EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Why the United States Is Destroying Its Education System
A nation that destroys its systems of education, degrades its public information, guts its public libraries and turns its airwaves into vehicles for cheap, mindless amusement becomes deaf, dumb and blind. It prizes test scores above critical thinking and literacy. It celebrates rote vocational training and the singular, amoral skill of making money. It churns out stunted human products, lacking the capacity and vocabulary to challenge the assumptions and structures of the corporate state. It funnels them into a caste system of drones and systems managers. It transforms a democratic state into a feudal system of corporate masters and serfs.
Teachers, their unions under attack, are becoming as replaceable as minimum-wage employees at Burger King. We spurn real teachers—those with the capacity to inspire children to think, those who help the young discover their gifts and potential—and replace them with instructors who teach to narrow, standardized tests. These instructors obey. They teach children to obey. And that is the point. The No Child Left Behind program, modeled on the “Texas Miracle,” is a fraud. It worked no better than our deregulated financial system. But when you shut out debate these dead ideas are self-perpetuating.
Passing bubble tests celebrates and rewards a peculiar form of analytical intelligence. This kind of intelligence is prized by money managers and corporations. They don’t want employees to ask uncomfortable questions or examine existing structures and assumptions. They want them to serve the system. These tests produce men and women who are just literate and numerate enough to perform basic functions and service jobs. The tests elevate those with the financial means to prepare for them. They reward those who obey the rules, memorize the formulas and pay deference to authority. Rebels, artists, independent thinkers, eccentrics and iconoclasts—those who march to the beat of their own drum—are weeded out.
“Imagine,” said a public school teacher in New York City, who asked that I not use his name, “going to work each day knowing a great deal of what you are doing is fraudulent, knowing in no way are you preparing your students for life in an ever more brutal world, knowing that if you don’t continue along your scripted test prep course and indeed get better at it you will be out of a job. Up until very recently, the principal of a school was something like the conductor of an orchestra: a person who had deep experience and knowledge of the part and place of every member and every instrument. In the past 10 years we’ve had the emergence of both [Mayor] Mike Bloomberg’s Leadership Academy and Eli Broad’s Superintendents Academy, both created exclusively to produce instant principals and superintendents who model themselves after CEOs. How is this kind of thing even legal? How are such ‘academies’ accredited? What quality of leader needs a ‘leadership academy’? What kind of society would allow such people to run their children’s schools? The high-stakes tests may be worthless as pedagogy but they are a brilliant mechanism for undermining the school systems, instilling fear and creating a rationale for corporate takeover. There is something grotesque about the fact the education reform is being led not by educators but by financers and speculators and billionaires.”
Teachers, under assault from every direction, are fleeing the profession. Even before the “reform” blitzkrieg we were losing half of all teachers within five years after they started work—and these were people who spent years in school and many thousands of dollars to become teachers. How does the country expect to retain dignified, trained professionals under the hostility of current conditions? I suspect that the hedge fund managers behind our charter schools system—whose primary concern is certainly not with education—are delighted to replace real teachers with nonunionized, poorly trained instructors. To truly teach is to instill the values and knowledge which promote the common good and protect a society from the folly of historical amnesia. The utilitarian, corporate ideology embraced by the system of standardized tests and leadership academies has no time for the nuances and moral ambiguities inherent in a liberal arts education. Corporatism is about the cult of the self. It is about personal enrichment and profit as the sole aim of human existence. And those who do not conform are pushed aside.
“It is extremely dispiriting to realize that you are in effect lying to these kids by insinuating that this diet of corporate reading programs and standardized tests are preparing them for anything,” said this teacher, who feared he would suffer reprisals from school administrators if they knew he was speaking out. “It is even more dispiriting to know that your livelihood depends increasingly on maintaining this lie. You have to ask yourself why are hedge fund managers suddenly so interested in the education of the urban poor? The main purpose of the testing craze is not to grade the students but to grade the teacher.”
