of government and power.
The film ends in outreach and long-distance connection between the two moms, Pauline and Emiko — who, through M.T., gives a dozen paper cranes from the Peace Museum to Pauline, who writes back in gratitude: “I believe your people are my people. Our families are one and the same. They were created by a loving God.”
And so we see peace arrive, as a prayer, not a salute.


33 Comments so far
Show AllThank you, Robert Koehler, for this important article!
"the emergence of a national conscience , ,, in the corridors of government and power [?}"
As tall an order as squaring the circle, I am afraid.
"The U.S. has carried out 1,030 nuclear weapons tests (the last and final test on 23 September 1993). The Soviet Union: 715 tests (the last on 25 October 1990 -- Russia has not exploded any nuclear weapons). France: 210 tests (the last and final test on 27 January 1996). Britain: 45 tests (the last and final on 26 November 1991). China: 43 tests (with some four more tests reportedly planned for 1996-1997).
The average pace of nuclear weapons testing is remarkable: Since 16 July 1945 there have been 2,044 tests worldwide, the equivalent of one test occurring somewhere in the world every nine days for the last fifty years.
The U.S. has conducted the equivalent of one nuclear weapons test every 17 days since its first test; the Soviet Union has tested on average every 23 days; France every 63 days; Britain every 349 days and; China every 222 days. India has conducted only one test so far."
http://archive.greenpeace.org/comms/nukes/ctbt/read9.html
" But let us move to Chernobyl. The health effects of the Chernobyl accident are massive and demonstrable. They have been studied by many research groups in Russia, Belarus and the Ukraine, in the USA, Greece, Germany, Sweden, Switzerland and Japan. The scientific peer reviewed literature is enormous. Hundreds of papers report the effects, increases in cancer and a range of other diseases. My colleague Alexey Yablokov of the Russian Academy of Sciences, published a review of these studies in the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (2009). Earlier in 2006 he and I collected together reviews of the Russian literature by a group of eminent radiation scientists and published these in the book Chernobyl, 20 Years After. The result: more than a million people have died between 1986 and 2004 as a direct result of Chernobyl."
http://www.counterpunch.org/busby03282011.html
"Why is the ICRP model unsafe? Because it is based on “absorbed dose”. This is average radiation energy in Joules divided by the mass of living tissue into which it is diluted. A milliSievert is one milliJoule of energy diluted into one kilogram of tissue. As such it would not distinguish between warming yourself in front of a fire and eating a red hot coal. It is the local distribution of energy that is the problem. The dose from a singly internal alpha particle track to a single cell is 500mSv! The dose to the whole body from the same alpha track is 5 x 10-11 mSv. That is 0.000000000005mSv. But it is the dose to the cell that causes the genetic damage and the ultimate cancer. The cancer yield per unit dose employed by ICRP is based entirely on external acute high dose radiation at Hiroshima, where the average dose to a cell was the same for all cells."
http://www.counterpunch.org/busby03282011.html
You left out of the list the tests conducted by India, Pakistan, and North Korea. They were all underground tests, but the technology for above ground detonations exists.
He didn't forget, the quote he used was from sometime in 1996 because it talks about planned tests in 1996.
I think environmental issues trump everything else there is, especially warmaking and military conflicts which nowhere are improving anything.
The military uses more oil and than the whole rest of the country. A single Abrams tank goes about two gallons per mile. The planes are worse.
Nobody in the mainstream political realm will openly call for a reduction in military spending because they would be howled at for leaving the populace vulnerable to attack. The budget, the huge list of places where we have military bases, the outrageous cost of many of the "weapons systems" that will never be used -- all this is difficult to get across to the U.S. general public.
Thanks for the heads-up. I will be very much looking forward to that "open call" about military spending (who is it that's going to do this open calling?) and will follow developments as diligently as my short attention span permits.
What are we still doing in Germany is indeed a good question. There's a whole list of places about which that could be asked.
"I am become death, the destroyer of worlds. "
J. Robert Oppenheimer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Robert_Oppenheimer
likeitornot,
Don't normally agree with the way you write things but this time you're absolutely right. In a perfect world we would be beyond all these types of weapons. Nuclear, chemical, biological, cluster bombs, land mines, etc.
However, as you point out its never going to happen in our lifetimes. And not just because of the vast amounts of money that the armaments industry rakes in. Completely eliminating these weapons won't happen simply because no country that has them is going to be willing to get rid of them as long as the others still have them.
