EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Protecting Women Human Rights Defenders
Josefina Reyes began her career as a human rights organizer the same way as thousands of women across the globe--defending her family and her community.
The middle-aged mother staged a hunger strike to demand the safe return of her son after Mexican soldiers abducted him from their home. She lost another son to the drug war violence that has come to characterize the Valle de Juarez, where the Reyes family lives. Josefina spoke out against this violence, particularly against abuses committed by the army and police deployed to fight organized crime.
In August 2009, she participated in the first regional Forum against Militarization and Repression. On January 5, 2010, Josefina Reyes was shot to death.
Mexican Army troops have occupied the Valle de Juarez since 2008, when the federal government launched the most intensive military operation in the country as part of the war on drugs. To date, Josefina’s son, two brothers, a sister, and a sister-in-law have been assassinated. None of these crimes has been solved.
Josefina’s case is one of many, and human rights organizations fear that if something isn’t done soon it will be one of many more. Last year saw a marked rise in violence against women and harassment of women human rights defenders.
In Latin America, death threats and assassinations by unknown assailants tend to be the modus operandi. State actors, paramilitaries, and members of organized crime are widely believed to be those responsible.
But since most of the crimes are never fully investigated or prosecuted, this politically motivated violence remains unnamed and unpunished. Widespread impunity creates a breeding ground for more violence.
Special Risks
Throughout the year, reports from women’s non-governmental organizations, grassroots movements, and the press warned that women who dared to speak out against violence were falling prey to it at alarming rates. Recent UN and national human rights organizations reports confirm this impression.
They point out that both men and women who defend human rights are frequent targets. However, the situation for women human rights defenders must be analyzed separately for several reasons.
Women often lead community organizations and movements that are on the frontline of battles against human rights violations and militarism. These brave women, usually compelled to act by personal experience, take on the most powerful forces in society with little support or publicity, and with few alliances and resources. Their work is critical to describing, denouncing, and punishing violations that threaten basic freedoms throughout the world.
Yet they often face ostracism from their families, stigmatization, and slander, and the active hostility of government officials that are either the subject of their complaints or complicit in protecting the interests of the perpetrators. Neither high-profile nor well-connected, these women activists face threats and harassment alone and unprotected.
On March 10, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders will present the first report to look exclusively at women human rights defenders.
The report states that, “Women human rights defenders and those working on women’s rights or gender issues in the Americas appear to be most at risk of being killed or having an attempt made on their lives.” Not surprisingly, the largest number of communications regarding documented instances of death threats against women human rights defenders came from the hemisphere’s drug war capitals -- Colombia and Mexico.
Women defenders confront the risk of gender-based violence, including rape and sexual abuse in their work. The threats and violence they face often spreads to their families and friends. Precisely because it is these ties to loved ones that so often motivate their organizing and protest activities, this form of repression is perhaps the cruelest of all.
Attacks on women human rights defenders are not well documented and often remain invisible except to the immediate community. This, and the lack of government recognition of their work or the risks it entails, makes them particularly vulnerable. The UN report notes, “In most cases there are no mechanisms for protection and where they do exist, there is a lack of implementation, political will or gender-sensitivity.” It states that Mexico is working toward a protection program and mechanism, but the plan still lacks a gender perspective. Moreover, protection efforts receive very little funding, even when mandated by a national or international body. At the same time, the U.S. and Mexican governments give hundreds of millions of dollars to security forces to fight organized crime.
Women and men who protest femicides (the systematic murder of women, as documented in Ciudad Juarez) -- LGBT activists, defenders of sexual and reproductive rights, labor movement leaders, women leaders of displaced communities, and anti-militarization organizers -- have reported the most threats and cases of violence in the Americas. They and their family members have been attacked, their homes burned or ransacked, their human rights organizations forcibly closed. Some have been forced into exile due to the threat of violence against them, as in the case of the remaining members of the Reyes Salazar family.
A special report on women human rights defenders in Mesoamerica, presented in Geneva on March 8, concludes that police and military presence has been counterproductive: “The militarization and massive influx of federal agents to combat insecurity has not successfully reversed this violent situation. On the contrary, violations of human rights by security forces -- particularly against youth and women -- are on the rise. In this context, human rights defenders face greater risks in carrying out their work while also lacking the necessary resources to protect themselves. Far from diminishing, we are able to affirm that violence against human rights workers, their families, and related organizations is intensifying and spreading.”
Where fear has been used to justify military responses, women not only do not receive the support they need but are frequently vilified for "rocking the boat." As violence and fear become the norms in areas where they live and work, non-violent activism is seen as destabilizing. Women activists are frequently punished socially and physically for their protests against state security forces and corrupt officials, and for their transgressions against patriarchal norms dictating that women should not play leadership roles in community organizing and politics.