“I cannot say for certain—not with the certainty of a Bill Gates or a Mike Bloomberg who pontificate with utter certainty over a field in which they know absolutely nothing—but more and more I suspect that a major goal of the reform campaign is to make the work of a teacher so degrading and insulting that the dignified and the truly educated teachers will simply leave while they still retain a modicum of self-respect,” he added. “In less than a decade we been stripped of autonomy and are increasingly micromanaged. Students have been given the power to fire us by failing their tests. Teachers have been likened to pigs at a trough and blamed for the economic collapse of the United States. In New York, principals have been given every incentive, both financial and in terms of control, to replace experienced teachers with 22-year-old untenured rookies. They cost less. They know nothing. They are malleable and they are vulnerable to termination.”
The demonizing of teachers is another public relations feint, a way for corporations to deflect attention from the theft of some $17 billion in wages, savings and earnings among American workers and a landscape where one in six workers is without employment. The speculators on Wall Street looted the U.S. Treasury. They stymied any kind of regulation. They have avoided criminal charges. They are stripping basic social services. And now they are demanding to run our schools and universities.
“Not only have the reformers removed poverty as a factor, they’ve removed students’ aptitude and motivation as factors,” said this teacher, who is in a teachers union. “They seem to believe that students are something like plants where you just add water and place them in the sun of your teaching and everything blooms. This is a fantasy that insults both student and teacher. The reformers have come up with a variety of insidious schemes pushed as steps to professionalize the profession of teaching. As they are all businessmen who know nothing of the field, it goes without saying that you do not do this by giving teachers autonomy and respect. They use merit pay in which teachers whose students do well on bubble tests will receive more money and teachers whose students do not do so well on bubble tests will receive less money. Of course, the only way this could conceivably be fair is to have an identical group of students in each class—an impossibility. The real purposes of merit pay are to divide teachers against themselves as they scramble for the brighter and more motivated students and to further institutionalize the idiot notion of standardized tests. There is a certain diabolical intelligence at work in both of these.”
“If the Bloomberg administration can be said to have succeeded in anything,” he said, “they have succeeded in turning schools into stress factories where teachers are running around wondering if it’s possible to please their principals and if their school will be open a year from now, if their union will still be there to offer some kind of protection, if they will still have jobs next year. This is not how you run a school system. It’s how you destroy one. The reformers and their friends in the media have created a Manichean world of bad teachers and effective teachers. In this alternative universe there are no other factors. Or, all other factors—poverty, depraved parents, mental illness and malnutrition—are all excuses of the Bad Teacher that can be overcome by hard work and the Effective Teacher.”
The truly educated become conscious. They become self-aware. They do not lie to themselves. They do not pretend that fraud is moral or that corporate greed is good. They do not claim that the demands of the marketplace can morally justify the hunger of children or denial of medical care to the sick. They do not throw 6 million families from their homes as the cost of doing business. Thought is a dialogue with one’s inner self. Those who think ask questions, questions those in authority do not want asked. They remember who we are, where we come from and where we should go. They remain eternally skeptical and distrustful of power. And they know that this moral independence is the only protection from the radical evil that results from collective unconsciousness. The capacity to think is the only bulwark against any centralized authority that seeks to impose mindless obedience. There is a huge difference, as Socrates understood, between teaching people what to think and teaching them how to think. Those who are endowed with a moral conscience refuse to commit crimes, even those sanctioned by the corporate state, because they do not in the end want to live with criminals—themselves.
“It is better to be at odds with the whole world than, being one, to be at odds with myself,” Socrates said.
