Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Threat of America's Nativist Far Right
While Peter King holds hearings on homegrown jihadists, the growing menace of white supremacist terror goes unremarked
As emerging reports would have it, Kevin William Harpham, 36, who is accused of setting a bomb to go off at the Martin Luther King Jr Day parade in Spokane, Washington, was yet another "lone wolf" terrorist, acting at his own behest and on his own behalf. Even groups on the racist, radical far right that so clearly inspired him are rushing to disown and denounce the indicted man. Regardless of whether he was a "member" of an organised group, there can yet be no doubt that Harpham saw himself as part of a movement – one that has an especially broad reach in the age of Obama, and roots as deep as American culture itself.
Nineteen of those killed were aged under five in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, which before 9/11 was the deadliest terrorist attack in US history. (Photograph: Porter/Keystone USA/Rex Features)
The vision of a black president has given the racist far right one of its biggest boosts since the civil rights era of the 1960s. Figures toted up by the Southern Poverty Law Centre suggest a dramatic rise in the numbers of organized groups: their numbers grew by 40% from 2008 to 2009, and an additional 22% from 2009 to 2010, bringing the total to 2,145 groups. It's difficult to know precisely what these numbers mean, since these groups are constantly changing names, dissolving, reforming or springing up, and few of them maintain public membership rolls. What is nonetheless clear is that a strong far right movement has re-emerged, and what unites it is the age-old American doctrine of nativism, born out of fear of some dark outsider sneaking in to steal the white man's homeland and his hegemony.
Nativist thinkers are spread all over the map, but the strongest current comes in the form of the Sovereign Citizen movement, or what used to be called the Posse Comitatus and before the posse, the Silver Shirts. For the old Posse adherents and their contemporary progeny, the white Aryan man is the only true "sovereign" over his land and his life. White women serve beneath him; black and brown "mud people" are menials worthy only of disdain; and Jews (who do not qualify as white) are usually behind it all, running the economic and financial systems through a worldwide Jewish conspiracy. They do not admit to being subject to the laws and dicates of the US government; they eschew social security, cars and drivers' licences, and won't pay taxes.
For the true sovereign, the sheriff is the highest legitimate law enforcement official in the land, and a jury of his (white male) peers the only legitimate government body. These beliefs are underpinned by the religion of Christian Identity, which claim white sovereigns are the direct descendants of the lost tribes of Israel, who on their long trek out of the Middle East made their way up through Scotland and Ireland over to the United States.
Different facets of the nativist movement have enjoyed periodic heydeys in 20th-century America – first in the 1910s and 20s, when anti-immigrant sentiments were rife and membership in the Ku Klux Klan reached more than 2m. In the 1930s and 1940s, they penetrated the edges of the political mainstream through figures like Father Charles Coughlin, who was the Glenn Beck of his day. A Catholic priest and radio personality, Coughlin was at once enormously popular and virulently antisemitic and anti-New Deal. His ally Gerald LK Smith, leader of the Share Our Wealth campaign, was evocative of some of today's more extreme Tea Party candidates.
The Klans and related groups had another resurgence in response to the civil rights movement of the 1960s. In the 1980s, groups like the Posse, which drew together white supremacy and Christian Identity with anti-government "patriot" sentiments, found particularly fertile ground for recruitment among dispossessed Midwestern farmers. While figures like David Duke ran for political office, others, like the violent group The Order, carried out bombings, bank robberies and murders, and engaged in blazing shootouts with federal agents, all in service of their plan to build a white homeland.
After the Oklahoma City bombing, with its perpetrators' ties to the militia movement (and, most likely, to other far right groups as well), the movement tended to dig in further underground. Just as Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols were deemed to be acting alone, the periodic bursts of far right violence – whether they be an attempted bombing, the murder of an abortion doctor, attacks on undocumented immigrants or on Muslims, or the shooting of a congresswoman – are attributed to "lone wolves" rather than to organised plots by any particular group. Yet the distinction belies the reality of a movement that has long encouraged its adherents to act in "leaderless resistance" cells or carry out one-man guerrilla attacks (and become celebrated as "Phineas Priests", named for the Bible story of a man who executed an interracial couple).
The alleged MLK Day parade bomber, Kevin William Harpham, may or may not have consider himself a lone wolf if, as he is accused, he put together a backpack bomb laden with shrapnel dipped in rat poison to induce bleeding and placed it on the route of the parade. But there can be little doubt as to where his inspiration came from. Bill Morlin, formerly a reporter for the Spokane Spokesman-Review and now an independent investigator, traced Harpham's background in a comprehensive report for the publication Hatewatch. In the military, Harpham was stationed at Fort Lewis in Washington, home base for 320 far right wingers. He was once a member of the racist far right National Alliance, and had left various postings on extremist websites suggesting he had had enough of the "international Jewish conspiracy", which, among other things, he held responsible for 9/11.