The UN report concludes that women human rights defenders encounter high risks because of a lack of political will: “Government or police officials may themselves share the prevailing conservative and patriarchal views of the community in general towards women defenders and those working on women’s rights or gender issues, and thus may have little or no enthusiasm to intervene effectively for their protection in spite of their obligation to do so.”
Despite the risks, women continue to organize and lead human rights movements. They will need protection. Recommendations include: creating autonomous campaigns with grassroots support; achieving more visibility in the press and public; filing and documenting public complaints; mobilizing family and friends and like-minded organizations; seeking NGO accompaniment; carrying out informal security trainings; and holding psychological workshops to cope with the pressure.
National and international protective measures are a way of formally recognizing that a woman is at risk and sometimes, but not always, actually provide physical protection. Precautionary measures, particularly from the Inter-America Commission on Human Rights, provide some measure of protection and visibility.
None of these women should ever have to resort to the long bureaucratic procedure of requesting precautionary measures. The use of international mechanisms is a sign of state impunity and negligence in their home countries.
Defending the Defenders
This week’s UN report concludes that women’s security is linked to the security of their communities. Addressing this requires “a holistic approach that includes the deepening of democracy, the fight against impunity, the reduction of economic inequalities, and striving for social and environmental justice, among others.”
Unfortunately, in Mexico and other countries where the drug war model has been applied, these strategies have been displaced by strategies of enforcement and confrontation that necessitate the presence of security forces.
Protecting women human rights defenders requires that society consider their work valuable and, according to the UN Special Rapporteur, “publicly acknowledge the significant role played by women defenders and those working on women’s rights or gender issues in the consolidation and advancement of plural and inclusive societies.”
Women human rights defenders have been threatened, tortured, raped, exiled, and assassinated. But they have not been silenced. They fight for the rights of all of us at tremendous personal risk. They must not be left alone.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

8 Comments so far
Show AllIf it is any "consolation", the USA is almost there. Feminism in the USA is already DEAD ! The last of feminism in the USA peaked out in the 1970s, underwent slow but steady desecration in the 1980s and 1990s what with all this "soccer mom" fad, and after 9/11/2001 went dead as the new fad "security moms" came up. Yes, there are some of us women of all ages trying to keep the spirit alive for women's rights but we are a small minority to the rest of the women who either take the rights for granted or have even been brainwashed into fighting against them.
P.S.: When they are done enslaving the women, they will go after the children. It is already happening in my state of MO !
Children are automatically enslaved because they "belong" to their parents. It is a pity how young women take rights and gains that were struggled for long and hard as "entitlements" to which they didn't have to worry about keeping.
If the "soccer moms" and "security moms" are bad, what about these new "Tiger Moms"?
For whatever little it means, there are some of us guys who are on the side of the old style feminism.
I sincerely apologize for forgetting to mention also giving credit to all the men who are for feminism. Do not get me started with "Tiger Moms". They are only a symptom of feminism being dead in the USA.
Well said Paranoid Pessimist and JenniferB. By the way, Jennifer made some more excellent points on feminism and explains more on why she thinks feminism is dead.
http://www.alternet.org/health/150168
Click the comments section on the upper right hand corner to read them.
While I can't agree that it's dead for sure, she makes a compelling case as she connects the dots on feminism and the issues. Check it out and don't worry about the troll goon trying to attack her feminist credentials. Good job Jennifer and don't let those few bastards put you down.
Thank you maxpayne. Most people I have no problem communicating with and even some of them who mistook some of my posts as rightwing are generally kind after I explain to them. For the rare remainder who still do not get it or still have their "suspicions", I am sorry but they can kiss my ass and rot in hell for all I care. I rarely come across disrespectful posters but I am prepared to give them a piece of my mind. For the most part, I do not get time to read or post on any blog as I have busier schedules and a lot more in life to take care of. I am my own independent self and quite frankly, I see blogs as becoming less relevant. I understand that some people like to form and/or join "groups" or whatever they call it. However, I am not that type. I am independent, open-minded and willing to listen to other people's points of view with the possibility of using some of them to challenge my own thinking where I see fit. I do not judge anyone personally but by the content of their posts. However, at some point it can be safe to conclude just who some people really are such as Thomas More, Jake Newton, Shawn Berry, Horace, etc... I thank you for your appreciation. I appreciate being appreciated even when I do not anticipate it. I couldn't care less about who my friends are or are not so much as the fact that I can communicate well with almost anyone. :)
P.S.: I just took another look at the comments at that Alternet link article comments section. Earlier I was arguing with an annoying rightwing misogynist on that same topic but did not realize that he was "friends" with her. I find it odd that on the one hand she touts herself as a "feminist" and yet has the nerve to enjoy the right winger's trolling. I think that those two tried to set me up but whatever. I am done responding to either one of them as far as that topic is concerned. Then again, that same individual on Alternet who tried to discredit my post on feminism being dead in the USA is the same individual who has the nerve to defend the Obamabots while calling herself "independent". I will take her good writings into consideration while leaving aside her idiocy. I feel sorry that you and mmckinl have to face so much persecution from creeps like her and her Obamabot gang. But then again, Obamabots and Limbaugh dittoheads can make strange bedfellows indeed !