Those who advocate complete disarmament have never found a way around this simple problem. Even partial disarmament through the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaties has been a slow and complicated process. Its not just the warheads, but the delivery systems that become huge issues of contention among the nations.
While I agree that complete disarmament won't happen, there isn't any rational basis in national security that would prevent us from unilaterally slashing our nuclear arsenal from the 5,000+ warheads by upwards of 90%.
Of course this would necessitate that we upgrade our nuclear weapons processing facilities in order to safety dismantle these warheads. Even then we're placed in the position of finding long term secure storage for the fissionable materials such as the plutonium that they contain.
All in all a bad situation that doesn't have simple answers or that is going to be resolved anytime soon.
And for those who think we haven't made some progress on stopping the madness, the U.S. alone has gone from some 32,000+ warheads in the sixties to just over 5,000 today. Of course they've gotten more powerful, but the huge reductions we've achieved proves we can still reduce even more.
The ideal: “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the avoidance for which it stands . . .”
The reality: "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the VIOLENCE for which it stands . . .”
"What if schoolchildren stood facing not the American flag every morning before class started but a photograph of a devastated Hiroshima, shortly after it was obliterated by our atomic bomb, and pledged their allegiance to the idea that such a thing will never happen again?"
___________________
No, that's not going to happen in the Amerikan Imperium. It would be a travesty and mockery of the triumphalism and chauvinism that is still very much taken for granted by the power elite, including past, present, and future Elected Misrepresentatives.
Anyway, I think that Israel copyrighted the expression "Never Again!"; its government would never allow such a fundamental trademark, the foundation of its "brand", to be used and diluted for a lesser purpose.
And adherents of unsentimental realpolitik would object that there are several circumstances that preclude ruling out the admittedly dreadful and repugnant possibility: "Well, they started it!"; "Better them than us!"; "it must be done to forestall a humanitarian crisis"; "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price--we think the price is worth it."
This article compelled me to dive into the CommonDreams archives and call up a couple of-- you should pardon the expression-- blasts from the past. They're both from November, 2007, and prompted by the death of "Hiroshima Bomber" Paul Tibbets:
_________________
"Hiroshima Bomber Unrepentant till Death" by Amitabh Pal*
"Tibbets Did Duty in Dropping Bomb, But Then Reveled in It"
by Pierre Tristam**
* http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/11/03/4992
** http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/11/06/5062
_________________
The Tristam article discusses Tibbets' hawking (again, you should pardon the expression) "Enola Gay" memorabilia in his old age.
The articles are also noteworthy for the comments threads; one in particular was monopolized by self-described "military historians" who vehemently defend and justify Truman's use of atomic weapons.
And, in line with the "better them than us!" rationale, there are many who are grateful for the effects of Hiroshima and Nagasaki because otherwise, their daddies, granddaddies, and uncles would've been turned into piles of goo during the otherwise inevitable invasion of Tokyo.
They aren't about to tell today's babies and schoolchildren that We Won't Do That Anymore. That would be hypocritical! What if circumstances placed today's daddies, granddaddies, and uncles (and now mommies, grandmoms, and aunts) in similar jeopardy?
Sometimes it's impossible to separate the wheel of fortune from the cycle of violence.
Since it just so happens that I finished re-reading "Slaughterhouse-Five" last night, I have to add: so it goes.
Maybe the military historians will return to this thread, armored to the teeth with factual minutiae about troop deployments and weapons capabilities in the Pacific Theater, and conduct another historical blitzkrieg upon the foolish, lily-livered ideal of world peace and disarmament.
They will explain, mostly patiently if tediously, that Hiroshima, etc. had nothing to do with Truman and the Amerikan power elite being evil, brutal, ruthless, amoral, and so forth.
Free will was not involved; it turns out that dropping the A-bombs was an all but involuntary action-- the necessary, inevitable endgame of an international real-world, real-time chess match determined by facts on the ground, e.g. the number of Kropotkin Z-720 light tanks marshalled outside of Minsk. (I just made the names up-- who but a true "military historian" zealously keeps track of such military nomenclature and logistics?)
While we await the battle, let us pray the Serenity Prayer; or avail ourselves of this parthian shot of grim graphics:
_________________
"A Time-Lapse Map of Every Nuclear Explosion Since 1945" - by Isao Hashimoto***
*** http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLCF7vPanrY&feature=player_embedded
hey, OS!
fascinating map...thank you...
RE: “Her older sister, Mieko, had just left for school when the bomb hit, and, 'She still has not come back since she left that morning'.” - Koehler's article
MY SNARK: As the über empathetic "Pricky Dick" Cheney is fond of saying, "So?"