Those who can ask the right questions are armed with the capacity to make a moral choice, to defend the good in the face of outside pressure. And this is why the philosopher Immanuel Kant puts the duties we have to ourselves before the duties we have to others. The standard for Kant is not the biblical idea of self-love—love thy neighbor as thyself, do unto others as you would have them do unto you—but self-respect. What brings us meaning and worth as human beings is our ability to stand up and pit ourselves against injustice and the vast, moral indifference of the universe. Once justice perishes, as Kant knew, life loses all meaning. Those who meekly obey laws and rules imposed from the outside—including religious laws—are not moral human beings. The fulfillment of an imposed law is morally neutral. The truly educated make their own wills serve the higher call of justice, empathy and reason. Socrates made the same argument when he said it is better to suffer wrong than to do wrong.
“The greatest evil perpetrated,” Hannah Arendt wrote, “is the evil committed by nobodies, that is, by human beings who refuse to be persons.”
As Arendt pointed out, we must trust only those who have this self-awareness. This self-awareness comes only through consciousness. It comes with the ability to look at a crime being committed and say “I can’t.” We must fear, Arendt warned, those whose moral system is built around the flimsy structure of blind obedience. We must fear those who cannot think. Unconscious civilizations become totalitarian wastelands.
“The greatest evildoers are those who don’t remember because they have never given thought to the matter, and, without remembrance, nothing can hold them back,” Arendt writes. “For human beings, thinking of past matters means moving in the dimension of depth, striking roots and thus stabilizing themselves, so as not to be swept away by whatever may occur—the Zeitgeist or History or simple temptation. The greatest evil is not radical, it has no roots, and because it has no roots it has no limitations, it can go to unthinkable extremes and sweep over the whole world.”
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


179 Comments so far
Show AllA democracy relies upon citizens who can ask critical questions. Under "No Child's Behind Left" (Palast), only bubble tests are allowed to ask questions.
On a second front, school is made so much drearier than TV and violent video games: they are the New American Educational System.
Good point.
All true. Thank you for this Mr. Hedges. It breaks my heart and makes me despair for a future in America with any quality in life. Teachers have protested and we need what.. the people to shut down the bad government and bad corporations-because we can’t trust politicians? Democrats whipped it after Bush (Obama and Duncan with carrots and Race to the Bottom.) Teachers are victimized and don’t understand- of course, most are rational good people. It’s tough to estimate the degree of this evil and those who intend it and the harm it projects. Thanks again- I always read your work.
Please check out Madfloridian on Dem Underground. She writes a journal that posts new assaults on education and teaching almost daily.
China will eat our lunch in a few more years anyway, so it's highly unlikely that anything we do will make any difference in the long run. I studied to be a secondary teacher in the 1970's, but never pursued the profession. I'm happy now that I didn't. Teaching these days is at best a poorly paid, thankless task that is not at all appreciated ......
I totally agree about the China-thing. It's possible in the lifetime of some people alive today that China will begin outsourcing labor to the USA.
? Do you REALLY believe the Chinese are that stupid? Unles they were to eliminate half their population, I don't see them 'out-sourcing' anything. They are in the process of purchasing vast tracts of land to grow food, and may our-source some of that, but for the most part China will do what it can to keep it's population busy enough to be too tired to rebel. The perception there is that Americans are too fat and lazy to put out good products.
BUT, to give YOUR point credence, I remember when we here in America viewed all Japanese products as inferior, so I could be wrong.
China is currently outsourcing labor to Vietnam and Cambodia, maybe other countries. Where I currently live, most factories are hiring, looking for workers because there just are not enough.
The economy is booming in China and stuttering in America, in other words, wages are rising in China and falling in America. One day, those lines on a graph may cross.
BTW, Chinese love American products. Example: lots of peanuts here, good peanuts of many varieties. Two days ago, I received a package from a friend in the US, he sent me some things as a gesture of kindness. Anyway, one of the things he sent was a jar of generic roasted peanuts packaged in Texas. All of my family and friends here think they are better than the Chinese peanuts, while I think the Chinese peanuts are much better.
Dizi,
Joke aside, I still like American's peanut and now have to settle with Shandong's peanut as they are bigger.