Leonard Zeskind, a leading expert on the radical far right and author, says that today, "the main tendency of organisations is mainstreaming … The movement imperative is towards the Tea Parties, running for office, anti-immigrant mongering – not roadside bombs." None of this, of course, prevents people from being "recruited" to their ideas and choosing to act on them. One far right leader said much the same in an interview following the attempted bombing in Spokane. "There are many aspects to the white supremacist movement," Shaun Winkler, Imperial Wizard of the White Knights of the KKK in Idaho, told a local television station. "There are those of us that are on the political side, and there are those of us that are revolutionary. It sounds as if this individual was on the revolutionary end rather than the political. And there are a lot of lone wolves out there. People that are sympathetic to us, but people that we don't know."
Historically, federal law enforcement has given little credence to the power of the nativist current in American society, and has paid relatively little attention to the activities of nativist groups. That has perhaps changed since the election of Barack Obama, whose presidency has so focused and emboldened the racist far right. Yet, despite their obvious threat, there are no competitors to Peter King, holding congressional hearings on the recruitment of homegrown jihadist terrorists.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



25 Comments so far
Show Allyou know i think it is not very important to be worried about what is nothing more than police work
if these guys are breaking the law the let the cops deal with them
serious people need to be focussed on bigger issues that abound all around us
like umpteen wars, poverty, health care, decent wages, the environment, nuclear weapons and nuclear energy, dwindling water resources and dwindling mineral resources
obsessing on the fringe is a distraction and by the way, lots of folks look at the liberals through the same prism of fear and worry
either way it is not what we should be worried about
going broke from bad health is a lot more likely than being blown up by a deluded psychotic, unless we are talking about obummer, that sumbitch will bomb anyone
Excellent comment!
I agree, we all have rights/ sorry privliges to associate with any group we want as long as we commit no crimes. Prople seem to forget this when convient.
Personally i want them out where i can see them, not hiding in the woods, schemeing and making crazy plans on how they can get attention, from a socity that shuns them.
I can take most any crazyness they spew, as an american I see it's their right. La Raza insults me all the time, black superemists groups insult my tastes, but they have a right to exist.. Again I want them out where I can see them.
Back when I was in the south, people had old style confederate flags on their vehicles, identifying themselves! I like that. I want to know where their coming from.
>^^<
If Harpham had been a Muslim he would have been excoriated 24/7 on Foxy News and the whore MSM; if the guy in Tuscon, Az. that shot Giffords and others had been a Muslim he would have been demonized unmercifully; if Timothy Mcveigh.... , well you get the picture, too many to name. Just asking: how come the nut cases on the far right are always " lone wolfs" but the nut cases on the left, are almost always tied to some terrorist group ? JFK, MLK, RFK, were all claimed to have been assassinated by lone nuts. Enough said.
paul: the "lone gunman" is a favorite of the intelligence network
let's add lincoln to the list - he too was killed by the proverbial lone gunman
the 19 arab boys of 9/11 acted metaphorically as a lone gunman too
when the intelligence community gets a storyline that works they sure stick with it
some of their other favorites include: suicide, single car crashes and small plane crashes
hmmmm......
He shot and killed in cold blood... isn't that enough? don't they have rope in Az. if not I can give them some!
>^^<
I take issue with using the term 'nativist'. These are not healthy natives but profoundly damaged individuals intent on isolating themselves from anything that could be native.
The hate is similar to cancer - a viral presence that, giving way to potentially fatal dysfunctional expansion, is a variety of the spiritual kind.
The profound denial/ignorance of the fact that Christ was a Judaic prophet reflects one of the roots of the disease. Granted these characters are not alone in the destructive stoking of their distortion of normative spiritual message of Christ.
It is one of the places where pain, anger and intensification of trauma becomes first projected in rigid goals born of paranoia because the immediate environment by nature does not resonate with the extreme internal dissonance in negation; and eventually if left unmitigated, erupts in a violence of denial from failure to acknowledge the intrinsic and irremediable isolation.
I have to keep reminding myself that popular appreciation of just what trauma is remains hardly seen and rarely recognized. Were that not the case, wars would stop in a heartbeat.
You hit the nail right on the head. Now, if you want to see the same exact phenomenon at work, visit the Ha'aretz and take the time to read the articles and, in particular, the poster comments. The same madness that is affecting the US is reigning over Israel and its citizenry. Coincidence?