Or, as the über empathetic Donald Rumsfeld once said, "Stuff happens!"
Aren't you proud to be an American?
Fascist amerika is a sick, brainwashed nation, war mongering nation !
The US will only embrace true disarmament AFTER one of it's major cities is reduced to a smoking radioactive cinder.
"We literally burned these dogs right down to the skin,” Pauline says at one point, describing the radiation testing she and her colleagues carried out on mongrel dogs from the local pound."
In an alternate reality the Axis powers win WWII and those experiments are done on POWs and Untermenschen.
Galen -
From the reaction of the leadership of both major political parties, the mainstream US media, and a substantial swath of the American public in the aftermath of 9/11, I fear the likely reaction to your Smoking Radioactive Cinder City images would be calls for retaliation, revenge, and more of the same rather than a popular embrace of true disarmament.
If such a nuclear catastrophe on American soil were a homegrown accident, maybe.
But if it was an act of war sponsored by a nation state or an act of terrorism by some nongovernmental entity, the reaction would be to sharpen, brandish, and strike back with even more swords rather than fashioning them into plowshares.
Bill from Saginaw
"But if it was an act of war sponsored by a nation state or an act of terrorism by some nongovernmental entity, the reaction would be to sharpen, brandish, and strike back with even more swords rather than fashioning them into plowshares."
Hell, in 1962, during the Cuban missile crisis, the Joint Chiefs of Staff where practically yelling at JFK to bomb Cuba AND the USSR preemptively with nuclear bombs. JFK wouldn't do that and was secretly corresponding with Khrushchev to avert a world-wide nuclear holocaust, which obviously, they did (Khrushchev, too, was being pushed by his generals to bomb the U.S.)
Those same people (pathologically) are still in the Pentagon. The only difference is that JFK is not president.
Sounds like an alphabet soup of organizations and people who wanted JFK dead. I'm not sure they were all directly involved in the assassination, but certainly all were cheering.
The only one amongst all those you listed who I believe was not involved in the assassination, was Oswald. He was a pawn used by the CIA. James Douglass goes into this at length in his book, "JFK and the Unspeakable."
As far as RFK and MLK go - yes, all had to be disposed of in order for the M-I-C to roll on. As it does.
So goes the story.
What the story doesn't say is that the Japanese were on the verge of surrendering. Also what the story doesn't say is that Truman was ecstatic when he learned of the successful bombings of the two cities. He knew that that the next war was the Cold War and he wanted to fire the first shot. And he did.
How could 'the alternative' of a protracted invasion of a defeated country with a shattered economy have been 'worse' than the evaporation of several hundred thousand *living* human beings?
The US actually had invasion plans in place, and the soldiers had been trained for just such an eventuality. In fact, there were many US soldiers who were quite gravely disappointed when the decision NOT to invade was made. Many members of the Army, Navy and Marines were looking forward to exacting personal bloody vengeance on Japan for the 'atrocity' of Pearl Harbor (an 'atrocity' the US Government and Military had at least two weeks warning about, yet still ALLOWED to happen!)
The cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were chosen as sacrificial victims to show the USSR and the rest of the world the weapons capability US had, as well as the callous cold-hearted viciousness to actually use them on civilians.
Yes, I agree with the last two posts that it was the "the shot fired over the bow" of the Soviet Union telling them to not get two headstrong with their resent success in Europe.
My belief - although history is not my strong point - is that the Japanese agreed to surrender but the U.S. wanted total and unconditional surrender with occupation and control in forming the new government which they obviously achieved by the (IMHO) needless and tragic blood bath that ensued.
Some will counter that because of these horrific first uses on mostly civilian populations and their horrific effect on the human psychic of being witness to such tragedy in images has kept the nuclear guns in their holsters (silo's ) for some 65 years now.success
I guess it's hard to argue with this "success" but the truly wise would have buried the formula and made it's rediscovery a cosmic sin of the highest order.
Among all the people who will see this movie, some will be converted by it. Some might even be inspired by it. Maybe one of them will lead a movement a couple of years from now. Maybe the potential for great numbers of people to do the right thing hasn't been extinguished.
Gee,
According to Arnie Gunderson, VP of Three Mile Island clean up, we are already staring at 1000 times Hiroshima radiation with the Seven stricken nuclear reactors at Fukushima (no cooling), THREE which have already melted down and one (Number Four) which keeps catching fire since twenty years of deadly fuel rods are smoking up into the air.
Congratulations Nuclear Industry and US Government, you finally nuked us all.
TJ