I agree about the 'search engine' results, but many Chinese have VPN's (not illegal here). The discontent here are a small minority and the government here, IMHO, is doing all it can to maintain 'domestic tranquility'. I may not agree with everything the government does here, but look at the US - groups supporting peace are infiltrated by g-men, environmental groups, same same. It's all the same in my book. I try not to worry about TPTB, but focus locally to make my life and the life of those around me to be as good as possible given the circumstances.
I know a lot of happy, peaceful, content people both here in China and in the place I call home in the US. I do not know any politically unhappy people here in China, but know many people in America who actually hate, I mean really hate a lot of the government and politicians in the US. I can only assume, because I do not listen to Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter et al, but they are, IMHO, some of hate-filled teachers of some of my friends in the US.
Dizi,
I still remember you from our last encountered. Quite possible, the rate we're going.
How's the weather there now? Without telling me exactly where, can you tell me which part. I had travel mostly along the coastal areas as far North.
I'm just north of Macao in the Jiangmen district. The weather, warm and dry, we could use some rain after a cold, wet winter and spring.
I walk every day, to the market, the stores and it still amazes me the number of small businesses and the amount of business they do.
I'm 54 and still enjoy seeing young, cute chicks (a habit my wife tolerates, it's a running joke between us). Anyway, on any given day, the streets are full of young girls/ladies, may of them very fashionable. On Friday and Saturday nights, WOW! The factories are shut down for a day or two and the youth (I estimate the 16-30 year old crowd) flood the streets. Most seem very happy, very upbeat. I keep a small writing pad with me at all times and often write about what I see and my thoughts - this is an example from a few days ago: There's a lot of "life" here - new life, old life, life life and a lot of it. Never have I been anywhere, where so many gals are either pregnant or with a newborn. I really think China has a bright future if the government can put and keep intelligent, moral people in charge. There's so much opportunity here.
Anyway, I'm a Southern China-ner. Never been to the Northern part, only around Guangdong Province.
Dizi,
Thanks. :-)
Obama keeps saying that he wants to look forward and not back. I viewed it only in the context of protecting the criminals that have raped our country. Now I also see it in the context of erasing history and the ability of analytical thought processes of our young people. Orwell's playbook in action.
Standardization lead to stagnation.
And specialization, or more commonly, compartmentalization. Nothing “whole” or in context. Deductive, reduced. Loss of inductive reasoning..the big picture..
Kind of hard to take seriously anyone ranting about teachers who can't correctly form a plural.
Good post. A good indicator that Hedges was "out of his depth" was that most of the article consisted of lengthy and eloquent quotations of teachers (making one wonder why it wasn't they that authored the article) until the end where Hedges riffs on some Greek philosophers - his home turf. While Hedges' piece could have been better written and researched, I generally agree with what he is saying. The whole education "reform" movement isn't really about education at all (that is a distraction); it is about breaking the last large organized part of the working class.
I watched the RSA Animate's (your link) presentation of Sir Ken Robinson's thinking. I had one problem with it: it seems to portray the problems of education as a result of a flaw in the thinking about education rather that the result of an educational system that was created to serve the interests of capital. There are certainly plenty of reasons for a paradigm shift in how we educate, however, until we have an economic system that is made to serve the interests of the majority of the world's population - instead of capitalism - our educational system will not serve the interests of most people or serve education.
You see, you exemplify the very problem we have with our education systems and society.
You have been taught to read.....but you have no capacity to think and understand what you've read.....just react in the usual shameful, false, self-serving way.
likeitornot,
Unfortunately for you, the educational system failed you and left you only semi-literate.
As the other responses indicate, to your typical complaining about articles describing what's happened to our dilapidated education system, you were obviously such a failure in school that all you can do now is blame teachers, their unions, and anyone else capable of knowing what an apostrophe is or how to form plural nouns, spell with even a modicum of skill, or read with understanding. Still mad at that English teacher who flunked you? Grow up, clown.
