Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Peter King’s Muslim McCarthyism
New York Congressman Peter King’s so-called homeland security hearing on Muslim radicalization should surprise no one. We’ve been at war with Islam abroad for 10 years. It’s amazing it’s taken this long for the xenophobia and hate-mongering to be elevated to heroic status on Capitol Hill, where even the fringe the notion of Barack Obama as a Muslim fifth columnist still has currency. It’s all part of a long American tradition, rich in blood and bile.
This is a country partly built on the genocidal eradication of the Indian, on the enslavement of blacks for 300 years and the terrorizing and demonizing of blacks for another hundred. At the turn of the last century it was the “Yellow Peril” that led Congress to ban Asian immigration. In the 1920s, at a time when Jews were openly barred from colleges, clubs, restaurants and neighborhoods, Henry Ford was devoting page after page of his Michigan newspaper to battling what he perceived as the threat of Jewish radicalization in America, and dreaming of the day when the country would be cleansed of them. That was just warm-up for the mass hysteria of the 1950s when it was feared that Soviet communists, who had trouble keeping a light bulb functioning properly in Russia, would overrun the United States thanks to a few well-placed “infiltrators.” The Soviet threat has become the Muslim threat.
And to keep the bigots along the Mexican border happy, there’s always the “Brown Peril” to worry about, and goon brigades such as the “Minutemen Project” to meet brown skins with brown shirts. So Peter King, if anything, is a cliché, an elected, and therefore presumably more respectable reflection of our national prejudices. But the difference between him and, say, that radical nut Terry Jones, the Gainesville preacher who warms his religious bigotry to the fire of burning Korans, is just a different address.
If there is a “radicalization” problem in the United States, Muslims have better take a number. They’re vastly outnumbered. The odd attack with a Muslim at the trigger can’t be denied. We are a diverse country. But bullet for bullet, it’s safe to say that Muslims are more law-abiding than their more Christian brothers, at least stat wise.
“In an 11-day period this January,” the Southern Poverty Law Center reports, “a neo-Nazi was arrested headed for the Arizona border with a dozen homemade grenades; a terrorist bomb attack on a Martin Luther King Jr. Day parade in Spokane, Wash., was averted after police dismantled a sophisticated anti-personnel weapon; and a man who officials said had a long history of anti-government activities was arrested outside a packed mosque in Dearborn, Mich., and charged with possessing explosives with unlawful intent.” The same Dearborn where Henry Ford once spewed his anti-Semitism. “That’s in addition, the same month, to the shooting of U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in Arizona, an attack that left six dead and may have had a political dimension.”
Speaking of firebombing mosques, you may remember—or prefer not to remember—that the largest mosque in our own backyard, the Islamic Center of Northeast Florida in Jacksonville, was the target of a firebombing last year, while 60 worshipers were inside. And that it took place during the orchestrated vilification of a prominent member of the Muslim community, Pervez Ahmed, whose nomination to the city’s human rights commission was almost derailed by the hate-mongering of Act for America!, the organization led by Brigitte Gabriel, a Christian Lebanese turned American Islamophobe, and one of Peter King’s advisers.
Just last month in St. Petersburg, Bradley Strott, a 52-year-old whose Christian credentials must surely be impeccable, was arguing religion with another man when, finding out that that man was a Muslim, grabbed him by the shirt and stabbed him in the neck. Naturally, the Florida Legislature never missing an opportunity to fuel intolerance where it could foster it, is joining the Oklahoma bandwagon against Sharia law, which has about as much influence in Florida as the ACLU does in Saudi Arabia. It’s not about sense. It’s about hate.
That, too, should not surprise you. Florida has the distinction of being the forwarding address to 49 hate groups, third-most after California and Texas. These include neo-Nazis, the Ku Klux Klan, white nationalists, black separatists, a chapter of the Jewish Defense League and neo-Confederates, though the list has yet to be updated to include the likes of Muslim-bashing Terry Jones.