I saw your pro-feminist postings both here and on Alternet and they look sincere to me. Keep up your progress and do not let anyone's insulting behavior prevent you from progressing. Unlike Thomas More and Jake Newton, I think you have a kind heart and soul despite your past employment. :.)
You're welcome and thanks again. I think I understand what you're referring to. Gnat isn't all that bad once you get to know him real well. He's a libertarian more than a rightwinger but a friendly one unlike Horace. He agrees with some progressive ideas that overlap and actually likes Ralph Nader on lots of issues. Don't get taken between Quannah and gnat's dialogue. I have nothing personal against Quannah no matter how rude and disrespectful she gets with her bullying. I know what it's like when very bossy posters bully and dominate. Their usage of mental exclusion by praising everyone and leaving out names they personally hate without giving them credit even where there's agreement can be frustrating. I've been to blogs where there would be such dominant posters giving the names to credit and then saying "and others" which I often find to be an insult. No blog is perfect and every blog has intrigue going on all over : posters jumping on each other because one's a truther while the other one is "cointel pro", others claiming others have been out to get them for months, scholarly vs low IQ, tag team, sock puppets, username changes, paid industry shills, usual suspects, and other crazies for flaming. Petty arguments can often turn ugly and discourage otherwise great discussions. It can happen anytime but when it happens more frequently, I just feel like taking a "vacation" from the site and reading the archived posts later. Nobody knows what's really happening and even the most intelligent can only guess when these fights flame up.
"I see blogs as becoming less relevant."
You're probably not alone and I believe that most people are with you on that. One of the reasons that may be the case is that I see of a lot of divisions and classism going on in the forums whereby people who have special backgrounds get a lot of praise whereas ordinaries get ignored and praised less often. The "left out" feeling can hurt a lot of posters and make the forum feel as if it were more exclusive than inclusive. The "don't talk to strangers" attitude has pervaded even the blogosphere which is why "groups" appear to exist based on discussions in the forums.
"I do not judge anyone personally but by the content of their posts. "
Most people here and even on Alternet often do that and I have been getting better at it too even when faced with the worst of the bullies. I still can't help but notice double standards on judgments of people's posts. Let's take an example where MichaelX gets a huge praise for his post whereas you being similar to him get no praise or worse an insult. That kind of praising or insulting on the basis of their names and not their contents can be very hurtful and doesn't help anyone. I'm usually the kind type that will praise when the post is good and critique it when something's wrong with it.
"I saw your pro-feminist postings both here and on Alternet and they look sincere to me."
How kind of you and thanks. I post from my thinking and genuinely so. I don't make up stuff to overimpress or takeover whatever that means.
By the way, I would advise you not to get upset on Alternet even when attacked like that. Maybe you weren't on that one, I dunno, but still a word of caution. Another word of warning, be careful not to get into any long arguments with Quannah. The Alternet "moderators" appear to have a double standard of deleting comments even when not offensive upon arguing with Quannah. Is it a bug or censorshio? I dunno but it doesn't look good. I think you write rather well both here and on Alternet and you've been getting lots of likes and engaging in nice conversations even with some of the people most Green/third partiers wouldn't dare venture into. Why should you get upset over one classist bully on Alternet who doesn't really care for the less fortunate but flaunts her supposed history of being a union worker and a former ACORN employee when her own behavior nearly negates all that? You're young and you have done rather impressively well for your age where most wouldn't come close and you still have ahead of you. Myself, tailcap, mmckinl, oregoncharles, bill perdue, and plenty others here and on Alternet will always be there to keep your spirits bright. Don't be sad. Be glad.
I took one last peak at the discussion and would like to thank you for giving me a like on my last rebuttal on feminism. She does not take interest in my intelligent posts and yet she wants to twist and spin my less thorough posts anyway it suits her for fun. Some "feminist" she is ! In the other part of the thread, the race issue is getting out of hand so I will not even bother replying to anymore of that thread. Oh well, they just proved that feminism is dead in the USA so say no more. Let the creep over at Alternet make up what ever cock and bull about me she wants to make. She can kiss my ass and rot in hell with her Obamabot Democrat Party apologist crew for all I care ! Thank you again and I am doing just fine despite that woe.
Hear hear ! Stay strong young lady !