"The Gnostics had a term germane to the shallowness of thought that passes for discourse in our time, political or otherwise -- "hylicism," which means an inability to see below the surface of things."--Phil Rockstroh **
*****
By the way, the current Rockstroh essay appearing on CD today also quite accurately describes people like you. I'd suggest you read it, but I doubt you are capable of garnering the introspection necessary to comprehend it.
** http://www.counterpunch.org/rockstroh03162011.html
What article were YOU reading? Your comment, riddled with errors, sounds more like a dittohead knee-jerk reaction. You're rather making Hedges' point.
If you follow his comments in these threads for even a few days you'll see how he ALWAYS makes Hedges' point. He's got more tea party characteristics than anything that might be considered progressive. And he's always bashing on teachers and unions. Just another semi-literate reactionary.
likeitornot used to post under Thomas More / Henry8 / prometheus / mightymite. He loves to bash teachers, at any and every opportunity.
What galls him, is that those things that he supports, rote learning, one dimensional history, etc, are precisely the thingst that Hedges is criticising. Hence the whine.
Bloody pitiful display, indeed, likeitornot. Glad you assessed your own post so clearly, because I was caught up with you illiteracy until you wrote that last line.
There is no conscious dumbing down of America. The present education system is not a ploy of capitalists to gain a pliable workforce. In fact, education has NEVER emphasized critical thinking, creativity, reflection, or problem solving. It has always stressed memorization and "received knowledge," knowledge contained in textbooks written by authors of little note.
The fact is: people--including capitalists--do not care about education as it is practiced in public schools. They DO see schools as a companies with "student achievement" scores as the dollars that measure success and the public as shareholders--that is true. But the goals of education have been unchanged for the last hundred years: training for jobs, socialization into society, patriotism, the value of teamwork through sports and other activities. Note that the goal never has been the development of a population capable of discernment or reflection. It never has been that way and it isn't that way now. Paranoid notions that managers wish to create a Brave New World of deltas are way off base.
Thank you for these comments. It is too easy to weave disparate elements into a conspiracy. Three of my Aunts graduated from high school in the 1920's. Two got civil-service jobs and the third worked as a lab technician at a hospital. Considering how few people graduated from high school at that time, the education they received was quite good - but it was based on rote learning.
The education I received in high school (I graduated in 1956) was a bit broader, in that to pass the NY State Regents exams for most courses we had to write one, and sometimes two essays. Writing a coherent essay requires a bit more than rote learning, but we still memorized a lot of things and took a lot of multiple-choice tests. To the extent that I can tell, things have not changed much since then.
Part of the problem with evaluating the education students receive today is that we are judging the kids on the basis of what we have learned since we got out of school. (Read The Education of Henry Adams) Living a life teaches someone a lot of skills and commonsense that cannot be taught formally. It is not useful to condemn them for not being able to do things that we could not do when we were their age. And it makes less sense to condemn teachers for not teaching them things that cannot be taught.
A student of history, I look at the curriculum taught in the early twentieth century and am amazed at how narrowly focused it was. Latin. Chemistry. Government. English. I obtained the text for Government and found it was written at quite an advanced level, indicating only the better students were graduating from high school. The vast majority of them were "college prep" students, vocational and agricultural concentrations not representing more than fifteen or twenty percent. The texts in science did not emphasize problem solving and "inquiry" was something unheard-of.
I feel cynical enough about the human species to say that thinking is not rewarded by the society-at-large and frequently it is punished. Perhaps that is why it is so rare--not only among students but among teachers. If parents really want to inflict thinking upon their offspring, they will have to do it themselves.
drosera,
"I feel cynical enough about the human species to say that thinking is not rewarded by the society-at-large and frequently it is punished. Perhaps that is why it is so rare--not only among students but among teachers." Unfortunately too many teachers do not seem to have the ability to "think" other than to regurgitate back what the state and district powers that be want. I have found that in general teachers can be quite conservative (conservative not in the negative sense but in that they believe in the system as it is and can't see above, beyond, around or through it).