Let’s not be disproportionate about hate’s constituency, either. We may have a long tradition of bigotry. We also have an equally long tradition of justice and fairness and clear-eyed denunciations of the worst in human impulses. Peter King is merely a reminder that radicals don’t always wear white hoods and burn crosses in grassy yards. They also wear ties, pander to the media and hold congressional hearings.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


27 Comments so far
Show AllPeter "King" of the Jews is using these hearings to audition for the Messiah. He's bribed by the Zionists, his primary constituency, to resurrect McCarthyism. The "King" of the Jews represents Zionism 1st, at the expense of the American taxpayer.
Bogi,
I think you got to the heart of the matter.
If you spew enough hatred, even a suppporter of the IRA, as Peter King is, can be elected to congress. http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/1057.html
Yeah, racism has always been alive and well in America. The trend has not changed. The recent story about NPR shows just how deep it goes. Obviously people there at the top have a serious thing against white, republican christians. And I'm not here to defend the bad apples, or the good ones for that matter, as religion is not my thing, but, just sayin'...
Yes, can there be any more persecuted group in America today than white, heterosexual Christian males?
Sarcasm aside, moonpie's comment does highlight a glaring omission from the main article - there is no mention of the media-fueled sense of victimhood felt by the most privileged sections of society.
This is a new McCarthy era as the Progressive magazine has been saying for some time and worse than the last one. Peter King is silly, but republicans in Northern Ireland aren't. Don't judge them by that jack ass. They wan't one Ireland united and free. They surely have as much and more right to that than Germany had a right to one Germany united and free. Ireland never started any world wars.
Do read even what the BBC has had to say about the IRA. John Major, the British Conservative primie minister had talks going on with them behind the scenes for years before November 1993, and the BBC revealed that. That's the way a diplomatic settlement could go through in Northern Ireland. Let's get real.
Gerry Adams has also got too much bad publicity he didn't deserve. The Unionist thugs in Northern Ireland the BBC revealved had many plots to assassinate him and one in which they sprayed his care in the middle of Belfast with bulllets. Also read about the secret and dirty war waged by Mi5 against all republicans in Northern Ireland as revealed by the BBC. MI5 ued death squads to even kill a republican lawyer right in front of his wife.
True enough about the IRA. The irony, though, is that the man leading this witch-hunt approves of terrorist tactics.
Having a war about religion, is like killing folks to prove who has the best imaginary friend.
Or this oxymoron: We are going to kill all you Muslims to prove we have the Deity on our side and our Christian religion is better than your Muslim religion. John Lennon had it right. " Imagine there are no country's; it isn't hard to do, nothing to kill or die for, and no religion too".
he and his ilk are simply nurturing real anit-semitism.
one can only dream they finish each other off.
I say we chip in and hire the best exorcist money can buy.
Oh, it's a long shot-- but King has exactly the sort of bumptious, addle-pated wingnut demagogue personality most vulnerable to being possessed by the demonic restless spirit of Senator Joseph McCarthy.
It is well known and documented that P King was labeled a terrorist at one time for his collaboration with the IRA. One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
The recent ravings that Congressman King is having in Washington DC should be an affront to all Americans. His attack on the Muslims is no better then the attack on any persons religion or culture. It is very denigrating to have these ugly hearings that bring shame on Congressman King or others who use bigotry or hate to persue their agenda.
Religious and Racial, Cultural and Gender Bigotry is alive and well in 2011 unfortunately. It is the root of the constant attacks on our President and any of his policies. I donate to the SLPC because I really care of whats going on in these United States now and could lead to a new modern Civil War.
These King hearings need to stop and hearings on a dialog for peace is a whole lot better and smarter.
If you look at the recent history of the United States since 1960 we have lost Dr. Martin Luther King, John F Kennedy, Robert Kennedy all by murder and now look at our society today on March 12, 2011. We have moved to the abyss and that is really scary.
Demondade49: I think you are absolutely right. What is so hard about spreading Peace? It would certainly be a lot cheaper than spreading "democracy", wouldn't it? And cutting government spending is so gosh-darn important, isn't it? Oh wait, I know, it makes too much sense! Also, spreading Peace might cause you and I to love our neighbor, and to do unto him only what we would do unto ourselves. That simply would not do, especially if our neighbor is brown-skinned, or speaks a language other than "American", or does not thump the "Christian" bible.