Peter King quoted as saying this Country has not been threaten by radical hate groups. Talk about a lie. Remember the Christian Radical Right Wing Group that wanted to kill Police Officers. As a member of the Law Enforcement Community It is amazing when you attend seminars on Homeland Security that they never seem to want to address these Patriot Groups, and dare not call any of them Christian Terrorist Groups.
Nothing new, lot's of black groups want to kill cops, la raza doesn't mind if you kill white cops and border guards. Let'em talk, so I know who they are!
>^^<
King's Islamophobe panels have a little bit more to do with the politics of the MIC than religion itself even if that is the tool being used to further the agenda. As the ME goes up in pro-democracy flames and the US starts to lose grip, the MIC also sees the cash cow of "terrorism" drying up and they're not about to let that happen. In comes King with Islamophobia and CNN doing programs on the "Muslim next door" and the frenzy is all stirred up again, cementing all the benefits of the War of Terror even if the "terrorists" are busy at the time, fighting and liberating themselves from their US-backed dictators. Amerikans are stupid at the core and will just think or say whatever the teevee tells them to without paying attention to what is happening in the real world which negates everything they are told. And that is where religion comes in, anybody that can believe the story of an invisibly sky dweller knocking up a virgin by remote control and then whacking his own kid so that...blah blah blah because "he loves you" and all that will believe anything they're told.
the bombing of the Murray building features a number of oddities that would question the 'lone wolf' theory...
like witnesses claiming explosions were occurring from within the building, implying they were placed prior to the event...
why does that sound so familiar?
the media is designed to lie...
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Try reading =A Peoples History of the United States= by Howard Zinn.
Father Coughlin came from Canada. His nightly, network, radio attacks upon FDR were designed to jeopardize his reelection chances in 1936 - and it worked. In June, polls showed FDR at 50/50 percent. In October, Joe Kennedy accepted the cost of having Vatican Sec. State, Cardinal Pacelli come to the USA with an entourage. Joe then hired a DC-3 and 2 pilots for a month. Pacelli =gagged= the Detroit Radio Priest, then he and Bishop Spellman flew to every US city with a large Catholic population, shilling FDR in November. U.S. Catholics knew that Pacelli would probably be the next Pope, so they listened!
THAT is how Joe Kennedy earned his appointment to the Court of St. James's. The win was SUPPOSED to result in a full American ambassador to the Vatican - but FDR screwed Pacelli by merely appointing a Personal Envoy. This is one of the most overlooked double-crosses in world history. And mark these words: Pacelli was not someone to double-cross.
Trylon
How come the "NAACP" is considered benign, but the "NAAWP" would be racist?
l say rip down that stupid statue off the Jersey shore, send it back to the "Frogs", and repeal the "Emancipation Proclamation" TSWRA
They were all born here just like you! or are now against birthright citizenship now?? can't have it both ways! One way will do!
>^^<
The racists don't call themselves "nativists," those opposed to them call them that. "Nativist" does not mean "native" and\y more than the word "racist" is the same as "race." It means bigoted white people, and at one time it meant white protestant people, who want to see themselves and only themselves as "native."
Nativism in the United States
In the United States, anti-immigration views have a long history. U.S. nativism appeared in the late 1790s in reaction to an influx of political refugees from France and Ireland. After passage of the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798 it receded.
Nativism first gained a name and affected politics in mid-19th century United States because of the large inflows of immigrants from cultures that were markedly different from the existing American culture. Thus, nativists objected primarily to Roman Catholics (especially Irish American) because of their loyalty to the Pope and supposed rejection of American ideals.
Nativist movements included the American Party of the mid-19th Century (formed by members of the Know Nothing movement), the Immigration Restriction League of the early 20th Century, and the anti-Asian movements in the West, resulting in the Chinese Exclusion Act and the so-called "Gentlemen's Agreement" aimed at the Japanese.
http://nativist.askdefine.com/
I agree.
Maybe "neo-nativist" should be used as the pejorative term for those bigoted white gringo-come-latelys.
At least it assonates with "neo-liberal" and "neocon".
To where are these people native?
Please let's not adopt that term just because they do, if they do.
The term "nativist" has a long history, and is being used correctly here.
What exactly is bothering the 'nativists' among us? Occasionally, out in the blogosphere, an answer is offered. For example, today someone in Georgia, after killing a police officer, held 8 people hostage at gunpoint. mecanik-2009 mentions: "At some point someone is going to blame George Bush, Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh and the NRA for this one." The next response is usafirst1, who recommends: "I'd rather blame John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson for creating a society that paid indigents to breed."
"that paid indigents to breed": THAT is what we are fighting, folks. To the right, the 'great society' was a breeding ground for the least of Americans. These nutcases will not be satisfied until America is returned to her 'whites only' roots.