I will be emailing it to our staff and I doubt that I will get a single reply or comment back. As a matter of fact I have been brought up in the "Principal's Advisory Committee" as sending too many emails that some of the more vocal teachers believe are a waste of time. As I told my principal, "I expect you to stand up for me as they all deal with education and that if I were principal I would be questioning having staff members who were not willing to read and learn as much as possible." Overall he has backed me.
OYE
Frequently administrators are hired on the basis of their willingness to buy into the status quo or into the faux reform efforts of politicians like Arne Duncan or Bill Gates. Thoughtfulness is definitely not a trait most of them have. I did have one principal who read writers I respect in education. His main job, the way he saw it, was to keep the downtown administrators out of our hair, enabling us to do good things in the classroom. He was not cut out the mold of NCLB administrators, a self-serving crowd that trumpeted their students' test score improvements to their clientele. Why do they remind me of Barack Obama who praises deficit reduction rather than, say, a reduction in poverty or in the infant mortality rate? Could it be that both the President and sycophantic administrators choose measures unrelated to real successes?
In addition to dumbing down education, is the fact that drugs are available in every city and town in the US...another form of mind-numbing... plus the making of criminals. The only "challenge" is locating the dealer or robbing the home medicine or liquor cabinet. Then with a few clicks we can text, twitter, or flip channels to vacuous "entertainment," such as selective or slanted news, hearing about the lives of dysfunctional celebrities, or watch people "survive" or win thousands of dollars for doing nothing. A completely polluted social system...
You're forgetting the legal drug pushers- the doctors who prescribe serious anti-depressants, ADHD and other emotion-tampering medications to children, numbing them into zombies, all sanctioned by the FDA. Make sure and feed them Frankenfood loaded with dyes, sugar, and chemicals, too. That quickens the mental decline.
Hmmm
Obviously a bit biased but your point is well made. Over 25 years ago my mother was a teacher of the "gifted and talented" in a prosperous suburb of Boston. She only lasted 3 years in this capacity. Her downfall? This is a quote from the Superintendent
"do your realize what you are doing? you are teaching these kids to think" Needless to say she was forced out of teaching. She retired as a Librarian.
People public schools have always stressed obedience and wrote memorization over critical thinking. The only difference now is that it is out in the open. It is VERY important to contrast this with the elite PRIVATE schools. Private schools continue to stress critical and analytical thinking. Questioning the status quo is the norm. Asking why or why not is NOT grounds for ridicule and punishment. Clearly what is good for the goose is NOT good for the gander. Wake up people!!
"Obviously a bit biased but ..."
???
Please write a critique explaining how the article is biased. Thanks.
I've witnessed CSAP testing in Colorado first hand working as a middle school social worker for Denver Public Schools. CSAP is a method for the Colorado Department of Education to rate schools as satisfactory or not based on standardized tests given each year to students in grades 3 through 11.
A school which is rated unsatisfactory for three years in a row can be closed down and converted into a charter school run by a corporation (these charted schools usually do not outperform the original school they've replaced BTY). The private tyrannies running the charter schools are handed publicly built facilities to profit off of our children's education, normally without any improvement.
The entire year's curriculum at my school is currently based around preparing students for this test. You can then imagine that teachers are very restricted and regimented in what they can teach and very stressed out around testing time.
In my school, over 95% of the student body are on a free lunch program, and a majority of students speak English as a second language. So there are numerous cultural and social aspects that need to be addressed before teachers can begin to focus on these standardized tests. Of course they have performed poorly for years now and could be shut down in the 2011-2012 school year.
My point is, helping students learn how to question the status quo is the last thing concerning these teachers as they prepare their various curriculums. It's turned into a matter of survival for the schools and the teachers alike and they are not given the freedom to give their students the skills to think about issues critically.