"We have moved to the abyss and that is really scary." Yes.
It turns out that in 1963 JFK was telling the Zionists not to continue with their nuclear bomb program. Surprisingly the Israeli Zionists were opposed to JFK. The reason I mention this is because it added another to the list of interests that would like to get rid of Kennedy. This is in addition to the Military, CIA, FBI, Cubans, oil men, Nixon, LBJ and these are just the obvious. JFK stopped the US warmongers from starting 3 nuclear wars that they were urgently pressuring for. Bay of Pigs, Berlin Wall, Cuban missile crisis and the Mad Bomber Curtis Le May was leading the chorus along with the militarists in and out of government. JFK had to be killed because he was able to stand up to the Militarists and they had to remove him and RFK as well along with MLK. They were impediments to the aspirations to conduct nuclear wars by the warmongers. Their is a brief biography of JFK, rarely shown. and it lays the rational for the assassin conspiracy and its cover up. Johnson of course owed the Pentagon/warmongers for his becoming president because they were involved in the conspiracy. It was LBJ who convinced JFK to go to Texas. He rode in the car behind JFK. J. Edgar Hoover called George H.W.Bush right after the assassination to inform him. Bush was not in the government then but knew the oil interests. After the assassination, Jackie Kennedy exclaimed "they killed him", indicating she knew of the dangers. This is probably the reason she married the Greek and moved to Greece to protect her children from harms way. As for the "they" she knew since they had killed the President, killing her children would be easy.
a sign hangs on peter king's door.
it reads: "out to lynch"
Jackie did it!!!! Means (paid for by Onasis), motive ( ah like gimme a break...... JFK, was that a pickle in his pocket? ) and opportunity ( look closely at the film and you can see Jackie hand off the pistol she used for the cou de gras.) John-John was on his way to finally blow the story when he was put on that plane and sent out to sea. Now my life is in danger , but as an old man l have nothing to lose.
"New York Republican Peter King has introduced a bill that would protect the army of citizen spies Homeland Security hopes to recruit under Janet Napolitano’s “See Something, Say Something” snoop campaign from lawsuits brought by innocent people wrongly accused of being terrorists or extremists."
http://www.infowars.com/shocker-citizen-spy-networks-to-be-given-immunity/
Peter is well paid by the military industrial complex, now in the security business , and stasi business ,to the tune of 100s billions per year.
As the article notes, there is a problem. The article would benefit from greater credibility though if it wasn't riddled with typos.
e.g.: "where even the fringe the notion of Barack Obama as a Muslim fifth columnist still has currency"
One too many definite articles perhaps?
I make errors too and can play fast and loose with grammar, but I proofread anything major going out myself and then after that I get another set of eyes on it.
To use that awful expression: "is excellence overrated?".
Before everyone gets in a lather-Jews are still far and away the main victims of religion inspired hate crimes in the US. In 2009 there were 1575 religiously motivated attacks. ( a very small number for a country of 300 million and diverse religions). 72% of the attacks were against Jews. 8.4% of the attacks were against Muslims. Just a little perspective.
Oh God, not you again.
Got them from the FBI compilation of all law enforcement departments. Unlike you, I don't just pull things out of my ass.
You know, we get it. You hate Jews. There is a name for that you know.
You madam are a bigoted moron.
The article talks about DOMESTIC U.S. religious motivated attacks dip shit. It is not my fault you can't read and comprehend a simple article. By the way, it is "Israel" or "the Israelis" NOT "the Israel". And it is "a freaking buffoon". ....
And yes those statistics are true, no matter how much your Jew-hating semi-literate
ass would hate to admit it.
have a nice day
Hey, mr. King is doing his job. He makes himself look good to his dumb ass constituents, and keeps the conversation away from his malfeasance.
Brilliant.
"On one occasion, a judge threw [Peter King] out of a Belfast courtroom during the murder trial of IRA men because, in the judge's view, "he was an obvious collaborator with the IRA." When he attended other trials, the police singled him out for thorough body searches."
http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/peter-kings-secret-terrorism-loving-history