I work with the Poor. A woman came in one day to request food for herself and her family. She used to be an Elementary School Teacher. She taught for 9 years then took a year off to bond with her new daughter. When she reapplied for a Teaching job a year later she was not hired. The Administration told her that she had too much experience. She would cost them too much to hire again. So she has cleaned houses for the past 3 years.
Those who seek to dominate are using Propaganda to take the word "Experience" and turn it into "Seniority" and then turn "Seniority" into a Dirty word.They try to indirectly indicate that those with Seniority are old and not as able a Teacher as those just out of College with no experience.
And we all know that we would feel more comfortable with a Doctor with no experience operating on us. Yeah Right!!
Good post, thank you.
Nice one, Chris...
The model the US appears to be setting up for its "school system" is the "Industrial school" model. This was used to "educate" many first nations peoples and orphans in the period from 1880 right through to 1970.
AS defined by a US bureaucrat the purpose was to "train the indians to a position suitable to THEIR station" That is so that they could be employed as low wage workers in lumber mills, on mines and farms or as maids and janitors.
They would be trained to accept their status and not question their "betters" or the system. In the Native residential school system this was helped along by teaching only the White version of history wherein the students parents and families were deemed a threat to the system by maintaining old cultural traditions.
If one looks to Arizona where Ethnic Studies is being phased out of schools it the exact same process. One is trained to believe or accept that their own culture/tradtions is inferior thus ones social status must remain inferior.
The Public school system is being transformed into that Industrial School System . The Private school system will be one that offers differing levels of education based upon "Ability to pay". This will ensure a Class based system of the wealthy elite and their servants remains in place for the forseeable future.
The educational systems purpose as seen by the Capitalist class is not the betterment of the Citizens of a Country, it is for the enhancement of profits flowing to that Capitalist class. The Citizen is little more then a "resource" to be exploited and used.
Good post!
Interesting posts: GW North, SWZA, Hummingbird, Corvo (12:49 pm), OLD GOAT, & ATOMSK (1:11)
I think Hedges made a brilliant case here, yet I'd like to expand this exposure to also include similar inroads into UNI-FORMITY as blatantly seen in the following:
1. Courts: Judges are handed "sentencing guidelines" that arguably throw away their basis for judicial experience, not to mention intelligence, through the imposition of strict norms. These primarily refer to the "drug war."
2. Media: The same talking points are reinforced from pundit to pundit as if no other views exist, nor might be considered.
3. Centrist Politics: The quaint notion of both sides agreeing throws the necessary tension between positions aside. Thus this expensive farce also serves the purpose of uniformity as seen in powerful decision-making circles. Most in this forum are keen to the obvious: that apart from style, the policy SUBSTANCE of both parties is equivalent.
Definition of centrist: A person who can wear the same shoe on either foot.
DROSERA: You should re-read the post by SWZA. Harper's did a very important study a few years ago relating how this uber: standard testing model would effectively toss public property (schools) into the waiting paws of private interests. It is about THE money! Education has been deteriorating!
While a certain amount of testing and specified curriculum was always the norm, one substantive change of late is the influx of corporate types into the school rooms making "business" based decisions about the "resource" of young minds. The parameters have altered.
Nice to see a few thinkers on the threads today.
I agree - Hedges can really inspire some healthy activity.
There is also a flip side to "memorization": what one memorizes makes all the difference in the world. For instance there are complex linguistic/biological bodies of knowledge that are 'committed to memory' by various traditional indigenous peoples and interwoven in paradigms of traditional lands and multiple modalities in addition to classroom study. This creates a body of science, applicable technologies and linguistic complexity all based in socio-spiritual day-to-day life.
A couple of additional thoughts - schisms implemented by capital/profit model (externalized/extractive) do not plague the psyche and functionality, except where they are imposed from the outside - the legacy of colonialism, and being intensified by neo-colonialism monoculture and massive scale infrastructure model of development; there is profound weight placed on dignity - the integrity of coherence and sustainability.
It may be about the money, but the goals of education are unchanged--for-profit charters are no different from public schools. Chris Hedges believes corporate interests are intentionally dumbing down education to form a compliant population. I say, they don't need to: Critical thinking has never been important in American schooling. A certain amount of lip service has been paid to it, but no real effort has been made (except in the sixties when mathematics and science education was overhauled).
Surely this is one of Hedges' best.
I agree.
I never learned anything in school....most teachers are just too common to teach anyone how to think outside the box...original IDEAS are in short supply everywhere
Original crappy ideas are in great abundance. Look at popular music and art.
The true nature of ignorance is not that the ignorant know nothing, but rather that all they think they know is false.
Hedges just gets better and better. I agree 100% with what he says here.
It's a dark and terifying road we are on. How will all this end up, I wonder? I hope, fervently hope, but truly fear, that life on earth will end up like the plot of some bad science fiction movie or B-grade video game.
well spoken chris!
sad, indeed, that our corporate misleaderdship has for the being brought, bribed and coerced an entire nation into accepting its narrow definition of success. the very meaning of life "to constantly increase profits" is at the best, as you say, chris, AMORAL! in time, however, as we define the meaning of life and successful living only in monetary terms, the human mind rationalizes that immoral behavior, spying, lying...and worse...as good business ethics because they serve the profit motive. once we judge success in mere terms of financial wealth admiring the false image excellence projected by a silk tie an armani suit, that old "moral compass" atrophies and shrivels on the vine. that old adage, crime doesn't pay"? well, if those crimes against Nature and our fellow man are committed behind the scenes that's just smart good business. if money be our only goal we turn the world upside down and all here understand, the only sin is getting caught. during the messed up response to katrina, i heard #43 promise to rebuild n'awlins with casinos and businesses to bring the tourist dollars back creating jobs to bring workers and their families back. i turned to my younger son with a puzzled expression and asked, " did he say one word about rebuilding the school system? families need schools, you know."
the most important responsibility we adults have is to offer our children a comprehensive and well-balanced education. yet, throughout my entire life, public educators have struggled against those who use the system as a political football, an opportunity to score points in an election campaign. right now, i'm seeing the idea of replacing warm-blooded teacher with a standardized cool computer model. we the people are being marginalized. "welcome to the machine!"
LEADERSHIP: i'm haunted by a recruiting ad i saw about a year ago, (notice the military no longer needs to recruit?)--in which a young man stood at the head of a line of parachuted young men at the ready. as this "leader" stood by the open door of the army plane, he waved his hand inviting each in turn to jump. the ad touted "we teach leadership!" bull-ongna! the kid only blindly followed the program. our nation of lemmings has fallen under the rule of numerous top down hierarchies vying for economic control. this amoral, no immoral--creed of greed cannot be sustained. what the idiots who have stepped upon a pedestal of their own construct and donned the mantel of superiority fail to grasp is that their game of jenga, taking wealth from the bottom, then from the middle, now from the upper middle, must as any top-heavy construct fall, collapsing under its own arrogantly blind weight. our society is in a landslide and those at the top of the mountain (blasting those purple majesties our of existence for profit)--fail to see that the ground is slipping from under their highly polished, tasseled shoes. soon people having nothing left to lose, no occupation to enrich the quality of life, no wonderful memories of that teacher who made a difference, will grow restless disrupting the very "law and order" of the machine.
teach the children well, buy them books, educational toys, spend time listening to your kids, grandkids, nephews and nieces. the chaos cannot help but expand as our misguided, nonsensical and unsustainable american dream of more, more, more material wealth falls to harsh reality. "people who need people are the luckiest people"
eventually--don't know how many generations it'll take humanity can begin the
tabula rasa!